Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Work Session 3-4-2025

1:20:24762 summary words · ~4 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

Harrisburg City Council debated critical local governance measures, including taking exclusive control over police advisory board appointments, establishing a local court-supervised receivership to salvage the distressed Governor's Square affordable housing complex, and implementing zoning corrections to protect residential property values.

This session highlights how local municipal bodies navigate state laws, property rights, and community crises—ranging from police accountability and environmental stormwater management to rescuing failing affordable housing stock from negligent out-of-state owners.

Section summaries

0:00-2:01

Meeting Call to Order and Roll Call

skip

Council President Bowers opens the meeting at 5:31 PM and clerk Parker confirms a quorum of council members is present before reading Bill 1 of 2025 into the record.

Standard administrative opening roll call.

2:01-14:07

Bill 1 of 2025: Amending CLEAC

watch

Council reviews an ordinance to transfer all 7 CLEAC appointment slots to City Council, removing mayoral appointments. Council members share past frustrations with unfilled seats delaying the board's establishment since 2020 and reference community policing priorities.

Exposes the political tension between council and mayor over police accountability boards.

14:07-20:10

Bill 2 of 2025: Real Estate Tax Exoneration for Churches

optional

Solicitor Neil Grover presents a request to forgive 2024 property taxes for three local churches that missed a Dauphin County exemption re-registration deadline. Council members discuss the financial impact and confirm the Dauphin County Commissioners and School Board are also cooperating.

Important local administrative fix but represents a routine tax correction.

20:10-24:12

Resolution 12 of 2025: Actuarial Services for Union Negotiations

optional

The administration seeks approval to hire Conrad Siegel Inc. at $325/hour to analyze pension and legacy costs for upcoming AFSCME and FOP collective bargaining contract negotiations expiring at the end of 2025.

Routine municipal procurement and union negotiation preparation.

24:12-34:17

Resolution 13 of 2025: Gibson Boulevard Riparian Buffer Project

watch

Eric Nuski (Dauphin County Conservation District) and Josh Clark (HRG) pitch a DEP-funded lawn-to-meadow conversion on 1.4 acres of county-maintained land. The meadow will native-seed the area to filter runoff into Spring Creek and lower long-term mowing maintenance costs.

Directly relates to local environmental infrastructure, stormwater management, and county cooperation.

34:17-42:21

Resolution 14 of 2025: Salt Dome MOU & Solar Panel Removal

optional

Solicitor Grover details an agreement with Susquehanna Township School District for the city's salt dome storage. The city must remove and salvage wrapped, stacked solar panels from 2020 by April 30, 2025, using city crews rather than third parties to capture scrap value.

Niche discussion on municipal property logistics and recycling old public assets.

42:21-1:00:30

Resolution 11 of 2025: Budget Reallocation and Governor's Square Receivership

watch

Council evaluates a $500,000 litigation settlement fund top-up and $250,000 in seed money to petition for a court-supervised receiver for the failing Governor's Square housing complex. Discussion details horrific living conditions, local vs. out-of-town management, and federal relocation protections.

Critical debate on a major affordable housing crisis and a landmark receivership action in the city.

1:00:30-1:18:39

Bill 3 of 2025: 640 Alricks Street Rezoning

watch

Planning Director Jeffrey Knight presents a corrective zoning application to change a residential property's zoning from Industrial back to Residential Medium Density. Council debates how to handle systemic mapping errors without initiating illegal 'spot zoning' and outlines strict advertising timelines.

Highly relevant to zoning, land use, and the legal limits of city council's zoning powers.

1:18:39-1:18:39

Public Comment and Adjournment

skip

President Bowers opens the floor for public comment, but none is offered. The council votes to adjourn the session at 6:50 PM.

No public comments were made; standard closing procedures.

Key points

  • Consolidation of Police Advisory Appointments — Council is moving to take sole appointment authority for the Citizens Law Enforcement Advisory Committee (CLEAC), shifting from a split structure with the Mayor to expedite filling long-vacant seats.
  • Tax Exoneration for Forgotten Church Registrations — A county-wide property tax re-registration error left several historically tax-exempt churches facing unexpected bills and tax sales; Harrisburg is coordinating with Dauphin County to retroactively forgive these administrative errors.
  • Governor's Square Receivership & Affordable Housing Rescue — Facing severe code violations, condemnation, and negligent ownership, Harrisburg is dedicating $250,000 in state/ARPA grant seed money to petition for a local court-appointed receiver (Midtown Properties) to execute a HUD-approved rehabilitation plan.
  • Zoning Corrections and the Limits of Government-Initiated Rezoning — A zoning map correction on Alricks Street highlights the legal and practical tension between fixing widespread GIS map errors and avoiding 'spot zoning' without individual property owner consent.
to wait numerous years just just for one or two appointments I think it's just a bit ludicrous at this point Councilman Rodriguez
I've seen condemned homes with babies still living in them I've seen you know where they're expected to still pay the rent and there the bricks aren't finished on the home Councilman Rodriguez

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:20

um the time is 5:31 p.m. I would like to

0:24

call our work session to order

0:32

Mr Parker could you please call the

0:46

role Miss

0:51

Daniels Miss Davis present Miss green

0:57

present Mr Jones here

1:01

Ms RS present Mr Rodriguez present misss

1:06

Bowers present thank

1:10

you we have quite a full agenda this

1:13

evening so I'll just get started with

1:16

the work of the administration committee

1:19

we have two bills and three resolutions

1:21

for discussion we will begin with Bill

1:24

one of

1:27

2025 Mr Parker could you please read it

1:30

into the

1:32

record

1:34

yes Bill one of

1:37

2025 an ordinance amending chapter 2-

1:41

515 citizens law enforcement advisory

1:44

committee of title two administrative

1:46

code to Grant City Council exclusive

1:49

appointment authority over the citizens

1:51

law enforcement advisory

1:55

committee thank you um before we open up

2:00

the floor to any questions my colleagues

2:02

may have I just wanted to refresh

2:04

everyone's memory a little bit um about

2:07

the citizens law enforcement advisory

2:13

committee so the Council of the city of

2:16

Harrisburg recognizes that the mission

2:18

of the Harrisburg Bureau of police is to

2:21

protect and serve the public with honor

2:23

integrity and professionalism the

2:25

council acknowledges the importance of

2:28

public accountability of the her B

2:30

Bureau of police as well as law

2:32

enforcement throughout our nation to

2:34

ensure that the constitutional rights

2:36

and freedoms of all people are

2:39

upheld the council further recognizes

2:42

that fostering a strong and Collective

2:44

relationship between law enforcement and

2:46

the community is essential in building

2:49

trust enhancing Public Safety and

2:52

ensuring effective policing the council

2:55

recognizes there is a significant

2:57

community community interest in

2:59

strengthening the relationship between

3:01

the Harrisburg Bureau of police and the

3:03

residents they serve and ensuring that

3:06

the bureau remains accountable to the

3:08

people of Harrisburg the council finds

3:11

that providing opportunities for ongoing

3:14

dialogue oversight and collaboration

3:16

between the community and law

3:18

enforcement will help build public

3:20

confidence in the bureau and support the

3:22

goal of a safer more unified City to

3:25

further these objectives the council

3:27

established the citizens law enforcement

3:30

advisory committee through Bill 8 of

3:33

2020 as an advisory body composed of

3:37

City residents dedicated to promoting

3:40

transparency accountability and trust

3:43

between the community and law

3:45

enforcement the council in its ongoing

3:48

efforts to provide clear and consistent

3:50

leadership in governmental appointments

3:53

has expressed a preference for the

3:55

council to have sole authority over such

3:58

appointments to ensure alignment with

4:00

its broader Public Safety and governance

4:03

priorities in light of this policy

4:05

approach the council has determined that

4:07

the appointment Authority for the

4:10

citizens law enforcement advisory

4:12

committee should reside exclusively with

4:14

the council which was previously shared

4:17

between the mayor and the

4:19

council so uh just to note

4:24

chapter we're amending the

4:27

administrative code um part five of

4:29

title two of the codified ordinances for

4:32

the city of Harrisburg is amended uh to

4:35

read part five

4:38

2-500 entitled boards committees

4:42

authorities chapter

4:44

2-

4:46

515 entitled citizens law enforcement

4:49

advisory committee subsection 2-

4:54

5157 is entitled original committee

4:58

appointments sub sub section A the

5:01

original committee shall be comprised of

5:04

seven members appointed by the city

5:09

council um each of whom must be

5:11

confirmed by a majority vote of the

5:13

council prior to being Seated on the

5:16

committee so if you remember

5:18

previously um the original committee was

5:22

comprised of five members appointed by

5:24

city council and two members um were

5:28

appointed by the mayor so this amendment

5:31

um would provide Council the opportunity

5:35

to

5:36

uh make seven appointments versus five

5:41

um if you also recall during previous

5:45

conversations um regarding the citizens

5:49

law enforcement advisory committee um we

5:52

have been waiting for the final two

5:54

appointments so if you remember all

5:57

seven uh policing districts within the

5:59

city of Harrisburg must be represented

6:02

on this particular board um and we had

6:05

two outstanding uh appointees uh which

6:09

were forly of the mayor um I don't have

6:13

any questions I think that um this

6:16

amendment um offers Council the

6:19

opportunity to uh make the board um

6:24

complete as well as it allows the board

6:28

to begin its work um that it could not

6:31

start uh or have any action occur

6:34

without all seven appointees so I don't

6:37

have any questions I am in support um of

6:41

Bill one of 2025 I will now open the

6:45

floor to my colleagues who may have

6:47

additional questions or comments I will

6:50

defer to our Public Safety Committee

6:53

chair councilman Jones Thank You

6:55

president bers uh yeah um I concur with

6:58

you um I believe that but um this has

7:01

been taking some time for this to happen

7:03

and I believe this is another yet

7:05

another opportunity for our residents to

7:09

uh repair or even build a relationship

7:13

with the police department so um and

7:15

then you know so they can really get an

7:17

in-depth idea of what's happening and

7:19

what uh the residents are seeing so you

7:22

know I too am in support and I hope that

7:24

you know um our colleagues are too and

7:26

that's all I have thank you thank you

7:28

councilman rri Ruez you served as our

7:31

former uh Public Safety Committee chair

7:35

do you have any questions or comments

7:36

related to Bill one of 2025 yes thank

7:40

you madam president um I just Echo the

7:42

sentiments of my colleagues to the fact

7:44

of we need to stop any attempt of a

7:47

tyrannical Association whether it's

7:49

government municipality non-associated

7:52

entity if there's an a mechanism of

7:55

accountability for any Authority I think

7:57

it stops and prevents them from to act

8:00

out of you know the proper uh procedures

8:03

and protocols um I myself had an

8:05

incident just in December um where I was

8:07

illegally pulled over and I feel as

8:09

though that mechanism needs to be there

8:11

for accountability plus if we ask our

8:14

residents to serve on boards and they

8:16

stand up to the test to fight and help

8:19

city council and help the city move

8:20

forward and then we say oh I'm sorry we

8:22

were just playing they showed up for the

8:24

meetings they showed up for the

8:25

appointments and then we just kind of

8:27

leave them out in the in the open I

8:28

think we open them a due diligence to

8:30

fight harder and it's been going on

8:32

since 2020 I just feel as though we're

8:34

doing the right thing but at least

8:36

trying to move this forward it's not

8:39

that we don't want to work with the

8:41

administration and making it happen it's

8:42

just we feel as though maybe this is one

8:44

thing we could take off of the plate of

8:46

the administration and assist with even

8:48

further so I don't want it to be looked

8:50

at as like a tug-of-war type of ordeal

8:52

we just feel as though we had great

8:54

people appointed um the board was nearly

8:56

finished and to wait numerous years just

8:59

just for one or two appointments I think

9:01

it's just a bit ludicrous at this point

9:03

and hopefully we can move this forward

9:04

and get this board appointed and have an

9:06

accountability measurement for the

9:07

residents if or when um any officers or

9:10

our law gets a little bit hellbent and

9:12

out of shape um that's really all I have

9:14

to say thank you thank you councilwoman

9:17

R any questions or comments thank you

9:19

president Bowers and good evening

9:21

everybody um I don't have any questions

9:24

um I'm in support of this I remember um

9:28

councilman rrig gu working diligently on

9:31

interviews on contacting members to be

9:34

on the cleak board I'm so I know we put

9:36

a lot of hard workor in it on this

9:39

project and it's time to move it forward

9:40

and also I believe vice president um

9:43

Asha green also took part and when it

9:46

first started up and she was part of

9:48

Public Safety so this has been a

9:50

long-going process and I I agree with

9:53

councilman Rodriguez it's not a a a tug

9:55

of war it's only hey you know let's get

9:57

this started the residents are looking

9:59

forward to it we they've already been

10:02

picked it's time for them to serve

10:03

they're ready and the community is ready

10:05

so we can continue to build the bridge

10:08

between the police department and the

10:09

residents and accountability and this is

10:11

a great step forward so I'm in full

10:14

support of it thank you vice president

10:18

green another former public safety

10:20

committee chair who was instrumental um

10:23

in the development of Bill 8 of

10:27

2020 do you have any question questions

10:29

or comments uh no questions just

10:31

comments um I agree with everyone else

10:33

um the time has come it's been come um

10:36

you know it's the reason why this this

10:38

came to fruition to begin with um even

10:40

before I let the charge for Bill 8 um

10:43

there was an effort to get this done

10:44

years before when uh councilman Johnson

10:47

and councilman Majors led the charge

10:49

originally um and it just wasn't able to

10:51

come together um in 20120 we really uh

10:54

made sure we got out there spoke with

10:56

the residents held Town Halls even

10:57

during the pandemic we did it virtually

10:59

we did it at parks uh just to make sure

11:01

we could get people's input uh we did

11:03

all that we got the input we got it

11:05

passed and then um for it still not to

11:08

be actually up and running um it just

11:11

doesn't serve the residents well so uh I

11:13

know that Council has made our

11:14

appointments I know the mayor um may

11:16

have had some issues finding people uh

11:18

that lived in those districts to fill it

11:19

so maybe with with our Outreach and our

11:22

resources um we can make those

11:24

appointments to make sure things get

11:25

done and we can continue to move forward

11:27

um I know one of the the parts of the

11:30

CSA program was supposed to be able to

11:31

work uh hand inand with cleak um and the

11:35

CSA program has went from a pilot to a

11:38

full-blown program to director after

11:40

director and and we still don't have

11:42

this up and running yet so I look

11:43

forward to getting this done um to make

11:45

sure that the the residents have that

11:47

input and that ability because it was

11:49

something that that they really wanted

11:50

and continue to want so um I just hope

11:52

everyone can support this so we can move

11:54

forward with it so thank

11:56

you thank you Council woman Davis any

12:00

questions or comments thank you

12:02

president Bowers no questions for

12:05

me okay thank you councilwoman Daniels

12:08

any questions or

12:10

comments no questions okay thank you um

12:15

I did want to

12:16

read uh the remainder of subsection

12:22

2-51

12:23

5.7 um subsection D reads that city

12:27

council shall make a request to City

12:30

neighborhood groups for recommendations

12:32

of qualified residents from their

12:35

neighborhood for appointment to the

12:37

committee uh subsection 2- 515.24h

12:46

[Music]

12:59

occurring on the committee and

13:02

subsection uh 2-51 5.8 subsection D Reed

13:08

City Council shall accept the

13:09

committee's recommendation or

13:12

recommendations or otherwise appoint

13:14

another eligible individual subject to a

13:18

majority vote of City Council in

13:21

accordance with the provisions of

13:22

chapter 2 uh section or Chapter

13:27

2-31 3 of the administrative

13:31

code believe those are all the amended

13:34

uh sections so I just wanted to read

13:36

those but if there are no further

13:39

questions or comments I move to add I'm

13:43

sorry president councilwoman Davis yes I

13:45

was just going to ask I guess there's no

13:47

one here from the uh Administration to

13:51

speak on

13:53

this this bill well the solicitor can

13:57

speak to it I guess from the administ 's

13:59

perspective but this bill was at was

14:03

drafted at our request if you would like

14:06

commentary I'm not sure if you have a

14:08

question for the solicitor No my only

14:10

point was that it's a council request so

14:12

there is no the administration doesn't

14:14

present on a council request thank you

14:16

for clarifying yes okay if there are no

14:21

further questions or comments anything

14:23

else councilwoman Davis okay um I moved

14:26

to add Bill one of 202 five to our next

14:30

legislative session agenda for a

14:33

vote next we have Bill two of 20125 Mr

14:38

Parker could you please read it into the

14:42

record Bill two of

14:45

2025 an ordinance for giving and

14:47

discharging 2024 city city real estate

14:52

taxes including interest penalties and

14:55

costs and striking off tax leans for

14:57

certain historically tax exempt

15:01

properties thank you um is there anyone

15:04

from the administration that will speak

15:06

to Bill two of

15:08

2025 so this request actually originates

15:11

out of the law Bureau based on our

15:13

meetings with the other taxing

15:15

authorities um dolin County at I guess

15:18

2023 did a re-registration for the first

15:21

time of every uh exempt property in the

15:24

Dolphin County a few of the churches

15:27

right now we know of three in the city a

15:29

bunch outside the city never turned in

15:30

their paperwork and then got a tax bill

15:33

having never got a tax bill they thought

15:35

it was just a mistake and didn't pay the

15:37

tax bill uh and then finally realized

15:39

they had to go in and deal with the

15:40

board the board was able to give them

15:42

each an exemption but they couldn't

15:43

forgive they don't have the ability to

15:45

forgive the prior year's taxes but it

15:47

really was just a paperwork era those

15:49

churches have all around the three of

15:50

them here for a very long time they

15:52

haven't always been the same

15:53

congregation but they've always been a

15:55

house of worship um and so they were

15:57

traditionally exempt Under Pennsylvania

15:59

Constitution and under under city code

16:01

so this is just this is a request to

16:03

exonerate those past due taxes because

16:06

um neither the mayor or the treasurer

16:07

can just give a blessing and wipe them

16:09

out so the school board as my

16:10

understanding has voted on at least two

16:12

of them and is agreeable with all three

16:14

I think the county has voted on all

16:15

three the Commissioners um and so we're

16:18

just basically in line with that um so

16:20

that they're currently all exempt they

16:22

just have a year of taxes that is deemed

16:24

passed due uh that um and I frankly

16:27

don't know whether they paid them and

16:28

and and appealed or haven't paid them

16:30

and appealed but it was just really from

16:32

the

16:33

administrative uh change in Direction at

16:35

the county that's

16:36

happened thank you for clarifying um I

16:39

don't have any other questions if the

16:42

school board and the Dolphin County

16:44

Commissioners have taken action guess

16:46

we're next in line um so I don't have

16:49

any other questions I'll defer to my

16:51

colleagues who may have some I'll begin

16:53

with our uh budget and finance committee

16:56

chair vice president green any questions

16:59

no I don't have any questions regarding

17:00

this thank you thank you councilwoman

17:02

Davis any questions no questions

17:05

president of ours thank you thank you

17:07

councilwoman Daniels any

17:11

questions yeah what's the value of of

17:15

that of of this

17:18

ordinance what's the dollar amount being

17:20

forgiven yeah actually I don't know I

17:23

didn't look it up because they shouldn't

17:24

have been taxed in the first place but I

17:26

can get you that information

17:29

and have any properties like paid tax

17:31

for 2024 that will have to be

17:34

refunded so if they've paid taxes

17:36

authorizer refunding I did not get into

17:38

the weeds because it was simply agreed

17:40

it was an error across the board um and

17:44

you know they they have emailed they

17:45

have called many people uh and have

17:47

presented already to the school board

17:49

and to the county uh board of appeals uh

17:53

and uh not surprising mostly like unlike

17:57

other developer type people their

17:59

appeals are all by volunteers helping

18:00

them trying to fix their problem and so

18:03

uh but I can get you the details on each

18:04

property what the tax bill that went out

18:06

was what the assessed value is and

18:08

whether they were paid or not um but

18:10

under Pennsylvania real estate law if

18:12

you have three years of non-real estate

18:14

taxes you go up for tax sale so you know

18:17

they they did their part and came in for

18:19

their exemption but they exemption can't

18:21

go back to the prior year it goes when

18:23

they apply so it left one year open in

18:27

question and is are all three properties

18:31

do all three belong to the same entity

18:33

or or is it three separate owners three

18:37

separate congregations nothing as I know

18:39

to even do with each other totally

18:40

different people contacted us on each of

18:43

them do we expect more of these requests

18:47

or do you think the problem has been

18:49

addressed systemically so we were just

18:52

on a call with the county tax Bureau

18:54

Representatives the County's tax lawyers

18:57

and the uh

19:00

um Board of assessment appeals people

19:03

there are a handful around the county

19:05

that still have not responded at all um

19:08

no two years in um they just haven't

19:11

filled out an exemption form they

19:12

haven't done anything I forget if you

19:14

said down to 36 of them around the

19:16

county that there's still an open

19:17

question so they're Pro they're being

19:19

proceeded with as if they are taxable at

19:21

the moment um so there could be another

19:24

that comes but these are the ones that

19:25

have been identified to date

19:29

you that's it for me thank you thank you

19:32

councilwoman RS any questions no I don't

19:35

have any questions but thank you

19:36

president Bowers thank you councilman

19:38

Rodriguez any questions um no this is

19:41

pretty standard in the nonprofit or

19:43

churches um type of world so uh thank

19:46

you for presenting Neil no questions

19:48

thank you councilman Jones any questions

19:51

um no um my concerns were same as um

19:55

councilwoman Daniel so thank you thank

19:58

you you if there are no further

20:01

questions or comments I move to add Bill

20:04

two of 2025 to our next legislative

20:08

session agenda for a vote next we have

20:12

resolution 12 of 20125 Mr Parker could

20:16

you please read it into the record yes

20:19

resolution 12 of

20:21

2025 a resolution authorizing the city

20:24

of Harrisburg to negotiate and enter

20:26

into a Professional Services agre

20:28

agreement with Conrad seagull

20:31

Incorporated to provide Actuarial

20:34

services to assist the city in

20:36

negotiations of certain collective

20:38

bargaining

20:40

agreements thank

20:44

you who will be representing the

20:47

administration for discussion of

20:49

resolution 12 of

20:51

2025 somehow I suspect that's me okay

20:54

solicitor Grover so uh on December 31st

20:59

2025 both the asme contract and the fop

21:02

contract expire in the course of making

21:06

an evaluating proposals back and forth

21:08

we need an actual orial service to

21:10

provide long-term analysis of those

21:13

numbers what what are the Legacy cost of

21:15

a of a proposal in either direction they

21:18

will make analysis of both ones that are

21:20

made and ones that are as as you're

21:23

going through a list of potential things

21:24

to figure out which one makes the best

21:26

sense so they're not they're not NE

21:29

they pre-decisional deliberation type of

21:31

things you present professional with a

21:33

series of potential options and they

21:34

give you how those numbers work um the

21:38

uh right now they are under contract to

21:40

give us OPB analysis for pension only

21:44

but this is to give them a a broader

21:46

scope it's not part of their current

21:47

contract to do this others and they have

21:49

done it for us in the past in other

21:51

contract

21:53

periods okay thank

21:56

you uh I don't have any questions

22:03

um no I don't have any questions the

22:06

hourly rate is

22:09

$325 per hour for the

22:14

services and and the services will

22:17

essentially be how much we give them

22:18

right like if you if you have to look at

22:20

12 options it's a whole lot more than

22:22

six options

22:24

so

22:26

okay I don't have any questions I'll

22:28

open the floor to my colleagues who may

22:30

have additional questions um I will

22:32

begin this time with councilwoman RWS

22:36

any

22:36

questions thank you president bars no

22:39

this was pretty much straightforward I

22:41

know this is a contract we've been

22:42

engaging with with the last bargaining

22:44

agreement so I'm fine thank you

22:48

councilman Rodriguez thank you Madame

22:51

President um solicitor Grover do you

22:53

know how far back the relationship spans

22:55

with the firm and the city I've been

22:58

here since 2014 and they were here

22:59

before I got here okay so I don't know

23:01

when it started okay I just was gazing

23:04

on their website and it seems like they

23:06

handled ourselves as well so I just

23:07

wanted to see how far have they been

23:09

taking care of our accounts and is there

23:11

a great standing relationship yeah they

23:12

were here before receivership through

23:14

receivership and since receivership okay

23:16

awesome no further questions thank you

23:18

thank you councilman Jones um I will

23:22

probably ask you some questions um off

23:25

record um I'm try in here

23:30

so uh no questions right now okay thank

23:33

you vice president green any questions

23:37

no I don't have any questions regarding

23:38

this thank you uh councilwoman Davis any

23:41

questions thank you president Bowers it

23:43

sounds pretty cut and dry to me no

23:45

questions thank you okay councilwoman

23:48

Daniels any

23:50

questions have questions okay thank you

23:54

um if there are no further questions or

23:57

comments related to Res resolution 12 of

24:00

2025 I move to add it to our next

24:05

legislative session agenda for a

24:08

vote resolution 13 of 2025 Mr Parker

24:13

could you please read it into the

24:15

record

24:16

yes resolution 13 of

24:19

2025 a resolution authorizing the city

24:22

of Harrisburg to negotiate and enter

24:24

into a landowner grantee agreement with

24:27

the dolphin County Conservation District

24:30

in furtherance of the 2024 countywide

24:33

action plan riparian buffer

24:37

project thank you um believe we have

24:41

gentlemen from the district wonderful

24:44

thank

24:50

you yes if you could please move that

24:53

microphone very close to you um press

24:57

the bottom button to make sure that it's

24:59

on

25:01

and is it on yes it's on can you move it

25:04

closer to you though if you uh good

25:06

evening um if you wouldn't mind

25:08

introducing yourself for sure um and

25:10

then providing an overview of the

25:12

resolution thank you yeah thanks a lot

25:14

thank you so much for having us my name

25:16

is Eric nuski I'm the uh department head

25:18

of the Dolphin County Conservation

25:21

District um and uh this is my good

25:25

evening I'm Josh Clark I'm uh the

25:27

countywide action plan program manager

25:29

with hrg and hrg serves as the

25:31

countywide action plan coordinator for

25:33

golin

25:36

County okay great um what we have what

25:38

we brought and thank you very much to Mr

25:40

Parker and Mr Grover for getting us on

25:42

the agenda it's it's a big help we've

25:43

been uh we're kind of up against the

25:45

time constraint to have this grant funds

25:48

these Grant funds spent so again thank

25:50

you very much for having us um the

25:53

property uh that in we're referring to

25:56

is 919

25:58

uh Gibson Boulevard it's uh behind the

26:01

Dolphin County Work Release Center um

26:04

it's about a 2

26:06

acre um lawn at this point um since the

26:11

building to my knowledge and what I was

26:13

been told by the people who work at the

26:15

at the um work Relief Center the county

26:18

has been maintaining this property since

26:20

the center was built in 1996 and

26:23

basically that just means mowing the

26:25

grass and maybe moving some down trees

26:27

if they fall um a couple years ago uh I

26:31

was approached when this the countywide

26:33

action plan funding came um to the

26:36

county and to the district and to the

26:38

County Planning Commission um we were

26:41

out looking for projects um I was

26:43

contacted by the staff at the at the uh

26:46

Work Release Center about maybe doing a

26:49

lawn to Meadow conversion on this

26:51

property to really achieve two main

26:53

goals one is to and probably the most

26:56

important is to at least in my my world

27:00

uh is to improve water quality going to

27:02

Spring Creek um the other the other

27:05

motivation behind this is um basically

27:09

to save costs on the maintenance the

27:11

mowing of the property um and the cap

27:15

I'm going the countywide action plan I

27:16

going refer to it as the cap the cap

27:18

funds um are part of a d Grant to the

27:24

county to improve water quality the

27:26

overall goal of improving water quality

27:28

to s River and then therefore Chesapeake

27:32

Bay as part of the state's Chesapeake

27:34

Bay Watershed um

27:38

yeah Watershed plan sorry um we're

27:42

looking at about 1.4 acres of converted

27:47

um lawn to a

27:50

meadow um and I'm going to let joshh

27:54

talk a little bit more about the the

27:55

technical part of this as far as like

27:57

what exactly that means a meadow um and

28:02

uh um off the top of my head I think

28:05

that's about it um I don't want to take

28:06

up too much of your time so Josh if you

28:08

want to go over what the sort of the the

28:11

nuts and bolts of the conversion what

28:13

that

28:14

means yeah so the idea here would be to

28:17

basically take the turf grass down as

28:20

low as we can get it without really

28:21

disturbing the soil and then conceivably

28:24

we would be drilling the seeds um into

28:27

what would have bin lwn so that it can

28:29

grow back as native plant species which

28:32

would be great for water quality for

28:34

pollinators that sort of thing um the

28:37

way that this is set up um we have about

28:39

a 40 foot um M area that will be

28:42

maintained as Turf so that there's a

28:44

line of sight through and down the hill

28:46

here um and there will also be um about

28:50

15 feet the whole way around for the

28:51

same purpose so that it's kind of

28:53

delineated as an intentional Meadow for

28:55

the whole thing um as Eric mentioned it

28:58

does reduce maintenance over time um

29:01

ideally this will be mowed once a year

29:03

after this after it's established so

29:05

that um Woody plants don't come through

29:07

it will be maintained as a meow over

29:09

time and it will lead to reductions for

29:12

water

29:16

quality okay thank you very

29:19

much could I add something to what Josh

29:22

said um the county has the county at the

29:24

work relase center they they they they

29:26

have um agreed to continue the

29:28

maintenance that annual mowing so there

29:30

would still be no nothing really that

29:32

would fall under the responsibility of

29:34

the city as far as that

29:40

goes thank

29:43

you okay I don't have any questions it

29:46

seems like

29:47

the um the confirmation letter I assume

29:52

this is is pretty clear on the

29:55

responsibilities um and for main areas

29:59

cooperate with the project Partners

30:01

during the preliminary work needed to be

30:03

completed allow project Partners to

30:05

perform site visits during project

30:08

scoping review and approve proposed

30:11

project design documents and allow the

30:14

planting of trees and shrubs on my

30:16

property as you mentioned um thank you I

30:19

don't have any questions thank you for

30:21

your presentation um I will now open the

30:24

floor to my colleagues who may have

30:26

additional questions this time I'd like

30:28

to begin uh with our uh Public Works

30:31

committee chair councilman Rodriguez um

30:34

do you have any questions or comments

30:36

related to resolution 13 of 2025 thank

30:40

you madam president and thank you

30:41

gentlemen for uh giving us that uh brief

30:43

synopsis of the project um are now when

30:47

we speak about uh what you guys are

30:49

talking about it definitely plays within

30:50

the County's comprehensive plan overall

30:53

um is there any assessments or any

30:55

surveys needed um or will you guys you

30:58

ready on

30:59

go yeah we're ready to go as soon as as

31:02

we're allowed to go awesome thank you no

31:04

no further questions thank you

31:06

councilman Jones any

31:07

questions um thank you thank you guys

31:10

for your uh brief presentation you know

31:13

but I do just want to say that um can

31:15

you guys do a little bit more we need

31:17

the best water quality that we could get

31:19

right now no but I appreciate uh you

31:21

know efforts taking steps towards that

31:24

um I think it's a great project and I

31:27

have no questions so thank you thank you

31:30

councilwoman Ros any questions um no I

31:33

don't have any questions I did see that

31:34

it was a meadow that was exciting you

31:37

know um and helps with the water quality

31:40

so um I was excited to see that I did

31:42

want to see what it would look like I

31:44

know you brought some plans and I didn't

31:45

know how we could let the community

31:46

members see that um so those were like

31:49

my two like comments slash questions

31:51

just so everyone could get a

31:52

visual I can forward over the Draft

31:55

plans and get some concept um photos

31:58

included as well that would be great

32:00

thank

32:01

you vice president green any questions

32:04

thank you president Bowers thank you all

32:06

for being here tonight I don't have any

32:07

questions um I would like to see some

32:09

pictures uh when I think Meadows I think

32:11

like frolicking through flowers so um

32:14

yeah like like uh getting to know what

32:16

it would look like a little better um

32:18

just helps from a personal perspective

32:19

so thank you thank you councilwoman

32:22

Davis any questions you president Bowers

32:25

and Mr dudeski and Mr Clark thank you

32:28

for your presentation um you mentioned

32:31

the water quality uh you specifically

32:33

mentioned Spring Creek I was just

32:36

wondering why you specifically mentioned

32:38

Spring Creek I know there's a lot of

32:40

other businesses in between and there I

32:44

so the topography from the Work Release

32:48

Center flows down to Spring Creek so any

32:50

of the Overland flow that goes through

32:52

that Meadow will be clean before it gets

32:54

to Spring Creek

32:57

the actual Creek

33:00

y okay cause he mentioned Spring Creek

33:02

so I didn't know I'm thinking about the

33:05

nursing

33:07

H okay so you're talking about Oak Creek

33:10

well if you don't ask questions you

33:12

won't know right the only dumb question

33:14

is the the one you don't ask thank you

33:18

thank you very

33:19

much councilwoman Daniels any

33:25

questions no questions thank you okay

33:28

thank you if there are no further

33:31

questions or comments I move to add

33:34

resolution 13 of 2025 to our next

33:38

legislative session agenda for a

33:42

vote our final resolution for discussion

33:45

within the administration committee is

33:47

resolution 14 of 2025 Mr Parker could

33:51

you please read it into the record yes

33:54

resolution 14 of 2025

33:58

a resolution authorizing the city of

34:00

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

34:03

memorandum of understanding with the

34:05

Squan Township School District for the

34:07

purpose of the continued use of assault

34:10

Dome storage facility and the removal of

34:13

solar

34:15

panels thank you a solicitor Grover are

34:19

I suspect that's me again you are you

34:21

present okay so um so this property at

34:25

least related to the city has a long

34:27

history it had belonged for decades to

34:29

the Harrisburg School District

34:31

Harrisburg School District got approved

34:33

and transferred the property to Susannah

34:35

School District on January 31st of this

34:38

year for I've I've lost track for eight

34:42

years maybe we've had a salt Dome parked

34:44

on these 40 acres plus solar panels we

34:47

had acquired are stored there under this

34:50

agreement um it extends our time to be

34:53

there formally by one year as long as we

34:55

remove the Sol solar panels off the

34:57

property I think by April 30th is under

34:59

the contract uh and then it's up for an

35:02

extension for a second year as we

35:04

relocate the salt Dome um and I will

35:08

note that that uh the school district

35:10

our school district shares salt with us

35:12

so we're not the only user of that

35:14

particular facility um so they've been

35:17

in the process of relocating a salt Dome

35:18

finding a location for it frankly I've

35:20

lost track how that's going but uh but

35:23

Public Works has been at that for a

35:24

while you need a piece of land that's

35:26

outside the flood plan to do that uh and

35:29

certain certain features uh to be able

35:31

to do it um the uh but this agreement

35:35

allows us to maintain that there without

35:37

having to immediately relocate uh the

35:39

property how long it will take uh that

35:42

property put into use otherwise I have

35:44

no idea where the subsquent school

35:46

district is in the

35:49

process thank you uh just wanted to

35:52

clarify on the removal of the solar

35:54

panels it notes um the solar pan panels

35:58

must be removed from the site within 90

36:00

days of closing or no later than April

36:02

30th of this year which you noted I just

36:04

wanted to note the 90 days in the event

36:07

um something

36:08

changes

36:09

[Music]

36:11

um the city of Harrisburg is authorized

36:14

to negotiate and enter into an agreement

36:16

with the cesan Township School District

36:18

to continue utilizing the salt Dome

36:20

storage area for a period of one year

36:23

with a possible one-year extension

36:25

subject to the school district's

36:27

approval and to remove the solar panels

36:30

from the property no later than April

36:32

30th

36:34

2025 I don't have any questions thank

36:37

you for uh providing the background in

36:39

history or reminding everyone um I will

36:43

again defer to our Public Works

36:45

committee chair councilman Rodriguez um

36:48

do you have any questions or comments

36:50

related to resolution 14 of

36:52

2025 thank you madam president uh

36:55

solicitor Grover would these be the same

36:57

panels that I believe we contracted

37:00

wildart by 2020 to remove it is exactly

37:03

the same they they were wrapped and

37:05

moved there at that time um and uh have

37:09

not as I know that I know have been

37:11

utilized in any way uh there's I think

37:13

differing opinions on their usefulness

37:16

uh as time has gone on but the

37:18

prevailing opinion is they're not very

37:20

useful at this point but that that they

37:22

have salvage value um in terms of having

37:25

them disposed of would we be able to

37:28

utilize our crew at public works or

37:31

within the city to remove them or would

37:34

we go with a similar you um with an

37:36

agency or a nonprofit crew no it will be

37:39

the city's crew the reason we had to use

37:41

another party last time was we were on a

37:43

clock rid of them from the the property

37:45

had been sold and the common was about

37:46

to put a building on that property so

37:49

that was what brought us to have to get

37:51

them out and it was a lot of hands to

37:53

disassemble them okay but now they're

37:55

just now they're wrapped and stacked and

37:57

um and so whether they go directly to uh

38:01

disposal I don't know or whether they

38:03

have a place they're going to locate

38:04

them but they were working on that last

38:06

I talked to them but they did believe

38:07

there was value in

38:10

um the scrap a component of was

38:14

particularly more valuable than other

38:15

parts the copper or internal and so uh I

38:19

had asked law Bureau has asked that they

38:21

get us uh someone of um uh qual

38:25

qualified to render an opinion on

38:28

usefulness of them like why are these no

38:31

longer of value um and this would come

38:34

back if they're going to dispose of them

38:35

they come back on a regular uh

38:37

resolution to council for disposal of

38:39

public property yeah um so uh but that

38:42

was the we were working on through

38:44

Public Works last I asked him to get us

38:45

that information yeah I would imagine

38:47

there's more high efficiency like units

38:49

nowadays but they probably definitely

38:52

have the use somehow some way even if

38:54

it's scrapping and getting from the

38:55

precious metals retaining some of the

38:57

value Val right I think I think the

38:59

theory is that that the having sat there

39:02

the internal parts are just not as

39:04

valuable and a new one is not much more

39:07

expensive than this old one and has a

39:09

longer lifespan but it's for cost

39:11

Effectiveness is something we could

39:12

definitely take care of in housee yes

39:13

absolutely okay thank you sure no

39:15

further questions thank you uh I'll now

39:18

move to the other end councilwoman

39:20

Daniels any

39:24

questions no thank you thank you

39:27

councilwoman Davis any

39:30

questions no questions okay vice

39:33

president green any questions uh no

39:36

questions just will note that the fee is

39:38

$100,000 or no $100 excuse me it's a

39:41

$100 fee for one year correct I guess so

39:44

I haven't pay attention to tell the

39:47

truth it says upon execution of the

39:49

agreement and upon sas's proper

39:52

invoicing of city city shall pay susuan

39:55

a fee of $100 for inter into the

39:57

agreement and for the first year license

40:00

period to

40:01

city right I think the reality is those

40:03

checks never get written When government

40:05

say it's $100 to each other all right

40:07

right it's like used to be you us you

40:09

used to say a dollar now you say $100

40:11

okay so all right thank you okay thank

40:14

you councilwoman Ross any questions that

40:17

was one of my questions um I did not see

40:20

that when I was reading it and I'm sure

40:22

I see it's like right there but um I was

40:24

wondering how much it was cuz I know we

40:26

are going to be in charge of the

40:28

liability for it do we pay the liability

40:30

insurance I so because it is a liability

40:33

they don't want it that's why they want

40:34

it off their property um so uh so that

40:37

that's that was the agreement get of us

40:39

getting rid of it so it's it would be

40:41

covered under our general liability of

40:42

of other property we have um I think

40:45

it's just the public works just trying

40:48

to make a determination whether it makes

40:50

sense to have them for a while and take

40:52

them apart or or to be more dramatic in

40:55

how they're removed and they're for help

40:58

to do that so so and uh but I think the

41:01

city Engineers on it the traffic

41:02

engineer people are on it public works

41:04

people are on it um and I'm waiting for

41:06

an answer back okay sounds good it's

41:09

pretty straightforward other than that

41:11

um thank you sure thank you councilman

41:14

Jones any questions uh yes um how much

41:18

are these were where are they going to

41:20

be no I'm messing with

41:21

you those were the same questions I had

41:24

the questions were asked and answered so

41:25

thank you true thank you if there are no

41:29

further questions or comments related to

41:31

resolution 14 of

41:34

2025 I move to add it to our next

41:38

legislative session agenda for a vote

41:41

this concludes the business of the

41:44

administration committee next we have

41:46

budget and finance committee I will

41:48

defer to our budget and finance

41:50

committee chair vice president green to

41:52

lead discussion thank you president

41:55

Bowers um looks like we have one res

41:57

resolution in the budget and finance

41:58

committee which is resolution 11 of

42:01

2025 resolution approving the second

42:04

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

42:07

appropriation and allocation of certain

42:09

funds and do we have anyone from the

42:11

administration to represent this so

42:13

these are actually both from the legal

42:15

department all right um as you know in

42:17

the annual budget there's a settlement

42:18

fund um it is depleted because we have

42:22

uh entered into or have negotiated

42:24

without final signature for separate

42:26

settlements

42:27

that will deplete the fund and we're

42:29

looking to re refurbish the fund so it's

42:31

moving $500,000 into the fund um you

42:35

know and some of those we've talked

42:36

about in the executive session of of how

42:38

we're resolving

42:41

those all right I thought we might have

42:44

got to hear from somebody else tonight

42:45

but it's good to hear from you I maybe

42:48

Michael just didn't call anybody I don't

42:49

know I have no idea

42:51

so that's incorrect I made sure that

42:54

everyone was going to be here

43:03

um I don't really have any questions

43:04

regarding this um I think the solicitor

43:06

covered it um for and did you want to

43:09

talk to the second one at the same time

43:10

or did you want to take them one at that

43:11

time I was going to do one at a time

43:13

anyone uh have any questions regarding

43:16

schedule one um I will start to my far

43:20

right here with councilwoman

43:25

Daniels no questions thank you

43:28

councilwoman

43:30

Davis no questions thank you president

43:34

Bowers I don't have any questions I'll

43:36

save my comment for the next

43:38

one thank you councilwoman Ross no I

43:42

don't have any questions thank you

43:43

though vice president green thank you

43:46

councilman Rodriguez no questions for me

43:48

thank you thank you and councilman Jones

43:50

any questions yeah I M as well so um no

43:53

I don't have any questions thank you

43:55

thank you very much um we can move on to

43:58

the second part of the schedule uh the

44:00

second item is the initial seed money

44:03

allocation there is no allocation for

44:06

the receivership petition we put in for

44:08

Governor Square um the city has filed as

44:11

you know a petition in the county court

44:13

ask for an appointment of receiver one

44:15

of the conditions of receivership is

44:17

that the Court's order will provide for

44:19

eventual reimbursement to the city of

44:20

any funds put up um I think just for the

44:23

cold hard reality this is an initial um

44:27

allocation as they get underway and

44:30

evaluate the property um I can tell you

44:32

the other step simultaneous with this is

44:35

getting a stipulation of stakeholders in

44:38

the process uh so that there's not a

44:40

fight about the receivership itself um

44:43

we did a similar thing that got us out

44:45

of Bankruptcy Court over to the county

44:48

court and it would be essentially the

44:50

same stakeholders although they're not

44:51

parties to the receivership um but they

44:54

have interest financially in the

44:56

property and in the debt of this so the

44:58

receiver uh we presented um Midtown

45:02

Properties uh as the requested receiver

45:05

they would open a separate LLC they

45:07

avoid the liabilities of the current

45:08

owner and manager and they would be

45:11

appointed to hire a qualified manager

45:13

approv approved by Hud and the court so

45:16

they would report to the court not the

45:18

city um and um the uh and we're doing

45:23

something I think fairly it's a fairly

45:25

big lift that we're undertaking but

45:27

there's no one else taking it um the

45:29

threat has been at different times just

45:31

for them to walk away and leave the

45:32

tenants there um so uh half of the

45:36

properties are vacant or supposed to be

45:39

vacant um the uh I think they 23 of the

45:43

buildings are

45:44

condemned um and so the idea is to come

45:47

up with a plan through someone who is

45:49

disinterested like a receiver to assess

45:51

both the accounts the vouchers the

45:55

physical plant and come up with a longer

45:57

term plan how to do it ultimately it

46:00

probably has a sale but frankly if

46:02

that's going to be HUD the receiver the

46:04

city and Court coming up with that but

46:08

ultimately right now HUD has the

46:09

approval of any purchaser the receiver's

46:12

original proposal in ter of the court is

46:15

not to sell the property but to assess

46:17

and get a manager and come up with a

46:19

plan to recover that property and put it

46:21

back into Service as a a low and

46:23

moderate income facility

46:29

all right um I have a couple of

46:31

questions but I'll I'll wait a little

46:33

bit um I'm going to start to my far

46:35

right ha with councilwoman Daniels do

46:37

you have any questions or

46:39

comments uh no thank you thank you

46:42

councilwoman Davis any questions or

46:46

comments thank you vice president green

46:48

no questions at this time thank you

46:51

president BS questions or comments I

46:53

don't have any questions uh related to

46:55

exhibit B I would like to offer an

46:58

amendment to the resolution as a whole

47:01

though um I would like

47:04

to um amend the document to add uh

47:09

funding from the municipal host fee um

47:15

$59,000 um as an allocation to the

47:17

Harrisburg Youth Sports

47:20

Association um I will have the language

47:23

and representation from uh the

47:26

Harrisburg Sports Association um during

47:29

our legislative session so I would like

47:31

to um suspend the rules for further

47:35

discussion then but I did want to just

47:37

note uh for the record that I will be

47:40

offering an amendment to um the

47:43

resolution thank you very much uh

47:45

councilwoman

47:46

Ross thank you vice president green um I

47:50

don't have questions I think just the

47:52

situation is disheartening for the

47:54

residents that's just

47:57

a concern of mine I mean that I don't

47:59

know I just wish there was more we could

48:03

do you know so I I think that's just my

48:06

biggest concern right now but I um I

48:09

would hope the receivership since they

48:11

don't have any ties either way um would

48:15

be able to help with this because there

48:16

are residents just living in real time

48:19

of disheartening conditions so um and we

48:23

would end up with a presentation for you

48:25

from the receiver as well approves them

48:27

but my understanding is they have about

48:28

a thousand units now under management

48:31

that are both commercial and residential

48:33

and buried in in in their youth so they

48:35

at least they have they have 25 people

48:37

in their employee they are very on the

48:40

ground experienced people okay um

48:42

frankly the city has gotten calls from

48:44

all over once we say we're going to do

48:45

this people offering to say they'd be

48:47

great at this from Vegas from New York

48:51

Jersey we the mayor the administration I

48:53

think the council they want someone

48:55

local who knows where to find a a sink

48:58

on a Saturday morning you know and and

49:00

who can install it who can get it done

49:02

for these people and that's what so we

49:04

wanted someone local on the ground who

49:05

knows the markets knows the most knows

49:07

where to buy things and it just isn't

49:09

going to be tied up in a lot of nonsense

49:10

no I agree I think

49:13

um I love out of town Out of Towners I

49:16

have nothing against anybody that's out

49:18

of town but we have so many issues

49:21

already with just out of town landlords

49:24

and property managers and um it's just

49:26

just really been um tough on our

49:29

residents so I I'm going please somebody

49:32

local please for the sake of those

49:34

residents and for a city that this this

49:37

project is just you know way too huge to

49:41

have anybody from out of town but I'm

49:42

sure you got inquiries from everywhere

49:45

everywhere so yeah but no thank you

49:48

that's

49:49

it thank you very much councilman rodri

49:52

councilman Rodriguez excuse me thank you

49:54

madam vice president um I pretty much

49:57

Echo those sentiments I think sometimes

49:59

just finding someone isn't good enough

50:02

we got to make sure it's not only the

50:03

right and qualified individual entity is

50:06

someone that has the heart and passion

50:08

CU we could be looking at the same

50:10

scenario 10 years down the line you know

50:12

if we're just talking about tax credits

50:13

or a quick benefit or a quick exchange

50:16

you know I just as Council will raw said

50:20

um Madam president has been up there as

50:22

have have I and I've seen condemned

50:25

homes condemn homes with babies still

50:27

living in them I've seen you know where

50:30

they're expected to still pay the rent

50:31

and there the bricks aren't finished on

50:33

the home you know is disheartening even

50:35

to the amenities I've run into a few

50:38

diabetic patients that have to put their

50:40

medicine in a cooler it's just not the

50:43

way you know our residents should live

50:45

um so although it's a difficult

50:47

situation my heart goes out to those at

50:49

Governor Square and um just hope we

50:52

could push past and to the exhibit uh

50:54

Madame President has referred to for the

50:56

amendment I too support that Amendment

50:58

um no further questions thank you very

51:01

much councilman Jones yes

51:05

um I I can say I Echo that with everyone

51:08

else said too um being that um you know

51:11

I will say this um you know early on

51:14

that you know the struggle that they

51:15

were having up there and I was trying to

51:17

get those uh places those vacant places

51:20

boarded up I'm glad to see that they are

51:23

now um with one of the initiatives where

51:25

I had the community come out we cut the

51:26

grass they seem to been able to maintain

51:29

that as well now my question for the

51:32

residents and viewers that are are

51:33

watching or maybe will check this out at

51:36

some point can you share what will

51:38

happen to those individuals because I

51:40

think that was part of the big thing

51:41

that no one you couldn't sell it because

51:43

someone would have to make sure that

51:45

those residents were moved and taken

51:48

care of until it was uh back up to cold

51:52

and and and being able to you know

51:55

occupy that space again so I can speak

51:57

in two ways to that okay um first is is

52:00

first there's going to be a plan on how

52:01

to restore what's there um and that I

52:05

don't want to pregu the people that have

52:07

the qualifications to put that plan

52:09

together or the Court's approval of it

52:11

right it's going to they're going to ask

52:12

about funding credentials licensing all

52:14

those things but under the federal

52:17

uniform relocation act if your facility

52:20

is supported by federal funds and for a

52:24

temporary basis or permanent basis you

52:27

were going to relocate someone and I

52:28

think the important word here is

52:31

temporary that so you can go into that

52:33

unit and repair it for them there is a

52:36

payment that has to be made to that

52:37

tenant here the one good thing about how

52:40

bad this is is that there are so many

52:43

empty units that if they'll have places

52:46

that are fixed so they can go fix the

52:48

ones people are in so it's nearly not

52:50

putting anyone in a hotel at this point

52:53

there's no there's no again it's not

52:55

going to be my plan it's not going to be

52:57

the council's plan but there's been no

52:58

talk of that it seems there's enough

53:00

facilities there as they get them back

53:03

up and occupiable and get an occupancy

53:05

permit that would be available to use

53:07

for the people that are there

53:09

temporarily as they get their unit back

53:11

up and probably they would have the

53:12

option of staying in that new unit if

53:14

they wanted that right you know that

53:16

that'll be there'll be options then but

53:17

I don't want to second guess the

53:18

management of this thing right right and

53:20

I don't want to second guess HUD I don't

53:21

want to second guess the well that

53:23

that's not that's not my aim here it's

53:25

just more so um in for residents because

53:27

you know we all

53:29

been figuring trying to figure out

53:31

what's going to happen with the people

53:32

there so um if you're if you're just

53:36

again that that sounds like something

53:37

that may be feasible but then I also

53:39

will have question that once we do get

53:41

that information will we be able to

53:42

share that so we can report out to the

53:44

community or there would be something on

53:46

the website for them to see so all of

53:48

this is going to be public it's going to

53:49

be supervised by a court right who has

53:52

no interest in the outcome other than to

53:54

make sure this place gets back up and

53:56

run running right the condition of

53:58

receivership which Under Pennsylvania

53:59

law is temporary is that it expires when

54:03

the property becomes um code compliant

54:06

right so the objective is to bring it up

54:08

to building code and health and safety

54:09

code and that would be the how

54:12

receivership expir and that's when

54:13

somebody probably look to swoop in in

54:15

right and grab it I'm sure long before

54:17

that lots of people want to buy it but

54:19

that money but i' say no one wants to

54:21

pay for what they should pay and the

54:23

city has taken a pretty hard line

54:26

there's been frankly a lot of Bottom

54:28

Feeders trying to get this and seems

54:30

like they would just let it go until it

54:32

was no longer required to be kept

54:34

affordable housing right right and so

54:36

we've been pting back pushing back very

54:38

hard that the city needs low and

54:40

moderate income housing desperately and

54:42

we can't afford to lose this much

54:44

property to absolutely Market look's

54:46

that 220 222 units yeah yeah so so the

54:50

the last thing I would ask too for not

54:52

just for myself but for the residents as

54:54

well those ones that are still in I want

54:57

to say squatting what's is is there a

55:00

plan for that that's beyond my thinking

55:03

that's why you need a property manager

55:05

comes in how to deal with it right and

55:07

then you and I I don't want to get into

55:08

the technicalities of squatting whether

55:10

there's property rights tenancy rights I

55:12

got you I got you you don't want to give

55:15

out all right that's all I have thank

55:18

you thank you very much um I do have a a

55:22

couple of questions uh first I guess

55:25

would be what will be the process

55:26

process of finding the receiver like

55:27

what would be the process that the city

55:29

would go through I've already found the

55:30

receiver the Mayor found the receiver

55:32

the first people that we've informally

55:35

talked to both most of them just shook

55:36

their head and said no um the people

55:39

from Property Maintenance were U Midtown

55:41

property main were very enthusiastic

55:44

they consider it part of their Community

55:46

part of their town they would like the

55:47

chance to make help make this right they

55:50

were seemed very very enthusiastic uh

55:53

they did accompany us to court uh about

55:55

it um and again they have they've

55:58

expanded to about a thousand units

55:59

already managing and they know the area

56:03

um and you know and in the end I think

56:05

improving this location helps them with

56:07

their locations right it just does and

56:10

it helps everybody um and so uh you know

56:14

the the always the devil's going to be

56:16

in the details right and uh I don't know

56:19

if a court will have its own

56:21

unique uh conditions it puts on it

56:23

that's going to be up to the court um I

56:25

don't know if

56:26

if it exists by the end of the year uh

56:29

it has its own conditions that they put

56:31

on to it um the you know the uh but

56:35

right now their requirements are it's a

56:38

check box of things you have to meet and

56:40

no one who had put in uh that claimed

56:44

that they were that the owner's claim

56:46

was a successful bidder none of them the

56:48

last I talked how had ever submitted the

56:50

paperwork to Hut they sub a request to

56:52

get the paperwork they couldn't they

56:54

could not come up with a recovery plan

56:56

which is one of Hud's requirements you

56:58

had a full recovery plan for the entire

57:00

property in order to be able to take it

57:02

over and that receiver will help put

57:05

together whether that becomes their plan

57:07

or a potential owner's plan you know

57:09

that's yet to be

57:10

seen okay all right uh and then my other

57:14

question was uh funding source um it it

57:18

shows here in the resolution it says

57:20

that

57:22

um we appropriated the amount of okay

57:25

where is the program funds described in

57:27

resolution 17 of 2024 is amended and

57:29

reauthorized in resolution 5 of 2025 is

57:32

amended or appropriated in the amount of

57:34

$8 million for affordable housing what

57:37

shall be the source of funding is that

57:38

the arpa funding the original arpa money

57:40

that's now in the state grant program

57:42

funding so that is the uh that is the

57:45

source of the

57:46

$250,000 okay um I think everyone should

57:49

be braced that it's going to be a lot

57:50

more than that right as time goes on um

57:53

but with the condition that as they get

57:56

the place to a positive cash flow Andor

57:59

sale the city will then get its funding

58:01

back into that state grant program okay

58:05

so it's we're looking to be able to

58:06

recover the funding at some point all

58:08

right um and I guess it was just

58:11

confusing just because of the way it's

58:13

written in the addendum that we were

58:16

given uh it's just written as grants to

58:18

local units and so I wanted to make sure

58:21

it was clear that it was coming out of

58:22

the arpa fund because in the resolution

58:24

here it seems pretty pretty clear to me

58:26

where it's coming from but in the agenda

58:28

we were given it says grants to local

58:30

units if you if you look up at line

58:32

three it says state grants

58:37

fund okay all right thank you I help any

58:42

other

58:43

questions I just had a clarification um

58:47

solicitor Grover I'm not sure if you

58:49

said it I thought you did but I think

58:50

you said they already had found kind of

58:52

a receiver that the mayor did Midtown

58:54

property Midtown Town Property

58:56

Maintenance okay but that but that

58:59

Corporation will open a separate LLC

59:02

which will formally be the one allowed

59:03

to manage the receivership oh okay I see

59:06

but they're still going through the

59:08

process like when what are the next

59:10

steps where we say okay they're

59:12

definitely the receivers like what's

59:14

going to the court says it right so so

59:16

we have the petition in front of the

59:17

court already if we had our funding and

59:19

we had our stipulation with the

59:20

stakeholders the judge would have signed

59:22

it at the very first day we were there

59:24

but we need one fund

59:26

uh we did not want to if the council

59:28

decided funding was inappropriate there

59:30

we we'd have to withdraw the petition

59:33

right and two if if the stakeholders

59:35

aren't in agreement of the terms it just

59:38

we're not here to litigate about

59:40

receivership you know that we're just

59:42

not going to spend taxpayers money

59:43

fighting on this private property uh to

59:46

make their lives better they have

59:48

they've cost us an awful lot of time and

59:49

money um so we're just trying to get a a

59:52

stipulation as we did in bankruptcy

59:54

court uh that the judge can then review

59:57

if he's good with it sign off and then

59:59

the receiver would be appointed

1:00:01

instantly and then they would have

1:00:02

either you know a 90 or 180-day window

1:00:05

to come up with a recovery plan to

1:00:07

assess the property to assess the

1:00:09

accounts which is important to us to

1:00:12

hire the property manager because he's

1:00:13

going to be the receiver um and Property

1:00:16

Management has to be approved by Hud

1:00:18

under their conditions has to be a

1:00:19

qualified HUD property manager um and uh

1:00:23

and so there's a lot of steps a lot of

1:00:29

yes thank you for that breakdown I was

1:00:30

wondering what the process was now that

1:00:32

we've now that the mayor Administration

1:00:35

found so when they want to be the

1:00:36

receiver what were the next steps just

1:00:38

so anybody who's listening and for us to

1:00:40

know this is what's happening right now

1:00:42

so thank you there'll be public other

1:00:44

public meetings on it as we get moving I

1:00:46

hope so yeah thank you for that sure

1:00:49

that's it for me thank you vice

1:00:50

president green thank you are there any

1:00:53

other questions comments concerns

1:00:57

seeing none I will recommend this move

1:00:59

to our next legislative agenda and that

1:01:01

concludes the business of the budget and

1:01:03

finance

1:01:04

committee thank you vice president green

1:01:07

the final committee business this

1:01:09

evening lies with the community and

1:01:12

economic development committee I will

1:01:14

defer to our chair uh councilwoman

1:01:17

Daniels to lead

1:01:20

discussion thank you um Mr Parker could

1:01:23

you read um uh resolution 13 He 2025

1:01:28

into the record

1:01:29

please yes Bill three of

1:01:34

2025 an ordinance amending the city of

1:01:36

harrisburg's official zoning map to

1:01:39

change the parcel zoning designation of

1:01:41

640 Al alrick Street to the industrial

1:01:46

IND zone of the residential medium

1:01:49

density RM Zone pursuant to chapter

1:01:53

7-33 of the codified order es of the

1:01:56

city of

1:01:59

Harrisburg thank you is there someone

1:02:02

representing the city and who could give

1:02:04

us a brief history of this resolution uh

1:02:07

yes uh good uh evening Council Jeffrey

1:02:09

Knight planning director with the city

1:02:11

could you speak into the microphone I

1:02:12

can't hear you yes uh Jeffrey Knight

1:02:14

planning director with the

1:02:15

city that

1:02:19

better it's a little better but the

1:02:21

sound is muffled for some reason all

1:02:24

right uh I'll try to make sure I speak

1:02:27

up that's that's why

1:02:29

better uh so the um application before

1:02:33

uh the council tonight uh is more of a

1:02:36

corrective action um than anything else

1:02:38

uh when the current zoning code and

1:02:41

zoning map were developed between 2008

1:02:43

and

1:02:44

2010 um at the time they had included uh

1:02:49

642 and I believe uh or sorry 640 and

1:02:52

642 I believe all Rick Street um which

1:02:55

are on the north side of all Rick Street

1:02:56

in the industrial uh zoning District uh

1:02:58

the property uh behind them and uh the

1:03:01

property just to the east were both in

1:03:03

the industrial district their auto

1:03:05

repair shops they probably had were like

1:03:07

that uh back when the map was developed

1:03:09

and it was probably more an issue of

1:03:11

just grouping whole properties within a

1:03:13

block uh into a single zoning District

1:03:16

um so the owner of the property uh came

1:03:19

to uh the city um actually the uh

1:03:22

realtor for the owner uh came to the

1:03:25

city and expressed that uh having a

1:03:29

zoning designation which did permit uh

1:03:33

the um a single family dwelling as a

1:03:35

byright use uh was either necessary for

1:03:38

them to uh sell the property or would uh

1:03:41

greatly assist uh in the property uh

1:03:44

sale process um and uh as noted uh a

1:03:49

single family dwelling is not permitted

1:03:50

by right in the industrial district um

1:03:53

so uh the the property owner uh through

1:03:56

their realtor did request uh that this

1:03:59

property be rezoned uh to residential

1:04:01

medium density which does permit uh by

1:04:03

right uh single family um dwelling uh

1:04:07

and so this is a relatively

1:04:08

straightforward um application

1:04:10

relatively straightforward proposal it's

1:04:12

a little different than maybe what some

1:04:14

of the other zoning map amendments that

1:04:16

Council has seen in recent years where

1:04:18

we've got somebody maybe looking to do

1:04:19

something in a property that's um you

1:04:22

know maybe zoned appropriately but the

1:04:23

building on site or the property itself

1:04:25

uh um you know accommodates other types

1:04:27

of uses this is more as I said a

1:04:30

corrective action um to address what was

1:04:32

you know a minor oversight uh when the

1:04:34

map was initially developed um and uh

1:04:38

with that all being said uh the Planning

1:04:41

Commission recommended that city council

1:04:43

approve the request for the following

1:04:45

reasons the subject property is adjacent

1:04:47

to and representative of Residential

1:04:49

Properties to the South uh which are

1:04:51

located in the residential medium

1:04:52

density zoning District meaning that

1:04:54

uses permitted by the new zoning

1:04:56

District would not be contrary to the

1:04:58

character of the neighborhood and would

1:04:59

includes th include those which could

1:05:02

otherwise be established in adjacent

1:05:04

properties uh the property appears to

1:05:06

have been incorrectly zoned as

1:05:07

industrial by previous City staff an

1:05:09

error propagated during the 2014 review

1:05:12

and Adoption of the current zoning code

1:05:13

and map the property is and always has

1:05:15

been residential yet the current zoning

1:05:17

designation would not permit such use by

1:05:19

right uh and finally the applicant has

1:05:21

provided evidence and testimony

1:05:22

documenting that the current industrial

1:05:25

zoning District adversely impacts the

1:05:27

value and salability of the

1:05:31

property thank you so I just I looked at

1:05:34

the that area and is that the only unit

1:05:38

that's uh industrial or there other

1:05:41

homes in that on that street that are

1:05:44

industrial as well that we need to fix

1:05:46

uh well so it I believe the um structure

1:05:49

uh directly to the east uh which I

1:05:51

believe is 642 uh alri Street um is also

1:05:56

um located in the industrial district

1:05:59

however we usually want to wait to have

1:06:02

a property owner uh bring this to us uh

1:06:05

because the owner of that property may

1:06:08

choose to sell their property to

1:06:09

somebody um who is uh proposing a use

1:06:13

that is permitted by right in the

1:06:14

industrial district um so they may want

1:06:17

to combine it with the adjacent Parcels

1:06:19

just to the east there or maybe they

1:06:21

want to run an auto repair shop out of

1:06:23

that and they would like to you know or

1:06:25

either they or a future property owner

1:06:26

would like to do that so they prefer to

1:06:28

keep the industrial district um so we

1:06:30

don't want to um necessarily speak uh

1:06:32

for the property owner um in a case like

1:06:34

this and if they did come to us we would

1:06:37

um of course recommend support uh for

1:06:40

such a proposal um using the same

1:06:42

justification as we are doing in this

1:06:44

case um but we do want that to be the

1:06:47

decision of a current or future property

1:06:51

owner um so is this is six 42 a brick

1:06:57

home or is it a white cinder block

1:07:00

looking

1:07:02

building

1:07:05

um the property to the um directly to

1:07:08

the east is a two and a half story brick

1:07:14

residence okay um have we ever done a

1:07:18

resoning

1:07:21

for pardon me I okay n just looking at

1:07:26

the geography it's obvious to me that

1:07:29

the GIS mapping like missed a little

1:07:32

piece and that's how it fell into this

1:07:34

industrial zoning category but if we

1:07:36

could fix a problem for a bunch of

1:07:40

people at once rather than peac mailing

1:07:43

it um because I mean like I doubt

1:07:46

someone wants a mechanic shop like right

1:07:49

next right next to

1:07:51

them so um well I

1:07:55

somewhat ironically there is you kind of

1:07:58

understand what what I'm trying to

1:08:00

communicate and I'm not articulating it

1:08:02

really well but um yeah I I do kind of

1:08:06

understand you're saying that yeah if we

1:08:07

could solve a problem more

1:08:10

broadly with this

1:08:12

bill I think we should well I guess what

1:08:15

I would say to that is um this was only

1:08:20

a problem because the current property

1:08:21

owner considered it a problem if the

1:08:23

owner of the adjacent property intends

1:08:25

to live there for 20 years and they

1:08:27

don't really care that their property is

1:08:28

owned industrial because they're going

1:08:29

to continue living there as a legal

1:08:31

non-conforming uh use on site that's

1:08:34

fine um if they again if they did want

1:08:36

to come to us but I don't know that um

1:08:38

the city should necessarily be in the

1:08:41

position to say like okay we're g to do

1:08:44

an action that your neighbor is doing

1:08:46

just because we think it makes sense uh

1:08:48

we we'd like to allow the property owner

1:08:51

to come to us uh with a proposal of that

1:08:53

nature

1:08:56

yeah but we kind of have to be uniform

1:08:58

and consistent and we tend to I mean you

1:09:01

know the the spot zoning is always a

1:09:04

little bit

1:09:06

questionable um I don't know uh could

1:09:09

law buo give us a little bit more

1:09:11

feedback on this like between now and

1:09:14

next

1:09:15

Tuesday um and is the applicant present

1:09:18

and uh and if they are could you just

1:09:21

give us a little bit of the issues that

1:09:23

you're facing it it is my understanding

1:09:25

talk to the broker the applicant may be

1:09:27

infirmed U and it's not actually in the

1:09:29

house right now but cannot sell it um

1:09:32

because it's it's zoned industrial but

1:09:35

let me say you cannot vote on this next

1:09:37

week There's a whole series of

1:09:38

requirements for public advertising a

1:09:40

public hearing has to be held um the

1:09:43

property has to be reposted so on those

1:09:46

things and and our office is working

1:09:47

with the clerk's office for the schedule

1:09:50

we have got an extension agreement with

1:09:52

the on behalf of the property owner to

1:09:54

be done by April 30th I think or April

1:09:57

28th so um we will we will give uh the

1:10:00

council at least what the advertising

1:10:02

requirements are it's a special ad with

1:10:04

more detail than usual you did one of

1:10:06

these two or three years ago maybe and

1:10:09

TI I can speak to the details I haven't

1:10:11

been into the details I will note spot

1:10:14

zoning is the government doing it as

1:10:16

opposed to the property owner doing it

1:10:19

so the idea that we would pick something

1:10:21

and say it should be this as opposed to

1:10:23

an applicant who's allowed to make an

1:10:25

applicant a property owner that is the

1:10:26

difference like a spot zoning and the

1:10:29

right to request a zoning map change for

1:10:31

your property um if we were just picking

1:10:34

properties out one by one for spot

1:10:36

zoning it would be a different issue um

1:10:39

we could treat this whole thing as a

1:10:42

correction um and that would take a

1:10:43

different

1:10:44

evaluation um but that would we are on a

1:10:48

clock with the current application so I

1:10:50

don't know if we could do both at the

1:10:51

same time but here I can speak to the

1:10:53

advertisement

1:10:57

uh yes the statute actually I believe

1:10:59

chapter 7

1:11:01

303.15 requires initially that 30 days

1:11:05

before the public hearing there needs to

1:11:07

be a posting on the perimeter of 640 a

1:11:10

street as well as uh certified first

1:11:14

class mailing sent to any other

1:11:15

surrounding Property

1:11:17

Owners um after that um there has to be

1:11:21

a special posting two consecutive weeks

1:11:25

um the first publish the first posting

1:11:27

not being more than 30 days before the

1:11:31

last posting not being no less than

1:11:33

seven days so um like I said we can work

1:11:38

with you together um I assume we would

1:11:41

work in collaboration with Mr Knight for

1:11:43

the postings and um we can assure that

1:11:46

you can pick out a timeline that either

1:11:49

works with your current sessions to have

1:11:53

like a public meeting right before one

1:11:54

of the sessions or if you decided to

1:11:57

just have a whole another public hearing

1:11:59

you know whatever dates that you want to

1:12:01

do we can ensure that your postings and

1:12:04

your

1:12:05

publishings um fall in line with the

1:12:12

chapter and actually I think speaking to

1:12:15

what councilwoman Daniel says right now

1:12:17

that chapter actually requires that the

1:12:20

property owner apply to because oh and

1:12:24

sorry after this

1:12:25

the after the public meeting if the

1:12:28

public meeting if at that time if the

1:12:30

proposed amendment is changed in any way

1:12:32

you would then have to repost and have

1:12:34

an additional public meeting if not you

1:12:38

have 30 days to um send the resolution

1:12:42

over to Dolphin County and then the

1:12:46

actual zoning map gets amended

1:12:52

so okay um so I'll open it up for

1:12:56

questions um I'll start to my left

1:12:59

councilwoman

1:13:00

Davis oh thank you councilwoman Daniels

1:13:04

I don't have any questions thank

1:13:07

you thank you vice president bre thank

1:13:09

you I don't have any

1:13:12

questions uh president Bowers I don't

1:13:15

have any questions I just look forward

1:13:17

to working with the law Bureau and Mr

1:13:19

night on a clear schedule moving forward

1:13:22

thank you

1:13:25

councilwoman Ross thank you I'm

1:13:27

councilwoman Daniels um just a small

1:13:30

question um because what councilwoman

1:13:32

Daniels was saying I I do partially

1:13:35

agree with her especially with not peac

1:13:37

Milling it but if there's other

1:13:39

properties that are also in this

1:13:41

industrial district being able to put

1:13:42

them in the um medium residential medium

1:13:45

dis um

1:13:47

density um portion of the zoning map so

1:13:50

I was wondering when we do the public

1:13:53

comments or the public engage

1:13:55

and the meetings does the information

1:13:59

say or ask other residents if you feel

1:14:01

like you're in also this industrial

1:14:03

district or if you are if you would like

1:14:05

to then be a part of the residential

1:14:07

medium density District or not District

1:14:10

but zoning um does it allow them that

1:14:13

chance to do that I'm just just a little

1:14:15

clarification on what that I'm I'm

1:14:18

assuming the point of them of us having

1:14:20

to let the surrounding Property Owners

1:14:22

know what's happening would then be time

1:14:25

for them to be able to come forward and

1:14:26

say you know what I want to do that too

1:14:29

that's what I was or I don't or why I

1:14:31

don't want them to do it you know what I

1:14:32

mean but so that is the point of the

1:14:35

surrounding Property Owners being

1:14:36

involved because it's their neighborhood

1:14:39

so at that time I would think they would

1:14:41

say oh well this is a process I follow

1:14:43

if I want to get that done as well okay

1:14:46

that's what I needed clarification on I

1:14:48

thought and figure that was the reason

1:14:50

but I didn't want to assume because I

1:14:53

also think let's not peace mil if we can

1:14:55

get more um residents who would like to

1:14:58

change their zoning that would make

1:14:59

complete sense instead of them coming

1:15:01

back one at a time so um thank you for

1:15:04

answering that question that allows me

1:15:05

to make a sound

1:15:08

decision thank you thank you um

1:15:11

councilwoman Daniels

1:15:13

sorry that's okay thank you uh

1:15:15

councilwoman Rodriguez thank you madam

1:15:17

chair um thank you Mr Jeff for being

1:15:19

here as always uh what would qualify a

1:15:23

um a home or someone request for the

1:15:25

medium density Zone what what would

1:15:27

qualify that um so I mean the this uh

1:15:31

property owner could have asked for

1:15:33

perhaps any uh zoning designation change

1:15:35

it to downtown Center if they wanted to

1:15:37

I think in that case that's what I would

1:15:39

consider spot zoning is there specific

1:15:40

like density or per capita that needs to

1:15:43

be in the equation so uh our current

1:15:46

zoning code only really has two uh

1:15:48

uniquely residential or specifically

1:15:50

residential zoning districts there

1:15:52

residential low density and residential

1:15:53

medium density uh we only have two

1:15:55

sections of residential low density

1:15:57

Academy Manor um up along Northern

1:15:59

Harrisburg and then Bel Park out in East

1:16:02

Harrisburg everything else whether

1:16:03

you're um you know kind of duplexes or

1:16:06

row homes is residential medium density

1:16:08

um I think there was like a residential

1:16:10

high density at one point in a previous

1:16:11

version of the zoning code that got

1:16:12

stripped out so it just kind of

1:16:14

flattened it all out pretty standard RM

1:16:16

District yeah so if you're almost any

1:16:18

home you're going to Pro and you are not

1:16:20

RM and you want to be more conforming to

1:16:23

what your property is you would ask for

1:16:24

an RM

1:16:25

okay great and then the amendment

1:16:27

application uh you had mentioned that

1:16:30

the tenant was enabled at the time is

1:16:32

this being done on behalf of like the

1:16:35

property owner or

1:16:36

realtor so it's not the actual like

1:16:39

tenant per se oh no so the property

1:16:41

owner uh has requested through the

1:16:43

realtor I think to Mr Grover's Point um

1:16:46

the property owner might be a little

1:16:47

infirm so I think the realtor's handing

1:16:49

handling a lot of this stuff uh for her

1:16:52

um I I think she has been included on

1:16:54

some of the communications he's aware of

1:16:55

what's going on so the property owner is

1:16:57

the one that put in the amendment

1:16:58

application correct okay yeah this is

1:17:00

not done on behalf of the property owner

1:17:01

by the realtor and just for council's

1:17:03

edification with that application

1:17:05

according to uh 73031 five the zoning

1:17:09

code Amendment uh subsection B would say

1:17:12

they would need to have the statement of

1:17:13

why the change would be in the interest

1:17:14

of the city including uh conformance

1:17:17

with the city's comprehensive plan and

1:17:18

neighborhood plans two a statement

1:17:20

addressing any adverse effects on

1:17:22

adjacent properties three a state

1:17:25

addressing any major traffic access or

1:17:27

congestion concerns four a map showing

1:17:30

the proposed boundaries of any proposed

1:17:32

map changes the existing zoning of the

1:17:34

subject land and adj excuse me adjacent

1:17:37

lands and the current use of the

1:17:38

adjacent Lots five completion of the

1:17:41

zoning text Amendment application or

1:17:43

zoning map Amendment application and of

1:17:45

course six the payment uh fees as set

1:17:48

forth and to the Publications uh public

1:17:51

notice shall be published once week uh

1:17:53

for two consecutive weeks in the newsp

1:17:54

paper or general circulation the first

1:17:57

publication shall not be more than 30

1:17:58

days and the second publication shall be

1:18:00

less than 7 days from the date of the

1:18:02

hearing for the zoning map amendments

1:18:05

public notice shall also include the

1:18:07

posting of a sign at conspicuous

1:18:09

locations along with the perimeter of

1:18:11

the subject property at the first class

1:18:12

mailling of the public notice shall be

1:18:14

set all current property owners who own

1:18:16

Parcels within the area proposed to be

1:18:18

reson at least 30 days prior to the

1:18:20

hearing by city council and number four

1:18:23

if any public hearings held upon on an

1:18:25

amendment the proposed amendment is

1:18:26

changed substantially or revised to

1:18:28

include the land previously not affected

1:18:31

by it the city council shall hold

1:18:33

another public hearing pursuant to

1:18:35

public notice before proceedings to vote

1:18:37

on the amendment so just wanted to make

1:18:39

sure they had the application in and to

1:18:41

council's point we were following

1:18:43

everything to statute yes and they

1:18:45

presented um to planning and were

1:18:48

approved and also to Dolphin County as

1:18:50

well with that application perfect um is

1:18:52

there any way Council can get a look at

1:18:55

their application answers um I believe

1:18:57

that was included in the pack that is in

1:18:59

there yeah okay perfect perfect if not

1:19:02

that would be great thank you we can

1:19:04

forward the package awesome thank you no

1:19:05

further

1:19:07

questions thank you councilman

1:19:09

Jones no

1:19:12

questions thank you so um Jeff I'll

1:19:16

connect with you um at some point and

1:19:19

then president Bowers will coordinate

1:19:22

scheduling sounds good

1:19:26

and that concludes the business of the

1:19:27

community and economic development

1:19:29

committee thank Youk you thank you uh we

1:19:33

will now move forward with our meeting

1:19:35

agenda next we have public comment uh

1:19:39

just a few housekeeping notes before we

1:19:41

begin please state your name and your

1:19:43

address for the meeting record if you

1:19:46

don't feel comfortable sharing your

1:19:47

address please share the vicinity in

1:19:49

which you live within the city you'll

1:19:51

have four minutes to share your comments

1:19:53

Mr Parker

1:19:55

will serve as our timekeeper I'll begin

1:19:57

to my right is there anyone that would

1:20:00

like to offer public

1:20:01

comment seeing and hearing no one anyone

1:20:04

in the middle section okay seeing and

1:20:07

hearing no one anyone to my left seeing

1:20:11

and hearing no one the time is 6:50 p.m.

1:20:14

I will entertain a motion to a journ

1:20:17

don't move is there a second a second

1:20:19

thank you we stand a journ

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.