Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Legislative Session 04/17/2024

1:37:49935 summary words · ~5 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 14, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

Harrisburg City Council approved key funding adjustments to protect pool restoration funds and advanced green space projects, but held a contentious resolution on the Broad Street Market reconstruction manager in committee due to concerns over procurement equity, scoring transparency, and minority business participation.

This session highlights critical debates around local government procurement equity, the allocation of federal ARPA funds for community pools, and how community development projects balance developer qualifications with local and diverse business opportunities.

Section summaries

0:00-4:54

Caucus & Meeting Overview

skip

Council coordinates the night's agenda, noting that Resolution 25 is tabled to May 14th. The special legislative session is formally called to order with roll call, invocation, and the pledge of allegiance.

Administrative setup and scheduling details that are fully resolved later in the meeting.

4:54-12:15

Public Comment on Ceasefire Lobbying & Free Speech

optional

Resident Brian Keyling addresses council regarding an email sent by the Jewish Federation CEO attempting to block legal pro-Palestine advocacy and claiming private influence over the solicitor and council's ceasefire resolution agenda. Keyling urges council to maintain transparency and protect first amendment rights.

Highly dramatic public comment reflecting local political tensions, though not directly related to the evening's voted legislative items.

12:15-17:09

Administration & Website Redesign

watch

President Bowers reads the Administration Committee report, detailing the Q1 report from the Office of Equity and Compliance and the website redesign project under Resolution 21. Revised Software Systems was selected from 32 bidders to redesign and host the city's website for improved accessibility and security by late 2024.

Explains the procurement process and timeline for a major, approved infrastructure upgrade to the city's public digital face.

17:09-19:36

Budget Allocations for Community Pools

watch

Vice President Green presents the Budget and Finance report on Resolution 24. She introduces an innovative amendment to fund immediate $55,000 repairs for the Jackson Lick pool by defunding delayed capital road projects instead of stripping money from the $1.945M ARPA allocation for the South Harrisburg pool project.

Critical discussion on how the city collaboratively managed municipal funds to save two community pools.

19:36-31:51

Public Safety, Codes, Health & Parks Reports

optional

Council reviews Q1 performance reports for the Bureau of Police, Bureau of Codes, Bureau of Fire, and Public Health. The committee also discusses Resolution 22 (Swatara Street Park grant), highlighting a partnership model where local community groups and ministries will share rotating maintenance duties.

Offers granular municipal service metrics and community park details that are useful but not central to the primary procurement debate.

31:51-46:33

Resolutions 21-24 Votes & Budget Amendments

watch

Council votes to pass Resolution 21 (website redesign) and Resolution 23 (PennDOT signee). The council suspends rules to formally adopt the budget amendment for Resolution 24, routing the $55,000 for Jackson Lick pool out of delayed capital road projects to preserve ARPA funding for the South Harrisburg pool.

Captures the formal approval and cooperative debate regarding municipal finance.

46:33-1:33:06

Broad Street Market CM RFP Debate

watch

Council suspends the rules to debate Resolution 26, appointing Alexander Building Construction as the Broad Street Market's red brick building reconstruction manager. A tense Q&A ensues over why a higher bidder was chosen, how the grading rubric was scaled, and why the Office of Equity and Compliance was excluded from the selection panel, leading to a discussion on systemic barriers facing minority contractors.

The core highlight of the meeting, illustrating intense governance debates around procurement equity, supplier diversity, and administrative transparency.

1:33:06-1:35:33

Reconsiderations & Adjournment

watch

Chair Ross holds Resolution 26 in committee to allow council to inspect the RFP packets. Councilwoman Davis moves to reconsider and subsequently approve Resolution 22 (Swatara Street Park grant) in a 5-0 vote. Local Earth Day festivities are announced, and the meeting is adjourned.

Captures the final legislative outcomes of the night, including the park grant approval and the decision to freeze the market contract.

Key points

  • Procurement Equity and the Broad Street Market Rehabilitation — The council held Resolution 26 in committee to review the RFP selection process of Alexander Building Construction as the construction manager for the fire-damaged Broad Street Market. Council members raised significant concerns regarding why a higher-priced firm was selected over lower-bidding competitors and why the City's Office of Equity and Compliance was not represented on the scoring panel.
  • Creative Budgeting Protects South Harrisburg Pool ARPA Funds — Vice President Green negotiated a budget amendment for Resolution 24, shifting $55,000 for Jackson Lick pool repairs away from ARPA funds to an inactive capital road projects fund. This creative maneuver ensures that the full $1.945M ARPA allocation remains dedicated exclusively to Phase 1 of the South Harrisburg pool project.
  • Local Resistance to Top-Down Advocacy and Lobbying — Public comment by Brian Keyling criticized behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts by the Jewish Federation CEO, who allegedly claimed influence over the council's agenda regarding a Palestine ceasefire resolution. Keyling emphasized that the local Jewish community is highly diverse and warned against undemocratic, non-transparent attempts to suppress legal public advocacy.
  • Community-Driven Greenspaces: The Swatara Street Park — Council approved a DCNR grant application (Resolution 22) for the Swatara Street Park in South Allison Hill, utilizing a unique community-partnership model where local homeowners associations and ministries will share rotating maintenance duties after an initial 5-year grant period.
I don't want my hard-earned tax dollars to be wasted on lawsuits where my own rights were violated I'd rather my rights not be violated and my tax dollars go to addressing the very real problems our city faces Brian Keyling
I just want to thank you both for working on that today... and trying to find it coming out of other Appropriations that as you said we don't um need have a need for at the moment and don't see one in the near future Councilwoman Rose

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:13

we're going to lead our legislative

0:15

caucus before we formally call the

0:19

special legislative session to order so

0:22

I'll call it to order following this

0:24

caucus Mr trusdale will lead us in roll

0:28

call the invocation this evening will be

0:30

led by vice president green followed by

0:33

the Pledge of Allegiance which will be

0:35

led by councilman Jones we do not have

0:38

any

0:39

Communications for tonight we will then

0:42

open the floor for Courtesy of the floor

0:45

follow by the approval of minutes for

0:47

the legislative session that occurred on

0:50

April 9th

0:52

2024 then we will have reports of

0:55

committees you will hear the following

0:58

reports uh I will deliver the report on

1:00

behalf of the administration committee

1:03

on the work session that occurred on

1:05

April 16th

1:07

2024 then vice president green will

1:11

share a report on behalf of the budget

1:13

and finance committee on the work

1:15

session of April 16

1:18

2024

1:20

then chair Jones will share a report on

1:24

behalf of the Public Safety Committee on

1:26

the work session of April 16 2024

1:30

chair Ros will share a report on behalf

1:32

of the parks recreation and enrichment

1:34

committee on the work session of April

1:37

16th

1:39

2024 and councilman Rodriguez is absent

1:42

this evening we do not have any

1:45

ordinances for first reading ordinances

1:47

for Amendment or ordinances for final

1:50

passage we will then move to resolutions

1:53

the first resolution for consideration

1:56

is resolution 21 of 2024

2:00

which we will vote

2:01

upon resolution 22 of

2:05

2024 which we will vote

2:10

upon resolution 23 of

2:14

2024 which we will vote

2:18

upon resolution 24 of

2:22

2024 which we will vote

2:28

upon resol resolution 25 of

2:32

2024 we are going to table that

2:35

resolution uh the request was made by

2:39

councilwoman Daniels our community and

2:42

economic development committee chair to

2:45

add this resolution to our May

2:48

14th legislative session

2:51

agenda resolution 26 of

2:54

2024 we will suspend the rules for

2:57

discussion and then we will vote upon

3:00

this

3:02

resolution is there any old

3:07

business okay any new

3:11

business okay and then we will

3:14

adjourn I'm sorry I do have some some

3:17

new business yes sorry I was looking at

3:19

something I would like to just speak

3:20

about some things happening in

3:21

Harrisburg this weekend

3:30

any other new

3:32

business

3:58

okay

4:28

e e

5:06

evening again the time is 6:07 p.m. I

5:11

would like to call our special

5:13

legislative session to

5:17

order Mr trusdale could you please call

5:20

the

5:20

[Music]

5:21

role Miss

5:24

Daniels Miss Davis

5:26

present Miss green present Mr Jones here

5:32

Miss Rose present Mr

5:35

Rodriguez Miss Bowers present please

5:39

note for the meeting record that both

5:42

councilwoman Daniels and councilman

5:44

Rodriguez are excused this evening the

5:48

invocation will be led by vice president

5:51

green thank you president Bowers if we

5:54

could take a moment to keep the family

5:56

of Miss Becky Beamer Hicks in our

5:58

thoughts and prayers as well as all

6:00

those in the city of Harrisburg who has

6:01

lost someone and if we could also pay

6:04

our respects to the Fallen K9 Officer

6:08

Zeke thank

6:11

you thank you councilman Jones The

6:15

Pledge of Allegiance will be led by

6:17

councilman

6:21

Jones to the flag of the United States

6:24

of America to the Republic for it stands

6:28

one nation

6:36

indivisible thank you vice president

6:38

green and councilman Jones we do not

6:41

have any Communications this evening we

6:43

will move to Courtesy of the floor just

6:47

a few housekeeping notes before we begin

6:49

please state your name and your address

6:51

for the meeting record if you don't feel

6:54

comfortable sharing your address please

6:55

share the vicinity in which you live

6:57

within the city you will have four

6:59

minutes to share your comments Mr

7:02

trusdale will serve as our timekeeper I

7:05

will begin to my right is there anyone

7:07

that would like to offer public

7:16

comment good evening Council uh Brian

7:18

keyling Midtown I didn't intend to come

7:22

here tonight but I come in peace and in

7:24

good faith to bring something to your

7:26

attention that mutually impacts the her

7:29

harisburg Palestine Coalition and you

7:32

the Harrisburg city council as a body

7:34

you may or may not be aware that

7:37

yesterday afternoon David Cohen

7:39

president and CEO of the Jewish

7:41

Federation of Greater Harrisburg sent

7:42

out an email in which he addressed a

7:44

wide range of pro Palestine activities

7:47

that are taking place in Harrisburg and

7:50

the surrounding communities setting

7:52

aside the overarching dishonesty and

7:54

racism of his email there are some

7:57

things he said that you should be made

7:58

aware of as they directly affect you and

8:01

the work you do first Mr Cohen's email

8:04

claims that he is quote in active

8:06

conversation with the city and city

8:08

solicitor unquote regarding efforts to

8:11

prevent the Harrisburg Palestine

8:12

Coalition from engaging in legal

8:14

permitted activities in violation of our

8:17

first amendment rights as you are surely

8:20

aware the city is already currently

8:22

being sued by the ACU over first and

8:24

14th Amendment violations on another

8:27

matter if what Mr Cohen suggest is true

8:30

and the city solicitor or other

8:32

officials are engaged in activities that

8:33

will further violate the constitutional

8:35

rights of Harrisburg residents this

8:37

Council should be made aware of that as

8:40

you have a duty to intervene to protect

8:42

the rights of your residents and protect

8:44

our city from opening itself up to

8:46

additional costly lawsuits I don't want

8:49

my hard-earned tax dollars to be wasted

8:51

on lawsuits where my own rights were

8:52

violated I'd rather my rights not be

8:55

violated and my tax dollars go to

8:56

addressing the very real problems our

8:58

city faces

9:00

second Mr Cohen's email contains a

9:02

section that specifically pertains to

9:04

the ceasefire resolution HPC presented

9:07

to this Council and in it Mr Cohen takes

9:10

it upon himself to speak on your behalf

9:12

stating what council does or does not

9:14

support and what council will or will

9:17

not do to my knowledge Mr Cohen is not

9:20

the designated spokesman of the

9:21

Harrisburg city council especially given

9:25

that this Council has never made a

9:26

public statement regarding your

9:27

intentions to bring this resolution

9:29

forward or not Mr Cohen's email is a

9:31

Brazen admission of his own efforts to

9:33

have our resolution killed behind the

9:35

scenes

9:36

undemocratically I don't think I need to

9:38

explain how this looks to members of the

9:40

public the CEO of an organization

9:43

confidently assuring his stakeholders of

9:45

his influence over local politics sends

9:47

an alarming message to our Harrisburg

9:49

Community because to be clear that is

9:52

what he's doing it should never have

9:54

needed to be said but since he lived in

9:57

Boston less than a year ago and is new

9:59

here Mr Cohen may not be aware that the

10:01

Jewish community in Central PA is

10:03

significantly more diverse than just the

10:05

Jewish

10:06

Federation and the proud active Jewish

10:09

contingent of the Harrisburg Palestine

10:10

Coalition rejects any suggestion that he

10:13

speaks for us he is not our community

10:15

leader he is the president and CEO of

10:18

one organization an organization that

10:20

has alienated much of the Jewish

10:22

community over this very issue so he

10:25

doesn't speak for me but he also seems

10:27

to think that he speaks for you and

10:29

without the transparency on a resolution

10:31

that HBC has been asking for we won't

10:33

really be able to know for sure if he

10:35

does we have other Council initiatives

10:38

that would be of value to this city but

10:41

we need to know if we're actually

10:42

working with this Council or if we're

10:44

really going up against the mayor

10:45

solicitor and Mr Cohen operating behind

10:47

the facade of

10:49

council so that's all I'm not going to

10:51

ask you for anything tonight uh or take

10:53

more of your time I know the long night

10:55

you had last night and I don't intend to

10:57

drag this out for you any longer for a

10:59

second night in a row I do want to

11:01

respect your time but I'm here to

11:03

protect HPC because Mr Cohen's actions

11:06

are an escalation that uh directly

11:09

targets us and puts our community safety

11:11

at risk and I'm also here in the

11:14

interest of protecting you because

11:16

however HPC and council's relationship

11:18

May sometimes appear the Harrisburg

11:20

Palestine Coalition cares deeply about

11:22

the city of Harrisburg and our

11:24

Collective Community thank you thank you

11:28

thank you is there anyone else my right

11:30

that would like to offer public

11:33

comment seeing and hearing no one anyone

11:35

in the middle

11:36

section seeing and hearing no one anyone

11:39

to my left seeing and hearing no one

11:43

we'll move forward with the agenda as

11:45

printed next we have approval of minutes

11:48

for the legislative session that

11:50

occurred on April 9th

11:52

2024 council members are there any

11:55

revisions to those meeting minutes

11:59

okay seeing and hearing none the minutes

12:01

stand approved we will now move to

12:03

reports of committee I will deliver the

12:06

first report on behalf of the

12:08

administration committee on the work

12:10

session of April 16th

12:14

2024 on Tuesday April 16th 2024 the

12:19

administration committee met to receive

12:21

one quarterly report and one resolution

12:25

Mr Carl Singleton director of The Office

12:27

of equity and compliance was present to

12:30

share the first quarter report for

12:34

2024 highlights included the following

12:36

the mayor's Equity Roundtable small work

12:39

group is preparing to deliver policy

12:42

language to be considered by mayor

12:44

Williams and Harrisburg city council by

12:47

the end of

12:48

April um Mr Singleton participated in

12:51

the visit Hershey Harrisburg Dei

12:54

listening session 2024 annual goals were

12:58

discussed

13:01

monthly uh data showing new business

13:05

applications from the mertile and tax

13:07

office have been

13:10

shared council members ask questions

13:13

regarding local participation timeline

13:15

for legislation meeting attendance on

13:18

current projects Master format language

13:21

educational opportunities for small and

13:24

minority owned businesses and dbe

13:27

certification clarification

13:30

resolution 21 of 2024 is a resolution

13:34

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

13:36

negotiate and enter into a Professional

13:39

Services agreement with revised software

13:42

systems for the purpose of redesigning

13:45

upgrading and hosting the website for

13:48

the city of Harrisburg Mr Matt mael

13:51

communications director Miss Hillary

13:53

green procurement services and Mr Nathan

13:56

grumbine deputy director of The Bureau

13:59

of Information

14:00

Technology were present on behalf of the

14:03

administration Mr maelle noted that Mr

14:06

Jason Graves uh the alerted

14:08

administrator Business Development

14:11

worked diligently on the work group but

14:14

was unable to participate in the meeting

14:16

Mr mael shared that exploration for a

14:19

website redesign began in August of

14:22

2023 due to slow update speeds and a

14:25

lack of accessibility the focus of the

14:28

website read design is to create a Sleek

14:31

design with mobile accessibility there

14:34

were a total of 32 businesses that

14:36

responded to the RFP 15 moved on to the

14:40

second round seven moved to an interview

14:43

process revised software systems was

14:46

unanimously supported by the group

14:49

council members ask questions clarifying

14:51

revises location technical support

14:55

timeline clarification web design and

14:58

hosting capab abilities security issues

15:01

and breaches current website design and

15:03

cost security redesign approval and

15:06

website efficiency Thomas Jean owner

15:09

rise Software System shared those

15:13

various uh that there are various

15:15

approvals needed for the redesign

15:18

there's a 50% chance um that the

15:21

redesign will be completed by September

15:24

completion of the redesign is more

15:26

likely or more realistic to occur during

15:29

the fourth quarter of the Year Mr

15:32

grumbine shared that the design and

15:34

coding will be handled by Revis security

15:37

standards meet the city's capabilities

15:39

and are of no concern the current

15:42

website was designed by Gavin a lanster

15:45

based company and the cost is unknown

15:48

the last website redesign occurred in

15:52

2018 I encourage my colleagues to

15:54

support resolution 21 of 2024 to improve

15:58

the assess ability and userfriendly

16:00

nature of the city's website for

16:02

residents and members of the public this

16:05

concludes the administration committee

16:08

report next you will hear uh from vice

16:12

president green on behalf of the budget

16:14

and finance committee on the work

16:16

session of April 16th

16:18

2024 vice president

16:21

green thank you president Bowers during

16:23

the work session of April 16th of 2024

16:27

uh the budget and finance committee

16:29

discussed resolution 24 of 2024 which is

16:32

a resolution approving the third

16:33

proposed 2024 budget reallocation in

16:36

order to appropriate certain monies

16:38

locally designated as Revenue

16:39

replacement funding through an award

16:41

under the American Rescue plan act to

16:43

provide for specified projects during

16:46

this discussion um the main focus was

16:48

about the the pools in the city um there

16:51

was a request for $2 million excuse me

16:55

$1,945 th000 to be spent to Wards the

16:59

South Harrisburg pool uh in order to um

17:02

start phase one of the project which uh

17:05

consists of groundwork demo um soil

17:08

testing to see if it was an adequate

17:10

site as well as design development for

17:11

the project uh 55,000 was to be

17:14

allocated towards the Jackson lck pool

17:16

for pool repairs to ensure the pool

17:18

could open up for this year and then um

17:20

there was 6 million that would be air

17:21

marked into a special fund to ensure

17:23

that was available for the South

17:25

Harrisburg pool project uh in the

17:27

discussion council members um

17:29

asked questions about what would be done

17:31

with the the Jackson Lake pool um how it

17:33

we make it available for this year what

17:36

the repairs consisted of um and the

17:38

administration kind of went over it what

17:40

it would include Expansion Joints to

17:42

make for sure that there were no leaks

17:44

in the pool uh reox the bottom of the

17:46

pool repainting some of the gutters uh

17:49

redoing the pool bath houses to ensure

17:51

that they were adequate for our

17:52

residents uh and possibly redoing the

17:54

concession facilities um in the

17:56

discussion I think council members made

17:58

it clear that although we support uh

18:00

Jackson Lake pool opening for this year

18:02

so that our residents could have a pool

18:04

and our kids could have a pool uh inside

18:06

the city they could go to uh we were

18:08

interested in looking for other funding

18:10

sources so that we didn't start pulling

18:12

from money that was allocated towards

18:13

the South Harrisburg pool especially

18:16

given that um the funds that are there

18:18

already might not be adequate enough um

18:21

I did have a discussion with the

18:22

administration um the mayor did come to

18:24

the meeting at the end of the meeting

18:26

yesterday uh and she expressed her

18:29

thoughts on the project itself uh and

18:31

the need for the pool to open up uh I

18:33

did meet with the administration

18:35

including the mayor uh the business

18:37

administrator and um members of parks

18:39

and recreations today uh just trying to

18:41

figure out where we could come up with

18:43

some of the other funds from and I think

18:45

we have come up with a solution in order

18:47

to uh pull funds from the Capo project

18:49

line for a capo project for um road work

18:53

that won't be completed this year

18:54

because some things need to be done with

18:56

pined out beforehand so hopefully that's

18:58

a resol um a concession we can agree to

19:01

together uh in order to pull the 55,000

19:03

from a line item that's not going to be

19:05

utilized this year rather than pulling

19:07

it from arpa funds that we look to air

19:09

mark so that the South Harrisburg pool

19:11

can be completed um that's an amendment

19:13

I will bring forth when it's time for

19:16

resolution 24 of 2024 to be discussed

19:18

and um we'll be able to discuss it more

19:20

during that time and I would ask for my

19:22

council member support thank

19:25

you thank you vice president green the

19:28

next report you will hear will be

19:30

delivered by chair Jones the chair of

19:34

our Public Safety Committee on the work

19:36

session of April 16th

19:39

2024 thank you president Bowers uh so

19:43

first I will start with my um report of

19:46

uh the Harrisburg BAU

19:49

police on on April 16 2024 the Public

19:54

Safety Committee work session was held

19:56

um we discussed the quarterly reports of

19:58

the Harrisburg BAU of police um the

20:01

summary of the session was uh the

20:03

reports goals in the year-to DAT spend

20:05

of the C CSD in the

20:08

upd present to discuss uh was Captain uh

20:13

Thomas McGarity of the technical

20:15

services division commissioner Thomas

20:17

Carter uh Captain Russell Winder Mr

20:20

Angelo Craig and deputy chief young they

20:24

discussed the vice um the vice

20:26

statistics noting that 49 cases were

20:29

assigned seizing 60 um

20:33

60.25 ounces of cocaine

20:36

78.75 ounces of crack cocaine

20:40

21550 in US currency um they also served

20:44

uh 16 search warrants um 13 arrests were

20:48

made also there were 151 juvenile cases

20:52

assigned um the community service

20:55

division responded

20:56

to7 calls and issue eight

21:00

citations also discussed with the csa's

21:03

um they handled 172 calls for service

21:07

all in the first quarter uh they

21:09

attended eight community events uh The

21:12

Bu of police were able to take uh 51

21:16

ghost guns off the street and 41 and 43

21:19

manufactured guns off the street the TSD

21:22

division had the bur had a bur wide

21:26

training on use of forth use of force

21:29

tow vehicles and defense tactics the

21:33

uniform police uh division took in

21:37

18,893 calls for service and recovered

21:42

27

21:44

Firearms uh questions asked by Council

21:47

um I asked for an update on uh sidewalk

21:50

parking enforcement I asked uh of the

21:54

7,765 tickets that were issued on the

21:57

side which were which of them were

22:01

sidewalk parking for sidewalk parking at

22:03

the time there is no way that they can

22:05

break that number down noting that all

22:07

tickets written are violations not just

22:10

sidewalk violations Council also asks

22:12

about the status of the gvi Grant in

22:15

response more resources are being

22:17

gathered more Partners all working

22:19

toward the first initial Callin

22:21

commissioner Carter made Council aware

22:24

that um he plans to have a gun buyback

22:27

initiative with Mr Elby he also stated

22:30

that his officers were able to Ser save

22:33

four lives using

22:35

Narcan and that will end the report for

22:38

the Bureau of

22:40

police I will go on to the buau of

22:43

codes on April 16

22:47

2024 the Public Safety Committee work

22:49

session was held with the Bureau of

22:51

codes on their query reports the summary

22:54

of the session was the reports of their

22:57

goals and their year to date spend in

22:59

the first quarter of

23:00

2024 present to discuss the reports were

23:03

director Anne Montgomery she discussed

23:05

the scope of work for codes also

23:07

reported that there were nine prop non

23:10

properties lifted out of condemnation

23:13

via the progress Progressive expe

23:15

inspections there were 501 permits

23:18

issued 375 public complaints and 284

23:23

violations submitted 330 citations

23:26

issued and 84 hours of Court hearings

23:30

that were logged all in the first

23:32

quarter she also shared that the goal in

23:35

2024 uh was to demo 30 properties and

23:38

six of them were done in the first

23:40

quarter also out of the

23:44

67,5 appropriated uh for their budget in

23:48

the first quarter their year-to dat

23:49

spend is $

23:52

7,223 28 which leads a balance of $

23:56

58,5 26

23:59

72 questions that were asked I asked um

24:02

codes could they assist in the parking

24:05

uh violation happening with the vehicles

24:08

parked completely on the parcels in

24:10

response to uh in response director

24:13

Montgomery responded Yes and that two

24:16

call officers were assigned to North

24:18

17th Street uh where the officers will

24:21

be placed will be placing door hangers

24:24

notifications to remove the cars within

24:26

2 days after that citation will be

24:28

written um and an additional code

24:31

officer will inspect the North 18th

24:33

Street area in Holly Street um it was

24:36

further com um communicated that if Cole

24:39

seeds any cars on the sidewalk they will

24:41

notify police officer Justin

24:44

Wells and um there were no questions

24:48

asked by my

24:49

colleagues I mean there were no further

24:52

questions asked by my colleagues and

24:54

that ends a report of the burough codes

24:57

I we'll move on to the of fire on April

25:00

26 I mean April 16th 2024 the Public

25:03

Safety Committee work session was held

25:06

we discussed the quarterly reports from

25:08

the buau of fire the summary of the

25:10

session was the first quarter reports

25:12

and goals in year to spend year to date

25:14

spin present to discuss was Chief Brian

25:17

Interline Chief Interline shared a

25:19

breakdown of the major incident types

25:21

sharing that there was

25:24

16.41% good intent calls 25

25:29

87% false alarm and false cost

25:33

6.23 uh per of fires and 28.8 6 resulted

25:39

I mean of rescue and emergency calls in

25:42

the month from January there were 301

25:45

incidents 252 in February and 282 in

25:50

March as for the year today spend with a

25:52

budget of

25:55

7,274 7834

25:58

cents uh the year-to DAT

26:01

spend uh is

26:06

1,847

26:07

[Music]

26:09

15238 which would leave a balance of

26:13

5,427

26:16

6315 which equals

26:19

25.4% use of that budget we also spoke

26:22

about the three firefighters that

26:24

retired also informed Council that the

26:27

first quarter that there was one loss of

26:29

Life Council had no questions for chief

26:32

Interline and that concludes my report

26:35

for the Bureau of

26:36

fire now I will conclude with uh Public

26:39

Health Report on April 16th 2024 the

26:43

Public Safety Committee work session was

26:45

held on the quarterly reports of the of

26:48

the health department summary of this

26:50

session the reports were on the goals

26:53

and vacancies and Community engagement

26:56

present to discuss was director NVA

26:58

Wright we discussed the training

27:00

opportunities that are being identified

27:02

for 2024 the health office was invited

27:05

to present at the trans transitional

27:09

research Cancer Center um Consortium in

27:12

March also reported was there was 27

27:16

General inspections five new business

27:18

inspections eight Progressive

27:20

inspections and five public complaint

27:23

inspections and 10 special event

27:26

inspections all in the first quarter

27:29

there is a onep part-time uh inspector

27:32

position open as of April 5th of 2024

27:35

nine applicants applied and five

27:37

interviews are scheduled there's also an

27:40

updated Health license application now

27:42

available in Spanish there were also no

27:45

questions from my Council uh members and

27:48

that also concludes the report of Public

27:54

Health thank you the next report you

27:57

will here will be delivered by chair RS

28:01

on behalf of the parks recreation and

28:04

enrichment committee on the work session

28:07

of April 16th

28:09

2024 chair RS thank you president BS and

28:12

good evening every um body here in

28:14

person and online on April 16th 2024 the

28:19

Parks and Recreation and enrichment

28:21

committee convened to address resolution

28:24

22 of 2024 which is a resolution

28:28

ratifying the submission of a Grant

28:30

application to the Pennsylvania

28:31

Department of Conservation and natural

28:34

resources for the purpose of developing

28:36

a natural Green greencap Park to be

28:39

known as the SWAT Street

28:42

Park Mr Kevin Saunders the Parks and

28:45

Recreation manager shared a

28:47

comprehensive overview of the proposed

28:50

project project Partners sh Alex Rea and

28:54

George Payne elaborated on the park

28:57

green SC

28:58

space initiative planned for swader

29:01

Street in the AL in the South Allison

29:04

Hill

29:07

Neighborhood the partners presented a

29:09

two-phase project covering 10 Parcels

29:12

with phase one dedicated to eight

29:14

Parcels in phase two to the remaining

29:16

two Parcels they showcased visual

29:19

representations comparing the projects

29:22

envisioned outcome to the current state

29:24

of the parcels key benefits highlighted

29:27

included natural stress reducing

29:29

environments children's amenities solar

29:32

lighting security features like a police

29:36

substation and a focus on creating green

29:39

spaces and familyfriendly activities

29:41

driven by Community

29:43

preferences discussions involved post

29:46

completion responsibilities for the city

29:49

residents and project Partners including

29:51

maintenance supported by a dcnr grant

29:55

for 5 years responsibilities such as

29:58

creating at least one Ada accessible

30:01

curb cut and assuming maintenance duties

30:04

after the initial 5-year period were

30:06

allotted to the City community members

30:09

from groups like The South Allison Hill

30:11

homeowners association committee wildart

30:15

Ministry and other residents agreed to

30:17

share upkeep duties on a rotating basis

30:20

Council inquiries revolved around parcel

30:23

coverage the rational behind the

30:26

Project's location change con concerns

30:28

regarding gentrification and the

30:30

preference for aou over a contract

30:34

members of the Allison Hill Community

30:36

came out and strongly advocated for the

30:39

Green Space Project emphasizing its

30:41

positive influence on providing

30:43

recreational op options for harrisburg's

30:46

youth with robust Community backing and

30:49

acknowledgement of the Project's merits

30:52

the recommendation is for council

30:53

members to support resolution 22 of 2024

30:57

to Advance this community's initiative

30:59

in Harrisburg this summarizes the

31:02

proceedings of the park recreation and

31:04

enrichment committee thank

31:06

you thank you um as I mentioned earlier

31:09

chair Rodriguez is absent this evening

31:12

but I'll just provide a brief uh summary

31:16

report uh on the work session on behalf

31:19

of the Public Works committee that

31:21

occurred on April 16th

31:24

2024 on April 16th 2024 the public

31:27

Public Works committee met to consider

31:30

one resolution resolution 23 of

31:34

2024 which is a resolution of the

31:36

Council of the city of Harrisburg

31:38

authorizing and appointing Austin

31:41

Griffin deputy director of Public Works

31:43

as the city of harrisburg's design to

31:46

execute any forms documents contracts

31:50

and reimbursement agreements in the

31:52

Pennsylvania Department of

31:54

transportations electronic engineering

31:57

and construction management system and

31:59

reimbursement Agreement System um Mr

32:02

Griffin was present last night and he

32:05

shared that um due to the

32:10

um absence of Mr Daniel snow our city

32:15

engineer uh this would provide and

32:17

ensure that the Department of Public

32:19

Works had access uh to pend Do's

32:22

electronic engineering and construction

32:24

management system and would be helpful

32:27

um as they peruse um different projects

32:31

to determine the status um so that

32:34

concludes the brief report for the

32:36

public works committee we do not have

32:39

any ordinances first for first reading

32:42

ordinances for Amendment or ordinances

32:45

for final passage we will move to

32:47

resolutions the first resolution for

32:49

consideration is resolution 21 of 2024

32:54

Mr trusdale could you please read it

32:55

into the record resolution 21 2024 a

33:00

resolution authorizing the city of

33:01

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

33:04

Professional Services agreement with

33:05

Revis software systems for the purpose

33:08

of redesigning upgrading and hosting the

33:10

website for the city of

33:12

Harrisburg thank you council members are

33:15

there any questions comments or concerns

33:18

related to resolution 21 of

33:22

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trusdale

33:25

could you please call the vote Miss

33:27

Davis

33:29

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

33:35

roll yes Miss

33:37

Bowers yes resolution 21 2024 passes by

33:42

a vote of 5 to

33:44

Zer thank you next we have resolution 22

33:48

of

33:49

2024 Mr trell could you please read it

33:51

into the

33:54

record resolution 22 2024 resolution

33:58

ratifying the submission of a Grant

34:00

application to the Pennsylvania

34:01

Department of Conservation and natural

34:03

resources for the purpose of developing

34:05

a natural green skate park to be known

34:08

as the satera street park thank you

34:11

council members are there any questions

34:13

comments or concerns related to

34:15

resolution 22 of

34:18

[Music]

34:19

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trale

34:23

could you please call the vote Miss

34:26

Davis no

34:28

Miss

34:30

green

34:32

yes Mr

34:34

Jones

34:36

yay Miss

34:38

Rose

34:40

yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 22 2024

34:46

passes by a vote of 4 to

34:49

one thank you next we have resolution 23

34:54

of

34:55

2024 Mr trusdale could you please please

34:57

read it into the

35:01

record resolution 23 2024 a resolution

35:05

of the Council of the city of Harrisburg

35:07

authorizing and appointing Austin

35:09

Griffin deputy director of Public Works

35:11

has the city of harrisburg's designate

35:13

to execute any forms documents contracts

35:16

and reimbursement agreements in the

35:18

Pennsylvania Department of

35:19

transportations electronic engineering

35:20

and construction management system and

35:23

reimbursement Agreement

35:24

System thank you council members are

35:27

there any questions comments or concerns

35:30

related to resolution 23 of

35:34

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trusdale

35:37

could you please call the vote Miss

35:40

Davis

35:42

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

35:48

rolls yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 23

35:54

2024 passes by vote of 5 to zer thank

35:58

you next we have resolution 24 of

36:02

2024 Mr trale could you please read it

36:06

into the

36:10

record oh that's

36:17

right impeccable timing so this is

36:20

resolution 24 of

36:23

2024 am as amended okay a resolution

36:28

approving the third proposed 2024 budget

36:30

reallocation in order to appropriate

36:33

certain monies locally designated as

36:35

Revenue replacement funding through an

36:37

award under the American Rescue plan act

36:40

to provide for specific projects thank

36:43

you uh at this time I will entertain a

36:45

motion to suspend the rules for

36:48

discussion so move is there a second I

36:50

second that motion thank you I will

36:53

defer to our budget and finance

36:55

committee chair vice president green

36:58

thank you president Powers um I guess um

37:02

I kind of went over in my report that I

37:04

would be making a um a motion to amend

37:07

this resolution uh so that the money for

37:10

the Jackson L prepars would come out of

37:12

a general fund reallocation um coming

37:14

out of a line item for um road project

37:18

that will not be completed this year

37:20

because the project is at a stand still

37:22

until pendot does the pre-work they need

37:24

to do so um I guess it looks look like

37:27

we have the finance team here that maybe

37:29

can go over the numbers a little better

37:31

kind of to to show um where the funds

37:34

are coming from and the back of the

37:35

amended resolution um there is a

37:39

Schedule D that was added or exhibit D

37:41

excuse me that was added that shows

37:43

which line items the funds will be

37:45

coming from and um how it will impact

37:48

things whenever you're ready if you

37:52

could use the microphone please thank

37:54

you thank you madam chair president

37:56

powers I will have um our accounting

37:59

manager go into the uh accounting and

38:02

budgetary details so that uh you know

38:05

we'll be hon do and explained to you

38:07

clearly if you have any questions from

38:09

he and I when he's complete please let

38:11

us know thank

38:15

you uh yes good evening get situated

38:18

here everyone uh hope you're all doing

38:21

well uh thank you president Bowers uh

38:25

president green vice president green

38:29

um I uh the city solicitor distributed

38:33

early the uh amended proposed third

38:36

budget reallocation it's been amended I

38:38

believe for the second time now my the

38:41

main focus there as you've gone over uh

38:44

a good summary ahead of me is exhibit

38:47

D and we became aware of the of a

38:51

lessening of the need to

38:54

fund uh streets and Roads project

38:57

projects in the capital projects fund so

39:00

the move to enhance the general fund and

39:03

to enable it to um address the $555,000

39:06

for Jackson lick is just a simple budget

39:10

uh Amendment adjustment moving from

39:12

transfers out to capital projects and

39:16

funding up the particular account uh P

39:20

pool improvements also in the general

39:22

fund in the Parks Recreation and

39:24

enrichment budget unit

39:28

so that's the $55,000 plus up because

39:31

it's interfund originally it was

39:33

appropriated for transfer to the capital

39:35

projects fund we have to mirror the

39:38

adjustment in the capital projects fund

39:40

by reducing both revenue and expense

39:43

because that $55,000 has determined to

39:46

not be needed in in cap projects so

39:49

that's why you're seeing the

39:50

corresponding uh two additional lines

39:52

for the capital projects

39:54

fund and again that's exhibit the

39:57

and it's footnoted footnoted a with the

40:00

uh brief

40:02

description thank you very much are

40:04

there any questions regarding this I'll

40:07

start my far left with councilman Jones

40:10

sorry thank you uh vice president green

40:13

just only one question you you said that

40:15

these funds aren't needed anymore um and

40:18

if they are uh what's going to replace

40:21

this

40:22

55 um it at the present time it's been

40:25

determined that there's just a lessening

40:27

of uh a particular streets and RADS

40:30

project uh there are several U but it's

40:33

been determined that the the the outlays

40:36

for 2024 won't be at the level that was

40:40

represents the original

40:42

appropriation okay but if if you

40:45

indicate if the possibility does develop

40:47

later in the year that there's uh a turn

40:51

of events or a need we can accordingly

40:53

come back and and readdress that okay no

40:56

further

40:58

questions thank you uh councilwoman R

41:01

any questions uh I don't have any

41:03

questions I just want to First just say

41:05

you know thank you for um vice president

41:09

green for um looking into this

41:12

diligently today and asking them to do

41:15

so but also thank you Miss Kelly and

41:17

Brian for looking into this and I'm

41:19

trying to find a way to work this out so

41:21

that we didn't set a precedent that we

41:24

are taking money from um projects such

41:27

as as um the pool that would be going

41:29

out the sou or um any other projects

41:31

that we know are are very necessary but

41:34

actually trying to find it coming out of

41:36

other Appropriations that as you said we

41:39

don't um need have a need for at the

41:41

moment and don't see one in the near

41:44

future so I just want to thank you both

41:46

for working on that

41:48

today yes well three of you everybody I

41:51

want say you both I was but but um all

41:53

three of you working together I know

41:55

last night was a little SP spicy at the

41:57

end but I think it proved to show that

42:01

we can we we can um act as adults and um

42:06

figure things out um even when um at

42:10

first there's there a b turmoil so just

42:12

um thank you for all of us coming

42:14

together and doing that y thank you no

42:16

you're welcome yeah and it it was a

42:18

collective effort with the team

42:20

including uh budget manager input from

42:23

the mayor and also the uh business

42:25

administrator well I hope they're watch

42:26

I say than you to all of them as well so

42:28

I always worry about the numbers but I I

42:31

appreciate Neil's office being able to

42:33

handle the intricate legislation

42:35

adjustments that go along with something

42:37

like this so it was big big team effort

42:40

it was well thank you team anybody miss

42:43

I'm so sorry but yes thank you everybody

42:45

and I'm sorry for not recognizing the

42:47

mayor and Mr Brooks I to do that earlier

42:50

sorry oh that's so oh it was your idea

42:53

okay it was his thank you councilman

42:56

Jones

42:58

that's it for me thank you president

43:00

Bowers thank you um I don't have any

43:04

questions as long as we're confident

43:06

that uh the funds won't be needed for

43:09

our streets and Roads um and if that's

43:11

clear I'm fine with moving forward um

43:14

thank you for the collaboration uh and

43:18

communication uh I think that um both

43:21

are very much needed particularly in

43:24

instances like this one um and I'm glad

43:27

glad that we were able to come to some

43:29

level of a compromise so thank you thank

43:32

you thank you councilwoman Davis thank

43:35

you vice president

43:37

green I just like to say that I'm glad

43:41

that everything has worked out um it is

43:45

good to see our teams work together and

43:48

come to a positive solution for our

43:52

residents

43:53

so thank you that's it thank you very

43:58

much um I want to say thank you to all

43:59

of my council members um just for having

44:01

the conversation last night and um

44:03

ensuring that we did do our job and we

44:05

were diligent with uh looking over

44:07

everything uh and keeping our priorities

44:09

first um thank you to the mayor and the

44:11

administration for being willing to have

44:13

the conversation today um so that we

44:15

could come to this point and work

44:16

together um I will say I am confident in

44:19

our finances at this point um and there

44:23

were several other places we could have

44:24

pulled the money from we chose this

44:26

because we're confident we won't be

44:28

needing this money this year for this

44:29

project uh but there were other places

44:31

we could have pulled it from we could

44:32

have patched it together so um I do feel

44:35

confident that if the need would arise

44:37

to do a road project uh we would be able

44:40

to to come up with the money so thank

44:42

you very much for everybody um and I

44:44

think that's all that I have when it

44:46

comes time for the actual amendments I

44:49

will need help from our solicitor

44:51

though all

44:54

right okay so

44:58

so any further comments questions on

45:02

resolution 24 of

45:05

2024 before we return to our legislative

45:09

session okay seeing and hearing none

45:11

I'll entertain a motion to return to the

45:14

legislative session so moved is there a

45:16

second second thank you so before us we

45:19

have resolution 24 of

45:23

2024 Mr trusel could you please read it

45:25

into the record one more time

45:30

resolution 24 2024 a resolution

45:32

approving the third proposed 2024 budget

45:36

replacement or reallocation in order to

45:38

appropriate certain monies locally

45:39

designated as residue replacement

45:41

funding through an award under the

45:43

American Rescue plan act to provide for

45:45

specified projects as amended as amended

45:48

as amended thank you thank you uh

45:51

council members I'll defer to vice

45:54

president green for her amendment I

45:57

would like to propose an amendment with

45:58

the assistance of the solicitor because

46:01

this is not an ordinance but a

46:02

resolution it's just very simply the

46:04

count a motion to adopt the

46:08

uh third budget reallocation as amended

46:12

as of April the 17th

46:15

2024 okay I would like to make a

46:17

resolution to adopt the resolution 2024

46:21

of 2024 as amended as of April 17 2024

46:28

is there a second I second that thank

46:31

you council members any questions

46:33

comments or concerns related to the

46:36

amendment seeing and hearing none Mr

46:39

trale could you please call the

46:42

vote Miss

46:45

Davis

46:47

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

46:54

Rose yes Miss Bowers

46:58

yes the amendment passes by a vote of 5

47:01

to

47:01

[Music]

47:03

zero

47:06

okay so we're good to go we don't have

47:08

to have another vote because it's a

47:09

resolution as amended thank you um

47:12

resolution 25 of

47:14

2024 as we noted during our caucus has

47:18

been tabled and will be included on our

47:20

May 14th legislative session agenda our

47:24

final resolution this even is resolution

47:28

26 of

47:29

2024 Mr trale could you please read it

47:32

into the record resolution 26 2024 a

47:36

resolution authorizing the city of

47:37

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

47:40

Professional Services agreement with

47:42

Alexander boding construction company to

47:44

serve as the construction manager for

47:46

the reservation Rehabilitation and

47:48

reconstruction of the Broad Street

47:49

Markets red brick

47:52

building thank you council members I

47:54

will entertain a motion to suspend the

47:56

rules for for discussion soon moved is

47:58

there a second second thank you I will

48:02

defer to our parks recreation and

48:05

enrichment committee chair to lead the

48:07

discussion chair

48:09

Ros thank you very much

48:13

um so is there anybody here from the

48:16

administration to talk about resolution

48:18

26 of

48:20

2024 and if so please join us up here at

48:22

the front

48:29

we'll be right with you we're grabbing a

48:30

computer real quick

48:39

for yeah they get a computer

48:59

this

49:12

[Music]

49:49

to be up with

49:55

this what you got Pres

50:50

um please excuse our brief submission

50:52

right now we're just trying to get a few

50:54

things um up and running with the

50:56

computer Compu so give us a moment if

50:58

you are joining us online and uh we'll

51:01

get started shortly thank you for your

51:03

patience

51:55

m for

52:37

I USB the HDMI

52:46

[Music]

53:06

do it

53:20

under good experience thank you yeah

53:28

okay all right uh let me know when you

53:31

guys are ready I we're ready when you

53:33

are okay all right good evening city

53:36

council um I'd like to I'd like everyone

53:39

to introduce himself to the table here

53:40

real quick and then we can start the

53:41

slideshow if we can start from my right

53:44

and then work our way over to the left

53:46

um please go ahead and introduce

53:48

yourself good evening nice to see you

53:50

guys again I'm Terrell Davis with

53:52

Alexander building construction project

53:55

manager good evening everyone Steve Wilt

53:58

project executive with Alexander

54:00

building

54:01

construction good evening Debbie reart

54:03

project manager with the Department of

54:06

facilities and special

54:08

projects all right good evening Senate

54:10

council my name is David Baker I'm the

54:12

facilities director for the city of

54:13

Harrisburg uh tonight we'd like to bring

54:15

to you uh what what I foresee as one of

54:18

uh many approvals um for the Broad

54:21

Street Market brick building uh this is

54:24

a um basically a break down of our uh

54:28

scoring process for the uh Broad Street

54:31

Market construction manager portion of

54:33

this project um in front of you you see

54:37

a uh breakdown of the scoring uh for the

54:40

construction manager uh portion of the

54:42

project um as you can see at the bottom

54:45

the totals on the scoring you see the

54:47

individuals uh Daniel Hartman our City's

54:50

business administrator was one of the

54:51

individuals Scott Miller who is a

54:53

project manager for the facilities

54:55

Department who has um 25 years of

54:57

experience in the field and Deborah

54:59

reart who has over 25 years of

55:01

experience in project management um in

55:03

this field as well um in the two

55:06

paragraphs below you can see some of the

55:09

some of the many key features uh that

55:11

kind of separated the um Alexander group

55:15

as far as the construction management

55:16

firm goes um and uh I think some of the

55:20

ones that I noticed were uh their um you

55:24

know their deep understanding and um you

55:28

know years of work in the fire

55:29

restoration field and also doing period

55:32

specific rebuilds uh before you some of

55:35

the pictures of a few of the different

55:37

projects that they've completed and on

55:39

that note I'm going to hand this one

55:41

over to Alexander to kind of give you a

55:43

synopsis on what it is that they're

55:45

going to be bringing to the table for

55:47

the city and what their role is in the

55:49

project um or in the um construction

55:52

manager uh role that they'll be playing

55:56

thank

55:57

you again I'd like to start off by

55:59

telling you a little bit about Alexander

56:01

Alexander lives works and plays in the

56:04

city we've been in business since 1928

56:07

over on vaugh Street same location and

56:10

have done a lot of the work in the city

56:11

over the

56:12

years we're a construction management

56:15

firm we do a lot of interaction with

56:17

different um communities within the uh

56:21

Harrisburg Area um and we looking

56:23

forward to bringing our fire uh water

56:26

wind and Restoration company to the

56:29

table to assist in this uh historical

56:32

and and unique

56:34

building it's been a long time coming to

56:38

actually do some work uh on this

56:40

building I remember as a young child my

56:42

grandmother would take me here to to buy

56:45

her products and everything uh and it

56:48

has been just a just a beautiful

56:50

beautiful building back in the day and

56:52

we want to take it back to that Glory we

56:55

will be uh bringing in a superintendent

56:57

the superintendent will be uh working as

57:00

a eyes and ears of of you an extension

57:04

of your services since we work directly

57:06

for you and give advice and direction to

57:09

the prime contractors that are brought

57:11

on board we will direct them through the

57:14

coordination and communication with the

57:19

city we are looking forward to um

57:22

engaging the community we know there's a

57:25

lot of uh PR around this project and we

57:28

are looking forward to making sure

57:30

people are understanding what's going on

57:33

um the way that you want it distributed

57:35

and sent out to the

57:38

community um as far as the uh the job

57:42

that we're going to be doing we will

57:43

assist with the hiring of the architect

57:49

and the and the um Engineers we'll make

57:52

sure that uh it's vetted properly

57:54

working through hand in hand with the uh

57:57

buildings and grounds folks and making

58:00

sure that we uh are able to lay out the

58:04

best team for the project taking a look

58:06

at our staff uh when we looked at this

58:08

project we were adamant about putting on

58:11

the right team to this project it's a

58:13

unique job so we made sure that we have

58:15

our restoration advisors we have a

58:18

project manager that has has done this

58:20

type of work before and other team

58:22

members that are really dedicated to

58:25

filling the team team out properly in

58:27

order for us to make sure that we can

58:29

perform the best for you on this

58:32

project quality control is a key issue

58:35

for us uh we're going to make sure that

58:38

it's a quality job that everybody can be

58:40

proud of we'll make sure that when we're

58:42

bringing on contractors they're local to

58:44

the community we Engage The the wbe MBE

58:48

and disadvantaged

58:50

businesses we have a large database and

58:54

we've worked in concert with many

58:56

uh folks in the area that will really

58:58

help us work towards a common

59:02

goal and I think that's pretty much

59:06

where I'm at with the the overall

59:08

construction there's many other elements

59:09

in our proposal but one thing I would

59:11

would highlight and I don't know that um

59:14

it's been talked about much but there's

59:17

Insurance monies that are dealt with

59:19

this project our our fire restoration

59:22

folks they deal with insurance carriers

59:25

all the time and and there are other

59:28

processes that they're familiar with

59:30

with the estimating software with the

59:33

with the understanding what U unforeseen

59:36

items can be actually going back to the

59:39

insurance company so it's not a cost to

59:41

the city so we're going to take every

59:43

step we can to make sure that you're

59:46

getting as much as you possibly can for

59:49

our

59:51

services right on that note uh do any

59:54

members of council have any questions

59:56

for us oh thank you um I'm sure we've um

1:00:00

a few of us do have some questions I

1:00:02

know the Broad Street Market is a um a

1:00:04

huge undertaking and a loss to the city

1:00:07

right now so we are definitely looking

1:00:09

forward to it being rebuilt um not just

1:00:12

back to um what it was but even better

1:00:17

um I think um we're definitely looking

1:00:19

forward to that so I thank you all for

1:00:21

coming out tonight and speaking to the

1:00:23

to us about this about the project

1:00:26

um thank you also for um uh director

1:00:30

Baker for putting up how the scoring

1:00:31

system went who was on the team I know

1:00:34

that is something I'm always looking for

1:00:36

uh with the bed process and so are the

1:00:38

residents to see how um construction

1:00:41

companies are being picked um I did have

1:00:43

a few questions for you and then also

1:00:45

for Alexandra and Co and then I will um

1:00:48

pass it to my council members um my

1:00:50

first question um for you uh director

1:00:52

Baker was um I had noticed that when the

1:00:55

bid process went out one of the

1:00:57

qualifications was you were looking for

1:01:00

the lowest bid now I didn't see up there

1:01:02

what the bids were but then I did notice

1:01:05

that um when the bids were finished

1:01:07

Alexander and Cole were the highest bid

1:01:09

so I was just wondering um even though

1:01:12

your you were your qualifications were

1:01:14

the lowest bid why did you all decide

1:01:17

and was there a score my first question

1:01:19

was would be were was there a score for

1:01:23

um the the money bid was there a scoring

1:01:27

process for that and if so uh what did

1:01:30

each bidder get for that score and uh

1:01:34

when did you change your qualifications

1:01:36

for um wanting the lowest

1:01:40

bid all right so um to that question

1:01:43

with this process this RFP process we

1:01:45

the city doesn't actually have to go

1:01:47

with the lowest bid the lowest cost for

1:01:49

the bid we try and go with the most

1:01:51

responsible bidder to get the most U

1:01:53

bank for our buck as far as what cont

1:01:55

contractors we go with what Consultants

1:01:57

that we go with um and and in this

1:02:00

process you know after the scoring was

1:02:02

all said and done uh that was what the

1:02:04

individuals doing the scoring felt is

1:02:06

that with this uh particular firm that

1:02:09

we would get the most benefit out of out

1:02:11

of these individuals for the money that

1:02:13

we'd be paying um and Alexander was not

1:02:16

the highest uh I think they were second

1:02:18

the highest no they were the highest

1:02:21

they were second I thought they were the

1:02:24

highest oh so so that's confusing there

1:02:27

were actually two Alexanders um that

1:02:29

were being scored so okay I'm sorry my

1:02:31

eyes could have went really quick you

1:02:32

know once I saw the 984 th000 I could

1:02:35

have wandered a little bit right so that

1:02:38

yeah hope hopefully that answers the

1:02:41

does that um well yes and partial I know

1:02:44

but

1:02:46

um I think my confusion comes with if

1:02:49

and I would be confused if I was put in

1:02:51

a bid if the qualification says we're

1:02:53

looking for the lowest bid but then that

1:02:56

kind of comes off the table when you end

1:02:58

up picking a company you didn't really

1:02:59

pick the company that did that had the

1:03:01

lowest bid because maybe as you're going

1:03:03

through figures you're trying to get it

1:03:04

as low as possible but then you actually

1:03:08

aren't looking for that when everything

1:03:10

is said and done so I think

1:03:12

that as we're putting out bids making

1:03:15

sure we stick to what we asked for and

1:03:18

our scoring process reflects that

1:03:21

because that wasn't part of a score was

1:03:23

it like you know how much the bid came

1:03:25

in

1:03:28

as that was I didn't see the fee was

1:03:31

part of it okay that was that's my

1:03:33

question I didn't can you go back to

1:03:35

that

1:03:36

slide and Madam chair to be a lawyer for

1:03:38

a second please do um a request for

1:03:42

proposal is different than a bid okay

1:03:45

okay and so request for proposal is a

1:03:48

proposal which has many factors into

1:03:51

qualification numbers what the plan is

1:03:54

there's um and it's just it's not the

1:03:56

same rules you're talking about the

1:03:58

submission of The Proposal no the whole

1:04:00

thing there is it starts it starts as a

1:04:02

as a request for proposed RFP whereas a

1:04:05

bid has a different legal structure to

1:04:06

it right okay even a bid is not required

1:04:09

in Pennsylvania to be the lowest bid

1:04:10

it's the lowest responsible bid based on

1:04:13

the bid package put out you know and so

1:04:16

and so you look at the you look if you

1:04:18

say and we'll take it out of this thing

1:04:20

like let's say you're you're you're

1:04:21

doing a road work and part of it is um

1:04:24

we we are uh we are a new road company

1:04:27

we've never done any road work or we

1:04:28

don't have a bond that has to come with

1:04:30

it I mean there's a lot of little things

1:04:31

that come in it and I didn't do this one

1:04:32

I'm just I'm but there is a lot of

1:04:34

nuance when you're doing these and

1:04:36

there's some of them are check boxes

1:04:37

right you got to have this like remember

1:04:39

the incinerator there was no bond you

1:04:40

got to have you got to have your

1:04:41

performance bond you got to have your

1:04:43

payment Bond different things come into

1:04:46

these but there's also other in most of

1:04:49

these you have a list of things you have

1:04:51

to have in terms of conditions and some

1:04:53

of them are the qualifications of of the

1:04:56

different Professionals in it some of

1:04:57

them are um the uh sticking with the

1:05:01

categories that were there some are

1:05:03

having experience doing certain things I

1:05:05

mean but so everyone is sort of unique

1:05:07

to our project and that's just not

1:05:08

Harrisburg you take the project and you

1:05:11

and and they try to write up something

1:05:12

that covers the actual project that's

1:05:13

trying to get done but they are

1:05:15

different and so that there that's and

1:05:17

so they to drill into what you really

1:05:19

drill into the whole RFP packet like not

1:05:22

just the one piece it's a it's a pretty

1:05:24

thick packet that that went out the door

1:05:27

yeah I I do understand what you're

1:05:28

saying I just want to make sure we're

1:05:30

clearing what we ask um companies or

1:05:34

what we're saying the qualifications are

1:05:36

because that is how they I would would

1:05:38

think create their proposal round this

1:05:41

is what they're looking

1:05:43

for that's all I'm saying just I just

1:05:45

want to say be clear and and be concise

1:05:48

and then keep that same requirement as

1:05:50

you go through the process cuz that

1:05:53

would only be fair that's that's my only

1:05:55

point in that that um if I'm not

1:05:56

clearing what I'm saying please let me

1:05:58

know but I just wanted to make I was

1:05:59

just saying it felt like we switched it

1:06:01

up once the bids came in or the rfps

1:06:04

came in as I if we switched it I'm

1:06:07

unaware of that

1:06:09

okay

1:06:12

um it just it just seemed that way to me

1:06:15

like I thought it was saying you know

1:06:17

we're kind of looking for the the lowest

1:06:20

bid but or the lowest RFP but that's not

1:06:25

really what it

1:06:27

was that's what well if it was a bid

1:06:30

would still it's still responsible bid

1:06:32

it's not lowest we we we have

1:06:35

responsible to do the project as

1:06:37

proposed like you know there is some

1:06:39

knowledge when you put the bid package

1:06:41

together it's going to require this much

1:06:43

time this many people and if if if a

1:06:46

number doesn't hit that number we've had

1:06:48

that for example with lawn cutting like

1:06:49

where someone comes in and their bid

1:06:51

couldn't cover the gallon of gas for

1:06:53

each lawn they were cutting you know so

1:06:54

how are you going to do this you know um

1:06:57

but it's it's a it's initially comes up

1:06:58

a lot in procurement okay all right

1:07:02

thank you um also I

1:07:06

um I think my other thing my other

1:07:09

question was going towards a wbe

1:07:11

participation I know that I think on

1:07:13

your application you said you don't

1:07:15

participate

1:07:17

and we always participate okay always we

1:07:22

actually have a mentor prot program very

1:07:25

active active um on all our jobs not you

1:07:28

know a requirement or you know a set a

1:07:31

set amount we don't we don't go by that

1:07:33

we go by going out to all our our

1:07:37

contractors and and just saturating the

1:07:41

market I that's what we do so

1:07:46

um we have a lot of we have a lot of

1:07:48

people in our database um that it's just

1:07:52

a good it's a good process that we've

1:07:54

always had and we we will get you know a

1:07:58

lot of participation we always do

1:08:01

it Tyrell didn't seem too impressed with

1:08:04

that answer no he was like no I'm going

1:08:08

to move on I have other questions but

1:08:10

I'm goingon to let my council members go

1:08:11

I don't like to be greedy um uh so I

1:08:14

want them to ask some questions too so

1:08:16

I'm going to start on my uh farle with

1:08:18

councilman uh

1:08:20

Jones thank you uh councilwoman Ross

1:08:26

how how are you guys today my question

1:08:28

is going to start out with you Mr Baker

1:08:31

so these numbers up here what do they

1:08:35

mean so we have uh multiple categories

1:08:39

that everything is graded off of there's

1:08:41

there's a a slew of different categories

1:08:43

the whole packet that the the grading

1:08:45

team will go through so um each

1:08:49

different category they'll go across and

1:08:52

they'll grade from that specific

1:08:54

category for every single r RP that they

1:08:56

read so let's say you get a 30 page RFP

1:08:57

they read every page of the RFP they go

1:09:00

through on these you know every single

1:09:02

line on the scoring sheet and then they

1:09:04

score each individual RFP on every

1:09:07

single line and then all those lines

1:09:09

they add up you they get in a room

1:09:10

together they all go over their

1:09:12

different um scoring numbers and then

1:09:15

these are the end results for all the

1:09:17

scoring that's done for every single RFP

1:09:19

that comes in and they read and go

1:09:22

over okay so this is like the the end

1:09:24

result the tabulation after all the math

1:09:27

problems have been done and this is the

1:09:29

end result for that that tabulation okay

1:09:32

what do they

1:09:33

mean um so each category and I mean we

1:09:38

could I don't know just give me an

1:09:40

example because I'm just all I'm seeing

1:09:41

is like numbers I'm just seeing numbers

1:09:44

I don't know what these numbers mean

1:09:46

some numbers are high some numbers are

1:09:47

low I don't know what they mean right um

1:09:50

so what we did is we set up a scoring

1:09:52

Matrix and

1:09:55

there several categories that we score

1:09:57

on I can't hear you ma'am yes sorry um

1:10:01

several categories that we score on so

1:10:03

for example the first one is plan

1:10:05

purpose objectives and challenges so

1:10:08

what what we're looking for is the

1:10:10

proposal the contractor's proposal of

1:10:12

how well they understand what we're

1:10:14

looking for that's one we score on that

1:10:17

um another criteria is the team

1:10:20

qualifications and experience do they

1:10:22

have the correct experience right people

1:10:24

assigned to the team

1:10:25

um and we read proposals on that um we

1:10:29

also had a criteria this particular one

1:10:31

because we wanted to make sure that the

1:10:34

uh construction manager had his staff or

1:10:37

their staff excuse me on site every day

1:10:40

to make sure that things are going way

1:10:42

they should be so we scored on that if

1:10:44

they if they address that in the

1:10:46

proposal then they got a certain amount

1:10:48

of points yeah I would you know uh again

1:10:50

Mr Baker what I would love to do for me

1:10:53

to to let me have a butter

1:10:55

understanding how you're selecting these

1:10:57

individuals and no disrespect to your

1:10:59

company you guys seem to been around for

1:11:01

a very long time but this is like for me

1:11:03

is my second time seeing you guys in

1:11:05

front of me and is that based on is that

1:11:07

is those any of these numbers represent

1:11:10

the level of their experience or how

1:11:11

many years they've been in business does

1:11:13

any of these numbers up here represent

1:11:16

that yes we one of the criteria is it a

1:11:19

main factor let me ask it that way so

1:11:21

every single one of these factors are

1:11:23

weighted in in their own regard and one

1:11:25

of the factors is how much uh experience

1:11:28

they have in this specific type of

1:11:30

restoration project and that that that's

1:11:33

a big determination on on who we move

1:11:36

forward with so that is one of the the

1:11:38

grading criteria that we look for is the

1:11:41

this exact type of restoration work and

1:11:43

how much experience they have and the

1:11:45

ability they have to do what we need

1:11:47

them to do in our specific case okay so

1:11:50

I'm going say

1:11:52

this I'm going to look at Jem right

1:11:57

right is that 22 points

1:12:02

off and the bid was maybe $400,000

1:12:06

cheaper why weren't they

1:12:09

selected so we always just gone by the

1:12:12

point system on here as far as and I

1:12:15

shouldn't just say that it's the point

1:12:17

system is a huge Factor but also you

1:12:19

expect to see a certain amount of money

1:12:21

for the services rendered and if the

1:12:24

number is completely out of the park

1:12:27

either above or below what you're

1:12:28

expecting to see what industry standards

1:12:30

are that is a factor that you take into

1:12:33

account whenever you're doing the

1:12:34

grading as well so you're saying that

1:12:36

there's a concern if it doesn't meet the

1:12:37

threshold that you think that the amount

1:12:39

of money that it would take for to get

1:12:40

this project done what about the the

1:12:42

level of experience because if we're

1:12:44

just now what I'm asking for is is

1:12:46

specifically the numbers I said they're

1:12:48

400,000 short than what their bid

1:12:51

was right right okay so if you're

1:12:55

looking at that that number that lower

1:12:59

number doesn't have anything to do with

1:13:01

their experience maybe they may have

1:13:02

know how to do this work that they SC so

1:13:04

let me just say this this is what I

1:13:06

would like to see before I vote on this

1:13:08

I would like to see the rfps that were

1:13:10

out there and then I want to sit with

1:13:12

you and show me how you grade this

1:13:14

that's that's what I would like to see

1:13:16

we can do that all right no further

1:13:19

questions thank you councilman Jones um

1:13:22

president Bowers do you have any

1:13:24

questions I did thank you m um my first

1:13:28

question is I wanted to know how the

1:13:31

team was assembled that review the rfps

1:13:35

that were received uh so we try and keep

1:13:38

an odd number of individuals on the

1:13:41

grading sheet so we don't have any sort

1:13:42

of you know ties or anything and in this

1:13:45

case we took individuals that all had

1:13:47

institutional knowledge in the area that

1:13:49

we'd be grading in

1:14:00

it

1:14:01

seems this has been a recurring question

1:14:04

with Mr Singleton the director of equity

1:14:06

and compliance his involvement in uh

1:14:10

Broad Street Market meetings generally

1:14:14

um but it seems like in this instance um

1:14:18

he should have been

1:14:21

included in some iteration of the odd

1:14:24

number

1:14:26

of individuals assembled for this

1:14:28

[Music]

1:14:29

team

1:14:32

um was a pre-proposal meeting held yes

1:14:38

can you please speak into the microphone

1:14:40

yes when was it held um I don't remember

1:14:44

the day it's generally about three weeks

1:14:47

after the

1:14:57

well do you know how many people or how

1:14:59

many companies were

1:15:02

present

1:15:03

four it's a required walkth

1:15:13

through I would like more clarification

1:15:16

on the scoring rubric and what's

1:15:19

included I think that you you you

1:15:23

mentioned maybe three areas is but I I

1:15:25

didn't hear

1:15:27

seven and what is the scale for the

1:15:33

rubric two 100 points

1:15:38

total you us to read each

1:15:42

individual I would like to know or see

1:15:45

it or something because I can also okay

1:15:49

thank you read that yes okay um plan

1:15:54

Purp goals objectives and challenges the

1:15:57

first criteria that was allotted 10

1:16:00

points team qualifications or experience

1:16:03

was allotted 15

1:16:06

points uh firm will indicates

1:16:09

willingness to have staff on site daily

1:16:11

was allotted Five

1:16:14

Points firm prior experience with

1:16:16

restoration of historical structures was

1:16:19

lotted 10

1:16:22

points the proposed construction manager

1:16:24

back background education Knowledge and

1:16:27

Skills was a lotted 10

1:16:31

points project schedule um just ensuring

1:16:35

that it's detailed and comprehensive and

1:16:37

reasonable that's 15

1:16:41

points project budget was allotted 10

1:16:46

points the fee was allotted 20

1:16:50

points say fee that much the Fe that

1:16:54

they were would be charging

1:16:58

okay and the quality of The Proposal

1:17:01

response was

1:17:05

fiveth seems like a few people

1:17:09

drops so

1:17:12

only go ahead go ahead I I was still

1:17:14

writing go ahead all right I think the

1:17:16

only way that we can actually see how

1:17:18

this I mean I can hear all of those

1:17:20

things now we have to see the well again

1:17:23

I would love to see the rfps and then

1:17:26

compare them if council members want to

1:17:28

sit down and walk through all of them I

1:17:30

mean I don't think I'm not how many of

1:17:33

them were submitted no yeah I want to no

1:17:36

I think I talked with the mayor's office

1:17:38

they have no issue of setting up a time

1:17:39

and taking people and walking through

1:17:41

the whole thing absolutely and so and I

1:17:43

and I think that's a fair way to people

1:17:45

to look at it it's it is a detail

1:17:47

oriented thing it's a lot of data a lot

1:17:49

of information um and you can see the

1:17:52

whole flow of it like I mean I'm

1:17:54

familiar what rfps look like but I'm

1:17:56

saying understanding this scaling and

1:17:58

this grading system I mean for Council

1:18:00

when when you bring these projects or

1:18:02

these uh um yeah projects to to to

1:18:06

council all we see is this we don't

1:18:08

really get to see right so so we're

1:18:10

really concerned about this goes back to

1:18:12

where I started earlier the difference

1:18:14

when there's bids you don't ever you

1:18:16

never see the bid because the bid abut

1:18:18

because the bid is picked by by the way

1:18:20

the law works so rfps come back to you

1:18:22

because there's this other component to

1:18:24

them right but I would suggest if

1:18:26

council members want to do that the most

1:18:28

efficient may have like two people at a

1:18:30

time if you want to do it because you CU

1:18:33

scheduling everybody one at a time will

1:18:34

take a lot of hours however we got to do

1:18:36

it now we want to see it but that well I

1:18:38

talked to the mayor today I talked to Mr

1:18:39

Hartman and that was with the what I got

1:18:41

coming out of that meeting

1:18:44

okay thank you did anybody determine

1:18:47

when the pre-proposal meeting was held

1:18:49

March the 12th thank you

1:18:56

I don't have any other questions just a

1:18:58

comment I just I'm not sure how

1:19:00

Equitable this process was so I don't

1:19:03

know if us

1:19:05

reviewing the rfps at this point if

1:19:08

there's a process issue um I don't have

1:19:11

any further comments thank you thank you

1:19:13

president bar would agree with

1:19:16

that what you just said

1:19:18

so um vice president green do you have

1:19:22

any

1:19:23

questions uh I I think kind of some of

1:19:25

the comments that I I would have had

1:19:26

were already stated so it's no need for

1:19:29

me to go into it further thank you MH

1:19:32

and um councilwoman Davis do you have

1:19:34

any questions thank you councilwoman

1:19:38

Ross I think I'll uh re I'll reserve my

1:19:43

questions until after we get a chance to

1:19:46

review the project um so thank you

1:19:50

you're welcome um yes if we could

1:19:55

set up some time to uh review the

1:19:58

project I know this is what council is

1:20:00

asking for I believe they might have

1:20:02

asked for a few things to be emailed um

1:20:05

if I forgot what that may be does

1:20:07

anybody want to reiterate so I don't

1:20:09

miss it I thought somebody well you

1:20:11

wanted the I think president bers you

1:20:13

were but you read um Miss Reinhardt read

1:20:15

off the rubric did you want that emailed

1:20:17

yes I would like to see okay thank you I

1:20:20

think my just small reservation I first

1:20:23

of all Alexander and Co I think that

1:20:26

you're a great company I know you're

1:20:27

going to be doing the senator

1:20:29

Stadium um so it's not that we feel like

1:20:33

you do not do uh quality work I think

1:20:37

some reservations are that um and you

1:20:40

may not know of this but uh when the

1:20:42

federal building went up when the new

1:20:44

courthouse went up uh residents had

1:20:48

some concerns feelings and

1:20:51

concerns because we weren't a part of it

1:20:55

um no con no rfps or bids however we

1:20:59

want to say the words that went out

1:21:02

included anybody in our community um no

1:21:07

disadvantage business businesses were

1:21:10

included we were left out but it's in

1:21:12

our

1:21:14

community so we can't allow that to

1:21:19

happen again we saw how it felt we saw

1:21:21

the aftermath so what we want to make

1:21:24

sure is that the Broad Street Market

1:21:27

that we've all went to grew up

1:21:31

with we have a seat at the table and

1:21:34

that any company that comes

1:21:36

in and whoever is going to restore that

1:21:39

and preserve it does it with us hand in

1:21:44

hand so I think that's where our

1:21:47

reservation comes from and um it it just

1:21:50

kind of was you know you you already

1:21:52

have the senator Stadium now the Broad

1:21:55

Street Market so you know how does that

1:21:56

work that's two really large projects

1:21:58

where we're not a part of so uh yeah if

1:22:01

we could just get some information I

1:22:03

will not be putting this on the

1:22:04

legislative agenda for the next meeting

1:22:07

uh although I I know we want the Broad

1:22:10

Street Market done we're ready for it to

1:22:12

up and go but I I think that we have to

1:22:15

make sure we're doing this the right way

1:22:17

um I have one last question though um

1:22:20

and nil you may be able to answer answer

1:22:22

this in a legal way when uh or you made

1:22:25

to Mr Baker the team that is

1:22:29

formed uh to go over the the scorings or

1:22:33

go over the interviews and do the

1:22:34

scoring system is it allowed to be um

1:22:39

anyone do they have to be a city

1:22:41

employee and I asked that because the

1:22:45

vendors who were affected in that in the

1:22:47

brown the The Brownstone of the BR

1:22:49

Street Market the brick building would

1:22:52

they be allowed to be on the team since

1:22:55

CU I know you said Mr Baker you put

1:22:57

people on a team who have direct

1:22:59

knowledge of whatever the project is

1:23:02

which they would have direct knowledge

1:23:04

they were affected they know what they

1:23:05

need they know what kind of company

1:23:08

they're looking for is that would that

1:23:10

be allowed so every one of these is

1:23:13

unique but there's not a Prohibition to

1:23:15

have non- city employees on there you

1:23:17

have to as the responsible person with

1:23:19

having Insurance have our people there

1:23:21

they have to be part of it um but at the

1:23:24

end of the today those appointments are

1:23:25

simply an executive function it's up to

1:23:27

a mayor in in this form of government to

1:23:30

to assign people to take care of these

1:23:32

things whether they she ask them or

1:23:34

requests them it's much easier to assign

1:23:36

someone who works for you than assign

1:23:38

someone who

1:23:39

doesn't pragmatic piece that's all right

1:23:42

right but if you but also if you're

1:23:44

trying to make I'm you know and this

1:23:46

isn't towards you or anyone really

1:23:48

directly but just to say I just wanted

1:23:50

to see you know if you're able to have

1:23:53

non City absolutely have on some things

1:23:56

so it just it just depended on the

1:23:58

project I can't you know I think you

1:24:00

know there's a lot on the plate right

1:24:01

now that's large and and I think that's

1:24:03

part of why when it's large you just go

1:24:05

with what who's here right right so okay

1:24:09

thank you I hope moving forward we can

1:24:11

change up our the teams that uh do do

1:24:15

the scoring system I think they've been

1:24:17

the same for the past couple of projects

1:24:20

and I think also making sure uh we're

1:24:23

we're placing people on there that it

1:24:25

also directly affects I have a question

1:24:28

though what was the process prior to

1:24:31

this scoring

1:24:33

system when you how did you select the

1:24:36

people that that bid or this scoring

1:24:39

system was always in place the very

1:24:42

similar scoring system has been around

1:24:44

for years I mean there's a little

1:24:45

variation whether it's a road project or

1:24:47

something else but for harisburg I mean

1:24:49

you you're seeing back toback two of the

1:24:50

largest projects we've had in a dozen

1:24:53

years right they're just aren't a lot of

1:24:55

giant multi-million dollar projects here

1:24:57

um which one are you referring to the

1:24:58

stadium and the Broad Street Market I

1:25:00

mean there just aren't multi there

1:25:01

aren't big projects like that coming

1:25:03

through well I'm I'm speaking to I'm

1:25:06

following up with the sentiments that

1:25:08

Council woman RW had $396 million

1:25:11

project in the heart of Harrisburg

1:25:13

Pennsylvania not one local vendor not

1:25:16

even a gopher got a job

1:25:19

here 300 yeah $396 million project not

1:25:24

one person and we had to March around

1:25:27

this building still didn't get a job so

1:25:30

the concern is like you know again no

1:25:33

disrespect to your company when you keep

1:25:35

seeing the same people getting these

1:25:37

projects I got to start thinking about

1:25:39

why are they the only ones getting

1:25:42

them and our job is to stand in Vanguard

1:25:45

for this community and sure is something

1:25:48

that I completely ran on to make sure

1:25:50

that uh local vendors and businesses are

1:25:53

included in economic growth of the city

1:25:55

of Harrisburg so that's that's just my

1:25:58

concern of just seeing this process how

1:26:00

it actually works so that we know that

1:26:03

there really

1:26:05

isn't I would just call it

1:26:07

favoritism all right I'm going to speak

1:26:09

now speak up I I think listen to what

1:26:13

you guys are concerned I Shar the

1:26:16

sentiment

1:26:17

100% okay um being as a minority myself

1:26:22

in the construction industry majority

1:26:24

time that's not another person that

1:26:25

looks like me all right I've been in

1:26:26

Industry going on for 10 years all right

1:26:29

and only I've only met one other black

1:26:31

project manager and that was in the city

1:26:32

of Philadelphia and that's working here

1:26:35

in the state of PA so I understand your

1:26:37

sentiment um but what I would ask add to

1:26:40

that is that you guys are 100% right

1:26:43

that's a process and that's a procedure

1:26:45

that is incorrect and a lot of it comes

1:26:47

down to educational um what you guys are

1:26:50

asking or expecting is for people to

1:26:53

have the opportunity to say at the table

1:26:55

but there many of us lack the education

1:26:57

I'm going to say us because I'm one of

1:26:58

those individuals there as the person

1:27:01

who has owned a business who has worked

1:27:03

in the construction industry here I

1:27:04

don't necessarily have the opportunity

1:27:06

to bid on the project this large give me

1:27:08

a road home oh I can do it give me a fit

1:27:10

out a million dollars sure I could do it

1:27:13

but we're talking about something that

1:27:14

is you know8 10 15 20 I don't know what

1:27:17

the dollar value of this project would

1:27:18

be but that requires a different level

1:27:20

of education and experience that a lot

1:27:22

of us just don't have and so

1:27:25

while we want this to happen I think we

1:27:26

got to go back okay how can we start

1:27:28

educating the community far few in

1:27:31

advance so when opportunities like this

1:27:32

show up here like this is something just

1:27:34

like a year two three years in the works

1:27:36

it takes time to do um I'm right through

1:27:39

with you guys I I I understand I

1:27:42

understand it and it hurts to even hear

1:27:44

a $250 million project so

1:27:46

396 I don't care if it's over a million

1:27:49

dollars like the fact that no one had

1:27:50

the opportunity to sit at the table and

1:27:52

there's plenty of contractors here like

1:27:55

I feel that I feel that um that

1:27:59

particular job was was awarded to a firm

1:28:03

in Pittsburgh Pittsburgh and they

1:28:04

brought their own team and they B their

1:28:06

own team and we were just as frustrated

1:28:09

about that because literally we could

1:28:11

have walked to that site from our office

1:28:13

and we had a plan that was all

1:28:16

inclusive and again we didn't get a

1:28:20

crack at it and it upset us but

1:28:25

and and I and and so if you if you can

1:28:27

feel that sentiment right how do you

1:28:29

think some of these

1:28:31

other uh companies would feel too that

1:28:34

they didn't really get a opportunity and

1:28:37

and and again you guys were just before

1:28:39

us think I would say I would say that

1:28:42

they got an opportunity we all had to go

1:28:44

to the pre bid we all had the same

1:28:46

requirements in the RFP which I so

1:28:48

that's why I want to learn the system so

1:28:50

so we I need to learn that we got the

1:28:52

RFP

1:28:54

I brought I brought it all tonight we we

1:28:55

brought an the RFP that was sent there

1:28:58

were certain guidelines that had to go

1:28:59

by the RFP to make sure you were

1:29:02

responsive bidder we put together a so

1:29:04

you you were a part of the grading no no

1:29:07

no I was part of of of providing a

1:29:09

proposal and we put together a proposal

1:29:13

did you see the other proposals no so

1:29:16

this has really be the first time they'd

1:29:18

be available to someone outside that's

1:29:20

how that works like you know so so say

1:29:23

to me I I hear you Neil but what he's

1:29:25

saying to me is that this is you feel as

1:29:28

though that you were the best qualified

1:29:29

pretty much is what you're saying right

1:29:31

I I think we offered more than other how

1:29:33

if you haven't seen the other ones

1:29:34

because I know I know a lot of these

1:29:35

firms are I know Jonathan B that doesn't

1:29:38

mean anything so so you brought Jonathan

1:29:41

bers he's in the building right now this

1:29:43

man has just been awarded three times in

1:29:46

one year for the work he's done he's

1:29:48

done plenty of work in the city of

1:29:50

Harrisburg

1:29:51

absolutely so the 185 no no no I I know

1:29:55

Jonathan bers I you asked me how I I

1:29:57

know Jonathan bers he doesn't have a

1:29:59

restor a fire restoration group and and

1:30:02

and doesn't do a lot of that type of

1:30:03

historical work same with so you can't I

1:30:05

see has he can sub can

1:30:09

he I'm just saying I have two questions

1:30:13

I wanted to know

1:30:15

um how do we Define most responsible

1:30:19

bidder Mr Baker that's what you referred

1:30:22

to this company as the most responsible

1:30:26

bidder and that we would get the most

1:30:28

bang for our buck is there a definition

1:30:31

for most responsible

1:30:34

bidder I would say the definition I

1:30:36

would use would be a bidder that meets

1:30:38

the qualifications that we're looking

1:30:40

for in the certain criteria that we're

1:30:42

asking so whenever we put that RFP out

1:30:44

and we say we're looking for all these

1:30:46

different criteria we want to see you

1:30:48

know X Y and Z we we look for specific

1:30:50

items and then when we get those

1:30:52

proposals back that's how we grade off

1:30:54

of the proposals and that's how we

1:30:56

decide who the most responsible bidder

1:30:58

is Miss rard I see you shaking your head

1:31:00

are you confirming that there is a

1:31:02

actual definition for most responsible

1:31:05

bidder or you're just affirming what Mr

1:31:08

Baker is saying that his hypothetical

1:31:11

definition I I just to CL that would be

1:31:13

my definition I know it's your

1:31:15

definition that's why I'm asking if no

1:31:17

not Webster's Dictionary something in

1:31:20

the rubric something in what is Define

1:31:23

what is

1:31:24

how is a the most responsible bitter

1:31:28

defined so I don't know if there's a

1:31:30

very specific legal definition but the

1:31:32

way that we defined it for this team the

1:31:35

scoring team was how well the proposals

1:31:38

met the criteria that were listed in the

1:31:44

RFP okay and then I had a comment for Mr

1:31:47

Davis

1:31:49

um I found some of your commentary a

1:31:52

little offensive let's not assume that

1:31:54

everyone lacks education in this

1:31:57

instance it's a lack of opportunity it's

1:32:00

not the education so I just wanted to

1:32:02

clarify that thank

1:32:06

you does any other council members have

1:32:08

any other questions my mic's not on any

1:32:11

questions or

1:32:14

concerns okay well does does anybody

1:32:17

else have anything else to say from the

1:32:18

administration or Alexander and

1:32:21

Cole thank you for the opportunity to

1:32:24

yeah you're welcome thank you for coming

1:32:26

thank you all for coming that concludes

1:32:28

the business of the Parks and Recreation

1:32:30

enrichment committee thank you um I will

1:32:34

entertain a motion to resume the

1:32:36

legislative

1:32:38

session motion moved is there a second

1:32:41

thank you so we returned to the session

1:32:44

uh before us we had resolution 26 of

1:32:47

2024 but I believe chair Ross noted she

1:32:50

would like the resolution to remain in

1:32:52

committee at this time

1:32:55

um I you know I did but you

1:33:00

know what's the process if it remains in

1:33:02

committee it just comes back to another

1:33:04

work session you can bring it out

1:33:07

anytime so some things remain in

1:33:09

committee a year and a half depending on

1:33:10

the complexity right all right I I would

1:33:12

do that because I feel like my my uh

1:33:14

council members need some time to look

1:33:16

at some documents and then I'll converse

1:33:18

with them and have it brought back in

1:33:21

and if and Tiffany from my office

1:33:22

participated in the legal side of these

1:33:24

okay so if you need her available to

1:33:27

walk people through things she can do

1:33:29

that okay you too right okay all right

1:33:33

thank you I assigned her this contract

1:33:36

I'm bouncing off but she's in the weeds

1:33:38

okay right that has to more more to do

1:33:41

with language

1:33:43

right on the documents I our office is

1:33:46

working on the language of the document

1:33:48

right that's what we're trying to get to

1:33:49

I got you

1:33:51

yep thank you is there any old Business

1:33:54

Council Members yes thank you president

1:33:58

Bowers I'd like to make a motion to

1:34:02

revisit resolution

1:34:05

22224 it's it's reconsidered reconsider

1:34:09

uh resolution 22

1:34:12

d224 is there a

1:34:14

second

1:34:17

second the motion on the floor is to

1:34:20

reconsider resolution 22 of 202 four um

1:34:25

council members is there any

1:34:28

discussion yes oh no I don't have okay I

1:34:32

just misread the resolution and want to

1:34:37

yes re vote cash your vote over please

1:34:41

okay so we have resolution 22 of 2024 Mr

1:34:45

trale could you read it just to refresh

1:34:47

everybody's

1:34:49

memory resolution 22 2024 a resolution

1:34:53

ratifying the submission of a Grant

1:34:55

application to the Pennsylvania

1:34:57

Department of Conservation and natural

1:34:58

resources for the purpose of developing

1:35:00

a natural greencape park to be known as

1:35:03

the Tera Street Park thank you assuming

1:35:07

there's no further questions comments or

1:35:09

concerns Mr chel can you please call the

1:35:11

vote on the motion to reconsider which

1:35:13

is not motion to

1:35:18

reconsider yeah on the motion to

1:35:19

reconsider

1:35:22

yes oh okay

1:35:25

Miss

1:35:26

Davis

1:35:28

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

1:35:34

rolls yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 22

1:35:39

2024 passes by a vote of no the motion

1:35:42

to reconsider has passed oh the motion

1:35:45

to reconsider is passed now we can call

1:35:49

it for a formal vote got resolution 22

1:35:53

of 20 24 Mr chel can you please call the

1:35:56

vote Miss Davis yes Miss green yes Mr

1:36:01

Jones yay Miss Rose yes Miss Bowers yes

1:36:06

resolution 22 2024 passes by vote of 5

1:36:08

to zero thank you thank you any new

1:36:12

business council members yes Sor I

1:36:16

was typing away yes very quickly I would

1:36:20

like to go over um some things happen in

1:36:22

Harrisburg this weekend

1:36:25

or Thursday to Sunday and on um so

1:36:30

what's happening in harrisburger family

1:36:31

singles and couples Earth Day Festival

1:36:34

Saturday April the 20th from 12:00 p.m.

1:36:38

to 2:00 p.m. at Reservoir Park

1:36:40

Brownstone there will be info tables

1:36:42

educational sessions beekeepers and

1:36:45

crafts so please come out and join us on

1:36:47

Saturday April the 20th also don't

1:36:50

forget that um The Parks and Recreation

1:36:52

is still holding watercolor painting

1:36:54

class and that ends April 25th and that

1:36:57

is at the reservoir park Brownstone from

1:37:00

Wednesday um on Wednesdays from 11:00

1:37:02

a.m. to 20 to 12:00 p.m. so please don't

1:37:05

miss

1:37:06

out also extreme hip hop Thursdays is

1:37:10

still happening it started April 11th

1:37:12

and it ends May 9th and it will be at

1:37:14

the Reser Park pavilion from 6:00 to 7

1:37:17

p.m. so please don't miss out on all the

1:37:19

great activities that are happening

1:37:21

right now in the city if you would like

1:37:22

more information you can visit

1:37:25

harrisburg.pa doov um for the Flyers and

1:37:29

for any more information that you may

1:37:31

need thank you thank you any other new

1:37:34

business okay seeing and hearing none

1:37:36

the time is 7:39 p.m. I will entertain a

1:37:40

motion to adjourn motion to adjourn is

1:37:43

there a second second thank you we stand

1:37:45

adjourn

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.