Doctor Explains GLP 1 Blindness Risk (Should You Be Worried?)
If you're taking a GLP-1 medication, or
you're thinking about starting one of
these puppies, you probably have heard,
how could you not, something about
blindness. I mean, that's a freaking
big, massive deal. You don't just ignore
that. Oh, I'm not going to worry about
blindness, blah blah blah blah blah. No,
it's going to jolt and impinge on you.
The sad reality of what you're seeing
out there is far from the real data. And
so, that's what I want to break down in
this video is sift the truth from the
BS. And more importantly, I'm going to
teach you how to minimize the real risk,
in addition to just giving you the
actual understanding of what the real
risk is. Because there's a lot of
misinformation out there, and I want to
help clear the air. I'm Dr. Jones, D.C.,
and I've lost 100 lbs myself. I've
coached thousands of patients through
this therapy. Now, I'm not an
ophthalmologist, and I don't write your
prescriptions. But my job though is to
translate what your eye doctor and your
prescribers aren't explaining to each
other or to you, probably, for that
matter. And over the next couple
minutes, I'm going to separate real risk
from the fear-mongering stuff that's
happening. And boy, oh boy, is there a
lot of fear-mongering. So, you'll
understand whether you're one of the
actual people who needs to worry, or one
of the people who can just breathe and
continue using your GLP-1s and do your
thing. Okay, so before we talk numbers
though, you have to understand what
you're actually afraid of. Because most
of what people are calling GLP-1
blindness online isn't what's in the
data. So, the condition being studied is
called NAION, or non-arteritic ischemic
optic neuropathy. Basically, it's a
stroke of the nerve that feeds your
eyeball. The optic nerve is the cable
that connects your brain to your eyes.
Thousands of tiny little fibers bundled
together running through a narrow tunnel
in your skull. In some people, that
tunnel is a little smaller than average.
The cable is a little more crowded. Eye
doctors call this the disc at risk
anatomy. And it's something that you
were born with, or you aren't. And
here's why this matters, because when
blood flow to that nerve gets briefly
compromised, and various factors can
contribute to that, the nerve, it
swells. And in a crowded tunnel, there's
nowhere for it to swell, which can
create a compartment-like effect that
ultimately damages the nerve. And much
of the vision in that eye is often
permanently lost. That's what
non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy
is. And I want to be really clear about
what it's not, because a lot of you
watching have been noticing some kind of
vision change on these medications, and
you're assuming the worst. Blurry vision
that comes and goes on GLP-1s is often
blood sugar fluctuation affecting the
lens of your eye, and it typically
resolves as glucose stabilizes. Dry,
irritated eyes from being more
dehydrated than usual. That's
dehydration. Distance vision getting
slightly worse over months. That's aging
or something called refractive change.
None of these things are NAION. This
condition is sudden, and it often
happens overnight. People wake up with
it in one eye, one sector of the visual
field, often with lasting loss. It is a
specific mechanical event in a specific
anatomy that most people aren't carrying
the setup for. And here's the part that
comes back later. Your eye doctor can
look at the back of your eye and tell
you if you have a disc-at-risk setup.
Which camp you're in is going to matter
for everything that's coming next. And
by the way, if you're sitting here
realizing that you don't really know if
you should be approaching your GLP-1
medications after learning all this
stuff, we offer a free discovery call
with our patient educators, where they
can help you think through your total
situation, what your journey is like,
and more importantly, what it's like to
work with me or my coaches so that we
can help structure a safe program, and
more importantly, one that gets you
results long-term. You can text the
number on the screen or check out the
link in the description if you want to
explore that. But first, let's go over
the numbers, because the numbers are
where the real picture comes together.
So, in the general population, estimates
range from about 1 to 10,000 to 1 in
50,000 adults per year. Now, that rate
climbs with age, and that's the
baseline. In adults on a GLP-1, one
major database study put that number
somewhere closer to 1 in 2,700 adults.
Of course, estimates are going to vary
across studies. Now, I think it's
important to talk about the fact that
partial blindness is such a debilitating
issue that if it happens to you or any
other loved one, there's an immediate
frame where the stats and the
probability of it actually happening
completely are just out of sight and all
of a sudden you're stuck on the fact
that this is going to happen everybody
else. But that's why I'm doing this
video because while it is awful and I'm
going to teach you guys how to minimize
your risk, I think it's important to
take a step back and realize that the
stats are the stats and that's the real
risk. And we're going to cover those two
as well so that you guys understand what
the real risk is versus what you might
think it is and where emotion might
impact that. It's also important to know
that this risk isn't evenly distributed
across time. So, early reports suggest
that NAION cases cluster in the window
when patients hit and sustain maximum
doses. For most patients on standard
titration schedules, that lands
somewhere in the first couple years on
the therapy. So, if you've been on a
GLP-1 for three, four, five years,
you're well past the window where most
of the documented cases appeared. You
are not accumulating risk the way that
the headlines make it sound like you
are. And not every GLP-1 shows the same
signal. Semaglutide, for example, is
where most of the current signal sits.
That's Ozempic and Wegovy. The data on
other GLP-1s is still emerging. Then
there's tirzepatide, Mounjaro and
Zepbound. It doesn't show the same
signal yet, though it's only been on the
market for a couple years. So, it's too
early to say definitively. And with
semaglutide, there's one pattern that
stands out. Early reports suggest
Wegovy, the higher dose weight loss
version, shows a stronger signal than
the lower dose version, Ozempic. The
exact magnitude, though, is still being
sorted out. Now, that's a dose story and
we're going to come back to that in a
minute because that's crucial and that's
how I'm going to teach you how to
minimize your risk. Now, we have to talk
about the other side of the ledger here.
What these medications are actually
preventing because that's the number
that you have to weigh this against.
Okay, so let's start with comparing the
risks and what you're going to lose if
you stop the medication, right? Because
there's a benefit to being on these
medications that I'm arguing is
significantly more than this. I want us
to get into this. One
in 2,700 cases, which is the worst of of
what we said, but I'm going to go ahead
and give that to you. But then, this is
crucial because we know heart attack
risk decreases, stroke risk decreases,
deaths, mortality, flat out, they're
prevented. So, let me map this out. On
one side of the ledger, we have a risk
of one in 2,700 shot of getting this
condition. The other side, what these
medications are actually preventing, and
this column is bigger for a reason. The
SELECT trials looked at semaglutide in
adults with obesity and cardiovascular
risk. A 20% reduction in heart attacks,
strokes, and cardiovascular death. A
broader meta-analysis in people with
obesity without diabetes found roughly a
20% reduction in major cardiovascular
events. So, you're not comparing drug
risk to zero risk. You're comparing a
small, clustered, anatomy-dependent risk
of this condition, and AION, against a
well-documented reduction in the things
that actually kill most adults. And the
condition that these drugs are treating,
insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes,
obesity, is itself the leading cause of
blindness. That untreated disease has
its own eye problems. That's what
actually changes if you stop. The ledger
leans hard in the other direction. Now,
by the way, real quick, if that reframe
just landed, do me a solid and hit that
subscribe button because we put out two
GLP-1 videos every single week with the
same calibrated approach. No
fear-mongering, no cheerleading, just
the actual math on what works and what's
worth your attention, and be sure to hit
that bell. Okay, so what actually falls
into that one in 2,700? So, number one,
we have the disc at risk anatomy, the
crowded tunnel setup that we talked
about earlier. Your eye doctor can check
for this. Number two, existing eye
conditions, glaucoma, prior optic nerve
injury, anything that's already stressed
that nerve may add vulnerability. Number
three, age over 50 with high blood
pressure, diabetes, or sleep apnea.
Those conditions all affect small blood
vessel flow, including the blood flow to
your optic nerve. Number four, the
window when you hit and sustain maximum
dose. Remember that's almost always in
the first one to two years. Number five,
and this is where things get
interesting. The dose that you're on and
how fast you got there. The on-label
GLP-1 titration schedule is designed to
escalate patients to maximum dose in
about four to five months, though many
clinicians adjust that in practice,
which means under the standard protocol,
the peak exposure lands early and it
stays there. That's when the NAION
signal is the hottest. The protocol
itself is part of the risk profile. It's
the dose escalation trap, automatic
titration that pushes you up the dose
ladder without asking whether you
actually need to keep climbing. So,
here's the part that matters most. You
don't need maximum dose to lose weight.
And in our clinic, the patients who I
coach through GLP-1 therapy, they rarely
go above 0.75 to 1 mg of semaglutide,
5/7.5 mg of tirzepatide, or maybe four
or five of Rybelsus. Not because those
high doses are inherently bad. There are
people that need them, because most of
our patients are already hitting their
goals on lower doses because we're
implementing strategic lifestyle
interventions. You see, there's a window
where the medication is doing its job.
And above that window, you're paying the
exposure cost without much more benefit.
That's the therapeutic window and the
sweet spot in action. Across the
thousands of patients we've coached on
this lowest effective dose approach,
tracked over years with baseline exams
and symptom monitoring, we haven't seen
a single case. Now, that's
observational. The NAION condition
itself is rare enough that a single
clinic's zero case record isn't proof of
protection, but it's certainly
consistent with what the exposure math
would actually predict. Okay, the simple
version here. The standard protocol is
the risk profile. The lowest effective
dose is the mitigation. Quick minute, I
want to tell you guys about the Flow
Academy membership. Essentially, this is
my private community on Mighty Networks.
You'll have access to a community coach,
live coaching calls that I do, which are
unsolicited. I don't have to market like
my free lives. I'm just there to help
you guys out as much as possible and a
ton of free resources as well to guide
you through the various protocols that I
talk about in these videos. So, all you
got to do if you're interested in
joining that is just become a member to
this YouTube page and then there's a
link that you can access after you
become a member that will allow you to
join the community. Now, back to the
video. Now, if you want a full video on
exactly how we run the lowest effective
dose protocol, the dosing math, how we
time titration, why most patients never
escalate to the max, let me know in the
comments if that would be helpful to
you. Okay, so what do you actually do
with all of this? First up, know the red
flag symptoms. Sudden vision change in
one eye is the one to pay attention to.
A section of your visual field going
blank or gray. Some patients describe it
as seeing the outline of a shape like a
cupcake shape instead of the whole
image. Colors looking washed out in one
eye but not the other. These are not
wait-and-see symptoms. These are call
your eye doctor today symptoms. Evaluate
as soon as possible, ideally the same
day. Number two, three questions to ask
your eye doctor. Number one, can you do
a baseline dilated exam and document
whether you have a disc at risk anatomy
situation? That tells you which camp
you're in. Number two, if I develop any
symptoms, can you do an OCT, an optical
coherence tomography of my optic nerve?
That's the key imaging tool if something
changes, usually combined with a dilated
exam and visual field testing. And then
number three, given my condition and my
other conditions and what you see on my
exam, what's your honest read at my
risk? Now, many of you have told me that
your eye doctor was more worried than
your prescriber or the other way around.
You deserve a real answer from someone
who's looked at your actual eye. And
speaking of that disconnect, if you've
had that experience, let me know in the
comments when your eye doctor is more
worried than your prescriber or the
other way around because other people
reading this will know that they're not
alone in this. And now the hardest move,
the one a lot of you are considering
that I'd actually push back on. Don't
stop the medication cold turkey. I know
that sounds counterintuitive after
everything that we've just covered.
Think about the ledger here for a
second. Okay, so this is important.
And I've already mentioned it, but
we have weight regain
plus the metabolic
rebound.
Stopping suddenly can cost you the
cardiovascular protection. And that
benefit depends on staying on the
treatment. It sets up metabolic rebound.
Your appetite that comes roaring back.
And many patients regain a substantial
amount of the weight over the following
year. And I know a lot of you are
thinking right now, okay, if I shouldn't
stop cold turkey, then how do I
eventually taper off safely? That's a
whole separate video. If you want me to
make that video, let me know in the
comments and I'll film the whole
protocol, the dose step downs, the
timing, how to avoid weight regain, the
whole thing. Okay, so if you are going
to stop or switch, do it with your
prescriber and your eye doctor working
together, not as a solo decision after a
little Tik Tok video. Even the
Neuro-Ophthalmology Society that studies
this condition has put out a statement,
do not discontinue GLP-1s based on NAION
fear alone. The first 6 to 12 months on
a GLP-1 is also the foundation window. A
powerful stretch when your appetite and
eating patterns can reset and new habits
have a chance to lock in. And when your
relationship with food can reorganize.
It overlaps the window where NAION cases
cluster. Stopping inside it doesn't just
expose you to cardiovascular rebound, it
wastes the biggest opportunity that
these medications give you. Okay, so
this is what you're starting to
hopefully think with.
Max dose
equals higher
risk. Now, we can just ignore that cuz
we don't do the highest risk here, but
what we do do
lower
dose
lower risk.
And I would argue almost non-
existent. So, we also have the weight
regain
plus
the metabolic
rebound. Okay, so the move isn't
stopping. The move is navigating with
the right dose, the right monitoring,
and the right team. Now, before we wrap
up, where do you actually land on all
this? Because if everything that I just
covered made you realize that what you
actually need is that team, not a script
and ship prescriber, not a Google search
at 2:00 a.m., we offer free discovery
calls with our patient educators.
They're going to hear you out on your
history, what you've tried, and what's
on your mind going forward. You'll get a
feel for working with me, the coaches,
and our medical team. Then they're going
to walk through programs and pricing so
that you can picture what a supervised
year actually looks like. You can text
them on the screen or check out the link
in the description if you want to book
that. Another important thing that many
GLP-1 users get wrong is how to maximize
their results simply by injecting. So,
check out that video right there where I
break down what the research says of how
to actually approach injecting in a way
to maximize results. It's a super easy
lever to pull on, so take advantage of
that. We'll see you later.
More transcripts
Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Peanut's Worst Nightmare | Escape From Tarkov
TheBurntPeanut · English

MIKROSKOP : SEJARAH, JENIS, BAGIAN DAN FUNGSINYA
DAVID DORKAS OFFICIAL · English

FUNDAY News 英語新聞 2023.08.09 | PayPal Launches Dollar-backed StablecoinPayPal發行美元支撐的穩定幣
FUNDAY英語學院 - 專業線上英文教學 · English

Beginilah Letusan Dahsyat Gunung Krakatau 1883
Ruang Tengah · Indonesian

I Used Claude and Copilot on the Same Excel Model—HUGE Difference
Mike’s AI For Finance · English

40萬訂閱真心話大冒險 Part 2
Terry Chen 泰瑞 · English

FUNDAY News 英語新聞 2025.08.08 | Chinese Nationals Charged with Exporting Nvidia AI Chips to China
FUNDAY看新聞學英文 · English

Inilah asal-usul Lempeng Tektonik, dan iniah alasan Indonesia sering terjadi Gempa Bumi?
INVOICE INDONESIA · Indonesian

السر اللي هيخلي دهون السنين تذوب في دقائق! 💥✨من غير مجهود ولا دعك كتير#تنظيف_الدهون #خلطات_تنظيف
الست ليزا · English

Pembagian Waktu di Indonesia
posmetop · Indonesian

Ozempic and Wegovy Side Effects Linked To BLINDNESS?
Dr. EyeGuy · English

PENGERTIAN DASAR SENI RUPA| SENI BUDAYA
BU APRIL · English
Get the TLDR of any YouTube video
Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.