Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Work Session - 01/21/2025

1:39:56771 summary words · ~4 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

Harrisburg City Council debated a controversial HUD Emergency Solutions Grant reallocation to avoid losing unspent 2021 funds by a looming federal deadline, and reviewed an $18 million, 48-unit affordable senior housing development proposed for the vacant Woodward School site. The session closed with raw public comment from a resident calling for administrative accountability after losing three sons to local gun violence.

This work session exposes critical friction points between municipal administrative delays and federal grant compliance, while highlighting how community-driven development is trying to address affordable senior housing shortages.

Section summaries

0:00-2:30

Call to Order & Sign Language Interpreter Agreement

watch

President Bowers calls the session to order and holds roll call. The council discusses Resolution 3 of 2025, a professional services agreement with Halcyon Interpreting Services for sign language translation.

Provides the formal opening statistics on municipal accessibility spending.

2:30-15:00

2023 Municipal Audit & 2022 Fee Addendum Discussion

watch

Accounting Manager Brian McCutchen and Boyer & Ritter lead auditor Matthew Wilderson explain the 2023 audit fees and a $28,000 addendum for the 2022 audit. McCutchen blames the extra work on difficulties transitioning to the Munus ERP system and managing key vacancies in the finance director position.

Crucial for understanding the city's financial delays, auditing costs, and internal software transitions.

15:00-30:00

Reallocation of Unspent 2021 HUD ESG Funds

watch

The council reviews Resolution 1-2025 to reallocate $55,529 in Emergency Solutions Grant funds left over from 2021. Business Administrator Sam Sakoski explains that the funds will go to CCU, Shalom House, YWCA, and retroactively clear 2019 administrative costs, avoiding returning the funds to HUD.

Details how the city manages and reallocates older federal housing grant dollars to bypass strict deadlines.

30:00-47:30

Council Debate on HUD Compliance & Missing Department Heads

watch

Council members voice deep frustration that these unallocated funds were only 'just discovered' right before the March 2025 expiration deadline. They criticize the absence of the Interim Housing Director and question whether current non-profit partners are actually providing shelter beds to freezing families.

Highlights the intense conflict between council oversight and administrative management of homeless programs.

47:30-1:07:30

Woodward School Site Senior Housing Plan Presentation

watch

Planning Director Jeffrey Knight presents Resolution 81-2024 to consolidate parcels and build a 4-story, 48-unit affordable senior housing building. Dr. Amber Burelli of the Latino Connection Foundation reviews community engagement efforts, detailing how the design was modified to address neighbor concerns regarding retail traffic and zoning adjustments.

Shows how community planning input directly shaped the design and zoning approval of the senior housing project.

1:07:30-1:27:30

Economic Impact, Local Hiring & Sycamore Homes Status

optional

Dr. Burelli explains the $18 million project budget, emphasizing efforts to work with local trades and Harrisburg-based contractors. She details the status of their other local project, Sycamore Homes, which faced significant funding and elevator installation delays but is scheduled to open in late February or early March 2025.

Provides valuable economic development details, local procurement plans, and project timelines for regional development tracking.

1:27:30-1:37:30

Public Comment: A Mother's Plea for Justice and Support

watch

Harrisburg resident Cheryl Hughes delivers a heartbreaking testimony during public comment. She reveals she has lost three sons to street violence in the city, holding up graduation regalia and claiming the mayor broke relocation and safety promises made to her family.

Provides a raw and vital perspective on community violence, administrative accountability, and the real-world impact of city policies.

Key points

  • New ERP Transition and Finance Vacancies Caused Audit Delays — The transition to the Munus ERP software, tracking mismatched mainframe codes, and critical 2024 leadership vacancies delayed the 2022 municipal audit, triggering a $28,000 contract addendum. Accounting Manager Brian McCutchen noted that these administrative delays required his office to absorb extra duties, which in turn delayed the audit schedule with Boyer & Ritter LLC.
  • Redevelopment of the Vacant Woodward School Site into Senior Housing — The Latino Connection Foundation proposed an $18 million, 100% affordable senior housing project (62+) at the historic Woodward School site. The project features 48 modular mass-timber units, 47 off-street parking spaces, a secure building layout, ADA accessibility improvements, and a small dog park.
  • Friction Over Last-Minute Reallocation of Hidden 2021 HUD ESG Funds — City officials discovered $55,529 in unallocated HUD Emergency Solutions Grant funds from FY2021 just weeks before they would forfeit back to the federal government. To save the funds, the administration rushed to split the money between pre-qualified subrecipients (Christian Churches United, Shalom House, and YWCA) rather than opening a new RFP process.
the annual fee proposed is $119,800 for for that fiscal year Brian McCutchen
approval of the project proposal will enhance the character of the neighborhood and improve the streetscape of the corridor by developing prominent and longstanding vacant Lots with new infill Housing Development Jeffrey Knight

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:19

the time is 5:32 p.m. I would like to

0:22

call our work session to

0:27

order Mr trusdale would you please call

0:30

the

0:31

role Miss

0:33

Daniels

0:35

here Miss Davis presentent Miss green

0:39

present Mr Jones here Miss Rose present

0:44

Mr Rodriguez present Miss Bowers present

0:48

thank you we do not have a long agenda

0:51

so everybody please pay attention and

0:53

we'll try to get through this quite

0:55

expeditiously so I'll begin with the

0:57

administration committee we have one

0:59

resolu ution for discussion that's

1:01

resolution three of 2025 Mr trusdale

1:05

could you please read it into the record

1:08

resolution 3 2025 a resolution

1:10

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

1:12

negotiate and enter into a Professional

1:14

Services agreement with haon

1:15

interpreting Services LLC to provide

1:18

sign language interpreting

1:20

Services thank you uh this is a

1:22

resolution that city council requested

1:25

to be redrafted for the new year um I

1:28

did want to share some of the the

1:30

statistics from last year with houseon

1:32

interpreting Services LLC uh Who

1:35

provided sign language interpretation

1:38

for 15 legislative session meetings for

1:42

a total of 32 hours and a total of $

1:48

5,744

1:50

181 there is one additional invoice from

1:54

November 26th

1:57

2024 that we have not yet received but

2:01

we are expecting it um in the contract

2:05

just to note uh we pay mileage for the

2:08

interpreters to come to um the site and

2:13

meetings two hours and over require two

2:17

interpreters so you you generally see

2:19

two interpreters

2:22

um going back and forth and present

2:25

during our legislative session meetings

2:28

so that's generally how it's been going

2:31

are there any questions related to this

2:33

resolution council

2:35

members okay seeing and hearing none I

2:38

move to add resolution three of 2025 to

2:42

our next legislative session for a

2:48

vote the next committee business you

2:51

will hear this evening will come from

2:53

the budget and finance committee I will

2:55

defer to our budget and finance

2:57

committee chair vice president green to

2:59

lead disc discussion thank you president

3:01

Bowers uh we will be discussing

3:03

resolution 2 of 2025 uh if the budget

3:06

and finance committee or bu budget and

3:08

finance uh Department could come to the

3:09

table please uh the resolution is a

3:12

resolution authorizing the city of

3:13

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

3:15

Professional Services agreement with

3:17

Boer and Ritter LLC to perform the city

3:20

of harrisburg's annual audit and

3:22

financial report for the year ending

3:24

December 31st 2023 in an addendum to the

3:28

Professional Services agreement related

3:30

to the 2022 annual

3:33

audit thank

3:40

you when you're ready if you could just

3:42

introduce yourself and give us a brief

3:51

overview uh yes uh good evening everyone

3:55

uh thank you president Bowers thank you

3:58

chair green um Brian McCutchen

4:01

accounting manager for the city and as

4:04

mentioned the

4:05

resolution uh before you tonight

4:08

2-202 there's two parts to it and the

4:12

way it's laid out in in your packet I

4:16

believe is the first part is the the

4:18

audit Enga proposed audit engagement

4:20

letter for the city's Financial audit uh

4:23

of

4:26

2023 um and well before before I start

4:30

with that I just want to mention to

4:32

joining us tonight uh with me uh here

4:36

for their presence the city uh recently

4:39

uh filled the banking position of

4:41

finance director so it's uh Mr Robert

4:44

kenck Is Here uh for for the city's

4:47

Finance team uh newly arrived and then

4:50

also from our audit firm of Boyer and

4:52

Ritter uh we have uh Matthew wierson uh

4:56

CPA he's the principal lead Auditor in

5:00

charge uh working with with me and our

5:03

finance team and he oversees the um uh

5:08

the the progress of the audit and and of

5:10

course supervises his staff that

5:12

communicate with

5:13

me so again for

5:16

20123 uh the engagement letter is before

5:18

you and it's it's it's detailed in

5:20

length as to uh what it breaks out

5:24

primarily what the city's

5:25

responsibilities are and what the

5:26

auditor's responsibilities are when it

5:28

comes to performing the annual Financial

5:30

audit

5:32

um and the um as far as the uh bring it

5:37

for before you tonight relates to it's

5:40

you know a contract and it needs to be

5:43

reviewed and uh uh V voted upon by city

5:47

council um on page seven of the uh

5:51

engagement letter includes the fees and

5:53

costs associated with conducting the

5:55

audit and for the 2023 audit uh the the

6:00

annual fee proposed is

6:03

$119,800 for for that fiscal

6:07

year

6:08

um I think uh as far as continuing an

6:12

approach on discussion here chair green

6:14

if if you uh wanted to comment or review

6:18

on any uh any of the content or or or

6:21

ask any questions related to the content

6:23

I can I can pause right

6:26

now um right now I don't have many

6:28

questions I guess uh you already went

6:30

over the amount that it would be this

6:31

would be for just for the year 2023

6:33

correct uh correct um I see here the

6:37

supplement you gave us also shows a

6:39

proposed amount for 2024 but we don't

6:40

have anything for that yet right uh not

6:43

not as part of this resolution uh uh uh

6:47

Mr wierson did provide uh very recently

6:51

an engagement letter for the 2024 audit

6:53

but for now we're we're we're working

6:55

with 2023 and also uh you know

6:58

completing the 22 audit which is nearing

7:01

uh its conclusion

7:03

right okay and um just for my

7:05

edification we've been with Boer and

7:07

Ritter since about 2019 start that yes

7:11

starting with the 2019 audit is when

7:13

they uh began their services with the

7:16

city okay and how often do we usually

7:19

review over uh our audit uh contracts um

7:23

I know like every so many years it's

7:25

like good practice to look at different

7:27

Auditors put out of RFP so where are we

7:29

with that that process as well um for an

7:33

extended period we we utilize The Firm

7:35

of Meer duel that did the annual audit

7:38

for several years beginning with the

7:40

2019 audit we we did what you just

7:42

described uh a three-year RFP process

7:46

was uh initiated by the city's audit

7:48

committee and they uh recommended Boer

7:51

and Ritter for the 2019 2020 and 2021

7:55

audits uh within that um RF P was the to

8:01

give the city uh the option of extending

8:03

that RFP uh for two years two one-year

8:06

extensions which which we have done uh

8:09

for the

8:11

2020 uh 2022 year and also what's before

8:14

you tonight for

8:16

2023 okay thank you that's all the

8:19

questions I have at this moment and

8:21

Madam chair just there is the exhibit

8:23

other exhibits of this document is an

8:25

addendum to the 2022 audit for

8:27

additional expenses so there is uh which

8:31

is new which is new you have the prior

8:34

agreement in front of you as one of the

8:35

exhibits an addendum because of the

8:38

increased work that had to occur over

8:40

time and then the proposal for the new

8:42

one okay thank you for clearing that up

8:45

um and so the addendum is a $28,000

8:49

modification yes okay um and so looking

8:52

at looking at that and then looking at

8:54

the proposed amount for 2023 are we

8:56

confident that we don't that we won't

8:58

need that extra modification as well in

9:01

the future if so is that something we've

9:02

reviewed over um to make sure we don't

9:04

find oursel in the same situation yeah

9:07

yeah that's that's the intent um the um

9:11

and this is the second part of course of

9:12

of tonight's resolution uh the handout

9:15

that that Jared distributed for me uh

9:18

reflects a summarized history of audit

9:21

fees and and and again it's it's laid

9:24

out back when at the starting point of

9:27

where where Myer Myer doel left off

9:30

and for

9:31

2022 you can see the

9:34

$145,000 almost

9:36

$146,000 includes the the $28,000

9:40

request proposed modification fee um and

9:45

to to answer your question that the

9:46

following year the 2023 it's it's it's a

9:49

lower fee but that is yes in

9:51

anticipation of being more efficient in

9:54

conducting and Performing uh in

9:57

preparation for what the Auditors need

9:59

to to review uh one thing I'd like to do

10:02

is involve uh the city's uh financial

10:05

analyst that we have on staff certainly

10:07

more uh to to assist with the audit

10:11

preparation um the reasoning behind the

10:14

the the ask for the

10:16

$28,000 increase and again that's that's

10:19

based on um uh Matt's review and his his

10:25

team's uh adjustment based on the the

10:29

availability of the work that we

10:30

provided as far as being prepared for

10:33

the audit you start the audit and you

10:35

want to get them all of the files and

10:38

all of the necessary documentation so

10:40

they can timely uh expedite the

10:42

performance of the audit efficiently

10:45

without any without too many stops and

10:47

starts along the way um with with that

10:51

in mind um there there were numerous

10:55

reasons and and it's not it's not coming

10:57

from the the auditor's independent side

10:59

it's more it's coming from from my

11:01

office's side or or or or me in

11:03

particular um you the three main things

11:07

that occurred that created the stops and

11:09

the starts and what what that does is it

11:12

impedes um the auditor scheduling

11:14

because again Matt supervises his staff

11:18

he coordinates that as to their

11:20

availability and we we tell him oh we

11:22

can get or we can upload all our

11:24

documentation by a certain date in

11:27

anticipation of them being unveil aable

11:29

to to complete their their

11:31

procedures uh 2023 in particular was the

11:35

onset of the new Financial system the uh

11:38

the munus system the

11:40

Erp which created its own stops and

11:42

starts along the way for for for myself

11:45

and various staff within the city coming

11:47

to to grips uh W with the new functions

11:50

and processes of that

11:52

system uh also during that time and

11:56

still currently as you know we the the

11:58

the main main frame system is still in

12:00

effect and the coding is is different as

12:04

far as what we utilize in in munus we we

12:08

were required or we we had to change

12:11

coding on some of our funds just because

12:13

of the functionality of the system so

12:16

there still is that ongoing process of

12:18

recording information from the Treasury

12:21

System which is utilizing the the old

12:23

mainframe system coding wise we have to

12:26

remember that for example the general

12:28

fund in the main frame is fund 01

12:31

whereas in munus it's it's fund 10 that

12:34

sounds very simple but when you apply it

12:36

to the various budget units it's it's

12:38

just an ongoing tracking

12:41

process um also during late 23 and early

12:46

2024 uh I I I was tasked with doing more

12:50

Finance director like task on on a

12:53

reporting on an oversight reporting

12:55

basis three main things uh uh budget

12:58

reporting overseen by uh by by city

13:02

council uh more more input into that

13:05

process more responsibility for

13:08

reporting to our oversight board the the

13:11

I the intergo intergovernmental

13:13

cooperation Authority and The Five-Year

13:16

Plan to develop

13:17

that and then also recently uh the

13:20

finalization of working out the received

13:23

uh American Rescue plan act funds and

13:26

how we manage that and then also the on

13:29

going reporting process that's required

13:31

for federal

13:33

compliance and then of course as you

13:35

know during 2024 the city was without

13:37

two key managerial positions in finance

13:40

namely uh the the business administrator

13:43

and then uh the fats director um so it

13:47

did slow me in in in that terms to be

13:49

able to provide borer and Ritter what

13:51

they needed to avoid them from stopping

13:55

and starting and then having to go back

13:57

and and reassess oh what

13:59

um you know to pick up where we left off

14:01

and and and where we are where we were

14:03

and how much was completed at certain

14:05

points in

14:06

time so that that's my uh my thoughts or

14:10

explanation on that leads up to this uh

14:13

requested additional fee increase for

14:14

the 20120 uh to audit which by the way

14:19

it's it's not finalized but the the the

14:22

statements are in draft form and we're

14:24

working this week to schedule an audit

14:26

committee meeting before to occur before

14:28

the end of this month to finalize the

14:31

concurrence and review of of of that

14:34

Financial audit and then of course we we

14:36

will be moving right into our 2023 audit

14:39

preparation to uh uh make make good

14:43

Headway leading up to that particular

14:46

audit thank you thank you very much um I

14:50

don't have any further questions at this

14:52

time I'm going to open it up to my

14:53

colleagues I'll start to my far right

14:55

with councilwoman Daniels

14:59

no questions for me thank you thank you

15:02

councilwoman Davis good evening no

15:05

questions for me thank you for your work

15:06

y thank

15:08

you thank you president Bowers I don't

15:11

have any questions thank you thank you

15:14

councilwoman Ross thank you and good

15:16

evening I don't have any questions but

15:18

thank

15:19

you thank you councilman Rodriguez thank

15:22

you madam chair thank you director

15:23

McCutchen for joining us always

15:25

informative thank you for that um I have

15:28

no questions right thank you much thank

15:31

you and councilman Jones any questions

15:33

uh yeah I think I'll break the monotony

15:36

simple question how are you today uh

15:39

doing well doing well yes no further

15:41

question thank

15:42

you I'm much better than I was say five

15:45

minutes ago no further questions thank

15:47

you for your work and Madam chair Ju

15:50

Just Just for the public consumption um

15:53

the audit committee is one of the rare

15:54

ones that is a committee of the city

15:55

council you have the appointments um and

15:59

their ultimate answer is to you um the

16:02

uh and the city ordinance does have a

16:05

recommendation in it that every at least

16:08

every five years the committee evaluate

16:11

the ordinance uh and the process by

16:14

which we bring in uh an auditor um so

16:17

we're on that cusp right now uh and I

16:20

would encourage the budget chair to go

16:21

to the next audit committee meeting if

16:22

you can um because I think that they

16:25

have very clear points of view uh on

16:27

what the process should be

16:30

thank you very much Mr

16:32

Grover um I don't think we have any

16:34

further questions I'm going to recommend

16:35

this be on our next legislative agenda

16:38

thank you very good uh thank you all

16:40

appreciate it thank

16:43

you the next committee excuse me the

16:46

next committee business comes from the

16:49

building and housing committee I would

16:51

defer to our building and housing

16:53

committee chair councilwoman Davis to

16:56

lead the

16:57

discussion thank you president Bowers is

17:01

there someone here okay here we go good

17:05

evening good evening the building and

17:09

housing resolution for this evening is

17:12

resolution

17:14

1-22 a resolution allocating the

17:17

remaining emergency solution grants

17:19

program funds from the United States

17:22

Department of Housing and Urban

17:24

Development for fiscal year 2021 and

17:27

authorizing EXP expend of such funds

17:30

ratifying the expenditure of Grant

17:32

Administration cost and extending the

17:36

subrecipient agreements until March 31st

17:42

2025 could you introduce yourself see

17:45

yes uh Sam sakoski business

17:49

administrator thank you Mr Sosi and good

17:53

evening good evening to you okay I had

17:57

an opportunity to review this um

18:03

resolution and I did have one a couple

18:07

of questions so the ESG funds for fiscal

18:11

years 2020

18:13

2021 initiated with a balance of

18:17

$334,800

18:19

in which

18:24

$167,600 was allocated for 2021

18:28

and then the other

18:33

$167,100 was allocated for

18:37

2020

18:41

2021 okay so remaining we have

18:51

[Music]

18:55

$5,595 55,57

18:59

but when I did the calculation I came up

19:02

with

19:09

5,539 so I'll let you take a look at

19:12

that and are you on page uh one of the

19:17

resolution

19:18

um let's

19:23

see I am on

19:29

line

19:30

six so let me see if I can open it up

19:33

here my

19:35

computer okay um I'm sorry what was

19:40

that okay look at line 60 please line

19:44

six or 60 I did note in my notes Here

19:49

line

19:50

60 Mr

19:54

SMI so I believe the remaining is 5

19:57

55,000 539 instead of

20:07

55529

20:13

okay I didn't do the mass so you could

20:15

be right um but the basic premise of

20:18

this is that there was money

20:20

appropriated in March of

20:26

2021 um for or and uh I think the total

20:31

appropriation was in the neighborhood of

20:35

$112,000 there was

20:38

55,500 something dollars still left over

20:41

that was

20:42

unappropriated so what this resolution

20:44

does is it finally appropriates that

20:48

money for four

20:51

things okay they appropriate

20:54

appropriating $1,461

20:58

uh for administrative fees or

21:02

administrative

21:03

cost that administrative cost is

21:06

actually from 2019 that was never

21:09

appropriated so we're catching up 2019

21:12

with with with a Hut appropriation in

21:15

this Grant from

21:17

2021 how much is it Mr s Fe

21:21

10,461 01 is what's being administ is is

21:25

being appropriated for administrative

21:27

cost okay that goes to towards

21:30

offsetting um salaries right okay okay I

21:34

have to pull this up on my phone now I

21:36

didn't realize I couldn't see

21:38

it

21:41

okay the other three

21:43

Appropriations goes to in the amounts of

21:47

15,000 well in the resolution says

21:52

$22.67 goes to

21:55

CCU 15,22

21:58

66 cents goes to the

22:00

YWCA CCU Christian churches United

22:07

yeah Christian churches United

22:13

that's and Mr sski I did see the

22:17

allocations but one question I had is

22:20

out of the

22:22

allocations um the capitol area

22:24

Coalition of homelessness was not

22:26

included this time and I'm just

22:28

wondering well they're warning to

22:31

three recipients from prior monies so

22:34

these are already

22:36

three um recipients they're just adding

22:39

to those

22:40

Appropriations right and they were uh

22:42

allocated money the first time and I was

22:45

just wondering why they weren't

22:46

allocated any of this why they weren't

22:50

allocated at that time no this

22:54

time so well I think they just now

22:57

became aware that there was was was not

22:59

appropriated in 2019 the 10,

23:04

4611 and in

23:06

20121 the other the other

23:09

monies were not appropriated I mean part

23:12

of the 164 167 was appropriated but not

23:17

the entire amount and Madam chair we can

23:19

get you an answer to this I think she's

23:20

saying it's a fourth organization that

23:23

received money before that isn't in this

23:25

they receive this other subot because

23:27

they're the de designated whatever

23:30

there's there's an acronym for it um and

23:32

part of our money is simply a pass

23:34

through and that's what catches they

23:35

don't even have to apply for it there's

23:37

a pot within the federal funds that they

23:39

get for coordinating homeless uh things

23:41

and and you a chart a a charart what is

23:45

I can't remember the acronym for it but

23:47

but it's a but but there's a certain

23:48

organization designated like the

23:51

equivalent yeah I just can't get the

23:53

name off the top of but but we can get

23:55

you the clarification but they would not

23:56

have been a subrecipient where they

23:58

apply

23:59

they're we are simply a pass through to

24:01

them because they're the only qualified

24:02

entity for the money they got as the

24:05

original part so this is the money that

24:08

was left over for subrecipients as

24:10

opposed to that pass through portion of

24:11

the money okay so that explains why the

24:15

Capital Area Coalition of homelessness

24:17

received money an allocation the first

24:21

round right and but out of a out of a

24:23

particular part of the pot that's

24:25

they're the only ones who can have it I

24:28

understand now thank you for that

24:31

clarification okay so currently CCU

24:34

Shalom House and the

24:36

YCA is included in the ratification of

24:40

this next set of funds okay thank you

24:43

the other question I have before I open

24:46

questioning up to my colleagues is do

24:49

the organizations have the same uh have

24:52

to meet the same

24:55

qualifications each round of funding do

24:58

they have to meet the same

25:00

qualifications

25:03

um so that's a fairly that's a depends

25:06

answer and that they meant the

25:08

qualifications when they applied and I

25:11

don't know that anyone went back and

25:12

said because it's for that same fiscal

25:14

year that's when they had to be eligible

25:17

um if there's information there's

25:19

something different about the

25:20

organization now that's I'm unaware of

25:22

that I'm not saying that's not possible

25:24

but but each time they come in for a new

25:27

fiscal year they have to meet the app

25:29

Meet the uh the conditions at that time

25:33

so this is an older fiscal year where

25:34

they were already qualified and

25:37

pre-qualified and all they're trying to

25:38

do is divide up the remaining money so

25:40

they don't have to give it back to the

25:41

federal government that's what they're

25:42

trying to trying to do okay so so when

25:45

they come back around to try to um

25:48

distribute the remaining money do they

25:50

have to again show that they have

25:53

insurances I would say that to be

25:56

requalified to what was it re-qualify to

25:59

re-qualify so in other words do they

26:01

have to provide so if in other words if

26:04

you're going to 2023 or 20124 they'd

26:07

have to reapply and be reconsidered okay

26:09

so currently they don't have to supply

26:12

any type of documentation they can just

26:14

considered to well they awarded the

26:16

money in

26:17

2021 so they were the three places that

26:20

got awarded money so we just

26:24

reappropriated at that time which was

26:26

the 55,000

26:28

right right giv each one of them one

26:30

third of that money okay so it wasn't

26:32

allocated at that time right so they're

26:36

just coming back to to allocate the

26:38

money to them and they don't have to

26:39

re-qualify or anything okay provide any

26:43

documentation or anything they just no

26:45

they provided the documentation at that

26:48

at that time at the beginning so when

26:50

you guys voted on in March of 22 they

26:52

were fully qualified at that time and

26:54

went through that process okay okay and

26:57

in between March 22 and now they would

26:59

have been providing the documentation of

27:01

how they're using the money that was

27:02

previously awarded to them so there's

27:04

like an ongoing working relationship

27:06

between dbhd and the recipient so they

27:10

have so that would that's how they got

27:12

to the three entities to do it because

27:14

they're still working with them on the

27:16

prior money so so I I missed that so

27:20

you're saying that they don't have to

27:21

reapply for this money this this is not

27:24

this is the same thing but they have an

27:25

ongoing working relationship basically

27:27

the city got down to and I can't tell

27:29

you what the thinking was when they did

27:30

the appropriation because they could

27:32

have awarded it then to the

27:34

subrecipients uh that in order not to

27:38

send the money back to the federal

27:39

government you have till March there's

27:41

three contracts that exist which you can

27:42

addend with three qualified entities

27:45

that have an ongoing relationship

27:46

because they're they report on the money

27:48

we already gave them on an ongoing basis

27:51

so is this part of the and I don't mean

27:53

to jump in but I'm just trying to follow

27:56

along here with um this is some of the

27:58

money where they had some of the

27:59

conflict at right no money not that I

28:03

know these are not the three that I know

28:05

of different

28:07

year so we had so that was 22 and 23

28:11

that's is 21 okay all right I'm just

28:14

trying to make sure yeah yeah it is a

28:17

who's on first kind of thing so it just

28:19

is and that's what I'm saying though

28:20

because if if it's being uh reissued or

28:24

or or allocated to them and and you're

28:27

saying that they don't have to to so so

28:29

the difference is that for the 22 23

28:31

when the issue came up there people that

28:32

had the issues they they ended up not

28:34

getting a contract there's already a

28:36

contract with each of these entities to

28:38

serve out of this pot of money for that

28:41

fiscal year so yeah I'll wait to ask I

28:44

think she made it okay thank you so okay

28:49

so does do the organizations have to

28:52

match again with this Al new allocation

28:57

so for example CCU is now getting um

29:03

15,000 do they need to come up with a

29:06

match I think that was one of the

29:09

qualifications the first time the with

29:12

the first allocation do they need to

29:13

come up with a

29:15

match this time around uh I don't know

29:17

the answer to that question I can get

29:19

you to answer to that

29:21

question yeah I'm just trying to

29:23

understand sure what that's a that's a

29:25

very it's a very good question I just I

29:27

don't know the answer sitting here to to

29:29

that question do you Mr Sakowski I

29:32

didn't realize

29:34

I no I didn't ask that question so I

29:36

don't have an answer to it either and

29:38

you have my document so I can't read it

29:44

so okay at this time I'll open up for

29:46

questions I'll start with to my right um

29:49

councilwoman Daniels do you have any

29:52

questions yes so my understanding is

29:55

that we have a limited period to spend

29:57

down

29:58

uh different funds so is this out of the

30:02

period because these are 2021 funds we

30:05

have until um

30:08

March 31st of

30:11

2025 to spend

30:13

them so there so it is it is under time

30:16

constraint yeah can you give me like the

30:18

statute or the regulations that allows

30:21

for such a long period because my

30:22

understanding was the maximum was two

30:24

years

30:28

that was provided to the workout plan

30:30

submitted by um yeah I yeah I would like

30:34

the regulation that says that we can

30:36

extend that that this use is permissible

30:40

that that the funds that were're we're

30:42

allowed to use the funds outside of a

30:45

two-year period I mean the regulation

30:47

might say that we could use the funds

30:49

within a fiveyear period or six I would

30:51

just like to see the regulation that

30:52

says that I'll have to defer that to the

30:55

law Bureau yeah that would be great so I

30:58

there's a regulation but then I think on

31:00

top of that there is an an extension

31:02

letter which HUD issued which is what

31:04

set the March 31st date but I I can get

31:07

you both of those things yes please sure

31:12

and I think that's it for me thank

31:15

you thank you councilwoman Daniels vice

31:18

president green

31:20

questions um not not really many

31:23

questions just um any idea why why it

31:25

took so long I guess you know like why

31:28

it took so long for us to get to this

31:29

point um I think it was just discovered

31:32

that that was not the 55,000 was not

31:35

appropriated so I don't think it I think

31:38

it was just a recent discovery to tell

31:40

you the truth okay all right well that's

31:43

interesting that's the only question I

31:44

have right now thank

31:46

you thank you president

31:49

Bowers thank you uh many of my questions

31:52

have been asked and answered but I just

31:54

have two so it was just discovered who

31:57

made this disc Discovery and who is able

32:00

to answer these questions would that be

32:03

the interim director of building and

32:04

housing or someone

32:07

else

32:10

um I don't think she's the one that

32:12

actually found it I think was one her

32:14

one of her assistants in her office that

32:17

did so I'll have to and when did she

32:20

just make this discovery if there were

32:23

no if we don't know the regulations that

32:27

councilwoman Daniel at Daniel's

32:29

requested to see and then we don't know

32:34

when the letter was issue the extension

32:37

letter so the regulation is a two-year

32:39

window the question is from when to when

32:41

and then there was I know there were

32:43

applications made to HUD we don't

32:44

participate in those out of our office

32:46

but and that HUD gave answers to them

32:48

that response is what triggered a

32:50

request our office to to create

32:52

addendums to the contract okay which we

32:55

then advise had to come back to the

32:56

council under the plan La language or

32:58

the prior resolution which said addendum

33:01

so any any additional allocation has to

33:02

come back to the council so there is

33:04

there is a trail I just don't sitting

33:06

here I don't have the trail with me okay

33:09

so okay well I think if we could please

33:12

share the trail or the timeline and

33:14

identify the dates when the discovery

33:17

was made who made the discovery

33:20

and the additional

33:23

HUD timeline yeah we'll coordinate with

33:26

the business administration and dbhd to

33:28

get the council what it needs okay thank

33:30

you I don't have any other questions

33:32

thank

33:33

you councilwoman R thank you um

33:37

councilwoman Davis um I have the same

33:40

questions especially since the money was

33:43

just um discovered just kind of what is

33:46

the

33:46

regulation um where's the extension

33:49

letter just to make sure we're um

33:51

following all the correct procedures

33:53

when it comes to um allocating this

33:56

money my second question

33:58

um was I was just kind of just a little

34:02

bit confused on um why there wasn't

34:06

maybe uh another application process for

34:09

maybe other entities to request this

34:12

money or why I did hear um solicitor

34:15

Grover explain that these um certain

34:18

entities receive the money because they

34:20

already have a working relationship um

34:23

with the city and receiving the money

34:24

and I do understand that but then once

34:26

new money was discovered

34:28

I was just wondering why maybe there

34:30

wasn't a way to um kind of spread the

34:33

wealth you would say and see if other um

34:37

company I don't want to say companies

34:38

but resources in the city who may also

34:41

need the same type of money who help the

34:44

same um individuals or population could

34:48

also apply for that money so that would

34:50

do you have that answer I just don't

34:52

think you actually have the time to do

34:54

that because if you have to spend it

34:56

down in six weeks

34:58

how you going go through a process to to

35:00

screen anybody to award it that's going

35:02

to take longer you're just going to have

35:04

to turn the money back over because

35:05

you're not going to have time to go

35:06

through a process like that so the the

35:09

quickest way to to comply with this was

35:12

to award it to already people are

35:14

already cleared of that process okay and

35:17

these are the only individuals that are

35:19

cleared those are the three that for

35:21

that particular year that were cleared

35:23

okay thank you no you're welcome okay

35:26

I'm done

35:28

thank you councilman Rodriguez thank you

35:31

madam chair um thank you for joining us

35:34

this evening you're welcome uh do we

35:35

know if the entities had entered their

35:38

annual action plan um previous to August

35:41

16th of

35:43

21 I don't know that answer because I

35:45

didn't ask that question okay I just I'm

35:47

just reading from the uh resolution

35:49

itself where whereas the 2021 act annual

35:52

action plan has been completed made

35:54

available for public comment and was

35:55

submitted and approved by city council

35:57

for Harrisburg and so is consideration

36:00

therefore the council does now make an

36:02

ordain the following enactment um but it

36:05

also does say actual plan is approved

36:08

strive to meet

36:11

the pretty much um stating if they

36:15

didn't have that plan in they would

36:17

pretty much lose the allocation but then

36:20

line 62 of uh the same documents says

36:24

use of any unallocated funding in will

36:27

requ require a separate allocation and

36:29

Council approval so that's why perhaps

36:31

this body was thinking there would be a

36:34

separate uh procedure or process to

36:36

allocate this specific unallocated

36:38

funding this is the separate for

36:42

entities though because because of the

36:44

clock okay the action plan is the city's

36:47

action plan which the council did vote

36:49

on and that's that you get the fiveyear

36:51

plan and the one-year plan okay and so

36:54

then you have to meet the goals that are

36:56

stated in the five year plan and show in

36:58

each one-year plan you're doing it so

37:00

these entities were identified then in

37:03

this process as being able to satisfy

37:05

Our obligation Under The Five-Year Plan

37:07

and the annual plan okay so these

37:09

entities would be in compliance they

37:11

were and this again goes to the 2021

37:13

money and the standard or what they get

37:15

what measured against is not now but

37:17

when the money was awarded by the

37:19

federal government okay okay and I mean

37:21

to your point of it'd be difficult to

37:24

put together a procedure within the 4

37:26

to6 we agree and these are some things

37:28

we've echoed time and time again when we

37:30

were given something that was done in a

37:32

four-week two week three we process so

37:35

we similarly Echo your statements as

37:37

well um but I have no further questions

37:39

Madam chair thank

37:40

you thank you councilman Jones yes um my

37:45

question is uh I don't even know if it's

37:47

for you um some of the question that

37:50

were asked by my colleagues you you

37:52

pretty much couldn't answer like when

37:54

was this uh money rediscovered

37:58

uh so to speak it was recent I just

38:00

don't know the exact date right so what

38:03

I mean is there a reason why the

38:04

director in that department is not

38:06

here is there a reason for that I mean

38:09

because we have questions and I think we

38:11

owe um our residents a clear and concise

38:16

understanding of where because there

38:17

were a lot of complaints about this cdbg

38:19

money so I think that someone has to

38:22

answer these questions and um versus

38:24

emails and stuff like that I think these

38:26

are sessions for us to share with our

38:28

public U what's going on so hopefully at

38:31

some point the director will come in

38:33

front of council um this we've been

38:36

requesting the director to come several

38:38

times to no avail um but we do need

38:41

these questions answers for our public

38:43

so I really won't bombard you with many

38:45

because I know you don't really have uh

38:47

the answers to some of the things that

38:49

we are seeking but hopefully we can get

38:51

the director down here at some point and

38:54

I have no further questions Madam chair

38:56

may I I just have one yes go ahead um

38:59

would you be able to just give a brief

39:01

overhaul on what would go into the grant

39:03

Administration fees because that fee

39:05

alone at 104 is pretty much as much as a

39:08

grant at 15 or

39:11

1522 um what would all go into those

39:14

fees my understanding is it's

39:16

predominant

39:17

salaries okay so the salary for the

39:20

grant writer or for the employees in

39:23

that department okay

39:25

okay interesting that portion is a

39:28

ratification if you know if you look at

39:30

the language of this one it's a

39:32

ratification because in they had

39:34

underestimated as I understand that the

39:36

the amount of administrative Cost U

39:39

there's a percentage they allow and and

39:41

we were under but they actually then

39:43

have to report the time and work that

39:45

they do on the HUD reporting and so they

39:47

had not put enough in the original

39:48

budget so the money was being spent

39:50

administratively that's why that part's

39:52

back as a ratification that was sort of

39:55

discovering and cleaning this up I will

39:56

note it's pretty unusual and I don't

39:58

know why that it all isn't allocated the

40:01

first time out right that's part I don't

40:03

I don't have an answer for you what the

40:05

thinking was I just have no clue but I

40:07

just want to make a correction for the

40:09

record that um I said director and I

40:11

meant to say inum so just make make sure

40:14

we got that

40:15

on the thing that got me though is that

40:18

you appropriated the the the money in

40:21

2019 but you put it 100% towards

40:24

programs and nothing towards

40:25

administrators so this is a attempt in

40:27

the 21 in the unallocated 55,000 to

40:31

recapture the money from 2019 that

40:34

should have been allocated to

40:35

Administration which was

40:39

not now why the 55,000 in 2021 wasn't

40:44

allocated that was u a mayor ago and

40:47

that was probably two businessman

40:50

business administrators ago too so why

40:52

they did it I have no idea so these

40:54

funds were primarily just sitting in a

40:56

pot

40:59

not drawn down yet not drawn down right

41:00

yeah they weren't drawn down no further

41:03

questions Madam chair thank you okay

41:05

thank you are there any other questions

41:07

from any council

41:09

members okay well thank you for being

41:11

here this evening I would submit that uh

41:14

we would um come back for another work

41:17

session when all of the documentation

41:20

can be provided okay thank you I I would

41:23

suggest to you that that that's going to

41:25

make meeting the March 31 dead line that

41:28

much more

41:30

difficult no I would ask that if well

41:33

I'm I'm again this is what this is why

41:35

we should have U you know the inum

41:39

director here because we keep getting

41:41

put at the last hour we got to make

41:43

these decisions and and it's just not

41:45

fair what I would suggest which we've

41:47

done before the council's done before is

41:49

to at the next meeting schedule a

41:51

back-to-back legislative exe that

41:53

doesn't guarantee that she will show up

41:55

yeah but if you have that first

41:57

that work session ahead of it right then

41:59

you'll know whether you have enough

42:01

information to vote at the legislative

42:03

session which I mean you you can do that

42:05

to satisfy or you can suspend the rules

42:07

at the legislative session and if you do

42:09

not have enough information to vote um

42:13

you know but that's at the end of the

42:14

day this money goes to to taking care of

42:16

homeless people in Harrisburg absolutely

42:18

but just just exactly what the business

42:20

manager was saying it's difficult to

42:22

come up with a process and to execute

42:24

within like a six to 8 week period that

42:26

would take us primarily about eight

42:28

weeks out Mar you know March 31st we're

42:30

going into February 1 soon so I just I

42:34

get what you're saying trust me I do and

42:35

it's just a difficult it's just a

42:37

difficult position to be in I I I don't

42:39

I'm not disputing it's a difficult

42:41

position I'm just I I I just I think

42:43

everyone knows we have a homeless

42:44

problem that is is insurmountable

42:46

unhoused I would like say

42:51

so if I might say one last thing um I

42:54

did send out an email some time ago

42:58

saying if you had specific questions for

43:00

the director that those could be

43:02

submitted in writing we shouldn't have

43:04

to keep communicating through email

43:06

again the public the public it's not

43:08

like they didn't respond they it's not

43:09

like she refused to answer the questions

43:12

so can I ask you again why hasn't she

43:13

come that's up to the mayor that's not

43:16

it's not to me that's up to the mayor

43:17

she has an answer to me gotcha actually

43:20

is there any way we could have

43:21

representatives from these entities here

43:24

um this way we could just because

43:26

primarily when we awarded 500,000 to two

43:29

separate entities earlier in the year or

43:31

last year um we were told you know beds

43:34

would open things would happen I'm still

43:37

trying to assist families getting into

43:39

those doors and it's just not true so I

43:41

don't know if that's taken care of their

43:42

administrative causes and their salaries

43:44

but we do have an oath to the resident

43:46

so if it's not opening up more services

43:48

you talking about the homeless shelters

43:49

or what absolutely my understand I heard

43:51

today that this work this is the work I

43:53

actually do for a living and I walk

43:55

families to these entities and they're

43:56

saying we have no beds we have no

43:58

openings and this is a consistent basis

44:01

I heard today from the fire department

44:03

that there are beds available they wen't

44:05

being utilized we can fill this room up

44:07

with families that need Sheltering right

44:09

now in the Subzero freezing I just left

44:12

two this morning CC was a recipient of

44:15

$500,000 just last year right but I was

44:18

also told this afternoon by the fire

44:20

department that there were beds

44:22

available that not being utilized thank

44:24

you everyone can we wrap this up heard

44:27

that's all Mr we have we have questions

44:30

yeah we we definitely do have question

44:31

we have questions and we're doing our

44:33

work for the people allow us to do that

44:36

please anyone have any other questions

44:38

it would be good to see the directors of

44:40

these entities come in and answer some

44:42

questions because if we can be

44:43

guaranteed their services would open and

44:45

this additional Etc would allow more

44:48

services to take place that would be pie

44:50

in the sky but if we're just covering

44:52

administrative costs and Etc then what

44:55

service are we really doing what good

44:56

are we we really do but going back to

44:59

the solicitor's comment I think the

45:01

answers that you asked there was what

45:02

three or four of them I think we can get

45:04

those to you in writing within the next

45:08

week or so thank you sir so um actually

45:10

I would encourage since there is a Time

45:13

U crunch of May March 31st that delaying

45:17

the decision would

45:19

be difficult i' be willing to go to any

45:23

meeting needed or you know have Madam

45:25

chair lead the lead the SP had the task

45:27

but I just would like to find out some

45:29

more information cuz we've kind of been

45:31

down this road before so so the one

45:33

thing I would encourage is is because of

45:35

your request which I think is a fair

45:37

request is it's just going to take a

45:38

little coordination that everyone's in

45:40

agreement when the meeting's happening

45:41

so we have these people invited if from

45:44

the organizations um you've certainly

45:46

invited members of the organizations

45:48

before to to speak to this Council so I

45:51

think you have to coordinate with your

45:52

council president with the clerk's

45:54

office um and then with dbh has to name

45:57

the individuals they're talking about

45:59

and that's that could all happen quickly

46:01

but it's just going to take some

46:02

coordination just for the record it's

46:03

not to make any statements about the

46:05

Integrity or you know uh parameters of

46:08

these entities is just to ensure we're

46:09

double-checking Crossing every T and do

46:11

and every on our behalf that's all and

46:13

and I don't want to put words in your

46:14

mouth but I think what I heard you say

46:16

is if this money is awarded and all it

46:18

does is pay for further Administration

46:20

by the entities getting it what then

46:22

what then is that helping any homeless

46:23

people I get I I think that was your

46:25

point so and I think think that's a fair

46:27

public question to ask anybody what are

46:29

your spending your tax dollars on

46:30

Absolut well I mean yeah ours as well

46:32

but the res that absolutely thank

46:37

you thank you everyone and I'll turn it

46:40

back over to you president

46:42

Bowers okay so I just want to be clear

46:44

what your pleasure is shair Davis on how

46:47

you like to proceed I know you don't

46:49

want this resolution added to the next

46:52

legislative session agenda but how would

46:54

you like to proceed for uh the responses

46:57

that we're waiting for from the

46:59

administration I just want to make sure

47:01

I'm clear okay thank you I think you

47:03

said within a week you could have all of

47:06

the

47:07

documentation that can all be here for

47:09

next Tuesday the question is do you want

47:10

to proceed with this next Tuesday I

47:13

think part of that's up to the council

47:14

president if she wants to schedule it or

47:15

have a suspension of the rules but as

47:17

the chair of the who oversees this

47:19

committee uh you could put it on the

47:21

legislative agenda and then withdraw it

47:24

if you're not satisfied and table it um

47:27

but if you if you move it now then the

47:29

next legislative session is

47:33

February second week of February before

47:36

we'd have have a have another vote if

47:38

that's the February 11th yeah so and uh

47:43

and I don't I don't know what the the

47:45

cut off date of impossibility is right I

47:47

just I I don't know how much time it

47:49

takes to to to get through the process

47:52

um you know they're simply going to be

47:53

doing as I understand the work they've

47:55

already been doing was the General pit

47:56

pitch that came through our office um so

47:59

uh but I don't know what the cut off

48:00

date where it becomes impossible to

48:02

accomplish it so okay I'm satisfied with

48:06

that we can go ahead and move it to I

48:09

would submit to move this to the next

48:11

legislative session and president Bowers

48:15

will have the opportunity to decide from

48:18

there thank you okay thank

48:21

you our final committee business this

48:24

evening comes from the community and

48:26

economic development committee I will

48:28

defer to our community and economic

48:31

development committee chair chair

48:33

Daniels to lead the

48:36

discussion thank you Mr Trel could you

48:38

read the the the regulation record

48:43

resolution 81 2024 a resolution

48:46

approving the preliminary final law

48:48

consolidation and land development plan

48:49

submitted by Amber belli representing

48:51

Latino connection Foundation to

48:53

consolidate three Parcels uh one 1 North

48:57

18 Street 1800 Bo Street in an

49:00

unaddressed parcel and develop a

49:02

four-story 48 unit residential building

49:04

with Associated site in Access

49:08

improvements thank you um could someone

49:10

from the city um give us a little bit of

49:13

the procedural history of this request

49:15

uh yes uh good evening Council Jeffrey

49:17

Knight planning director with the city

49:19

of Harrisburg um so uh as Mr trusdale

49:23

read uh this project is proposing

49:27

uh to consolidate three separate Parcels

49:29

that make up the site of the Old

49:30

Woodward School uh building which has

49:32

been vacant since its demolition I think

49:34

somewhere around 2011 um and uh as some

49:39

members of council may remember that

49:40

we've had a couple of development

49:42

proposals come through uh for this

49:44

project in the P or this property uh in

49:47

the past um none of them have obviously

49:50

gone um through to completion uh so this

49:53

is um another one that we are kind of

49:55

hoping will be uh the final proposal uh

49:59

that uh the council sees so that we're

50:01

um able to see some affordable housing

50:03

going up on site here uh the project uh

50:07

proposes uh the construction of a 3unit

50:11

uh or three story 48 unit affordable

50:14

housing project uh with onsite um site

50:18

and access improvements including the

50:20

construction of I believe a 47 uh space

50:24

accessory parking lot uh that's

50:25

accessible from boa Street uh in

50:28

addition uh there will be a small dog

50:31

park in the northeastern corner of the

50:34

site um that uh at least for now uh will

50:37

be limited to uh residents uh of the

50:40

property and project um The Proposal

50:44

required uh the filing of various um

50:46

zoning relief requests uh which were

50:48

filed in November of 2023 uh and

50:51

approved that same month uh and the uh

50:54

current proposal was submitted uh I

50:55

believe in October

50:57

uh 3rd of 2024 uh and reviewed and

51:00

approved by the Planning Commission uh

51:02

the following month at their November

51:03

6th 20124 meeting um as a part of the

51:08

project um the applicants will be doing

51:11

various site improvements around uh the

51:13

project site including uh reconstructing

51:16

sidewalks along 18th Bois and H Street

51:19

uh and 88 ramps uh they've been in a

51:21

pretty close coordination with the city

51:24

Engineers office to ensure that those

51:26

aspects of the project are developed

51:28

correctly um and in conformance with our

51:31

various

51:33

regulations and uh with that all being

51:35

said uh the Planning Commission has

51:38

recommended that city council approve

51:42

the request with the following

51:44

conditions uh the applicant is required

51:46

to receive a certificate of

51:48

qualification pursuant to chapter 12101

51:50

of title 12 the affordable housing

51:52

certification prior to recording the

51:54

loot consolidation and land development

51:56

plan with the Dolphin County recorder of

51:57

deeds uh and that is because the um

52:00

applicant is uh seeking to have this be

52:02

a 100% affordable project um and has uh

52:05

secured uh some of the zoning bonuses

52:08

that were that are afforded to those

52:09

types of projects um prior to city

52:12

council review of the project uh the

52:13

applicant must be provide information

52:15

regarding the economic development

52:16

impact of the project such as

52:17

construction value effect on taxes and

52:19

jobs generated allow the council members

52:21

to fully understand the impact of the

52:23

project uh the planning Bureau

52:24

recommends that the applicant coordinate

52:26

with the city engineer on the

52:27

prohibition of on street parking along

52:29

the north side of boa Street between

52:30

Long Street and North 18th Street to

52:33

allow for easier and safer access to the

52:35

accessory parking lot um and this is

52:37

because the um council members May uh be

52:41

aware that B Street is two directions uh

52:44

this location um and while it is two

52:47

directions the street is fairly narrow

52:49

uh and uh there's no parking on the

52:52

south side of the street um but on the

52:55

north side of the street there's still

52:56

is parking so in order to uh provide

52:59

safer um vehicular circulation to and

53:02

through the site um it is our

53:03

recommendation to remove I believe

53:05

approx approximately three spaces along

53:07

Bo Street there to uh enable uh people

53:10

uh residents and visitors uh to get into

53:12

the surface parking lot there um the

53:14

applicant must construct the reconstruct

53:16

the north 18 Street sidewalk to match

53:18

the full width of the existing sidewalk

53:19

between the property line in the curb uh

53:21

the planning Bureau recommends that Bo

53:23

Street sidewalk also be fully

53:24

reconstructed although acknowledges this

53:26

would represent an expansion of the

53:27

existing sidewalk um and this references

53:30

the fact that um there's probably like a

53:32

8ot wide concrete sidewalk along North

53:34

18th Street but between that sidewalk

53:37

and the back of the curb face um that

53:39

was paved with asphalt as far back as

53:41

when the the uh school was there uh so

53:44

we want to make sure that that full

53:45

width of that sidewalk along the

53:47

frontage of the property is

53:49

reconstructed uh the applicant should

53:51

consider a vertically differentiated

53:53

facade treatment and materials to

53:54

reflect the architectural design and

53:56

elements of the surrounding neighborhood

53:58

um and Council may remember we've made

54:00

this recommendation in a couple other

54:01

cases where you're building a multif

54:04

family dwelling uh in a what's otherwise

54:06

a row home uh community and so to just

54:09

help the project blend in a little bit

54:10

better so it doesn't look so

54:11

aesthetically singular and kind of

54:13

Blocky uh this would help um kind of

54:16

match the existing architectural

54:18

aesthetic um in the neighborhood uh and

54:20

finally the applicant should coordinate

54:22

with the city urst on the use of native

54:24

tree species and pollinator plants

54:27

uh the Planning Commission recommended

54:29

that the city council approve the

54:31

request with the for the following

54:32

reasons uh the applicant receiv receives

54:34

approve received approval of the zoning

54:36

relief requests necessary to effectuate

54:38

the project as proposed at the November

54:40

20 2023 zhb meeting the Planning

54:43

Commission and Zoning hearing board

54:44

previously approved a proposal for a

54:46

similar development in September of 2020

54:48

although that approval was automatically

54:50

revoked per section 7-

54:52

323.50 of the zoning code after a land

54:55

development plan was not filed

54:56

and the project design has been modified

54:58

to be less intensive than that previous

55:00

proposal the project spite project site

55:03

is in a conspicuous location on a state

55:05

route and the applicant has incorporated

55:06

design elements that maximize the

55:08

potential of the site including the

55:09

provision of sufficient all street

55:11

parking and incorporation of amenities

55:13

such as a dog park and finally approval

55:15

of the project will proposal will

55:17

enhance the character of the

55:18

neighborhood and improve the streetcape

55:20

of the corridor by developing prominent

55:22

and long-standing vacant Lots with new

55:24

infill Housing Development and site

55:26

improvements providing affordable

55:28

housing and demand throughout the

55:34

city thank you so right now we just have

55:36

the locked um consolidation

55:41

right um could could you uh the lot

55:43

consolidation would be a component of

55:46

this um application and

55:50

approval okay um so um if the applicant

55:55

wouldn't mind uh coming to the

55:56

microphone introducing yourselves and

55:59

just as as briefly as possible share

56:01

with us um the project timelines um and

56:07

yeah that's it I'm Dr Amber burelli I'm

56:11

the interm executive director for lcf or

56:14

Latino connection foundation and the

56:16

developer on this project and I'll pass

56:18

it over to Matt from

56:20

Eustace at wits with Eustace engineering

56:22

we were the site civil engineer did the

56:24

site work design on this this

56:27

project I can give you a a very quick

56:30

one minute tour of our plan that we have

56:32

up here just to get you oriented if

56:34

you'd

56:36

like as Mr Knight pointed out this is at

56:38

the corner of her Street and 18th Street

56:41

so on my plan here 18th Street is at the

56:43

bottom of the plan her Street's on the

56:46

leth hand side and boas is on the right

56:48

hand side it is a big vacant open grass

56:51

lot now consists of three uh Parcels

56:54

that we are consolidating as part of

56:56

this the same application for the Land

56:57

Development uh Latino connection would

57:00

like to propose or is proposing a

57:02

four-story multif family building uh for

57:05

senior affordable housing it'll have 48

57:08

uh individual units there'll be walkup

57:11

units so there'll be elevators inside

57:13

couple of entrances on the outside could

57:15

be a secure building as well for the

57:16

residents with the building we're going

57:18

to put a 47 space parking lot in behind

57:21

the building um it was 48 initially

57:24

we've gotten some feedback back from DFA

57:26

they wanted us to increase the Ada uh

57:28

parking spaces I think we have eight or

57:31

nine accessible units they wanted a

57:32

minimum of eight accessible spaces so we

57:35

reduce the parking by one still in

57:37

compliance with uh all the zoning

57:39

regulations and um parking counts and

57:41

everything else uh we'll have new sewer

57:44

water uh to the site uh new fire the

57:47

whole thing will be

57:48

sprinklered um there is a new storm

57:50

water basin going in underneath this

57:52

building this kind of this dashed

57:53

outline or underneath the uh the parking

57:55

lot excuse me

57:56

um that'll run out to boas underground

57:59

to there's a a combined sewer in in boas

58:03

and that's going to help with uh the

58:04

storm water runoff we have to take

58:05

everything back to uh the way it is now

58:08

after we build the building and the

58:09

parking lot um Mr I mentioned a small

58:13

dog park uh area it's going to be a

58:15

fenced in area for the residents to use

58:17

to take their dogs out to walk we are

58:18

going to allow um the residents to have

58:21

smaller dogs I think there's a cut off

58:23

for size or weight limit and things like

58:25

that uh and then we'll have um off

58:28

Street uh trash uh and recycling uh in

58:31

an enclosure uh in the back off of Long

58:33

Street which is an alley with Kung

58:36

Street as

58:37

well um we are going to leave an area

58:39

open for uh potential gardening area for

58:42

the residents as well try to give them

58:44

some space of their own if they want to

58:46

do some sort of like small garden pots

58:49

something of that

58:55

nature thank

58:57

you um so I think what I'll do is um

59:02

I'll just open up to my colleagues to

59:04

ask questions since you're all in a

59:06

better position to visualize what's

59:09

happening so I'll start to my far left

59:12

with with Mr Jones Thank You

59:14

councilwoman Daniels hello how are

59:16

you good sure come on man chip her up a

59:19

little bit we're great we're warm it's

59:22

cool it's warm inside here you know all

59:24

right um

59:27

yes Dr burelli so I will um just give

59:31

you a couple questions uh one of the

59:35

things that I want to make sure of again

59:37

uh per our conversation um just making

59:40

sure that our residents are

59:43

in concurrence with this project uh I

59:47

know before there has been I watched a

59:49

planning uh zoning I mean the Planning

59:51

Commission hearings and some of the

59:53

people in the area of Bo Street were not

59:55

happy with with this um so can you just

59:57

share with myself the colleagues and the

1:00:00

public um some of your uh meetings and

1:00:03

how some of those went absolutely so uh

1:00:06

we began talking to the community in

1:00:08

2023 uh about this project um George

1:00:11

Fernandes is the owner of the land and

1:00:13

that's when the initial kind of idea to

1:00:15

do affordable housing on this parcel

1:00:17

started uh in July of 2023 we had a

1:00:21

community conversation at Harris am Zion

1:00:25

Church where we received a lot of

1:00:27

feedback I think I probably have like

1:00:28

four pages of type notes from different

1:00:31

things of feedback that we we received

1:00:34

uh Mr Fernandez and I took that feedback

1:00:36

and reviewed um and went through um some

1:00:40

of the things that really were of

1:00:42

concern to the neighbors there was a lot

1:00:43

of things that were concerning to the

1:00:45

neighbors that were brought up and

1:00:46

things that I also have concerns about

1:00:48

you know the crime in the area the lack

1:00:51

of lighting the issues with the trees

1:00:53

needing trimmed the issues with parking

1:00:56

and boas being two ways but and access

1:01:00

by fire company and things like that

1:01:02

there's all of those concerns and we we

1:01:04

really comb through those concerns and

1:01:06

identified some things that we could do

1:01:09

in the design of this project to allay

1:01:12

some of those concerns so initially in

1:01:15

the July meeting in 2023 so that was two

1:01:19

years ago now um in July of 2023 in that

1:01:23

initial design we had um commercial

1:01:25

space in the first floor we asked a

1:01:27

daycare and a potential Pharmacy in that

1:01:30

area um two things that aren't

1:01:32

necessarily within walking distance of

1:01:34

this community from the community

1:01:36

feedback the concern was that that would

1:01:38

cause increased traffic um different

1:01:40

people coming in that don't necessarily

1:01:42

live in the neighborhood to go to the

1:01:43

pharmacy to drop kids off at the daycare

1:01:46

uh so we went back to our um our

1:01:48

designers and asked them to remove that

1:01:51

and um from the design we removed that

1:01:54

we went out on um July 31st after that

1:01:57

July 6th meeting we got um some

1:02:00

neighbors who would be interested in

1:02:02

additional conversations July 31st we

1:02:04

met here at City Hall with several of

1:02:06

those neighbors who were interested in

1:02:08

continuing that conversation and

1:02:10

presented that um the updated design

1:02:13

several of the neighbors were very happy

1:02:15

with that there were one or two that

1:02:16

still were not that that was not what

1:02:20

they were interested in seeing on this

1:02:22

parcel um in August at the end of August

1:02:26

of 2023 we also went to one of the

1:02:29

neighbors homes and they invited several

1:02:31

other neighbors over and we again talked

1:02:33

about the different design and the

1:02:35

things that we had done and the things

1:02:37

we heard um and ways that we could

1:02:39

potentially partner with the community

1:02:42

to bring some of the things that they

1:02:43

need in their Community um after that on

1:02:47

October 10th of 2023 before we came here

1:02:50

for planning board hearing we went out

1:02:53

um and knocked on doors and left door

1:02:56

hangers on several residents around the

1:02:58

property just saying we're going to City

1:03:00

Hall we're going to you know the land

1:03:02

the planning board do you have any

1:03:04

questions what things you know to try to

1:03:07

catch some of those people who maybe

1:03:08

didn't come to the community meeting and

1:03:10

weren't available um for those follow-up

1:03:13

meetings we came to the planning board

1:03:15

again in November 1st

1:03:17

2023 and one neighbor was in attendance

1:03:20

at that that planning hearing and was in

1:03:22

support of the project um

1:03:26

then we didn't do very well we did a

1:03:29

whole lot behind the scenes not very

1:03:31

much in the community's eyes but we

1:03:33

applied for a low-income housing tax

1:03:34

credits for the property we were awarded

1:03:37

the low-income housing tax credits as

1:03:39

well as Innovation and design and

1:03:41

construction for the project from phfa

1:03:45

so we came back here on November 6 of

1:03:48

2024 um to present this land development

1:03:51

plan because now we're at that point um

1:03:55

and there were three neighbors who

1:03:56

showed up that were not in support of

1:03:58

the project they want the lot to remain

1:04:00

open as an open area um and those three

1:04:04

neighbors were here um after that

1:04:07

meeting um you know we had the holidays

1:04:09

and everything in between there but just

1:04:11

last Friday we hosted a community

1:04:13

meeting again at Bethesda Mission and I

1:04:15

had sent um all the me or yeah I sent

1:04:19

Council all of the the invitation I

1:04:21

apologize again for that my goal was get

1:04:24

everything out to the community and

1:04:25

completely forgot to invite everyone

1:04:27

else so I do apologize for that but um

1:04:30

at that meeting that we had on the 17th

1:04:33

we had one individual show up who grew

1:04:35

up in that neighborhood and um stated

1:04:38

that he was in support of that project

1:04:40

after our was or wasn't was is yes and

1:04:43

that gentleman's here today so um I'll

1:04:46

let him speak for himself on that um

1:04:48

since our conversation today and since

1:04:51

really just getting ready for this I

1:04:53

reached out to one of the neighbors and

1:04:55

just asked her if I could use her name

1:04:56

and and if she still is in support of

1:04:58

the project she is in fact still in

1:05:00

support of the project and she's okay

1:05:02

with me saying that her name is Nicole

1:05:04

and she was at the initial meeting and

1:05:06

she is still in support of the project

1:05:07

she is a stakeholder in that Community

1:05:10

yes and and you know what she's been a

1:05:12

she's been an asset to me in that she'll

1:05:15

call me and let me know if there's

1:05:16

things in that lot that need cleaned up

1:05:18

she's I mean you can't ask for a better

1:05:20

neighbor somebody who keeps an eye out

1:05:22

on your property you know so I I really

1:05:25

appreciate apprciate that she's she is

1:05:27

that Vigilant in her community and I

1:05:29

commend her for that so um she still is

1:05:32

in she still is in agreement with the

1:05:34

project and um had said that it was okay

1:05:37

for me to use her name today so that's

1:05:38

kind of what we've been doing with the

1:05:41

community I I intend to continue to keep

1:05:43

updating the community and to keep a

1:05:45

running list of anybody who wants

1:05:47

updates on the project um because I feel

1:05:50

like sometimes I'm like constantly say

1:05:52

okay you know sending out mailers and

1:05:54

and and feelers I just you know I don't

1:05:56

want to give anybody information they

1:05:57

don't want or that irritates them so um

1:06:00

you know definitely open to keeping the

1:06:02

conversation open and how we can be a

1:06:04

good neighbor in that Community yeah um

1:06:07

and I think that's um essential um in

1:06:10

situations like this um that

1:06:12

neighborhood as I told you I don't live

1:06:13

far from the proximity I also grew up in

1:06:15

that neighborhood also went to Woodward

1:06:18

was a W Woodward Busy B uh um but uh I

1:06:23

just want to make sure that we're we're

1:06:25

keeping that open line of communication

1:06:26

with the community because there were

1:06:28

several attempts to bring businesses and

1:06:30

things of that nature inside of that

1:06:32

community and they will stand up and say

1:06:35

hey we do not want this which is

1:06:37

appreciative um and our verses their

1:06:39

voices are the loudest for me as I

1:06:41

shareed with you that's who I work for

1:06:43

so I want to make sure that we are

1:06:45

representing them in the most uh proper

1:06:47

way that we can um because some of of

1:06:50

the things as we discussed just to share

1:06:52

some of my sentiments of what this looks

1:06:55

like in in in our communities so many

1:06:57

times we hear low in lowincome housing

1:07:00

and affordable housing we just want to

1:07:02

make sure that we're defining that in a

1:07:04

proper manner uh cuz some of the things

1:07:06

that we have are building where there's

1:07:08

a lot of reconstruction our construction

1:07:10

going on in in our communities and we

1:07:12

just don't want another Governor Square

1:07:14

to happen on on our watch we want to

1:07:16

make sure that these these places are

1:07:18

being taken care of so some of the

1:07:20

things inside of this resolution um that

1:07:23

maybe haven't specifically been

1:07:24

addressed I'm looking at um I know we're

1:07:27

not there yet building but making sure

1:07:29

that there are um good SEC uh security

1:07:33

cameras um great lighting um U making

1:07:36

sure with the aberus that you you know

1:07:38

the proper trees are being planted so

1:07:40

there is still visibility in that

1:07:42

neighborhood um and just um to to to

1:07:47

speed this up a little bit just show

1:07:48

some of the the positives that will

1:07:51

incur that will happen in this community

1:07:54

um of course this getting back on the

1:07:56

tax road for our city is always a good

1:07:58

thing um because we definitely need it

1:08:02

uh um and also um beautifying that

1:08:05

neighborhood um the the parking as you

1:08:07

mentioned is very minimal there um

1:08:11

hopefully at some point we can do some

1:08:13

traffic studies in that whole area I

1:08:15

would love to see one way going down

1:08:17

boats one way going up Briggs another

1:08:19

way so hopefully at some point we can

1:08:20

get to that to to minimize some of the

1:08:23

traffic there um of the confusion

1:08:25

uh with the traffic anyway and the the

1:08:29

economic value that it will bring I

1:08:30

think you said this is like a218 million

1:08:33

project yes sir it's an $18 million

1:08:36

project 13 million of that is towards

1:08:38

construction and I'm working very

1:08:39

closely with our our construction

1:08:41

company to make sure that we are not

1:08:45

only advertising bids in the city for

1:08:48

City residents who are trades people but

1:08:50

going above and beyond to ensure that

1:08:52

we're making sure that City trades folks

1:08:54

know that that they should be applying

1:08:56

when this bid comes out and to please

1:08:58

let me know if there's any barriers to

1:09:00

that because it's important that this

1:09:03

investment not only goes into the

1:09:05

building but goes into the City and

1:09:07

that's that's what we're looking for and

1:09:09

I'm glad you guys are saying this uh

1:09:11

because we you know we we're not

1:09:13

twisting arms here but you know um one

1:09:15

of my passions to ensure that our uh

1:09:19

local contractors are Harrisburg based

1:09:21

contractors let me stay away from that

1:09:23

word Harrisburg based cont contractors

1:09:25

are being included in the economic

1:09:28

growth of our city so I think this will

1:09:30

be uh beneficial to uh people and if you

1:09:33

do need any assistance with some of

1:09:35

those vendors plumbers electricians

1:09:37

painters roofers or anything like that

1:09:39

outside of the list that you may have um

1:09:42

I actually also know some of those

1:09:44

contractors and will be great to share

1:09:46

that information with you so that

1:09:47

everyone at least has an opportunity to

1:09:51

uh apply so um for me again just can you

1:09:54

talk about the e ecomic impact and

1:09:56

that'll be my last

1:09:58

question yeah so the economic impact we

1:10:00

talked about it being over $18 million

1:10:03

um the whole development budget for this

1:10:05

project is over $18 million uh we

1:10:08

currently only have a

1:10:09

$400,000 gap which seems huge but when

1:10:12

you look at 18 million it's really not

1:10:14

gigantic so uh we did put in a $100,000

1:10:18

request for local share funding through

1:10:19

the county which is gaming dollars we

1:10:22

will not be coming to the city to ask

1:10:23

for home funds we are Max out through

1:10:26

State home funds however I will be

1:10:28

coming to the city to talk about

1:10:30

potential joint applications for a local

1:10:32

share on the state side as well as any

1:10:35

other potential grant opportunities or

1:10:37

funding opportunities we have to fill

1:10:39

that gap of

1:10:40

400,000 um the there is a 12 or 13

1:10:44

million doll um construction budget and

1:10:48

again we're looking to hopefully fill

1:10:49

that with as many local trade folks that

1:10:52

can put in a bid now putting in a bid

1:10:54

you have to all kinds of paperwork and

1:10:56

insurances and things like that but a

1:10:58

lot of these local trades people already

1:11:00

know how to do that or if not they've

1:11:02

been in contact with um some of our

1:11:05

folks in the city who help trades folks

1:11:07

to be able to do that um additionally

1:11:09

we'll be creating I can't remember how

1:11:11

many

1:11:12

jobs 45 I think

1:11:16

it's four to five permanent positions

1:11:18

with maintenance property management and

1:11:20

supportive services and then 40 plus

1:11:24

trades jobs on the site so um that's our

1:11:28

overall economic impact and then my hope

1:11:30

is that we'll be able to not only

1:11:32

sustain the property in the condition

1:11:34

that it's built in but continue to

1:11:37

enhance you know the offerings from this

1:11:39

property and continue to work with our

1:11:41

neighbors at in the Woodward area to be

1:11:44

able to increase the economic impact

1:11:48

across thank you um no further questions

1:11:51

thank you uh councilwoman

1:11:53

Daniels thank you

1:11:56

councilman thank you madam chair uh

1:11:59

thank you Dr berelli and team for being

1:12:01

here this evening um what's the

1:12:02

completion date for the project so we

1:12:05

anticipate closing with phfa in June or

1:12:08

July of this year 25 um and beginning

1:12:12

construction August September maybe

1:12:14

October 2025 and this is if everything

1:12:17

goes as I planed which never happens um

1:12:20

and then we anticipate about 12 to 18

1:12:24

months of construction I'm hoping closer

1:12:27

to 12 we're using um blueprint Robotics

1:12:30

and a mass Timber design so that means

1:12:32

basically a lot of the project would be

1:12:35

assembled in a factory and then the

1:12:37

parcels are like shipped to us and then

1:12:40

put up by local trades um so hopefully

1:12:42

that will speed up our process a little

1:12:44

bit but so I would anticipate 20 end of

1:12:47

2026 being able to begin occupancy if

1:12:51

not early 20 awesome thank you and then

1:12:54

the Latino connection Foundation is that

1:12:56

separate from just Latino connection is

1:12:59

that the 501c3 it is so we have thank

1:13:01

you for asking that uh we have started

1:13:03

George invested in um Latino connection

1:13:07

Foundation we call it lcf just to keep

1:13:10

confusion and people from being confused

1:13:12

um but Latino connection Foundation or

1:13:13

ltf is a completely independent uh 501c3

1:13:17

Georgia's initial investment started the

1:13:20

pro the foundation but we are now um in

1:13:24

an effective March 1st will be

1:13:26

completely um independent with our own

1:13:29

operating funds and we do um a lot of

1:13:32

the work that Latino connection did that

1:13:34

was really Grant funded or really meant

1:13:36

as like Community Based type of thing

1:13:38

we've taken over some of that uh we also

1:13:41

do some Early Education informational

1:13:43

things for parents just getting

1:13:45

information out there on things you can

1:13:46

do with your kids to get them ready for

1:13:49

kindergarten and um some different types

1:13:51

of Health outreaches um and we are we

1:13:54

current have an application into phfa to

1:13:57

begin doing bilingual housing counseling

1:13:59

so of Spanish speaking housing

1:14:00

counselers so this would be the first

1:14:02

project under that uh this is the the

1:14:06

this project and Sycamore homes okay is

1:14:09

part we're we're partnering with FES

1:14:11

realy affordable homes to bring Sycamore

1:14:13

homes um as the nonprofit on that on

1:14:17

that um project qualify the phfa so we

1:14:20

qualify for the home funding yes and

1:14:22

that's what really got us started and

1:14:23

then I mean really being able to

1:14:25

separate it out has helped us to um keep

1:14:29

the lcf very Mission J you speak you

1:14:32

spoke on the siore homes and if you're

1:14:34

not at Liberty to speak on it I

1:14:35

completely understand what was the

1:14:37

holdup or what is the holdup on that

1:14:39

specific project so syamore hommes

1:14:42

should be completed in February March of

1:14:45

this year okay we have had a lot of

1:14:48

delays we have had a lot of delay in

1:14:50

funding receiving the funding for the

1:14:51

project we've had a lot of delays in

1:14:53

construction um um I think we are at the

1:14:56

end of a lot of that um we received um

1:15:00

home funding from the county we have not

1:15:03

received any funds from the city which

1:15:05

is really the cdbg funding I believe was

1:15:08

held up and I know you have some

1:15:09

Champions here on Council that wants to

1:15:11

see that move forward so I'm pretty sure

1:15:13

I speak for the body any help we could

1:15:15

offer please let us know um yeah we

1:15:17

definitely I mean we still have a

1:15:18

funding Gap George has eaten a lot of

1:15:20

the fing Gap spoke with Mr Fernandez he

1:15:22

has eaten a lot of the funding gap for

1:15:23

Sycamore homes so those 23 units we can

1:15:26

really thank him for yes otherwise that

1:15:29

project would not have come to the point

1:15:31

that it's at okay um so we anticipate

1:15:34

again opening end of February beginning

1:15:36

of March I would have said February if

1:15:38

not for two weeks ago I was told

1:15:39

Shindler elevator has some some work

1:15:42

issues Manpower issues but it's close to

1:15:44

completion but we are very close please

1:15:47

reach out if you'd like to tour it

1:15:48

before completion love to give you a

1:15:50

tour of it 23 single occupancy units

1:15:54

really excited because those are really

1:15:55

going to help with some of our homeless

1:15:57

population who are taking up some of

1:15:59

that space in shelter or transitional

1:16:00

housing because they can't find anything

1:16:02

affordable outside of there absolutely

1:16:04

this will help to bridge that Gap now um

1:16:06

I fortunately was on some of the walks

1:16:09

in the neighborhood with Mr Fernandez

1:16:11

and spoke with some of the residents and

1:16:13

assisted with some of the tree Cuts one

1:16:15

of the things that the residents in that

1:16:16

area agreed on with Mr Fernandez was a

1:16:19

substation in the building is that still

1:16:21

in the plan somehow some way we still

1:16:23

have space yep cuz I know that was like

1:16:25

one of the main priorities out there

1:16:28

whenever they want to be absolutely I

1:16:30

know Harrisburg Police Department agreed

1:16:32

on it I think we were waiting on the

1:16:34

actual developers which would be your

1:16:35

team is that something you guys would

1:16:37

still consider putting in there for

1:16:39

safety because I think that was one of

1:16:40

the main draws for the residents so that

1:16:42

would be amazing to see Y and regardless

1:16:44

we have the space designated for them if

1:16:46

they use it great if not then we just

1:16:48

have an extra room with and I'm pretty

1:16:50

sure our chair of Public Safety we could

1:16:52

uh connect with him and make sure work

1:16:55

guard you definitely come in and use

1:16:57

that office space if you'd like but I I

1:16:59

just think you know we can send people a

1:17:00

Giants I know we can send people you

1:17:02

know to this development and ensure that

1:17:04

Community safe just like on 13th Street

1:17:06

near Double D's with that substation sit

1:17:08

so 15th you know right off of 15th and

1:17:11

then um one thing I wanted to and I'm

1:17:13

pretty sure you're privy to the

1:17:14

information when we dealing with the

1:17:15

senior population a lot of them have

1:17:18

service animals yeah some of their

1:17:20

service animals have different state

1:17:21

requirements than just normal dogs um so

1:17:24

someone has a staffshire or American

1:17:26

Pitbull Terrier has a service dog that

1:17:29

may be a different legal kind of you

1:17:32

know murky water there so I just wanted

1:17:33

to give you a heads up for that because

1:17:35

I know service dogs don't require like

1:17:37

City registration and things of that

1:17:39

nature so that may if

1:17:41

if yeah yeah but if a service dog would

1:17:43

be different legally so would they be

1:17:45

allowed to have their service animal if

1:17:48

it's done professionally if it's an

1:17:50

actual service animal and not the

1:17:52

emotional support animal then abs

1:17:54

absolutely that's never an issue and and

1:17:58

should never be and if it ever is an

1:17:59

issue I mean everyone has my cell phone

1:18:02

number just call me okay I just wanted

1:18:03

to make sure because I've come across

1:18:05

that a few times and try service animal

1:18:08

now the emotional support animals are

1:18:09

kind of a little bit of different story

1:18:11

um we just want to make sure that if

1:18:13

it's a service animal that's of a large

1:18:15

size that that animal is trained trained

1:18:17

you of course you don't want the

1:18:17

facility getting beat up or Tor up and I

1:18:20

don't want anybody I don't want to get

1:18:21

you know so just making sure that the

1:18:23

service animals me along the lines of

1:18:25

everything being done correctly would

1:18:27

that be respected and tolerated okay

1:18:29

absolutely not only respected it I mean

1:18:31

that's a right per the disability has

1:18:34

awesome we will never you know okay

1:18:37

thank you Dr brell um I have no further

1:18:38

questions Madam chair thank you uh

1:18:41

councilwoman Ross thank you councilwoman

1:18:44

Daniels and thank you both for being

1:18:45

here this evening um you gave a a great

1:18:48

explanation on the project um I really

1:18:51

appreciate you reaching out to the

1:18:52

community not once twice but multiple

1:18:55

times um they are very vocal um within

1:18:58

that Community I do remember our first

1:18:59

meeting and they had even asked about

1:19:01

why not having um house houses that we

1:19:05

could purchase our row homes and we went

1:19:08

through the whole process and got to

1:19:10

where we are now with the model you're

1:19:11

showing us and the updates and

1:19:13

improvements that you made uh with the

1:19:16

community's input so I just really had

1:19:18

that comment of just saying you know

1:19:20

thank you for doing your diligence on

1:19:22

that part and continue to um speak with

1:19:25

them and also uh make the changes that

1:19:28

they recommended so coming together with

1:19:29

a compromise so I just wanted to say

1:19:31

thank you thank

1:19:36

you that's it for me president pow thank

1:19:39

you um I I have some comments I guess

1:19:43

and then some questions so I'm I'm glad

1:19:45

to hear about the community outreach

1:19:48

because I did attend the July 2023

1:19:51

meeting at Harris am zign Church um so I

1:19:55

heard um the neighbors and other

1:20:00

community members that were present um

1:20:02

some of the things that they were

1:20:03

looking for um in this

1:20:06

project

1:20:08

um

1:20:10

I still have some concerns about

1:20:13

lighting I know um there is a Landscape

1:20:16

and Lighting plan but um I've received

1:20:20

numerous phone calls from these same

1:20:22

neighbors um related to the lack of

1:20:26

lighting in the area so I just wanted to

1:20:28

know um how do you intend to address

1:20:31

this issue and not just spill over

1:20:34

lighting as it's noted here

1:20:41

um there will be no light spill over

1:20:45

onto the properties to the Northwest and

1:20:47

east of the project

1:20:50

site so I just wanted to to inquire

1:20:54

about that

1:20:55

and then my second question is if you

1:20:57

could please move this rendering onto

1:21:00

the easel so that everyone can see it I

1:21:05

I vaguely remember um the rendering for

1:21:09

Sycamore but is will this look similar I

1:21:13

think Sycamore is built up but can you

1:21:15

share the description or the difference

1:21:18

between the two

1:21:20

renderings Woodward Woodward first

1:21:24

condition

1:21:25

no I'm clear on the first rendition I'm

1:21:27

well aware of that but Sycamore and

1:21:29

Woodward just for if anybody cannot see

1:21:35

this you want us to describe the picture

1:21:37

or the difference so the difference is

1:21:39

the difference is I thought I was clear

1:21:41

the differences between the two

1:21:42

renderings it's been a while since we've

1:21:44

seen Sycamore it's not completed yet and

1:21:47

now we're just seeing what this could be

1:21:50

so can you please describe the

1:21:52

differences or similarities if there are

1:21:54

any thank absolutely the difference is

1:21:56

between this is very different from

1:21:58

syamore syamore is only 2 units it's

1:22:00

very single OCC um and that one was

1:22:04

designed by

1:22:08

um it was designed by a different

1:22:11

architect group um this is designed by K

1:22:14

it is uh the mass Timber we also have uh

1:22:19

the brick front a little bit of brick

1:22:21

and the vinyl on the front as well as

1:22:23

some big windows we also have a patio on

1:22:26

the fourth floor um overview it has a

1:22:32

community room um and it has one and two

1:22:35

bedroom units not just single

1:22:38

that's uh we're also working with a

1:22:41

different general contractor Sycamore

1:22:43

homes was uh affordable housing but it

1:22:46

wasn't a low-income housing tax credit

1:22:48

project so it was very different in

1:22:52

regards to the process to come from

1:22:54

design when we were working with

1:22:56

Warehouse

1:22:57

with the name I knew it was in there

1:22:59

somewhere when we were working with

1:23:01

Warehouse it was very different design

1:23:04

process than the design process that

1:23:06

goes in for the low income housing tax

1:23:08

property so um it's it's a lot of um

1:23:13

what you see here is really what we

1:23:15

intend to build it's not going to differ

1:23:18

very much from the drawing uh once it's

1:23:21

built where Sycamore kind of differed a

1:23:23

little bit sche a little bit in the type

1:23:26

of materials that were used on the

1:23:28

outside as part of our value

1:23:30

engineering um that occurred even before

1:23:33

I was brought on Foundation brought

1:23:36

on

1:23:39

Fernand so that is some of the

1:23:41

differences I don't know if that

1:23:44

helps that's sufficient thank you I

1:23:49

apologize okay now how about the

1:23:52

lighting as far as the lighting is

1:23:54

concerned

1:23:55

uh the lighting's been designed I'm

1:23:57

switch mics the lighting has been

1:23:59

designed to meet um General Industry

1:24:02

standards for minimum and maximum

1:24:03

lighting for a parking lot for

1:24:05

residential use um I don't have a copy

1:24:07

of the lighting plan with me but we're

1:24:09

going to use a combination of typical

1:24:11

LED pole lights um to to light up the

1:24:15

back parking lot um there will be

1:24:18

lighting incorporated into the building

1:24:19

as far as maybe some architectural

1:24:21

accent lighting but nothing there to

1:24:22

highlight or um um we'll say add like

1:24:27

additional Street lighting along 18th

1:24:28

boas or her street we've also um spend

1:24:32

some time to look at what our U our

1:24:35

dumpster enclosure looks like because

1:24:36

that'll be enclosed by a white privacy

1:24:38

fence the whole way around and then

1:24:39

Gates out front so there's some concerns

1:24:41

about security there so we do have a

1:24:42

separate pull light it'll match what's

1:24:44

going on in the parking lot back there

1:24:47

and then inside the dog park area we've

1:24:49

used a smaller it's a 10 foot high

1:24:51

pedestrian style light to light the dog

1:24:54

Park up but the goal being and you

1:24:57

referenced spillover the zoning

1:24:58

ordinance is very clear about what we

1:25:00

can and can't do with lighting uh spill

1:25:02

over onto the neighboring property so

1:25:04

the lighting has to be set up not only

1:25:06

to light up our parking lot very well

1:25:08

but also not spill over and create what

1:25:11

they call light trespass for the

1:25:12

residents next door and we have met that

1:25:14

requirement no I understand that but I

1:25:17

was speaking to Lighting on the adjacent

1:25:21

streets but that but if you could share

1:25:23

the plan I'm just just curious outside

1:25:26

of the pole and whatever lighting for

1:25:29

the dog park or for um

1:25:32

your um dumpster receptacle if you could

1:25:36

share it I would like to review it CU

1:25:39

that that is a concern I'm not sure that

1:25:41

the building design is at that point yet

1:25:44

with with that and we haven't been and

1:25:46

have not coordinated with City on

1:25:48

upgrades standing the street lighting

1:25:50

either that hasn't been asked of us up

1:25:52

until this convers now right

1:25:55

okay okay well thank I don't have any

1:25:59

other questions certainly something we'd

1:26:00

be happy to consider with some input and

1:26:03

feedback from from the city please thank

1:26:08

you okay thank you um vice president

1:26:11

green thank you councilman Daniels um I

1:26:14

don't have many questions for you most

1:26:15

of mine have uh kind of already been

1:26:17

discussed at this point um I do

1:26:19

appreciate you guys reaching out to the

1:26:21

neighbors continuously uh I do know this

1:26:22

is a very active Community uh some of

1:26:24

other projects um I was on Planning

1:26:26

Commission when it came before uh and

1:26:28

the community was very very involved and

1:26:31

wanted to be part of the process so I

1:26:33

would ask even as you move forward if

1:26:35

that does happen um that you continue to

1:26:37

involve the community and not just like

1:26:38

get that approval and say well we've got

1:26:40

what we need you know no need in

1:26:42

continuing in talking to you um which

1:26:43

unfortunately does happen sometimes so I

1:26:45

look forward to you continuing to work

1:26:47

with the community to make sure this is

1:26:48

actually integrated into the

1:26:50

neighborhood and not just a project that

1:26:51

sits there um and is not a part of the

1:26:53

community itself

1:26:56

that's all I

1:26:57

have thank you um Davis thank you

1:27:02

councilwoman Daniels okay so sounds like

1:27:06

there's been some ongoing history here I

1:27:08

haven't attended any of those meetings I

1:27:11

actually live on the other side of uh

1:27:13

State Street but did I hear you say this

1:27:16

is a senior affordable housing or so is

1:27:21

there an age limit for the residents

1:27:25

that can 62 plus okay and there going to

1:27:30

be 48

1:27:31

units will there be 48 parking spaces or

1:27:35

there's 47 parking 47 okay there were 48

1:27:43

Park that of our of

1:27:50

okay i' like to see that area developed

1:27:54

I mean just to block up the street

1:27:56

there's a gas station that's being

1:27:59

revitalized right now so that would also

1:28:02

look nice um there with that whole

1:28:06

project um yeah I'd like to see

1:28:08

it up and running here 48 units of

1:28:12

senior housing as long as it's safe it's

1:28:15

well lit and again that the

1:28:18

community is continuously

1:28:21

engaged yeah I like it thank thank you I

1:28:24

have any

1:28:31

questions I think that does anyone have

1:28:34

any last minute

1:28:36

questions

1:28:38

no thank you um so let's just go ahead

1:28:41

and add this to the next legislative

1:28:43

session thank you to um the

1:28:45

administrative staff and to the

1:28:46

applicants and that's that concludes the

1:28:49

business for tonight's community and

1:28:51

economic development committee thank you

1:28:54

thank you thank you we will now move

1:28:56

forward with our meeting agenda um next

1:29:01

we have public comment just a few

1:29:03

housekeeping notes before we begin

1:29:06

please state your name and your address

1:29:08

for the meeting record if you don't feel

1:29:10

comfortable sharing your address please

1:29:12

share the vicinity in which you live

1:29:14

within the city you'll have four minutes

1:29:16

to share your comments Mr trusdale will

1:29:20

serve as our timekeeper and I'll begin

1:29:23

to my right is is there anyone that

1:29:24

would like to offer public

1:29:27

comment okay seeing and hearing no one

1:29:30

anyone in the middle

1:29:46

section good

1:29:47

evening hello my name is chery Hughes

1:29:51

I've been a resident of the city for 53

1:29:53

years

1:29:55

my reasons for being here tonight I

1:29:58

thought my meeting was going to be part

1:30:01

of with the

1:30:03

mayor which uh I have a lot of issues

1:30:07

right now because she promised me some

1:30:11

things while my son was alive that never

1:30:14

took place she asked me to come to her

1:30:17

with a plan first I want to say my son

1:30:20

sh my son is Hugh

1:30:32

but um my baby boy isar

1:30:35

Hughes I had numerous conversations well

1:30:39

not numerous of conversations because

1:30:41

she only responded to one I had uh

1:30:45

meetings with the

1:30:47

mayor in

1:30:49

2022 when the incident first happened

1:30:52

with them shoo at my baby boy she asked

1:30:56

me to come to her with a

1:31:00

plan I

1:31:15

present one second I do

1:31:19

apologies but she asked me to come to

1:31:21

her with a plan

1:31:24

she will help

1:31:31

me so much going on Miss Hugh just for

1:31:34

your time so you don't run out of time

1:31:36

if you wanted to get out like the

1:31:38

premise and then okay she asked me to

1:31:41

come to her with a

1:31:42

plan I came to her with this

1:31:45

plan she told me she was going help and

1:31:48

I came back to her with a plan

1:31:54

she said she wasn't

1:31:57

there so the plan was for me to find a

1:32:02

relocation Mr Trel can pass it out while

1:32:05

you continue speaking and as you

1:32:10

see this was the plan this was the

1:32:14

situation why she told me to come with

1:32:16

the plan

1:32:18

because

1:32:20

uh it was

1:32:22

like my was being threatened on the

1:32:25

internet and I presented the two threats

1:32:27

to her it's part of the

1:32:30

plan so come to her with a

1:32:33

plan

1:32:36

so she can help me which I came to her

1:32:40

with my

1:32:42

plan when I came to her with my plan Co

1:32:47

head wasn't nobody in the

1:32:50

building then the building was under

1:32:52

construction

1:32:55

she was working from

1:32:56

home then it

1:32:59

was I want to say Memorial's Day that's

1:33:01

the first holiday right for the summer

1:33:04

Memorial's Day it's like two or three

1:33:07

days before aar's birthday because his

1:33:09

birthday is made

1:33:11

28 so I come to her when she got the

1:33:14

food vending trucks out there out front

1:33:16

of

1:33:19

here wave me off

1:33:24

man I forget the officer's name he said

1:33:26

he was going to take my number what she

1:33:29

has my

1:33:30

number and they was going to get back to

1:33:33

me it's

1:33:36

2025 my son is dead

1:33:39

now she promised

1:33:41

me she promised

1:33:45

us to help me I presented the

1:33:49

plan she tried Miss Tiffany her

1:33:53

secretary there I have left numerous of

1:33:56

messages Miss Hughes thank you for your

1:33:58

time at the end of the meeting maybe you

1:34:00

can meet with a council member to

1:34:01

discuss a can I get five more minutes

1:34:03

please because I need this to be on

1:34:04

record

1:34:06

please Miss

1:34:08

Tiffany I have calls I have text I have

1:34:11

it all in my phone no respond her other

1:34:15

secretary can tell you how many times

1:34:18

I've been in that building the seat of

1:34:20

Mayor how many times I have called how

1:34:24

many times am I recorded on the camera

1:34:26

coming in this building how many

1:34:29

times now my son's dead still no answer

1:34:33

from the mayor I had one meeting with

1:34:35

the mayor since my son's been deceased

1:34:37

and that was July the 5th or the 6th I

1:34:40

can't remember right now but mind y'all

1:34:42

she got ran over Fourth of July 9th the

1:34:46

same night my son got killed now once

1:34:48

did she make a news conference about my

1:34:51

son it was all about her

1:34:54

was all about her my son is dead on the

1:34:58

streets she does she did nothing for me

1:35:00

where's my help I still need this help

1:35:02

where she at cuz my my life ain't safe

1:35:05

here my grandson's being threatened now

1:35:07

it's just a lot still going on and they

1:35:09

noce about me that I went for as the

1:35:12

governor

1:35:13

Josh Patty Kim came

1:35:16

out listen

1:35:19

to thank

1:35:21

you thank you

1:35:25

is there anybody else in the middle

1:35:27

section that would like to offer a

1:35:28

public

1:35:29

comment yes I'm s

1:35:33

okay also I would like y'all to know

1:35:36

that Mr Rodriguez and Miss Amber is

1:35:40

working on a petition for my son as we

1:35:42

speak and I appreciate

1:35:45

y'all and if I could get

1:35:48

y'all signature on it I will greatly

1:35:51

appreciate it because this ain't my

1:35:52

first son

1:35:54

get to these streets I got one in Hall

1:35:56

Manor de I got one on 14th in Swat now I

1:36:00

got one in Midtown I got no answers

1:36:03

three dead sons and three death

1:36:05

certificates no

1:36:08

answers as a mother for real where's my

1:36:12

answers like I told y'all before they

1:36:15

got answers for theirs which is their

1:36:17

Ken folks these are my

1:36:20

babies as a mother

1:36:25

what I'm supposed to do I done been

1:36:28

everywhere ain't nobody listening to me

1:36:30

but detective Richard aini you hear me

1:36:34

working all three of my son cases right

1:36:35

now because I got no justice and I've

1:36:38

been doing this every since

1:36:40

91314 they killed my oldest son

1:36:43

91314 they killed my second son Mother's

1:36:47

Day May 1015 that's what I deserve as a

1:36:50

mother now they just killed my baby on

1:36:53

four July I don't got no more Sons no

1:36:56

more what I'm supposed to do as a mother

1:36:59

she promised me something the mayor Miss

1:37:02

Wanda Williams and I'm still waiting for

1:37:05

that promise now how do we resolve this

1:37:07

or how do I get in the meeting and get

1:37:09

my answers please and thank you I'm

1:37:12

hurting as a mother I don't have no more

1:37:14

baby

1:37:17

boys and I still owe on my son's body I

1:37:21

still owe on my son's body

1:37:24

who's B this who's helping

1:37:33

me son had a future he had a future just

1:37:40

graduated forgot one thing forgot one

1:37:44

thing I need y to

1:37:46

see just one thing I need yall to see my

1:37:49

son didn't get to walk that

1:37:52

stage I to do that y'all hear me y'all

1:37:56

see what it

1:37:57

say you did it baby fly

1:38:00

high do y know me as a mother I have to

1:38:06

go understand I want y to feel yall

1:38:11

understand me as a mother this lady

1:38:13

promised me something our

1:38:15

mayor promised me something my son will

1:38:18

be alive if she would came through for

1:38:21

me

1:38:23

through I would still have my son don't

1:38:25

nobody understand that like for real I

1:38:28

would still have my baby if she would

1:38:30

have came through on her promise she

1:38:32

told me to come to with a plan I came

1:38:35

with that plan and my son is dead

1:38:39

now as a

1:38:41

mother as a mother y'all

1:38:45

mothers I'm quite sure y got kids as a

1:38:48

mother I bury all three of my sons with

1:38:51

no an to these up streets out

1:38:57

here so supposed to

1:39:00

do I keep crying out what I'm supposed

1:39:02

to

1:39:04

do what am I supposed to do please tell

1:39:15

me Miss if you wouldn't mind waiting

1:39:18

we're almost finished and hopefully we

1:39:21

can get you someone to speak with I

1:39:24

don't know if the business administrator

1:39:26

would be available to speak or not but

1:39:28

if you could just wait a couple minutes

1:39:30

thank you thank you is there anyone to

1:39:33

my left that would like to offer public

1:39:35

comment seeing and hearing no one the

1:39:38

time is 711 p.m. I will entertain a

1:39:42

motion to adjourn so moveed is there a

1:39:45

second second thank you we stand a

1:39:52

journ for

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.