Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg Planning Commission - September 4th 2024

3:02:211,149 summary words · ~6 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The Harrisburg Planning Commission tabled two controversial supportive housing proposals (a youth facility on Front Street and a large veteran housing village on South Front Street) due to lack of neighborhood engagement and a major dispute over the relocation of the Capital Area Green Belt. Conversely, they approved a downtown historic office conversion at 112 Market Street into 48 apartments, conditionally mandating first-floor retail preservation to prevent deactivating the streetscape.

This meeting highlights the intense local tensions between advancing much-needed transitional and supportive housing for vulnerable populations (homeless youth and veterans) and preserving critical municipal infrastructure, community safety, and public recreational spaces like the Capital Area Green Belt.

Section summaries

0:00-4:34

Supportive Youth Housing Special Exception (2743 N. Front St.)

watch

Planning Bureau staff present a special exception request to establish a supportive housing facility for eight youth (ages 10-21) at 2743 North Front Street. The neoclassical building's historical integrity is detailed, and the staff recommends approval with licensing conditions. Developer David Keas explains the mission to partner with Thrive Housing Services for homeless youth.

Essential for understanding the commission's strict stance on neighborhood notification and the requirements for youth supportive housing.

4:34-18:16

Neighbor Notification Debate & Public Comments

watch

Commissioners criticize the developer for sending notification letters to neighbors only the day before the meeting. Program Director D. Allan explains the Dauphin County youth referral process. Local resident Rebecca Leehart raises concerns about a lack of formal needs assessments and concentrated social issues, prompting the commission to table the application.

Illustrates the critical importance of early neighborhood engagement and needs assessments for local developers.

18:16-22:50

Downtown Office Conversion Proposal (112 Market St.)

optional

The commission reviews a land development plan revision to convert an 8-story historic office building (Veterans Memorial Building) into 48 apartment units. Planning staff recommend approval with conditions including retaining ground-floor commercial space, implementing ADA visitability, and coordinating on safety markings for River Street.

Provides technical details on downtown adaptive reuse and historic preservation.

22:50-36:32

Ground-Floor Retail & Downtown Parking Conundrum

watch

Developer Brad Jones of Harristown discusses the logistics of the conversion. Commissioner McKissick argues passionately against deactivating the ground-floor retail space, warning of a negative precedent for downtown Harrisburg. They also discuss the systemic challenges of downtown parking, including unworkable parking leases with PEDA and high garage rates competing with local residents.

Crucial discussion on the economic realities of downtown revitalization, street-level activation, and systemic parking constraints.

36:32-45:40

Workforce Housing & Conditional Approval of 112 Market St.

optional

Commissioner Ouellet questions the developer's commitment to affordable housing and tax exemptions. Brad Jones clarifies that Harristown is a 501(c)(4) paying full real estate taxes and outlines their existing workforce housing rents. The commission votes to approve the project, conditionally mandating first-floor commercial preservation and ADA accessibility.

Explains developer tax statuses and specific rent structures in Harrisburg.

45:40-59:22

Subdivision of 1103 South Front Street

watch

The commission tackles the preliminary subdivision of a 15-acre vacant steel mill site into two parcels to accommodate separate transitional housing projects. Representatives from the Tunnel to Towers Foundation introduce the plan. Commissioner McKissick immediately raises concerns about preserving the Capital Area Green Belt trail's continuity.

Establishes the geographical and legal groundwork for the massive veteran housing dispute.

59:22-1:08:30

Subdivision Public Comment & Vote

watch

Local citizens and shypoke residents express worry about cumulative density, lack of public dialogue, and potential damage to the Green Belt. Despite these concerns, the commission votes to approve the physical subdivision of the land, acknowledging that the substantive design issues belong in the subsequent land development discussion.

Highlights the tension between high-level subdivision approvals and immediate community anxieties.

1:08:30-1:26:46

Tunnel to Towers Land Development & Green Belt Conflict

watch

The preliminary land development plan is introduced for a veteran housing project featuring 64 apartment units and 20 detached 'Comfort Homes.' Planning Bureau staff insist on Condition 4, which requires the applicant to preserve the Capital Area Green Belt path on-site. Tunnel to Towers representatives strongly object, arguing that public trail access compromises the perimeter security and recovery environment required for traumatized veterans.

This is the core debate of the entire meeting, showing the direct conflict between pedestrian infrastructure and specialized veteran care.

1:26:46-1:54:10

Technical Alternatives & Veteran Housing Logistics

watch

Engineer Betsy Davidson details site grades, and commissioners explore alternative trail designs to bypass the security fence. Lewis Menendez explains the clinical design of 'Comfort Homes' (500 sq ft micro-homes for older veterans) and the main building's support services. VOPA founder Tom Zimmerman shares security challenges they faced with trespassing cyclists.

Deep dive into the operational model of veteran transitional housing and site engineering constraints.

1:54:10-2:58:06

Landowner History, Green Belt Association, and Tabling Vote

watch

Veterans and local advocates voice strong emotional support for the project. Property owner Peggy Grove delivers a lengthy history of the site's private ownership, criticizing the Green Belt's expectations. Green Belt President Doug Hill details the safety hazards of the developer's proposed bypass. City Solicitor Neil Grover explains the legal timeline, prompting the commission to table the plan to force a compromise.

Combines emotional public advocacy, historical context of land ownership, technical trail safety, and the final legal path forward.

Key points

  • Balancing Veteran Security with Public Recreational Access — The core conflict of the Tunnel to Towers Land Development Plan is the security needs of recovering, traumatized veterans versus the public's right-of-way on the Capital Area Green Belt. Tunnel to Towers insists on a secured, fenced perimeter to protect residents from unvetted public traffic, whereas the city and the Green Belt Association warn that pushing the trail off-site forces cyclists and pedestrians into dangerous, active parking lots.
  • Preserving Ground-Floor Commercial Vitality in Downtown Conversions — The commission strongly debated whether to allow 112 Market Street to convert completely to residential. Commissioner McKissick argued that converting ground-floor retail to residential sets a dangerous precedent that deactivates the downtown streetscape, successfully adding a condition to preserve commercial space despite the developer's request for market flexibility.
  • The Pitfall of 'Overnight' Community Engagement — The commission tabled a special exception for a supportive youth housing facility at 2743 North Front Street because the developer sent notification letters to neighbors only the day before the meeting. The commissioners emphasized that successful community integration of social service facilities requires proactive, face-to-face neighbor Q&As rather than last-minute formal notices.
  • Legal Flexibility of Preliminary vs. Final Land Development Plans — City Solicitor Neil Grover clarified that because the Tunnel to Towers application is a preliminary land development plan, the developer has up to one year after initial approval to submit a final plan. This legal mechanism provides a structured buffer for the city, developers, and community advocates to iron out site design ambiguities, property line alignments, and trail easements before construction is locked in.
When you bring veterans together they automatically adjust and they become they fall into their chains of command they hold each other accountable... Linda Cox
We are a military city that has always welcomed us home... don't let this lack of ability to compromise stop this needed project. Ken Stamell

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:15

Harrisburg Planning Commission meeting

0:16

order at approximately

0:19

634 uh Commissioners uh the minutes with

0:24

the August meeting is not

0:26

available we'll move on them in the

0:29

October meeting

0:31

under old business there's

0:33

none under new business this is a

0:36

special exception application for 2743

0:40

North Front Street The Zone Riverfront

0:43

followed by Justin Hershey with First

0:46

Choice Home Buyers this is to establish

0:50

a supporter housing facility on

0:53

site Jeff are they

0:56

here oh could you come up

1:07

okay uh so the applicant is proposing to

1:09

establish a Supportive Housing facility

1:11

use on site uh the proposal requires

1:13

zoning hearing board approval of a

1:15

special exception for the proposed use

1:16

per section

1:18

73057 of the zoning code the property at

1:21

2743 North Front Street is a. 32 acre

1:23

lot featuring a three-story

1:26

4,444 foot structure which was

1:28

constructed circa 1900 the property is

1:30

bounded by the property at 2745 North

1:32

Front Street to the North River Street

1:34

to the east the property at 2721 North

1:36

Front Street to the South and North

1:38

Front Street to the West this attached

1:40

structure features elements of the

1:41

neoclassical and colonial revival

1:42

architectural Styles character

1:44

definining features include the brick

1:46

facade the substantial entrance Portico

1:48

the symmetrical appearance of the main

1:49

building the substantial wooden Corners

1:51

above the second floor featuring dentals

1:53

the metal fire escape on the rear

1:55

elevation the detached garage reflecting

1:57

elements of the principal building and

1:58

the real slate maner roof flanked by two

2:00

substantial brick chimneys the main

2:02

entrance features a paneled wooden door

2:04

set in a simple frame flanked by paneled

2:06

Sid lights and filled with wood which

2:08

are all topped with simple wooden

2:09

transoms and dentals is access by a

2:11

small concrete stoop sheltered by a

2:13

substantial Portico featuring D columns

2:15

large pills and an arched gable roof

2:17

pediment with dentals there are three

2:19

other entrances on the rear elevation

2:20

featuring a variety of materials and

2:22

Designs although all appear to have half

2:23

few paines pation throughout the

2:25

property has varied although all windows

2:27

appear to be wood and feature divided

2:29

like panes four of the six Dormer

2:31

Dormers feature arched windows with

2:33

Cardinal Arch designs the structure is

2:35

topped with steep gabled roofs which are

2:37

clad and real estate shingles newer

2:39

additions on the side and rear feature

2:41

flat rubber roofs the detached garage

2:43

garage is topped with a hip roof also

2:45

featuring real slate shingles front yard

2:48

features mature Landscaping with a brick

2:49

walkway through a well-maintained lawn

2:51

property retains much of its original

2:53

appearance and the building retains most

2:54

if not all of its architectural and

2:56

historic Integrity structure reflects

2:57

the architecture of older residential

2:59

structures along Front Street and

3:00

throughout the neighborhood and thus

3:02

contribut significantly to the

3:03

architectural and historic character of

3:05

the

3:06

community planning Bureau staff

3:07

recommends the request be approved with

3:09

the following conditions the applicant

3:10

will provide the planning Bureau with

3:11

all federal state and County licenses of

3:14

the facility operator to ensure that the

3:16

proposed use is in conformance with the

3:17

applicable specific criteria plan bu

3:20

staff recommends the request be approved

3:21

for the following reasons the proposed

3:23

use will be similar to that of the

3:24

previous business on site which operated

3:26

for 23 years and will accommodate the

3:28

same population groups as such impact

3:30

should be similar in nature and the

3:32

proposed use seeks to address a

3:33

vulnerable population and provide them

3:34

with Services which enable personal

3:36

growth and self-sufficiency allowing

3:38

them to thrive after their time at the

3:40

facility thank you Jeff could you take

3:43

your name address and relationship to

3:45

the project yes sir my name is David

3:47

keas with First Choice Home Buyers um my

3:49

personal home address is 35 lady

3:51

Harrington Drive in New York

3:52

Pennsylvania um and I'm the

3:55

owner did you oh first are you

3:57

acceptable of the condition

4:00

yes sir okay did you want to add

4:02

anything to the report I mean just as

4:04

far as context for our company um one of

4:06

the things that we love to do is take

4:07

old things to make them new um for this

4:09

particular building itself we don't

4:11

actually want to touch any architecture

4:12

because we do think it's a beautiful

4:14

building in and of itself I think I like

4:16

um Jeffrey said it definitely something

4:18

that we would love to keep and it's just

4:19

important to keep it as far from a

4:20

harrisb city standpoint um the other

4:22

thing is our commission statement is to

4:24

positively impact others through real

4:25

estate investing so we know one of the

4:26

ways we can do that is with this

4:27

particular building because we know we

4:29

can give

4:30

housing for homeless youth into that so

4:32

that's really really important um so

4:34

then partnering with a program like

4:35

Thrive Housing Services would be really

4:36

important for us um because no one

4:38

they're already doing it so they're

4:39

going to do it at a really high high

4:40

capacity what makes it exciting for us

4:43

to okay thank

4:45

you um Commissioners I have no questions

4:48

at this time if you have any concerns or

4:51

questions I'll start with commissioner

4:54

mckenic none of this

4:56

time

4:58

commission yes uh did you uh contact any

5:02

of the neighbors yes sir yep and I do

5:05

have as far as the letter itself and the

5:06

proof that they were all sent um actual

5:08

letter okay when were they sent uh it

5:10

was sent yesterday but I did it

5:11

overnight that they were supposed to get

5:12

it before six o'clock today ah

5:16

yeah

5:20

uh yeah I yeah something like this when

5:23

you when you're trying to put a a home

5:25

like this into or a facility like this

5:27

into a neighborhood we' really like to

5:29

get more of a Buy in from the

5:31

neighborhood uh in fact more so than the

5:34

letter I I'd encourage you to actually

5:37

hold a meeting answer questions that any

5:39

may have uh but you sending a letter

5:42

that they that arrived today I mean some

5:44

of them probably go home from work 5:30

5:46

6 o'clock and that's why they aren

5:49

probably never here to address this so

5:51

uh I strongly uh suggest that you you

5:54

know you asked us to continue this and

5:57

do this the right way but that's just my

5:59

position understood um guys follow would

6:02

you suggest would it be something that

6:04

be good to maybe go knock on doors or

6:06

would you kind of knock on yeah you do

6:09

one of two things knock on doors and and

6:11

get them to sign a a statement that they

6:13

they spoken to you and that they're

6:14

approval of it but even better the you

6:17

got the facility there invite them all

6:19

there you know some evening uh for a Q&A

6:22

and describe to them what you're

6:24

planning on doing uh I think it's a it's

6:26

important to let them know that it's

6:28

consistent with what the last owner did

6:30

because I mean that's a lot of people

6:31

don't know what went on there beforehand

6:33

so yeah that's just my

6:38

position commissioner Reed she's not

6:42

here commissioner U Mar thank you I was

6:47

going to ask uh similar questions as uh

6:50

commissioner UL did and I would just

6:52

state that I wholeheartedly second his

6:55

comments and would encourage you

6:57

actually urge you to do the same about

6:59

talking to the neighbors about this and

7:01

we'd probably like to see what their

7:04

feedback is on

7:07

this commissioner

7:10

Jordan um the only question I had right

7:12

now is um how many rooms are how many

7:15

people did you intend to have to a

7:17

particular room or unit yeah great great

7:19

question um so we're going to have eight

7:20

total youth that would be a lot in the

7:22

building that's based on the square

7:24

footage with the program itself okay so

7:25

one person per room U you're allowed to

7:28

have up to two um depending on Square

7:29

footage but yeah it will be one to two

7:32

and then they'll be 247

7:35

supervision thank

7:38

you

7:39

Jo I don't have any questions at this

7:42

time thank

7:44

you um we'll go to the public right now

7:49

is anyone in the public for against this

7:52

project if you are please stand and

7:55

state your name and address I'll start

7:57

to my left

8:01

you state your name and

8:16

address by the way the houses were built

8:19

1945 and next year with the 100th

8:22

anniversary k f wedding all these houses

8:25

have the the porticos across and they're

8:28

all built by the the famous Italian uh

8:32

architect I can't remember but anyway uh

8:35

I'd like to know about what this going

8:37

to do

8:40

supportive so

8:42

the I could be

8:45

anything and maybe I just didn't hear

8:48

exactly what it was yeah would it be

8:51

okay if I brought in the director of

8:52

this support of housing so she can best

8:54

explain it more so than I could more

8:57

El yeah you can mind just

9:06

bit I need her need you to state your

9:08

name address and relationship to the

9:11

project Allan 2601 wner Street

9:15

har and U we are the program that

9:20

property okay U gentleman like you to

9:23

explain what the project is um so the

9:27

project is um it's a housing program

9:29

so it can house either males or females

9:33

I closest okay no problem um it's a

9:38

housing it's a housing program that

9:40

houses males or females um and they can

9:43

be between the ages of 10 and 21 years

9:46

old so what we do is we we house um

9:50

referrals that are given to us from

9:52

Dolphin County and we provide services

9:55

uh we have a 24-hour staff that's at the

9:58

facility and we help them to basically

10:02

go to school um get their mental health

10:05

and um their uh medical things situated

10:10

these are um kids that are taken from

10:12

parents' custodies and putting into a

10:15

program so that a staff can help assist

10:17

them maintain their status in the

10:19

community attend their same schools keep

10:21

their same friends um and be able to

10:24

work to um become productive citizens

10:28

within the community currently right now

10:29

there's no Supportive Housing program

10:32

that Dolphin County can refer their kids

10:34

to within the county so all of

10:40

our well this will be a license program

10:42

so I'm not

10:43

[Music]

10:46

sure

10:51

Hill Street

11:00

anyway I I think we had something like

11:02

this in the city well I'm not I'm not

11:04

sure of any other programs that are in

11:06

the city I know our program is um has

11:09

been around for 10 years and we've been

11:11

doing it for a while um we are in um we

11:14

have other neighborhoods we're in pen

11:16

right we're all in Harrisburg we um we

11:20

have we're only in Dolphin County but we

11:22

serve as kids from maybe possibly

11:24

Cumberland or Lancaster or York um and

11:28

the majority of our kids are Dolphin

11:30

County kids but the reason why we are

11:33

having a license facility is because

11:35

there's no license facility in dolphin

11:37

and all of our kids are getting

11:38

transported to different

11:41

cities well I would still think uh in my

11:44

opinion the historical value of those

11:47

houses along there and the 100th

11:51

anniversary coming up next year and I

11:54

can't recite all the history well I came

11:56

about it in his book so uh my suggestion

12:00

would be to deny

12:02

this I'll just add to it I do appreciate

12:05

it thank you very much um but we're not

12:06

looking to actually changeing historical

12:09

footprint or the exterior of the city as

12:11

well or the the building as well so we

12:13

we for sure want to keep that because it

12:15

adds a lot to

12:17

the thank

12:19

you um just to let everyone know

12:22

commissioner Jackson is a former

12:24

Planning Commission me member so I'm

12:29

glad you're still

12:31

active you we miss

12:35

you uh is there anyone else on my left

12:39

is there anyone in the center we against

12:41

this project I'm at the middle now is

12:43

there anyone for Center no one there

12:47

anyone to my

12:49

right could you could you use the

12:52

[Music]

12:53

microphone

12:58

ch thanks so much Rebecca leeart 609

13:02

shower Street in Harrisburg uh came here

13:06

similarly for a different project but

13:08

this pequs my interest because I live in

13:11

shypoke and so I don't know if

13:14

everyone's familiar with what's been

13:15

happening down in

13:17

shypoke um but I got to tell you I'm

13:20

exasperated by it on so many levels I

13:23

have an eight-month-old baby you're

13:25

going to hear a similar story when we

13:26

get to why I'm actually here I can't

13:29

take a walk with my baby in a stroller

13:31

without having uh someone on heroin

13:33

nodding out in front of me or a fist

13:35

fight in front of me breaks my heart

13:37

it's actually like I'm going to get

13:38

emotional just talking about it I've

13:40

owned my home there for over a decade it

13:43

has never been like this and uh I see

13:47

all types of folks trying to come in and

13:48

do something without doing A needs

13:50

assessment without figuring out what we

13:52

really need we're not getting to the

13:53

root of what's going on and we're

13:56

pushing people down to my area and we

13:59

are tired because we're a small little

14:01

neighborhood that can only do so much

14:03

and can only bear so much and um we're

14:07

going to get to some of this later on

14:08

but I do want to apology for trying to

14:10

be somewhere else in the city so I'm

14:12

actually going to speak a little bit in

14:14

favor of that because we do need to

14:16

start being cognizant of sharing this

14:20

across all of our community not

14:23

ostracizing and pushing it to one small

14:27

community and uh um you know have you

14:30

completed A needs assessment because

14:31

that's always you know I have a

14:33

sociology background and I implore

14:35

everyone that's trying to bring a

14:36

project like this in front of these

14:38

commissions to complete one get a

14:40

sociologist on board figure out what we

14:42

really need it's important it's really

14:44

important so have you done that no so I

14:47

mean what we have done is spoken to

14:49

someone like d who's actually in the

14:51

thick of it and has a bunch of

14:53

applicants and you know with kids that

14:55

have done nothing to deserve as far as

14:56

having to be displaced from the parents

14:58

you know so that would be the needs

14:59

assessment for us is going hey if we can

15:01

help multiple kids in one instance

15:03

that's what we're doing so we're not

15:04

looking to bring in someone like you

15:06

said it is sad right that's kind of why

15:08

like you said we're doing something

15:09

about it because they as I think we all

15:11

know right the the issues start at a

15:13

young age so if you get kids at a young

15:16

age that's very very important for us

15:19

and that's always been one of my wives

15:20

I've always wanted to do that as far as

15:22

really help kids because that's what's

15:24

going to be and they have someone like d

15:25

who has a background in it and who has

15:26

247 Supervision in it like that is what

15:29

I think a lot of people need and it is

15:31

it's sad though if you're feeling that

15:33

in your your own neighborhood and I

15:35

can't imagine right now as far as how

15:36

you're feeling but that's what we're

15:38

trying to do no and and I and I

15:40

appreciate that I still implore you to

15:41

do an actual full-fledged needs

15:44

assessment because what you think you

15:46

may need you may be very surprised about

15:48

what you need not to say that your

15:49

project is a no but but you may be you

15:53

may find out through that process that

15:55

there are things that you can tweak and

15:57

do that would be better Suited to the

15:59

specific community at hand because a lot

16:01

of times people make assumptions about

16:02

what folks need instead of really

16:04

bringing in people that are

16:06

Professionals in this line of work and

16:08

doing the due diligence to figure out

16:10

what the needs are for instance we got

16:13

uh two projects going about one's being

16:15

built the vopa and we're going to get to

16:17

it and another one that's coming in both

16:19

for

16:20

veterans how many veterans do we have

16:23

here we'll get to it but that's my point

16:27

right so you know I implore you to do

16:29

that I think it's also a great idea to

16:31

bring in some Community involvement get

16:33

the community involved have people take

16:35

a look at that understand your project

16:37

and solicit Buy in so thank you so muche

16:39

that's definitely the reason we're not

16:40

trying as first Force home buers to do

16:42

it and manage it ourselves right I'm not

16:43

going to be an expert I'm bringing in an

16:45

expert and somebody who does that on the

16:47

daily thank you is there anyone

16:50

else if not um again to back up my

16:55

Commissioners this is why we always ask

16:59

people to do uh petition or when you

17:03

come in the neighborhood for any project

17:05

you know to get together then you

17:07

wouldn't have this you could get their

17:10

input and then explain it to them so you

17:12

wouldn't have to come here and we have

17:14

to you know go back and forth so um

17:18

that's my concern

17:22

so Commissioners

17:26

uh motion or did you want to

17:31

add anything to the um the

17:38

conditions not could I get a

17:42

motion we allowed the motion to continue

17:44

it

17:46

you table it

17:54

it's with the understanding that they

17:56

would got do what they can to get some

17:57

Community buy and and um come

18:05

back all right yeah I'm going to make

18:08

that motion and uh and I encourage you

18:10

to do that and I think you'll be

18:11

surprised that that once you you bring

18:13

the Neighbors in and you talk to them

18:14

that they will be reasonable and as I

18:17

indicated earlier I think if you

18:18

explained to them what the the building

18:19

was used for prior and explained to them

18:21

that this is not much of a deviation

18:23

that that that will you that might be

18:24

enough to to win them over but and I'm

18:27

doing this as a favor don't think you're

18:29

going to get a motion to to approve it

18:31

tonight unless I'm misreading the the

18:34

commission up

18:35

here is there a second to the

18:38

motion I'll second it's been moved and

18:41

second to table this project

18:46

um all those in favor state by saying I

18:49

I I oppos exensions motion carried so I

18:56

would just you know take his suggestions

18:58

and

18:59

try to meet with the

19:04

people thank

19:22

you the next item number two this is a

19:25

land development plan

19:27

revision application for 112 Market

19:30

Street is Zone uh downtown Center is

19:34

followed by Brad Jones with the Veterans

19:37

building investors LLC is to convert the

19:41

existing eight story office building

19:43

into a mix use building with a bank on

19:46

the first floor and up to 35 residential

19:49

units on the upper floors this ldp was

19:53

originally reviewed by the Planning

19:55

Commission in April 2021 one

19:59

sequentially approved in May

20:03

2021 yeah uh thank you uh the applicat

20:06

proposing to convert the uh existing

20:08

eight story office building into a

20:09

residential building with 48 apartment

20:10

units I think the um reference to a bank

20:13

was uh transcription error from the

20:15

previous uh review of this case uh in

20:18

May of 2021 uh the current proposal only

20:22

considers uh the um construction of

20:26

apartment units uh within the building

20:28

uh the property at 112 Market Street is

20:30

a16 acre lot featuring an 8-story

20:34

50752 ft building which was constructed

20:36

in 1899 although there was a significant

20:38

expansion of the building in 1919

20:41

property is bounded by the property at

20:42

119 Strawberry Street to the North River

20:44

alley to the East Market Street to the

20:46

South and the property is at 100 Market

20:48

Street and 119 Strawberry Street to the

20:50

West this eight story sandstone and

20:52

brick masonry semi- detached structure

20:53

initially featured elements of the

20:54

French Renaissance Revival architectural

20:56

style but currently expresses elements

20:58

of the Art Deco style of architecture

20:59

from the early 20th century was

21:01

originally designed and constructed by

21:02

Architects Charles Howard Lloyd and

21:04

waren Weaver for the Harrisburg Board of

21:05

Trade and was one of harrisburg's early

21:07

skyscrapers the original High style

21:09

facade was unfortunately removed in 1919

21:12

when it was rededicated as the Veterans

21:13

Memorial Building as the building

21:15

expanded vertically and took on a new

21:16

appearance character defining features

21:18

include the granite water table the

21:19

ashler Sandstone exterior on the first

21:22

two stories with decorative cartouches

21:24

panels and stone Mullens between the

21:25

windows the beige brick masonry exterior

21:28

on the upper floors the floor to ceiling

21:29

Windows of the first floor the green

21:31

glaze paneling between the first and

21:33

second floors and on the rear of the

21:35

building the decorative standstone

21:37

Sandstone panels in laid into the brick

21:39

facade at the top level and a simple

21:40

parit with stately architectural

21:42

embellishments the main entryway

21:44

features two sets of commercial style

21:46

full view metal double doors topped with

21:48

a large multiplane multi pane plate

21:50

glass transom there is a secondary

21:52

access on the river alley elevation with

21:54

similar double doors and plate glass

21:55

transom within a recessed entrance

21:57

access by concrete steps and featuring

21:59

two metal wall scones ministration on

22:01

the first and second floors of the front

22:02

side elevations consists of tall metal

22:05

single pane windows separated by the

22:07

green glazed paneling the upper floors

22:09

feature ribbons of modern single pane

22:10

aluminum windows and different groupings

22:12

there are no windows on the rear

22:13

elevation structure features an elevator

22:15

penthouse on the roof and appears to be

22:17

topped with a flat rubber roof despite

22:19

the modern alterations the building

22:20

retains a substantial amount of

22:21

architectural Integrity as one of the

22:23

few large historic commercial Office

22:25

Buildings remaining downtown and thus

22:27

makes a significant architecture ual

22:28

contribution to the streetscape and

22:32

neighborhood the planning Bureau

22:35

recommends that the applicant uh

22:37

recommends that the request be approved

22:39

with the following conditions uh

22:40

planning Bureau recommends the applicant

22:41

considers retaining commercial space on

22:43

the first floor possibly in the area

22:45

directly accessible for Market Street to

22:46

promote a mixed use character and

22:48

activate the property throughout the day

22:50

uh the applicant should design all of

22:52

the residential units on the upper

22:53

floors to be at least visitable if not

22:55

fully ADA Compliant to ensure the units

22:57

are accessible to as much of the

22:59

population as possible finally the

23:00

planning Bureau recommends the applicant

23:02

coordinate with the city Engineers

23:03

office on signage and markings for River

23:05

Street which alert drivers to the

23:06

increased presence in pedestrian traffic

23:09

and make travel safer for all users of

23:10

the street plan Bureau staff recommends

23:12

the request be approved for the

23:13

following reasons the proposed project

23:15

will ensure the continued use and

23:16

occupancy of a of an historically and

23:18

architecturally significant building in

23:20

downtown Harrisburg while contributing

23:22

to the increasing number of residential

23:23

units in downtown Harrisburg

23:24

contributing to the Vitality of the

23:26

neighborhood uh the project is in

23:28

performance with all applicable soing

23:30

regulations and finally the proposed

23:32

project will add new residents to the

23:34

neighborhood and help activate Market

23:35

Street Riverfront Park on nights and

23:36

weekends while growing a customer base

23:38

to support local

23:39

businesses thank you Jeff um could you

23:42

state your name address and relationship

23:45

to the project sure my name is Brad

23:46

Jones I'm the president and CEO of

23:48

Harristown Development Corporation we're

23:50

the owner of the project with our

23:52

partners uh and my address is in

23:55

Strawberry Square okay uh Brad you heard

23:58

the um conditions are you acceptable we

24:01

are yes sir um I know you were here once

24:04

before and and um I think I asked you we

24:08

haven't given up yet I can't remember

24:10

that

24:12

part but um I know you said about the

24:15

parking you encouraged them to go to the

24:18

parking lots

24:19

and yes still yeah I as with u you know

24:24

many of our other uh projects we our

24:26

most recent sizable project is across

24:28

the square at the maner building which

24:30

we developed and opened in 2022 that's

24:33

about 28 units a little smaller than

24:36

this building but very similar project

24:39

um that's a six-story building it's and

24:42

this is an eight-story building um but

24:46

like at the maner we encourage our

24:48

tenants to find spaces in the garages um

24:52

and in other you know available parking

24:55

spaces that are uh you know able they're

24:58

able that they were able to

24:59

rent okay and as far as the traffic uh

25:03

flow of

25:04

traffic um is that going to be a concern

25:07

with

25:09

the your residents or not uh I don't

25:12

think so I know Jeffrey had had uh he

25:14

always does a fantastic job on these

25:16

case reports and I always learned

25:17

something more about the building and

25:19

after I hear his case report I'm I'm

25:21

happier that we bought the building um

25:23

even after hearing it the second

25:25

time so it is a great building and and I

25:28

don't think we're concerned about this

25:30

increasing any real traffic um you know

25:34

from a automobile standpoint we think

25:36

it'll increase pedestrian traffic which

25:37

is light on that section of Market

25:39

Street for sure um I I guess uh you know

25:44

the other thing that he raised to to me

25:47

in a a private uh email which was you

25:50

know that Market Street may be turning

25:52

two way at some point I there's been a

25:54

discussion about that I don't know how

25:57

far that's gotten in the in the process

25:59

but we're supportive of that idea and

26:02

that would certainly help uh maybe uh

26:04

encourage us to put a you know some kind

26:08

of commercial use on the first floor

26:10

right now we're just trying to look at

26:11

it uh in the current condition and say

26:14

well we could probably fit up to 48

26:15

units which is six units per

26:21

floor thanks sure uh Commissioners

26:24

that's all the questions I have um if

26:26

you have any concerns or questions so

26:28

I'll start with commissioner

26:31

McKenzie yes thank you Joe um 50,000

26:35

square feet 48 units less schedule

26:38

barrier and gross area in the building

26:40

how big are these units I didn't see

26:41

anything marked in here yeah they're um

26:44

they're mostly I'd say

26:46

between six and 700 square feet 6 700

26:50

square feet for uh you know one bedrooms

26:52

and you know8 to 800 to a th000 for two

26:56

bedrooms we just recently did a study uh

26:59

updated hour Market study

27:01

that said that uh you know the mix of

27:05

one bedrooms to two bedrooms should be

27:07

about 60% one bedrooms to 40% two

27:11

bedrooms yeah I don't disagree with that

27:13

okay um another question then and this

27:16

is probably the the bigger Challen well

27:17

there's two others um there is

27:20

discussion in here and it was something

27:21

that came up in my mind about completely

27:23

deactivating ground floor uh retail

27:26

space for residential MH and while it

27:30

may or may not make sense in that

27:32

particular part that one building doing

27:34

so would create a major president in our

27:37

downtown that I don't think the Planning

27:39

Commission has been looking to see

27:41

happen over the past number of years

27:43

[Music]

27:45

um 46 units versus 48 that's 4.1% I

27:49

think of your performa there to leave

27:53

perhaps two units in the corner there as

27:55

as commercial yeah uh is that on a

27:57

reason is if that were to be a condition

28:00

um i' I'd like it to not be a condition

28:02

but more of a recommendation just to to

28:04

be frank about it um I will say just as

28:08

an example um we just leased the uh you

28:13

know first floor of maner we left we

28:15

left the back of maner for apartments

28:19

there's three apartments on the back of

28:21

that uh four story building and we were

28:24

able to put those in there in a way that

28:26

it's they're very attractive units we

28:28

have a little Courtyard in the back we

28:30

kept the first floor retail specifically

28:32

because we want we want to activate the

28:34

street that's part of our mission and uh

28:37

so I think we're open to the idea but I

28:40

think and and you

28:42

know you're right I mean we it's a good

28:45

thing to have you know activation on the

28:47

street um I'd prefer it not to be a

28:49

condition I'd like to us to be able to

28:51

make the decision based on the market

28:53

right but we are if you look at um

28:58

when we when we did uh the benmar uh

29:01

project and I know you're very familiar

29:03

with that because it's your

29:05

neighbor um so you know we have Alicia's

29:08

restaurant there on the first floor one

29:09

side which was existing and then we have

29:11

not been able to get any traction on

29:13

that that other site at all uh

29:16

surprisingly

29:18

so I'd like the flexibility to be able

29:21

to to you know make a decision on that

29:24

but I but I'm supportive of your idea

29:27

right I think the key thing is you have

29:28

a key um signpost as the enter the city

29:33

at that location and you have the

29:35

opportunity even if you do change some

29:37

of the Landscaping I can easily see an

29:40

opportunity for a coffee shop or small

29:42

sure something that activates that that

29:44

corner that perhaps other downtown

29:47

retail like the maner doesn't really I

29:50

mean it's very vastly to two vastly

29:52

different retail environments you know

29:56

that versus the other so that from a

29:58

planning

29:59

standpoint and as importantly a

30:02

presedential

30:04

standpoint uh that all of downtown

30:07

Harrisburg the first floor becoming

30:09

residences is what follows so I have a

30:12

difficult time not making that a

30:13

condition I'm not proposing the first

30:15

floor all be I'm just proposing that

30:18

enough and I think 6 700 square feet for

30:21

kiosk exactly whether it's off Market

30:24

Street's probably what's in my mind

30:26

maybe it's on the other side that fa is

30:28

front yeah I mean it probably makes the

30:31

pro forma easier to compl to complete

30:34

initially because you're building two

30:36

less units right so I me you know uh so

30:40

look I I I hear you and we've I think if

30:43

you look at most of our projects um you

30:48

know the bog on cranberry we saved a

30:50

retail space in the front it was a small

30:52

one but it's kind of getting at what you

30:53

were saying medmar we we saved those

30:56

retail spaces Med saved a retail space

30:59

you know uh all the projects we did on

31:01

Chestnut Street all have first floor

31:03

retail spaces so we're you know the ELO

31:06

building first floor restaurant right so

31:08

almost everything we've done in the last

31:10

15 years on these apartment conversions

31:13

we've had an ability to do that so I'm

31:15

not opposed to and I know you've had

31:17

some difficulty renting some of that

31:19

first floor space in different locations

31:21

and that's not your fault that's this

31:24

unworkable uh parking lease deal that we

31:27

have which gives control over the

31:29

downtown right and I commend you for

31:31

attempting to do things in the downtown

31:33

because you look around it's not

31:34

happening because of that um but that

31:37

takes me to my last question and that is

31:40

several years ago we spent a great deal

31:42

of time looking at the impact of

31:47

downtown office conversions and folks

31:49

saying well we're going to urge people

31:51

to go in the parking garages at you know

31:53

$180 a month if you get the day in day

31:55

out plan which nobody knows about uh or

31:58

the other spaces up to $300 a month for

32:00

guaranteed space um instead what we're

32:03

finding is the developers are dropping

32:05

them into paying $40 for on Street uh

32:09

let's compete with the already

32:10

established neighbors for the the spaces

32:13

that exist right now and I think there

32:14

was that point in time and maybe Sean

32:17

you may remember the exact numbers but

32:19

it was something

32:20

like what was it 350 parking spaces or

32:24

400 and there were, 1500 permits that

32:27

had been sold in the downtown for those

32:29

same spaces how do we prevent that from

32:32

happening here yeah it's a great

32:34

question and and you and I have talked

32:36

about this in other meetings and and it

32:38

is a uh it is a conundrum because what

32:43

really needs to happen I think you guys

32:44

were trying to do this which is you know

32:47

we need to expand the residential

32:48

parking as the downtown is changing and

32:51

it will continue to

32:52

change as as a more of a residential

32:54

downtown as it than it has been right so

32:57

the way that my understanding and I'm

32:59

you guys are the experts at this but my

33:01

understanding is the way it's supposed

33:02

to work is that that that residential

33:05

system is supposed to flex and and and

33:08

be adapted to the conditions of the

33:11

downtown community

33:13

right and so so as so because you're

33:18

you're allowing you know more you want

33:20

to create more residential like for

33:22

example Pine Street which some would

33:24

argue could be more res could be more of

33:26

a residential parking Street as now as

33:28

opposed to a metered space yeah the

33:31

problem comes back that the city has to

33:33

pick up that difference under the deal I

33:35

understand and I don't think we have the

33:36

tax base to be be subsidizing even

33:39

further into the parking deal so I mean

33:41

I on the surface it makes sense in many

33:43

other places it would be set up properly

33:46

only thing I can offer you is $50 a

33:48

month for spaces in our lot that we do

33:49

control on City Island sure you know

33:52

that which is not a bad walk from there

33:55

yeah across the bridge but um that a

33:58

that's a struggle for me and again we

33:59

have that hope even though it's not a

34:02

required parking in the downtown um

34:04

because that's the nature of the zoning

34:06

is there um I'm having the trouble with

34:10

this $40 a month Wild West sell a

34:14

license to people coming in from out of

34:16

the city to park on the on street park

34:18

and there's nothing available for people

34:20

who've been there for years yeah and

34:22

these were we've had the elderly coming

34:24

to us in past meetings and that's been a

34:27

major issue going up through Locust

34:28

Street and moving up

34:30

and I and you're in a great position to

34:33

be able to suggest ideas as well as you

34:35

know the city how do we solve it sure

34:37

now I understand it's I mean look uh I'd

34:41

like to see more residential parking

34:43

spaces I think we all would um and you

34:47

know we all know I think that there's

34:50

going to be a lot of we're either going

34:52

to be looking at a lot of empty

34:54

buildings like 112 Market Street in in

34:56

the next five to 10 years there's

34:58

already dozen buildings just like it or

35:01

or similar that are available for sale

35:04

and the the thing that's working is

35:07

residential it's where and we need more

35:08

housing in the city but we got to figure

35:11

out a way to accommodate this issue and

35:14

it is a tricky one I agree uh we've had

35:17

good luck in um not losing partment

35:22

tenants because of the parking deal but

35:24

it is not always you do lose some right

35:27

because it's it's an extra expense if

35:29

I'm out in some Suburban apartment

35:32

complex I don't have to worry about that

35:33

right that's one more thing to worry

35:35

about to pay for and so um I don't have

35:39

any easy answers I'd like to see the

35:42

system um be a little more flexible with

35:45

residential there's plenty of spaces in

35:47

the parking system as we all know

35:51

there's that you walk I walk the garages

35:53

and count cars that's how exciting my

35:55

life is um and uh you know there's

35:58

nobody in the Market Square garage right

36:01

nobody in it 100 cars maybe a day it

36:04

holds a thousand cars maybe 12 even

36:06

1,200 and so we should be making we

36:09

should be imploring the system to make

36:13

those spaces more affordable for

36:16

residents with less restrictions but I

36:19

think I think the problem is it's not

36:20

even the system manager that's involved

36:23

it's it's the peda project understood

36:25

and it would have to be peda who would

36:27

decide they want to subsidize the

36:28

development of downtown Harrisburg and

36:30

the rebirth yep and that's not happening

36:33

yeah and I think we need to continue

36:35

those conversations because it is a

36:36

serious issue and um I when people ask

36:39

me about parking I say look I have a 50

36:41

slide presentation how much time do you

36:43

have um but we we that's we we have to

36:46

attack that problem in the next five to

36:47

10 years it's a serious one you are

36:49

right absolutely right about

36:51

it that's all for now thank you gr

36:55

commissioner Mur

36:57

I don't have any questions at this time

37:00

commissioner

37:02

Jordan I just wanted to Echo that I I'm

37:05

also in agreement about possibly leaving

37:08

some of the first floor for retail um

37:11

beyond that I think it's a great idea

37:14

that you're actually having larger units

37:16

because a lot of the downtown um

37:18

projects that have come before us are

37:19

studios in one bedroom so you know thank

37:22

you for at least um bringing forth a

37:23

project that has larger bedrooms sure

37:25

sure thank you

37:29

Joe uh I don't have any additional

37:32

questions but um commissioner UL did you

37:34

get a chance

37:36

to you might you might es skip Sean here

37:38

so wonder why you're sitting I I I would

37:42

defer at this time to

37:44

commissioner Brad what the what are you

37:47

looking at for monthly rents for these

37:50

well we're we're I mean one of the

37:52

reasons we uh haven't gotten this

37:55

project finished yet um is that when we

37:58

first started to price it the pricing

38:00

kind of went haywire as I think many of

38:03

you know and so interest rates and

38:06

construction pricing kind of went

38:08

haywire so we're repricing this right

38:10

now with a couple different contractors

38:12

to try to understand what the economics

38:14

of it look like and then we'll be better

38:17

able to you know price the units um I I

38:21

know where you're headed with this

38:22

question and I'll try to answer it in a

38:24

couple different ways uh we have taken a

38:29

about 63 of our units and made them into

38:33

affordable housing for our uh

38:36

employees and for other folks in the

38:38

market uh over the last three or four

38:41

years so we have uh units that are

38:46

starting as low as around $700 a month

38:49

and going up to about 950 a month and in

38:52

that range we also

38:55

subsidize at about $150 a month for our

38:58

employees as well to live in those units

39:00

so so uh 20 25% of our

39:04

portfolio is in that that range of sort

39:07

of I'll call it Workforce housing

39:11

market does that

39:13

help of those 63 how many of them

39:17

are are filled by your

39:19

employees uh I'd say about

39:22

20 20 about 20 units are filled and then

39:25

the rest are in the marketplace

39:29

all

39:30

right

39:34

uh and we are open to you know looking

39:38

at creating some affordable units in

39:40

this project if that's your

39:42

question this project to any project I

39:44

mean with the affordable housing crisis

39:46

in this in this town and in this country

39:48

I just don't understand I mean to

39:51

justify your tax exemption why you

39:52

aren't trying to put more of them out

39:53

there and and the ones you have out

39:55

there for your employees that's I I see

39:58

no charity there I'm sorry I don't

40:00

understand the the tax exemption we're

40:02

paying full real estate taxes just like

40:03

everybody else you're 501 we're not a

40:06

501c3 you are not no we are not we are a

40:10

501c4 we're an Economic Development

40:12

Corporation okay so we are not a

40:13

charitable organization okay but you're

40:15

tax exempt no we are not tax exempt on

40:17

your five if you're 501c4 you're tax we

40:19

are tax from for federal taxes only but

40:22

we're paying real estate taxes is my

40:23

point just like everyone else I I

40:26

understand that

40:28

but I I just feel that the

40:31

well yeah I I I just feel you should

40:33

feel more of an obligation to try to put

40:35

uh affordable housing out there for

40:37

people other than your employees sure

40:39

point and we are and we have another as

40:41

I said we have about 60 some apartments

40:43

that are in that range so there's

40:45

another 40 people in the market you know

40:47

we'd like to serve more people in that

40:49

area and we'll certainly try to do that

40:51

with this project if we can but I I've

40:53

seen the numbers and they're tough so

40:55

it'll be hard um

40:57

it's hard to make the numbers work uh

40:59

you know I mean we would have started

41:01

this project if we thought we could have

41:03

done it a few years ago now in the

41:05

meantime the first floor bank has left

41:08

and the second floor office tenant has

41:10

been relocated so we have an opportunity

41:12

to Now sort of take a fresh look at

41:15

it all right uh who who who makes up uh

41:19

Veterans building investors uh it is uh

41:22

select Capital commercial properties and

41:25

Harristown

41:27

all right nothing further

41:31

okay um I'll go to the public if

41:34

anyone's for against this project pleas

41:36

St your name and address and I'll start

41:38

to my

41:40

left St your name and address my name

41:48

is yeah uh so the building was purchased

41:51

by Dolphin County uh back I don't know

41:54

in the 80s I think and um

41:57

the County Commissioners one of the

42:00

County Commissioners uh his father was

42:03

the I think the regional National

42:06

commander of the American Legion um and

42:08

they wanted to name the building after

42:10

him and so they did that and they called

42:12

it the Veterans building and his picture

42:15

is on the uh front of the building and

42:18

we told his family that we would

42:20

continue to leave it there and you know

42:22

respect that and that's why it's called

42:23

the Veterans building so understand

42:30

oh it's I that was just chosen I mean

42:33

somewhat serendipitously but because it

42:35

was called the veterans build I think it

42:37

was it was a matter of

42:38

[Music]

42:42

convenience yeah I'll bet you are yeah

42:44

he's kind of a

42:45

legend

42:51

yeah anyone from the center for against

42:53

the

42:55

project anyone to

42:59

right commissioner got to get a

43:07

motion yeah I would be prepared to make

43:10

a motion

43:12

uh to approve the project with the

43:14

condition of um probably the equivalent

43:17

of two of the units which I guess is

43:19

about 12,00 square fet of retail or

43:21

commercial or some other non-residential

43:24

use uh on the ground floor uh the only

43:28

other condition I may I guess it would

43:30

be a suggestion we'll put under that

43:32

category and that is that

43:34

[Music]

43:36

um you do I'm putting my planning or my

43:40

parking authority chair hat on here that

43:43

you do send people over to see us in our

43:45

empty garages and that they do look at

43:47

the plan that's in place and that allows

43:50

them to stay in the garage till I think

43:52

10:00 in the morning or 800 in the

43:53

morning and then be back at 5: and they

43:56

get two night two days during the week

43:58

and they get the weekends which a lot of

44:00

people it's not well publicized and it

44:02

really needs to be uh it's kind of

44:04

halfway it's not great but it's not

44:06

terrible y so

44:10

understood is there a second on the

44:18

motion there's no second I'll second

44:20

that it's been moov the second for

44:23

approval with the added conditions

44:32

one's a condition and then I also adding

44:34

the the suggestion to my

44:38

monologue yes yes well well well the

44:41

first condition was reflective of one of

44:43

the conditions in the case report

44:45

yeah you were making a recommendation

44:48

Vern is correct making this more of a

44:51

firm condition okay I just the language

44:54

is a little unclear that's that's what

44:55

we're item one is what I'm making a a

44:58

condition of my of my

45:00

proposal um you know the uh the

45:03

visitable aspect uh I have no problem

45:06

with adding that as an condition because

45:08

I think it makes good common sense

45:09

visitable and it doesn't look like your

45:11

plan needs much done to it to achieve

45:13

that from what I see that that by design

45:15

has in there and of course the signage

45:18

and Market is it should be

45:22

included do that make sense Neil it does

45:30

yeah yes sir thank

45:35

you person who second it agrees with

45:40

that mooved and second for approval with

45:42

the additions all those in favor state

45:45

by saying I I I

45:48

oppos abion motion C thank you very much

45:52

appreciate your time I have a a little

45:54

something for you guys a 50y year

45:56

anniversary book that I thought you

45:57

might

46:05

[Music]

46:07

enjoy thank

46:18

you okay we're on item number three this

46:21

is a subdivision plan application for

46:24

1103 South Front Street it's Z RF is

46:28

filed by Steven Stillers tunnel to

46:31

Towers Foundation just to sub subdivide

46:35

the existing Oro into two individual

46:39

lights uh yes so uh this is the first I

46:43

guess component of the overall um

46:45

project here uh but the applicants did

46:47

submit two separate um applications to

46:50

subdiv preliminary final subdivision and

46:52

then a preliminary Land Development as

46:53

opposed to more traditionally a

46:55

preliminary final subdivision and land

46:57

development plan um so the applicants

47:00

are proposing to subdivide the existing

47:01

parcel into two individual Lots which

47:04

will each accommodated Supportive

47:05

Housing project and the applicant has

47:08

submitted an accompanying preliminary

47:10

Land Development plan uh for the

47:12

northernmost lot uh the property 1103

47:15

South Front Street is a 15 acre lot

47:16

which is largely vacant although it

47:18

still retains some of the of the

47:19

building foundations and site

47:20

infrastructure from when the property

47:22

accommodated a steel mill currently it

47:24

accommodates a critical connection of

47:25

the capital green Bel but little in the

47:27

way of development or active uses

47:29

property is bounded by the property 1101

47:30

South Front Street to the north railroad

47:32

tracks to the east the property 1105

47:34

South Front Street to the South and the

47:36

Susan River to the West the planning

47:39

Bureau staff recommends the request be

47:41

approved for the following reasons the

47:43

proposed subdivision will create

47:45

individual Lots which are in conformance

47:46

with the applicable zoning regulations

47:48

regarding development standards and the

47:50

proposal will help effectuate the

47:52

development of transitional housing uh

47:54

across two separate projects one for

47:56

homeless veterans the subject property

47:57

and another for the broader homeless

47:59

population at a future parcel to the

48:17

South okay

48:20

um thank you Jeff I'm

48:22

sorry uh could you state your name and

48:25

address and relationship my name is

48:27

Bruce grman I represent I'm attorney

48:30

representing the Steven Siller tunnel to

48:32

Towers Foundation uh My office address

48:35

is 3631 North Front Street uh joining me

48:39

tonight are two uh officials from the

48:43

foundation I'd like to introduce they

48:46

they have to introduce themselves right

48:49

they got to speak

49:02

thank you very much my name is Linda Cox

49:05

I'm the associate vice president for

49:06

government Affairs and development for

49:07

the tunnels Towers

49:09

Foundation

49:12

okay Lewis Menendez director of

49:15

construction for the homeless veterans

49:17

program um 70 Oakwood Avenue mon Clair

49:20

New

49:21

Jersey um Miss Cox would like to uh

49:25

introduce uh

49:27

the foundation and its mission to the

49:29

panel um and discuss why they chose this

49:34

project we we already had that I

49:39

think yeah we got to get to the report

49:41

all right um let me uh this is a EXC no

49:47

I

49:48

think rendering

49:52

[Music]

49:59

this is the n rendering of

50:01

the propos project it's artistic

50:06

rendering it's not exact in all details

50:09

that will be set for Land

50:12

Development um simply the subdivision

50:14

itself is to take the northernmost 8.5

50:18

Acres of the property that would be the

50:21

property uh AB buding the employee

50:25

parking lot from the Riverside Office

50:28

Center um and uh there is an existing

50:32

Road already down to Veterans Grove um

50:37

and so that would pass through this

50:39

property and there is the emergency

50:42

access River down

50:44

to so this property would go from just

50:48

about before the railroad tracks on the

50:53

East down to the river on the west the

50:57

property line with the general Authority

50:59

for the Riverside Office Center and

51:03

then East West line at its Southern

51:06

border that would leave

51:09

approximately 6 Acres between veterans

51:13

grow and the proposed

51:16

project so that is the element of the

51:21

sub okay thank

51:24

you um commissioner

51:27

uh I have no questions on the

51:30

subdivisions if you have questions or

51:32

concerns I'll start with

51:35

commission uh good evening uh I guess

51:38

the first question I have is I would

51:40

like to hear about how you have

51:42

addressed the number one concern the

51:44

Planning Commission had previously

51:46

relative to the green belt uh and

51:49

whether we're going to get a gap in that

51:51

after 90 or 100 years that it's been in

51:54

existence um I don't believe it's been

51:56

that

51:57

sir but uh ever since the last meeting

52:01

the foundation has had uh a meeting with

52:05

um uh its Executive Vice President um a

52:10

representative of the green belt

52:12

Association and the national 9911 Trail

52:16

uh there's been further discussions and

52:18

as will be discussed in the land

52:21

development plan um the green belt

52:24

Association has been offered Passage

52:27

along the um eastern border of the

52:31

property um a sidewalk next to the

52:34

access

52:37

road and that would

52:39

be where can you mark can you please

52:42

mark where that is

52:44

okay that will be shown on the land

52:46

development plan there's the access road

52:49

and the sidewalk would be parallel to

52:52

that

52:56

again that would

52:58

be like

53:01

that it it follows it follows the

53:04

Contour of the

53:07

road I guess we're looking trying to

53:09

look at the plans we have here we're not

53:10

seeing it well they're in the land

53:12

development

53:14

plan okay

53:18

right for what was the width to that

53:21

sidewalk I'm sorry what is the width to

53:23

that sidewalk sir I believe I believe

53:25

it's 5et

53:29

you also have um L would you discuss the

53:33

grade that uh that sidewalk uh yeah so

53:38

so the sidewalk follows the road so it's

53:41

pretty much it's a level sidewalk with

53:43

obvious obvious pitch for drainage but

53:46

it follows the Contour of the road from

53:49

the uh property line all the way up to

53:52

thej uh the other property line prior to

53:55

the crossover over at the bridge here so

53:58

we we are providing access uh pedestrian

54:01

access across this

54:04

road to our property

54:07

line which connects or at least provides

54:11

an opportunity to walk on a sidewalk or

54:14

ride on this road

54:17

to uh the access road in beyond our

54:21

property mat what's the nature of that

54:23

road is that a gravel or no it's will be

54:26

P it is okay this road is

54:30

existing um and it connects like I said

54:33

like we said the vola village to the

54:36

access road here on South Front Street

54:39

leading out to

54:40

camore now I guess the other question is

54:43

once I get to that point and I leave

54:44

your property I believe because the

54:46

other six acres is

54:49

separate so we still don't have a

54:51

guarantee that it's going to be allowed

54:52

to be continued past that property line

54:55

under this proposal well have no control

54:58

in the sketch pan review of the Eden

55:00

Village I believe a couple months ago um

55:02

the applicants for the Eden Village did

55:04

Express um support for retaining the

55:07

existing connection there I think the

55:09

major issue with what the applicants are

55:10

proposing and as they will know is that

55:13

uh the Dolphin County General Authority

55:15

has um pretty much indicated no un

55:17

certain terms that they will be

55:19

preserving or reserving no additional

55:21

space for the green belt so once they

55:23

hit the northern edge of their property

55:25

line there's no sidewalk there there's

55:27

going to be no reserved uh space for the

55:29

types of children and elderly that will

55:32

then have to ride through the parking

55:34

lot of the pend out facility mixing with

55:36

drivers there um which is frankly in my

55:39

opinion very dangerous uh you have

55:41

people there that are going back there

55:42

to get their license because they lost

55:44

them probably for poorly driving and I

55:46

think what that ends up doing is it ends

55:49

up mixing again vulnerable Trail users

55:52

in with um in a completely regulated

55:57

parking lot with drivers Mr chairman

56:00

with all respect um the issue before the

56:03

panel is the subdivision at this time we

56:06

understand that the issue will be

56:08

addressed but the issue before the panel

56:11

is the subdivision

56:14

I I have no more questions I'd like to

56:16

hear the Public's comments when we get

56:18

past the Commissioners and reserve a

56:20

right to come back commission O2 yeah I

56:23

just want to reiterate for the public

56:25

here that what what was just stated that

56:27

we have two two matters that are in

56:30

front of us the first is just a simple

56:32

subd division

56:33

it's it's easier the two the next one so

56:36

if we if we get through this without

56:38

addressing the issues you thought we

56:40

should be addressing it's because we

56:41

have a second one on the agenda that's

56:43

all I

56:45

have yeah that's correct I was trying to

56:47

keep them separate because I knew it

56:48

would be more issues on the other one so

56:52

um commissioner

56:53

[Music]

56:54

Merck thank you so so for the proposed

56:58

subdivision

57:00

um your entity is proposing to subdivide

57:03

these Lots but you are only taking

57:05

ownership of proposed lot three that's

57:09

correct yes who is taking ownership of

57:12

residual lot

57:15

one it's talked about being an entity

57:19

related to even Village an unrelated

57:22

entity we have no definite knowledge

57:25

that so they are purchasing it or

57:28

anything like

57:33

that and I'm assuming that entity is the

57:38

Veterans housing no it's a third third

57:42

so what you see on the board as residual

57:46

lot

57:47

one is what will be left of the there

57:51

originally the parcel was approximately

57:53

20 acres M uh veterans Outreach took the

57:58

southern most five acres right um the

58:03

tunnel to Towers Foundation is proposing

58:05

to take the northernmost 8.5 acres and

58:09

when you do your math that leaves about

58:11

six acres in the middle so residual lot

58:15

one is what's left those six

58:20

acres of the 14 every yeah unclaimed I'm

58:24

just trying to understand who's taking

58:25

respons abil like the ownership of of

58:29

the LA when we get to these future

58:31

questions that remain on the development

58:34

of

58:36

it that's the only question I have at

58:38

this

58:40

time okay uh commissioner

58:44

Jordan um as far as the subdivision is

58:47

concerned I have no

58:49

questions and Joe no questions thank you

58:53

okay we'll go to the public on this this

58:56

is remember this is only for the

58:59

subdivision um I have any concerns to my

59:11

left no

59:13

concerns in the

59:16

middle any concerns with the subdivision

59:19

on my

59:24

right hello uh my name is Ed jerich I

59:27

live at 1521 North 2 Street apartment

59:29

number one in Midtown my concern really

59:32

about all this I just heard about this

59:34

uh you know day or two ago and was

59:37

mainly the green belt I don't know what

59:39

all is going on here all the various

59:41

pieces of Land Development but when

59:43

we're done we can't screw up the green

59:45

bille right that's been here a long time

59:48

the whole County enjoys that right

59:50

that's a big organization and I just

59:52

think all you lawyers and people have to

59:55

figure it out so that does does not get

59:57

get messed with but to the point about

59:59

this subdivision plan just as a

1:00:01

non-expert just as a normal citizen I

1:00:04

don't think the applicant has convinced

1:00:06

me that it's needed to be done now my

1:00:08

concern is you know when all these

1:00:10

homeless uh the Veterans Park you know

1:00:12

it was originally proposed as the other

1:00:14

project was 15 quaint you know little

1:00:18

transitional housing and now you know if

1:00:20

I'm reading this right we're going to

1:00:21

have 64 units plus 20 more and now it

1:00:25

sounds like we're spending off another

1:00:26

lot which I assume smart people get

1:00:28

another 64 in there you know like I know

1:00:31

this is done in pieces and there's

1:00:33

little incremental spots to it but like

1:00:36

who's got the big master plan where

1:00:38

we're ending up I mean there's a big

1:00:39

impact I think it's risky any time you

1:00:42

take any kind of individuals a certain

1:00:44

economic or social problem and

1:00:46

concentrate them too closely together

1:00:49

and so that's my concern and for that

1:00:50

reason I I hope you you little table or

1:00:52

delay or deny this subdivision plan

1:00:55

because I don't don't think it's going

1:00:56

to stop them from doing the project

1:00:58

thank you for your time thank

1:01:01

you Commissioners um did I get a motion

1:01:05

on the

1:01:10

subdivision oh did I

1:01:19

miss the in answer to that question if I

1:01:22

may Mr s the very Eastern part

1:01:27

um is in the 500-year flood plane next

1:01:30

to the railroad tracks and Paxon cree

1:01:33

and the Very western part obviously is

1:01:35

the river but in between is the 100-year

1:01:38

flow plan and all of the development

1:01:40

would be done in the 100e FL uh yeah

1:01:44

just to correct that the whole property

1:01:46

is in the it's all being developed on

1:01:47

the 500

1:01:53

year I'm sorry I don't

1:02:08

Phoenix not as residen as

1:02:16

Ser I mean historically the property has

1:02:18

been an industrial site I think it's

1:02:21

remained an industrial site till

1:02:23

today okay who was that

1:02:30

hi Rebecca leeart 609 shower Street in

1:02:33

the city so I do have issue with the

1:02:37

proposal similar to Ed jrock's comment

1:02:40

of the subdivision and I also have some

1:02:42

history I think it's important to to

1:02:44

chat about

1:02:45

BPA uh at the time I was the president

1:02:48

of the shuk neighborhood association we

1:02:50

did end up putting forth a letter of

1:02:54

recommendation for that project but but

1:02:55

with a lot of dialogue and discussion

1:02:57

that has not occurred to my best

1:02:59

knowledge at all uh with the community

1:03:02

at large in shipoke I know there's been

1:03:04

a lot of public publicity and putting

1:03:06

forth articles in the burg but not

1:03:08

actually talking to the citizens which

1:03:10

are deeply impacted by a very

1:03:12

complicated issue at the moment uh which

1:03:15

I touched upon

1:03:16

earlier additionally vpa originally

1:03:20

wanted to I believe it was 15 Parcels of

1:03:23

land to reone ownn to to basically

1:03:28

accommodate for the the tiny homes and

1:03:31

we really adamantly fought that because

1:03:34

we realized what was being asked was the

1:03:38

ability while it seemed benign at the

1:03:40

time it was the ability for the future

1:03:43

build of really anything right because

1:03:46

if you rezoned it to allow for tiny

1:03:49

homes you rezoned it to allow for really

1:03:53

a sort of a free-for-all build and um

1:03:56

I'm really happy that we did that but I

1:03:58

feel like I'm living a

1:04:00

nightmare that here we are again and we

1:04:02

haven't even seen vopa be occupied we we

1:04:06

signed off on something that was sort of

1:04:08

um experimental in a way we haven't seen

1:04:10

that we don't know what that looks like

1:04:12

for us as a community I haven't heard

1:04:14

vopa checking back in with us uh

1:04:16

personally to you know uh Garner any

1:04:20

feedback one of the other things that

1:04:22

struck me about vopa and we have to talk

1:04:24

about vopa because it's laying the

1:04:26

foundation and Peggy selling all the

1:04:27

land right it's all her land it's

1:04:29

similar so you know I I remember and I

1:04:33

recollect that at the

1:04:35

time the the tiny hubs were not going to

1:04:38

have showers inside and and we were

1:04:39

being told that that was purposeful

1:04:41

because they wanted to really bring

1:04:44

people back into a community building

1:04:46

setting and really keep an eye on the

1:04:47

folks and really tend to them and I

1:04:49

thought okay that's that's meaningful

1:04:52

right like and then when it ended I saw

1:04:55

article in the burg and now they're

1:04:58

essentially you know Standalone homes so

1:05:00

we weren't told that up front and the

1:05:02

zoning pass and now it's switched and

1:05:04

maybe it's all fine I don't know but I

1:05:06

think that's the point we don't know and

1:05:09

now you're telling me that you're going

1:05:10

to parcel off and subdivide these two

1:05:13

pieces of land and I'm not really sure

1:05:18

what this even means for us not to

1:05:21

mention the fact that at stated where's

1:05:24

the needs assessment this is the one

1:05:26

that we're talking about tonight that we

1:05:28

do know who's going to occupy it again

1:05:31

it's being slated for veterans and I

1:05:35

must have to presume because I'm

1:05:37

familiar with the folks that and working

1:05:39

when I was a president of the

1:05:40

neighborhood association the capitol

1:05:43

area Coalition on homelessness that we

1:05:45

did not have we we barely had enough to

1:05:47

fill the 15 tiny homes I think that they

1:05:49

were looking at the broader like central

1:05:51

Pennsylvania to fill those homes and so

1:05:53

that doesn't alleviate the stress that

1:05:56

we are under and then of course it's

1:05:58

just the open dialogue again of what you

1:06:00

know Ed jerro said as well about and I

1:06:03

touched on earlier that everything is

1:06:05

being placed in one tiny concentrated

1:06:08

area and I haven't heard anyone when

1:06:09

they presented this plan to talk about

1:06:12

shypoke putting up against it and this

1:06:14

is even closer to

1:06:16

us I you know I have serious serious

1:06:20

fears of what this looks like and I

1:06:22

agree once you subdivide this land

1:06:24

listen it's strategic just like it was

1:06:26

strategic to try to pass you know the

1:06:29

the rezoning for tiny homes in spaces

1:06:32

where tiny homes were never meant to go

1:06:34

um I hope that the vpa project works out

1:06:37

I ended up giving it my you know my my

1:06:40

letter of recommendation I think I

1:06:42

signed that letter personally and I'd

1:06:44

like to see it be successful but we need

1:06:46

to see what happens what does that look

1:06:49

like for a whole community of folks with

1:06:51

little kids and elderly folks that are

1:06:54

really under a lot of stress and strain

1:06:57

right now and aren't feeling like we

1:06:59

even have a voice in the

1:07:03

room you know I implore everyone here

1:07:07

please please give our community time to

1:07:10

interact with these folks understand

1:07:12

what this plan really is what is the

1:07:14

full intent what is the full scope of

1:07:16

the ultimate picture what does it mean

1:07:19

for

1:07:20

us we're not saying that we we're nimi

1:07:23

and we don't want folks in our backyard

1:07:25

we're saying we want meaningful

1:07:27

thoughtful approaches to solving a

1:07:29

problem that involves us people that

1:07:32

also live here

1:07:37

too so you know I thank everyone for

1:07:40

their time and please please I I hope we

1:07:43

could get a community presentation

1:07:44

before we subdivide the land of what

1:07:46

this really looks like I'd love to see

1:07:48

it down at the park it's a great place

1:07:50

for us to meet not put it through the

1:07:53

Berg talk to the folks that really live

1:07:55

there thank

1:07:57

you Mr chairman if I may I have relevant

1:08:02

information to that um Miss Cox uh has

1:08:06

uh information about reaching out to the

1:08:09

sholk

1:08:10

association chairman my office reached

1:08:13

out to miss Whitaker um on April 24th to

1:08:17

try to connect with them we offered a

1:08:19

visit that I was having the next week in

1:08:21

Pennsylvania and offered to set up a

1:08:23

virtual call or come and talk at a

1:08:25

different time we never received a

1:08:34

response out a mailer

1:08:37

every and make sure also my take on the

1:08:42

neor association is that uh some folks

1:08:45

within that Association would like to

1:08:48

distance themselves all together from

1:08:51

any of the homeless issues happening

1:08:53

because they're worried about the

1:08:54

property value

1:08:56

I hate to say that but that's you know

1:08:58

that's the word in the neighborhood and

1:09:01

so that's probably why they didn't

1:09:02

respond to you but they don't speak for

1:09:06

everyone okay okay I'm I'm keep I'm

1:09:09

gonna cut you all I don't want to get

1:09:12

back and forth I was trying to keep this

1:09:14

to everybody can talk but I'm not going

1:09:16

to get into this back and forth and you

1:09:20

said you contact her she she's not but

1:09:23

that's a good suggestion send out

1:09:25

letters whatever else you can do for the

1:09:27

community but right now we're on the

1:09:32

uh subdivisions and I asked the people

1:09:37

in the middle I asked the people on the

1:09:39

left now we're going back again now I

1:09:43

gave you your

1:09:48

chance all right so we we we'll get to

1:09:52

that okay Commissioners we're on

1:10:01

subdivision is there a

1:10:05

second second this been moved and second

1:10:09

for approval with the

1:10:11

subdivision uh there's no conditions uh

1:10:14

no that all those in favor St by saying

1:10:18

I I opposed yes opposed one two oppos

1:10:25

[Music]

1:10:28

um all those in favor raise your

1:10:33

hand

1:10:36

oppos motion

1:10:38

Carri

1:10:43

than okay now we're on the land

1:10:46

development plan

1:11:21

okay um this is item number four this is

1:11:23

a preliminary Land Development plan

1:11:26

application for 1103 South Front Street

1:11:30

it's Zone RF followed by Steven

1:11:34

Stiller's tunnels to to Foundation

1:11:36

associated with the construction of

1:11:39

transitional housing development

1:11:41

featuring 64 units multif family goans

1:11:45

including services for residents and 20

1:11:48

detached

1:11:50

comp uh yes uh so the second component

1:11:54

um of this project uh is a proposal to

1:11:56

construct a transitional housing

1:11:58

development for homeless veterans

1:11:59

featuring two types of housing

1:12:00

accommodations along with Associated

1:12:02

site and access improvements project

1:12:04

includes a mixed use building with

1:12:06

tenant services and Community functions

1:12:07

on the first floor and 64 units on the

1:12:10

two floors above and 20 detached Comfort

1:12:12

homes project received zoning hearing

1:12:14

board approvals for the required zoning

1:12:15

relief requests at their June 22nd 2024

1:12:18

meeting property 1103 South Front Street

1:12:21

is a 15 acre lot which is largely vacant

1:12:23

though it still retains some of the

1:12:24

building foundations and site

1:12:25

infrastructure from when the property

1:12:27

accommodated steel mill currently it

1:12:29

accommodates a critical connection of

1:12:30

the Capital Area green Bel but little

1:12:31

else in the way of development or active

1:12:33

uses property is bounded by the property

1:12:35

at 1101 South Front Street to the north

1:12:37

railroad tracks to the east property at

1:12:39

1105 South Front Street to the South and

1:12:41

the susqu river to the

1:12:44

West the planning Bureau staff

1:12:46

recommends that the request be approved

1:12:48

of the following conditions the

1:12:50

applicant should redesign The Pedestrian

1:12:52

access through the middle of the project

1:12:53

site con connecting the front entrance

1:12:55

of the apartment building with the River

1:12:57

Front Overlook using raised crosswalks

1:12:59

across the drive aisles to prioritize

1:13:01

pedestrian safety and Ada

1:13:04

accessibility uh the applicant should

1:13:06

install landscape screening around the

1:13:08

proposed parking areas in order to

1:13:10

prevent headlight spill over into

1:13:12

residential units uh the planning Bureau

1:13:14

recommends that the applicant continue

1:13:16

coordination with the City Arborist

1:13:17

regarding required landscape screening

1:13:19

and trees the retention of existing

1:13:20

mature trees and the installation of

1:13:23

native plants and pollinator plants and

1:13:24

Landscape aped areas throughout the site

1:13:26

and more specifically around the

1:13:28

proposed storm water detention basins

1:13:30

and finally the project will accommodate

1:13:31

a relocated footprint of the Capital

1:13:33

Area Green Belt including the removal of

1:13:35

the proposed vehicular gate and fence

1:13:36

across the existing connection to the

1:13:38

green belt where the emergency access

1:13:39

road along the western portion of the

1:13:41

site interacts intersects with the

1:13:43

Dolphin County General Authority

1:13:44

property based on the proposed site

1:13:46

design the green belt can be

1:13:47

accommodated across the southern

1:13:48

boundary of the property connecting the

1:13:50

existing bridge over the railroad tracks

1:13:51

to the emergency access road along the

1:13:53

western boundary of the property uh

1:13:56

planning Bureau staff recommends the

1:13:57

request be approved for the following

1:13:58

reasons the applicants have received

1:14:00

approval from the zoning hearing board

1:14:01

for the various zoning relief requests

1:14:03

needed to effectuate the project as

1:14:05

proposed uh the proposed project will

1:14:06

meet a critical need housing for

1:14:08

homeless individuals and will

1:14:09

specifically Target a group veterans who

1:14:11

are disproportionately represented in

1:14:13

the homeless population will provide

1:14:15

quality accessible units that improve

1:14:16

their standard of living and will

1:14:18

introduce a housing approach that may be

1:14:19

a template for future projects uh the

1:14:22

project represents a continuation of

1:14:23

recent development projects in this area

1:14:25

intended to provide accommodations and

1:14:26

servicing for those services for those

1:14:28

experiencing homelessness and finally if

1:14:30

the recommended conditions of approval

1:14:32

are adopted proposed project will result

1:14:34

in improvements to the site that will

1:14:35

provide benefits to the greater Public

1:14:37

Welfare including increased vegetation

1:14:38

ecological biodiversity improved

1:14:40

connectivity and Mobility for project

1:14:42

residents and retention and

1:14:43

formalization of green build access for

1:14:45

project residents and the general public

1:14:48

okay thank you

1:14:49

J um I believe everyone's here are you a

1:14:53

new person I'm a new person my name is

1:14:56

Betsy davidsson I'm an engineer with h

1:14:58

Edward blacken Associates in Harrisburg

1:15:00

we prepared the development plans okay

1:15:03

everyone heard the staff report are you

1:15:05

acceptable of the conditions um the

1:15:08

conditions are acceptable uh except as

1:15:11

to the fourth I'm not sure I understand

1:15:13

it we did uh include access for the

1:15:17

green belt along the eastern border as I

1:15:19

previously explained so um I'm not sure

1:15:23

if that uh is satis what Mr Knight is

1:15:27

referring to it is not um as I noted

1:15:30

previously during the former discussion

1:15:32

um this is going to dump people into a

1:15:35

street this is not intended to provide

1:15:37

safe uh formalized passage for the green

1:15:40

belt or retention of safe movement for

1:15:42

green belt users it is intended to try

1:15:45

and um you

1:15:47

know just make a frankly minimal effort

1:15:51

to accommodate the green belt and to

1:15:54

make a Planning Commission uh believe

1:15:58

that they're you know operating with the

1:16:00

various Partners here to actually retain

1:16:02

the green belt and to retain this

1:16:04

critical piece of infrastructure as

1:16:06

noted uh the applicants are well aware

1:16:08

because we discussed this at the zoning

1:16:10

relief request that this that the county

1:16:12

has no intentions of providing any

1:16:14

additional footprint for the green belt

1:16:15

outside of what they already provide on

1:16:18

the riverfront side of the office

1:16:19

building connecting to the emergency

1:16:21

access road uh the design that the

1:16:23

applicants have has the fence enclosing

1:16:25

their project on the Eastern side of

1:16:28

this access road this having the green

1:16:31

Belo across the southern portion of the

1:16:32

track Southern portion of the property

1:16:34

and along the access road would have no

1:16:37

engagement with the residents it would

1:16:38

not require the facility to open up to

1:16:41

the general public and can easily be

1:16:43

accommodated on what is an existing

1:16:45

access road for emergency vehicles and

1:16:48

frankly I continue to be kind of baffled

1:16:51

by the complete refusal to you know

1:16:54

adopt a frankly Common Sense proposal I

1:17:11

think why don't we switch this be or I

1:17:13

can stand up and talk micone that's

1:17:17

fine our only

1:17:20

intent is to take care of the veterans

1:17:22

that need it there's no intention to be

1:17:24

a fair there's no intention to prevent

1:17:26

people from having fun there's no

1:17:28

intention to do anything nefarious to

1:17:30

this Trail our only intent is to take

1:17:33

care of our

1:17:34

veterans this project brings Supportive

1:17:37

Services and permanent affordable

1:17:39

housing to our veteran Community that's

1:17:42

in need whether they are already

1:17:44

homeless or at risk of becoming

1:17:47

homeless or experiencing some level of

1:17:50

housing in security that is the only

1:17:52

thing we care about I'm the daughter of

1:17:55

a soldier my father was 27 years in the

1:17:57

Army I raised a sailor he's currently

1:17:59

deployed with the USS

1:18:02

Washington all I care about is the

1:18:04

Veterans I spent my career supporting

1:18:06

the veterans in cyber and

1:18:08

defense and in big data issues and all

1:18:11

we're trying to do is provide our

1:18:14

nation's Heroes with a dignified way to

1:18:17

live without having hundreds of people

1:18:18

traes through their front

1:18:20

yard we're offering the Eastern portion

1:18:24

that Road completely fine go through it

1:18:27

that's totally fine we don't want to

1:18:30

stop everyone from enjoying the beauty

1:18:32

that is this esana area this is a

1:18:34

beautiful beautiful state I spent a lot

1:18:36

of my time in Pennsylvania I was in high

1:18:38

school in northern Maryland it's

1:18:40

beautiful Commonwealth

1:18:42

here we are protecting the Dignity of

1:18:46

these

1:18:47

veterans the beauty of our veteran

1:18:50

community and I'd like to address the

1:18:51

bringing them together issue as well

1:18:53

when you bring veterans together they

1:18:57

hold each other

1:18:59

accountable did any of you serve on the

1:19:01

commission may I ask no no I'm saying

1:19:03

I'm a vet thank you sir what branch were

1:19:06

you in army army there you go

1:19:09

well so you know when you bring veterans

1:19:12

together they automatically adjust and

1:19:14

they become they fall into their chains

1:19:16

of command they hold each other

1:19:17

accountable it's the rising tide that

1:19:19

raises All Ships as a Navy mom I have to

1:19:21

use a Navy reference right that's what

1:19:24

we're doing here

1:19:25

we're providing the services that these

1:19:27

veterans need our completely whole 18

1:19:31

and 19y old young men and women raise

1:19:33

their right arm and they write us a

1:19:34

blank check for an amount up to and

1:19:37

including their life the least we can do

1:19:40

is allow them to have dignity when

1:19:42

they're struggling to overcome their pts

1:19:44

to overcome the separation issues to

1:19:46

overcome the the self-medication from

1:19:49

trauma that they've

1:19:50

experienced so with due respect sir I

1:19:53

take Umbridge with your

1:19:56

insinuation that we're trying to do

1:19:58

anything but support our veterans we are

1:20:00

willing to work with the different

1:20:02

associations we're willing to find a

1:20:03

solution it cannot be along the river

1:20:06

thank

1:20:07

you there's frankly nothing that the

1:20:11

planning Bureau has recommended or that

1:20:12

we've discussed with the footprint of

1:20:14

the trail contradicts anything that the

1:20:16

applicants just said they can still have

1:20:18

dignity this is not people traing

1:20:20

through their front yard this is people

1:20:23

going a a Trail that's already been

1:20:25

there it will be fenced off it can be

1:20:27

cut off from visibility with Landscaping

1:20:30

you know if you look at the tunnels of

1:20:32

towers website their project in Houston

1:20:34

Texas in where which they're reusing a

1:20:37

hotel for a very similar type project

1:20:40

they're going to have I think 24 Comfort

1:20:42

homes and a similar amount of units in

1:20:44

the hotels the Comfort homes are located

1:20:47

on the existing Dr parking lot on site

1:20:50

with literally the backs of the Comfort

1:20:51

homes right up against the fence that is

1:20:53

right alongside a publicly accessible

1:20:56

Road do those people do those people not

1:20:58

have any of the dignity that the

1:21:01

applicants just referred to of course

1:21:02

they do there is nothing about the

1:21:05

proximity of the trail to them in fact

1:21:07

it gives them more dignity it gives them

1:21:09

Mobility it says you are worthy of being

1:21:13

connected in the same way that the rest

1:21:15

of the community is I don't understand

1:21:17

this insistence that somehow saying well

1:21:20

you can walk along a sidewalk and get

1:21:21

dumped into a road here and drive and

1:21:23

bike through this parking lot is somehow

1:21:26

affecting the Dignity of the residents

1:21:28

of this facility we are not against the

1:21:31

use we are not against the number of

1:21:32

units we are not against Services

1:21:34

provided in here we're basically not

1:21:36

against any of the design of this

1:21:37

project except for the continue refusal

1:21:41

to retain the green belt on site if I if

1:21:44

I may um we we continue to discuss other

1:21:48

projects that we are developing and we

1:21:50

do have quite a number of projects that

1:21:51

we are developing across the country

1:21:53

similar to the this one and they all

1:21:56

have perimeter fence and security the

1:21:59

two projects we excuse me which you just

1:22:02

referenced in Houston the fencing is

1:22:05

going up it's only happens to be part of

1:22:07

a phase two that we're undertaking now

1:22:10

there there there is a fence on site for

1:22:13

perimeter security and we're continuing

1:22:15

the remaining part as part of phase two

1:22:18

which deals with not 24 homes 14 homes

1:22:21

in actuality that we're putting in but

1:22:23

it creates the village and it creates

1:22:25

that perimeter security that's important

1:22:27

to us from an operational perspective to

1:22:29

maintain security within our

1:22:32

facility we're able to monitor the

1:22:35

comings and goings of our our our our

1:22:38

our residents so it is a secured space

1:22:42

that we are deploying on all of our

1:22:44

projects and this has come to be as part

1:22:46

of our study in developing our program

1:22:49

as to how best to create that

1:22:52

Village so that it's a safe and

1:22:54

environment and not set up our tenants

1:22:57

or our our residents for

1:22:59

failure with outside influence that may

1:23:03

come into or in contact with that

1:23:05

perimeter security that is something

1:23:07

that is critical to us it's something

1:23:10

that our residents

1:23:12

have no failure there's no room for

1:23:15

there's no room for failure here so if

1:23:17

we're able to maintain the general

1:23:19

public at a

1:23:21

distance away from private property

1:23:23

which this happen Happ s to

1:23:25

be is something that we we hold

1:23:28

Paramount in our projects to make sure

1:23:30

that they are not set up for failure any

1:23:32

contact with outside uh individuals that

1:23:35

are not vetted and we can vet to General

1:23:37

Public we don't know who walk would walk

1:23:39

through there it's a wooded environment

1:23:42

anything can go and that is something

1:23:44

that we are not in a position to

1:23:46

compromise

1:23:47

in I'm going to let Jeff respond and

1:23:50

then I'm going to go to the commissions

1:23:52

we're not asking to let the trail

1:23:54

through there their project we're saying

1:23:56

put a fence up put a 8ft fence up 10ft

1:23:59

fence up ask for variance for the fence

1:24:00

if that is your issue but that does not

1:24:03

seem to be the issue the issue seems to

1:24:05

be with the presence of the trail itself

1:24:08

not in how it's located across the

1:24:10

property and frankly you didn't answer

1:24:12

the question about how the units the

1:24:15

Comfort Home units in the Houston

1:24:17

project can be located directly adjacent

1:24:19

to a RightWay like you could touch the

1:24:21

buildings from what I saw in the

1:24:22

rendering and how that was okay but that

1:24:26

having a having the green belt run along

1:24:29

the southern Edge and then the western

1:24:31

edge of this which would be much further

1:24:33

away from all of the Comfort homes than

1:24:34

what your other project has shown is

1:24:36

somehow inconceivable I think we should

1:24:39

focus on this project and we have a

1:24:41

similar situation okay excuse me excuse

1:24:44

me I said we'll come back to you oh

1:24:47

sorry because I'm getting back and forth

1:24:49

got to get Commissioners in their

1:24:52

concerns commissioner mckenic

1:24:56

again I'm just I'm distressed that our

1:24:58

input at the prior meetings was

1:25:00

completely ignored uh I disagree

1:25:03

strongly sir you were not being asked to

1:25:05

speak at this time you're out of work

1:25:07

please respect me I respected you in

1:25:09

your

1:25:11

conversation we take the truth I was at

1:25:14

the meeting I know what I said there's

1:25:16

videotapes Mr re brast on hbg told you

1:25:20

exactly what was done the meetings were

1:25:23

held excuse me sir I'm gonna make my

1:25:26

statement please me wait a minute we we

1:25:29

you know yourself you're a lawyer we got

1:25:31

to keep order here you'll get your turn

1:25:34

to respond you don't holler out when my

1:25:36

commissioner was speaking if you

1:25:38

continue to do this I'm going to ask you

1:25:40

to lead you'll get your

1:25:43

chance again thank you Jim again the

1:25:46

point is not that from my viewpoint this

1:25:49

is not a sham game to oppose the goal of

1:25:52

the program that you have and I can see

1:25:55

how it could be viewed that way from the

1:25:56

outside what this is about is why does

1:26:00

the other

1:26:01

49,500 residents of Harrisburg lose the

1:26:04

ability to properly utilize a pathway

1:26:08

and a resource that is very heavily

1:26:09

marketed in our region and used and is

1:26:12

privately funded by donations and

1:26:14

volunteers and groups that support it in

1:26:17

order to support your project what I

1:26:20

don't understand and maybe your engineer

1:26:21

can help me I'm seeing an awful lot of

1:26:23

fill in the flood plane uh I don't know

1:26:26

has that report been done I'm looking at

1:26:28

the plan here it looks like you're

1:26:29

putting about 14 ft of fill if I look at

1:26:32

drawing two of 21 in the upper end of

1:26:35

the site there because I do look at a

1:26:37

hillside that's about 9 to 10 feet I

1:26:39

assume that's been calculated in and I'm

1:26:41

not going to at black you guys are very

1:26:43

good so there's but I guess the what I'm

1:26:47

saying is there's a tremendous amount of

1:26:49

regrading happening on this site as part

1:26:52

of making the building happen what I

1:26:54

don't understand in all of this is why

1:26:57

we can talk about coming along the river

1:26:59

and turning up at the south end at the

1:27:01

same time I don't even understand why we

1:27:04

couldn't come off of the dolphin

1:27:05

adjacent to the Dolphin County uh

1:27:08

property General Authority property

1:27:09

there stay on I'll callon North Side

1:27:12

this thing's cockey the way the whole

1:27:13

city sits but run along the side of the

1:27:16

parking lot Cross grade on that infield

1:27:20

that you're putting the 9 or 10 fet of

1:27:21

fill and catch the sidewalk mid site and

1:27:25

provide maybe not Perfection but a much

1:27:27

better flow that that goes to our

1:27:29

planers concerns about putting five

1:27:32

year-old children on bicycles in the

1:27:33

middle of an active parking lot uh you

1:27:36

know filled with uncontrolled people in

1:27:38

order to you know yes it would require

1:27:40

two or three of the homes to

1:27:42

adjust I know these guys are good and I

1:27:45

know they could make it work so that's

1:27:47

the first question I'd like to have

1:27:49

answered

1:27:52

please yes

1:28:14

exactly makes sense

1:28:19

[Music]

1:28:29

please if you could please read the

1:28:31

grade at the um access road and the

1:28:35

grade at the footing of at the top of

1:28:37

the hill there I'm seeing I think again

1:28:40

this is very small with what we're

1:28:44

given

1:28:47

yep now when I do that math I come up

1:28:50

with 9 foot manam okay

1:28:56

right and I'm not taking

1:28:57

question yeah I'm not questioning the

1:29:00

land devel the you know the the Dolphin

1:29:03

County Conservation District and

1:29:05

everybody else and probably the Army

1:29:07

Corps will get their nod at this and and

1:29:09

the plan will be well and you guys do

1:29:11

good my question just is is with the

1:29:13

amount of grading that's happening

1:29:14

already it doesn't seem con

1:29:17

inconceivable that these units that are

1:29:19

on the top side closest to pendot

1:29:21

couldn't be shoved over 15 feet we

1:29:24

couldn't capture at the river come along

1:29:26

that property in something that that can

1:29:28

be controlled and safe you have that 9

1:29:32

foot grade differential which was my

1:29:34

concern which you've just verified why

1:29:36

one can't cut across grade just like we

1:29:38

do any site accessible ramps um and

1:29:41

again it's not in it has to doesn't have

1:29:42

to be Ada because this is not an ADA

1:29:44

path um and connect down further on the

1:29:48

site and it seems like all the goals

1:29:49

could be

1:29:50

achieved U or come much closer I'm just

1:29:53

saying there are alternatives and that

1:29:55

the absolute refusal to say that

1:29:57

anything can be done uh just uh astounds

1:30:01

me

1:30:02

and uh we we I take exception to refusal

1:30:05

we have not refused to have a

1:30:07

conversation about this important issue

1:30:10

that we all need to

1:30:11

resolve that's why we came up with the

1:30:14

situation along the road it may not be

1:30:16

what uh you you deem to be a solution

1:30:21

but at the end of the day it is a

1:30:22

solution because there is a path along

1:30:24

the street unless you can ride a bike on

1:30:26

a sidewalk you could ride a bike on the

1:30:28

street that gives you access across that

1:30:31

road to Sycamore so there is a way to

1:30:35

get out of that bridge or across that

1:30:37

road to a private road which you have

1:30:40

access nobody can stop anybody from

1:30:41

using that road on a bicycle to another

1:30:45

part of the trail to jump back on or go

1:30:47

out to sore so it's

1:30:50

there and the conversations have been

1:30:53

had with with the folks at the green

1:30:55

belt well I'm well hopefully there's

1:30:58

someone here who can explain those

1:31:00

conversations from the Green Belt uh

1:31:02

during the question and answer

1:31:04

period that's all for now Joe okay um

1:31:09

commission yes

1:31:11

uh do you know how many homeless

1:31:14

veterans there are in

1:31:20

Harrisburg so uh you know it's it's not

1:31:24

irrelevant but it's

1:31:28

most given shelter it's up

1:31:35

to5 County it's up to almost I think

1:31:39

85 and in the surrounding counties it's

1:31:42

probably close

1:31:43

to all

1:31:45

right in a state it's over 900 okay all

1:31:50

right yeah other than that I I just want

1:31:51

to reiterate what Veron said I'm just

1:31:53

kind of disappointed that we're put in

1:31:54

the middle of this uh we we've had

1:31:57

situations like this before where we've

1:31:58

had the developer and and the and the

1:32:01

community turns out very much against

1:32:03

the developer and we what we typically

1:32:05

do is we table those tell them to meet

1:32:07

and come back and they always do uh even

1:32:10

when very

1:32:12

contentious doing contentious meetings

1:32:14

they come back a month later they have a

1:32:15

solution and granted we didn't do that

1:32:18

but this issue came to light a month ago

1:32:21

two months ago and I'm I'm just baffled

1:32:24

to as a why we haven't had a solution

1:32:27

yet but that's all I

1:32:29

have commissioner

1:32:32

M yeah thank you um I I do have a few

1:32:36

questions um a couple just have to do

1:32:39

with the use itself could you explain to

1:32:41

me what a comfort house is and what that

1:32:45

entails so a comfort home is a what's

1:32:49

called a micro home uh we happen to

1:32:52

Define it as a comfort home these are

1:32:54

custom build uh 500 square foot units

1:32:58

with a living

1:33:00

room

1:33:02

bedroom Galley kitchen and a bathroom

1:33:05

all compliant uh or convertible to Ada

1:33:08

if need be they're all accessible we did

1:33:11

speak earlier on on accessibility for uh

1:33:15

uh visitability which all our homes

1:33:18

comply uh and these are unique to us we

1:33:21

we've developed these with quite a bit

1:33:22

of study on on the on the size or the

1:33:26

proportion of these rooms and we believe

1:33:28

that we have the perfect solution for an

1:33:29

individual to live in this home as as an

1:33:33

individual with all the amenities that

1:33:35

they need to live as if they were in a

1:33:38

regular home in

1:33:46

society so the Comfort home is afforded

1:33:50

to a specific veteran and I think we may

1:33:53

have talked about this early on last

1:33:55

time when we met um these are afforded

1:33:58

to perhaps um the older the older

1:34:02

veteran the uh 60y old veteran 65 year

1:34:05

old veteran who may not be reintegrating

1:34:09

into society anytime soon these are your

1:34:12

Vietnam veteran these are folks that are

1:34:14

still out in society looking to find

1:34:17

their footing these homes we depending

1:34:21

on their status honorably discharged are

1:34:24

exemplary individuals they're able to

1:34:28

maintain their their own homes those are

1:34:31

the ones that we are affording these

1:34:33

opportunity they can live here for the

1:34:35

rest of their lives I just add to that I

1:34:38

think it's important to not for those

1:34:40

that may not have heard this already

1:34:41

this is permanent housing this is not

1:34:44

temporary it's not shelter it's not

1:34:46

vagabonds this is

1:34:49

permanent our veterans sign a yearlong

1:34:52

leas to start

1:34:54

prent up to 30% of income

1:34:58

am this is not that's why the

1:35:06

Comfort the the building on the other

1:35:08

hand they're more small they small units

1:35:11

um that was my next question could you

1:35:13

explain how you landed on needing 64

1:35:17

units what is the square footage of

1:35:19

those units the uh the the units that

1:35:21

are in the building are are slightly

1:35:23

smaller roughly around 400 in

1:35:26

change um and they vary because of the

1:35:28

building the way that it's designed some

1:35:29

are a little bit smaller bigger and

1:35:31

smaller than the other but those are

1:35:33

more toward geared toward the younger

1:35:35

veterans the ones that are struggling

1:35:37

that you know they need they need some

1:35:39

help to get them to find their footing

1:35:40

once again uh and be able to at some

1:35:44

point we consider it a success when they

1:35:47

turn around and says I'm moving out

1:35:49

right this is more of I'm ready to go

1:35:52

back into the next step in my life I'm

1:35:53

moving back into society I found a job

1:35:56

I'm able to sustain myself that

1:35:58

particular unit is geared towards they

1:36:00

can stay as long as they have to they

1:36:02

can stay there forever but our hope is

1:36:04

that through going through this program

1:36:06

taking advantage of the services that

1:36:08

are offered to them that they're able to

1:36:11

achieve our objective of getting them

1:36:14

back on their feet and back out into

1:36:17

society okay um so another question

1:36:20

related to the apartment building and of

1:36:23

touching on it but without seeing any

1:36:26

plans of what the the units look like

1:36:30

within the building are there amenities

1:36:32

being furnished inside of this building

1:36:34

is there a community you said that

1:36:36

there's services but how are they being

1:36:38

provided in the space right so the

1:36:40

building consists of three levels the

1:36:43

ground level is where we talk about

1:36:45

these amenities and services so the

1:36:48

ground floor is where our Administration

1:36:51

resides uh as part of amenities we have

1:36:54

day rooms we have a gymnasium we have a

1:36:58

Workforce room where training for re

1:37:01

reintegrating to the workforce is

1:37:03

provided uh we help them write resumés

1:37:06

interview give them those skills that

1:37:08

they gained in the military figure out

1:37:11

how to leverage those back in society so

1:37:13

we have those services on the ground

1:37:15

floor in addition to that there's

1:37:16

clinical service that we provide with as

1:37:19

far as you know psychological support uh

1:37:22

we provide substance abuse we don't

1:37:24

treat it here to the extent where if

1:37:26

it's something that needs Rehabilitation

1:37:28

we will refer to a facility that best

1:37:31

deals with somebody who is extremely

1:37:35

U affected by by the abuse same thing

1:37:39

with PTSD we do treat it to a certain

1:37:41

extent something that has needs clinical

1:37:44

support we provide those uh that

1:37:47

placement in a facility through the VA

1:37:49

that allows them to deal with those

1:37:51

issues so as far as the the the the the

1:37:54

the services that are concerned it's

1:37:55

everything that you would need to live

1:37:58

in a v in a village where you don't have

1:38:01

to if you don't want to uh go out to a

1:38:05

gym you have the facilities here you

1:38:07

want to stay and I know uh Linda spoke

1:38:09

about the Brotherhood that exists

1:38:11

amongst veterans you can you can stay

1:38:14

here you have a room with televisions we

1:38:16

have a uh AV uh setup for large format

1:38:21

screening so we have a screening room

1:38:23

football games and through the community

1:38:25

we end up creating that support that

1:38:29

come in and help us during Super Bowl or

1:38:32

any other you know uh important event

1:38:36

they can have it inside their their home

1:38:39

this is really their residence is where

1:38:40

they live the upstairs and to your point

1:38:42

there their their studio apartments they

1:38:44

have a bathroom each room has a bathroom

1:38:47

has a kitchenette so that they are able

1:38:50

to cook and bake that you can cook and

1:38:54

has a full-size bed for that they uh

1:38:58

they use along with any other furniture

1:39:00

that they need we provide as part of the

1:39:02

Furnishing fit out for that

1:39:04

facility and those are on multiple

1:39:07

floors and each floor will also have a

1:39:09

case manager that deals with the

1:39:12

individual tenants that they are

1:39:14

responsible for and those case managers

1:39:16

deal with their issues with VA getting

1:39:19

them their support figuring out how to

1:39:22

acquire the benefits that some have uh

1:39:25

earned and are not sure how to how to

1:39:28

obtain so we bridge that Gap and give

1:39:31

them the confidence to then pursue those

1:39:33

uh those uh benefits on their

1:39:36

own okay I appreciate that overview

1:39:40

that's a very detailed explanation sheds

1:39:43

a lot of light on what you know these

1:39:45

housing um comfort houses look like what

1:39:47

the apartment building looks like

1:39:49

clearly you've put a lot of thought and

1:39:51

detail into um your establishments how

1:39:54

you operate for the veterans what you're

1:39:56

providing them and what that looks like

1:39:59

um you know as far as the use goes of

1:40:02

providing this veteran service and this

1:40:05

veteran housing um you know this is

1:40:07

clearly very well thought out very

1:40:08

detailed very well well planned um I

1:40:11

don't take issue with that fully support

1:40:13

the

1:40:14

veterans what disappoints me is that

1:40:18

you're able to take that level of detail

1:40:20

when it comes to laying out your build

1:40:23

buildings structure and services but yet

1:40:26

have not gone beyond that to look at a

1:40:29

level of any detail and how you can

1:40:31

integrate it into the community and into

1:40:35

um you know the citycape around it and

1:40:38

the various infrastructure that exists

1:40:42

currently within within this property

1:40:44

space um when I look at a land

1:40:47

development plan I like to look and see

1:40:50

how this plan is fitting into the

1:40:52

greater

1:40:53

Community the greater infrastructure how

1:40:56

it's tying into things and what's been

1:41:00

frustrating and dis disappointing for me

1:41:03

is just seeing that some very important

1:41:07

infrastructure pieces are not being

1:41:09

properly integrated into this existing

1:41:11

the the proposed

1:41:13

development I mean I can appreciate that

1:41:15

but I can assure you that with the help

1:41:17

of our civil engineer and our

1:41:20

understanding of the lay of the land

1:41:24

and most importantly like Linda

1:41:25

mentioned before our focus on protecting

1:41:29

the the the veteran that's going to live

1:41:31

in this community that our Focus so we

1:41:34

we've gone back and forth on trying to

1:41:36

figure out how to balance that and one

1:41:39

thing that we've we we've come to

1:41:41

realize is that we cannot compromise put

1:41:44

any any individual that's in within our

1:41:46

our villages in contact with people that

1:41:49

we can't control like I previously said

1:41:52

um the there's no control on anybody

1:41:54

that comes over that bridge there's no

1:41:56

control on anybody that walks on along

1:41:59

that the uh

1:42:01

Trail uh I'm not taking issue with

1:42:03

people who responsibly ride their bikes

1:42:05

and there are ways because they're doing

1:42:07

it now to get around this area and

1:42:10

continue their Trek throughout the rest

1:42:13

of the

1:42:14

trail uh but that is something that

1:42:16

we've come to the conclusion that we

1:42:18

cannot compromise our perimeter not to

1:42:21

mention that it's on private property

1:42:23

that we're trying to figure out and even

1:42:25

what we're accommodating on the road is

1:42:28

on private property so we've come to

1:42:31

that conclusion to allow

1:42:33

access across that road if you're on a

1:42:36

bike you certainly walk run right

1:42:38

through the through that road and

1:42:40

continue along that road out to to the

1:42:44

remainder of the the roads in town which

1:42:48

everybody rides the bikes on on roads

1:42:50

not everybody rides a bike on a trail

1:42:53

and there are Trails where you go

1:42:54

off-road and you come back on trail so

1:42:58

the circuit is there there there is a a

1:43:02

a way to tie that in that it's not

1:43:04

through this

1:43:09

proper yeah respectfully I disagree with

1:43:11

that um have you had conversations with

1:43:14

the veterans Outreach of Pennsylvania as

1:43:17

to how to tie together the green belt

1:43:19

and their portion of the land that they

1:43:21

have owned and developed and this ption

1:43:23

portion of the land well I mean I'll

1:43:25

allow um Tom to speak uh relative to

1:43:29

their position to with with the access

1:43:32

around the property and quite frankly

1:43:34

I'm sure that he there are concerns that

1:43:36

he has with with accessibility to his

1:43:39

property similar to ours uh we just

1:43:42

happen to be sitting in front of you

1:43:45

with a project that we're trying to

1:43:46

resolve which quite frankly uh helps the

1:43:49

community in many ways other than just

1:43:52

figuring out how this road is going to

1:43:55

tie into an existing

1:44:01

C

1:44:07

yes hello my name's Tom Zimmerman 6526

1:44:11

Plowman Ridge Harrisburg

1:44:13

17112 I am the uh co-founder and

1:44:16

chairman of veterans Outreach of

1:44:18

Pennsylvania uh first of all thank you

1:44:21

for your time we are at the southernmost

1:44:24

5 acres of land it is a private land one

1:44:27

thing I'd want to kind of address here

1:44:28

is that the veterans that we're dealing

1:44:31

with are the one that are homeless and

1:44:34

are at risk these are

1:44:36

not people who interact with regular

1:44:41

people and part of the mission is to

1:44:45

create this uh environment as tunnel to

1:44:49

Towers which we support can make it

1:44:52

better

1:44:53

for people who served or willing to

1:44:56

sacrifice our life for our freedom uh

1:44:59

but part of that process is to get them

1:45:02

healthy as we continue and as you guys

1:45:05

know we've been in front of you guys

1:45:06

before it took us four and a half years

1:45:08

to raise the money we did it we thank

1:45:10

Jeffrey we thank you for dividing the

1:45:11

land to get us to where we're going but

1:45:13

even during the construction process

1:45:15

where we had gates up for the protection

1:45:18

and because big equipment down there

1:45:20

there were people riding their bikes

1:45:22

through the

1:45:23

construction even though the gates are

1:45:25

still up now because the construction

1:45:27

hopefully will start with tunnel to

1:45:29

Towers there are people carrying their

1:45:31

bikes and their signs at say private

1:45:33

property do not enter and I just stopped

1:45:37

three ladies in their 80s riding their

1:45:39

bike who went through our property and

1:45:42

it's a detriment to our veterans and who

1:45:44

we're trying to care for so we cannot

1:45:47

control and you guys can't control and

1:45:49

the green bell can't control who uses

1:45:52

that P piece of property so it's very

1:45:57

important to help our veterans the ones

1:46:00

that have really been struggling to give

1:46:01

them the pride and dignity of their own

1:46:04

private space as we're doing this

1:46:07

healing and the goal is for them to

1:46:09

graduate and move back into society and

1:46:12

live a life of dignity and pride when

1:46:14

you have the general public and it is

1:46:18

private land I don't think that there's

1:46:20

a permanent easement that the green belt

1:46:22

has it has been allowed to

1:46:24

use this piece of property for 25 years

1:46:27

or however long it's

1:46:30

been by the generosity of a private

1:46:33

owner living in

1:46:35

Harrisburg she she could say it's over

1:46:39

done you don't have the right to do it I

1:46:42

think working out a solution that works

1:46:44

for everybody is the best but more

1:46:47

importantly than anything is our

1:46:48

veterans and that's what I think that we

1:46:50

need to consider here is that we are

1:46:54

trying to make a difference and by

1:46:56

bringing in organizations like us we're

1:46:58

going to free up affordable housing in

1:47:00

other areas of the city which is very

1:47:03

very lacking and overwhelming right

1:47:07

now so if I was a city I would be

1:47:10

welcoming U organizations to help

1:47:13

alleviate that

1:47:15

problem thank you

1:47:24

I'm just going to say one more thing

1:47:26

it's beyond me that since the Inception

1:47:29

of these projects and we started

1:47:31

discussion on them there has been

1:47:34

complete lack since of a coordinated

1:47:39

effort when we have instructed multiple

1:47:42

times in multiple meetings to work with

1:47:46

the green belt Association to establish

1:47:48

either an easement a right of way a

1:47:52

coordinated pathway uh revising its

1:47:55

location and we have made that mult

1:47:58

requested that multiple times I mean

1:48:00

when we've reviewed past developments

1:48:02

and plans and it's been a condition and

1:48:05

it's beyond me why nobody sees the value

1:48:10

in a piece of infrastructure that is

1:48:14

important not just to the city of

1:48:15

Harrisburg but to the Greater dolin

1:48:17

Community

1:48:26

you have to

1:48:32

speak I know I came in a little hot

1:48:34

before because I was

1:48:36

upset we have had the conversations we

1:48:39

are trying we're trying to work with the

1:48:42

green belt Association we have had

1:48:44

multiple false statements made about our

1:48:47

efforts part of the reason that I'm here

1:48:50

as vice president of the corporation of

1:48:52

the foundation is to try to address

1:48:55

those issues those falsehoods that have

1:48:57

been stated we are working in good faith

1:49:01

we have had meetings the problem is the

1:49:05

what we have said is okay with us you

1:49:08

may Traverse our private property on the

1:49:11

eastern border you could do

1:49:14

it but that's not the

1:49:16

answer that the association wants and

1:49:20

I'm sorry but that's the answer we can

1:49:22

give and to address the issue that Mr

1:49:24

Knight in all good faith made about put

1:49:27

up hedro put up a

1:49:29

wall I don't understand why it's okay to

1:49:33

block our veterans view of the beautiful

1:49:35

sesana River to allow that

1:49:38

trail on the other side on the Eastern

1:49:41

portion there's a natural grade right so

1:49:44

they can there's a separation that's

1:49:46

natural it doesn't interfere the

1:49:47

veterans won't see

1:49:49

them but on the water side

1:49:54

we're being told either let our let the

1:49:57

trail continue through their front yard

1:50:00

so that they're always seeing people

1:50:02

through the summer I don't know if it's

1:50:03

used in the winter you guys can tell me

1:50:06

but always have people going through

1:50:08

that property that we we can't control

1:50:10

it's not about the the good members of

1:50:12

the green belt

1:50:14

Association but not everybody that's

1:50:16

that's going to use that now open road

1:50:19

that

1:50:20

trail is a member of the association not

1:50:22

all of the people that are going to take

1:50:24

that path are going to be good honest

1:50:28

people not all of those people are going

1:50:31

to walk past and go and and say these

1:50:34

are our nation's Heroes that we're

1:50:36

taking care

1:50:38

of there are some people that will do

1:50:42

bad things we're just trying to mitigate

1:50:45

that you can utilize the eastern border

1:50:48

of the property you can utilize that

1:50:50

pieace we don't have any control over

1:50:53

what the general Authority does our

1:50:56

Engineers are telling us we can't do the

1:50:58

grade thing on the North part of our

1:51:00

property and is the green belt

1:51:02

Association going to buy that strip or

1:51:03

do we have to subdivide that I don't

1:51:04

know how all of that works either but

1:51:06

you're asking us to make massive changes

1:51:10

that may not even be

1:51:12

possible when we're saying you can use

1:51:15

that order and then let's work with the

1:51:17

rest of the community to figure out how

1:51:19

to get to that point we can only control

1:51:22

our peace but we have to secure we have

1:51:26

to protect our veterans from the element

1:51:28

that may not just want to enjoy the

1:51:31

beauty of the CSCO Han and the trail

1:51:34

okay

1:51:35

thank um and uh no other questions at

1:51:39

this

1:51:41

time

1:51:43

Jordan so excuse me so I just have a

1:51:47

statement to make um the city has an

1:51:50

explicit objective to complete the green

1:51:52

Bel I know that that's neither here nor

1:51:55

there for your particular project but

1:51:58

that's in our comp plan and while it is

1:52:02

obviously needless to say you know with

1:52:05

great intention to help the veterans and

1:52:07

that is admirable the city you know

1:52:10

cannot sacrifice the green belt as part

1:52:13

of that process because once that link

1:52:15

is severed it's gone

1:52:18

and as things currently are are proposed

1:52:22

it's

1:52:23

counterproductive to what the city's

1:52:25

ultimate objective is which is to

1:52:27

complete the green Bel we're you know I

1:52:29

can't speak for anybody else on the

1:52:30

commission I can only speak for myself I

1:52:32

don't have any problem with the

1:52:34

project as a whole but we have to find

1:52:38

some type of way to balance this out I

1:52:41

don't know if that's along the

1:52:43

riverfront I don't know if it's along

1:52:45

the east into to the north but as it

1:52:48

currently is proposed it it does not

1:52:52

look like it is sufficient from a safety

1:52:55

standpoint because as Jeffrey indicated

1:52:57

earlier that then dumps trailers out

1:53:00

into the parking lot and then we have

1:53:03

the issue as has already been described

1:53:05

in various other meetings about Sycamore

1:53:07

so that's my

1:53:09

statement thank you

1:53:14

Joe my only question was going to be a a

1:53:17

very practical question that I think uh

1:53:19

was already covered by commissioner

1:53:21

Jordan but do um

1:53:23

do you agree with or at least

1:53:25

acknowledge that the compromise solution

1:53:28

along the Eastern uh part of the parcel

1:53:32

goes into an active parking lot

1:53:36

and where it leaves the

1:53:39

property it connects to a road or a path

1:53:43

through that lot that's defined as an

1:53:45

extension of the road to connect our

1:53:47

road so it's not just a parking lot it

1:53:49

is a thoroughfare through that L okay

1:53:52

all right thank you I don't have

1:53:57

any this is going to be

1:54:00

U long night um I'm going to go to the

1:54:04

public and

1:54:06

um if you do speak I'm

1:54:10

GNA uh have have you speak we probably

1:54:13

no longer than two or three minutes

1:54:15

because I it will go on forever we do

1:54:18

that and I don't want someone speaking

1:54:21

back you'll get your chance you know

1:54:24

you'll get your chance so I'll start to

1:54:27

my left you for against the project St

1:54:30

your name and

1:54:43

address

1:54:45

prob just make sure it picks up on the

1:54:48

camera they do record

1:54:56

be before I get into my bullet

1:54:59

statements I just knew this was a goal I

1:55:02

mean I just couldn't imagine what would

1:55:04

stop these homes from coming in and I'm

1:55:07

going to tell you the truth I just by

1:55:09

listening it's very frustrating right

1:55:11

I've been in the military 26 years and

1:55:14

we get together and we work things out

1:55:17

I'm not going to minimize green belt or

1:55:19

anything else but when it comes to those

1:55:21

girls and guys

1:55:23

you have to remember this now I'm going

1:55:24

to just I looked at a couple

1:55:28

things uh support the tunnel to Towers

1:55:31

found out by a great group of people and

1:55:33

we sat down not even deal with the

1:55:35

bullet

1:55:36

statements when we look at need

1:55:38

assessment and we look at our veterans

1:55:42

for folks saying there's a need

1:55:43

assessment the the American Legion and

1:55:46

the VFW we are on the front lines of

1:55:49

this we are on the front lines when they

1:55:51

come to our door

1:55:54

and and and as hard as it may be to come

1:55:57

to that door and ask for

1:55:59

food we have packages together we do

1:56:02

rechecks and the hardest thing for me to

1:56:04

tell them is where to direct them other

1:56:07

than the Bethesda Mission we have young

1:56:10

men and women that have been in the

1:56:13

theater and seen some of the most

1:56:15

horrific things in their

1:56:18

lives and come back home and tell them

1:56:20

to get over just imagine being being

1:56:22

part of something so big whether been

1:56:25

Afghanistan or Vietnam or or Iraq being

1:56:29

part of something so big and come back

1:56:32

home and be relegated to ah he'll be all

1:56:35

right she'll be all right or just to

1:56:37

think about veterans that come back

1:56:39

home and they were the bread winners for

1:56:41

their family and now they're waiting on

1:56:44

the V8 and you know how slow the va8 can

1:56:46

be and their mother and and the parents

1:56:49

and the children are looking at that

1:56:50

bread winner and he's looking back back

1:56:52

at them he's trying to get his life

1:56:54

together trying to maintain himself and

1:56:56

everything that he looks at where he

1:56:57

used to be the bread winner and he's

1:57:01

fighting then the thought comes to his

1:57:03

mind maybe maybe they don't need me

1:57:06

maybe they don't need me and then they

1:57:09

go up on the third floor in the corner

1:57:11

of the house and blow their brains

1:57:13

out when we sit here County

1:57:17

Commander brother Jackson we are

1:57:20

definitely on the front line of this

1:57:23

I just when I saw it I thought that was

1:57:25

the greatest thing in the world to be

1:57:26

able to house these these young men and

1:57:28

women and like the one man said there

1:57:31

are we're a group of people that have

1:57:34

been together whether different

1:57:36

conflicts or not it's hard for me to

1:57:38

break bread with somebody that don't

1:57:40

know where we've been you don't even

1:57:42

know the smells that trigger my mind but

1:57:44

to be able to come into the American

1:57:46

Legion in BFW and find someone that has

1:57:50

similar things like you and they start

1:57:53

talking and they're releasing these

1:57:55

things and then they find a home but I

1:57:58

just implore all of you folks in here

1:58:01

until you walk that walk or talk that

1:58:03

talk to be in the shoes of them young

1:58:06

men and women that will never forget

1:58:08

what they

1:58:09

saw and should be able to come home to

1:58:11

open arms I don't know the ins and outs

1:58:14

but I think it's a dynamic program and

1:58:17

whatever the issues and causes are we

1:58:19

need to get over that we definitely do

1:58:22

because they deserve that thank you very

1:58:25

much okay thank

1:58:27

you there anyone

1:58:34

else take no no

1:58:37

no oh oh yeah yeah I I didn't mean like

1:58:41

take it

1:58:44

over I don't think go with the

1:58:47

microphone yeah he's going to take the

1:58:49

microphone good evening everyone I'm

1:58:51

Caleb Jackson and I live at 2737 North 2

1:58:56

Street which is close to the house we

1:58:58

discussed a earlier and uh I've been in

1:59:01

Harrisburg uh 94 years I'm also a

1:59:05

veteran and a member of American legan

1:59:07

post

1:59:09

7:33 and I hear this from both sides

1:59:12

like I remember driving carsville on the

1:59:14

belway you know that it was no you we

1:59:17

drove cars on the City

1:59:19

Beltway and I also see

1:59:23

uh the people on the other side uh shy

1:59:27

pooke is intered by the way shy pooke we

1:59:30

have an article next uh February on

1:59:33

black shypoke that was destroyed

1:59:37

1936 never rebuilt you know about that

1:59:40

okay but d m's going to do

1:59:43

that and I realize you have this great

1:59:46

decision but as a veteran veterans need

1:59:50

it seems like the to me the older

1:59:53

venturers like me don't need as much

1:59:55

help as some of the ones in the 40s and

1:59:57

50s my this is like the the ones from

2:00:01

Afghanistan and Vietnam of Korea vir not

2:00:05

but some of the later ones need more

2:00:07

help than the other ones and I think

2:00:10

this community would be a great

2:00:13

idea because it's not just homes and

2:00:16

housing but it's Community he mentions

2:00:18

somebody would be on board to uh advise

2:00:22

U Veterans of all their their rights and

2:00:25

whatnot an as an advocacy more or less

2:00:28

so I urge you to come to a compromise on

2:00:33

this somebody lose a little bit somebody

2:00:37

will gain but I think you should pass

2:00:40

this and and do this for the vengance

2:00:43

thank

2:00:44

you thank

2:00:47

you thank you

2:00:55

my name is Ken stamell I'm the Dolphin

2:00:57

County commander of the American Legion

2:00:58

I represent the 14 posts in Dolphin

2:01:02

County uh you asked where the veterans

2:01:04

were well over 8,000 of them were

2:01:07

standing right here

2:01:10

um Harrisburg where I was born and

2:01:13

raised has always been a military

2:01:16

city um it's a very wonderful military

2:01:20

City I don't need to remind you of the

2:01:22

history going all the way back to the

2:01:23

Revolutionary War and Harris's fairy and

2:01:26

the Civil War certainly of Camp Edison

2:01:29

uh Camp curtain Harrisburg was the the

2:01:33

biggest basic training site during the

2:01:36

Civil War for the union sites over

2:01:40

300,000 Civil War veterans were trained

2:01:42

up here on the hill camp

2:01:46

curtain World War I which my grandfather

2:01:49

served in World War II

2:01:52

uh which my mother and father were both

2:01:53

in the Navy um my mother was stationed

2:01:56

here in Harrisburg during World War II

2:01:58

that's how she met my father I'm a

2:02:00

retired attack helicopter pilot born and

2:02:02

raised down on 19th in Dairy the green

2:02:05

belt from uh 29th Street from Pang all

2:02:08

the way out to Klein Village that was my

2:02:11

my playground growing up I appreciate

2:02:14

that green space

2:02:16

um so um it's my honor to be personal

2:02:20

friends with Tom and when Tom said he

2:02:22

was building

2:02:23

vpa um I knew he was going to get it

2:02:26

done tunnel to Towers has a history of

2:02:29

getting it done you'll recognize the

2:02:31

tunnel Towers veterans they're they're

2:02:34

the ones without legs

2:02:37

arms they have caretakers because they

2:02:39

had traumatic brain

2:02:42

injuries you know I'm I'm one of the

2:02:44

lucky ones I came home and I I've

2:02:46

dedicated my life to serving the

2:02:48

veterans here in in Dolphin County I'm

2:02:51

I'm the biggest donator that you

2:02:53

probably never heard of U over $500,000

2:02:56

from my organization to any any

2:02:58

nonprofit that's veterans oriented and

2:03:02

that's just my own post out in

2:03:03

Linglestown which I've had the pleasure

2:03:05

to lead uh we're very successful those

2:03:08

of us that are have been in business I

2:03:11

was a vice president for pencey Supply I

2:03:13

understand that everything south of of

2:03:16

uh PX stre is Phil you know it's so

2:03:20

there's there's that there's things we

2:03:21

have to adapt and overcome that's a

2:03:23

military statement adapt and overcome do

2:03:26

not let

2:03:28

this

2:03:30

this difference over the green belt

2:03:33

stopped this program we are a a military

2:03:37

city that has always welcomed us home

2:03:40

from the Homeland uh which you know from

2:03:43

Civil War days that's how they got their

2:03:44

start with the with the orphans and

2:03:47

wives and you know I loved when I came

2:03:49

in here tonight that all of them were

2:03:53

had veterans organizations and the and

2:03:55

the homeless and the the children you

2:03:57

know uh they were all nonprofit this is

2:04:00

a great town congratulations and thanks

2:04:02

for your leadership in this town folks

2:04:04

it's hard to lead and because you got

2:04:06

decisions to make like this but don't

2:04:10

don't let I'll echo my brother's

2:04:12

statement don't let this lack of ability

2:04:15

to compromise stop this needed um

2:04:19

project it's it's affordable housing for

2:04:21

my brother brothers and sisters

2:04:23

um the Lebanon dolphin and Cumberland

2:04:26

County make up our 19th District to the

2:04:28

American Legion it's the largest in

2:04:30

Pennsylvania we are the largest with the

2:04:33

number of veterans in

2:04:35

Pennsylvania and this is a great project

2:04:38

this is a great City I've raised my

2:04:40

family here I'm from here I've lived all

2:04:41

my life here except for uh military uh

2:04:45

my

2:04:46

service um so I'll just end there um the

2:04:52

way I'm thinking of and I'll just speak

2:04:53

my mind this is property this is private

2:04:56

property down here I believe this is

2:04:58

access through it and you can work with

2:05:00

pendot and the you know and the and the

2:05:03

County Commissioners to get something

2:05:05

built that's safe there for however many

2:05:08

feet that is I can't see it but we're

2:05:11

asking for there the tunnels to Towers

2:05:14

group is asking for consideration of

2:05:17

that I don't think it sounds

2:05:19

unreasonable um and it's not a real

2:05:22

pretty green space I understand that

2:05:24

it's there it's going to be a a sidewalk

2:05:27

and that kind of thing but the the

2:05:29

amount of veterans that this will

2:05:32

help um is worth a couple hundred feet

2:05:36

of sidewalk I think so thank you okay

2:05:40

thank

2:05:42

you I'll go to the center anyone more

2:05:45

against the project

2:05:57

um Bruce West with h pyamid Construction

2:06:00

Services we served as the uh builder for

2:06:03

the veterans Outreach project and I can

2:06:06

really just speak to going through the

2:06:08

construction process we fenced off our

2:06:11

areas of construction signed them put

2:06:14

danger do on Ure um trying to keep

2:06:17

people out for their own safety we have

2:06:19

lots of equipment going on um but

2:06:22

repeatedly we fences were cut locks were

2:06:25

cut people came walking onto the site

2:06:27

during construction riding their bikes

2:06:29

through during

2:06:31

construction um so it was it was very

2:06:34

difficult for us to even keep people off

2:06:36

while we were building it there while

2:06:37

they were trying to continue to use the

2:06:39

trail and expected to be able to still

2:06:41

use the trail numerous times people

2:06:43

would come through and oh we're still

2:06:45

allowed to use the trail you know it's

2:06:47

shut down for construction they would

2:06:49

continue to to move on and not abide by

2:06:53

the the warnings that were out

2:06:58

there anyone else from the

2:07:07

center I am John Hickey I'm at 3901

2:07:10

pamade dve Mechanicsburg Pennsylvania

2:07:13

17050 um I'm also on the board of

2:07:16

veterans Outreach and uh actually I'm

2:07:20

the person that asked tunnel the towers

2:07:21

to come be our phase two so when we got

2:07:24

people well enough to move on from our

2:07:27

um Therapeutic Community into a more

2:07:29

transitional even permanent housing

2:07:31

space that we would have that and I

2:07:33

introduced them to Peggy um and Peggy

2:07:35

has been good enough to try and make

2:07:38

this safe space in the South part of

2:07:39

Harrisburg for people who are

2:07:41

experiencing homelessness um and I just

2:07:44

want to say you know it's disappointing

2:07:46

to me um some of the misrepresentations

2:07:49

that have been made recently I've had

2:07:51

people from the Green Belt stay that

2:07:53

they had agreement from tunnels to

2:07:55

Towers to the path that's being proposed

2:07:58

and we're clearing here there's not

2:07:59

agreement I've had the people from Eden

2:08:01

Village say that they have not agreed to

2:08:04

let this run down the riverfront to the

2:08:06

edge of their property they said they

2:08:07

would continue to work so some of the

2:08:10

stuff that has happened recently has

2:08:12

really caused tunnel to Towers to have

2:08:14

to issue a press statement about this

2:08:17

that's generated some of the buzz around

2:08:18

today and for me as a veteran and I was

2:08:22

I'm blessed I am you know I have 18

2:08:24

different kinds of privilege and one of

2:08:26

them is when I was in the

2:08:28

Navy there was other countries Waring

2:08:30

with each other and we were next door we

2:08:32

were not at War um and you paid for my

2:08:35

college so thanks for that um you know I

2:08:37

was blessed to get that scholarship I

2:08:39

was blessed to be in the Navy when I was

2:08:41

um and I'm trying to give back by this

2:08:43

service um to VOA and to tunnel to

2:08:46

Towers it is disappointing for me to

2:08:48

hear people say that they think that

2:08:51

that what is a green space and a walking

2:08:55

trail and I've used it i' I've run 5Ks

2:08:58

on it I've done things there the idea

2:09:00

that people who while they were unhoused

2:09:02

people walked by them looked at them

2:09:04

stepped over them and ignored them we've

2:09:07

now giving them a home but we're going

2:09:09

to tell them that people get to continue

2:09:10

to walk by them even if they're ignoring

2:09:13

them that's just not right and what has

2:09:16

been proposed um is offensive to me that

2:09:19

the idea that we're going to say because

2:09:22

the county has said no we're not going

2:09:24

to try the county to give us the bottom

2:09:25

half of that parking lot to get us8 feet

2:09:27

to run across the parking lot we're

2:09:29

instead going to try and take land from

2:09:32

a private citizen or Force Through the

2:09:35

approval process the new private owner

2:09:37

to donate the land to the green belt

2:09:40

Association without regard to what the

2:09:42

liability concerns are going forward and

2:09:44

whatnot um like I said I just I I came

2:09:46

up to speak in support of tunnel to

2:09:49

Towers this project what we're trying to

2:09:51

do for the veteran Community I

2:09:53

understand it's not ideal if you go

2:09:56

across the North and down the road even

2:09:57

that has liability concerns that are

2:09:59

going to need to be worked out because

2:10:00

that road is going to be jointly managed

2:10:02

by all three of the entities there um

2:10:04

and I would also point out that even the

2:10:06

current detour which runs over Sycamore

2:10:08

Street to Cameron down to shenoi and

2:10:11

back onto the green belt um that is a

2:10:14

designated bike trail there's a sign

2:10:17

that says J1 National Pennsylvania bike

2:10:19

trail right on that road so it's not

2:10:22

inconceivable that bikes would go there

2:10:24

you do need to do some work we need to

2:10:26

do something to the sidewalk you need to

2:10:27

cut back the overgrowth um on Sycamore

2:10:30

Street but even that does allow the

2:10:32

green belt to be contiguous it just

2:10:35

isn't as pretty as the

2:10:38

riverfront okay thank

2:10:42

you anyone else from the

2:10:46

center Peggy I I'm sorry I didn't want

2:10:49

to put you on the spot but since you're

2:10:51

there owner I've known you for a

2:10:54

while my name is Peggy Grove I live at

2:10:57

2920 Parkside Lane My office address is

2:11:00

510 north3 Street in Harrisburg I lived

2:11:04

in Harrisburg since uh off and on since

2:11:09

1989 and the first time I drove down I

2:11:12

didn't drive yes I was driving down

2:11:15

Front Street of Harrisburg I fell in

2:11:17

love with this city and that was in 1963

2:11:21

I'm 81 years old my son and I are in the

2:11:25

process of um selling our business um we

2:11:29

are down to one

2:11:31

property um and there's a lot of urban

2:11:34

myths that I have absorbed in the

2:11:37

last

2:11:39

year even before that but I never spoke

2:11:43

up and it was my fault for not speaking

2:11:45

up and putting a stop to some of this at

2:11:48

the very beginning first of all Green

2:11:52

Belt people persons sent by the board or

2:11:55

whatever going way back 28 years have

2:11:59

always come to me and said we want a an

2:12:02

easement that they always wanted the

2:12:05

Front Street property that's the Prime

2:12:09

Property of the entire U uh

2:12:14

tract I donated the land in South

2:12:18

Harrisburg to help the vpa project

2:12:21

go into fruition I also called the

2:12:24

governor because the arpac grant was not

2:12:28

going through and I got him 10 days

2:12:32

before he left office to I found it on

2:12:36

desk

2:12:38

17 to make sure that that project would

2:12:43

occur rotarians we always met at the

2:12:48

Hilton it's the Harrisburg rotarian Club

2:12:51

and rotarians have made all of this

2:12:55

happen put together Ellen Brown who is

2:12:58

not here tonight came to me probably

2:13:01

seven years ago and said she described

2:13:05

the VOA project and that they needed

2:13:08

land and I said let's get in the car and

2:13:11

I drove her down to show her the

2:13:14

property the last deal that we had that

2:13:18

was in um in writing was when Governor

2:13:22

Randell was in office and um we had a

2:13:27

group that came to us that in fact from

2:13:30

from right from central Pennsylvania who

2:13:33

wanted to do a Riverboat gambling um

2:13:36

site down there plus build a a huge um

2:13:41

what I thought was a monstrosity of a of

2:13:45

a um like a hotel and casino but they

2:13:49

couldn't have the casino in on the land

2:13:52

at that time I lived in shipoke I lived

2:13:55

in and I don't know that you know that

2:13:56

no I okay I lived in shipoke I I was on

2:14:00

city council when Oli Rosenberg died

2:14:04

olly never owned this

2:14:06

land Alex grass owned it under various

2:14:10

asundry other

2:14:13

entities

2:14:15

and never did the city have ownership of

2:14:19

any of this land or rights to any of

2:14:21

this land it is private land it has been

2:14:24

private land for for ever since the

2:14:28

Phoenix steel was there and I'm not

2:14:32

going to go into detail here but I will

2:14:34

put something in the paper that will

2:14:36

detail all the history and I'm just in

2:14:39

the process of researching who who owned

2:14:41

what and when under what names Etc I

2:14:44

have an appraiser that is handicapped

2:14:47

that I have hired in my office to help

2:14:49

us close out the balance of of the of

2:14:51

the business speaking of which my goal

2:14:55

is to end this business and at the end

2:14:57

of this year I have provided liability

2:15:02

insurance at an

2:15:04

expense covering vpa not vopa but Green

2:15:08

Belt Etc and the public for all of these

2:15:11

years for 28 years at Great

2:15:14

expense and I asked Green Belt many

2:15:18

times do you have any liability

2:15:21

insurance and they the answer was always

2:15:23

no and they weren't willing to get any I

2:15:26

still allowed them to use the

2:15:29

property I had when I was on city

2:15:31

council I asked the policeman that would

2:15:35

Patrol at at our area that's when I

2:15:40

lived in

2:15:41

shipoke to go down and just spot you

2:15:44

know use the spotlight just to make sure

2:15:47

there wasn't anything going on in South

2:15:49

Harrisburg and naive me me I thought

2:15:52

when we had a camper there I thought

2:15:54

there were campers and probably 50% of

2:15:57

them

2:15:58

were but some of them were homeless they

2:16:01

left that site within 24 hours of

2:16:04

arriving I never had a homeless

2:16:07

encampment down there ever because we

2:16:11

took care of that property I never had

2:16:13

dumping because I had two maintenance

2:16:16

men who took care of the old cam

2:16:18

building which is on Cameron Street they

2:16:21

checked that out at 6:00 am every

2:16:22

morning and at 2 o'clock in the

2:16:24

afternoon before they started and at the

2:16:27

end of their day so that I had that

2:16:30

monitored even though I didn't have a

2:16:34

deal on it or anything this is private

2:16:37

land that I personally have taken care

2:16:39

of Olli died in

2:16:45

1996 and the building the pin do

2:16:48

building he and Alex grass and Bill

2:16:51

tielman and several other and uh Buzz

2:16:54

Rosenberg who was not related to Oli

2:16:57

contrary to Urban Legend um Etc there

2:17:01

were more people involved that were the

2:17:04

the the people who were the ownership

2:17:07

and unfortunately we ended up with three

2:17:11

widows um when it came time to sell that

2:17:15

that property to along with the building

2:17:18

and it was only part of the property I

2:17:20

think Michael can you come up here

2:17:22

please with numbers this is my son

2:17:24

Michael Grove and he can tell you where

2:17:26

he

2:17:27

lives and he's been in business with me

2:17:30

for 30 years Michael Grove I live at 510

2:17:33

North Third Street in

2:17:35

Harrisburg and tell them how many acres

2:17:38

were first sold to uh the initial site

2:17:42

was 12 and a half acres and then they

2:17:43

sold the six and a half acres for the

2:17:45

parking lot and then the remaining 20

2:17:48

were were to be redeveloped Okay and

2:17:52

like I don't don't leave he's my numbers

2:17:54

person and I I'm 81 I am allowed to

2:17:57

forget and I just got over covid and I

2:18:00

spent the summer in bed with eight

2:18:03

different infections because I was on

2:18:06

Cali and I am done with chemo I've been

2:18:09

on chemo for 28 years 28 years that I

2:18:12

have fought and now I have another fight

2:18:16

this is ridiculous it's absolutely

2:18:19

ridiculous as you've heard from the

2:18:22

veterans and from other people sitting

2:18:23

here this project is a great project

2:18:27

green belt is the one being obstreperous

2:18:30

I hate to say this and I I I have

2:18:32

supported green bill for the last 28

2:18:34

years but to require us to give up

2:18:38

frontal property which is the be the

2:18:41

highest and best value of any property

2:18:44

is the prop the amount on the River look

2:18:46

at the the the values of the all the

2:18:49

Mansions along this along Front Street

2:18:52

in the Harrisburg area those properties

2:18:54

are are worth more and evaluated more or

2:18:58

estimated value more because they're on

2:19:01

the

2:19:02

river if I sell this property to someone

2:19:05

that's going to be the coveted part of

2:19:07

that property we have given the green

2:19:11

build this is this is what the project

2:19:15

has has agreed to and be and I'm going

2:19:18

to just mention Eden Village is

2:19:20

Affordable house housing that's the

2:19:21

third portion that connects the other

2:19:23

two and Eden Village if any of you know

2:19:26

anything about the bridge to Hope

2:19:28

project that's on on the hill it's

2:19:31

patterned at the on the same way it's

2:19:34

$300 a month everything's included and

2:19:37

they give them Workforce Development

2:19:40

teach them how to save money so that

2:19:42

they can go back into a rental that is a

2:19:46

a regular rental hopefully there'll be

2:19:48

more affordable housing that they won't

2:19:50

have to go into a landlord an absentee

2:19:53

landlord's housing which is substandard

2:19:57

and I fought against I was served on

2:19:59

city council for eight years and I was

2:20:01

on council at the at the beginning of

2:20:03

this and I'm just going to say one other

2:20:05

thing the urban legend that the green

2:20:07

chair trust had anything to do with

2:20:09

anything green that's public is

2:20:12

ridiculous in

2:20:15

1982 my husband and I finalized our

2:20:18

divorce and Christmas time I bought two

2:20:21

chairs two green chairs from Palm Royce

2:20:24

that's where the name of green Bel of

2:20:26

the green chair trust came from had

2:20:28

nothing to do with the green belt had

2:20:31

nothing to do with any other

2:20:34

project and it became a joke with the

2:20:37

family because the kids hid the hid the

2:20:40

the chairs when they were delivered and

2:20:42

it was like quarter to six on on

2:20:44

Christmas

2:20:45

Eve long story short those chairs have

2:20:48

followed and they're still in my living

2:20:50

room

2:20:51

and at one point I told both of my boys

2:20:53

that there would be a video in them and

2:20:55

that's where any having to do with my

2:20:58

estate would be and that if they didn't

2:21:01

have that chair in their house that they

2:21:04

wouldn't get anything so they were going

2:21:06

to have to live with those chairs for a

2:21:08

very long time so unfortunately my

2:21:12

oldest son died six years ago may he Liv

2:21:14

in blessed memory from brain cancer so

2:21:19

he has to take two ch

2:21:22

now and that's a funny story to end note

2:21:25

on but I will tell you there's at least

2:21:28

20 Urban myths out there about me I and

2:21:33

as long as I'm public I never had

2:21:34

anything to do with Al Bargain Outlet

2:21:36

Allie own built the building that the

2:21:39

second building that they were in on the

2:21:42

on the East

2:21:43

Shore that is what we had to settle as

2:21:46

part of the estate so those people who

2:21:49

think I have all this money because

2:21:52

there's 500 all these stores Etc has

2:21:54

nothing to do with that this young man

2:21:56

and I worked our butts off and I hope

2:21:59

buts is okay I could say something else

2:22:01

which is what I'd like to say but tukas

2:22:05

I'll use tukas that's better anyway we

2:22:08

worked our our self to the Bone because

2:22:12

80% of the properties that olly left us

2:22:16

M as remainder

2:22:18

woman had no rofes now not that they

2:22:21

were completely bare roofs but they

2:22:23

didn't have integral roofs he didn't

2:22:25

believe in roofs that was not part of

2:22:26

his belief system and I know that sounds

2:22:29

funny but it isn't because without

2:22:32

having the roof fixed you couldn't get a

2:22:34

vanilla box to sell it to anybody as a

2:22:38

as a tenant or to sell the property

2:22:42

itself we had properties in I don't how

2:22:45

many properties did we start with 35 35

2:22:48

in four different states and then if you

2:22:51

include the condo in Florida which was

2:22:53

worth diminus

2:22:56

um other than the old cam building which

2:22:59

had been built in

2:23:02

1988 8 88 889 where we started bu 88 and

2:23:09

his Holdings in the pendot building

2:23:12

which only had three three decks this

2:23:15

was the winter from hell this is when

2:23:17

the when when he died the um

2:23:22

um

2:23:23

Bridge the Walnut Street Bridge came

2:23:25

down that was the winter that shipoke

2:23:28

lost six houses three six def fires

2:23:31

three and three because the the uh fire

2:23:35

trucks could not get in to take care of

2:23:39

them and everybody was out of shypoke I

2:23:43

was on city council at the time and I

2:23:45

got the utilities which I know this is

2:23:47

unheard of I got the utilities to work

2:23:49

together with the sh pooke presidents so

2:23:51

that they could get back in in an

2:23:53

orderly

2:23:54

fashion so don't tell me that I haven't

2:24:00

had this citizens of the city of

2:24:01

Harrisburg in my heart I had it my very

2:24:05

first business here was a private

2:24:07

Proprietary School for students that for

2:24:11

women of of that

2:24:13

wasn't primarily for women but because

2:24:15

of the nature and the time the kinds of

2:24:19

programs that I offer offered were

2:24:21

medical assistant and those kinds of

2:24:24

programs they attracted more women than

2:24:27

men and I think we only had like two

2:24:30

male students there while I owned this

2:24:32

the prop I mean own the uh um um

2:24:37

business and first two floors were panel

2:24:40

like this third floor had 28 garbage

2:24:43

cans on it with wheels I I thought why

2:24:46

in the world would I have garbage cans

2:24:48

it's because it rained through the third

2:24:50

and fourth floor so they had to move the

2:24:53

garbage cans another roof that b didn't

2:24:56

believe in so anyway Oli was a wonderful

2:25:01

man he believed in Sedaka which is the

2:25:05

highest and best value of the of the

2:25:09

rules of the eight rules of Charity

2:25:11

coming from the Old

2:25:13

Testament and witches to help a

2:25:16

person get in

2:25:18

education started business so that they

2:25:22

can make them themselves whole first

2:25:24

then their F take care of their family

2:25:26

and then give back to the community

2:25:29

whenever I give a scholarship I ask any

2:25:32

of my students to do those same things

2:25:35

and I have people that I have helped for

2:25:36

the last 30 years because I had help I

2:25:40

was homeless or nearly homeless as a

2:25:42

child and we built our house out of

2:25:44

demolished

2:25:46

houses rags and papers what we insulated

2:25:52

with and I will tell you I understand

2:25:56

not having something to eat my mother

2:25:59

was mentally ill she would forget to

2:26:01

feed us so don't tell me I was born with

2:26:05

a silver spoon in my mouth we worked

2:26:09

hard to make sure that I can give back

2:26:12

things like I'm trying to do for the

2:26:14

city of Harrisburg thank you for

2:26:18

listening thank you than

2:26:21

get to hold

2:26:23

it is there anyone else in the

2:26:26

center not I'll go to my

2:26:35

right thank you yep jerro 1521 North 2

2:26:39

Street Apartment 1 zip code

2:26:42

17102 so I think there is a compromise

2:26:44

but I I want to just if I may speak to

2:26:47

the applicant a little bit about again

2:26:49

the green belt and I think some of the

2:26:51

logic that I believe you don't

2:26:53

appreciate of how nice the green belt is

2:26:56

so I don't know if you've driven the

2:26:57

whole thing but one compromise I suggest

2:27:00

you guys need to get on bikes as a group

2:27:02

and go ride on the green belt because

2:27:04

like if you start up on the governor's

2:27:05

mansion you know there's been tons of

2:27:08

government investment right I don't know

2:27:10

three four years ago the city spent

2:27:12

hundreds of thousands of dollars and

2:27:14

repaved the lower uh deck down by the

2:27:17

river right took all summer right and

2:27:20

the way the green belt and I'm just a

2:27:21

citizen this is just stuff I've read in

2:27:23

the paper the way the green belt works

2:27:24

is hey we got this much done then they

2:27:27

go back to the next Grant and they say

2:27:29

now we're one mile now we're two miles

2:27:33

uninterrupted off the street and you

2:27:36

know I live in the city the city is full

2:27:38

of streets but what we're not full of is

2:27:41

off Street you know these Trails see and

2:27:44

unfortunately where you are talking

2:27:46

about doing your change or this you know

2:27:48

not keeping the path what ever you want

2:27:50

to call it that's like right in the core

2:27:53

of you know you now been off the road

2:27:55

for let's say from the governor's

2:27:57

mansion 10 15 minutes and now suddenly

2:28:00

it's like oh I got to go this way out

2:28:02

into a traffic Zone you know or into a

2:28:04

parking lot it's very very uh disruptive

2:28:08

or it just takes you back to the shock

2:28:11

that you're living in the city you see

2:28:13

and so I think that logic of oh you're

2:28:15

on a path you just got to get on a

2:28:17

sidewalk and go through a parking lot I

2:28:20

wouldn't discount how troubling that

2:28:22

really is when you're right like in the

2:28:24

middle cuz once you get past that pend

2:28:26

dot place and then you go back over this

2:28:27

way then you get up to the Civil War

2:28:29

Museum you know what I mean you can get

2:28:31

all the way around and there are very

2:28:32

there are places where there's like

2:28:35

maybe 20 feet you got to cross the road

2:28:37

and those are then you know scary but

2:28:39

the whole goal the whole game of the

2:28:40

green belt is to get a full circle which

2:28:43

the gentleman said they're trying to

2:28:44

complete it and they've been at it for

2:28:46

25 years so unfortunately the area that

2:28:49

you're you know just making this little

2:28:51

detour and I'm not saying someone it

2:28:53

couldn't be redone but I just think to

2:28:56

come back to the city who's made all

2:28:58

this Investments and things and say well

2:29:00

now we got to go back to the county or

2:29:01

we got to go do something else or we got

2:29:03

to do this it's really impactful and

2:29:07

that's I think the challenge I I I still

2:29:09

think I I don't know what these drawings

2:29:11

are or where exactly but um I don't know

2:29:14

I I hope you can compromise some because

2:29:16

I I think maybe get an alternative

2:29:19

design or something I'm not sure but I

2:29:23

there's so many players it seems like

2:29:24

would set us back 10 years you know to

2:29:26

be honest with you the way government

2:29:28

works it's County government and if the

2:29:29

county saying they're not doing it I

2:29:32

don't know that that's my concern so all

2:29:34

right you get my point thank you very

2:29:37

much no I I agree and and and if I may

2:29:40

address the the issue on that it seems

2:29:42

to me that the green belt or someone

2:29:43

made a big legal error and never got the

2:29:46

easan in place because as a taxpayer

2:29:49

they've been telling grants for years

2:29:51

saying we've got an uninterrupted deal

2:29:53

and it sounds like they didn't have an

2:29:55

uninterrupted deal why would

2:30:01

I order no I I I just I didn't want you

2:30:05

to go there oh okay I'm sorry all right

2:30:08

but I just want to address I'm just

2:30:09

saying as a citizen people have been

2:30:12

[Music]

2:30:13

saying you had you say we know what you

2:30:16

okay very good thank you is there anyone

2:30:18

else on the left uh I

2:30:20

don't yeah okay thank

2:30:25

you thanks uh Rebecca leeart 609 shower

2:30:29

street so I appreciate all the

2:30:31

additional questions that came from

2:30:33

tonight and I think that that was of

2:30:35

value to have those discussions I hope

2:30:37

that those discussions can be brought to

2:30:40

shypoke um I did reach out to Jane

2:30:42

Whitaker who is the president the

2:30:44

current president of the shy pooke

2:30:45

neighborhood association she got back to

2:30:47

me she stated VI text to show folks that

2:30:51

uh she did respond to that email and she

2:30:54

received no response in return and that

2:30:57

yes we are interested in having a

2:30:59

community meeting and Peggy we would

2:31:01

love to talk with you um you know

2:31:04

especially as a former neighbor I think

2:31:05

many things can be true at the same time

2:31:08

right we can want to help veterans but

2:31:10

also have a dire need in shypoke to have

2:31:13

some real and serious and hard

2:31:15

discussions about the current nature of

2:31:17

what is happening and how how best we

2:31:20

move forward I don't think that that

2:31:22

precludes helping veterans it just may

2:31:25

need to be more open to also helping

2:31:28

other folks too when we I hear

2:31:30

discussions about how it's unsafe for

2:31:33

other individuals to come into contact

2:31:36

with the veterans I do understand I

2:31:37

think what they're trying to say maybe

2:31:39

that could be better suited for further

2:31:41

discussion you know in the neighborhood

2:31:43

but um you know I also think as a

2:31:46

neighbor that's a little offensive to me

2:31:48

and maybe that's why we need to have

2:31:49

some some broader discussions because I

2:31:51

am a neighbor and we should want to be

2:31:53

partners as neighbors and so when we're

2:31:55

proposing a project where we're talking

2:31:58

about keeping folks out and I'm the folk

2:32:00

that you're talking about keeping out

2:32:02

and simultaneously I'm dealing with

2:32:04

issues where like I said I can't even

2:32:07

walk my baby anymore uh down towards the

2:32:10

green belt or into the city you know

2:32:14

yeah we need to have some real honest

2:32:15

hard conversations and hopefully they're

2:32:18

good conversations where everyone can

2:32:19

feel like win in the end um all I'm

2:32:22

imploring this board to do is to

2:32:25

consider giving us the opportunity to

2:32:27

have the important dialogue that needs

2:32:29

to happen and I hope that it's a

2:32:32

solution for everyone and we yes we can

2:32:34

help veterans like I said we've passed

2:32:36

off in vpa we want to try to do you know

2:32:40

see good come to I don't think our goals

2:32:42

are all that different we just need to

2:32:44

be cognizant of how we get there and the

2:32:46

dialogue that needs to take place thank

2:32:48

you

2:32:50

is there anyone else on my

2:32:57

right thank you Mr chairman I'm Doug

2:32:59

Hill and I live at 709 Green Street here

2:33:02

in Harrisburg and I'm the president of

2:33:04

the Capitol area Green Belt Association

2:33:07

uh with your permission we have a couple

2:33:08

handouts for you uh if we can distribute

2:33:11

those we I apologize we weren't

2:33:13

expecting quite as many tonight we have

2:33:15

I think 20 copies we'll spread them as

2:33:17

far as we can but uh any anybody who

2:33:20

doesn't get one see me afterward and

2:33:23

I'll be sure you get a

2:33:30

copy and not to hold things up I'll just

2:33:32

I'll just speak while they're they're

2:33:34

doing that uh I'm not sure where to

2:33:37

begin and forgive me if I can't condense

2:33:39

this in two minutes uh but uh at the

2:33:44

outset I I have to say first and

2:33:46

foremost we do support the tunnel to

2:33:49

Towers project

2:33:50

uh we as we supported the VBA project

2:33:52

and as we uh expressed at the July

2:33:55

meeting we will be supporting the Eden

2:33:57

Project when it comes before you uh we

2:33:59

recognize the uh distinct communities

2:34:02

that they serve we recognize the need

2:34:05

for these projects here in the city uh

2:34:08

we think it is wonderfully unique the

2:34:10

different approaches each of these

2:34:12

developments takes to serving uh their

2:34:15

particular populations and so anything

2:34:17

that we say tonight we don't want to be

2:34:19

be construed to oppose the project in

2:34:22

fact we support it and we don't want it

2:34:24

to be taken as an excuse to delay the

2:34:26

project or or its consideration by this

2:34:29

body and by the council uh that said uh

2:34:33

we have been in discussions it's been I

2:34:37

will call it a mix uh we started with

2:34:39

initial in-person discussions uh with Mr

2:34:42

grman uh it uh shifted at one point

2:34:46

where we had a direct conversation uh

2:34:49

with with Matt Mahoney who is the

2:34:51

Executive Vice President uh for tunnel

2:34:54

to Towers it was a zoom call uh that's

2:34:57

the origin of the comment about uh the

2:35:00

the tunnel the towers being supportive

2:35:03

of the relocation of the green belt in

2:35:05

this location uh in that call uh which

2:35:09

where we were joined by someone who is

2:35:11

on the board of the national 911 Trail

2:35:15

uh group um he indicated uh which which

2:35:19

by the way is part of the green belt

2:35:21

through this area uh he indicated that

2:35:23

he would be enthusiastic to support the

2:35:26

trail through the property and I think

2:35:28

his words were if I had to decrease the

2:35:31

footprint of the project I'd do it to

2:35:33

help accommodate that isn't necessary

2:35:36

but that's really the Genesis of uh

2:35:39

where some of those comments came from

2:35:42

since then though uh it's been a little

2:35:44

bit more difficult because it's kind of

2:35:46

been a discussion by proxy and so so the

2:35:50

person that I referred to uh relative to

2:35:53

the National 911 Trail has been kind of

2:35:55

intermediary with the New York office uh

2:35:57

we've been doing some Outreach locally

2:36:01

but the bottom line is uh no we've not

2:36:04

had an opportunity for all of us to sit

2:36:06

down uh face to face and and have uh

2:36:10

some conversation with finality so

2:36:13

reactions that we furnished along the

2:36:14

way were given to someone who passed it

2:36:16

on to someone who passed it on to

2:36:18

someone else we didn't know the final

2:36:20

disposition until uh Bruce was in touch

2:36:23

with me a couple days ago uh about the

2:36:26

uh offer of the the sidewalk on the east

2:36:28

side of the property uh our interest is

2:36:32

in making sure you understand a couple

2:36:34

things

2:36:36

first the green belt the capital are

2:36:38

green belt Association does not own or

2:36:41

control any part of the trail uh the

2:36:43

entirety of the trail is uh in public

2:36:46

domain with the exception of this

2:36:48

private property

2:36:50

uh and two other properties in South

2:36:52

Harrisburg uh all the rest is either uh

2:36:56

directly owned by the city or by one of

2:36:59

our Municipal Partners or if it's on

2:37:01

private property there's an easement

2:37:03

recorded in favor of the municipality

2:37:05

where it's located uh our only role is

2:37:09

to develop maintain uh preserve uh and

2:37:13

promote the use of the trail and to do

2:37:16

that we're a 501c3 is an all volunteer

2:37:18

group uh and uh we've been doing that

2:37:21

for quite a few years now uh and we've

2:37:24

been I think proven successful uh we off

2:37:28

we lay off about $2 million a year in

2:37:31

what the municipalities would otherwise

2:37:33

have to put up for improvements and for

2:37:37

maintenance uh we have generated over

2:37:39

$20 million over the years in

2:37:43

improvements to the trail we have some

2:37:44

major projects going on right now

2:37:46

including a resurfacing of the pakan

2:37:48

parkway uh among other projects so we

2:37:51

have a demonstrated track record of

2:37:53

support of the trail even though we

2:37:55

don't actually control it uh to the

2:37:57

point of the insurance thank you for

2:38:00

ensuring because we have no control of

2:38:02

the trail because we have no Equitable

2:38:04

ownership we can't take insurance for it

2:38:08

uh there are other solutions to that but

2:38:09

that's a conversation for the side and

2:38:12

for another time uh and I and by the way

2:38:14

I was remiss at the beginning for not

2:38:16

thanking you Peggy for uh the allowance

2:38:18

for the use to the trail for the last 30

2:38:21

years we do Concur and it's perfectly

2:38:23

accurate that that is private property

2:38:26

uh we have one signed document but that

2:38:28

is no more than a permission it is not

2:38:31

rise to the level of an easement or a

2:38:33

right of way and so it is by permission

2:38:36

uh in exchange we have done considerable

2:38:38

work in that area uh the railroad bridge

2:38:41

that we rely on we did a full

2:38:42

engineering inspection back in the early

2:38:44

90s uh based on that inspection we

2:38:47

raised the money we redep deed the

2:38:49

entirety of the bridge we actually

2:38:51

Revisited that two years ago did a minor

2:38:53

inspection and did some more

2:38:54

improvements to the decking and then in

2:38:56

the subject property uh we did clearing

2:39:00

uh we did moved about uh 54 55,000 cubic

2:39:06

yards of waste material out of the area

2:39:10

Mulch and so on and so other

2:39:12

improvements so we tried to act as good

2:39:15

stewards in exchange for the permission

2:39:18

that that we were granting

2:39:20

uh to use that area I also need to point

2:39:23

out that we have tried to act as good

2:39:26

stewards as these projects and I'm using

2:39:28

the plural purposely have come forward

2:39:31

so if you remember a couple years ago

2:39:33

when vpa was in front of you we agreed

2:39:35

that we supported uh at that time the

2:39:37

green belt did extend through the area

2:39:40

that's now part of Opa we seated that we

2:39:42

said we will relinquish any interest to

2:39:45

that and by the way I distinctly

2:39:47

apologize for the people who don't get

2:39:49

it and for the people who have Bad

2:39:51

Manners who through the construction and

2:39:53

even continuing to last week and Tom and

2:39:54

I had this discussion uh continue to

2:39:57

violate that and we've been trying to

2:39:59

work with them to do additional signage

2:40:01

posting Dolphin County General authority

2:40:03

to do additional signage posting there

2:40:05

and so on because we do share that

2:40:07

concern it's not right um but to the

2:40:11

point uh we have tried to be good

2:40:13

stewards then and do all of our due

2:40:15

diligence going forward so as soon as we

2:40:17

were informed that the fenes were going

2:40:19

up for the construction uh we started

2:40:22

work with the city on finding a suitable

2:40:25

as possible detour we did the postings

2:40:28

for The Detour we worked with the city

2:40:30

media office uh to inform the public

2:40:33

that the detour was going in place

2:40:35

here's where it's to be used we've been

2:40:36

doing our social media posts including

2:40:38

reminders uh and working with the city

2:40:41

to make sure as best we can that people

2:40:44

respect the the property the VOA

2:40:46

property as well as the construction

2:40:49

site in addition to that uh we

2:40:52

recognized that this project was going

2:40:54

to land squarely on top of the um Trail

2:40:59

as it goes the the remainder that went

2:41:01

through that area and I did bring along

2:41:04

a chart I don't want to belabor your

2:41:06

time I can show you if you want the

2:41:08

specific alternate routes that uh We've

2:41:11

considered and and tried to see if they

2:41:13

are workable uh but in in briefest form

2:41:17

uh the one is the one that's that's

2:41:19

proposed here that we take the sidewalk

2:41:21

on the east side and then extend in

2:41:23

through the Dolphin County General

2:41:24

Authority property along the roadway uh

2:41:27

it can't continue on that side of the

2:41:30

road because when you get to the

2:41:32

building on the North side uh there is a

2:41:35

drop off point there are two driveways

2:41:37

and so there's no way to put a pathway

2:41:39

or sidewalk on that side so you have to

2:41:41

cross over and then have a second

2:41:44

crosswalk to get back to the trail the

2:41:47

problem that the authority has

2:41:48

identified and we have talked to them

2:41:50

about this is that there is no place to

2:41:53

put that

2:41:54

crosswalk that has appropriate sight

2:41:57

distances because of the curve if you're

2:41:59

familiar with it coming this direction

2:42:01

and because of the slope of the bridge

2:42:03

on Sycamore coming the other direction

2:42:06

so that makes that that alternative uh

2:42:08

significantly difficult now we were

2:42:10

smart enough this time not to ask the

2:42:13

Dolphin County General Authority for a a

2:42:16

full determination because the last time

2:42:18

we did that was when uh we had the

2:42:21

discussion on using the East Sidewalk

2:42:23

and then going across uh the county

2:42:26

parking lot and uh that we got a hard no

2:42:30

because that went in front of the board

2:42:32

the reason it got a hard no is because

2:42:33

it would to engineer it properly for ADA

2:42:38

compliance it would take away 43 parking

2:42:40

spaces and Dolphin County was afraid of

2:42:43

what that would do with their lease

2:42:44

arrangement with pendot uh so that that

2:42:47

was where that one happened so we smart

2:42:49

enough we didn't give us a decision on

2:42:51

this but that's the general we did

2:42:54

follow up with them that's the

2:42:56

general uh initial determination we have

2:42:59

from them on that alternate the other

2:43:01

alternate is to come across Front Street

2:43:04

um right before you get to Pand do and

2:43:07

then just follow up uh where we're

2:43:09

detouring now and that's to go over

2:43:11

Sycamore Street and then instead of

2:43:13

going the whole way to Cameron cross

2:43:16

over the street and then find a way

2:43:18

through two private prop properties to

2:43:19

connect with the city-owned property

2:43:21

over on the other side um if again it'

2:43:25

probably be easier for me to show you on

2:43:26

on the chart if you want me to okay

2:43:49

so we're

2:43:51

good all right so here's the tunel col

2:43:54

property here is the traditional route

2:43:56

of the

2:43:57

trail and this is the part that's lost

2:44:01

by the footprint of the F property this

2:44:04

little stub

2:44:05

here the f

2:44:14

s uh this is the pen. service center

2:44:19

lot the boundary line that I was just

2:44:21

speaking of where the initial proposal

2:44:23

would come on this side of the boundary

2:44:24

line and then connect right here for the

2:44:27

sidewalk this is what I say we got the

2:44:29

heart turned down the alternative as

2:44:33

proposed we take the

2:44:39

sidewalk would take the sidewalk out

2:44:42

along here and then back up or back over

2:44:45

to the trail right here and the hard

2:44:48

part is finding where to provide a

2:44:50

crosswalk in here or in here that gives

2:44:53

adequate sight distance so that's uh a

2:44:56

rather significant safety and

2:44:57

engineering challenge the uh County for

2:45:00

its part doesn't want a s a crosswalk

2:45:04

anywhere in its property that might be

2:45:06

unsafe for their understandable reasons

2:45:08

so that causes us to look out here the

2:45:12

other alternative is to take the trail

2:45:14

here cross over at the bottom of uh

2:45:18

front Street and there's a sidewalk on

2:45:21

the north side of Sycamore that goes the

2:45:23

whole way over to Cameron Street and the

2:45:26

alternate would be to take that sidewalk

2:45:28

but then stop right here and you

2:45:31

probably can't see it distinctly but

2:45:33

this is the overhead railroad

2:45:35

bridge and so cross over here and then

2:45:39

come through there's two private

2:45:41

properties here and then in here is a

2:45:44

stub of city property that extends out

2:45:46

from the trail this way

2:45:49

uh the impediment with this is the

2:45:52

vertical curve of the bridge uh creates

2:45:55

a sight distance problem for the

2:45:57

crosswalk down here coming from the East

2:46:00

the peers for the railroad bridge uh

2:46:03

cause sight distance issues for for a

2:46:05

crosswalk here uh it's not practical to

2:46:08

build a bridge a new bridge on the other

2:46:10

side that's prohibitively expensive uh

2:46:13

let alone trying to get permits to go

2:46:15

over top of the wires and the railroad

2:46:17

tracks uh and then uh

2:46:21

so that leaves us with the cycling

2:46:23

traffic on Sycamore Street pedestrian

2:46:26

traffic on the sidewalk both of them at

2:46:29

this point are substandard for those

2:46:30

uses even though you're correct uh

2:46:33

pendot did give uh a cycle designation

2:46:39

to Sycamore Street so those those are

2:46:41

the Alternatives that in our due

2:46:45

diligence we've been trying to examine

2:46:47

uh because of of

2:46:49

the public safety issue with this one

2:46:52

and the engineering issues with this

2:46:55

alternative that leaves this alternative

2:46:57

as the best potential route and to

2:47:01

illustrate it it would be to come along

2:47:03

the emergency road here and then come

2:47:07

across within the sidey yard setback and

2:47:10

reconnect here um we had in in the

2:47:15

initial uh sketch plan that was

2:47:17

submitted as a part of the zoning

2:47:19

request uh there was adequate room the

2:47:22

way that was drawn uh to accommodate

2:47:24

both ways in addition uh the fencing

2:47:27

that was shown on that plan was well

2:47:30

outside uh the perimeters and wouldn't

2:47:32

be affected by uh by traversing in that

2:47:37

direction uh the plan that uh has been

2:47:40

filed now has a few other engineering

2:47:43

difficulties that are presented most

2:47:44

notably uh by the reconfiguration of the

2:47:47

storm retention base as well as the rain

2:47:50

Gardens uh but that's an engineering

2:47:52

question as opposed to a practical or

2:47:55

philosophical question so uh that is uh

2:48:00

the preferred route those are the

2:48:03

alternative routes the issues that we

2:48:05

have in trying to make those work and so

2:48:07

those those are the questions that uh

2:48:10

need to be

2:48:11

resolved what we would like to do is to

2:48:15

have an

2:48:16

opportunity uh to have a face to face

2:48:20

and and we would like to work on that uh

2:48:22

so that we and that's a big set of we

2:48:26

because it's the developer it's the

2:48:28

owner and other interests involved as

2:48:30

well uh to see what accommodations we

2:48:33

could make out of all of this uh that

2:48:36

are going to preserve the access of the

2:48:38

green belt uh I do want to make one

2:48:41

other comment

2:48:43

um and this is from my personal

2:48:46

experience uh I spent 40 years as

2:48:49

executive director of the County

2:48:50

Commissioners Association of

2:48:51

Pennsylvania so I represent all the

2:48:53

County government in the state and that

2:48:54

meant I represented all of the programs

2:48:57

and services the County government

2:48:58

provides and so in that context I worked

2:49:01

with the state adjudant General on all

2:49:04

of the veterans programs uh we did the

2:49:06

work on the um functional zero program

2:49:10

on Veterans homelessness uh I even

2:49:12

worked with former Justice James

2:49:15

mcaffrey on his uh vet returning

2:49:17

veterans peer program uh and so we I I

2:49:22

understand the issues that need to be

2:49:24

addressed with veterans uh I have we

2:49:27

also lobbied on behalf of County Mental

2:49:29

Health and Behavioral Health Services

2:49:32

and so I understand the issues that are

2:49:34

involved with mental health with mental

2:49:36

health provision and the full spectrum

2:49:38

of services that you need to provide as

2:49:40

well as the ones that are necessary for

2:49:42

Behavioral Health

2:49:43

Services uh and taking all that together

2:49:48

in this this context what we know is

2:49:50

that

2:49:51

proximity uh the danger prox the danger

2:49:55

presented by proximity uh I would

2:49:58

evaluate as being overstated and in fact

2:50:01

the opposite is true uh when you have

2:50:04

Trails when you have recreational

2:50:06

facilities in close access uh it helps

2:50:11

gain uh both personal access to other

2:50:15

amenities in the community but it also

2:50:16

helps with reintegration efforts

2:50:19

uh and can be beneficial uh in those

2:50:22

respects uh we also I I have to let you

2:50:25

know and I think this is my final

2:50:27

comment although if you have questions

2:50:29

I'll be happy to answer them uh we do

2:50:31

have fundraising capacity we've already

2:50:33

started to do that uh we are working on

2:50:36

we have already been approved for

2:50:38

several Foundation grants we have others

2:50:40

pending we have uh potential for some

2:50:42

pendot funding and from some for some

2:50:45

dcnr funding and we started that as as

2:50:48

soon as we knew this was going to happen

2:50:51

because we knew we were going to have to

2:50:53

relocate and we wanted to be as

2:50:55

positioned as we could in order to move

2:50:57

forward as a part of that uh we think

2:51:01

there are marvelous Legacy opportunities

2:51:03

here and marvelous partnership

2:51:05

opportunities uh we we would be happy to

2:51:08

talk about additional buffering

2:51:10

additional lighting additional security

2:51:13

uh we also think it would be appropriate

2:51:15

given the uses and and in addition the

2:51:17

fact of it being part the national 911

2:51:19

Trail to do monuments uh to do uh other

2:51:24

um explanatory pieces to help the users

2:51:27

of the trail understand uh understand

2:51:30

and respect and and be appreciative of

2:51:33

where they are so I'll conclude my

2:51:35

remarks there uh and forgive me for the

2:51:37

length but uh I'll be Happ to answer any

2:51:40

questions you have thank you of course

2:51:43

thank

2:51:44

you

2:51:46

um yeah you can

2:51:56

okay the so I mentioned there were three

2:51:59

remaining private properties one is uh a

2:52:02

phoenix track that extends from here up

2:52:06

to the 83 Bridge it's a separate

2:52:09

ownership as I understand it from this

2:52:12

and then the property right through into

2:52:15

here the city line runs about here the

2:52:18

property in through here is uh

2:52:21

kimbob so it's also private

2:52:27

ownership um I'm gonna

2:52:31

to while Jeff to respond to anything he

2:52:37

heard so far oh

2:52:39

well I just hope we can delay the next

2:52:42

meeting so I can get my uh all these

2:52:44

meeting minutes done um no you know I

2:52:47

think uh

2:52:49

you know we've there's been a lot of

2:52:50

testimony tonight um on various aspects

2:52:54

of this project uh and I'm not sure what

2:52:57

the Planning Commission is going to

2:52:59

choose to do but you know I think the

2:53:03

planning bureau's uh position is

2:53:05

unchanged uh you know we would urge you

2:53:07

to if you do take action tonight uh to

2:53:10

include condition number four um as a um

2:53:15

you know requirement of this project

2:53:17

going forward these projects do not

2:53:19

exist in a vacuum you know uh we've

2:53:22

heard them talk about bringing in um the

2:53:25

homeless veterans uh Community from the

2:53:28

region and I think to Ann's point about

2:53:31

talking about how this integrates with

2:53:33

the surrounding environment in which

2:53:35

it's located and frankly the fact of the

2:53:37

matter is it's not it's you know kind of

2:53:40

turning its back on it in the current uh

2:53:43

configuration and um you know I think

2:53:45

when we look at to uh Mr Hill's last

2:53:50

point about um the integration of

2:53:52

individuals back into society um you

2:53:55

know are most of them are not going to

2:53:57

have cars if any of them will have cars

2:53:59

so how are they going to get around

2:54:01

they'll be walking and biking and how

2:54:02

are they going to do that do the

2:54:05

applicants truly feel that having them

2:54:07

walk um up a five foot wide sidewalk

2:54:10

till they hit the property line and then

2:54:11

walk in a street is giving them the

2:54:13

dignity that they've you know I think

2:54:15

that they want to see and when we talk

2:54:17

about how to better incorporate this

2:54:20

project into the community the big thing

2:54:24

that stands out more so than anything

2:54:26

else more than the population is is this

2:54:28

piece of infrastructure that can truly

2:54:30

connect the property to the properties

2:54:32

around it to the city around it to the

2:54:34

county around it and really I think you

2:54:38

know sew this property into the city as

2:54:41

opposed to kind of cutting it out in a

2:54:45

in a sense and so I you know really

2:54:47

believe that

2:54:50

uh I think I think maybe further

2:54:52

communication sounds like it may be

2:54:54

necessary I don't know if the commission

2:54:57

wants to hold that up um but again if

2:55:00

the uh Commissioners feel that they're

2:55:03

ready to take action I would encourage

2:55:05

them to keep uh condition number four in

2:55:09

their resolution U Mr chairman if I may

2:55:12

no I don't want to respond I'm going to

2:55:14

ask the city solicitor for any advice

2:55:17

you can give

2:55:19

certainly uh obviously there's been a

2:55:22

lot of um passionate input from all

2:55:25

sides tonight and I get to come back to

2:55:27

the very dull fact of where the law

2:55:29

stands with these things first of all if

2:55:32

I read correctly the application

2:55:34

submission was August 2nd the deadline

2:55:37

for the other end of this under the

2:55:39

municipal planning code for city council

2:55:41

Act is December 30th with lines up at

2:55:44

the exact same time they have to have a

2:55:45

budget approved uh by the end of the

2:55:48

year so there's time for some reflection

2:55:51

and decision- making traditionally this

2:55:54

board as I've understood it for 10 years

2:55:57

uh when the public input is necessary

2:55:59

sends the applicant back to get some

2:56:00

public input which the neighborhood

2:56:03

representative now here is asked for and

2:56:05

which the neighborhood association who

2:56:06

technically isn't present has said

2:56:08

they're willing to do which is

2:56:09

traditional part of a Harrisburg

2:56:11

development plan and you are within your

2:56:14

rights and in your precedent to send

2:56:17

them back for that discuss

2:56:19

two um there's some there this is

2:56:21

unusual for this board from my

2:56:24

experience in that this is a true

2:56:27

preliminary uh plan as opposed to a

2:56:30

preliminary final plan for the Land

2:56:32

Development the law for preliminary

2:56:35

plans is that within one full year from

2:56:38

its final approval they are back to this

2:56:41

board you know they don't come back to

2:56:42

city council they come back to this

2:56:44

board after city council finally

2:56:45

approves it they have one year to be

2:56:47

back with a final plan so the discussion

2:56:50

doesn't end with this version of the

2:56:53

plan I've always thought Harrisburg on

2:56:56

one hand tried to accelerate the process

2:56:58

for people but what that did is ended up

2:57:01

it made it very hard to deal with

2:57:02

realities for a developer because their

2:57:05

final plan might for whatever reality be

2:57:07

different because of because of

2:57:09

Economics because of things they

2:57:10

encountered on the property so so this

2:57:12

gets to develop and a sort more I think

2:57:15

design of the municipal Municipal

2:57:17

planning code get to come back and and

2:57:19

see this for where it ends up in terms

2:57:21

of final plan so there's time to sort of

2:57:23

reflect on the other side of this um

2:57:27

three there is some ambiguities in the

2:57:29

documents and frankly it just may be

2:57:31

because of the limits of what I have not

2:57:33

What Jeffrey received um but the

2:57:36

Equitable owner is listed as the tunnels

2:57:39

to towers and the legal title owner is

2:57:43

the green share trust but the ambiguity

2:57:46

is that the green share trust owns the

2:57:47

50 Acres but it's but and it doesn't

2:57:50

distinguish at least in the documents I

2:57:52

have whether Tunnels for Towers has an

2:57:54

equable title to the 8p point Acres or

2:57:57

to the entire plan which makes it whose

2:58:00

plan in part is this is it is it the

2:58:02

owners is it the applicants is it a

2:58:04

combination because I know the other

2:58:06

folks came in with a sketch plan in

2:58:08

front of you who are trying to take the

2:58:09

other piece of this and I don't know

2:58:11

whether they are listed now as Equitable

2:58:13

vital holders to the remainder of this

2:58:15

th those are all things that can be sort

2:58:17

of just ironed out

2:58:18

but I'm saying but but from a

2:58:20

perspective of when I go to council to

2:58:22

say what are you to vote on they're

2:58:23

going to need to know things like that

2:58:24

who are they approving what for how much

2:58:26

are they approving are they approving

2:58:27

eight acres are they approving 15 Acres

2:58:29

you know what is it they're approving

2:58:31

and and those I'm sure Jeff is much more

2:58:33

tune with at the moment than I am but

2:58:35

but I'm just noting what on the

2:58:36

documents in the face of them are issues

2:58:38

that do come up and and lastly there's

2:58:40

ambiguities on the waiver requests and

2:58:43

uh there's four listed in the in the

2:58:46

report and I think I think I understand

2:58:49

the planning agency's report while

2:58:51

they're requested they don't seem to be

2:58:53

consistent with what's in this in in

2:58:54

some of the documents where they're

2:58:56

requesting a waiver of the 24 foot uh uh

2:59:02

subdivisions the access road shall be no

2:59:04

less than 244 they ask for a waiver but

2:59:06

the plan seems to show 244 or more so so

2:59:09

those are details to be ironed out I'm

2:59:11

just saying there are ambiguities that

2:59:13

sort of should be discussed and sorted

2:59:14

out um and maybe that maybe this process

2:59:18

will do it maybe it's the final plan

2:59:20

that'll do it but but I I can understand

2:59:23

a development like this which I think

2:59:25

everyone supports this idea that this is

2:59:27

a very important service that's being

2:59:30

provided these are the details the

2:59:31

government is here to sort of figure out

2:59:33

in the front end and that's what

2:59:34

everyone's trying to do their just I

2:59:36

will note for the applicant this is a

2:59:37

volunteer board they come in and put

2:59:39

their time in as Citizens and they do

2:59:41

this on a regular basis bring their

2:59:43

expertise to this and and do it on a on

2:59:45

a on a on a on a very fair and even

2:59:49

basis and so you know uh I think they

2:59:51

should be commended for how they come in

2:59:52

here and take care of this month in and

2:59:54

month out but people bring their

2:59:55

passions to these things um uh I would

2:59:58

say the board is free to to to ask for

3:00:01

the

3:00:02

neighborhood uh uh advice if that's what

3:00:06

they wish they can also not do that and

3:00:09

just make a vote tonight that's within

3:00:10

your discretion as well um the uh you

3:00:14

know but I think you know you have that

3:00:16

those options that's within your purview

3:00:17

both both of those things and you're

3:00:19

making at the end of the day a

3:00:21

recommendation to the city council for

3:00:22

what they must do it's it's it's an

3:00:25

advisory piece of work at the end of the

3:00:27

day and they would value what your input

3:00:29

is in that

3:00:31

advice okay thank

3:00:33

you Commissioners as I heard all the

3:00:37

arguments of course I'm totally favor

3:00:40

for the project but there's our zoning

3:00:44

and other regulations we we have to go

3:00:47

by

3:00:49

I would like to suggest to the

3:00:51

Commissioners to table

3:00:53

this to continue this to get more input

3:00:56

from the neighborhoods and also the

3:01:00

Jeffrey and so forth but I I'll hear

3:01:04

with

3:01:04

[Music]

3:01:06

every Joe I'd be prepared to make a

3:01:09

motion for a continuance table uh and

3:01:12

hopefully next month uh there'll be an

3:01:15

opportunity for these groups to get

3:01:17

together is there a

3:01:19

second I'll second that it's been moved

3:01:22

and second to continue this uh to the

3:01:26

next month meeting and for all persons

3:01:30

to get together somehow some way and

3:01:33

talk to

3:01:35

say all those in favor s by saying I I

3:01:40

opposed extensions

3:01:44

motion if it's of any assistance our

3:01:46

office we be happy to facilitate such a

3:01:48

meeting with the parties of

3:01:57

interest uh uh Jeff um any any other

3:02:02

business uh no okay any anything for the

3:02:07

good of order

3:02:09

Commissioners could I get a motion

3:02:14

forour is there a second second please

3:02:17

stand J

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.