Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council - Work Session 1/20/2026

2:55:10686 summary words · ~3 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The Harrisburg City Council discussed several key municipal updates, including a major 2026 budget reallocation dominated by the Broad Street Market project, two high-profile adaptive reuse housing developments (the former Neumyer Funeral Home and Polyclinic Hospital), and public safety concerns regarding local police cooperation with ICE.

This session highlights how Harrisburg is balancing major community revitalizations and adaptive housing reuses with critical municipal administration issues, budget roll-overs, and highly sensitive debates on public safety and immigration enforcement.

Section summaries

0:00-30:41

Budget and Finance Committee Reallocations

watch

Finance Director Bob Kenny and Accounting Manager Brian McCutchen present Resolution 3 of 2026. They review the roll-forward of 2025 encumbrances, highlighting that $16.5 million is allocated to the Broad Street Market. Special Assistant Antonio details the metrics of Phase 1, 2, and 3 of the city's trash bill forgiveness program.

Vital for understanding the city's capital priorities, general fund cash health, and ARPA-related resident trash relief.

30:41-1:05:45

1332 North Second Street Land Development

watch

Michael White presents the land development plan to convert the Neumyer Funeral Home into residential apartments. Council members interrogate the developer regarding rental affordability (rents averaging $1,300), minority contractor inclusion, parking fees, and protection of the five existing upper-floor residents.

Crucial for evaluating local housing reuse, gentrification dynamics, and developer hiring commitments.

1:05:45-1:45:12

Polyclinic Hospital Redevelopment Phase 2

watch

Greg Hulquist of Penmark presents plans to adaptively reuse the main hospital building into 130 mixed-use units. Discussions focus on bringing a local grocery store to resolve the Uptown food desert, integrating local minority trades, installing trash chutes, and mitigating neighborhood traffic.

Detailed discussion of a massive $30M community-changing development project.

1:45:12-2:02:44

Public Safety Committee & ICE Policy Debate

watch

Police Bureau leaders present Resolution 1 for professional psychological evaluations. Councilwoman Green shifts the discussion to immigration, prompting Police Commissioner Carter to clarify the city's operational stance and non-cooperation with ICE raids. Council members discuss potential local legislation to protect undocumented residents.

Highly relevant debate on local sanctuary policy, federal policing preemption, and community safety.

2:02:44-2:29:02

Parks, Recreation, and Enrichment Grants

optional

Sasha Rose and Kevin Sanders present a proposal to contract Flora Teter Landscape Architects for Vernon Street Park. They discuss updating aging playground equipment, paving dilapidated neighboring alleys, and address delays at Hall Manor Pool due to soil and brown water issues.

Focuses primarily on initial stage grant planning and local park status updates.

2:29:02-2:50:57

Public Comment & Trash Relief Summary

watch

Citizens offer passionate testimony on ICE's impact, the risks of sanctuary city status, and historical housing contexts. President Hill reads the finalized statistical breakdown of the trash bill forgiveness program, detailing exact dollar amounts forgiven across the phases.

Houses critical resident feedback and official city data on the million-dollar trash relief program.

Key points

  • Broad Street Market Dominates 2026 Budget Reallocation — Accounting Manager Brian McCutchen presented Resolution 3 of 2026, where $16.5 million of the $19.7 million general fund roll-forward (84%) is dedicated to the Broad Street Market rebuilding efforts.
  • Adaptive Reuse of Historic Neumyer Funeral Home — Developer Michael White presented plans (Resolution 4) to convert the vacant funeral home at 1332 N. Second Street into 8 first-floor apartments, bringing the total building count to 13 units, with 36 parking spaces.
  • Polyclinic Hospital Campus Enters Phase 2 — Greg Hulquist of Penmark presented the conversion of Polyclinic's main hospital building into 130 mixed-use units, which includes space for a 6,000-square-foot local grocery store, restaurant, and community flex spaces.
  • Evaluating Bureau of Police Policy and ICE Cooperation — Commissioner Carter and Deputy Chief Young clarified that the Bureau of Police has no formal agreement with ICE, does not participate in immigration raids, and only contacts the federal agency when automated detainer warrants are triggered during standard operations.
the general fund of course is the biggest piece of this... of the 19.7 million 16.5 is Broad Street and that's that's approximately 84% of the total request. Brian McCutchen
I'm glad to hear that you heard what I said and that I'm going to continue to ask because it's important, right? Um, one developer once said, 'Oh, it's going to be a beautiful building.' I'm like, 'That's nice. It's going to be beautiful and empty because nobody can afford it.' Danielle L. Hill

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:02

All right, good evening everyone. Again,

0:04

thank you. Um, Harrisburg City Council

0:07

hosted an at an executive session,

0:09

excuse me, prior to the start of our

0:10

work session this evening. Um, so I'd

0:13

like to call our work session to order

0:15

at 5:42

0:17

p.m.

0:22

Mr. Humphrey, could you please call the

0:24

role?

0:25

>> Miss Davis,

0:26

>> present.

0:28

Miss Green,

0:29

>> present.

0:30

>> Mr. Jones,

0:31

>> here.

0:32

>> Mr. Lawson,

0:33

>> here.

0:34

>> Miss RWS,

0:35

>> present.

0:36

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

0:37

>> present.

0:38

>> Miss Hill,

0:39

>> present. Thank you. We have a

0:43

semi-lengthy agenda, but I'd like to get

0:45

started and hopefully we can make up for

0:47

some time. We will begin with the budget

0:49

and finance committee. I will defer to

0:51

our budget and finance committee chair,

0:54

vice president Jones, to lead

0:56

discussion.

0:57

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, we have

1:01

from budget and finance. Um, Mr.

1:04

Humphrey, can you please read resolution

1:06

63 of 2026 into the record, please?

1:09

Resolution 3, 2026. A resolution

1:13

approving the first proposed 2026 budget

1:16

reallocation in order to authorize the

1:18

roll forward of certain 2025 budget year

1:20

encumbered commitments and to reaffirm

1:22

certain 2025 capital project and program

1:25

appropriations.

1:27

>> Thank you. Uh gentlemen, can you please

1:30

state your names for the record and

1:32

please give us a overview of resolution

1:35

3 of 2026?

1:38

Sure.

1:39

Bob Kenny, finance director.

1:44

Gotta get used to the new mic. Uh good

1:46

evening everyone. Uh thank you,

1:48

President Hill. Uh Vice President Jones.

1:51

Um what uh Brian McCussen from the U

1:56

accounting um the accounting manager

1:58

here, budget and finance. Um you have uh

2:03

before you the resolution for this

2:05

evening and it's also displayed in Excel

2:08

format. Uh thank you Jared and Cedric

2:10

for doing this. It it makes it easier on

2:12

the eyes.

2:14

Um so this is I don't want to say

2:17

routine but it's the typical first

2:19

budget reallocation adjustment that

2:21

occurs at the start of the new year. uh

2:24

namely we have uh various encumbrances

2:27

which include either purchase orders or

2:30

or contract they're they're called

2:32

contract encumbrances in munis um I

2:35

tried to simplify this um in column um E

2:40

we have the original adopted budget for

2:42

the new year and the proposed budget

2:45

amendment for each line just reflects

2:47

what the open encumbrances were at the

2:50

end of 2025

2:52

still in need still is is a commitment

2:54

and now they're rolling forward into

2:56

2026.

2:57

Um the general fund of course is the

3:00

biggest piece of this and uh if not all

3:04

practically nearly all budget units are

3:06

affected by this uh proposed budget

3:09

amendment.

3:11

Um if uh Cedric if you scroll down

3:14

please to

3:16

um the bottom of the general fund which

3:19

I think it I think it bleeds over into

3:21

the second page.

3:23

So right there uh it's 19.7

3:27

mil uh.7 million is the roll forward for

3:30

the general fund and that is so

3:34

extremely high the the predominant

3:36

factor there is there is the broad

3:39

street market uh expenditure line within

3:42

a facilities

3:44

maintenance and of the 19.7 million 16.5

3:49

is Broad Street and that's that's

3:51

approximately 84% of the total request.

3:54

Uh just for comparison, if we would

3:56

factor that out, that would leave us

3:58

with a roll forward of approximately

4:01

uh 3.2 million, which is more along the

4:04

lines that you typically see in in

4:07

previous years.

4:09

So that is the general fund and um

4:14

somewhat uh favorable news here too.

4:17

part of the way to fund this budget

4:20

adjustment. Uh last year for 2025, you

4:25

may recall there was a delay of course

4:26

in the state budget process to achieve

4:29

the capital fire protection allocation

4:32

for the city. Uh originally the budget

4:34

amount for 25 was 5 million. Uh the

4:38

commonwealth increased that up to seven.

4:41

And the good news here is this uh the

4:43

payment or the check payment just

4:45

arrived last week.

4:47

uh within the treasurer's office. So,

4:49

it's been received and deposited and

4:51

booked, but it is in effect 2026

4:54

revenue.

4:55

>> That's for fire. Correct.

4:56

>> I'm I'm sorry.

4:57

>> Fire capital fire protection.

5:00

>> So, uh we have budgeted for this year uh

5:04

just the 7 million which we anticipate

5:06

to receive uh later on this year when

5:09

the state moves on the uh the new fiscal

5:11

year budget. But with this 7 million

5:13

that that transacted now the the the

5:16

request the reasonable request here is

5:18

to increase our revenue line up to 14

5:20

million to take that into consideration.

5:24

Um so the rest of this funding relates

5:28

to additional draw on cash fund balance.

5:31

Um now the one thing to remember uh

5:35

about the city's budget we we always

5:37

have budget or open encumbrances at the

5:41

end of the year. In other words, not

5:43

still a commitment but not spent. And

5:45

the thing about Broad Street Market,

5:48

16.5 million is is out there in in roll

5:52

forward, but of course the anticipation

5:54

is we will not be spending that much

5:56

>> before the end of the current year. It

5:59

will uh uh spill over into 2027 uh no

6:03

doubt. So, but we still have to reflect

6:06

what what the numbers say and and uh

6:09

budget accordingly.

6:12

Uh that's the general fund and moving on

6:16

down uh all nearly uh all of the main

6:20

funds of the city of course are are

6:22

affected. State liquid fuels fund is

6:24

there. Uh the big roll forward piece is

6:28

uh capital outlay for streets and roads

6:31

uh projects. Um

6:35

moving down to the host fund. Uh again

6:37

this is Broad Street related. There was

6:39

a $500,000 commitment last year. Uh

6:42

that's encumbered at the end of 25 in in

6:45

its entirety. So that's rolling into 26

6:48

for for budget adjustment.

6:50

Uh the next major fund, of course,

6:53

neighborhood services. Um and it's

6:55

predominantly made up of two main two

6:58

main budget units, the public works

7:00

piece and parks maintenance. You can see

7:03

the lines there as they go down the

7:05

list. Um, and uh, Cedric, if you go

7:08

ahead further down, we'll get to a total

7:11

for neighborhood services,

7:14

which is a little over 500,000.

7:18

And again, the way to adjust for this

7:20

accordingly is to utilize beginning

7:22

ofear cash position or or cash carry

7:25

forward, cash carryover. Uh there are

7:28

some encumbrances that involve the three

7:30

burrows of course smaller much smaller

7:33

amounts but they still have uh

7:35

encumbrance commitments.

7:40

So that includes uh the line detail for

7:43

neighborhood services. The next fund is

7:45

the senator's fund. Um not quite $1

7:48

million is still open at the end of 25.

7:50

And this of course relates to the FNB

7:53

stadium upgrade project which is very

7:56

near completion but I I checked with

7:58

facilities maintenance on this and that

8:01

they anticipate that this will be needed

8:03

for for 26 uh the various vendors

8:06

contractor type vendors involved will be

8:08

submitting

8:10

I believe their final invoices. So it

8:12

still is it still is a significant

8:14

commitment out there for the senator's

8:17

fund.

8:21

And there is funding support needed to

8:23

to do that based on what the cash

8:25

balance is in in the senator's fund

8:28

which includes a transfer from the

8:30

general fund uh to bolster that up.

8:35

Uh that's the senator's fund and the

8:37

next three funds are smaller in nature.

8:40

There there are three of the special

8:41

funds including the blight fund, police

8:44

protection fund and parks and wreck.

8:48

the smaller amounts uh but but still

8:50

they're they have commitments uh still

8:52

in effect

8:54

those three

8:56

uh moving down to the final fund on on

9:00

this exhibit A is the capital projects

9:02

fund uh and again streets and roads I

9:05

mentioned there's streets and roads and

9:07

liquid fuels there's a sharing of

9:09

expense there but the bulk of the

9:10

projects are housed in the capital

9:12

projects fund so there are uh um various

9:16

uh incumbrances and and need to be

9:19

rolled uh for roll forward. And again,

9:22

the general fund needs to uh supplement

9:25

the the um resource uh the asset

9:28

resources in that fund to get it to

9:30

where it needs to be. That's the general

9:32

fund transfer piece.

9:38

Uh I can stop and take a breath right

9:40

there. That's that's the the roll

9:42

forward schedule exhibit A. if there's

9:44

any comments or questions.

9:46

>> Uh just for me, um I pretty much

9:50

understand what's happening, but just to

9:52

summarize for uh the public, what's

9:55

happening here is that money that was

9:57

previously budgeted in 2025. Um the

10:00

remaining of those funds still need to

10:02

be utilized in 2026 uh for contracts,

10:06

budget, I mean, um projects that weren't

10:08

paid for that still need to come out.

10:10

So, is that correct?

10:12

>> Yes. Yeah, that that that's the

10:14

understanding given that uh most

10:16

departments prepare their budget

10:19

uh needs ahead of the the old year

10:22

ending. So, they're looking forward and

10:24

we of course we necessarily don't know

10:26

what is going to be paid by the end of

10:28

the year when we're working on the

10:30

budget in November uh with with those

10:32

final couple of check runs that happen

10:34

in in December.

10:37

>> Okay. Um, I just wanted to do that from

10:40

myself and uh edification for our

10:42

residents and I can open the floor if

10:44

you guys um if anyone has any questions.

10:47

I'll open the floor up and I'll start to

10:49

my immediate uh right with uh

10:53

Councilwoman Green.

10:55

>> Good evening, gentlemen. Thank you for

10:57

being here tonight as always. Uh I don't

10:59

have any questions for you. It's a

11:00

pretty standard thing that we do every

11:01

year. So, thank you for being here.

11:03

Thank you,

11:04

>> Councilman Lawson.

11:06

Thank you. I I do not have any

11:08

questions. Thank you for a very thorough

11:10

presentation. Definitely appreciate it.

11:12

>> Certainly.

11:13

>> Councilwoman Davis.

11:15

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Good

11:18

evening, gentlemen. I don't have any

11:20

questions. Thank you for being here.

11:22

>> Councilman Rodriguez.

11:25

>> Thank you. Uh good evening. Thank you

11:26

for your presentation thus far. Uh my

11:29

question um is kind of around the

11:32

remaining funds from the trash relief uh

11:34

fund. Is that a part of the rollover

11:37

from the 1.4 or the estimated cash

11:39

carryover from public works? There was

11:42

still a small balance left from the

11:43

trash relief funds. It was around that.

11:45

That's why I asked um you actually could

11:48

still see it too, Mr. Brian.

11:52

>> I I think I'm on to what you're

11:54

referring to, but when when you say the

11:56

1.4

11:57

>> right there, I was just guessing that

11:59

that would be the line the cash

12:00

carryover because it was generally

12:02

around that ballpark, the 1.14. Oh,

12:05

okay. Uh

12:06

>> or or does that money get rolled over?

12:09

>> Well, it just just to clarify because

12:12

what we're looking at right there,

12:13

what's what's highlighted really is the

12:15

capital projects fund, which is not the

12:18

the the 2 million relief, right, that

12:21

came into neighborhood services

12:24

as income, as revenue to

12:27

>> uh that that fund, you know, before the

12:29

end of last year. So it it it created

12:32

the ending of course u it it

12:35

strengthened up the cash balance at at

12:37

the end of 25 but the roll forward

12:40

request for neighborhood services is a

12:43

little over 500,000.

12:45

>> Okay.

12:45

>> For for the new year.

12:46

>> All right. Thank you.

12:47

>> Sure.

12:49

>> Councilwoman Ross.

12:51

>> Thank you Vice President Jones. And

12:52

thank you both for being here tonight.

12:54

Um this is a standard procedure so I

12:56

don't have any questions. Thank you.

12:59

President Hill,

13:00

>> good evening. Thank you. I don't have

13:02

any questions around exhibit A.

13:05

>> Thank you. You may proceed.

13:08

>> Okay. Uh just one one additional exhibit

13:11

uh exhibit B and uh the presentation

13:16

here is just a formal reminder to to

13:19

council to be aware of the they're

13:23

they're entitled budget reappropriation

13:27

uh items and they mainly represent

13:30

capital uh type expenditures in nature

13:33

and and more so grant uh expenses that

13:36

are funded by the grant funds. Uh the

13:39

first one up here relates to the

13:42

$500,000 to move to the fire protection

13:45

fund. It's all aimed at bolstering that

13:48

fund in anticipation of the need uh for

13:51

the uh new apparatus uh fire truck uh

13:55

equipment uh that is materializing in

13:58

the new year.

13:59

So that that's to uh prepare that fund

14:02

or or or move the funds from the general

14:04

fund. Uh the next section and these are

14:07

all footnoted of course you can see on

14:09

the left there um this uh item B

14:14

footnote B um and it relates to the Dock

14:17

Street Dam where the city is uh in the

14:21

mindset of the um the permanent boy

14:25

installation project which um there is

14:29

this is sort of very preliminary or very

14:32

very early stages but but But the

14:35

strategy here is that to be aware of a

14:37

uh uh reimbursement agreement through

14:40

the Commonwealth, which would uh work

14:43

toward what what what this project

14:46

entails right now, the the the $2

14:48

million for that particular line. That's

14:50

all contained within the state grants

14:52

fund. The city hasn't uh incurred uh as

14:56

of yet any expense related to this

14:58

project.

15:00

Uh the next in in the midsection here,

15:03

footnotes C through I all pertain to

15:07

what originally was uh achieved through

15:11

the American Rescue Plan Act, but of

15:13

course uh everybody has heard me say it

15:17

where those funds for the most part were

15:19

were transferred to the general fund as

15:21

revenue replacement. Uh accordingly, the

15:24

general fund has funded these particular

15:26

initiatives.

15:28

Um, and I I I believe you're familiar

15:31

with with with most if not all of these

15:34

uh the the various initiatives including

15:36

affordable housing, um the home repairs,

15:40

the senior program, uh the uh demolition

15:45

uh efforts. Actually, that one is nearly

15:48

uh all but exhausted. There's only um in

15:51

in in column E, these amounts really

15:53

reflect what's still available in

15:55

project budget.

15:57

And the two bottom lines then pertain to

16:00

the Hall manor pool project which is

16:01

broken up into two phases. Phase one has

16:04

had some activity uh because it was it

16:08

was it was the original amount for phase

16:10

one was 2 million.

16:13

So phase one is being uh is what has

16:17

been active at this point.

16:20

Again this is all contained within the

16:22

state grants fund. So we can track uh

16:24

the activity uh through uh grant project

16:28

identifiers or project strings in in

16:31

Munis.

16:34

So that that's that piece. The bottom

16:36

piece um

16:38

um is and if Cedric if you could please

16:41

scroll down to the next section which is

16:44

coming out of the federal grants fund.

16:46

That's fund 14. Um,

16:49

this relates to the multi- parks and

16:52

playgrounds improvement project that uh

16:56

is being funded by that significantly

17:00

large uh 13 plus million dollar grant

17:03

that's that's HUD source and is being uh

17:08

passed through from uh from DCED.

17:11

And again, these these remaining amounts

17:13

show the project budget that is still

17:14

been that has been available. There's in

17:16

in recent months there's been heavy

17:18

activity uh on the projects which you

17:21

know on those footnotes identify the

17:24

locations as you can see there including

17:27

the sports field uh reservoir park and

17:29

Wilson playground.

17:32

So much expending has occurred and then

17:35

the on on the flip side of this this is

17:37

a reimbursement grant. So there is

17:39

significant already the uh through the

17:41

grants department they've been putting a

17:43

lot of effort into realizing those funds

17:46

to turn it around to reimburse the city

17:48

which has uh has been occurring in

17:51

recent weeks.

17:56

>> So that that uh covers those sections. I

17:59

can stop right there for any comments or

18:02

questions.

18:03

>> Thank you. Um I really don't have no qu

18:06

any questions. Um I do, but I think uh

18:10

um parks and reccks coming up, so I'll

18:12

save that for them. Um I have no

18:15

questions. And again, I'll open the

18:16

floor this time. I'll go to uh my far

18:18

left and start with Councilwoman Davis.

18:21

>> Thank you. I do have a question about

18:23

your last point. Um, you mentioned the

18:26

federal grant is $13 million that comes

18:30

down from the government and then the

18:34

various departments have to reimburse

18:36

the city. Is that correct?

18:40

Well, maybe I didn't say it clearly

18:43

enough, but it's it the the city pays

18:47

out uh ma mainly to the the vendors that

18:50

were that are involved in these various

18:53

pieces and then that um payment

18:56

information, proof of payment gets

18:58

submitted to uh the department of

19:00

community and economic development. And

19:03

there's also a uh a conjunction with HUD

19:06

too. HUD HUD system has to be involved

19:09

and and the two pieces come together but

19:11

and then but DCEED reimbures the city.

19:15

Um it's just there. It's one department

19:18

at at the state level.

19:21

But uh as um as as Vice President Jones

19:25

mentioned, this this is all under the

19:27

oversight and uh uh workflow process

19:30

through the uh the parks and recreation

19:34

>> department of the city. Thank you.

19:38

>> And facilities maintenance, they they

19:39

they play a role, too. I'd be remiss if

19:41

I didn't say that. Okay.

19:47

>> Uh, Councilman Rodriguez.

19:50

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Um, and

19:52

I don't mean to sound redundant, Mr.

19:54

McCutchen. Um, if the rollover or the

19:58

encumbered commitment from the uh trash

20:01

relief program is not recognized through

20:03

line C through I, where would I be able

20:06

to find that balance?

20:08

What's left from the program? Because

20:10

that was an encumbered commitment from

20:12

25,

20:15

>> right? Uh, but you um

20:18

>> there was roughly still a million

20:19

dollars left from the trash relief

20:21

program. So, I'm just trying my best to

20:24

follow those funds so we know um what's

20:26

left, how many more families we could

20:27

assist, etc.

20:29

>> Oh, okay. Um

20:30

>> we don't call it ARPA funding no more

20:32

because it of course. So, correct. I'm

20:34

trying to not say that but to identify

20:36

it, it was through the ARPA program

20:38

which became the trash relief program.

20:40

So, if that's not identified through C

20:42

through I, where could we get a grasp on

20:44

where or how much left is in that

20:47

program?

20:48

and um through the business

20:52

administrator's office. I I wasn't

20:54

involved in the detailed tracking of of

20:56

of what you're saying about which which

21:00

refugees disposal accounts in thei in

21:02

the system in the main frame are being

21:04

adjusted accordingly. uh there there is

21:06

there was a developed list for that on

21:09

on on the financial side why we're not

21:12

seeing up here

21:15

in that midsection I mentioned ARPA the

21:17

the $2 million in full was completely

21:20

transa uh transferred in in 2025 meaning

21:25

that had it not been transferred we

21:28

would still see it up here but uh it

21:31

happened late last year it was moved

21:33

from the state grants fund where where

21:36

it's being tracked and allocated and it

21:39

was transferred into neighborhood

21:40

services the the full 2 million those

21:43

are the financial dollars along those

21:45

lines um I circle back to what I what I

21:49

commented about the uh the business

21:51

administrators department about uh

21:54

working off of a um of a listing of

21:58

accounts that were to benefit. So I I I

22:01

can't I can't detail that for you.

22:04

believe Antonio is here. Would he mind

22:05

giving us um maybe an update about that

22:09

if possible? Like I said, I don't want

22:11

to sound redundant, but I just want to

22:12

make sure we're keeping a track of that.

22:14

And you know, because if there are more

22:15

dollars that could assist families and

22:17

local businesses, that's something we

22:19

definitely want to project and get out.

22:20

>> I understand what you're saying. Y

22:25

>> it actually did. They allocated money to

22:26

churches.

22:31

Church is a nonprofit business.

22:36

Hello, council. Hello, special assistant

22:39

in the business administrator's office.

22:41

Uh, so yeah, just to give an update on

22:42

the trash bill forgiveness program. Uh,

22:45

we did launch uh phase three. So that

22:47

went out to 578 residents. Uh, so they

22:51

have uh 10 days from the time that the

22:54

letter was mailed to get it back to us.

22:56

Um, so that timing is still ongoing. Uh

22:58

basically they have effectively until

23:01

like the beginning of next week to get

23:02

it back to us.

23:03

>> Perfect.

23:03

>> Um so we're we're getting that ongoing.

23:06

Phase one was also residents and then

23:07

yeah phase two was was churches that we

23:09

we gave back. Uh we did the list for

23:11

churches was

23:11

>> that went through hardship during the co

23:13

pandmic.

23:14

>> Right. And it was basically everyone

23:15

that went through hardship during that

23:17

time and still had a a delinquent

23:19

account. Absolutely. Um we didn't you

23:21

know there was no extra parameters on

23:22

that one.

23:23

>> Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. No.

23:24

And I I was clear. I actually spoke with

23:26

um your office about that uh early on.

23:29

So I was aware of it. I've also stated

23:31

that on the record. Um completely aware

23:33

that some churches that went through

23:35

financial hardship due to the COVID 19

23:37

pandemic did receive relief. No no uh

23:39

fighting against that. Just more more in

23:42

the sense trying to keep a track of

23:43

those dollars and how we could, you

23:45

know, stretch it as far as possible to

23:46

assist more residents in the city. That

23:48

was all.

23:49

>> Absolutely.

23:49

>> No malice behind it at all.

23:50

>> No, no, no, no. Yeah, you're good. I

23:52

just wanted to be clear that there is.

23:53

Yeah. Um Yeah. And if depending on how

23:56

many residents return it in phase three,

23:58

we could get as close as about uh $250

24:01

$300,000 remaining, but that would be

24:03

with a near perfect return rate. So uh

24:06

obviously we don't expect that. So uh

24:08

there will likely be some extra funds

24:10

left over and we'll have to figure out

24:11

>> and you guys will just keep getting it

24:13

out there trying to

24:14

>> we'll have to figure out what the next

24:14

steps are.

24:15

>> Perfect. Thank you so much for that

24:16

answer. Nothing further. Thank you.

24:18

>> Thank you.

24:20

>> Um Councilwoman Ross.

24:23

Uh, thank you, Vice President Jones. I

24:25

don't have any questions.

24:27

>> President Hill,

24:29

>> thank you. Um, I have two questions. Um,

24:33

one regarding the

24:37

the pool improvements you mentioned

24:40

phase one

24:42

um is completed, has been completed or

24:45

is near completion. Can you speak more

24:47

to that or should I wait for parks and

24:49

wreck to provide an update there? Uh

24:52

that yeah that's that's probably a

24:53

better bet. But it

24:55

>> I just wanted to

24:56

>> it's but actually it's just been a minor

24:58

chipping away because if you recall it

25:00

was 2 million for phase one. Yes. But

25:02

there's still uh a little over 1.9

25:05

million available.

25:06

>> Okay. Well, I'll follow up with them.

25:08

>> Sure. Certainly.

25:09

>> Thank you. And while you're here,

25:10

Antonio, I have additional questions

25:13

regarding the um trash bill relief if

25:16

you don't mind. Um, you mentioned

25:20

so I think let me back up. The last time

25:23

you were before us was in December and

25:25

at that time I think phase the end of

25:29

phase one was nearing at that point. So

25:32

how many people um received the relief

25:37

from phase one that allowed you to move

25:39

to phase two with churches and then how

25:41

many churches? So how many people were

25:43

impacted in phase one and received the

25:45

relief?

25:46

>> Okay. So I don't remember the exact

25:48

numbers but round like rough ballpark

25:50

numbers it was about 550 were sent in

25:53

phase one approximately 265

25:59

roughly uh returned. So that's how many

26:01

people would have received the

26:03

forgiveness the first time.

26:04

>> Okay.

26:04

>> Um churches it would have been around 25

26:07

were sent out and about 20 returned. So

26:10

20 of them received uh the forgiveness

26:12

and this time we sent out 578. So, we'll

26:15

have to see how many return by the end

26:17

of the phase. Uh, I think so far we're

26:20

at around 70 have returned.

26:23

>> Okay. And when is this phase over?

26:25

>> Uh, the beginning of next week. So, they

26:27

have till till then to return it to us

26:29

either via mail or in person.

26:31

>> Okay.

26:32

Thank you for clarifying. I don't have

26:34

any other questions.

26:36

>> Councilwoman Gray,

26:38

>> thank you very much. I don't have any

26:40

questions regarding this. I think the

26:41

questions I have have been asked and

26:43

answered. Councilwoman,

26:46

I mean, excuse me, Councilman Loss.

26:50

>> No problem. Thank you very much. Um, uh,

26:54

Vice President, and I don't have any

26:57

questions. Just a a a statement, uh,

27:00

based on, uh, things that I've heard

27:02

from from people questioning, um, if we

27:05

were going to keep up with the ARPA

27:08

funds once we put them into the general

27:10

fund. So, I appreciate,

27:13

you know, detailing that we're still

27:14

following the plan that we had laid out

27:17

um for the ARPA funds before we we

27:19

transferred to the general fund so that

27:21

the public is aware that no, it did not

27:24

just go to pay the city's bills. We are

27:26

making the improvements that um we

27:28

determined uh previously. So, thank you

27:30

very much for that.

27:37

>> All right. If anyone has any more

27:39

questions or comments, um, thank you

27:41

guys for your presentation and I would

27:42

ask that resolution three of 2026 be

27:46

moved to our next legislative session

27:48

for vote and I would ask my colleagues

27:49

to support. Thank you.

27:51

>> Yeah. And um, Vice President Jones, just

27:54

one quick followup if

27:56

>> No, your time is expired. Now I'm

27:58

messing with you. Go ahead.

28:01

>> Clock is um the clock is out. Um, no.

28:04

back on uh the 15th when we were working

28:07

through the final phases of the budget

28:08

process, I gave an overview about the

28:10

general fund. Since it's such, you know,

28:12

significant roll forward, I I back at

28:14

that time, I I I said our cash position

28:17

should be I was estimating uh between uh

28:21

21.5 and 22 million. And of course, now

28:25

that the the old year has been closed

28:26

and we're underway with the new year,

28:28

the general fund's cash position at the

28:30

end of 2025 is 14.4 4 million. So had

28:35

the capital fire protection

28:37

materialized, that would have been

28:39

another 7 million. It would have brought

28:40

it up to kind of what we were expecting

28:43

uh for year end. But I I just thought

28:46

that would be a nice uh tiein to what we

28:48

proposed this evening for, you know,

28:50

increasing that revenue.

28:52

>> That's weird. That number is the same as

28:54

for the broad street market that

28:56

>> 14.4 exact number, isn't it?

28:59

>> Oh, it's uh it's close. that budget

29:01

adjustment that was done in in the prior

29:04

year.

29:04

>> Yeah. All right. Thank you, guys.

29:06

>> Very good.

29:06

>> Yep.

29:07

>> Thank you,

29:08

>> President Hill.

29:09

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Next,

29:12

we have the business of the Community

29:14

and Economic Development Committee. I

29:17

will defer to our community and economic

29:19

development committee chair, Councilman

29:22

Lawson, to lead discussion.

29:26

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Um

29:30

u Mr. Humphrey, could you please read uh

29:34

resolution for 2026 into the record?

29:39

>> Yes. Resolution 4 of 2026, a resolution

29:42

approving the preliminary/final land

29:45

development plan for 1332 North Second

29:47

Street, submitted by Adam Brenamman of

29:50

Brenamman Properties LLC to expand the

29:52

existing non-conforming multif family

29:54

dwelling use on site by converting space

29:57

occupied by the former funeral home

29:58

funeral home and associated site and

30:01

access improvements.

30:03

>> Thank you. And um Mr. tonight if you

30:06

could uh expound on uh what we have here

30:09

in this resolution so that we have

30:11

information for council.

30:12

>> Uh sure. As uh Cedric noted, uh this is

30:15

a proposal uh to expand an existing uh

30:18

multif family dwelling at 1332 North

30:21

Second Street. Uh the property is or was

30:24

uh the New Meire Funeral Home. Uh so it

30:26

was a funeral home on the first floor

30:28

and there were five apartments above it.

30:30

Um and the current proposal uh involves

30:34

um establishing uh eight units in uh the

30:37

first floor and uh which is a bit more

30:39

of a sprawling than the upper floors of

30:41

the of the building uh for a total of I

30:44

believe uh 12 or sorry 13 overall um

30:48

apartment units in the building. Um the

30:51

uh I believe the new meer funeral home

30:54

uh exited the uh property sometime in

30:57

the middle of last year. So, the

30:58

property has been vacant for a little

31:00

bit. Um, and uh the applicants came

31:02

through uh for both the zoning relief

31:05

necessary to expand the non-conforming

31:06

use of the multif family uh dwelling.

31:09

Um, and uh I believe that was the only

31:12

zoning relief they needed. Um, there is

31:14

a large accessory surface parking lot on

31:16

site uh that's just to the uh south of

31:19

the property that has I think in the

31:21

neighborhood of 35 spaces. so they have

31:23

enough off- streetet parking uh for uh

31:26

any tenants or their guests of the

31:28

property. Uh and um overall uh this is a

31:33

fairly straightforward proposal for

31:34

reuse of the funeral home. Um you know

31:37

they've uh there are it seems to be the

31:42

uh most reasonable uh reuse for this

31:44

space as opposed to something else like

31:46

I don't know convenience store,

31:47

restaurant or something like that. And

31:49

as council knows, you know, the

31:50

provision of um housing helps put a

31:53

downward pressure on uh the housing

31:55

costs in the city here. So, more housing

31:56

units on our inventory are always

31:58

helpful uh to help address that. So, uh

32:01

with that being said, the planning

32:05

commission uh recommended that city

32:08

council approved the request with the

32:09

following conditions. Uh any exterior

32:11

alterations to the property must be

32:13

submitted for review by the city's

32:14

historic preservation specialist and may

32:16

require har approval of of a certificate

32:18

of appropriateness application. Um and

32:21

the applicant must coordinate with the

32:22

department of public works regarding the

32:24

size, location, and screening of any

32:26

required refuge containers. Uh planning

32:28

bureau recommends the applicant consider

32:29

eventually consolidating all refuge

32:31

storage and access in the existing

32:33

carport along the CER street frontage of

32:35

the building. I know during the planning

32:37

commission meeting they had indicated

32:39

that they uh may be looking at some

32:41

other alternatives and um I think uh in

32:44

their coordination with the department

32:45

of public works they may in fact tell

32:47

them that they need a dumpster to be

32:48

placed in the um in the on-site parking

32:50

lot. So uh we leave it up to the

32:52

applicant to work with um department of

32:54

public works to find the best solution

32:55

uh in that case. Uh the planning

32:57

commission recommends city council

32:58

approved the request for the following

33:00

reasons. The adapter for use of a vacant

33:02

and underutilized funeral home into

33:04

apartments represents a sensible

33:05

expansion of the existing multif family

33:07

dwelling use on site and the project can

33:09

adequately address the primary concern

33:10

regarding such proposals specific

33:13

specifically the provision of off

33:15

streetet parking for tenants and their

33:16

guests. Uh other conversions of former

33:19

commercial spaces elsewhere in the city

33:20

have demonstrated such projects do not

33:22

adversely impact the neighborhoods in

33:23

which they are located and often help

33:25

catalyze other improvements in those

33:26

communities. And finally, the proposed

33:28

redevelopment will add new residents to

33:30

the neighborhood to activate the street

33:31

on nights and weekends and grow customer

33:33

base to support local businesses and

33:35

will provide additional units to the

33:37

Midtown housing inventory. Uh, and with

33:39

that, um, I'll let the applicant

33:41

introduce themselves.

33:45

>> Council, my name is Michael White, um,

33:47

director of acquisitions and development

33:49

for Brenamman Group. Happy to be here.

33:50

Thank you for hearing our proposal.

33:53

Um, I could Would you like me to to

33:57

continue with the description of the

33:58

project or

34:00

>> Yes, please.

34:01

>> Okay. Um, so some of the facts, uh, Jeff

34:05

already noted, but it's an existing uh,

34:08

8,500 square foot building. Um, there is

34:11

a 5,000 square foot commercial space.

34:13

Um, if I could I could clarify, it's

34:15

being it's in light use right now. the

34:17

the current operator of the New Meire

34:20

Funeral Home is is doing sparse services

34:22

there and is is planning to to uh to

34:26

cease operations. Um above it there are

34:29

five existing apartment units. Um and

34:33

then in addition to the building there

34:35

is uh 35 parking spaces. So has a really

34:39

sizable uh parking lot and a larger lot

34:42

um in general almost a half acre. Um,

34:46

you know, with the sale, there is an

34:47

additional surface parking lot, uh, 122

34:50

Calder Street. Um, everything that, um,

34:54

you know, Jeff mentioned in terms of,

34:56

uh, of proposals for improvements that

34:57

we are, we are open to. The one the one

34:59

question that we did have in terms of

35:00

refu we're open to working with public

35:04

works to find, you know, the best

35:05

solution to consolidate trash in a way

35:07

that that doesn't um, you know, expose

35:09

residents or the, you know, the public

35:11

in a way that's that's unsettling. Um we

35:14

have uh uh we're proposing or we're

35:17

approved for eight units in the existing

35:20

funeral home space. Um we have uh a

35:24

great team. We're working with with CDA

35:25

Dawson Architects uh on the project. Uh

35:28

we're working with Inen Co. for the

35:30

construction uh Midtown Property

35:32

Management to to manage once it's

35:34

stabilized. Um we have a proposed

35:39

loan construction closing date. um

35:42

probably the middle of March, but our um

35:45

you know our final uh deadline for that

35:48

or what our goal would be would be by

35:49

the end of March. Um we can commence uh

35:53

construction after you know permit

35:54

feedback um probably about 35 to 45 days

35:58

after that. And uh we hope that we have

36:01

a very conservative timeline just given

36:03

our prior experience of of an

36:04

eight-month uh construction period. Um

36:07

and then thereafter a two to to four

36:10

month stabilization and lease. Um we're

36:13

we're really excited about the project.

36:15

Um we think that it's a it's a unique

36:17

building. It's a unique site. We hope to

36:18

make it a, you know, a wonderful

36:20

addition to the community and, you know,

36:21

add housing units. Um, and, you know,

36:24

looking forward to questions and

36:26

prepared to to help fill in any details.

36:29

Thank you.

36:30

>> Thank you very much, Mr. White. Um,

36:33

thank you. You answered one of my

36:35

questions was just making sure that you

36:37

had the uh the financing in place

36:39

because we see many people that come

36:40

before us

36:41

>> and we approve the the deal and then

36:44

things just don't happen. So, love that

36:46

you you already have that duck in a row.

36:49

Um, one question I would have for you is

36:52

uh you're using Inch and Co. as your

36:54

your general contractor. Do you have any

36:56

say um if you're as if you are able to

37:00

work with any of our um uh diverse uh

37:04

minority businesses in in the area in

37:06

the construction of this this project or

37:08

is that completely in the hand of your

37:11

general contractor?

37:12

>> Uh it's something that I'd be I'd be

37:14

happy to talk. We have an upcoming

37:15

development meeting here on Thursday. Um

37:18

and we're going to learn more about um

37:20

the subcontractor base and and the

37:22

people that the third parties that I

37:23

inch wants to work with. So um if I

37:25

could loop in with you, I'd be happy to

37:27

to receive a list of referrals. If you

37:29

have um contractors in mind, we

37:31

definitely um would be open to talking

37:33

to an about that and and seeing, you

37:35

know, how that can work with their with

37:37

their project scope and the workflow. So

37:39

absolutely open to that.

37:41

>> Okay, great. That's um

37:44

one question. One last question I have

37:46

and and this is just for my own

37:48

information.

37:49

>> I'm sorry if I could just add that that

37:51

that we do hope to be able to to GC uh

37:54

projects in the future and have more

37:55

flexibility. That's something that we're

37:57

that we're building up to um and we can

37:59

have a little bit more autonomy over the

38:01

over that process and then that would

38:02

you know empower us even more to to

38:04

consider um uh contractors independent

38:08

from you know GC controller

38:09

consideration. So sorry to interrupt.

38:10

No, no, that's fine. And and the reason

38:12

I bring that up, uh looking for like

38:14

more the the minority and womenowned

38:16

contractors, it it's basically to help

38:18

um improve uh the life of many of our

38:22

citizens. Um, basically when we uh are

38:27

intentional on on hiring these people,

38:29

we're we're getting people that will one

38:31

a be able to to move into your your

38:34

project because they have a a great

38:36

paying job and and then also we're um

38:38

hiring we're we're hiring companies that

38:40

are going to hire people that um other

38:43

companies may not look to hire because

38:45

they they don't understand necessarily

38:47

that person's background or that

38:49

person's um uh lifestyle where you have

38:53

of a more diverse um contractor group,

38:56

you'll you'll get more people that will

38:58

hire uh people that

39:01

uh others may look at and and not think

39:03

that they're uh appropriate for a job.

39:06

So, just keeping a an open mind on on

39:09

that when you do uh work as the general

39:11

contra um as your as your uh as the

39:14

general, that would be that would be

39:15

great. Um and and then the the last

39:18

question that I have is just is there

39:20

any type of environmental mitigation

39:22

that has to come when you're um

39:24

converting uh a funeral home to a a

39:27

residential unit because I'm not certain

39:28

of different chemicals that may be

39:30

present in in the process. Yeah, that

39:33

was a big um when we were assessing the

39:36

site and and and working with the the

39:38

seller and the funeral, that was a big

39:39

question that that I had and and he's

39:41

going through

39:43

um the appropriate process with I'm not

39:46

ex, you know, totally familiar with the

39:47

regulatory bodies that would supervise

39:49

the the dissolution of the of the

39:51

funeral home. Um and that's actually

39:52

part of the

39:54

>> the um the sale and the escrow and that

39:56

what the Mr. Bitner the seller that he's

39:59

going through and we're giving him time

40:00

to to do that appropriately. So that's

40:03

that's his um under his control and his

40:06

objective and and we you know we've

40:08

talked to him about that a lot just from

40:10

the standpoint that we allow a window

40:11

for that to happen appropriately. So

40:13

that's um but in terms of um the

40:16

building itself and the conversion

40:19

>> um you know we have already mapped the

40:21

sewer system. Um we've had a laser scan

40:24

of the building. Um we've had our

40:25

subcontractors in and to assess any

40:28

environmental hazards in terms of like

40:29

the disturbance of you know um demoing

40:32

the building and the existing layout as

40:35

part of the conversion. So that's

40:36

something that that that we have our eye

40:37

on and there's been prior renovations to

40:40

the building. So we think that it's it's

40:42

in it's in great shape to to be to be

40:45

converted again, I would say. And um

40:47

we're we're satisfied, you know, from a

40:49

safety standpoint.

40:51

>> Okay, great. Thank you very much. That's

40:53

everything that I have as as far as a

40:55

question. I'm going to just go to my

40:58

immediate left here and um Councilwoman

41:01

Green, do you have any questions?

41:02

>> Thank you very much. Thank you,

41:04

gentlemen, for being here tonight. Uh I

41:05

think it was a pretty thorough

41:06

presentation, so I don't have any

41:07

questions. Thank you,

41:11

>> Vice President Jones. Any questions?

41:13

>> Yes. Thank you. Thank you, uh for being

41:15

here and your presentation and being

41:17

willing to do a project in our beautiful

41:19

city of Harrisburg.

41:21

>> Many more to come. Yeah. Uh, I'll just

41:24

reiterate what, uh, Councilman Ross, I

41:26

mean, Lawson has said. Um, for me, I

41:28

won't go into too many things, but I'll

41:30

just ask two questions. And something

41:32

that I'm very passionate about is is

41:34

ensuring that, um, local people in the

41:37

city of Harrisburg, I won't use

41:38

diversity, equity, and inclusion. I'll

41:41

just say, you know, contractors here in

41:43

the city of Harrisburg have an

41:45

opportunity. And I know this is a small

41:47

project, so I'm not looking to get 50%.

41:51

You know, this is just a ask. It's not a

41:53

requirement. It's a ask. Um, this is

41:55

just something that I'm very passionate

41:57

about ensuring that, uh, the locals have

41:59

an opportunity to be included in the

42:01

economic growth of our city. Um, how

42:04

many jobs you think will this create?

42:06

>> I think, uh, 15. um in terms of the

42:10

primarily just via the the um the

42:14

subcontractor

42:15

uh skilled labor base.

42:18

>> Okay.

42:18

>> Um and I also that um we we do have um

42:22

projects that that are coming up too

42:24

that like I said that so when I say that

42:26

you know we we venture to to to GC that

42:28

we we do have projects coming up that

42:30

we're going to have uh specifically that

42:32

we have site control that are you know

42:34

very likely to happen. Um, so I I would

42:36

hope that this could be a, you know,

42:37

continued conversation about absolutely

42:39

who we employ and and how thoughtful

42:41

that process is. So,

42:43

>> well, absolutely. I'm just speaking for

42:44

uh the residents again, um, being my my

42:47

uh my lifetime here in the city, you

42:49

know, I've witnessed a lot of uh

42:51

construction and development happening

42:53

where um, a lot of us were cut out and

42:56

um, I'm just being that voice. Second

42:58

thing, um, safety wise, I see in here

43:00

that you guys won't be changing any of

43:01

the lighting. How efficient is that

43:03

lighting in that area to make to ensure

43:05

that the residents in that uh area can

43:08

have some some good lighting? I see some

43:10

of the historical things that you may

43:12

have to go through, but do you believe

43:14

the lighting is efficient in that area?

43:16

>> Um we're we're continuing to assess. I

43:18

think that that we want it to be a um a

43:22

much improved site in general. Um, and

43:24

we're we're still working um with some

43:27

of our subcontractors to figure out with

43:29

the facade and like what what the best

43:31

way for the building to present uh you

43:33

know as safe uh and attractive for the

43:36

community. So I don't I don't have a

43:37

specific answer right now other than to

43:39

say that it's for me personally it's

43:41

something that I'm I'm very focused on

43:43

even from a from a marketing standpoint

43:45

you know just uh in terms of the

43:47

profitability of the project that you

43:48

know we want um the site to be

43:51

transformed. Yeah. And we want people to

43:53

feel, you know, we want people to feel

43:54

good uh and safe about where they live

43:56

and we want the neighbors to feel good

43:58

and and and safe about what is is put in

44:00

their community or how buildings are

44:02

changed in their community. So whether

44:04

you know uh lighting um to the degree

44:06

that that we're allowed to um and then

44:10

uh safety in terms of safe access to the

44:12

building. Um

44:14

>> yeah, I see you have maybe three

44:15

different interestes to this property.

44:18

>> Yep. So, that's something that we're,

44:20

you know, we're working on with our

44:21

subcontractors and that we're at a

44:23

really critical point right now. We're

44:24

going to get a lot more detail here in

44:26

our in our coming meetings, but it's

44:27

it's a focus of mine. I can say that.

44:29

>> I appreciate it and I hope we can get an

44:30

update on that on those safety measures.

44:32

So, that would be great. And that's all

44:34

my questions. Thank you.

44:37

>> All right. And, uh, President Hill,

44:40

>> thank you. Good evening. My questions

44:43

are around affordability.

44:45

So, I wanted to know if uh this project

44:49

will be participating in the affordable

44:53

housing 20% relief.

44:56

>> Uh it will not. Um but when I when I

44:59

came before about 3:15 North Second I

45:01

think we we heard that feedback and and

45:04

we did um rework our you know our

45:07

performing our project and we were

45:09

working with the affordable housing

45:10

trust fund to try to take two of those

45:12

units um of the 10 and and make them

45:14

affordable. So we're it's something that

45:16

we're working on. Um we have other

45:19

actually our next two projects that we

45:21

hope to complete are going to be 100%

45:22

affordable um 28 units total um as

45:26

proposed right now. So, it's something

45:27

that we're, you know, going back to a

45:30

prior project to try to institute um and

45:32

that in our future projects that um when

45:36

and you know, we look at a lot of

45:37

different things, but these are very

45:38

present and future projects that that

45:40

are going to be 100% affordable. So, for

45:42

this one, it is not going to be, but

45:44

that we it's something that we're

45:47

passionate about and focused on and that

45:49

we're putting a lot of resources into

45:50

now and I think um over the next year

45:53

and a half that we're going to be able

45:54

to add a lot of affordable housing to

45:55

the and these are all projects in the

45:57

city. So,

45:58

>> Okay, great. Um for this project, it

46:01

would have only been approximately three

46:03

of the 13 units, but I'm glad to hear

46:06

that you are revisiting with the other

46:09

project. Um, it's just it's something

46:13

that I'm passionate about because it's

46:16

great to have um

46:20

rehabbed

46:22

um properties or even new units

46:27

available to our residents, but if

46:29

nobody can afford them, they're going to

46:31

remain vacant, right? Um, so I think I'm

46:35

glad to hear that you heard what I said

46:38

and that I'm going to continue to ask

46:40

because it's important, right? Um, one

46:44

developer once said, "Oh, it's going to

46:45

be a beautiful building." I'm like,

46:47

"That's nice. It's going to be beautiful

46:48

and empty because nobody can afford it."

46:51

So I just want to ensure that um I guess

46:55

not this project but your future

46:57

projects you are um taking the city

47:01

proper median income into consideration.

47:05

>> Yes.

47:05

>> I don't have any other questions. Thank

47:07

you.

47:09

>> Thank you. Um Councilwoman Ross.

47:11

>> Thank you very much um Councilman um

47:15

Lawson.

47:17

Um I just just to piggyback off of um

47:20

President Hill, I was wondering um if

47:23

there not going to be any affordable

47:25

apartments, how much are how much is the

47:28

rent going to be uh for the apartments?

47:30

I think it's one bedroom and two

47:32

bedrooms.

47:33

>> Yes. Yes. Um the the rents range from uh

47:37

1,000 per month to 1,800 per month and

47:41

the average is uh just over 13.

47:45

>> Okay. So, the 10,000 would be for the

47:47

one bedroom and

47:48

>> that's for a studio actually.

47:49

>> Oh, that's a studio. Okay.

47:52

>> Oh, wow.

47:54

Okay. Um, and then I just had a couple

47:57

more questions. Um, one of my questions

48:00

and it it actually wasn't until you were

48:03

speaking about that there were

48:05

apartments currently in the funeral home

48:07

and then you're converting um the bottom

48:09

level into I think eight more

48:11

apartments. There's five at the top. So,

48:13

I was thinking, are is there anybody

48:15

living currently in the five apartments

48:17

at the top? And okay. And so, I was just

48:21

thinking about them like, are you going

48:22

to be rehabbing their apartments? If so,

48:25

how are they going to be displaced? And

48:27

if you're not, then how are they going

48:29

to be displaced? If you're while you're

48:30

doing the bottom level. Um, so I guess

48:33

my question is just around like how are

48:35

you working with those residents? And is

48:37

there going to are they going to be

48:38

displaced at all? What kind of

48:40

provisions are you putting in place to

48:41

make sure that they're okay?

48:43

>> We do not have any plans to displace

48:45

those residents. Um

48:48

>> they are in terms of the current

48:49

occupation, I would need to when we went

48:52

under contract, it was uh 100% occupied.

48:56

So all five of the apartments were

48:57

occupied.

48:58

>> Okay.

48:58

>> Um we do not have any

49:01

>> we would like to from a maintenance

49:03

standpoint, the units are very nice

49:05

right now, but we would like from a

49:06

maintenance standpoint to improve them,

49:07

but we don't have any plans. It's not in

49:09

our budget to totally renovate them and

49:12

give the residents notice. So, our plan

49:13

is is to is to keep the residents in

49:16

place.

49:17

>> Okay. And you're and since you're not

49:18

going to re be redoing their apartments,

49:21

is their rent going to be raised?

49:23

>> The we don't have any plans to to to

49:26

raise rent on those residents right now.

49:27

Um we haven't had any communication with

49:29

the residents. Um I uh you know, and I

49:34

actually need to get more updates on

49:36

exactly the status of the occupancy. Um,

49:39

okay.

49:39

>> And, uh, but as of right now, we just

49:41

want to keep things as they are.

49:43

>> Okay. I mean, I know, um, per se it

49:46

doesn't really have anything to do with

49:49

the a vote on this property. It's not

49:51

part of the land development, but they

49:53

are a concern for me, the residents that

49:55

are in there, and just making sure, you

49:57

know, they're okay. The rent's not going

49:59

to be raised just because you are

50:01

rehabbing the bottom level, but you're

50:03

not going to be re renovating their

50:05

apartments. But if would would you be

50:07

able just to let us know how many um

50:10

residents are currently just living

50:12

there just for our

50:14

>> Yeah, I can get an update from the from

50:16

the seller and then as we kind of get

50:18

closer to our our actual settlement date

50:21

which is related to the construction

50:23

loan closing that I can get exact

50:25

information.

50:26

>> Okay, thank you. I appreciate that. Um

50:28

and then I just had um and just correct

50:30

me if I'm wrong. I just wanted residents

50:32

to know about the parking because

50:34

parking is a huge issue in the city. I

50:36

just wanted to make sure they knew that

50:38

um from the understanding you're going

50:39

to be providing 16 spaces for this um

50:44

multifamily dwelling that which is the

50:46

recommended amount and there could be

50:49

more spaces because there's a I think I

50:52

think uh you said across the street

50:54

there was a possibility or you could use

50:57

extra space. the the second street lot

51:00

actually has 36 spaces. Um and so

51:05

actually the you know separate from the

51:06

16 there's an additional 20

51:08

>> um that will be

51:10

>> um

51:11

>> there for flexibility. Okay. Um and so

51:13

there's that one of the uniqueness

51:16

things about this site is that there's

51:17

plenty of parking. So um and that right

51:20

now that parking will not be leased to

51:23

the public. Um okay because we do not

51:26

have permission to do that. Um,

51:28

>> so from the current resident standpoint,

51:31

um, that there's going to be plenty of

51:33

parking.

51:34

>> Okay. And will the parking be free for

51:35

them and the current residents that are

51:37

living in this dwelling?

51:40

>> Uh, right now for the the current

51:42

residents, it is free and we don't have

51:44

a plan to change that, but for the for

51:46

the new units, we're we're working on

51:48

our proform. There might be a fee for

51:49

parking. Um, and that's part of

51:52

assistance to to finance the project.

51:54

>> Okay. And how much are you looking for

51:56

to possibly charge the new residents of

51:59

the eight newly constructed apartments

52:01

or renovated apartments for parking?

52:04

>> My awareness of um the the rates is that

52:08

we we're either going to put it into

52:11

rent and it'll be part of the rental

52:12

consideration. We need to talk to our

52:13

property management company about where

52:15

that would be, but my awareness of the

52:16

market is between um 50 and and $75 per

52:21

month. Um but we have to, you know, once

52:24

we get um greater clarity on cost, we

52:28

have to decide exactly what we're going

52:29

to do with that. Um but um right now

52:32

it's up in the air. I need more info

52:34

from the property management company

52:35

about what they think would be the best

52:36

thing to do.

52:37

>> Okay. Thank you so much for answering my

52:39

questions. That's all for me.

52:42

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez.

52:44

>> Thank you, Chair Lawson. U Thank you

52:46

both for joining us this evening and

52:47

providing this presentation. I don't

52:49

really have questions, just some

52:51

sentiments for it. Um, I'm appreciative

52:53

that you'll be overhauling the amenities

52:55

for the current residents that are

52:57

there. Um, just to kind of match up if

53:00

there is I I guess if there isn't a

53:02

chance to upgrade, um, how would you go

53:05

about that or you just work like a

53:07

normal maintenance kind of let them

53:09

know, give them a heads up, make the

53:11

corrections, and kind of keep them in

53:12

the apartment?

53:13

>> Yeah, I think we take a lot of pride in

53:15

in in maintenance and our

53:17

responsiveness. Um, so I think that it's

53:19

a little bit of a of a balance to not be

53:21

disturbing, but wanting to improve the

53:23

quality. Um, so I think that our normal

53:26

process would be to reach out to all

53:28

those residents, you know, uh, how has

53:31

maintenance been? Do you have any

53:32

problems? What would you like to see

53:33

improved? You know, what are your plans

53:35

long term, you know, for for residing

53:37

here? And then, um, I think the basis

53:40

would just be super responsive to

53:42

maintenance and immediately take care of

53:44

of any problems, especially as they

53:46

relate to habitability. So, um I think

53:48

it would just be some communication and

53:49

kind of understand, you know, many that

53:52

they may say, "Hey, my unit's great. I

53:54

like my privacy." They may say, "Hey,

53:55

this these issues have been ongoing and

53:57

we need you to take care of them." And

53:58

and we are well resourced to do that and

54:00

we take tremendous pride in, you know,

54:02

all of our properties um that that's the

54:05

case that they're they're well taken

54:06

care of.

54:07

>> Thank you for that. And um I do

54:09

understand there has to be a bottom line

54:10

when you're doing any kind of

54:11

development so you can make the project

54:13

work. But uh 1,300 for a studio and like

54:17

upwards to 1,800 I think you mentioned

54:20

>> thousand for the studio, 13 average.

54:21

Yeah.

54:21

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. That kind of just

54:23

screamed, you know, not so affordable

54:26

for the area. Um and just kind of the

54:28

question of what kind of tenant are we

54:31

looking for? or is it just business

54:32

people coming into the city to work

54:34

downtown, which we definitely need some

54:36

more life pumped into the Midtown

54:38

downtown area? But we definitely need

54:40

some affordability for maybe, you know,

54:42

single parents or, you know, something

54:44

something afford along the lines of

54:46

that. So, that just kind of screams out

54:47

to me right away. Um, but I do

54:49

understand there's, you know, a bottom

54:51

line that you have to, you know, even to

54:52

make the project work, something has to,

54:54

you know, give weight. But I am

54:55

appreciative of uh the consideration of

54:58

your previous you know developments and

55:00

going into the affordability with those

55:02

units and I just look forward to future

55:04

developments and how we can make that

55:05

work for the families in the area. But

55:08

um the current parking lot you did

55:10

mention you would retain that as well

55:12

though, right? Um the the one that's

55:14

connected to the Okay.

55:16

>> Yes, that's part of the

55:17

>> And just for my own curiosity, is there

55:19

a crematory like in the building right

55:21

now like in the facility? Uh yes,

55:24

>> there is.

55:25

>> There is.

55:26

>> Yeah, I believe there's Well, I'm not

55:29

totally I don't I don't believe so

55:31

actually. I don't think that there is

55:34

cremation proceedings.

55:36

>> That's what I was I was curious about

55:37

that.

55:38

>> No, I don't I don't I don't think so. I

55:39

have not I have not seen that. It has

55:41

not been disclosed and I think that

55:44

their process is is different from that

55:47

on that on that site.

55:48

>> I didn't want to be on Ghost Hunters or

55:50

anything.

55:50

>> Yeah. No, this is Yeah, this is

55:53

>> But people are going to be living here

55:55

now.

55:55

>> Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And what I just

55:57

was curious because I know sometimes a

55:58

lot of fuel lines would have to be

56:00

connected to those furnaces. So that

56:02

could just be a lot of more work on your

56:04

end, but I was just curious more than

56:05

anything. It's not very frequent we get

56:08

these kind of developments, you know, um

56:10

restructuring old, you know, uh morg or

56:12

funeral home or crematory. So I I am

56:15

appreciative for you gentlemen being

56:16

here this evening. And that's all I

56:18

have. Thank you.

56:18

>> Thank you. Yep. Thank you. And then

56:21

Councilwoman Davis.

56:22

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. Good

56:24

evening, Mr. Knight and Mr. White. Um,

56:27

most of my questions were answered, but

56:29

I still have a few, well, two and then

56:33

one statement. What drives what what is

56:37

driving you to consider uh your next

56:40

project of 28 units and all of those to

56:43

be affordable?

56:46

>> Two separate projects um for 14 each.

56:49

Um,

56:50

I think it's really important. Um, you

56:53

know, I, uh, I didn't grow up directly

56:55

in the city of Harrisburg, but I spent

56:57

my entire life in, in the area. Um, and,

57:00

uh, I think that I'm very interested in

57:04

in learning um, and and participating in

57:07

more opportunities for affordable

57:08

housing. I think that they're and I just

57:11

look as a company, we want to be

57:12

balanced. You know, if we're going to do

57:14

market rate projects, I want to do

57:15

affordable projects, too. So we have

57:17

>> um you know two market rate projects

57:19

that you've heard about. We've gone back

57:21

and and made an adjustment to one and

57:22

then we have two affordable projects um

57:24

coming up. And then part of that was

57:25

actually just a process of you know

57:27

we've you know been educated by uh other

57:30

people on um you know what the

57:32

opportunities could be for the city um

57:35

and for us. So now

57:36

>> that's why you know the next couple you

57:38

know we're we're working hard for

57:39

affordable projects. So, it's balance.

57:41

Um, it's a it's a love for the for the

57:44

city of Harrisburg and and and wanting

57:46

there to be, I would say, a beautiful

57:48

building that is also affordable,

57:50

wanting to do great structures that are

57:52

accessible to a broader part of the

57:55

population in the market. And then from

57:57

a just wanting to be balanced and and

58:00

and help all the city's residents as

58:02

opposed to like a target population that

58:04

can afford rent that that might not be

58:07

accessible to to others.

58:09

>> Thank you. I appreciate that. And are

58:12

any of your units um developed for or

58:16

will they be developed for uh handicap

58:19

persons?

58:20

>> Well, on 1332, one of the interesting

58:25

things about the building is it has many

58:27

ground level access points. So, the

58:30

entire all of the units um and

58:35

the I think per code actually there's

58:38

going to be accessibility all the way

58:40

around the building just because of the

58:42

nature of the the units being on the

58:43

ground floor. So,

58:45

>> right.

58:45

>> So, I would say that a big part of, you

58:47

know, the the work around the building

58:48

is making sure that we have the

58:50

appropriate ramps and access all all

58:52

across the building and that's a big

58:54

part of what we're working on right now.

58:55

So, for 1332 and then

58:58

>> um for 315, yes, um too, we do have um

59:02

accessible units and then for our

59:05

upcoming projects um they're going to be

59:07

a little bit more challenging. um 2100

59:10

North Third, it's going to be a little

59:11

bit more challenging just because of the

59:12

historical nature of the building and

59:14

we're going to have to create that

59:15

access. Um but yeah, the general answer

59:18

would be yes. And sometimes it's

59:19

dependent on the site and the project

59:21

and we take advantage of that when we

59:22

can and sometimes we need to work to to

59:24

make sure that's the case.

59:26

>> And some of the other handicap features

59:29

would include like the bars in the

59:32

bathrooms to help persons too

59:34

>> that are handicapped.

59:36

>> Yep. I think openings, thresholds,

59:38

>> right?

59:38

>> Um access to the building and then um I

59:41

would just say in general just from

59:44

humanto human standpoint that um

59:46

>> we are open to we want to make units

59:50

available to everybody from the leasing

59:52

st you know standpoint and if somebody

59:53

came to me that needed accommodations um

59:56

like you know um accessibility bars and

59:58

bathrooms that I would be happy to to to

1:00:01

accommodate that. Um so thank you for

1:00:04

asking.

1:00:04

>> Thank you. And then

1:00:07

would you send out a letter to the

1:00:10

residents in the neighborhood um making

1:00:12

them aware that there's going to be

1:00:14

construction and maybe heavy equipment

1:00:17

there. Um, often times, uh, companies

1:00:21

come into the neighborhoods and they may

1:00:23

start working at 7:00 in the morning,

1:00:26

8:00 in the morning, and they're making

1:00:29

all this noise and nobody in the

1:00:31

neighborhood is aware that this uh, I

1:00:34

just think it's a, you know, nice uh,

1:00:36

touch and shows the respect for the

1:00:39

community as well as your tenants on the

1:00:42

second floor in that property.

1:00:44

>> Yeah. What? Absolutely. Um, and I know

1:00:45

that there's already been notice as part

1:00:47

of the standard process for our our

1:00:49

zoning hearing and and planning

1:00:50

commission. So, we we have had public

1:00:52

circulation of the, you know, of the

1:00:54

project approval process. And then I

1:00:55

think given the gap in time that it

1:00:58

would be appropriate to give an

1:00:59

additional notice when we have a a firm

1:01:01

construction day so everybody's aware.

1:01:02

That's

1:01:03

>> Thank you, Mr. White. That's it for me,

1:01:05

Mr. Councilman Lawson.

1:01:08

>> Thank you. And then, uh, Vice President

1:01:10

Jones said he had a follow-up. Yeah,

1:01:12

just one quick question um that I meant

1:01:14

to ask you. Uh far as the do you have an

1:01:17

estimate of what kind of taxes this

1:01:20

project would bring into the city

1:01:23

>> um

1:01:26

in terms of uh property tax revenue?

1:01:28

>> Yes, sir. Um I apologize. Yes.

1:01:30

>> Is it uh

1:01:34

>> just off the top of my head? I mean the

1:01:36

current um assessment um is around

1:01:40

20,000 uh a year and then

1:01:43

>> the improved at the common level ratio

1:01:46

there would be uh a significant increase

1:01:48

but I wouldn't know exactly until the

1:01:50

the the appraisal and I work with we

1:01:52

work with Van Allen and they're really

1:01:54

helpful on the tax side. So I don't know

1:01:56

exactly but there's definitely going to

1:01:57

be a massive improvement um you know to

1:02:00

the building and um

1:02:02

>> so you have to reassess.

1:02:04

>> Yeah, but we might I want to be that

1:02:06

that we might also pursue abatement

1:02:08

though too. So long term um it's going

1:02:11

to be a much improved building that is

1:02:13

much more valuable and um has a much

1:02:17

higher assessed value.

1:02:19

>> And so when you're looking at abatement

1:02:20

what what time I mean like five 10

1:02:23

>> there's a I think for it was just it was

1:02:25

just um or it's in the process of being

1:02:27

approved or it was just approved again

1:02:29

for 2026 and this would be the the 100%

1:02:32

residential tenure.

1:02:34

>> Okay. Thank you. No further questions.

1:02:37

>> Thank you. And then I had just one

1:02:39

followup just because there were a

1:02:41

question about the uh the rent range. Uh

1:02:43

what is the the unit mix as as far as

1:02:46

like types of bedrooms? Uh what are we

1:02:49

looking at there?

1:02:50

>> Uh primarily one-bedroom units, uh a

1:02:53

two-bedroom unit, and a studio. in terms

1:02:55

of the units created and then the

1:02:57

existing I think that there's there's

1:02:58

two threes

1:03:00

uh two twos and a one or a two and two

1:03:04

once I haven't really we don't um just

1:03:06

with respect to the residents and like

1:03:08

the current owner we haven't had the

1:03:09

most access to the to the occupied units

1:03:11

because that's disturbing and so um but

1:03:14

that's my that some of those units are

1:03:15

actually bigger

1:03:17

>> great thank you very much

1:03:19

um council would anyone have any

1:03:22

follow-up questions

1:03:24

>> not a follow-up question. Just want to

1:03:25

say within the perimeter of that

1:03:27

facility, of course you have Morris

1:03:29

laundry mat, you have Stillies, you have

1:03:31

the Grilled and Juice Bar. So just that

1:03:34

development alone or rejuvenate just

1:03:36

that small corridor right there, Second

1:03:37

Street. So you know, we get into the

1:03:39

habit of creating more developments like

1:03:40

this, we could really pump some more

1:03:42

life into Harrisburg. So

1:03:43

>> yeah, we're very we're very excited. I

1:03:45

appreciate you mentioning that. It's a

1:03:46

really cool corridor and part of the

1:03:47

city and we're hoping to contribute to

1:03:49

that.

1:03:49

>> Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you, Chair

1:03:51

Lawson.

1:03:53

>> Thank you. Thank you gentlemen very

1:03:54

much. Um I would uh like to uh move uh

1:03:59

resol resolution 4 2026 to our next uh

1:04:03

legislative um session. And I'm going to

1:04:07

uh encourage my uh fellow council

1:04:10

members to support this as we do need uh

1:04:13

more development in our in our in our

1:04:16

city and bringing it to that area would

1:04:18

be a great asset to the city. So,

1:04:22

thank you very much.

1:04:23

>> Thank you.

1:04:30

>> And I believe Mr. Knight, you're going

1:04:32

to stay right where you're at. Um,

1:04:34

Mr. Humphre, could you read please uh

1:04:36

resolution 52026 into the record?

1:04:40

>> Yes. Resolution 5 of 2026, a resolution

1:04:44

approving the preliminary/final land

1:04:46

development plan for 2601 North 3rd

1:04:49

Street, building 1, submitted by Gregory

1:04:52

Hawquist of Penmark Harrisburg Holdings

1:04:54

LLC to convert the vacant hospital

1:04:56

building into a mixeduse building and

1:04:58

associated site and access improvements.

1:05:02

>> Thank you. And once again, we have Mr.

1:05:04

Knight. And this time, I'll remember to

1:05:06

ask um who are you sitting with?

1:05:09

>> Sorry. Go ahead. council.

1:05:12

Uh my name is Greg Hulquist and I'm with

1:05:15

Penmark.

1:05:16

>> Okay. Thank you very much, Mr. Hulquist.

1:05:18

And uh it looks as if we have a uh

1:05:20

presentation if you could please.

1:05:22

>> Yeah, I'll do a little introduction and

1:05:23

I'll hand it off to Mr. Hawquist to go

1:05:26

through the PowerPoint. Um uh so as

1:05:28

Cedric noted, uh this uh proposal is

1:05:32

actually the um second phase of the uh

1:05:35

poly clinic hospital campus

1:05:37

revitalization.

1:05:38

um council may remember I think last

1:05:40

year uh reviewing uh building number

1:05:42

three which is phase one uh which is at

1:05:44

the northern end of this site um and was

1:05:47

the former nurses quarters uh so that

1:05:49

was a bit more of a I think easy

1:05:50

conversion to apartments this is going

1:05:52

to be a conversion of the main hospital

1:05:54

building uh at the southern end of the

1:05:56

site uh so much bigger um institutional

1:05:59

space um so uh the proposal is um

1:06:03

significantly different in terms of both

1:06:05

the number of units and the types of

1:06:07

uses that will on site. Um they're

1:06:10

proposing to convert the vacant hospital

1:06:11

into a mixeduse building featuring 130

1:06:13

residential units, associated amenity

1:06:15

space for tenants and both space

1:06:18

reserved for retail store uses and space

1:06:20

set aside for future development

1:06:22

proposals. Um so that will allow the

1:06:24

project to I think evolve over time um

1:06:27

as uh some of these units come on board

1:06:29

and as I think they probably further

1:06:31

their engagement with the neighborhood

1:06:32

uh the surrounding neighborhood. They've

1:06:34

been um h having a lot of meetings as

1:06:36

you may recall from the first phase of

1:06:37

this project. Uh the project proposes

1:06:40

units in a variety of configurations and

1:06:42

sizes from studios to three-bedroom

1:06:44

apartments and from 544 ft to 1144 or

1:06:48

sorry 1143 ft. Um again this is uh the

1:06:53

second phase here. Uh the um applicants

1:06:56

have a uh significant amount of parking

1:06:59

associated with that. You can see in the

1:07:00

upper right hand corner of that uh uh of

1:07:03

the um PowerPoint slide there, the

1:07:05

parking garage. I think it's somewhere

1:07:06

in the neighborhood of like 400 parking

1:07:08

spaces, 440 parking spaces in that

1:07:10

garage. And then there's also a

1:07:11

significant amount of on-site surface

1:07:14

parking um to the west of the main

1:07:16

buildings there. Um and uh as noted, uh

1:07:20

there will be it's going to be a

1:07:21

mixeduse building, so there is space um

1:07:23

along the fourth street frontage for um

1:07:25

some outward facing commercial uses and

1:07:28

then some kind of flex space for the

1:07:30

future on all of the floors. Uh so that

1:07:33

would be I think a really unique aspect

1:07:35

of having some sort of a commercial or

1:07:37

community focused space on upper floor.

1:07:39

So it's not necessarily just entrance

1:07:41

right in at the ground level. Um but uh

1:07:44

overall, you know, this uh is a very

1:07:47

unique and challenging um footprint of a

1:07:50

building and floor plan of a building.

1:07:52

Uh so we're excited to have somebody uh

1:07:55

that is um on site and uh working

1:07:58

through the process to hopefully bring

1:08:00

this property uh back into productive

1:08:03

use for the city. Both contributing to

1:08:05

uh the tax base as we've heard before

1:08:07

here and then also providing um new

1:08:10

housing units for um potentially current

1:08:13

residents of the neighborhood as well as

1:08:14

future residents. and then some um

1:08:17

neighborhood focused um commercial and

1:08:20

community uh amenity space. Uh with that

1:08:22

all being said, uh the planning

1:08:24

commission recommend that city council

1:08:27

approved the request with the following

1:08:28

conditions. Uh the applicant must

1:08:30

reconstruct portions of the fourth

1:08:32

street sidewalk to be ADA compliant and

1:08:34

specifically the loading dock in the

1:08:36

middle of the block. Uh the bureau

1:08:37

recommends that other points with

1:08:38

vehicular crossings utilize driveway

1:08:40

designs with consistent raised safe

1:08:43

raised sidewalks across them for safer

1:08:46

uh vehicular pedestrian conflict points.

1:08:48

And uh that first point was if you uh

1:08:51

are familiar with the process, there's

1:08:52

like uh two loading docks off of Fourth

1:08:54

Street that trucks would back into right

1:08:56

off the street. So it kind of cuts up

1:08:57

the sidewalk right there. So, we're just

1:08:59

recommending that that be, you know,

1:09:00

reconstructed and hopefully to have a a

1:09:03

raised crosswalk design across some of

1:09:05

the two vehicular access points um into

1:09:08

the site on Fourth Street. Uh the

1:09:11

applicant must coordinate with the

1:09:12

Department of Public Works regarding the

1:09:13

size, location, and screening of any

1:09:15

required refuge containers. Uh the

1:09:16

planning bureau recommends the applicant

1:09:18

consider eventually consolidating all

1:09:20

refuge storage and access in the

1:09:22

existing vehicular access areas along

1:09:24

the Fourth Street frontage. And again,

1:09:26

there are two kind of little pocket um

1:09:28

parking areas, loading areas off of

1:09:30

Fourth Street uh for the former hospital

1:09:33

there um that would perhaps make a good

1:09:36

location for uh trash trucks to be able

1:09:38

to get into and also to keep uh the

1:09:41

refues uh off of the public rightway uh

1:09:43

frontage. Um the applicant must ensure

1:09:46

that any proposed signage for the

1:09:47

businesses on site is in conformance

1:09:48

with the applicable regulations or they

1:09:50

must secure the necessary zoning relief.

1:09:52

And finally, the planning bureau

1:09:54

recommends that sheltered bike parking

1:09:55

be provided at the main entrances to

1:09:57

both the residential and commercial

1:09:58

components of the property with secured

1:10:00

bike storage potentially located in one

1:10:02

of the proposed amenity areas on the

1:10:04

first floor as shown in the floor plans.

1:10:07

Uh planning commission recommends that

1:10:08

Harrisburg City Council approve the

1:10:10

request for the following reasons. The

1:10:13

adaptive reuse of a large vacant and

1:10:15

underutilized institutional building

1:10:16

into a mixeduse building with lower

1:10:18

level retail store spaces and apartments

1:10:20

above represents a unique and

1:10:22

challenging project in the city and will

1:10:24

support redevelopment of the remaining

1:10:25

buildings that comprise the former

1:10:27

hospital campus. Additionally, the

1:10:28

applicant is retaining flexibility in

1:10:30

the project by reserving portions of the

1:10:31

building for future development

1:10:32

proposals which will help the project

1:10:34

grow more organically to support the

1:10:36

needs of existing residents of the

1:10:37

neighborhood and future residents of the

1:10:39

development. A successful redevelopment

1:10:41

of this institutional site may help

1:10:43

catalyze redevelopment and reactivation

1:10:45

of other institutional sites to the

1:10:46

north, including the former William Penn

1:10:48

High School and the Zebo Shrine. Other

1:10:51

conversions of former commercial or

1:10:52

institutional buildings elsewhere in the

1:10:53

city have generally de demonstrated such

1:10:55

projects do not adversely impact the

1:10:57

neighborhoods in which they are located

1:10:58

and often help generate other

1:11:00

improvements in the in those

1:11:01

communities. And finally, the proposed

1:11:04

redevelopment will add new residents to

1:11:05

the neighborhood to activate the street

1:11:07

on nights and weekends and grow customer

1:11:09

base to support local businesses while

1:11:11

providing a new neighborhood focused

1:11:13

space and will provide additional units

1:11:14

to the uptown housing inventory.

1:11:27

>> Mr. Hus, please.

1:11:29

>> So, I put a little presentation

1:11:30

together. to see everybody again. Uh,

1:11:33

council,

1:11:35

um, is it okay if I give a quick update

1:11:36

on building three, what you guys

1:11:39

approved in November, just to sort of

1:11:40

update you on what's happening?

1:11:42

>> Um, next slide, please.

1:11:44

>> So, this is an overall progress schedule

1:11:46

of building three. Um,

1:11:50

yeah, it started out with city council

1:11:52

approving the zoning. We went in for

1:11:54

land development approval.

1:11:56

Uh, we submitted that in August, so you

1:11:58

all approved it. I think it was July 7th

1:12:01

and then we submitted on August 1st. We

1:12:03

went in front of uh planning commission

1:12:05

on 93

1:12:07

and they recommended it for approval and

1:12:09

then we uh went in front of you on 113

1:12:12

and then 1110 you voted it into

1:12:15

into action there and so we from that

1:12:19

point we went into detail design.

1:12:22

The detailed design is basically at the

1:12:24

point now of going out for bid. Um the

1:12:27

reason I highlight that uh is about the

1:12:29

questions around minority participation,

1:12:32

you know, which is something I'm sorry

1:12:34

I'm a little sick. So, uh something that

1:12:36

I um talked about every time I've been

1:12:40

in front of council is something that's

1:12:41

important to us. And um so

1:12:46

hopefully all those the subcontractors

1:12:48

will be seeing those drawings. Uh we got

1:12:52

our demo permit on 9:30 and we started

1:12:54

demolition as soon as council approved

1:12:58

in November. Um we started demolition

1:13:02

and we actually had to stop because we

1:13:04

ran into some structural questions. This

1:13:06

is an old building. It's 100-y old

1:13:08

building or at least portions of it are.

1:13:11

It's um actually was built over four

1:13:14

different time periods. So all these

1:13:18

different structures and questions came

1:13:20

up. So, we had to stop, pause, get

1:13:24

questions answered, and then we're back

1:13:26

under construction again with the

1:13:27

demolition.

1:13:29

And our construction will really get

1:13:30

started in earnest as soon as that demo

1:13:32

is far enough along. We did get our

1:13:34

building permit. Um,

1:13:37

I guess uh yeah, January 13th. So, we're

1:13:41

ready to start and we'll steam ahead as

1:13:44

soon as our demo is far enough along.

1:13:45

Next slide, please.

1:13:49

I wanted to give a quick update on the

1:13:52

um historic tax credit process. It is

1:13:54

very involved and

1:13:57

um it's important that I talk about it

1:13:59

because we have told the neighbors and

1:14:03

told council that we're going to

1:14:04

preserve the building and I just thought

1:14:06

it would be important to let you guys

1:14:08

know where we are with that. Next slide.

1:14:14

So this is kind of the layout of the

1:14:16

overall program. When you submit for

1:14:18

historic tax credits, you have to go in

1:14:20

with the whole campus all at one shot.

1:14:24

So that's building three, building one,

1:14:25

and building two. Our main focus right

1:14:28

now is building three, but we are

1:14:30

working on the tax credits for buildings

1:14:33

three and building one at the same time.

1:14:36

I circled that building three because

1:14:38

the next slide,

1:14:40

uh, please, next slide.

1:14:43

This is the the schedule for building

1:14:46

three only. And every one of those lines

1:14:48

is a lot of work. So we have a

1:14:50

fourperson team working about halfime

1:14:54

for the last five or six months on

1:14:56

getting the historic tax credit. So it's

1:14:58

just sort of a no one can read any of

1:15:01

that I know but uh

1:15:07

next slide please. Uh a little uh sense

1:15:11

of the progress. We are very fortunate

1:15:13

to have an excellent uh demolition

1:15:16

contractor

1:15:17

who's really doing a great job and um

1:15:20

this is kind of some before uh we really

1:15:23

started on the first first the fourth

1:15:25

floor, excuse me. Uh and are working our

1:15:29

way down. And next slide. And this is

1:15:32

what that looks like after about four

1:15:35

weeks. I mean the I want to say the

1:15:38

hardest part of the fourth floor looks

1:15:40

like this. and you could eat your dinner

1:15:44

off the floor. I mean, it's insane how

1:15:47

clean and and thorough and good a job

1:15:49

that's a local contractor.

1:15:51

There are ample

1:15:54

folks here. We just have to find them.

1:15:56

And um this is an example of that. So,

1:16:00

next slide.

1:16:03

We talked a little bit about

1:16:05

um the last time we got in front of you

1:16:08

guys about site logistics and that was

1:16:10

important and we it is locked down just

1:16:14

like this. Hopefully if any of you have

1:16:16

driven by you see that we really try to

1:16:18

make sure that the site is tight

1:16:21

um that there's not loose anything

1:16:24

anywhere. It's like we've got a really

1:16:25

good construction manager, a really good

1:16:27

demolition contractor,

1:16:29

and we're doing our best to follow the

1:16:31

the rules. We have a couple more um

1:16:35

meetings with the neighbors coming up.

1:16:37

Um those are going to go on the city

1:16:39

website out of the gate this time

1:16:42

instead of the last time. We found out

1:16:43

the hard way that we were getting a poor

1:16:46

showing because we weren't advertising

1:16:48

it the right way. And uh so we'll just

1:16:50

do that right out of the gate. This will

1:16:52

be our sixth and seventh

1:16:55

u meeting with the neighbors and we'll

1:16:56

give them an update uh as well and talk

1:16:59

about building one because right now all

1:17:02

eyes are on building three but building

1:17:04

one's more the same. So we want to make

1:17:06

sure everybody's

1:17:08

u connected with what's going on.

1:17:11

Building one would follow building three

1:17:13

by about two or three months. Three

1:17:15

months say

1:17:16

u so it had to do with financing why we

1:17:20

split it up that way.

1:17:22

couldn't go to a bank and have them

1:17:23

finance 230 units all at one shot.

1:17:28

Um, next slide.

1:17:30

Um, so a little bit uh more about uh

1:17:34

building one which is phase two. So land

1:17:36

development on building three is done.

1:17:39

This is about building one. Next slide.

1:17:44

Uh this is where it sits on the site. I

1:17:46

think most folks are aware of it. You

1:17:47

all have seen I think all of this

1:17:49

before.

1:17:51

um in the zoning uh the resoning

1:17:54

application and again with the land

1:17:56

development application that we just

1:17:57

submitted

1:17:59

and these are just some 3D views of it's

1:18:02

all in a model so I asked the architect

1:18:05

you know sent me some pretty pictures

1:18:07

whatever and that's what he sent me so

1:18:10

next slide

1:18:14

um so this is an aerial from the fourth

1:18:16

street side and the uh reason I wanted

1:18:19

to show that is one. It kind of shows

1:18:21

the mass of this. I get lost every time

1:18:24

I go in this building. It's five

1:18:26

stories, including the lowest level.

1:18:28

It's 205,000 square feet roughly.

1:18:32

We can't use all the square footage with

1:18:35

the zoning uh limit that we have with

1:18:39

230 units. This campus really could

1:18:41

support more like 300 units. Um

1:18:45

we just we can't use it all. Um, next

1:18:50

slide.

1:18:52

And the these are some street views. Um,

1:18:55

the main entrance, that's the

1:18:56

picturesque entrance that everybody

1:18:58

sees, but honestly, the street views on

1:19:01

the right and on the bottom is really

1:19:03

what everybody sees. And that's the old

1:19:06

on the right is the old emergency um

1:19:09

entrance,

1:19:11

which lends itself to a grocery store.

1:19:15

Um,

1:19:16

pardon me.

1:19:20

So, we are talking to someone right now.

1:19:22

It's not Whole Foods.

1:19:26

It's a local

1:19:28

It's a local uh merchant who has two

1:19:31

facilities in the city now. And this

1:19:34

would be about 6,000 square feet. We We

1:19:38

could do like 10 or 12, honestly. And

1:19:41

for a

1:19:42

medium-sized grocery store, you want

1:19:46

like 10 to 12. Uh,

1:19:50

but they want about six. And we think it

1:19:53

would be great uh to be able to have a

1:19:56

local

1:19:58

merchant, you know, provide that kind of

1:20:00

resource for the neighbors. Uh, we will

1:20:03

make no money here. We know that. It's

1:20:05

not for that. It's really to try to

1:20:08

though

1:20:10

we're going to try to work something out

1:20:12

with them. Hopefully we can. Um they

1:20:15

were going to be here tonight but their

1:20:17

daughter is sick. So um so that's

1:20:21

you know a use there. That would be

1:20:23

great. And that's on that corner on the

1:20:25

bottom. But what you see when you go

1:20:28

down four street and I know it's quiet

1:20:29

and we've heard the neighbors loud and

1:20:31

clear. We understand their concerns. We

1:20:33

think now not like we live there and we

1:20:35

don't proclaim to act like we know

1:20:39

exactly but I've had developments come

1:20:41

in my neighborhood and where I lived in

1:20:43

outside of Philadelphia and I'd like to

1:20:46

think I understand that

1:20:49

uh we need to listen to them. But right

1:20:51

now it's a blight like it's an eyesore

1:20:54

and it's getting worse. And one of the

1:20:57

nice things about the historic tax

1:20:58

credits is it gives us some funding to

1:21:00

clean the brick up. Um, and that's a lot

1:21:04

of brick in that building.

1:21:06

Hundreds of thousands of square feet of

1:21:08

brick. It's crazy.

1:21:11

But anyway, so next slide.

1:21:14

This is the first floor. It gives you an

1:21:16

idea of the apartment layout. This was

1:21:18

in your should have been in your packet.

1:21:20

You all you all got a packet right from

1:21:23

Yeah. Okay.

1:21:25

Um and you see on the upper right there

1:21:27

that we left

1:21:29

an area um conveniently for future that

1:21:33

was it would be easy to develop later

1:21:37

because it's vertical. So you can

1:21:39

imagine running sanitary stacks with

1:21:41

apartments up on below you. So we we

1:21:44

kind of left a wing.

1:21:47

Right now, our zoning limits us to

1:21:49

really apartments um in terms of use,

1:21:53

but we're capped out in terms of

1:21:55

capacity. So, we're

1:21:57

whatever we do, we're going to have to

1:21:59

go in for zoning relief

1:22:02

um and get approval and go through

1:22:03

zoning hearing board and go through

1:22:05

planning, go through city council. And

1:22:07

obviously, that's a very heavy neighbor

1:22:11

community concern. So, we'll have to do

1:22:14

our homework and make sure we get the

1:22:16

word out and solicit uh feedback from

1:22:19

the neighbors and make sure we hear

1:22:21

them. So, so that's one possible use.

1:22:24

Another would be a small hotel that

1:22:27

would require zoning use relief.

1:22:31

We're not allowed to do that right now

1:22:32

with CN zoning. So, again, we'd have to

1:22:34

go in front of the neighbors.

1:22:37

Whether or not that's even in the cards

1:22:39

or not is to be determined. you know,

1:22:41

we'd have first have to attract someone

1:22:42

to go in front of zoning, you know, so

1:22:45

we're somewhat limited. It's a big

1:22:47

building. Um, and then the next slide.

1:22:50

Oh, I'm sorry. I'm go back to So, the

1:22:54

building itself is 203,000 square ft.

1:22:58

Uh, it's five stories. We are utilizing

1:23:03

124 of residential and retail is 15,000.

1:23:07

So, it's about 139 of the 203. So that

1:23:10

gives you an idea. There's still 63,000

1:23:13

square feet which in itself is a whole

1:23:16

project.

1:23:18

Um and then building two is another 27.

1:23:21

So it's

1:23:23

90,000 square feet. That

1:23:28

it's a lot. Um next slide. And this is

1:23:33

an important slide because this is the

1:23:35

first floor which is massive. It's all

1:23:38

the back of house for the hospital and

1:23:41

you are somewhat limited to what you can

1:23:43

do down there. I mean there is window on

1:23:46

the four street side.

1:23:51

Um so we could do residential units

1:23:53

there but I mean even we have a lot of

1:23:57

amenity uh carved out here. You still

1:24:01

have a lot of future. So,

1:24:04

um, but the retail along Fourth Street

1:24:06

is really what we're we're excited about

1:24:10

trying to make, um, as much of that

1:24:12

happen as possible. And so, the grocery

1:24:14

would go in the corner right now, and I

1:24:16

just got plans back from

1:24:19

from that merchant, uh, on Saturday, and

1:24:22

we're going to meet on Friday

1:24:24

and start to work the numbers and see if

1:24:27

we can come to a an agreement there. And

1:24:30

then the middle section is what we had

1:24:33

called out as a possible restaurant. It

1:24:35

is also too big for a restaurant.

1:24:38

Um, so it could be two or three

1:24:41

restaurants. Honestly, it's big enough.

1:24:46

Um, if anybody's interested in some old

1:24:49

boiler room steel,

1:24:51

we're we're taking inquiries. I mean,

1:24:53

that thing is loaded with boiler room

1:24:56

steel. But

1:24:59

um and then the the far left is was the

1:25:02

old wash room and we had that pegged as

1:25:05

a gym.

1:25:07

It's too big for a gym,

1:25:11

but I mean certainly a portion of it and

1:25:14

there's a good amount of amenity here

1:25:16

that we could we could make use of and

1:25:18

more retail if if there's an interest.

1:25:21

But the the retail is somewhat

1:25:23

fragmented. It's not like a strip mall

1:25:26

because there's space in between. So,

1:25:28

it's sort of isolated, but it still will

1:25:30

generate some foot traffic. Next slide,

1:25:33

please.

1:25:36

Um

1:25:38

I This is a slide I presented last time.

1:25:40

There's at least $30 million in

1:25:42

construction, about uh 50 full-time

1:25:46

equivalent

1:25:48

conservatively

1:25:50

uh phase three jobs and 70 I think the

1:25:53

last applicant said 15 and this is more

1:25:57

than three times the size. So I think

1:25:59

that's conservative 50 but um

1:26:04

and uh they this building would be 90.

1:26:08

So, it's a lot of jobs. And our our goal

1:26:11

is to try to

1:26:14

we're going to try to split this

1:26:15

building up so that more folks that are

1:26:18

local can participate and get their beak

1:26:22

wet, so to speak. Um there's plenty of

1:26:24

work to go around.

1:26:26

There's really too much for anyone

1:26:28

contractor here in any trade. So,

1:26:32

we expect there will be two or three

1:26:35

drywall and framing contractors. uh two

1:26:38

or three demo contractors,

1:26:40

two or three electricians, you know, or

1:26:42

more, whatever it needs to be. Um but

1:26:44

that it's it's a good opportunity for

1:26:46

that.

1:26:48

Um next slide.

1:26:51

Uh we talked about uh not to beat a dead

1:26:54

horse, but we have meetings six and

1:26:56

seven coming up on 23 and 210,

1:27:01

and we'll go through uh the city website

1:27:04

for that. I talked to Jared today about

1:27:06

who to do that with and he sent me the

1:27:08

information. So, we'll set that up. Uh,

1:27:12

I want to touch on I know the questions

1:27:14

will be asked, so I'm going to touch on

1:27:16

it anyhow. The past neighbor meetings,

1:27:19

the questions were around parking.

1:27:24

We talked about parking last time that

1:27:26

we have more than enough parking and

1:27:28

that a lot of the parking like right now

1:27:30

there's no one in these buildings. like

1:27:32

we're not taking up any parking in the

1:27:34

neighborhood. It's not what it's not us

1:27:36

that's doing it. It's still a concern

1:27:40

that we do not add to that. Um

1:27:46

it's really UPMC is is the issue. We've

1:27:49

offered spaces to residents if we have

1:27:52

the garage and anybody that wants one

1:27:54

and we'll continue to offer that at the

1:27:55

public meetings.

1:27:57

Um traffic was a concern as a an office

1:28:01

building. We So we we hired for building

1:28:04

three, we hired a firm to do a tripgen

1:28:08

letter and that was at the city

1:28:10

engineers request and we met with the

1:28:12

city engineer.

1:28:15

They asked us to do a campuswide letter

1:28:18

or a tripgen letter which we did. We met

1:28:20

with the city engineer. So I'll show you

1:28:22

what that showed in one second. Um

1:28:27

security and safety was a concern. you

1:28:30

know, will this bring crime into the

1:28:31

neighborhood? We explained that studies

1:28:34

would show that it does the opposite. It

1:28:36

brings

1:28:38

population that otherwise it's a it's a

1:28:42

vacant lot. Like we've found squatters,

1:28:45

you know, there's it's hard to keep up

1:28:49

with with that. There's not a fence, you

1:28:51

know, like a barbed wire fence around

1:28:53

this property. So it would bring light

1:28:56

and you know not overly done but it

1:29:00

would bring

1:29:02

attention and focus to the to the area

1:29:06

uh as far as security and safety go.

1:29:09

And then they had the neighbors had

1:29:11

construction related questions. When

1:29:13

would it start? What time would it

1:29:14

start? Things like that. We think we've

1:29:16

hopefully we've ironed that out with

1:29:18

building three. Um, in terms of we

1:29:22

haven't had complaints. Uh, we did have

1:29:24

one call a neighbor explained that there

1:29:27

was a strobing light going off in our

1:29:29

building. So, that's good. It was an

1:29:32

false alarm, but

1:29:34

that was good. I think it was a power

1:29:35

outage or something in the area. Next

1:29:38

slide, please.

1:29:40

We showed you the parking plan last

1:29:42

time, and that's the garage that Jeffrey

1:29:44

was referring to in the upper right

1:29:46

there.

1:29:48

And so it's not nothing's changed as far

1:29:51

as that goes. We have

1:29:55

actually

1:29:57

we have more more than enough parking

1:29:59

because the parking the more than enough

1:30:01

parking was based on a certain maxed out

1:30:04

situation which we're not even going to

1:30:06

exceed with phases one and two. So

1:30:10

next slide.

1:30:14

So there it is. Uh that's the capacity.

1:30:17

Next slide.

1:30:20

Um, this you didn't see. Uh, this was

1:30:23

the trip. This was the, uh, campuswide

1:30:26

tripgen. The most recent use of this was

1:30:30

as office and we went over this with the

1:30:33

city engineer building one, which is the

1:30:36

ones that are circled.

1:30:39

We just lost that lease like a year and

1:30:42

some months ago. Um,

1:30:45

so it'll go from 252 peak in the AM to

1:30:51

66 as an apartment building

1:30:54

at 240 to 266 and on the weekend 179 to

1:30:59

63. So it's a redu a significant

1:31:02

reduction from an office use to a

1:31:05

apartment building use and

1:31:06

multi-residential use

1:31:09

uh mixed use. Next slide.

1:31:13

That's it.

1:31:18

>> All right. Thank you very much. That was

1:31:20

a a great presentation. Um I personally

1:31:23

have uh a stake in this project just

1:31:27

because I live not too terribly far away

1:31:29

and hopefully um the retail is going to

1:31:32

be something that we can enjoy. I love

1:31:34

the idea of bringing a grocery store a

1:31:36

little closer to home that I can walk to

1:31:38

and and and take items back. And also as

1:31:41

a hotel, excuse me, not a hotel. Very

1:31:44

wishful thinking there. But as a uh

1:31:48

as a hospital, this is where I I learned

1:31:51

my grandmother was human. So getting

1:31:54

Yeah. Actually, she she became sick. And

1:31:56

before that, you know, you you just look

1:31:58

at your your your parents, your

1:31:59

grandparents is they're they're super

1:32:01

human. But right there is so it's a it's

1:32:02

a it's a piece of of Harrisburg history

1:32:05

that does mean a lot to me. And I and I

1:32:07

appreciate you um touching base on some

1:32:11

of the questions that I would I would

1:32:12

have had for you is definitely want to

1:32:14

see minority uh and and diverse business

1:32:17

um uh

1:32:20

access to this to this project as well

1:32:22

as a lot of our our local residents

1:32:24

because again we want to keep as much of

1:32:26

that money in the city limits as

1:32:28

possible um so that we're we're

1:32:30

providing good jobs for for our

1:32:32

residents. Um, and it it may have been

1:32:34

in there just of curiosity from uh from

1:32:38

our last discussion. What what is like

1:32:40

the the mix of apartments? Are we

1:32:42

looking at one bedrooms, two bedrooms?

1:32:44

>> So, it's uh studios to two beds. We may

1:32:47

in building three have some three beds.

1:32:49

Um, we're going to continue to look at,

1:32:53

you know, what the market says. It's

1:32:55

really saying studios ones, twos, but we

1:32:58

we have enough room to have some threes.

1:33:00

Um, so we'll I think we'll have some

1:33:02

threes. The rents are

1:33:06

uh they were a tad higher, they're a tad

1:33:10

lower now. Uh we start in the mid 900s

1:33:13

for studio

1:33:15

and uh we're right now we're we're not

1:33:19

at subsidized

1:33:21

you know low-inccome h tax tax credit

1:33:23

housing levels of affordability

1:33:27

but we are at market rate 80% AMI for

1:33:30

many of our units. um the financing that

1:33:33

we have just won't allow for u

1:33:38

the lower level of affordability like

1:33:40

30% AMI.

1:33:42

>> Um but like the last applicant, we're

1:33:46

actually

1:33:48

we're meeting with Brian Hudson, we're

1:33:50

we're exploring

1:33:52

really being able to do affordable with

1:33:55

the right financing.

1:33:57

um Allah

1:33:59

Tar Castile and Leseawn McCoy and Aaron

1:34:03

Donald like those guys got his

1:34:05

low-inccome housing tax credits which is

1:34:07

what you need for that level of

1:34:09

affordability whether you do four or 9%

1:34:12

deter you know it's whether or not

1:34:14

you're at 30 or

1:34:16

50 or 60% we're at 80 but that's what

1:34:19

the private market would require but

1:34:23

that's where our levels are so it's that

1:34:25

mix and about that that uh price around

1:34:30

u 13 to450 for a one bed and uh 1,600

1:34:36

for a two bed.

1:34:39

>> Okay. Thank you very much.

1:34:40

>> Yeah,

1:34:40

>> that's that's everything I had as far as

1:34:43

questions. So, I will uh come to my left

1:34:47

here with uh Councilwoman Green if you

1:34:49

have any questions.

1:34:51

>> Thank you very much. Thank you,

1:34:52

gentlemen, for being here tonight. Um, I

1:34:54

don't really have many questions. We've

1:34:56

discussed this project a few times over.

1:34:58

So, glad to see it it progressing and

1:35:00

moving forward. Also glad to see that

1:35:02

you're using some some local companies

1:35:04

uh in the construction uh which is

1:35:06

something that you discussed, but a lot

1:35:07

of times we never hear the followup

1:35:09

whether people actually use them or not.

1:35:11

Everyone says they're going to, but not

1:35:12

many actually do. So, thank you for

1:35:14

following through with that. So, thank

1:35:15

you.

1:35:17

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones.

1:35:20

>> Thank you. Thank you for uh coming in uh

1:35:22

this evening and giving us an update.

1:35:25

But I will just share that I I have been

1:35:27

to this site several times and um you

1:35:30

are correct, Councilwoman Green, that um

1:35:33

I I've actually seen locals working

1:35:35

there and and and I thank you. Um she's

1:35:38

correct. A lot of people come in and say

1:35:40

that they're going to do these things.

1:35:42

Not that we have any compliance around

1:35:43

that. And hopefully it's okay that I

1:35:46

stop by because I don't want to seem

1:35:47

like I'm the compliance officer.

1:35:49

>> You're all welcome.

1:35:51

I I did go there and I seen it and um

1:35:53

>> just stop telling our contractors what

1:35:55

to do. But

1:35:57

>> no uh but I really appreciate that

1:35:59

because um that that is something that's

1:36:01

very near and dear to my heart. Not that

1:36:02

my uh opinion or you know uh weighs on

1:36:06

this project. But I I really am glad to

1:36:08

see that that that's happening. And um

1:36:10

to hear the future um I agree with

1:36:13

Councilman um Lawson um grocery stores.

1:36:15

We know we're in a food desert. that's

1:36:17

something that's really needed in the

1:36:19

city and I think um again being in that

1:36:21

walkable area it would definitely help

1:36:23

the residents and the last thing that I

1:36:25

would say is um please keep me updated

1:36:27

because I did um come to a few of the

1:36:30

first community meetings that you had um

1:36:32

and just giving that update I just I

1:36:34

would love to hear what some of the

1:36:36

residents in that area have to say about

1:36:38

the potential of the things that you're

1:36:40

looking to do and where they're at with

1:36:42

that. So and I can also share that with

1:36:44

my colleagues. So again, I just want to

1:36:45

thank you uh for bringing this project

1:36:47

to our city and uh keep up the good

1:36:49

work.

1:36:50

>> 700,000

1:36:53

>> taxes.

1:36:57

Well, I'll say thank you, Vice President

1:37:00

Jones, and I'm going to say thank you

1:37:01

for that 700,000 as as well, President

1:37:05

Hill.

1:37:06

>> Thank you. Good evening. Um many I think

1:37:09

many of my questions um were answered

1:37:12

through your presentation, but I'm

1:37:15

excited we're moving to phase two. Um

1:37:18

also excited that the grocery store

1:37:21

you'reing a local merchant, so that's

1:37:23

really exciting. I hope their daughter

1:37:25

feels better. Um a restaurant or

1:37:29

restaurant. Um the gym, maybe downsizing

1:37:33

the gym. Um, and then some of the

1:37:35

concerns of the neighbors. I'm glad to

1:37:38

hear that you're continuing to

1:37:40

communicate. That was going to be one of

1:37:41

my questions. Um, but the two meetings

1:37:44

on February the 3rd and February 10th,

1:37:48

I'm hopeful that you'll have good

1:37:49

attendance there. Um, also happy to hear

1:37:53

that you're re-evaluating the rent

1:37:55

range. Um, I'm sure you knew that was

1:37:58

going to be a question of mine

1:38:00

>> somehow.

1:38:00

>> Not so much. Not so much. um

1:38:05

the low income. I'm trying to capture

1:38:09

the median. So, those that fall in the

1:38:12

middle that sometimes um don't have an

1:38:16

option for affordable housing. So, um

1:38:20

that would be in your discussions

1:38:23

um moving forward. Just remember that

1:38:26

catchall in the middle that sometimes um

1:38:30

is not eligible right for the low income

1:38:33

um

1:38:35

set aides and then

1:38:38

it they don't make enough for the um

1:38:41

higher rent range. So just keeping that

1:38:45

communication open around the rent I

1:38:47

think will be helpful for me. But um I

1:38:50

don't have any other questions. Thank

1:38:52

you for your updates.

1:38:56

Thank you. Um, Councilwoman Green or

1:38:58

Green,

1:38:59

>> don't worry. I I messed yours up

1:39:01

earlier, so you got me. I

1:39:05

>> um No. Um, I was just also going to uh

1:39:09

just the same sentiments as um President

1:39:12

Hill with the median income because

1:39:14

there are those those slight people in

1:39:16

the middle. I always say I've been one

1:39:18

of those who just um I don't get

1:39:20

approved for lower income, but I really

1:39:23

don't make enough for what they want me

1:39:25

to pay. So, just that little middle

1:39:26

person. So, just thank you again for

1:39:29

think rethinking those prices. Um and I

1:39:32

also wanted to say I I applaud you for

1:39:34

trying to find retail businesses, local

1:39:37

ones to come in. Um I think the grocery

1:39:40

store idea is great. We are in a food

1:39:42

desert as um Vice President Jones said.

1:39:44

So having that grocery store right there

1:39:46

helps a lot of um individuals, a lot of

1:39:49

people get to food and people who aren't

1:39:51

living in that building, people around

1:39:52

the neighborhood. So I think that's just

1:39:55

going to pump up our local businesses

1:39:57

and really help our residents. I know

1:39:59

you guys were looking for more ideas. So

1:40:01

I was over here thinking to definitely a

1:40:03

hairdresser. If you find one, just say

1:40:06

it helps. Um, but even with the gym, I

1:40:10

know you said that space was really

1:40:11

huge. So, if you can put an indoor track

1:40:13

within that gym, I think I know a lot of

1:40:16

people say, you know, there's isn't one

1:40:18

really. I mean, there is a talion lake

1:40:21

near there in a way. You can walk on

1:40:23

Front Street, but if you can't go

1:40:25

outside, I feel like an indoor track is

1:40:27

helpful. And then it also helps people

1:40:29

in the neighborhood to come in and use

1:40:31

those facilities, too, as you all let

1:40:34

them. So, I just wanted to throw out

1:40:36

some ideas and say thank you.

1:40:38

>> Can I touch on that?

1:40:39

>> Yeah, sure.

1:40:40

>> So,

1:40:42

regarding the grosser, you know, we also

1:40:44

don't want to be the the developer that

1:40:47

brings a grosser in from outside. That's

1:40:50

going to that's just going to fail

1:40:52

>> because they're not connected with the

1:40:54

community. They're too big. The the the

1:40:57

quality is not there. The prices are too

1:40:59

high. Like so this grosser we're excited

1:41:03

is that they have two locations. One is

1:41:06

about 3,000 square feet, one's about

1:41:09

2,000. So the combined of those two is

1:41:12

5,000. Like

1:41:14

>> this would probably be cheaper rent.

1:41:16

>> Right.

1:41:16

>> Honestly, and we're we're looking to try

1:41:18

to make it work. Like

1:41:20

>> Right. And like you said, they're local,

1:41:21

so people know them. They're connected

1:41:23

to the community. They know those needs.

1:41:25

So um that was really that's really

1:41:27

important. So, I think that's a great

1:41:29

idea.

1:41:30

>> So, I'm glad you all you I can see that.

1:41:33

So, thank you because it's a like you

1:41:34

said, it's a huge vacant building and to

1:41:36

leave it the way it is will bring more

1:41:38

crime. That's a fact. There's statistics

1:41:41

on that. More blighted buildings, more

1:41:44

crime. So, um

1:41:46

>> with the school, middle school,

1:41:48

>> right? The pendant. Yeah.

1:41:50

>> The old um v high school and then a

1:41:52

vocational school. So, I I just think

1:41:54

that um this is needed. So, just thank

1:41:57

you. Um, but that's it for me,

1:42:00

Councilman Lawson.

1:42:03

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

1:42:09

>> All right, Councilman Rodriguez.

1:42:10

>> Thank you, Chair Lawson. Um, it's

1:42:13

refreshing when developers come in front

1:42:15

of us and they listen. I'm not saying we

1:42:18

know all or have the recipe, but uh you

1:42:21

know, if you add up all the years that

1:42:23

you know, we've been residents in

1:42:24

Harrisburg, it's a pretty heavy weight,

1:42:26

you know, on this uh day, and it's just

1:42:29

it's refreshing that you take the ideas

1:42:31

and even if you can't, you try to work

1:42:32

them in. Um everything from the progress

1:42:34

chart to the community outreach update.

1:42:37

It's refreshing. A lot of times we ask

1:42:39

for this feedback. We ask for, you know,

1:42:40

have you done community outreach? You've

1:42:42

came with a whole table, right? And

1:42:44

showed how it goes on. Um, it's very

1:42:46

appreciative and it seems like to me

1:42:48

you're building an ecosystem where

1:42:50

families can work, eat, live, learn,

1:42:51

play all in one setting. Don't have to

1:42:54

travel too far. From the kind of setting

1:42:56

that you're putting together in the

1:42:57

team, you won't even need a car, you

1:42:59

know, really. You you'll be

1:43:00

selfestablished right where you are. And

1:43:02

and and that that's just pie in the sky.

1:43:04

That's amazing. Um, I know we previously

1:43:07

previously spoke about a jazz club. Is

1:43:09

that like out out the window?

1:43:12

I mean, honestly, the the Well,

1:43:16

>> I'm a I'm a huge jazz person myself. Um,

1:43:20

>> but I'm not going to sit here and shine

1:43:21

you on like

1:43:23

>> the neighbors are concerned about noise.

1:43:26

Now, if we can design it in like to a

1:43:28

restaurant where we I we I can't sit up

1:43:32

here and do something different than I

1:43:33

told the neighbors.

1:43:34

>> Absolutely.

1:43:35

Uh but if we can design it in like back

1:43:38

off the street and it's not going to be

1:43:41

a problem for the neighbors.

1:43:43

>> Yeah,

1:43:43

>> absolutely.

1:43:44

>> All day long.

1:43:44

>> And it's not like you said like a a

1:43:46

hip-hop forum where they'll be, you

1:43:48

know, artists coming and doing big

1:43:49

shows. Jazz is really kind of, you know,

1:43:52

sedated, lowkey. Um but it is up to

1:43:55

those residents in that area and their,

1:43:57

you know, uh thoughts and suggestions

1:43:58

nonetheless. But even the flex space

1:44:00

community rooms on each floor, you know,

1:44:02

where you're giving families the

1:44:04

opportunity to maybe celebrate birthdays

1:44:05

or have meeting spaces, you know,

1:44:08

community spaces, that that's huge. So,

1:44:10

um, thank you. And also, I'm very

1:44:11

appreciative that you kept your word

1:44:13

with the parking and allowing the

1:44:14

residents to park in the ample spaces,

1:44:16

you know, for anyone that needed help.

1:44:18

Um, one thing I did want to touch on and

1:44:20

I had a question for was the refues. I

1:44:22

know, um, trash was something that we

1:44:25

weren't too sure of where to keep units.

1:44:28

Um, has an inside incinerator ever been

1:44:31

thought of where families can just kind

1:44:32

of come in the hallway, pull the bin

1:44:34

down, throw the trash?

1:44:35

>> We have We have a trash shoot.

1:44:36

>> Oh, there is a shoot. Okay. Because I

1:44:38

know previously it was up in the air.

1:44:40

Wasn't really too sure where we keep the

1:44:41

bins and the black cans. And so the

1:44:44

chute is like the way we

1:44:46

>> It's in the design.

1:44:47

>> Oh, that' be amazing. I think that would

1:44:49

be amazing and the best way to go.

1:44:50

>> The only way to go. You can't rely on

1:44:53

anybody, you know, somebody. So, I have

1:44:57

partners that

1:44:59

tried to talk me out of it. Like,

1:45:01

>> they they're not apartment people. They

1:45:03

don't know. They just they're trying to

1:45:04

save a buck. Like, it's not going to

1:45:06

work cuz it's tight. This is a tight

1:45:08

project

1:45:08

>> and it's huge. And it's huge. And I know

1:45:11

growing up in um project facilities.

1:45:13

We've always had that floor to floor in

1:45:15

New Jersey. There's like 15 floors and

1:45:17

each floor you got that shoot, you throw

1:45:19

the trash down, done deal.

1:45:21

>> You have to make it and then you still

1:45:22

have to clean up. You still have to

1:45:24

>> and you can't get mad.

1:45:25

>> Yep.

1:45:25

>> Like you just got to do it.

1:45:26

>> Yep. No, I think that's a great idea and

1:45:28

and a great compromise and resolve

1:45:30

>> trash and track trash compactor

1:45:32

>> and that'll go straight down to like the

1:45:34

basement area.

1:45:34

>> It goes into the first floor where

1:45:36

there's a compactor and then that gets

1:45:37

picked up. What we have to work out is

1:45:39

whether or not it's a compactor with uh

1:45:41

public services, but

1:45:42

>> Gotcha.

1:45:43

>> There will be um trash shoot for sure.

1:45:46

100%.

1:45:46

>> Awesome. Well,

1:45:47

>> and 99 this is so building 3 is 99. This

1:45:50

is 131. So it adds to 230. Okay.

1:45:53

>> Um,

1:45:55

yeah, there'll probably be two in

1:45:56

building one.

1:45:57

>> That'd be amazing. That'd be amazing and

1:45:59

easier for maybe our seniors that may be

1:46:01

in there that can't go all the way

1:46:03

downstairs, dispose their trash, go all

1:46:04

the way back up. That'd be so

1:46:06

convenient. So, thank you for uh

1:46:08

listening and taking what we say and,

1:46:10

you know, and just kind of being

1:46:12

proactive with it all. So, thank you for

1:46:13

your presentation and thank you, Mr.

1:46:14

Jeff. That's all I have.

1:46:16

>> Thank you. And Councilwoman Davis.

1:46:19

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. And good

1:46:21

evening um again, Mr. Halquist. Good to

1:46:24

see you.

1:46:25

>> Good to see you.

1:46:27

>> I want to just make a statement in

1:46:30

regards to the grocery store. I used to

1:46:33

live in that neighborhood and I would

1:46:36

drive either to Camp Hill to Giant, to

1:46:40

Linglestown to Giant or out on 29th

1:46:44

Street to Giant to go to to get decent

1:46:47

food. Um, I remember the grocery store

1:46:50

that was there. There was a lot of

1:46:51

processed food, a lot of lowquality

1:46:54

food. And unfortunately, I don't think

1:46:57

everybody could go to the other grocery

1:47:00

stores. So, I would just um encourage

1:47:04

you to keep that in mind and I'm sure

1:47:06

you will just to have whole fresh foods

1:47:09

there for the for the neighborhood and

1:47:12

affordable hopefully also too. So you

1:47:16

said whole foods and you said whole

1:47:18

fresh foods.

1:47:21

>> Whole fresh foods.

1:47:22

>> Okay,

1:47:24

>> that's

1:47:26

Yeah, but that's all.

1:47:28

>> No, we will we'll we'll talk a little

1:47:30

bit more about that.

1:47:31

>> Okay. Thank you, Councilman Lawson.

1:47:33

That's it for me.

1:47:34

>> Thank you. Um, I'm going to uh like to

1:47:39

uh move resolution uh 5 uh 2026 to our

1:47:44

next le leg legislative session. And uh

1:47:47

this will and actually well I got a lot

1:47:50

of positive feedback, but I'm going to

1:47:51

ask my council members to support this

1:47:54

as well as as we look to move that to

1:47:56

the next legislative meeting and then

1:47:58

that would conclude the business for uh

1:48:02

economic development.

1:48:04

Thank you very much.

1:48:07

Our next committee business lies with

1:48:10

the public safety committee. I will

1:48:12

defer to our public safety committee

1:48:15

chair, Councilwoman Green, to lead

1:48:17

discussion.

1:48:19

>> Thank you very much. Uh the public

1:48:21

safety committee is going to discuss

1:48:23

resolution 1 of 2026. Mr. Humphre, if

1:48:26

you wouldn't mind reading the resolution

1:48:27

into the record.

1:48:29

Resolution 1 of 2026, a resolution

1:48:32

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

1:48:34

negotiate and enter into a professional

1:48:36

services agreement with WCA public

1:48:39

safety assessments for the purpose of

1:48:41

providing psychological testing and

1:48:43

assessment for the city's Bureau of

1:48:44

Police.

1:48:47

>> Thank you very much. If you wouldn't

1:48:48

mind introducing yourselves and then um

1:48:50

you can move forward with your

1:48:51

presentation and we'll open up for

1:48:52

questions afterwards. Don't try to dodge

1:48:54

the mic now.

1:48:55

>> I never dodged anything. He's not shy.

1:48:58

I'm not shy at all. Hello, city council

1:49:00

members. Welcome back to 2026 and uh I'm

1:49:04

Commissioner Thomas Carter and to my um

1:49:08

right is uh Deputy Chief Kenneth Young.

1:49:12

>> Good evening and thank you for having us

1:49:14

again. I'm Deputy Chief Young. Uh this

1:49:16

resolution is actually is an annual one

1:49:19

that we did last year. Actually, for the

1:49:20

last two years, if you remember before

1:49:22

that, for the ones that have been here

1:49:23

for a little bit, we used uh Dr. Laguna.

1:49:25

Um Dr. Laguna is no longer in business.

1:49:28

So, which is unfortunate and then to try

1:49:30

to find somebody that provides these

1:49:32

services in this area is rather

1:49:34

challenging. Um, so this is a resolution

1:49:37

to enter into uh to professional

1:49:40

services agreement with uh WCA uh public

1:49:43

safety assessment and what they are

1:49:45

offering or what we need from them would

1:49:47

be psychological services. I guess the

1:49:49

best way to explain what those services

1:49:51

are is if you look at exhibit A. Um it

1:49:55

gets into agreement and on the back side

1:49:58

it tells you what the what exactly these

1:50:00

services are for. So it would be uh for

1:50:02

post uh conditional offers of

1:50:04

psychological evaluation. So as part of

1:50:06

that hiring process they uh to get them

1:50:09

into the academy and to be certified

1:50:10

through the commonwealth we need to get

1:50:12

them a psychological evaluation on them.

1:50:15

So that's part of that service. Uh we

1:50:16

don't use the promotional evaluation but

1:50:19

that's something that that

1:50:21

we're going to begin to explore. I think

1:50:23

that's a valid option to see what uh to

1:50:26

see where they're at as far as that

1:50:28

goes. Fitness for duty evaluations,

1:50:30

wellness visits, the uh post-traumatic

1:50:32

stress uh disorder evaluations. Um and

1:50:36

then you got the specialized

1:50:37

evaluations. The ones that we use

1:50:39

typically the most would be the u uh

1:50:42

postcond conditional psychological

1:50:43

evaluations for any new hires, fitness

1:50:45

for duty, wellness, and then the uh PTSD

1:50:48

after critical events uh an evaluation

1:50:51

that uh that we're required to have. Uh

1:50:53

if we look at uh the rates from 25 into

1:50:57

uh this year, uh the fitness for duty

1:51:01

went up by $50 from 250 in 2025 to 300.

1:51:05

wellness went up um for uh from 200 to

1:51:09

250 and then the the the u the traumatic

1:51:12

um traumatic post-traumatic uh

1:51:16

evaluations went from 500 to 525 minor

1:51:19

increases um that uh that I mean there

1:51:24

it's standard when you get to to this

1:51:26

stuff.

1:51:30

>> Thank you very much. Um I don't have

1:51:32

many questions. Thank you for noting the

1:51:34

price increases. That was one thing that

1:51:35

I was going to note. Um, and just I

1:51:38

guess kind of a question, this is not

1:51:39

just used for police, it's used for fire

1:51:42

as well, correct? These services al also

1:51:43

used by the fire department.

1:51:45

>> This is just for the police department.

1:51:46

>> Okay. Because it says police, fire,

1:51:48

dispatch, postcond conditional

1:51:49

psychological evaluation.

1:51:51

>> Yeah, I think that's how he groups it

1:51:52

together.

1:51:53

>> Okay.

1:51:53

>> So, he he provides services. The WCA

1:51:56

specializes in in public safety. So, I

1:51:59

think that's just how he's outlining it

1:52:00

on the exhibit A, but we would just use

1:52:02

it for this would be just for police.

1:52:04

I'm not sure who the fire department

1:52:05

uses.

1:52:06

>> Okay. I'll have to follow up on that

1:52:07

because I know last year in the fire

1:52:09

department's um quarterly reports in

1:52:11

quarter 1, two, and three, they um note

1:52:14

the consultation fee by the same company

1:52:16

for their psychological evaluation. So,

1:52:18

I'll just follow up with them because I

1:52:20

think they do use the same company and

1:52:21

it's the same fee structure there.

1:52:22

>> Yeah, they're hard. There's if you look,

1:52:24

there's really not a whole lot of people

1:52:26

around that do this any longer. when we

1:52:28

lost our local connection with uh with

1:52:30

Dr. Lagona, this was the nearest place

1:52:33

that we could get. And they're fortunate

1:52:34

because a lot of the testing, we can

1:52:36

actually bring them here. We don't have

1:52:37

to send people to their to their office.

1:52:39

So, they're doing the prehire prehire

1:52:41

valuations. They do all that stuff here

1:52:43

for us.

1:52:45

>> Okay. Thank you. I don't have any other

1:52:47

questions regarding this resolution. I'm

1:52:50

going to open it up to my colleagues.

1:52:51

I'll start to my immediate right with

1:52:52

Councilman Lawson. Do you have any

1:52:54

questions for uh Deputy Chief Young or

1:52:56

Commissioner Carter?

1:52:58

>> I I do not have any any questions at

1:53:00

this time. Thank you.

1:53:03

>> Thank you. Um Vice President Jones, any

1:53:05

questions?

1:53:07

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. No

1:53:08

questions.

1:53:09

>> President Hill, any questions?

1:53:11

>> I don't have any questions. Thank you.

1:53:13

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

1:53:15

questions?

1:53:15

>> Good evening to you both. I just had a

1:53:17

really quick question just for

1:53:18

clarification. Um the pricing is it is

1:53:21

per officer per visit or just per

1:53:24

officer.

1:53:26

Um and it's just how many visits they go

1:53:29

for the

1:53:30

>> depends. Yep. Sorry. It depends on what

1:53:32

it is. Some of it's per hour.

1:53:34

>> You get into a fitness for duty

1:53:36

evaluation that's a couple hour test or

1:53:39

a uh a post-traumatic stress incident

1:53:41

that's a couple hours. So there's a

1:53:43

>> their hourly rate uh is what is what

1:53:46

they're is what's listed.

1:53:48

>> All right. Thank I just want that

1:53:49

clarification because we can hear

1:53:51

prices. No, no, you didn't do anything

1:53:53

wrong. But I think not just I but

1:53:55

public, you know, people who are

1:53:56

listening are here just wondering how

1:53:58

does is that like that's hourly, but not

1:54:00

knowing if it was like per officer

1:54:02

that's the one fee or

1:54:04

>> some of those take an hour. So really

1:54:05

that's what the fee is per hour. Some of

1:54:07

them are a little more in depth

1:54:09

depending on the circumstances of the

1:54:11

person being evaluated,

1:54:13

>> right? No, it's needed. I think that

1:54:15

this um is a service that we need just,

1:54:17

you know. So, thank you. That's it for

1:54:20

me.

1:54:21

>> Thank you, Council Member Rodriguez. Any

1:54:22

questions?

1:54:23

>> Um, always a pleasure to see you,

1:54:24

gentlemen. I have no questions. Thank

1:54:26

you.

1:54:26

>> Thank you.

1:54:27

>> Thank you very much. And Councilwoman

1:54:29

Davis, any questions?

1:54:31

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. Uh, good

1:54:33

evening, officers. No questions for me.

1:54:36

>> Thank you.

1:54:37

>> Thank you very much. As far as

1:54:38

resolution one, I'm going to recommend

1:54:40

this is moved to our next legislative

1:54:42

session agenda. But while we still have

1:54:44

you guys here, um I know I did speak

1:54:46

with Commissioner Carter about some

1:54:48

concerns the residents had uh as far as

1:54:50

ICE agents in the city and if the city

1:54:52

has any formalized agreement with uh the

1:54:54

department. So if you could just speak

1:54:56

to that, I'd appreciate it.

1:55:00

>> Back in uh

1:55:05

back in the early 2000s, u we did have

1:55:08

one.

1:55:10

Uh we have not

1:55:13

I can't say we have not worked with ICE

1:55:16

because if we come across a traffic stop

1:55:18

and if somebody is warned by any federal

1:55:21

entity then we're obligated to contact

1:55:25

that agency.

1:55:27

Uh I believe that we have done a couple

1:55:30

traffic stops and um there was a

1:55:34

detainer by ICE so we had to contact ICE

1:55:36

to come and pick up that person. As far

1:55:39

as going on any raids or anything with

1:55:42

ICE. We have not done that. And the

1:55:45

responsibility that we have is to stand

1:55:49

by. We're not going on raids with them.

1:55:52

But uh we can't let anything happen to a

1:55:54

nice agent because they're federal

1:55:56

agents and they're police officers

1:55:58

officers too. But as far as going on

1:56:00

raids, no, we don't do that.

1:56:03

I did hear that they were at the farm

1:56:05

show, but we had nothing to do with that

1:56:08

and they were middle somewhere like

1:56:10

that, you know, according to Facebook

1:56:12

and and things like that, but we had

1:56:14

nothing to do with that.

1:56:17

>> So, just just so we're clear, I mean,

1:56:19

they're not calling us and telling us

1:56:21

where they're at within the city when

1:56:22

they get here. So, a lot of times how

1:56:25

we're coming across that is that uh

1:56:27

either we're running across them when

1:56:29

we're out handling calls and and

1:56:31

patrolling districts or they call to

1:56:34

say, you know, something's wrong um that

1:56:37

we get there. has that happened? I don't

1:56:39

know of any incidents where that's

1:56:41

happened, but I'd have to check that

1:56:42

out. But yeah, we're not we're not going

1:56:45

like we're not teaming up with them.

1:56:46

There's no information exchange. There's

1:56:48

none of that going on.

1:56:51

>> Thank you very much. I just uh thought

1:56:52

that that was a conversation we should

1:56:54

have because it was brought up last

1:56:55

meeting and I know several residents

1:56:56

have wretched out about it. Uh anybody

1:56:58

else have any questions or comments

1:57:00

regarding it?

1:57:02

>> I'll start with Councilman Lawson. just

1:57:04

just the question just because I I I I'm

1:57:07

trying to wrap my head around how these

1:57:09

things work. So if we're not working

1:57:12

with them, how do we protect our our

1:57:17

citizens? And I'm not saying to protect

1:57:19

from any lawful activity happening

1:57:23

through ICE, but if situations become to

1:57:26

the point where we do need uh police

1:57:30

protection for for residents, whether it

1:57:33

be through bystanders or just as we saw

1:57:37

what happened with Min Minnesota,

1:57:39

someone getting in a situation to where

1:57:42

it becomes a a a dangerous situation.

1:57:44

How how do we walk that line there? And

1:57:47

it's it and there may not be an answer,

1:57:49

but I'm just I'm sure everyone wonders

1:57:51

how do we how do we work in a situation

1:57:54

like this where we can keep our

1:57:55

residents safe while,

1:57:59

you know, we have

1:58:01

forces coming from the federal a side

1:58:04

that we may not have control over.

1:58:08

>> The Minnesota situation is an

1:58:11

unfortunate

1:58:12

incident. There are many incidents right

1:58:14

now that are going on nationwide that

1:58:16

law enforcement, local law for

1:58:19

enforcement has no no control over and

1:58:23

no power over. I would advise our

1:58:25

citizens that if they are stopped by

1:58:27

ICE, just cooperate

1:58:30

because if we don't cooperate then

1:58:32

matters will just get worse. We are not

1:58:34

going to stand by and let ice beat on

1:58:37

anybody or anything like that, you know,

1:58:40

but you know, we don't want to get into

1:58:42

a confrontation with them either

1:58:44

because, you know, if that happens, no

1:58:47

one wins,

1:58:49

you know. So, I would just advise them

1:58:52

to give the ID to cooperate and usually

1:58:55

when ICE when they're in a area,

1:58:59

they know who they are after. They have

1:59:01

pictures of them and everything like

1:59:03

that. it doesn't go rolling into a

1:59:05

neighborhood and don't know who they're

1:59:08

looking for. So, um, if ice rolls up on

1:59:12

the hill or up town or the southside, I

1:59:15

would advise our citizens to cooperate.

1:59:19

Don't start anything. Just do what they

1:59:21

asked them to do because the Minnesota

1:59:23

situation, you know, there's been a

1:59:25

couple other situations like that, too.

1:59:28

And, um, it's just sad. It's just sad.

1:59:33

anything.

1:59:36

>> Thank you, uh, Vice President Jones.

1:59:38

>> Yeah. Uh, thank you guys and thank you,

1:59:40

uh, Councilwoman Green for, um, bringing

1:59:42

that up. Uh, one of the things that we

1:59:44

are looking at, and again, for thatou,

1:59:47

it wasn't it really wasn't a resolution.

1:59:49

Um, and I think there is a huge

1:59:51

difference between the two. I think, um,

1:59:53

we are looking at legislation right now

1:59:55

to to to, uh, put in place a resolution

1:59:58

versus aou. Um, hopefully we can get

2:00:01

this through legal. I think uh myself,

2:00:03

Councilwoman Ross and Mr. Lawson and

2:00:06

also Councilwoman Green um are looking

2:00:08

at this um to adopt this legislation to

2:00:11

bring it into effect. And I do

2:00:13

understand that you guys have a a duty

2:00:16

um to not interfere with with the

2:00:20

federal uh government. And one thing

2:00:22

that I would appreciate that you said is

2:00:24

that you won't stand around and watch

2:00:26

them beat on our residents. So that was

2:00:28

a good thing that that we have that. But

2:00:29

I think this piece of legislation is um

2:00:32

important to give that um that feel of

2:00:36

protection for our residents um

2:00:39

documented, undocumented, however that

2:00:41

may be. But uh and to your point, they

2:00:44

did go around um on Liberty Street. They

2:00:46

were going around just knocking on doors

2:00:48

and asking people, "Hey, who lives next

2:00:50

door?" So um you guys may not be aware

2:00:52

of that, but that did actually take

2:00:54

place um within the last week. So, they

2:00:57

are I don't know how they're getting

2:00:59

this information. That's one of the

2:01:00

things that um I think the people are

2:01:02

very concerned about, but it's good to

2:01:04

hear that you guys aren't sharing that

2:01:06

information. And um when they got to do

2:01:09

certain things, I do understand and I

2:01:11

hope that our public understands that

2:01:13

you guys have to comply or deal with

2:01:16

those consequences on a federal level.

2:01:18

So, um that's just my input on this.

2:01:21

Thank you.

2:01:22

>> Thank you.

2:01:23

>> Thank you very much, Councilwoman Ross.

2:01:26

Um, I just wanted to say, you know, um,

2:01:28

thank you for giving us some insight on,

2:01:32

um, what the process is with ICE, that

2:01:34

you're not working with them, that of

2:01:36

course you wouldn't let them hurt any of

2:01:37

our residents, but um, how you do

2:01:39

sometimes have if you had to answer a

2:01:42

call um, because traffic stops or

2:01:46

whatnot that um, that would be something

2:01:48

or reason you would notify them, but

2:01:51

you're not willingly give them giving

2:01:53

them information. And I think that's

2:01:54

what a lot of our residents were worried

2:01:57

about. And as you stated, Chief Carter,

2:01:59

there may have been something on the

2:02:01

books in the early 2000s, but of now, we

2:02:04

don't have anything set. And I think

2:02:06

that's important for our city, just for

2:02:08

our residents to feel safe. Not taking

2:02:10

any positions on if we agree or

2:02:12

disagree, but making sure our residents

2:02:14

are safe because I think um what we do

2:02:17

see on TV right now are um citizens are

2:02:21

getting hurt. residents of those

2:02:23

communities are getting hurt, not um

2:02:26

people who we want to um put in boxes of

2:02:29

being legal or illegal, but it is

2:02:31

residents of those communities, United

2:02:33

States residents are being hurt or um

2:02:36

unfortunately losing their lives. So,

2:02:39

just having something set and I know we

2:02:41

have all been trying to look at some

2:02:42

type of um resolution um that would

2:02:46

could come down that could put just some

2:02:48

things in place to help us all out. So,

2:02:50

I thank you both for speaking on that

2:02:52

and I thank you um Councilwoman Green

2:02:54

for bringing that up tonight and looking

2:02:56

into that for not just us but for our

2:02:58

residents. So, that was it for me and

2:03:00

thank you again.

2:03:01

>> Thank you.

2:03:02

>> Thank you all for being here and thank

2:03:04

you for taking the time to answer that

2:03:05

question. Um as I said, I'm going to ask

2:03:08

that resolution 1226 be moved to our

2:03:10

legislative session agenda and thank you

2:03:12

all for everything that you do for um

2:03:14

all of us because we're residents as

2:03:16

well. I think sometimes people forget

2:03:17

that that we live here. Um, so thank you

2:03:19

for, you know, being there for our

2:03:21

residents in every way possible. Uh,

2:03:23

look forward to working with you guys to

2:03:25

continue to work. Thank you.

2:03:26

>> Thank you.

2:03:29

>> Thank you.

2:03:30

Our final committee business this

2:03:33

evening lies with the parks, recreation,

2:03:35

and enrichment committee. I will defer

2:03:38

to our parks, recreation, and enrichment

2:03:40

committee chair, Councilwoman Woman RWS,

2:03:44

to lead discussion.

2:03:45

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, Mr. Mr.

2:03:48

Humphre, can you please read resolution

2:03:50

2 of 2026? And

2:03:52

>> resolution 2 of 2026, a resolution

2:03:55

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

2:03:57

negotiate and enter into a professional

2:03:59

services agreement with Flora Teter

2:04:02

Landscape Architects Incorporated to

2:04:04

provide landscape architectural services

2:04:06

for Vernon Street Park and Playground

2:04:08

located at 15th Street and Vernon

2:04:10

Street.

2:04:11

>> Thank you very much, Mr. Humphrey. And I

2:04:13

see we have two members from the

2:04:15

administration here to speak with us.

2:04:17

Um, please give us your name and your

2:04:19

title. Thank you.

2:04:21

>> I'm Sasha Rose, deputy director for

2:04:22

parks.

2:04:24

>> Kevin Sanders, parks and rec manager.

2:04:26

>> Thank you very much. And can you all

2:04:28

please give us some information on uh

2:04:32

this resolution?

2:04:34

>> Yes,

2:04:36

I sent over some slides uh more

2:04:38

recently.

2:04:40

>> Can you please move the microphone

2:04:42

closer to you?

2:04:43

>> Pulled over some I sent over some

2:04:45

slides. Thank you,

2:04:47

>> Mr. Cedric.

2:04:48

>> And you can it can like go right next to

2:04:50

you. I think it's it's very movable.

2:04:55

>> Okay.

2:05:00

>> Did you just send them recently?

2:05:02

>> Like

2:05:04

>> down here?

2:05:11

>> I don't have them, but we can hook your

2:05:13

laptop up.

2:05:20

Yep.

2:05:47

And while we're waiting, when you get a

2:05:48

chance, can you email me those slides as

2:05:50

well, too? Thank you.

2:05:53

Oh, and anybody else from council?

2:05:57

I Okay, you can send them to everybody,

2:05:59

please, when you get a chance. Can you

2:06:01

let them know, please? Thank you.

2:06:14

>> It's not going to allow your computer to

2:06:17

run the the program.

2:06:57

Okay.

2:07:02

You see it?

2:07:18

The slides will make it easier. I'll

2:07:20

make it quick. All right. So for 15th in

2:07:23

Vernon um we're looking to um basically

2:07:28

do a um

2:07:31

project there but the first step is to

2:07:35

apply for a grant. So we are requesting

2:07:38

uh council approval to do that. We did

2:07:41

do a RFQ for this process. We had a few

2:07:46

different uh consultants. We met with

2:07:47

them via Zoom. Um myself, other members

2:07:51

of the team. Um, so where we discovered

2:07:55

um, Floral Teeter, it's a little bit

2:07:58

more twofold. We have had other projects

2:08:01

where we've had different consultants

2:08:03

submit proposals. So that's where Foral

2:08:05

Teter came from initially. Uh, we did

2:08:08

like their proposal for the current

2:08:09

projects that we are working on, but

2:08:11

they weren't selected. Um, so we just

2:08:14

put like a poll together also from the

2:08:18

trade shows um, parks and recreation.

2:08:21

So, we try to give people opportunities

2:08:24

from different places. Um, some are

2:08:26

local, some are um in more urban areas.

2:08:29

So, foral ter while they're we like

2:08:32

that. Um, two of the other vendors also

2:08:35

had experience in there, but we are

2:08:38

leaning our group decided to go with

2:08:40

furl ter.

2:08:44

Um so basically at Fural Teter over the

2:08:47

probably last five years the community

2:08:49

and parks and wreck we have discussed

2:08:52

doing a project there at various times.

2:08:54

Um it just hasn't come to life for a

2:08:57

variety of reasons. Finances probably

2:09:00

are the most

2:09:02

important part of that aspect. Um and

2:09:05

just uh some shifting in priorities and

2:09:07

opportunities that obviously have come

2:09:09

through sort of put 15th Vern in more of

2:09:12

a stand still excuse me if you will. Uh

2:09:15

some of the goals are to improve park

2:09:17

functionality, enhance the recreation

2:09:19

space, maximize the use. It is a small

2:09:22

spot uh but also ensuring inclusivity

2:09:26

and sustainable design. Uh currently at

2:09:28

the park there are some issues there

2:09:30

with inclusivity which we are aware of.

2:09:33

Um but also the play equipment is um

2:09:37

aging out. It's over shelf life. Um it's

2:09:40

not the only park that is like this but

2:09:42

is one that is probably at the highest

2:09:45

priority in the next group outside of

2:09:48

shop. Shop's more of a replacement of

2:09:50

equipment but 15 needs a little bit more

2:09:53

actual work um to the site.

2:09:59

Um so just kind of brainstormed around

2:10:02

like I said that the RFQ

2:10:04

um where we got we had multiple

2:10:07

proposals. Um we did evaluate based on

2:10:10

ability to optimize uh small urban

2:10:12

spaces experience with urban parks or

2:10:15

likewise. Um so some of our examples are

2:10:20

schools as well as not just an urban

2:10:22

park but who impacting is still the same

2:10:25

uh young children. Um design innovation

2:10:29

and storm water. Uh we've been able to

2:10:31

actually firsthand inspect some of this

2:10:34

with rural ter and a separate u set of

2:10:38

uh projects by sort of just asking lots

2:10:41

of questions of the consultant group and

2:10:44

studying their website.

2:10:47

So during more intrusive discovery which

2:10:51

isn't in this um to get the storm water

2:10:53

we did see some other work that they did

2:10:56

which is on a separate project that we

2:10:58

were eyeing up which is something that

2:11:00

you guys want to talk about which we'll

2:11:02

talk about second. Um so notable on

2:11:06

their website uh they have did some work

2:11:10

at the Frank elementary school and

2:11:13

Baltimore the Shelby uh community park

2:11:16

and there's elementary school. So, some

2:11:19

are Maryland and then some Philadelphia

2:11:22

um or one Philadelphia. They have a lot

2:11:24

of experience in different areas. They

2:11:26

also have a um team in Pittsburgh. They

2:11:30

have a team in Philly and team in

2:11:32

Baltimore.

2:11:37

Some of the strong alignment with the

2:11:38

project goals uh for the urban space. Um

2:11:42

one thing that's not on there, it is a

2:11:44

womanowned company.

2:11:47

And then we really thought that these

2:11:50

two sites were very successful.

2:11:56

This is a picture of Hamilton Elementary

2:11:58

School.

2:12:00

And then there's there's more of a

2:12:01

breakdown on our website on how they

2:12:03

came to these projects just for more

2:12:05

insight as well.

2:12:09

This one's a pretty tight space. This is

2:12:12

actually a lot smaller than 15th of

2:12:13

Vernon, but this just gives a little bit

2:12:16

of mental insight of how the team was

2:12:19

sort of thinking about 15th of Vernon,

2:12:22

like how we can really max out all of

2:12:24

it. Not just the way we think of it, but

2:12:27

maybe how they might think of it mixed

2:12:29

in with how the community wants it.

2:12:35

Uh so for this scope essentially this is

2:12:38

to help us with the the grant

2:12:40

application. It's part of the DCMR

2:12:43

application process.

2:12:45

Um consultant gave different budgets. Uh

2:12:49

theirs was actually the lowest. Um it

2:12:52

also includes uh surveying which we

2:12:55

traditionally hadn't done at this phase

2:12:57

but we found that we kind of need to do

2:12:59

that up front um because this will

2:13:02

minimize some issues that we've had um

2:13:05

beyond the planning stage and

2:13:06

implementation. Sometimes we skip that

2:13:09

and then we do it later and then ends up

2:13:12

messing up some of the ideas and

2:13:14

concepts.

2:13:17

One thing we do know is what we for this

2:13:19

one we'd have to have community

2:13:21

involvement also as part of the DCMR

2:13:24

process which includes at least two

2:13:27

meetings for the community.

2:13:38

>> Okay. I was waiting for your I didn't

2:13:40

know I was going to ask. Okay. Thank

2:13:42

you. Um,

2:13:47

I don't have any questions right now on

2:13:49

this exact um, project. Um, the

2:13:53

slideshow did help with um, some of the

2:13:55

questions I may have had. I think more

2:13:58

so I'm just looking forward to seeing

2:13:59

what they do, making sure we stay on our

2:14:02

timeline. Um, because I know a lot of

2:14:05

residents have had questions and I've

2:14:07

contacted both of you with emails about

2:14:10

um, the parks that are currently being

2:14:11

updated. are we going to meet the

2:14:13

deadlines, what the extensions are

2:14:14

looking like. So, I think just making

2:14:16

sure we're staying in um which I know

2:14:19

we're saying compliance with those, but

2:14:21

um from the perception it was is we

2:14:23

weren't, which is why a lot of people

2:14:25

had questions with are we going to meet

2:14:27

that? Do we so we don't have to give

2:14:29

money back. So, I think just making sure

2:14:31

we stay with these timelines, keeping us

2:14:34

updated to make sure because we know it

2:14:36

can be hard work with updating

2:14:37

playgrounds and you can't really do it

2:14:39

in the winter time.

2:14:41

Um, I think my biggest, so it kind of

2:14:45

does go with this project. Um, but not

2:14:48

but it does because I think one of the

2:14:51

things I want to make sure is we have

2:14:52

benches under our pavilions. Um, as we

2:14:55

are going to update this playground and

2:14:57

the other ones that we are one thing

2:14:59

that I've noticed throughout the

2:15:00

playgrounds in the city and I think I've

2:15:02

at least I spoke to you, Mr. Saunders

2:15:04

about it is just I've been to many

2:15:06

playgrounds where there are no benches

2:15:08

under the pavilions or there's just one

2:15:10

bench but it's out in the sun and I mean

2:15:13

I don't want to be cooking while

2:15:14

watching my kids play. You know, I would

2:15:16

like some type of shade. Um and so I

2:15:20

think like just making sure that that is

2:15:23

there. Um I think thinking about what

2:15:25

the residents want um is important. Like

2:15:28

you said, you're going to be having the

2:15:29

two community meetings. So, um, like I

2:15:32

said, I don't particularly have any

2:15:33

questions. Just making sure as we're

2:15:35

going through this process. We're making

2:15:37

those playgrounds in a space where, um,

2:15:40

people can sit, participate, but most

2:15:44

importantly is what the residents are

2:15:46

asking for um, or trying to come to some

2:15:49

type of compromise. They can't get

2:15:51

everything, but like how can we meet

2:15:53

them in the middle? Um, and just one

2:15:55

last thing and then I do want I know my

2:15:57

colleagues have questions. Um, I don't

2:16:01

know what it looks like for I hope we do

2:16:04

get some spray park systems. That's

2:16:07

since I've been on council that's like a

2:16:08

big thing for me. Spray pad, spray park,

2:16:12

like another place where residents can

2:16:16

be near water, can play in water.

2:16:19

Everybody's not going to go to the pool.

2:16:21

Um, so I think as we update these

2:16:23

playgrounds and Vernon Street, just

2:16:25

thinking about that concept, which I did

2:16:27

see one of the pictures up there, I know

2:16:29

it wasn't our park, but showing how um

2:16:32

Teter does work with small areas and I

2:16:34

saw that that was one of the things that

2:16:35

they had there. Um, so, you know, just

2:16:38

just making sure that that is um a part

2:16:42

of a plan or at least thinking of it.

2:16:45

Um, so I'll start down to my far right

2:16:47

with um, Councilwoman Lawson. Do you

2:16:50

have any questions?

2:16:53

>> Thank you, Chair Ross. Um,

2:16:55

>> the I think the slide may have answered

2:16:58

it. I saw the the budget of of 19,000,

2:17:00

but then I see deliverables are the

2:17:02

plans basically. U, uh, we're we're

2:17:04

we're paying them for the, uh, the

2:17:06

concept at this point, and we'll get a a

2:17:10

larger budget, I I suppose, once we get

2:17:12

that plan straightened out. Um you did

2:17:16

note that they were the the lowest uh

2:17:19

cost. Was that the reason for the

2:17:21

selection or or was it for their overall

2:17:23

work?

2:17:24

>> Uh in this mode we what we kind of got

2:17:28

into was who we think can deliver us the

2:17:33

concept the best way for the grant

2:17:35

application. And that and then if

2:17:38

everything works out and we get the

2:17:40

grant, we would potentially go back with

2:17:42

them. You don't have to, but ideally you

2:17:45

want to go back to this. We're using

2:17:48

utilizing them for a service right now

2:17:50

to help us develop our grant and provide

2:17:53

concepts there. That way, they're not

2:17:55

looking like we just drew them, but

2:17:57

they're actual concepts that would go in

2:17:59

the park. I think there is getting

2:18:01

community feedback and things like that.

2:18:04

Actual designs. They're not the final

2:18:06

designs or anything like that at this

2:18:07

phase, even when they're done. That

2:18:09

would come after we got the grant

2:18:12

approved. We have money to change up

2:18:15

those things.

2:18:16

>> Okay. And then you you did get them

2:18:18

because you like their work product and

2:18:20

not just because they were the lowest

2:18:21

cost. That's correct.

2:18:22

>> Yeah. We actually really weren't focused

2:18:24

on their cost. Okay. At all. We really

2:18:26

focused on what we thought they could

2:18:28

what group could do the best.

2:18:30

>> Okay. Great. Thank you very much. That's

2:18:32

that's exactly what I wanted to know.

2:18:33

>> Thank you.

2:18:35

>> All right. Uh Councilwoman Green,

2:18:38

>> thank you very much. I don't have any

2:18:39

questions.

2:18:41

Vice President Jones.

2:18:43

>> Thank you. Thank you guys for your

2:18:44

presentation. Um I know Councilwoman

2:18:46

Ross uh pretty much touched on it, but I

2:18:49

would ask you to expound on um the

2:18:51

timelines. Um I'm talking about the

2:18:53

parks in general from 7th Reservoir. Um

2:18:57

I know when the one time you guys came

2:18:59

in front of us, um we were kind of

2:19:00

pushing it and again if there was an

2:19:02

extension just so the residents can

2:19:04

actually hear that process.

2:19:07

>> Sure. So for that project um 7th and

2:19:11

Rner Gorgus Reservoir Park and um Wilson

2:19:17

Park we did have an another extension

2:19:19

till for 33 of 2026

2:19:24

and that's recent.

2:19:25

>> Okay.

2:19:26

>> Um we realized that we weren't going to

2:19:29

finish um for a variety of reasons. Um,

2:19:33

reservoir's still going to have some

2:19:35

issues finishing. Um, but we do think

2:19:38

we'll be able to get

2:19:39

>> no clawbacks. No clawbacks.

2:19:41

>> Yeah.

2:19:42

>> Outside of reservoir, I I can't really

2:19:44

speak to things. Okay.

2:19:45

>> Is very um difficult.

2:19:48

>> Yeah. Uh my other question is with the

2:19:51

Vernon Street project, um you know, that

2:19:53

that design looked pretty good. My

2:19:56

concern is the streets, Vernon Street

2:19:58

itself, the one coming out of

2:20:01

>> Mayflower. You talking about the alley?

2:20:03

>> The alleyway definitely for sure. That's

2:20:05

you know Axel Bendon Road there. Uh

2:20:10

>> coming out of Hamilton Health Center.

2:20:13

That that one too. That's 15th is it?

2:20:15

>> Yeah,

2:20:16

>> that would No, that'd be 15 17th. Yeah.

2:20:19

So just surrounding that area, are we

2:20:21

working with public works to to pave

2:20:23

those areas once this project again? I

2:20:25

mean it should have been done honestly

2:20:27

but um because people actually utilize

2:20:29

that space and I know this isn't your

2:20:31

question. I'm I mean for you for your

2:20:33

department but I'm asking are you guys

2:20:35

collaborating or looking at that along

2:20:38

with this project because I think that

2:20:39

would be an issue so people can safely

2:20:41

pull up drop kids off and you know

2:20:46

>> we can talk to John Watson about that

2:20:48

stuff. Okay.

2:20:49

>> It's it's twofold. Um, so on the road

2:20:54

where the alley is, the walkway has been

2:20:56

washed away for about 10 years. So the

2:21:00

wall that's at the park, we installed a

2:21:03

wall in 2017

2:21:05

and brown this actually late December of

2:21:08

that year and part of it starting to to

2:21:11

give. So if some of the storm water this

2:21:15

that would come into play here is taken

2:21:16

care of, they'll actually

2:21:19

should level the road off some, not but

2:21:23

also more of a consistent flow of water

2:21:27

so it's draining correctly. And if you

2:21:29

look at the um the grate that's out

2:21:32

there with the um the sewer, the

2:21:34

lateral, some of those things need fixed

2:21:36

and then the cross works need fixed. So

2:21:39

these are things that are could be fair

2:21:41

game. It's just they have to sort of

2:21:43

kind of come into the inclusivity part

2:21:46

and access going over to Hamilton.

2:21:49

um could play a role, but it's really

2:21:51

going to be road to road as opposed to

2:21:53

Hamilton Health. There's no walkway over

2:21:55

there.

2:21:56

>> No, I'm just saying just

2:21:58

>> but all it's all one thing. It's not

2:22:00

like they're you're trying to make the

2:22:02

road safe, but you're also trying to

2:22:04

storm water at the same time.

2:22:06

>> So, I understand that like the the

2:22:08

dynamics may not seem that way, but that

2:22:10

alley you need everything needs to be

2:22:12

tightened up.

2:22:13

>> Well, that's that's pretty much

2:22:16

>> but we have to make From a grant

2:22:18

standpoint, it has to make grant sense

2:22:20

for the park, too.

2:22:21

>> Right. But that's why I was asking is

2:22:23

there going to be You said you would

2:22:24

talk to Mr. Watson. Yes.

2:22:26

>> Right.

2:22:27

>> That's it.

2:22:27

>> We're going to try to make it into the

2:22:28

grant. So the covers

2:22:30

>> Well, I mean, we have our own equipment.

2:22:31

So, we can we can do some black topping

2:22:33

over there. So, you know,

2:22:35

>> a little more in black top.

2:22:36

>> I know. I mean, you you got Yeah, you

2:22:37

have deep holes over there.

2:22:39

>> Oh, yeah.

2:22:40

>> So, yeah. I don't know. I was just

2:22:41

asking a question. It didn't really fall

2:22:43

on you guys' department. And I was just

2:22:44

hoping we were thinking about this

2:22:45

because it's been a bad area for some

2:22:48

time.

2:22:48

>> Thank you.

2:22:48

>> I'll make sure it's on radar.

2:22:50

>> Thank you. I know.

2:22:51

>> You mean the old road? Not just by the

2:22:53

park.

2:22:53

>> N Yeah. Yeah. That whole square right

2:22:57

there is bad.

2:22:58

>> All the way up.

2:22:59

>> Yeah.

2:23:00

>> Yes.

2:23:00

>> All right. To 15th, 14th. Thank you.

2:23:04

>> Yeah. Gotcha.

2:23:06

>> And do you have any questions, President

2:23:08

Hill?

2:23:09

>> Um, yes. Thank you. So, in reference to

2:23:11

resolution two, I'm excited to see I I'm

2:23:14

hopeful that um the plan that will be

2:23:17

developed will be great. I like the

2:23:20

images that I saw from the other cities

2:23:23

and I like that there are at least two

2:23:26

community meetings built in um on behalf

2:23:29

of DCNR. So, I think that's exciting. Um

2:23:33

in reference to resolution three of

2:23:36

2026, I asked Mr. McCutchen earlier. Um,

2:23:40

can you speak to the pool improvements

2:23:43

funding or the limited amount that was

2:23:46

expended so far on phase one?

2:23:49

>> Yes. So, we're still waiting for the

2:23:52

consultant to finish a scientific study.

2:23:54

Okay.

2:23:54

>> At um Paul all manner.

2:23:57

>> Um there

2:23:59

after talking to Lamont, there did seem

2:24:02

to be some goofy things that he said

2:24:04

come correct. So, we've had some things

2:24:06

go down. So, we were waiting for the

2:24:09

scientific study to be a little bit more

2:24:11

expanded upon with um there's like some

2:24:14

brown water and um we don't necessarily

2:24:18

it's not like sinkhole, but we just got

2:24:20

to make sure that we can actually build

2:24:22

a pool there.

2:24:23

>> Okay.

2:24:23

>> So, those things sort of kind of went a

2:24:26

little stagnant after our last council

2:24:28

visit.

2:24:28

>> Oh, I see.

2:24:29

>> Waiting for the team to get back to us.

2:24:31

>> Okay.

2:24:32

>> Was delayed a little bit.

2:24:33

>> When do you anticipate

2:24:36

um So

2:24:37

>> hearing back from them maybe the during

2:24:39

the first quarter

2:24:41

>> it'll be in the first quarter.

2:24:42

>> Okay.

2:24:42

>> Um our every other weekend or Thursday

2:24:45

every other week or Thursday. So the

2:24:47

last Thursday they had to go out and do

2:24:49

a little bit more work.

2:24:50

>> Okay. Okay.

2:24:51

>> We are we are really probing them. It's

2:24:54

not just us as facilities. We're we're

2:24:56

all on the same call. We're really

2:24:57

probing.

2:24:58

>> Okay.

2:24:58

>> Can we or can we do it? So it slowed us

2:25:00

down. We had steam and we sort of lost a

2:25:03

little steam. So

2:25:04

>> Okay. Okay. Well, I hope we reboot and

2:25:07

get some more steam there. And then my

2:25:09

final question is around the other

2:25:11

programs, the extension that was granted

2:25:14

until March 3rd.

2:25:16

>> Um, do you believe that that is a

2:25:18

reasonable

2:25:20

deadline at this point? Do you

2:25:22

anticipate an additional request of an

2:25:25

extension or

2:25:26

>> We don't anticipate another request. We

2:25:28

we have went as far as we could at

2:25:30

things weather related. Um it's a kind

2:25:34

of a daily conversation. Um we are

2:25:36

meeting with one of the vendors

2:25:38

specifically each week to sort of go

2:25:41

faster. Um they did they're out there

2:25:43

working now. They they were a little bit

2:25:45

behind but they may have slowed down

2:25:47

some of the other groups from being able

2:25:50

to complete their work. So while we got

2:25:53

that extension that will help us get us

2:25:56

closer to 95% across the board. Um

2:25:59

there's one concern that we just might

2:26:02

not be able to do a playground on time

2:26:04

of March 3rd.

2:26:06

>> Okay.

2:26:06

>> Not saying it won't get up in March.

2:26:08

This won't be open up on March 3rd.

2:26:10

>> Okay.

2:26:10

>> Yeah, I do think we'll get done with

2:26:12

just the dates.

2:26:14

>> Okay. Well, thank you for the updates. I

2:26:16

don't have any other questions.

2:26:19

>> Thank you, President Hill. Uh,

2:26:21

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:26:23

>> Uh, thank you both for joining us this

2:26:25

evening. Um, I have no questions. just I

2:26:28

get very happy when any work is uh being

2:26:31

looked to do on Allison Hill. Sometimes

2:26:33

it's overlooked and um not saying it's

2:26:36

due to anyone intentionally doing that.

2:26:38

It's just the way the grant processes

2:26:40

work. Sometimes they identify more

2:26:42

pertinent areas what they deem more

2:26:44

pertinent. So anytime work um is being

2:26:46

done for the families of Allison Hill,

2:26:49

South Allison Hill, it's just, you know,

2:26:50

a joyous occasion. So I look forward to

2:26:52

seeing the park, you know, um fulfilled

2:26:55

and completed. I grew up on 16th in

2:26:57

Chestnut, so you know, I got a lot of

2:26:59

bumps and bruises right there on that

2:27:01

street. So, um, I look forward to seeing

2:27:03

it and thank you both for your work.

2:27:08

>> Uh, do you have any questions,

2:27:09

Councilwoman Davis?

2:27:11

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Thank you

2:27:13

both for being here this evening and

2:27:16

thank you for everything that you're

2:27:17

doing to upgrade our parks and make them

2:27:20

safe. Um, I'm thinking about

2:27:24

this particular playground and I believe

2:27:27

if my memory serves me correctly,

2:27:31

the

2:27:33

perimeter around the playground,

2:27:36

especially right there where that alley

2:27:38

is, there's nothing there right now. Am

2:27:42

I correct?

2:27:44

>> H,

2:27:45

>> there's um homes there.

2:27:47

>> No, the alley. the alley behind I mean

2:27:50

right there alongside of the playground

2:27:53

like there's not a fence or a wall or

2:27:56

anything there. I don't think

2:27:58

>> there's a wall.

2:27:59

>> So you said the wall is

2:28:01

>> the wall. Okay. Is there

2:28:03

>> and then there's a wall and then there's

2:28:06

like steps.

2:28:07

>> Okay. And but you mentioned the wall is

2:28:09

falling down.

2:28:11

>> Yeah. It's gonna it's was it wasn't

2:28:14

temporary but we got about 10 years out

2:28:16

of it.

2:28:17

>> Okay. Yeah. I was just trying to

2:28:18

remember. I do remember going through

2:28:21

that area and saying to myself, "Oh,

2:28:26

someone could easily go on that

2:28:28

playground while the children are

2:28:30

playing or the children could easily

2:28:32

drift away from the playground just

2:28:34

because that area right there by the

2:28:37

alley wasn't secure."

2:28:41

Um, so again, I'm just I haven't been

2:28:46

over that way in that alley in a while,

2:28:49

but I do remember thinking that and

2:28:52

wondering if the kids were safe. That's

2:28:54

all. Just from So, will this grant cover

2:28:57

a new wall or a new fence?

2:29:01

>> Yeah. So, the the grant for the grant

2:29:05

application here is to start building

2:29:08

towards a bigger project.

2:29:09

>> We're not going to be able to go get one

2:29:11

grant. We're going to need multiple

2:29:12

grants.

2:29:13

>> Um it's not a project that we anticipate

2:29:15

being done in in um like 24 months or

2:29:19

anything like that. We do expect it to

2:29:20

probably take about three years

2:29:22

>> to get the funding for this project.

2:29:25

>> Yeah. So just because of the traffic

2:29:27

that goes through that alley there and

2:29:29

all the cars that drive through there,

2:29:31

I'd like to see that whole side secured

2:29:35

so no one can go up on in that

2:29:39

playground and the children can't branch

2:29:41

out into the street into the alley while

2:29:44

they're chasing their ball or

2:29:46

>> so that's my only concern with that

2:29:48

playground. But thank you very much for

2:29:50

all that you do and that's it for me,

2:29:52

Councilwoman Ross. Thank you. And there

2:29:56

was one more question.

2:29:57

>> Oh, you do you have

2:29:59

>> It's not a question. It's just kind of a

2:30:00

clarification. Um as far as what

2:30:02

Councilwoman Davis was talking about

2:30:04

>> on the street that is Mayflower Alley,

2:30:06

there are not houses directly across.

2:30:08

It's where it runs right behind um

2:30:10

Hamilton Health Center.

2:30:12

>> So you're not crazy. There is a section

2:30:14

without houses. Um right and there's

2:30:16

like shrubbery there. And then the other

2:30:18

portion does have houses and then it's

2:30:20

the other street.

2:30:22

There is a section with the wall that I

2:30:24

believe is crumbling along Mayflower

2:30:26

Street that doesn't have houses that I

2:30:28

think you were speaking to. Yes, it's

2:30:30

Mayflower Street,

2:30:31

>> right? Thank you.

2:30:32

>> Like part of the park has fencing and

2:30:35

then the other part other part does not.

2:30:37

>> I I thought so. And um again, I'm just

2:30:40

concerned that the kids could just, you

2:30:42

know, be chasing their ball. It run the

2:30:45

ball goes out in the alley. It's just

2:30:46

not secure on the alley. There's a lot

2:30:48

of foot traffic that goes through there

2:30:51

and also cars speeding through there.

2:30:55

So, I was just thinking of safety and

2:30:57

hopefully that this grant could cover a

2:31:00

a wall, a fence or something that could

2:31:03

make sure that the kids are safe within

2:31:06

the playground.

2:31:07

>> So, thank you again for all you that you

2:31:10

do.

2:31:12

>> Thank you. Thank you both. Um, and Vice

2:31:14

President Jones, you had a question.

2:31:17

>> Yeah. Um, I've been meaning to get get

2:31:19

with you guys about this because I keep

2:31:21

getting um inquiries about uh the flat

2:31:24

top of Reservoir Park. Have there been a

2:31:26

study up there? People have been worried

2:31:28

about this thing crumbling down up there

2:31:30

by the Civil War Museum.

2:31:34

>> You have to talk to Joe about that. That

2:31:36

city engineer. Okay. I I did do not to

2:31:39

cut you off anybody off but about not

2:31:42

this budget but the last budget um I had

2:31:45

went out in the summertime with Joel. We

2:31:48

went up to the flat top. We even had a

2:31:50

company come out and I asked them to get

2:31:53

um a quote done to see how much would it

2:31:56

cost because it is tilting. It is

2:31:59

falling. It's scary to stand there and

2:32:00

look down. It's going right behind

2:32:02

McDevit. So I understood the concern.

2:32:06

Um,

2:32:07

I believe they had said that the Civil

2:32:09

War Museum may have had a grant, but

2:32:13

then I even spoke to uh, Solicitor

2:32:15

Grover and um, they didn't know if they

2:32:18

had a grant. It was a whole thing, but

2:32:20

then it was not even put in the budget

2:32:22

as a project because they said it was

2:32:25

said that it's not crumbling yet. So, I

2:32:29

know Councilman Jones left, but whoever

2:32:31

else needed that. So, it's not important

2:32:34

at the moment. So that's that's what I

2:32:37

got on it. So um I don't know.

2:32:42

So any other questions, concerns? Okay.

2:32:46

No, you're welcome. I would um please

2:32:50

add resolution two of 2026

2:32:53

um to our next legislative agenda. And

2:32:56

that's it for Parks, Recreation, and

2:32:59

Enrichment Committee. Thank you both for

2:33:01

coming tonight and giving us

2:33:02

information. Enjoy your evening. Oh,

2:33:05

wait, one more thing. I am so sorry. Can

2:33:07

you please send all of us the slides?

2:33:09

Thank you so much.

2:33:12

>> Thank you. We will move forward with our

2:33:14

meeting agenda. Next, we have public

2:33:17

comment. Just a few housekeeping notes

2:33:19

before we begin. Uh, please state your

2:33:22

name and your address for the meeting

2:33:24

record. If you don't feel comfortable

2:33:26

sharing your address, please share the

2:33:28

vicinity in which you live within the

2:33:30

city. You will have four minutes to

2:33:32

share your comments. Mr. Humphrey has

2:33:35

added a timer to the screen for your

2:33:37

reference. I will begin to my right. Is

2:33:41

there anyone that would like to offer

2:33:42

public comment?

2:33:44

Okay, seeing and hearing no one. Anyone

2:33:46

in the middle section?

2:33:53

>> Good evening, council members. My name

2:33:55

is Ca Rain, resident of Steel Barrow.

2:33:58

Um, as you all know, I was here last

2:34:00

week on the topic of ICE. Um,

2:34:05

today I'm coming again about the

2:34:07

subject, but not of my own view, but

2:34:10

that of my partner's experience in all

2:34:13

of this. I would like to take a moment

2:34:15

to thank Councilwoman Green for bringing

2:34:17

this up when the police department was

2:34:19

here. I do appreciate that. Um, but I do

2:34:22

have a letter from my partner who is

2:34:24

currently at home terrified to even

2:34:27

answer the front door because of what's

2:34:29

going on in the country right now.

2:34:33

So, my name is Aaron Rain. I have not

2:34:36

left my house since January 10th when

2:34:38

ICE first arrived in Harrisburg. I was

2:34:40

born in this country at Franklin Square

2:34:42

Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. That

2:34:44

does not stop people from asking me

2:34:46

where are you from and assuming I'm a

2:34:48

Hispanic immigrant. During the Baltimore

2:34:51

ice raids in 2018, I hid in my house

2:34:53

with other members of the community who

2:34:55

looked like me because an American

2:34:57

citizen named Richard Garza, sorry,

2:34:59

Ricardo Garza, had already been detained

2:35:02

by ICE and had been detained for 38 days

2:35:05

even though he was a legal citizen. It

2:35:07

also does not matter that I am a mixed

2:35:09

race black man, as Germaine Thomas, who

2:35:11

was born on US soil on a United States

2:35:13

military base, was deported to Jamaica

2:35:15

on May 28th of last year.

2:35:18

I fled to this state after the literal

2:35:20

KKK chased me out of West Virginia after

2:35:23

protesting and writing a petition for

2:35:25

police reform during the Black Lives

2:35:27

Matter protests. I came to the city

2:35:29

because Harrisburg is so diverse and

2:35:31

welcoming to all. Now, I'm asking the

2:35:34

city that I've lived in for several

2:35:35

years to keep constituents like me and

2:35:37

others safe from ICE agents who

2:35:39

repeatedly break the law and detain

2:35:40

legal citizens. I would like to go I

2:35:43

would like to leave my house to go

2:35:45

grocery shopping, go to doctor's

2:35:46

appointments, and take my family out for

2:35:48

fun. I cannot do that under the threat

2:35:50

of wrongful detainment. I urge the city

2:35:53

to stop allowing ICE to go into

2:35:54

government buildings without a warrant

2:35:56

signed by a judge. I want local laws

2:35:58

preventing ICE from going into

2:36:00

businesses, hospitals, and places of

2:36:02

worship without a warrant signed by a

2:36:05

judge. I want local police to pledge to

2:36:08

stop working with ICE when they are

2:36:09

under no obligation to. Thank you for

2:36:11

your time and I hope to see you soon.

2:36:14

Following that, I would like to speak

2:36:16

more on recent experiences of American

2:36:20

citizens around the country as things

2:36:21

have been happening.

2:36:23

The terror that ICE has been bringing

2:36:25

doesn't just affect the unlawful or the

2:36:27

undocumented as they've gone into

2:36:29

communities arresting peaceful

2:36:30

protesters who are simply exercising

2:36:32

their first amendment rights. Pulling a

2:36:34

disabled woman from a car is seen on

2:36:36

January 13th in Minneapolis. They've

2:36:39

detained legal citizens like uh I'm

2:36:41

going to butcher this name and I do

2:36:42

apologize. Uh Doulsece Consuelum Diaz

2:36:46

Morales in Maryland, a US citizen who

2:36:48

was held for 25 days unlawfully because

2:36:51

of her name and skin color despite the

2:36:53

evidence presented of her citizenship.

2:36:55

There was also a New York City Council

2:36:57

employee who is as of this moment

2:36:59

unnamed to protect the privacy um that

2:37:01

is in the article as well. um but is in

2:37:04

the United States on a visa to live and

2:37:06

work here through October of 2026

2:37:09

and

2:37:10

was detained and sent to a ICE facility

2:37:14

in New York. The New York City Council

2:37:16

has not been able to get a hold of them

2:37:17

for any information as well.

2:37:20

And as recently as this morning when a

2:37:23

man named Chong Lelay Thao was pulled

2:37:26

out of his home in Minnesota in subzero

2:37:28

temperatures in just his underwear in

2:37:30

front of his daughter-in-law and his

2:37:32

four-year-old grandson and detained by

2:37:34

ICE who refused to see his ID because

2:37:36

they alleged that he matched the

2:37:38

description of two known sex offenders

2:37:40

that they also alleged live there

2:37:41

despite publicly available registries

2:37:43

documenting otherwise. This man was

2:37:45

driven out to the middle of nowhere,

2:37:47

photographed, and then asked for his ID,

2:37:49

which he didn't have because they had

2:37:51

declined seeing it while he they were

2:37:53

detaining him. In this instance, at the

2:37:55

very least, he was released after a few

2:37:57

hours of wrongful custody and drove back

2:37:59

to his home, still in only his underwear

2:38:01

and the blanket.

2:38:03

So, I do know I'm just about over my

2:38:05

time, but I do ask you, honorable city

2:38:07

council members, to pass a resolution to

2:38:09

prevent ICE operations in the area

2:38:11

without a judicial warrant signed by a

2:38:13

judge in businesses, residencies, places

2:38:16

of worship, or medical facilities so the

2:38:18

people of this beautiful city can

2:38:21

breathe just a little easier. Thank you.

2:38:24

And that's my time.

2:38:27

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else in the

2:38:29

middle section that would like to offer

2:38:30

public comment?

2:38:37

Good evening to the council. My name is

2:38:39

Kia Fowler. I am a new homeowner on

2:38:41

North Fifth Street as of Wednesday. So,

2:38:43

I'm very excited to be here. Thank you

2:38:45

very much. Um, I grew up here in York

2:38:47

County. Well, not Dolphin County, but

2:38:49

grew up in York County. Um, I've been

2:38:50

very privileged my whole life. Grew up

2:38:52

middle-ass family. Never had any

2:38:54

concerns. Obviously white, so I've never

2:38:55

actually had to worry about a lot of the

2:38:57

things that um, majority minority people

2:39:00

worry about. I have had the privilege of

2:39:02

being an immigrant. So even though I was

2:39:04

born here in the US, I immigrated to

2:39:06

Australia for a couple of years um and

2:39:08

was there during a lot of t turmoil. So

2:39:10

I am familiar with a lot of the fears

2:39:12

that a lot of immigrants have when it

2:39:13

comes to interacting with not only

2:39:15

hostile civilians but when it comes to

2:39:17

law enforcement as well. Um many many

2:39:19

immigrants are just here whether they're

2:39:21

documented or not are just here trying

2:39:22

to make a better life for themselves. Um

2:39:24

and are so afraid to step even a toe out

2:39:27

of line because the repercussions that

2:39:29

could happen. Uh it's been really

2:39:30

dismaying to see the actions of ICE in

2:39:33

our communities and I think the c thank

2:39:35

the council members uh for their

2:39:36

comments when the police officers were

2:39:38

here about their focus on keeping

2:39:40

Harrisburg residents safe. Um I really

2:39:42

really really want to make sure that if

2:39:44

something like Minneapolis comes to

2:39:45

Harrisburg that the residents documented

2:39:47

or undocumented are all being protected.

2:39:49

I would really urge the council to look

2:39:51

at passing um some kind of law

2:39:53

resolution um just to prevent 287G from

2:39:58

being enforced here in Harrisburg. Um I

2:40:00

would really like to see the focus on

2:40:02

local police protecting citizens and not

2:40:05

cooperating with ICE as much as

2:40:06

possible. Uh we've seen many many

2:40:09

instances of ICE in Minneapolis and

2:40:11

Minnesota at large violating people's

2:40:13

due process rights. Uh various other

2:40:15

constitutional rights. Um, we've seen

2:40:17

citizens being injured. Um, not to

2:40:20

mention that a lot of ICE were so much

2:40:23

when it comes to the Renee Good

2:40:24

situation. Some of these issues with

2:40:26

with ICE creating dangerous situations

2:40:28

in order to do what they want was so

2:40:30

bad. Then 2014, um, that law was passed

2:40:33

telling officers they could not step in

2:40:34

front of cars, in order to be allowed to

2:40:36

use lethal force. Um, we've seen a lot

2:40:38

of ICE officers u just acting with

2:40:41

impunity uh wearing face masks, hiding

2:40:44

and I would hate to see the residents

2:40:47

scared to come out of their own homes.

2:40:48

Um, this city is so amazing because of

2:40:51

its diversity. I am Jewish and so I love

2:40:53

being up here where I can see people of

2:40:56

various ethnicities, faiths, religions,

2:40:58

languages all interacting and bringing

2:41:01

such a vibrancy to this community. and I

2:41:03

just don't want to see any of that

2:41:04

impeded uh by this lawlessness that

2:41:07

keeps happening. I thank you very much

2:41:08

for your time and I would really hope

2:41:10

that you consider preventing the

2:41:12

enforcement of 287g. Thank you.

2:41:17

>> Thank you.

2:41:18

Is there anyone else in the middle

2:41:20

section that would like to offer public

2:41:21

comment? Okay, seeing and hearing no

2:41:23

one, anyone to my left.

2:41:32

Good evening, council prophet chestnut

2:41:35

between 20th and 21st. Um, I understand

2:41:40

this ICE issue, but we have to keep in

2:41:42

mind that the president did say

2:41:44

effective February if we do um become a

2:41:49

sanctuary city that we will lose funds.

2:41:52

So, um, consider that. You don't want to

2:41:56

what they say, bite off your nose to

2:41:59

please your finger, right?

2:42:01

Um, I'm an immigrant. I've been in

2:42:04

America since 1983. That's 40ome years.

2:42:08

I've been in Harrisburg. I left Germany

2:42:11

in 2007. So, I've been in in Harrisburg

2:42:14

since for 19 years. The point is it is

2:42:19

difficult.

2:42:21

But if our residents came into the

2:42:24

country illegally, then that is a crime.

2:42:30

ICE are federal agents.

2:42:33

Their jurisdictions

2:42:35

is federally not by the city. If the

2:42:39

individual have come into the country

2:42:42

via visa, whether it's a F visa, a B

2:42:45

visa, you know, they will have something

2:42:48

called a I94.

2:42:51

This is a entry document.

2:42:54

If they overstayed

2:42:57

their time,

2:42:59

then that is a civil, not a criminal,

2:43:03

and they won't get the same type of

2:43:05

penalties. Now, if you do want to help

2:43:08

your

2:43:11

visitors that are in here without um

2:43:17

justification,

2:43:19

if they have a I94,

2:43:22

then we can try to move them towards

2:43:25

agency that can help them,

2:43:30

you know, to become legal. But to become

2:43:33

a sanctuary city is not a good move.

2:43:36

You're going to lose your fundings.

2:43:38

You're actually acting against your

2:43:40

parent. And your parent being the

2:43:42

federal government is not a good move.

2:43:45

Um, and yes, the Megan the the goods and

2:43:50

and and there's a lot of things going

2:43:51

on, but you know, if you jump in front

2:43:53

of a car, an ICE agent, a armed officer,

2:43:56

and you go, I mean,

2:44:00

that they're they're justified. There

2:44:03

are a lot of things that they're doing

2:44:04

that is very justified. And if you go

2:44:07

ahead and you allow these criminals

2:44:12

to control the city and come and cry and

2:44:16

listen,

2:44:17

if you're a citizen, then you have no

2:44:19

problem. If you're not a citizen, yeah,

2:44:20

you have a problem. But ain't nobody

2:44:23

want nobody in their backyard

2:44:25

unless they're invited. So don't go, you

2:44:29

know, coming here crying.

2:44:32

We're not in the Holocaust. This is not

2:44:34

a slavery movement. Stop using other

2:44:37

terrible things to justify what is going

2:44:40

on right now. And this is just a simple

2:44:44

federal agents trying to conduct their

2:44:46

jobs. Thank you.

2:44:50

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:44:52

left that would like to offer public

2:44:54

comment?

2:45:04

Good evening. My name is Melanie Cook. I

2:45:07

am a resident of the city of Harrisburg

2:45:09

and I have been for most of my life. I

2:45:11

live in the 3000 block of North Third

2:45:13

Street. This wasn't where I was going to

2:45:15

begin, but let me begin by saying that I

2:45:17

do not live in pre-Nelson Mandela, South

2:45:21

Africa, and will not be producing

2:45:23

identification unless it is warranted.

2:45:26

The second point is if we are talking

2:45:28

about if you are not invited here you

2:45:30

should leave most of us in this room

2:45:32

would be gone. I am of silige Cherokee

2:45:35

descent um and I can assure you we would

2:45:37

like North Carolina and the southern

2:45:39

states back. We have to be aware um that

2:45:43

there is a process under which that has

2:45:45

existed in this country for many years.

2:45:48

Not to age myself, but in 1980 I was an

2:45:51

intern at a select congressional

2:45:54

committee on immigration and refugee

2:45:56

policy. The document is out there. I

2:45:58

suggest you try to read it all of you.

2:46:00

Trash bill relief. Um while there was

2:46:03

discussion of the two approximately 292

2:46:06

properties that may have received uh

2:46:08

compensation, well not compensation, uh

2:46:11

a walk to date, um there was no

2:46:14

information as to how much money um has

2:46:17

been written off. Um I as a citizen

2:46:19

would like to know um how much money is

2:46:22

in the pot and how much money has been

2:46:25

excused to date. Uh, with respect to the

2:46:28

project at 1332 North Second Street, I

2:46:31

do want to commend the city council

2:46:34

members, particularly um, Miss Ross RS

2:46:38

uh, for her pointed questions and

2:46:40

looking out for the existing tenants.

2:46:42

When these new projects come in, we want

2:46:44

to applaud them, but there are five

2:46:46

people at least who have been living in

2:46:48

these buildings, no doubt, for many

2:46:50

years. and very easily it could be

2:46:53

flipped in a way that they would be out

2:46:55

and what they are required to pay would

2:46:58

be um increased greatly. I also commend

2:47:01

uh President Hill for her question with

2:47:04

respect to what is making you produce uh

2:47:06

28 affordable units and note that the

2:47:09

response was we have been educated by

2:47:11

others about the feasibility of

2:47:13

affordable units. All of you or most of

2:47:16

you who have been sitting here should be

2:47:18

commended for the work you've done. the

2:47:21

pressing pressing pressing about

2:47:22

affordable housing. It is not going to

2:47:25

happen overnight. They are not going to

2:47:27

do it unless there's something in it for

2:47:29

them. And you are all to be commended

2:47:32

for the work that has been done, the

2:47:34

demonstration that these projects can be

2:47:36

done in this city. They're aesthetically

2:47:38

pleasing and they provide much needed

2:47:41

housing. Um, a point I would like

2:47:44

clarification on is at the end of his

2:47:47

presentation he slipped in that they

2:47:50

will be pursuing tax abatement 100%. The

2:47:54

question that I have is this property is

2:47:57

owned and the units are going to be

2:47:58

rented. So the 100% residential

2:48:02

abatement would apply to whom? to the

2:48:05

property owner who would not be paying

2:48:07

the tax uh because the renters wouldn't

2:48:11

be assessed to tax. And the question I

2:48:14

would have is how much of the rent um

2:48:16

has been factored in for a tax that they

2:48:19

may not pay. Now, it's one thing to say

2:48:21

we're collecting 20,000 8,000 whatever

2:48:24

he said. Um but if they're getting 100%

2:48:27

tax abatement, then presumably they're

2:48:30

not paying anything. Um with respect to

2:48:33

the project at PA Clinic, I as many of

2:48:36

you know have worked in a number of

2:48:38

fields. Um one of which was a

2:48:40

governmental affairs for building and

2:48:42

developing industry. I can say

2:48:45

definitively that the developer for that

2:48:48

project, Pinark Holding, is one of the

2:48:51

most impressive people I have ever seen.

2:48:53

And those of you who know me know I do

2:48:55

not blow smoke. um they have come in and

2:48:59

offered and done things that I have not

2:49:03

seen many developers do. I implore you

2:49:07

to use them as a model for how the city

2:49:11

wants to see these projects develop

2:49:13

going forward because they are showing

2:49:16

you they are including people. They are

2:49:19

genuinely listening to comments that the

2:49:21

public makes and I implore you implore

2:49:23

you to follow up.

2:49:25

>> Thank you, Miss Cook. Yeah.

2:49:28

And again, we need a whole separate

2:49:31

thing on this situation with ICE.

2:49:36

>> Thank you.

2:49:38

Is there anyone else that would like to

2:49:40

offer public comment? I don't want to

2:49:42

miss anyone. Okay. Seeing and hearing no

2:49:44

one, I did want to respond um regarding

2:49:48

the trash bill forgiveness program. So,

2:49:51

Antonio, as I mentioned when we were

2:49:53

talking, um, did share the updates as of

2:49:57

December 11th, 2025.

2:50:00

So, bear with me. Um, he shared a trash

2:50:05

bill forgiveness program tracker. So,

2:50:07

I'll share those numbers, but he noted

2:50:10

then that we have $913,967.97

2:50:18

remaining in the program. The phase

2:50:20

three list of residents includes 575

2:50:24

residents and is currently being

2:50:26

reviewed by the administration to ensure

2:50:28

there are no employees, elected

2:50:31

officials, landlords, and businesses on

2:50:34

the list. Our goal is to mail out

2:50:37

letters with applications to the

2:50:38

qualified residents by December 19th,

2:50:42

2025.

2:50:43

There will be a timeline stated in the

2:50:46

letter of 15 days of for applications to

2:50:49

be returned. However, due to the

2:50:51

holidays, he anticipated um the ongoing

2:50:55

of a minimum of 15 business days. Um he

2:51:00

noted that they are going to communicate

2:51:02

the exact date and the date that they're

2:51:05

mailed um to council and that would

2:51:08

begin the phase three. So he's going to

2:51:11

provide another update of this tracker

2:51:13

when phase three is complete. So we have

2:51:20

a program overview

2:51:22

and the phase one total forgiven was

2:51:25

$835,37530.

2:51:31

Phase two total forgiven was

2:51:34

$250,656.73.

2:51:42

For a phase 2 overview, the total number

2:51:45

of churches that received of this

2:51:48

forgiveness were 20. Um total accounts

2:51:53

26 total contacted 16%

2:51:58

contacted 80%.

2:52:01

Total attended 9156%

2:52:05

attended 91530%.

2:52:09

Amount forgiven again that was

2:52:11

$250,656.73.

2:52:17

The total potential forgiveness is

2:52:20

$265,126.81

2:52:25

for a percentage forgiven of 94 uh.54%.

2:52:33

For a phase 1 overview, there were 536

2:52:39

um total mailings. Uh the total received

2:52:43

was 268.

2:52:45

So the percent received was 50%. The

2:52:49

total forgiven 835,37530.

2:52:58

The total potential forgiveness

2:53:00

1,531,53689

2:53:08

percent forgiven 54.54%.

2:53:14

The largest forgiven was $8,534.

2:53:21

The smallest forgiven was $77125.

2:53:27

The largest possible forgiveness

2:53:30

uh is $9,5365

2:53:36

and the smallest possible is $3557.

2:53:42

The number that were not returned uh was

2:53:46

211.

2:53:47

The number of bad returns was 57. The

2:53:51

number of landlords 21.

2:53:54

And the number of demoed were four. So

2:53:58

I'll repeat all of these numbers again

2:54:02

um during our legislative session. That

2:54:04

way they are included uh with the

2:54:06

meeting record. And perhaps Antonio, am

2:54:10

I permitted? Are we permitted to share

2:54:11

this? So as I review it, everyone can

2:54:14

view it.

2:54:16

>> Okay.

2:54:20

>> Oh, okay. Didn't have that one, but the

2:54:23

as of December 11th. So we have another

2:54:26

update um as of January 9th. So I will

2:54:28

share that next week, but I did want to

2:54:30

note that you pre previously provided

2:54:32

that. So thank you.

2:54:34

>> If there's no further discussion, any

2:54:37

>> Yes, Councilwoman.

2:54:39

>> Thank you. I was going to ask if that

2:54:41

information could be put on the website.

2:54:44

>> Not sure.

2:54:45

>> I'm not sure. I know that we can share

2:54:47

it during our meeting.

2:54:49

>> We can place it on e-codes.

2:54:50

>> So, okay.

2:54:51

>> Under miscellaneous documents, so it can

2:54:53

be viewed there.

2:54:54

>> Great. Then everyone will have access to

2:54:55

it, but we will review it again. So,

2:54:57

thank you.

2:54:58

>> Thank you.

2:54:58

>> Um, the time is 8:37 p.m. I will

2:55:02

entertain a motion to adjurnn.

2:55:04

>> Is there a second?

2:55:05

>> Second.

2:55:06

>> Thank you. We stand adjourned.

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.