Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Meeting - 06/16/2025

1:31:49755 summary words · ~4 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Board approved three applications, including a dimensional variance for a prominent downtown digital sign, a special exception for a new non-alcoholic event space near Cameron Street, and a use variance and parking exception to convert a long-vacant building into a neighborhood convenience store.

This meeting highlights how municipal zoning relief is used to resolve long-standing commercial vacancies, support neighborhood business needs, and update downtown visual infrastructure while managing community impact and public safety.

Section summaries

0:00-4:36

Intro, Procedural Ground Rules, and Continuance

skip

Summarizes the initial call to order and the administrative postponement of Case 2603 regarding 1951 Hurst Street to the July 21, 2025 zoning hearing board meeting.

This section is purely administrative and contains no policy or zoning debate.

4:36-9:12

Introduction of Case 2602 (213 Market Street)

optional

Covers the swearing-in of representatives from McNees Wallace & Nurick, Strickler Signs, and the Downtown Improvement District, followed by the submission of official board exhibits into the record.

Standard administrative housekeeping and witness introductions.

9:12-13:48

Planning Bureau Overview of Signage Variance

watch

Planning Director Jeffrey Knight presents the rationale for a 175 sq ft electronic sign, highlighting traffic safety, physical street congestion (like a nearby clock tower and street furniture), and the condition of limiting transitions to six per minute.

Explains the architectural and traffic safety justifications behind granting a significant dimensional variance.

13:48-20:42

Applicant Testimony for 213 Market Street

watch

Representatives describe the technical details of the LED sign, arguing that the larger sign is safer and more legible for drivers navigating the congested Second and Market Streets intersection.

Highlights the engineering and safety evaluations used to support the variance.

20:42-29:54

Board Discussion and Vote on 213 Market Street

watch

The board asks about maintenance agreements and historical context, leading to a motion and unanimous vote to approve the signage variance subject to Planning Commission conditions.

Documents the final decision and specific regulatory constraints imposed on the sign's operation.

29:54-34:30

Case 2604 (1025 Market Street) Overview

watch

Swears in representatives for Bella's Events and outlines the proposed event space. Planning Director Jeffrey Knight explains the 'use not specifically prohibited' designation and why restrictive curfews and alcohol bans are standard practice.

Details the administrative strategy used to prevent event spaces from becoming disruptive nightclubs.

34:30-41:24

Parking and Operational Details for Bella's Events

watch

Knight details the physical environment of 1025 Market Street (located in the AE flood plane) and parking concerns, followed by applicant Miss Salace's testimony regarding her 10-year experience in event planning and target markets.

Explains the real-world operational challenges, including flood plane compliance and parking constraints.

41:24-55:12

Security, Capacity, and Approval of 1025 Market Street

optional

Discusses the 90-person maximum capacity, security measures for minors, and community support from St. Francis of Assisi, culminating in the Board approving the special exception.

Contains secondary operational details and the final voting outcome.

55:12-1:06:42

Case 2605 (1415 Sycamore Street) Convenience Store Introduction

watch

Covers the request for a use variance and off-street parking exception for a convenience store in a residential zone. Planning Director Knight notes the building's decades-long commercial history and vacancy hardship.

Offers key insights into adaptive reuse and proving 'hardship' for historic commercial structures in residential districts.

1:06:42-1:29:42

Sycamore Street Neighborhood Impacts and Final Votes

watch

The applicants address concerns regarding neighborhood security, convenience store trash management, and building entry points, followed by a recess and the Board's unanimous approval of the store.

Covers community policing, neighborhood beautification (trash control), and the final legislative resolution.

Key points

  • Signage Legibility vs. Aesthetic Restrictions — The board approved a variance for a 175-square-foot electronic wall sign at 213 Market Street, more than double the permitted 75-square-foot limit, to overcome visibility issues caused by local visual clutter such as traffic lights and a clock tower.
  • Preventing De Facto Nightclubs via Special Exception Conditions — To approve the event space at 1025 Market Street, the Planning Bureau and Board imposed strict conditions including a midnight curfew and a complete ban on alcohol to prevent it from operating as a nightclub.
  • Repurposing Historic Vacancies in Residential Zones — The Board granted a variance and parking exception to open a convenience store in an RM (Residential Medium) zone at 1415 Sycamore Street, noting that the building's physical structure, historical commercial use, and 20-year vacancy constituted a hardship.
in the plane beer's experience many times applicants may try and establish an event space which ends up being a de facto Bob club or again a nightclub or dance hall. Jeffrey Knight
the downtown improvement district, we're the clean, safe, and beautiful for downtown. That's our mission. Uh we also want to attract and inform people of events that go on Todd Vanderweed

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

3:48

601. Um

3:51

and um just going to give a couple

3:53

ground rules um this evening. Uh the we

3:57

have uh four scheduled hearings. One of

4:00

them is going to be continued. Um so we

4:04

have a stenographer. Um and when the

4:07

stenographer is here to take a record of

4:10

the proceedings this evening. So it's

4:13

important that um when um somebody is

4:17

speaking somebody doesn't speak over

4:18

them. We want to make sure that we have

4:20

a complete record in case there's an

4:22

appeal. Um the first case we're going to

4:26

call we're going to uh call one case out

4:30

of order. Uh case number 2603.

4:34

It's relative to the property located at

4:36

1951 Hurst Street.

4:39

Um

4:41

we'll open this uh hearing. um and just

4:44

put in the record that um that we

4:47

received uh what I'm going to mark as

4:50

exhibit B1, which is an email from the

4:52

representative of the applicant uh

4:56

requesting a continuence uh to the July

5:01

21st uh 2025 zoning hearing board

5:05

meeting. Um, so we just wanted to, uh,

5:08

announce that on the record so we don't

5:10

have to readvertise again, uh, for next

5:13

month. Um so um with that we could um

5:18

we'll close that hearing

5:22

and uh we'll move on to

5:25

uh the item that was number one on the

5:28

agenda uh item number 2602 which is the

5:32

variance application for 213

5:36

Market Street Harrisburg Pennsylvania.

5:40

We're going to identify and swear in

5:41

some witnesses and then I'm going to

5:43

mark some board exhibits. Um so um Mr.

5:48

Knight U who is the uh codes

5:52

administrator zoning officer, could you

5:54

please identify yourself for the record?

5:57

Uh Jeffrey Knight, planning director for

5:58

the city of Harrisburg. Okay. And do you

6:01

swear or affirm that the testimony

6:03

you're about to give to this board is

6:04

the truth and nothing but the truth? I

6:06

do. Okay.

6:08

And um

6:10

um Steve um do you want to um introduce

6:15

yourself and uh who you're going to have

6:19

as uh witnesses to testify this evening?

6:22

Absolutely. I'm Steve Albert from Mcnes

6:24

Wallace and Nurk. Uh we represent the

6:26

downtown improvement district for the

6:28

city of Harrisburg. Um, with me tonight

6:30

is Kevin Coots from Strickler Signs, uh,

6:33

who will be able to explain a little bit

6:34

more about the project itself, and then

6:36

Todd Vanderweed, who is, um, with the

6:38

Downtown Improvement District as well,

6:40

going to be my witnesses.

6:43

Um, Mr. uh, Kun, could you, um, spell

6:47

your last name for the record? C O T.

6:53

And Mr. Vanderweed. Yeah, it's Vander

6:56

Woody. It's T. last name is two words v

7:07

Mr. Vander Woody and um Mr. Kun, could

7:10

you please uh raise your right hand? Do

7:13

you swear or affirm that the testimony

7:15

you're about to give before this board

7:16

is truth and nothing but the truth? I

7:19

do. Okay. So, I'm going to mark uh a few

7:22

exhibits that we've uh received uh from

7:31

I'm going to mark these as board

7:33

exhibits. Uh uh exhibit B1, board

7:35

exhibit number one is proof of

7:37

publication. The time and place and

7:40

particular nature of this matter was

7:42

advertised in the Patriot News, which is

7:44

a newspaper of general circulation for

7:47

the city of Harrisburg.

7:49

uh and that appeared uh on June 1st and

7:52

June 8th, 2025.

7:55

Exhibit B2 is a letter dated June 12th,

7:58

2025 from the planning director, Jeffrey

8:01

Knight, to the applicant uh notifying

8:03

the applicant of the time and place of

8:06

the uh hearing. Uh board exhibit number

8:09

three is the hearing not notice which

8:11

was posted upon the property in question

8:14

that occurred on March 26, 2025.

8:18

Board exhibit number four is the

8:20

application's not applicants

8:22

notification letters and to the required

8:24

neighbors. Exhibit B5 is the application

8:28

packet including the narrative,

8:31

photographs and plans for the proposal.

8:35

Board exhibit number six is the deed to

8:38

the property to establish uh standing uh

8:42

as well as B7 which is an agreement

8:44

establishing applicant standing to

8:46

pursue zoning relief. Uh board exhibit

8:49

number eight is the bureau case report

8:53

and board exhibit number nine is the

8:55

city of Harrisburg planning commission

8:58

resolution. And I also want to add that

9:00

from the city solicitor's office, we

9:03

have this evening Jonathan Luff.

9:07

And with that being the case, uh Mr.

9:09

Knight, did did you want to give an

9:11

overview of this matter? And then we'll

9:13

have the applicant present their case.

9:15

Uh sure. Uh so the um application for

9:18

2602 uh for case number 2602 uh involves

9:22

the replacement of an existing uh

9:24

internally illuminated LED sign uh on

9:27

the western uh facade of the uh property

9:30

at 213 uh Market Street with a sign

9:34

that's uh larger than permitted by right

9:37

uh per the zoning code. Um the allowance

9:39

in the zoning code uh for the downtown

9:41

center district in which the property is

9:43

located is 75 square feet. Uh and the

9:46

applicant is proposing uh a sign of 175

9:49

square feet. Uh because there's already

9:52

electronically changing messaging um in

9:54

the existing sign, uh that

9:56

non-conforming aspect of the uh property

9:59

and of the proposed sign uh can be

10:01

continued uh moving forward. Um, in this

10:04

case, the um conditions that establish

10:08

uh the hardship uh that would grant the

10:10

variance uh involve uh the building's

10:12

location at a fairly highly trafficked

10:16

um intersection where uh e quick and

10:19

easy um uh observing and uh reading of

10:23

signage is critical for uh the safety of

10:26

all users, pedestrians, bicyclists,

10:28

transit uh and drivers. Um,

10:32

additionally, the um specific location

10:35

around the sign, especially if you're

10:36

coming uh eastbound on Market Street, uh

10:38

is pretty visually congested area. You

10:41

have uh both the traffic signals um and

10:45

uh other light poles and um street

10:47

furniture uh around the intersection.

10:49

And then there's also a large clock

10:51

tower that's kind of right in front of

10:52

where the sign is as you're looking uh

10:55

directly at it. Um and so uh you know

10:58

all of these conditions obviously impact

11:01

the uh legibility and visibility of the

11:03

proposed sign. Um and so uh the

11:06

applicants are requesting a sign about

11:08

twice as large uh as the current one uh

11:10

that is there on site. um in order to um

11:14

mitigate these conditions around the

11:16

property. Uh the applicants have also

11:18

noted that uh for the most part uh the

11:20

messaging is going to be limited to um

11:25

that for public announcements and public

11:26

events as well as for the nonprofits. Um

11:29

there will be um uh advertising of the

11:32

uh bank uh building on which uh the uh

11:36

signage sits, but otherwise that's the

11:38

only um advertising for uh uh the

11:41

private sector uh that would occur um

11:43

via the signage messaging. Uh so uh for

11:47

all of those reasons, the planning

11:49

commission has recommended that the

11:51

zoning hearing board approved the

11:52

request for the following with the

11:54

following condition. Uh because the

11:56

applicant is predicating their request

11:57

on driver legibility and safety, the

11:59

planning bureau recommends the signage

12:01

limit message transitions to limit

12:04

message transitions to six transitions

12:06

per minute for pend guidance for

12:08

billboards and previous approvals for

12:09

similar proposals granted by the zoning

12:11

hearing board. Uh and um just to

12:13

clarify, those are largely for uh

12:15

billboards. Uh but of course um you know

12:18

we would imagine that the uh conditions

12:21

would be you know largely similar uh

12:23

more visibility on a highway but uh also

12:25

faster moving traffic. So kind of the

12:27

slower moving traffic but the more

12:29

visual obstructions kind of offset each

12:30

other there in that case. Uh the

12:33

planning commission is recommending uh

12:34

the zoning hearing board approve the

12:36

request for the following reasons.

12:37

proposed signage will better promote

12:39

publicly accessible activities and

12:40

events held by government agencies and

12:42

local nonprofits and will not be used to

12:44

advertise private businesses other than

12:46

that of the property owner and thus

12:47

there's a significant public benefit

12:49

component to the proposal. Uh given the

12:51

context of the signage location on a

12:53

large building facade at a major

12:54

intersection in a visually congested

12:56

area, the current sign is somewhat

12:58

unnoticeable or illeible and thus there

13:00

is justification for allowing larger

13:01

signage more conspicuous to drivers and

13:03

pedestrians.

13:06

Okay, thank you. Does uh anybody from

13:09

the board have any questions of Mr.

13:10

Knight at this point?

13:15

Okay. Um

13:20

Mr. Albrand, um we just heard the um Mr.

13:25

tonight um indicate that the planning

13:28

commission uh recommended uh a condition

13:32

of um

13:34

to limit the message transitions to six

13:37

transitions per minute. Is that

13:39

something that your client is agreeable

13:41

to? Yeah, correct. As it stands now, I

13:44

mean, it's every 20 to 30 seconds at

13:46

this point, so that won't be a problem.

13:47

Okay. We don't plan on changing it

13:49

anyway. Okay. Go ahead. You could

13:51

proceed with your case then. Thank you.

13:53

Well, Jeff did a great job of giving

13:54

some background. Uh, I kind of stole my

13:56

thunder with all all the facts he gave

13:58

and how thorough he is, so I appreciate

14:00

that. Um, but, um, a couple things. Um,

14:04

basically just reiterating what he said.

14:05

The downtown improvement district is a

14:07

place, um, where, you know, the

14:08

community thrives. People can get

14:10

involved. We want to encourage

14:11

participation. We want to encourage

14:12

people getting out and getting involved

14:13

in the community. Um, and we also want

14:15

them to be able to do that safely. Uh, I

14:17

don't know if you guys noticed the sign

14:18

when you drove in today to this meeting.

14:20

Um, but it I didn't notice it because,

14:23

you know, it's not that visible. It's

14:25

very hard to see. There's a lot of

14:26

obstructions. Um, it's very outdated.

14:28

And we're just looking to change that

14:29

and bring it up to speed with the with

14:31

the community and the everchanging urban

14:32

landscape. So, electronic electronically

14:35

changing wall signs are permitted by

14:37

Wright in the um in the DC district uh

14:40

pursuant to section 7325.11

14:43

um which regulate the illumination of

14:45

signs within the city. The proposed sign

14:48

um was designed to comply with section 7

14:50

325.11 of the zoning ordinance and will

14:52

be more aesthetically pleasing and safer

14:54

for passing vehicles kind of as Jeff

14:56

said um to read as they pass through the

14:58

second and market streets downtown. Um I

15:00

know when I'm sitting at that stoplight

15:02

it's hard to see that sign. And

15:04

basically what we're doing is we're

15:05

taking um the existing condition and

15:07

we're just bringing it up from window to

15:08

window. If you ever look at that

15:10

building there's windows on top, there's

15:11

a bit of a a gap in the middle and then

15:13

there's windows on the bottom. And we're

15:15

just trying to fill that gap to give as

15:16

much area as we can so people can

15:18

clearly see the sign and clearly see

15:20

what's advertised without having to, you

15:21

know, worry about bicyclists or people

15:24

walking in front of them while they're

15:25

trying to read the sign. It's very

15:26

apparent. It's very clear. Um the

15:28

proposed sign is approximately 175

15:30

square feet. The sign as it exists today

15:32

is 88 square feet, which is also

15:35

non-conforming pursuant to the ordinance

15:37

which has a limit of 75 square feet. Um

15:40

section 7325 attachment one uh

15:43

subsection 3 of the zoning ordinance

15:45

limits the sign area of a wall sign to

15:47

only only 75 ft. Uh the existing sign

15:49

has exceeded that square footage

15:51

requirement since at least about 2008.

15:53

That's where we have, you know, our last

15:54

record of of them ever changing that

15:57

sign. Um the downtown improvement

15:59

district is seeking a dimensional

16:00

variance um from section 3 3- or 7-325

16:03

of the zoning ordinance to permit its

16:05

approximately 175 square foot

16:07

electronically changing message wall

16:09

sign. Accordingly, we're here tonight to

16:11

request the zoning hearing board

16:12

consider the recommended approval from

16:13

the planning commission uh and grant the

16:15

approval of the downtown improvement

16:17

district's variance to um allow a 175

16:20

foot uh square foot electronically

16:22

changing message wall sign in the DC

16:24

district. Um, at this time I will have

16:26

Kevin CS from Strickler Science come up

16:28

and provide some comments on the sign,

16:30

its design and aesthetics, um, vehicle

16:32

and pedestrian safety, and the sign's

16:33

technical specifications and compliance

16:35

with the building.

16:38

All right. So, Kevin, um, who do you

16:40

work for? Strickler. And what is your

16:43

role with Strickler Signs?

16:48

How long have you been in that role?

16:50

2015 took ownership for seven

16:54

Have you done work with the downtown

16:56

improvement district before?

17:02

And in your opinion, how important is

17:04

sign visibility at this particular

17:05

location where the sign's located?

17:16

Uh, thank you. I forgot to mention I did

17:18

bring some easier to read exhibits. Do

17:20

you guys want those? Sure. just because

17:21

I'm going to reference them with Kevin

17:23

here. They're in the uh application

17:26

packet, but they're towards the back and

17:27

kind of

17:51

We get one more of those. Yeah.

17:55

Thank you. All right.

18:00

I have one. Yeah.

18:05

Oh, sorry about that. Sure. All right.

18:07

So, before you is exhibit A. What is it?

18:15

And can you please orient the the board

18:17

uh to the property as it's situated in

18:18

this picture? It's on the

18:22

west facade.

18:28

And is this property in a busy stretch

18:30

of the DC district?

18:33

Do a lot of vehicles and pedestrians see

18:34

the existing sign from its current

18:36

location? And now before you is exhibit

18:38

B. So you guys want to flip to the next

18:40

couple pages here?

18:45

What is this?

18:53

Dimensions of the currency

18:55

and please use it to describe the

18:56

existing sign. Well, existing sign is

18:59

4T4 by 204.

19:18

All right. And if you would turn to

19:19

exhibit C, which is the next page, um,

19:22

can you explain what this is?

19:25

That is an image of

19:28

the upper right corner.

19:33

It is 7 foot, which is 7 foot.

19:40

10 million.

19:43

Most of the dots already.

19:46

All right.

19:48

And uh will the proposed sign comply

19:50

with all of the requirements of section

19:52

7-325.11

19:54

regarding the illumination of signs

19:56

within the city? Yes. And why is it

19:58

important for that sign particularly to

20:00

be 175 square feet?

20:03

Um the current signage it serve purpose

20:07

certainly needs greater clarity.

20:12

And is the proposed sign safer for

20:14

motorists to read? Why is that? Um, you

20:18

can have uh gater images

20:28

and is the proposed sign safer for

20:29

pedestrians in the city? Okay. Is the

20:32

proposed sign designed to provide

20:34

adequate time and travel distance for

20:36

motorists to safely detect, read, and

20:38

understand the proposed sign and its

20:39

contents?

20:41

And will the proposed sign uh alter the

20:43

essential character of the neighborhood

20:45

or the DC district?

20:47

Can you explain why? It's it's the same

20:50

technology.

20:53

And does the proposed sign alter the

20:55

development of any adjacent property?

20:58

Is it detrimental to the public welfare?

21:00

And in your opinion, is the minimum

21:02

variance necessary to afford relief to

21:04

the applicant? Yes. All right, that's

21:07

all my questions I have for Kevin. Do

21:09

you guys have any questions for

21:13

anybody? I ask one question

21:17

in

21:20

cont.

21:25

That's going to be a question for Todd.

21:28

Is that okay? You want to ask it now?

21:31

Yeah. The the downtown improvement

21:33

district is responsible for putting the

21:35

messages up on the board up on the sign

21:38

board.

21:44

And

21:46

who maintain? I'm just looking at some

21:49

of the specs

21:52

of what you can replace, what's there,

21:55

what's being replaced. Who's going to

21:56

handle the maintenance of it? month

21:59

maintenance, annual maintenance,

22:00

snowstorm kicks in, causes some

22:02

problems. Who handles that? That'll be

22:05

with Strickler. Um, as as before, and

22:08

I'll get a little bit into the history

22:10

of the existing sign if you'd like. Um,

22:13

so the the existing sign was put up in

22:16

2008.

22:18

Um, had had a 10y year or so life. And

22:22

as we were talking, you know, as Kevin

22:24

mentioned, it it ran its course. So, it

22:26

worked for 17 years, so it no longer

22:29

works anymore. So, when we did have a

22:31

panel go out or something go wrong with

22:34

it, so to speak, um, we just called

22:37

Strickler and they came and and within

22:40

very reasonable amount of time to fix

22:42

that sign. So, we'll have that same type

22:44

of agreement again as we move forward

22:46

with the new board.

22:49

And since this is on the MT building,

22:52

you've got necessary

22:57

to post this building. Correct. Yeah,

23:00

they already have two stationary wall

23:02

signs near the top if you ever seen

23:03

those coming across the bridge. Um, but

23:06

this will also advertise their bank as

23:08

well for the ground level people on on a

23:10

rotating basis. So, that would be

23:11

intermixed with all the other

23:12

announcements.

23:21

Actually, good evening. Um, I do have

23:23

one question tonight. Uh so I know we've

23:25

had a number of other applications um

23:28

related to sign variances. Um I think

23:31

some from the school district and there

23:33

was I think one or two other ones that I

23:34

can remember. But um in terms of this

23:36

application, do you see any factors that

23:39

are you know vastly different from those

23:41

applications? Um, I would say the ex the

23:45

surrounding urban environment is um more

23:48

chaotic uh and active than in a lot of

23:51

the uh other schools uh signage

23:53

locations. Um and some of the other ones

23:56

I think have been like churches and

23:57

stuff. Those tend to be in uh more

23:59

residential areas um and uh thus have

24:04

like less street furniture around,

24:05

signage, light poles, stuff like that.

24:07

Um, so I would say that's the main

24:10

difference between those types of

24:11

environments.

24:13

Thank you.

24:17

Um, Mr. Loft, do you have any questions

24:18

of, uh, Mr. Kudz?

24:22

Okay.

24:24

Then I'll proceed with Todd. So, um,

24:26

Todd, I'm going to ask you a series of

24:27

questions. So, who do you work for? I am

24:29

the executive director for the

24:30

Harrisburg Downtown Improvement

24:32

District. And how long have you been in

24:33

that role? Uh, I started in that role in

24:36

2008, so 17 plus years. And you've kind

24:39

of already alluded to this, but I'll say

24:41

it anyway. Uh, can you please tell the

24:42

board a little bit about the existing

24:44

sign and why the downtown improvement

24:45

district is replacing it at this time?

24:47

Yes. Um, unfortunately, the the sign

24:50

broke down. It was no longer fixable.

24:52

Uh, the parts uh just couldn't work

24:54

anymore. Strickler put a ton of

24:55

band-aids on there for us, and I

24:57

appreciate that. Um, but it it ran its

25:00

life, so we we need to replace that

25:02

board. Um, So, the downtown improvement

25:05

district, we're the clean, safe, and

25:06

beautiful for downtown. That's our

25:08

mission. Uh we also want to attract and

25:11

inform people of events that go on

25:14

downtown. And that's really what and the

25:16

surrounding area. That's really what we

25:18

use this board for is to really attract

25:22

and inform people of events, city

25:24

events, county events. Um you know,

25:26

Artsfest, which was a couple weeks ago,

25:29

uh we would have put up there July 4th

25:31

food trucks. uh the parades that we do,

25:35

um Capona's coming up, all that kind of

25:38

stuff. We we feature those on there. Uh

25:41

we also look at the nonprofits, you

25:43

know, the art association, um Open

25:46

Stage, uh the events at the forum and

25:49

that kind of stuff. So, that's that's

25:51

really what we try to do is really

25:53

attract and inform people of what's

25:55

going on in the Harrisburg area. All

25:58

right. So, you just said, you know, what

25:59

happens with the with the existing sign?

26:01

Are you guys going to on using the new

26:04

sign in the same manner as the existing

26:05

sign? Yes. Yes. And will the proposed

26:08

sign be used to advertise, identify, or

26:10

direct to the public um any businesses

26:13

other than Mnt Bank in exchange for

26:14

compensation? No, we we're not going to

26:17

sell any advertising on that board. Yep.

26:19

Okay. So, how will this sign improve the

26:21

DC district and the downtown area? Well,

26:24

I I think it it what it will do is it

26:26

will give us a a nice vehicle um to

26:30

really

26:31

do what I already mentioned. Now, we we

26:33

have social media and we have a

26:35

newsletter. We have that kind of stuff

26:36

to inform people of what what's

26:38

happening. But I think something this

26:40

visible uh in a visible part of the

26:43

city, Market Square, uh right there in

26:45

that building really does help uh with

26:48

with us and and really the city's

26:50

programs here. So, in your opinion, the

26:52

sign will provide a community benefit.

26:54

Yes. And did you review the application

26:57

that was submitted in support of this

26:58

variance request? Yes, I did. And to the

27:01

extent applicable, do you adopt the

27:02

comments made therein as um part of the

27:04

downtown improvement district zone? Yes.

27:07

All right. That is all I have for Todd.

27:08

If you guys have any questions

27:11

purpose. Okay. Does the board have any

27:13

questions of uh Mr. Vander? No. Um

27:19

Mr. Loft, do you have any questions of

27:22

Okay. Um, is there anybody uh any

27:25

citizen here that uh wants to make a

27:28

comment with regards to this application

27:33

hearing? None. Um,

27:37

you're completed with your Yeah, I just

27:39

would say for all the reasons that we

27:40

articulated this evening as well as

27:42

what's contained in the zoning hearing

27:43

board application, uh, we would request

27:45

that the zoning hearing board approve

27:46

this variance request to permit this

27:48

proposed sign as designed in the DC

27:50

district.

27:57

I'll make a motion to accept the approve

28:02

to approve the recommendation

28:05

for the

28:09

signific

28:16

indicated by the

28:19

planning director

28:21

and the planning hearing board.

28:25

Okay. So that that would be uh your

28:28

motion is to approve the variance uh

28:31

request conditioned upon um the uh

28:35

conditions set forth by the planning

28:38

commission. Um that let me get it here

28:43

that the applicant will limit uh message

28:45

transition to six transitions per minute

28:48

per pendot guidance for billboards and

28:52

previous approvals for similar proposals

28:54

granted by the zoning hearing board.

28:58

Second.

28:59

Moved and seconded. Any discussion?

29:02

All those in favor signify by saying I.

29:05

I. Okay. You'll receive a written

29:08

decision within 45 days of today's

29:11

hearing. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank

29:13

you very much. Appreciate it.

29:20

No thanks.

29:39

Okay. Next on the agenda is um item

29:44

number 2604.

29:47

Uh this is a um

29:53

this is a special exception request

29:56

uh by Bella's Events.

29:59

Uh and uh it's with regards to the

30:02

property located at 1025 Market Street,

30:06

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, which is

30:08

located in the downtown town center uh

30:12

district. Um Mr. Knight, you were uh

30:16

previously sworn in at the last hearing.

30:19

Do you agree that you uh you are still

30:21

sworn in and we'll tell the truth to the

30:23

board? I do. Okay. Um the applicant, do

30:26

you want to introduce yourselves, spell

30:28

your last names for the record, please?

30:31

Yeah. My name is Dale Hair H I R with

30:35

Katie Free Design Studio and I assisted

30:38

the owner and the petrol tenant.

30:44

Okay.

30:56

Okay. Um Mr. Mr. Harum, Miss Salace, uh,

31:00

could you please raise your right hand?

31:02

Do you swear or affirm that the

31:03

testimony you're about to give before

31:05

this board is the truth and nothing but

31:06

the truth? I do. Okay. And we'll know

31:10

for the record uh from the solicitor's

31:12

office, we have Jonathan Luff here

31:13

present.

31:15

Um, I'm going to mark uh some uh

31:19

exhibits that uh we've uh received, the

31:22

zoning hearing board has uh received

31:26

and has in their file.

31:28

Um, I'm going to mark as board exhibit

31:30

number one, proof of publication. Uh,

31:33

the time and place and particular nature

31:35

of this matter was advertised in the

31:37

Patriot News. Uh, the ad uh the ad

31:40

appeared on the June in a June 1st and

31:43

June 8th uh, publication of the Patriot

31:46

News. Board exhibit number two is a

31:48

letter dated June 12th, 2025

31:52

uh from the planning director, Jeffrey

31:55

Knight, to the applicant notifying the

31:57

applicant of the time and place of this

31:59

hearing. Board exhibit number three is

32:01

the hearing notice uh posting on the

32:04

property in question which occurred on

32:05

May 30th, 2025.

32:08

Board exhibit number four is the

32:09

applicant's notification letters to the

32:12

required neighbors. Board exhibit number

32:14

five is the application packet including

32:17

the narrative,

32:18

photos of existing conditions

32:21

and business plan uh as a part of uh

32:25

this proposal. Board exhibit number six

32:28

is the deed to the property. Board

32:30

exhibit number seven is a commercial

32:32

lease agreement establishing the

32:34

applicant standing to pursue zoning

32:36

relief in this matter. Board exhibit

32:39

number eight is the planning bureau's

32:40

case report and board exhibit number

32:42

nine is the city of Harrisburg planning

32:45

commission resolution. So we have board

32:49

exhibits 1 through nine and then with

32:51

that uh Mr. Knight could you uh please

32:54

give us a summary if you would. Sure. Uh

32:58

so uh case number 2604 uh involves uh

33:02

the uh establishment of an event space

33:05

use uh on the subject property at 1025

33:08

uh Market Street. Um and as the board um

33:12

uh recalls uh in the past when they've

33:15

reviewed these, these have been um filed

33:17

under a use not specifically prohibited

33:19

in the zoning code uh per section

33:21

7-303.11

33:23

uh B of the uh zoning code. Um and uh

33:27

for the most part, you know, these are

33:30

similar type uses to maybe a bar or um

33:33

even like a nightclub or dance hall, but

33:35

they uh definitely have kind of

33:37

different intensity uh of operations,

33:40

different activities on site. Um and um

33:45

when uh fielding inquiries about these

33:47

uh types of uh uses, uh we often refer

33:52

back to um a uh a an application that

33:58

was reviewed several years ago by the

33:59

zoning hearing board uh at 2307 Berry

34:02

Hill Street. Um and in that case uh the

34:05

applicant um agreed to both uh

34:07

prohibition on alcohol uh on site um and

34:11

um capping their hours at uh 108 10 p.m.

34:15

in that case. Uh and the reason these

34:18

types of uh conditions are necessary is

34:20

because uh in the plane beer's

34:22

experience uh many times uh applicants

34:25

may try and establish an event space

34:27

which ends up being a de facto Bob club

34:30

or again a nightclub or dance hall. Um

34:33

and when these um kind of fall uh when

34:36

these kind of try and use loopholes in

34:38

the zoning code um to establish

34:41

something like that uh we often end up

34:43

having um adverse impacts down the road.

34:46

Um and so for you know about the last 5

34:50

years or so the um event space use as

34:53

it's become more popular in the city has

34:55

been filed um and submitted to the

34:57

zoning hearing board for their review

34:58

under the use not specifically

34:59

prohibited. In this case, uh we note

35:02

that the uh property is um in a fairly

35:05

congested area. It's um while it's in

35:07

the downtown center, it's right on the

35:09

eastern edge of that zoning designation

35:11

um along a at a fairly highly trafficked

35:14

intersection of Cameron Street and

35:16

Market Street. Um the building itself uh

35:20

has a commercial or industrial history.

35:22

I think the most recent um the most

35:25

recent informal use was a a motorcycle

35:28

membership club, I believe. Um and uh

35:31

prior to that, the last recognized use

35:33

was, I believe, a furniture store. Um

35:35

and uh there aren't really any um

35:38

housing units within probably, you know,

35:41

even a quarter mile of of this property

35:44

uh or several at least 1,000 ft. Um and

35:47

so any impacts uh to the surrounding

35:50

community would be limited, especially

35:52

in comparison to some of the other uses

35:54

in the neighborhood. Um like a

35:56

restaurant that's in the adjacent

35:58

property. There's a gas station um caddy

36:00

corner on the property, auto repair and

36:03

auto sales uses uh down the down the

36:05

street along Cameron Street. Um and so

36:08

again, we anticipated there will be very

36:09

minimal impacts. Uh the one thing that

36:12

we did want to make sure of um was that

36:15

parking uh would be accounted for um in

36:18

this use the properties in the downtown

36:20

center, which does not require parking.

36:22

Um but obviously if you're going to be

36:24

having events, especially with upwards

36:26

of 90 people, which is the limit that

36:28

the applicants have um indicated in

36:30

their business plan and in their

36:31

testimony at the planning commission

36:33

meeting, um you know, there's going to

36:35

be some people driving. While there is

36:37

parking um along Market Street, uh

36:40

although there is none on Cameron

36:42

Street, uh there are fairly few spaces

36:45

there, maybe four or five. Um and it's

36:47

anticipated that you know you'd have

36:49

more vehicles than that for you know

36:51

most of your events. Uh so uh we did

36:54

encourage the applicant to um secure

36:57

off- streetet parking um whether at one

37:00

of the nearby surface parking lots or or

37:03

a parking lot that accompanies another

37:05

use like across the street at 1028 uh uh

37:08

Market Street. Uh that property has a

37:11

accessory surface parking lot at the

37:12

rear of it. Um, it should be noted and

37:16

again this parking is not required and

37:18

it should be noted that there is on

37:19

street parking on North and South 10th

37:21

Street which is just a block away uh

37:23

where you can do on street parking um

37:25

along the curb there. Uh but we did want

37:27

to make sure that that uh consideration

37:30

was taken into account um in the

37:31

applicant's operation of their business

37:33

um just to ensure again that uh you know

37:37

there's safe accommodations for all

37:39

people who will be attending. Uh, with

37:42

that being said, the planning commission

37:45

recommended that the zoning hearing

37:47

board approved the request for the

37:48

following conditions. Given the location

37:50

within the AE uh flood plane and the

37:53

floodway, the applicant and property

37:55

owner must ensure that any investments

37:57

in the property are submitted to the

37:58

planning bureau for consideration and

38:00

review against the flood plane

38:01

regulations and best practices before

38:03

work can commence. and further testimony

38:06

at the planning commission meeting. Uh

38:08

the applicants indicated that there will

38:09

be only uh minimal or cosmetic

38:12

investments being made, paint, things of

38:13

that nature. Um the planning bureau

38:15

recommends the applicant consider

38:17

coordination with the owners of nearby

38:18

surface parking lots such as 1001 or

38:21

1028 Market Street to secure leases for

38:23

all street parking spaces so that

38:25

patrons do not end up parking on the

38:26

sidewalks near the property. Um, and

38:29

again, you know, that's some not

38:31

something that's required, but something

38:32

that would be recommended for the safety

38:34

of all attendees. And with respect to

38:36

the sidewalk parking, um, that's

38:38

something that the planning bureau staff

38:39

has noticed just informally while

38:41

driving by the property and not

38:43

attributable to this business, which has

38:45

not been set up yet, but other

38:46

businesses kind of on that block at that

38:48

intersection, people just feel more

38:50

comfortable driving up onto the sidewalk

38:52

so that their cars aren't going to get

38:53

like sideswiped or anything. So that's

38:55

why we recommended, you know, finding

38:57

surface parking or finding parking in a

38:59

surface lot. Uh and finally, the

39:01

applicant must ensure they conform to

39:02

the operations as outlined in the

39:04

submitted business plan, including a

39:05

prohibition on alcohol consumption and

39:07

having operations end no later than

39:09

midnight. And that is something that the

39:12

um uh Miss Salis has uh agreed to in

39:15

their testimony at the planning

39:17

commission meeting. Uh the planning

39:18

commission recommends the zoning hearing

39:20

board approve the request for the

39:21

following reasons. property is located

39:23

in a mixeduse corridor with nearby

39:24

commercial, industrial, and

39:26

institutional uses, but no nearby

39:27

residential units, and thus, the

39:29

proposed use should not have an adverse

39:30

impact on the neighborhood. The

39:32

applicant has provided a detailed

39:33

business plan confirming that no alcohol

39:35

will be consumed on site and that events

39:37

will not run past midnight. As such, the

39:39

proposal is similar to a previously

39:41

approved event space use at 2307 Berry

39:43

Hill Street, located in a residential

39:45

neighborhood which has not had adverse

39:46

impact on the community. And finally,

39:49

the proposed development will activate

39:50

an existing vacant building with a use

39:52

that will accommodate the special

39:53

occasion needs of local residents,

39:55

hoping to activate the area on nights

39:57

and weekends.

40:00

Thank you, Mr. Knight. U Miss uh Salace,

40:03

um you heard the three conditions that

40:06

uh Mr. Knight um just indicated that

40:09

were conditions from the planning

40:11

commission. Are you agreeable to those

40:12

three conditions?

40:15

Okay. Um,

40:19

Mr. Hair or Mr. or Miss Salace, if you'd

40:22

like to present your case. I mean, the

40:25

only thing is on on the parking, the

40:27

owner of the property has been in

40:29

contact with the adjacent people there.

40:31

He doesn't have any written agreement

40:32

with them. Now, he has some verbal

40:35

agreement that they are and they're

40:36

still working on that. It is tough to

40:39

get some of the other ones because the

40:41

other properties are for sale there. And

40:43

like the one parking lot behind there is

40:45

29th they want $750,000

40:50

question but they are working on on the

40:52

parking again parking she's looking at

40:55

Friday and Saturday nights I think is

40:58

the main times which is not going to be

41:00

as much parking so there should be

41:02

adequate parking you know long street

41:07

you want to maybe describe your business

41:09

a little bit better

41:11

um I've had this I've had this event

41:14

this um for about 10 years now. Um and

41:18

I've worked on it. It's one of my

41:21

passions and um I have been looking into

41:25

a more secure parking because like you

41:27

said there is street parking but a lot

41:30

of the people that would want to rent um

41:33

our my place would want secure parking.

41:36

They wouldn't want to pay for parking.

41:37

So I'm actively working um I've looked

41:41

into to actually getting in touch with

41:44

the owners for that parking right on the

41:46

back. Um, it's been pretty difficult

41:49

because they're only interested in

41:50

talking to you if you want to buy the

41:53

per property. But I'm still working it

41:56

um to secure, you know, um, and parking

41:59

would really be on Friday nights um,

42:03

depending on when

42:05

um, the event the events would happen.

42:09

Friday nights or Saturday afternoons

42:12

nights.

42:15

And could you tell the board a little

42:17

bit about the type of events that you're

42:19

envisioning to that you're going to have

42:21

at this facility? So, what I want to

42:24

provide is a space for people to hold um

42:28

special events like birthday parties,

42:32

um if a business wants to have um a

42:34

conference or any anything like that. I

42:38

I am I'm an event planner. So I want to

42:41

provide packages. People can come and

42:44

have an event place where they can find

42:47

decorations. I can help them organize

42:50

everything that they need and have them

42:54

basically

42:57

for birthday parties, weddings,

43:00

wedding receptions.

43:04

What other things?

43:08

Correct.

43:10

Oh, the the uh the

43:14

so the sweet 16 in our in my community

43:17

Hispanic which is a vast large of my

43:20

clients we celebrate the 15 year of age

43:24

and a lot of people um at that same

43:28

street market street at that church St.

43:31

Francis of Aisi they hold every Saturday

43:34

there's a King era there. So I'm a part

43:37

of St. Francis. We've been part of that

43:40

church for um many years since I've been

43:42

here. So they're always looking for a

43:45

safe place close to the church to have

43:48

their receptions and celebrate

43:50

those.

43:53

Okay.

43:55

Um, and I think you you originally

43:58

testified that uh this is something that

44:00

you've been working on for a number of

44:02

years. Do you I've been working as an

44:05

event planner decorator for 10 years.

44:08

Um, my event had used to have another

44:10

name after I had my daughter. Her name

44:12

is Vala. So, I just after her, I'm a

44:16

single mom that's just wanting to um you

44:19

know, have her and have this business

44:23

for me and my daughter. Okay.

44:27

Does the board have any questions of

44:29

either of the two witnesses?

44:33

Good evening. Um so, in terms of I guess

44:36

the the occupancy of the building, what

44:39

would you expect in terms of the maximum

44:41

number of you know, attendees at one of

44:44

the set events that you have. As I

44:47

planning

44:49

90 people,

44:53

part of that is also building

44:58

that.

45:03

Okay. Thank you.

45:10

A couple questions.

45:12

I look at your hours of operations. Is

45:14

this uh only weekends?

45:18

Um as of now, most of the events would

45:21

happen Friday. People would normally

45:23

don't do events like this. Obviously, I

45:26

am open into businesses wanting to small

45:31

conferences or things like that which

45:33

I've helped with at you know I have a 9

45:37

to5. So those girls can also

45:41

but I'm obviously open to think outside

45:44

the box for the weekdays but mainly the

45:48

main would be over the weekend rarely.

45:51

Some do, don't get me wrong, some do do

45:54

events on Mondays or Tuesdays, but it's

45:57

most

46:01

days a week

46:04

to 10 to midnight.

46:09

Second question,

46:18

this is inside the the

46:21

CRW foot plane. Okay.

46:25

Do you have any talks with CRW to make

46:28

sure that you know you put a business

46:30

there and pray? We have a humongous

46:34

storm

46:36

that could basically affect your

46:38

business insurance.

46:41

We have flood insurance.

46:58

No alcohol.

47:08

I'm just going to go around. Mr. L, do

47:10

you have any questions of the

47:11

applicants?

47:13

Okay. Yeah, Mr. Hops. Yes. I just have

47:17

an additional question. Um, I do see the

47:20

hours right are 2 p.m. to 12 a.m. Um,

47:22

have you do you have any consideration

47:24

for anything like u security or any

47:27

service like that uh for any events that

47:29

you um I have because the the front door

47:34

right

47:37

area I have thought about putting not

47:41

security but putting somebody in charge

47:44

of the doors

47:47

to and parent is not because a lot of

47:51

parents

47:52

sometimes are not you know the kid can

47:55

choose to open the door and just go out

47:57

and park

47:59

I I've thought about having a person

48:02

responsible of the door to make sure

48:04

that no kids um go out outside without

48:09

an adult just to be safe just to be on

48:13

the safe side. Gotcha. But no specific

48:16

requirements for like anyone that is

48:18

renting I mean that is using I would

48:21

provide that service when renting the

48:23

person. So I would that would be um when

48:26

I charge for said event the hours I

48:29

would include that um for the safety of

48:34

Okay. Thank you.

48:38

Any other questions?

48:43

you're not

48:45

sure

48:49

when you have events that people reach

48:53

out to police department

48:57

make sure that everything is safe even

49:00

though it's on street that's pretty

49:02

that's probably one of the easiest

49:08

I Would

49:10

you not have these events

49:16

here

49:19

and

49:23

let them know that it's going to be

49:25

something if it would be a

49:35

Okay. Um, I think I know the answer to

49:38

this, but is there anybody here uh from

49:41

the community that has any uh comments?

49:46

Just let the record show that there are

49:48

not. Um, is there anything else you have

49:51

to present or is that everything? Okay.

49:54

Does the board wish to uh do you have

49:57

any other questions or like to make a

49:59

motion?

50:03

Yeah.

50:07

will return.

50:56

Okay.

55:51

So

55:53

back into order.

55:56

All right. I am going to make a motion

56:00

to approve uh the application 26 or 2604

56:05

at 1025 Market Street. Um keeping in

56:08

mind the conditions set forth by the

56:10

planning commission.

56:13

I'll second.

56:16

Moved and seconded. All those in favor

56:18

signify by saying I. I. Okay. Motion

56:22

passes. Uh you'll receive a written

56:24

decision within 45 days of today's

56:27

hearing.

56:29

Okay. Thank you.

56:56

Okay. So, is the applicant here for the

57:00

uh 1415 Sycamore Street? You could come

57:02

up to the applicant's desk there.

57:11

Okay, we'll call the next matter which

57:14

is uh number 2605.

57:17

This is a variance and special exception

57:19

application for the property located at

57:23

1415

57:25

Sycamore Street in the city of

57:27

Harrisburg.

57:29

Um

57:32

Jeffrey Knight uh is the U

57:35

codes and zoning officer. Um you were

57:38

sworn in in previous uh hearings this

57:41

evening. Uh do you agree that you're

57:44

you'll continue be sworn in and testify

57:47

truthfully before this board? I do.

57:50

Okay. And then um the applicants, could

57:53

you please identify yourselves and spell

57:56

your last names for the record so the

57:58

court reporter

58:00

has them accurately? My name is Ali.

58:03

It's S A.

58:08

Okay. My name is Hassam Ali.

58:17

Okay. Will you both uh raise your right

58:20

hands? Uh do you swear or affirm that

58:22

the testimony you're about to give

58:24

before this board is the truth and

58:26

nothing but the truth?

58:28

Okay.

58:29

Um

58:32

and also for the record, I just want to

58:34

indicate that uh attorney Jonathan Luff

58:37

here is uh present for the solicitor's

58:40

office. Um with that, Mr. Knight, uh

58:44

would you be able to give us a summary

58:46

of this matter? Uh sure. So um the uh

58:51

application for case number 2605

58:54

uh involves the um establishment of con

58:57

of a convenience store on site uh at

58:59

1415 Sycamore Street uh which requires a

59:03

variance for the proposed use. Uh the

59:05

applicants also require a special

59:07

exception for relief from the off-

59:08

streetet parking requirements for such a

59:10

use uh because the um building occupies

59:14

the entirety of the site and therefore

59:16

no uh parking can be provided uh on

59:19

site. Um in this case we're you know as

59:23

a general rule the uh um planning bureau

59:27

and really the zoning code would kind of

59:29

discourage the establishment of a use

59:31

like a convenience store in the RM

59:32

zoning district. Um, however, uh, in

59:36

looking at the, uh, history of this, uh,

59:39

property, um, you can see that it's kind

59:43

of designed for at least commercial use.

59:45

Uh, although the property itself has

59:47

been, uh, vacant for probably 20 years

59:50

or so now. Uh, it's a little a little

59:52

tough to tell exactly how far back, but,

59:54

you know, looking at Google Streets

59:56

View, uh, there really hasn't been any

59:57

activity on site since about since at

59:59

least 2011. Um, however, when you uh

1:00:02

look back in the county's tax parcel

1:00:05

records, uh the photo that they have for

1:00:08

this property shows a sign uh over the

1:00:12

main entrance uh that appears to say uh

1:00:15

that appears to indicate that there was

1:00:16

a um store there. I think it's like

1:00:18

Manor Grocery and Deli um or grill um on

1:00:23

site. So, it does appear that there was

1:00:24

a similar use several decades ago

1:00:27

operating on site. Um, and the long-term

1:00:31

vacancy of the property also uh hints

1:00:36

and the um deteriorating condition that

1:00:38

has resulted from that vacancy also

1:00:41

hints at the difficulty um in

1:00:43

establishing a byite use for the

1:00:45

property and frankly not just under the

1:00:47

current zoning code but under the pri

1:00:48

prior zoning code as well. Um so uh that

1:00:52

long-term vacancy and the condition of

1:00:54

the property uh the planning bureau does

1:00:56

feel creates the conditions that

1:00:58

establish a hardship uh which do justify

1:01:01

uh the variance for the proposed use. In

1:01:04

addition uh to the variance there is a

1:01:07

special exception for relief from the

1:01:08

off street parking requirements. I

1:01:10

believe that based on the uh square

1:01:11

footage of the uh property the use would

1:01:15

require nine off- street parking spaces.

1:01:18

Um again as previously noted there are

1:01:21

no uh there is no space on the property

1:01:24

uh for um to provide off- streetet

1:01:26

parking. Uh the building occupies the

1:01:29

entirety of the site. Um

1:01:32

so uh the question becomes whether the

1:01:36

uh property can meet the criteria uh for

1:01:39

relief from off streetet parking. Um it

1:01:42

should be noted that uh there is a

1:01:46

significant amount of curb uh frontage

1:01:48

along um this block of Sycamore Street

1:01:51

and the blocks to the east and the west.

1:01:54

uh the blocks directly to the west um

1:01:57

has a uh elementary school uh the Fouse

1:02:00

elementary school um and uh during you

1:02:03

know informal visits to the and by the

1:02:05

and through the property um it's

1:02:08

generally observed that there is

1:02:10

sufficient parking uh on the site uh

1:02:12

along the curb um to accommodate any

1:02:15

demand uh from the proposed use. Uh when

1:02:19

I went and posted the uh property and

1:02:21

took pictures uh even though the school

1:02:23

was letting out uh which is right around

1:02:25

3:00 3:30, I was able to find a spot um

1:02:29

on the right in front of the property

1:02:31

just directly to the east. Uh and during

1:02:34

that time it's the most if anybody's

1:02:36

been there, it's the most uh you know

1:02:38

busiest time there along that corridor

1:02:40

as schools letting out and uh parents

1:02:42

are there to pick up children. Uh but

1:02:44

for pretty much any other time there's

1:02:46

um a significant availability of uh

1:02:48

parking along the street there. Uh

1:02:50

additionally um for uh uses of this type

1:02:54

uh most of the customer base and the

1:02:56

clientele come from the surrounding

1:02:58

neighborhoods and are likely to walk

1:03:00

here. Uh it's not the type of use that

1:03:02

would necessarily uh generate long

1:03:04

distance trips or have a customer base

1:03:07

from a large catchment area. Um and

1:03:10

between this availability of on street

1:03:11

parking and the expectation that the

1:03:14

customer base will largely uh walk or

1:03:16

maybe bike uh to the property, uh the

1:03:19

planning bureau feels that the property

1:03:21

does meet um the uh conditions that

1:03:25

justify uh both the variance and special

1:03:27

exception.

1:03:29

The planning commission uh is has

1:03:32

recommended that the zoning hearing

1:03:33

board approved the request with the

1:03:34

following conditions. Uh the applicant

1:03:36

must ensure the business conforms to all

1:03:38

specific criteria outlined in section

1:03:40

7-309.2Q

1:03:42

of the zoning code uh which largely

1:03:44

relates to um the storage of materials

1:03:47

outside uh having uh security uh both

1:03:50

inside and outside the building and then

1:03:51

having trash receptacles outside of the

1:03:53

building uh and the signage regulations

1:03:55

outlined in chapter 7-325 of the zoning

1:03:58

code. Uh the applicant may not keep

1:04:00

products, displays, freestanding signage

1:04:02

or any other materials in the uh yard

1:04:04

sidewalk in front of the building. And

1:04:06

finally, uh the applicant must allow the

1:04:08

codes bureau to perform a comprehensive

1:04:10

inspection of the entire property and

1:04:11

building to ensure aspects such as

1:04:13

utilities and access points are up to

1:04:15

modern codes and to ensure the

1:04:16

structural stability of the building.

1:04:18

And again, this goes back to the long uh

1:04:20

vacancy um of the uh property. it's

1:04:23

likely, you know, maybe uh stuff has

1:04:26

been taken from the building in terms of

1:04:28

like wiring. Um, and we want to make

1:04:30

sure that uh if uh the uh space is if

1:04:34

the use is approved that the space is

1:04:36

going to be safe for uh not only the

1:04:38

employees but also the general public.

1:04:40

Uh the planning commission uh is

1:04:42

recommending uh that the zoning hearing

1:04:44

board approve the request for the

1:04:45

following reasons. Proposed project will

1:04:47

address a long-standing vacant property

1:04:49

that has created a blighting influence

1:04:50

on the neighborhood. Uh the proposal

1:04:52

will reestablish a convenience store use

1:04:54

on site that appears to have existed

1:04:56

several decades ago and reactivate a

1:04:58

vacant storefront. And there appears to

1:05:00

be sufficient justification for the

1:05:02

proposed variance of special exception

1:05:03

requests including the availability of

1:05:04

on street parking along the 1300 and

1:05:07

1400 blocks of Sycamore Street.

1:05:11

Okay. Thank you.

1:05:13

Um before the applicant uh testifies,

1:05:16

I'm just going to read into the uh

1:05:18

record exhibits

1:05:20

uh that the zoning hearing board has uh

1:05:22

has received. Um I've marked as exhibit

1:05:26

B1, the proof of publication, the time

1:05:28

and place and particular nature of this

1:05:30

matter was advertised in the Patriot

1:05:33

News. It appeared in June in the June

1:05:36

1st and June 8th um uh Patriot News. Uh

1:05:40

B2 is the letter dated June 12th, 2025

1:05:44

uh from the planning director, Jeffrey

1:05:46

Knight, to the applicant notifying the

1:05:48

applicant of the time and place of the

1:05:50

hearing. Board exhibit number three is a

1:05:53

hearing notice which is posted upon the

1:05:55

property in question that occurred on

1:05:57

May 30th, 2025.

1:06:00

Board exhibit number four is the

1:06:02

applicant's notification letters to

1:06:04

required neighbors. Board exhibit number

1:06:06

five is the application packet including

1:06:08

photographs of existing conditions,

1:06:11

floor plans, and a business plan. Uh

1:06:15

board exhibit number six is the deed to

1:06:18

the property. Board exhibit number seven

1:06:21

is the planning bureau case report.

1:06:24

Board exhibit number eight is the city

1:06:26

Harrisburg planning commission

1:06:28

resolution.

1:06:30

Um and then just very quickly um to the

1:06:34

applicant, Mr. Ali and Mr. Ali, um you

1:06:37

heard of the uh Mr. Knight go over the

1:06:40

three uh conditions that are recommended

1:06:43

by the planning commission. Um are you

1:06:46

agreeable to those three conditions?

1:06:49

Okay. All right. Well, then if you want

1:06:51

to tell us about, you know, move forward

1:06:54

with your case and tell us about your uh

1:06:56

proposed store. Um Well, Mr. Knight

1:07:00

covered everything, but

1:07:03

like like you said, it was pretty much

1:07:05

designed to

1:07:34

Okay.

1:07:40

Do either of the board members have any

1:07:41

questions?

1:07:49

A couple of questions

1:07:55

issues

1:07:59

and if my memory serves me well that

1:08:02

that area can be

1:08:05

exciting.

1:08:07

Okay.

1:08:09

So how are you going to go about

1:08:11

addressing that? So we have security

1:08:14

here.

1:08:20

onsite security they worked out

1:08:23

agreements with HBD

1:08:27

well there's always like

1:08:30

I think like a year

1:08:33

couple years back it was exciting as you

1:08:35

said but I think it's gotten a lot

1:08:38

better

1:08:45

security cameras

1:08:48

information.

1:08:51

So they're 24 hours, but now

1:09:08

I see your application.

1:09:13

It wasn't specific enough for me. What's

1:09:16

your hours?

1:09:18

The last meeting we said

1:09:26

it just depends on the

1:09:29

winter times maybe

1:09:40

Have you made any neighbors to basically

1:09:47

also talked to a lot of people were just

1:09:49

sweeping outside.

1:09:56

So from the neighbors we've got pretty

1:09:59

positive feedback

1:10:14

in that area.

1:10:20

They're

1:10:28

there on the other side.

1:10:44

Brother

1:10:56

looked at that. Yeah, we did. But we

1:10:59

serve as

1:11:01

trying to bring in like products.

1:11:20

I also seen your revenue strategy

1:11:23

accepting cards, credit cards, something

1:11:27

with the

1:11:29

compic

1:11:37

we're just going to have

1:11:46

That's all I have. Thank you.

1:11:49

Mr. Hops, you have any questions? Um, I

1:11:52

had some of the same ones that Mr. Fips

1:11:54

have, but I just just one additional

1:11:56

question. So in terms of you being a

1:11:59

convenience store, is it just directly

1:12:02

just for the sale of food and beverage

1:12:05

and some other items or is it going to

1:12:07

be things like I know you mentioned

1:12:08

Delhi. So is it going to be you know

1:12:10

where you're uh preparing ready to serve

1:12:14

food and different things of that

1:12:15

nature?

1:12:18

Okay.

1:12:20

All right. Thank you. I have one more

1:12:22

question.

1:12:26

Convenience stores are a generator of

1:12:28

certain amount of refuge on our streets.

1:12:31

How will you handle basically keeping

1:12:34

your place clean and keeping the

1:12:35

surrounding areas clean? Sorry, but

1:12:40

I got a lot of cleanups and I call and I

1:12:43

can tell you go you buy it, walk outside

1:12:46

the store and it gets discarded and that

1:12:48

basically contributes to the

1:12:54

I want to have it occur

1:13:01

because it's a pretty heavy traffic

1:13:02

area.

1:13:10

Yeah. Yeah.

1:13:14

City convenience store

1:13:19

say okay they keep the place clean

1:13:21

because I we see that so you are going

1:13:24

to basically pay close attention to that

1:13:27

because neighborhood doesn't need

1:13:29

anything else negative about it and

1:13:31

trash refuge is something that affects

1:13:34

that neighborhood.

1:13:42

I I just had one question just just for

1:13:45

the full scope. Um other than food

1:13:48

products, are you going to be selling

1:13:49

anything else at your store like tobacco

1:13:52

products or vaping or anything like

1:13:55

that? Maybe some

1:14:00

Okay.

1:14:05

I was just wondering not and then Okay.

1:14:10

And then um I had a quick question for

1:14:12

Mr. Knight. Um you had indicated before

1:14:16

um that you didn't believe that it was

1:14:19

really possible for this site to be

1:14:22

developed uh as a permitted use in this

1:14:26

zone. Um it's been vacant, you said

1:14:30

probably for around 20 years or so.

1:14:33

at at least I mean we have no record

1:14:35

even in our in DSIT which is where we

1:14:37

keep uh our merkantile records and

1:14:40

building permits and stuff. We have no

1:14:41

record of anything there and I think

1:14:43

looking back into Google Streets view as

1:14:45

far back as it goes which is like 2011

1:14:48

it doesn't seem to be any um real formal

1:14:50

activity on site and you don't know like

1:14:54

looking at that structure I mean a lot

1:14:56

of the permitted uses in the RM zone are

1:14:59

dwellings attached to attached,

1:15:02

detached, manufactured homes,

1:15:05

um multi-family homes, um supportive

1:15:11

housing, adult daycare,

1:15:14

um and you don't you don't foresee um

1:15:17

this property being converted into any

1:15:20

of those uses? Uh I don't think so.

1:15:22

Again, the first floor, I mean, the

1:15:24

building does look like it was uh

1:15:27

constructed for commercial use. Um, and

1:15:30

I think with like the layout of the

1:15:32

first floor, um, there's there's not a

1:15:35

whole lot of space there. So, something

1:15:36

like an adult uh, daycare, it tends to

1:15:39

be larger. You have concrete spaces, um,

1:15:42

you know, things like kitchens and

1:15:44

larger stuff like that. Uh, that I don't

1:15:46

think a property like this would

1:15:48

accommodate a use like that. Okay. And

1:15:50

it looks like from the photographs that

1:15:52

it had some um two or three of those

1:15:56

steel rollup doors in the front. Was

1:16:00

that for um deliveries, do you think, in

1:16:03

the past, or was that opened up in the

1:16:05

past for I think those are for security

1:16:08

reasons. Um it'd be something that like

1:16:10

you'd see in a city or something when

1:16:12

they close at night so that somebody

1:16:14

doesn't break in through the window or

1:16:16

something. If you look far enough back

1:16:17

in the county's records, there were like

1:16:20

a it was like a three side by side

1:16:22

windows on the left and I think the side

1:16:24

on the right would have been a door. So

1:16:26

there were like two doors in the front.

1:16:27

Um so I think it was purely a matter of

1:16:30

security there, not like delivery or

1:16:32

something. Okay. And Mr. Ali, either one

1:16:34

of you, if have you raised those doors,

1:16:37

are there windows underneath? Okay. And

1:16:41

that would be the the front of the

1:16:42

building when somebody would come in.

1:16:44

And then you'd be able to secure them

1:16:46

with those steel doors

1:16:49

secur.

1:16:58

Is there a way to lock them? Yeah.

1:17:04

Okay.

1:17:06

Are there any other questions from the

1:17:08

board?

1:17:10

Mr. L, do you have any questions?

1:17:23

We'll go off the record. Take a quick

1:17:25

recess.

1:30:29

Okay. So, just to just to make sure

1:30:31

because there was a special exception.

1:30:33

So you're you're um making a motion to

1:30:37

approve the uh variance and special

1:30:40

exception request

1:30:42

um condition upon the the uh three

1:30:45

recommended conditions of the planning

1:30:47

commission as uh delineated uh by uh in

1:30:53

the planning commission's um resolution

1:30:56

and by um Mr. Knight here this evening.

1:31:01

All right. Second. moved and seconded.

1:31:04

Um, all those in favor signify by saying

1:31:06

I. I. Okay. Um, so congratulations. Uh,

1:31:13

you'll receive an actual written

1:31:15

decision within 45 days of today's uh

1:31:19

hearing. Okay. Thank you.

1:31:32

Second,

1:31:43

you're going to get used to these. I

1:31:46

will

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.