0:04
the U Harrisburg Planning Commission
0:06
meeting to order at approximately 6:34.
0:14
you received your September 3rd and
0:18
October 1st meeting minutes. Are there
0:21
any changes, deletions, additions?
0:26
I'll make a motion to approve both the
0:28
September and October minutes.
0:30
>> Is there a second?
0:32
>> It's been moved a second for approval.
0:35
All those in favor state by saying I.
0:38
>> Opposed. Abstension. Motion carried.
0:43
Under old business, there's none.
0:47
Under new business, item number one is a
0:49
special exception application for 1414
0:53
North Cameron Street, which is zone
0:57
It's filed by Joshua Gray and GNRLP.
1:01
Is to request relief from four of the
1:03
required All Street parking spaces
1:07
associated with the expansion of the
1:08
school public and private and primary or
1:13
secondary use of site.
1:15
>> Uh yes. So uh the applicant is
1:17
requesting relief from four of the
1:19
required off street parking spaces
1:20
associated with the expansion of the
1:22
school public or private primary or
1:24
secondary use on site. The capital
1:25
academy student population is increasing
1:27
from 115 students to 147 students and
1:30
the staffing will increase from 40 staff
1:32
to 52 staff which incre which which
1:34
increases the required off street
1:35
parking from 69 spaces to 89 spaces
1:38
because there will only be 72 spaces on
1:40
site after the installation of modular
1:42
classrooms in the parking lot and
1:43
reconfiguration of the parking lot. ZHB
1:46
approval of a special exception is
1:47
required for relief from 17 off-
1:49
streetet parking spaces. So that was the
1:50
way that I had calculated it based on
1:52
the numbers that we had um in compared
1:54
to what was submitted. Uh the property
1:56
at 1414 North Cameron Street is a 2.33
1:59
acre lot featuring a three-story 24,312T
2:03
structure which was constructed in 1942.
2:06
Property is bounded by an unadressed
2:08
parcel to the north, North Cameron
2:09
Street to the east, and the property at
2:11
1400 North Cameron Street to the south
2:13
and west. This detached structure
2:15
features elements of a vernacular
2:17
institutional architectural style.
2:18
Character defining features include the
2:20
brick facade, the monumental concrete
2:23
entryway, the horizontal brick and
2:24
concrete bands, the regular fenestration
2:26
pattern, a modern building addition in
2:28
the northwestern corner, and the fenced
2:29
in playground on the southern elevation
2:31
of the building. The main entrance
2:33
features full view metal door double
2:34
doors flanked by divided light
2:36
sidelights and topped with a large
2:37
transom and concrete header with the
2:38
property address. It is accessed by a
2:41
short flight of concrete stairs with
2:42
metal railings. Other entrances
2:44
primarily feature full view metal doors.
2:47
Penetration primarily features evenly
2:49
spaced plate glass windows around the
2:51
building, although there are some
2:52
locations featuring glass block infill.
2:54
The main structure is topped with a flat
2:56
rubber roof with a newer addition
2:58
featuring a metal roof. The building is
3:00
fronted by a large accessory parking lot
3:02
and both building and parking are
3:03
buffered by landscaping with larger
3:05
trees along the northern and southern
3:06
property boundaries. There is little
3:09
there's a large billboard at the
3:11
northern edge of the parking lot. The
3:13
Cameron Street corridor features little
3:14
in the way of architectural character
3:16
and the building design and sighting
3:17
differ from many of the surrounding arch
3:18
industrial properties. Although the
3:20
brick facade and some of the
3:21
architectural embellishments are
3:22
reflected in older industrial properties
3:25
and the housing development nearby. As
3:27
such, the property does contribute to
3:29
the architectural and historic character
3:32
The planning bureau staff recommends the
3:34
request be approved with the following
3:36
conditions. Uh the applicant must
3:38
coordinate with Capital Region Water
3:39
regarding the site disturbance and
3:40
proposed configuration of the parking
3:42
lot to ascertain what storm water
3:44
management or storm water mitigation
3:46
effect efforts may be necessary. And as
3:48
the proposed parking configuration will
3:50
have vehicles facing the residential
3:52
properties across Cameron Street. The
3:54
applicant should relocate the parking
3:55
lot several feet to the west and install
3:57
landscape screening along at least the
3:59
eastern frontage of the uh proposed lot.
4:02
The plane bureau would recommend that be
4:03
extended along the entire Cameron Street
4:05
frontage of the property. Planning
4:07
Bureau staff recommends the request be
4:08
approved for the following reasons. The
4:10
applicant has met the criteria necessary
4:11
for special exception and the proposal
4:14
should have a negligible impact on the
4:16
surrounding neighborhood. Because the
4:17
use is already operating on site,
4:19
approval of the proposal will not alter
4:20
the essential character of the
4:21
neighborhood and will provide benefits
4:23
such as the ability to enroll new
4:24
students. And finally, if the conditions
4:26
of approval are adopted, the project
4:28
will result in the property overall
4:30
being brought into better conformance
4:32
with the zoning code.
4:34
>> Okay. Thank you, Jeff. Um, could you
4:37
name could you state your name, address,
4:40
and relationship to the project?
4:42
>> Good evening, commissioners. My name is
4:44
Ash Mcome. I'm an attorney with MC Wall,
4:47
100 Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
4:49
And with me is Josh Gray, principal with
5:03
>> And your relationship to the project?
5:06
>> Um, I'm actually the owner of the
5:07
property. I'm 90% owner of the property
5:09
and owned it since about 2007.
5:14
>> We operated some businesses there and
5:19
were sold and building was vacant for
5:21
several years. We were able to find
5:28
was empty for several years.
5:32
>> You both heard the staff report. Are you
5:35
acceptable in the conditions?
5:37
>> Yeah, c certainly the first condition
5:41
as the second one. We'll look into what
5:44
what we can do from a landscaping
5:45
standpoint whether it goes the whole
5:47
length of Cameron. It's not there right
5:49
now uh landscaping, but we'll we'll look
5:52
into it and work with Sure.
5:58
Um, commissioners, I have no questions
6:00
at this time, so I'll um call on you to
6:04
any concerns you have may have. And I'll
6:07
start with Commissioner Tul.
6:09
>> Yeah, the uh the trailers that are being
6:12
brought on site, is that additional
6:14
>> Yeah, it's additional classroom space.
6:16
They're modular, but they're going to be
6:18
permanent. Uh so they'll be there, you
6:20
know, on a foundation kind of like
6:24
Yeah, I've never heard the questions.
6:25
Pretty straightforward.
6:31
>> will the the new the new modular
6:33
structures you're bringing in, will that
6:35
make the property become come to
6:37
capacity or will you have room to grow
6:43
>> I mean, the further we grow,
6:52
>> right. We did a traffic stop and
6:54
fortunately for us um these students are
6:57
on bus for reasons administratively.
7:01
So most of them there's not a lot of
7:02
high individuals that could drive but
7:05
all these children in the school and a
7:07
lot of as well basically uses the bus
7:12
system. So we did a parking study like a
7:15
traffic study and had the cameras out
7:17
there that just to get a idea of who was
7:25
So even though 76, you know, so it
7:27
really comes down to the question of
7:29
right now because we as
7:33
>> uh but at the moment even though
7:39
you know 39 is what the traffic study
7:43
>> So the answer is probably no.
7:53
>> Commissioner Mard.
7:56
>> Thanks. Um, yeah. So, is the I mean, the
7:59
fact that you have to add two modular
8:01
units, is the building pretty well built
8:03
out then to like schoolwise capacity,
8:08
>> Yeah. There is a there's a brand new
8:13
structure in the back uses like it's
8:15
like there's a space in the back that
8:17
they use, but they use it for like a gym
8:23
And the problem with the building is the
8:32
>> Is that the flood?
8:38
>> Yeah, it should be the 100year flood
8:40
>> But the building as you can see is in
8:42
the flood way itself. And so we trying
8:44
to not do any additions.
8:53
the idea is trying to keep it out.
8:57
>> Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I mean,
9:00
parking in a flood way, flood plane
9:02
isn't as concerning, right, as opposed
9:05
to having classrooms right in in there.
9:09
>> um that makes a lot of sense. I I
9:12
appreciate that you took the effort to
9:14
put a parking study together. I think
9:16
that was really helpful. I would have
9:17
had a lot more questions had I not seen
9:19
those numbers and maybe even disbelief
9:22
that the numbers were that low. But
9:24
seeing the study and the fact that like
9:26
you said it's everyone's bus in even
9:29
faculty take the bus. Um you don't have
9:31
16 year olds typically driving even
9:34
their bus in as well. It sounds like so.
9:36
>> Yeah, I think the letter from the school
9:38
mentioned that there there are some 16
9:40
year olds. This year there are none that
9:45
>> and I think that the ratios over
9:54
>> Okay. Yeah. Thank you. I have no other
9:56
questions. [clears throat]
9:58
>> Uh Commissioner Jordan.
10:00
>> Yes. I think this question is more for
10:02
Jeffrey. um with these modular permanent
10:05
structures, is that going to be another
10:07
set of approvals that are going to be
10:09
needed separate from this?
10:10
>> Uh yeah, so they've submitted the flood
10:11
plane development approvals that for
10:13
anything with a new installation with a
10:15
footprint in the flood plane. Um and
10:17
it's um I don't know if it's on that map
10:19
there gave you, but it's just outside of
10:20
the floodway. Um so it's um if it were
10:23
in the floodway, that'd be a different
10:24
issue, but it's um in the flood plane,
10:26
so it's just subject to chap the
10:28
regulations in 7315 of the zoning code.
10:31
Okay. That's all. Thank you,
10:34
>> Commissioner Vincent.
10:36
>> No, everything looks good. The study is
10:39
showing that you guys never had any
10:40
types of complaints for parking at all.
10:42
No, no types of assemblies or anything.
10:51
>> Um, I'll go to the public right now. If
10:54
there anyone's for against this project,
10:57
stand and state state your name and
10:59
address. I'll start to my left.
11:08
Thank you, Commissioner. This is pretty
11:11
straightforward. Um, could I get a
11:15
>> Motion to approve conditions.
11:20
>> Second to approve project with the
11:23
conditions. All those in favor say
11:32
>> thank you. Appreciate your time.
11:33
>> Thank you very much. Thanks.
11:48
Item number two is a land development
11:51
plan for 1332 North Second Street, which
11:55
is zon residential medium density. It's
11:58
followed by Adam Bredman and with
12:01
Damman's Properties LLC.
12:04
Uh it's to expand the existing
12:06
non-conforming conforming multif family
12:09
dwelling use on site by adding eight new
12:13
units to the existing five units on site
12:16
by converting space occupied by the
12:19
former funeral home. Okay.
12:22
>> Um yeah, so the applicant is proposing
12:23
to expand the existing non-conforming um
12:25
use on site by adding eight new units to
12:27
the existing five units um by converting
12:31
space occupied by the former funeral
12:33
home. The project proposes units in a
12:35
variety of configurations and sizes from
12:37
studios to two-bedroom apartments and
12:39
from 290 ft to 850 ft. uh proper and
12:43
this is the um second aspect of the
12:46
zoning relief that the applicant came
12:47
through I believe last month for um or
12:50
two months ago. Uh the property at 1332
12:53
North Second Street is a 48 acre lot
12:56
featuring a three-story structure
12:57
resulting from a combination of three
12:59
separate buildings into a mixeduse
13:00
building, a funeral home and apartments
13:02
with a total area of 8,428 ft which were
13:06
constructed circa 1900 and a separate
13:08
storage garage of 220 ft which was
13:11
constructed 1957. Property is bounded by
13:13
Calder Street to the north, North Second
13:15
Street to the east, Safford Street to
13:16
the south, and the property at 124
13:19
Safford Street, and a small grosser
13:20
alley to the west. The semi- detached
13:22
structure features elements of an
13:23
indeterminate architectural style.
13:25
Character defining features include the
13:27
formstone facade and water table, the
13:29
multiple access points sheltered by
13:30
awnings around the building, the regular
13:32
fenestration pattern, the upper floor
13:34
decks on the rear elevation roof, and
13:35
the freestanding signs near the parking
13:37
lot and building entrances. There are
13:39
multiple entrances throughout the
13:40
building, although the main entrance on
13:42
the eastern elevation features panel
13:44
double doors and a full view door set in
13:46
simple frames which are sheltered by a
13:48
large awning with square posts. Other
13:50
entrances on the front and side
13:51
elevations feature the same types of
13:52
doors and awnings. Penistration on the
13:54
front elevation features two over two
13:56
windows set in simple formstone
13:58
surrounds with soldier course headers
14:01
and sills wrapped in aluminum.
14:03
Tenistration on the side elevation is
14:04
more regular and features two over two,
14:06
one over one and plate glass windows.
14:09
The structure is primarily topped with
14:10
flat rubber roofs. The other major
14:12
feature of the site is a sizable surface
14:14
parking lot occupying the southern half
14:15
of the property which is bordered by
14:17
planting beds with trees along the
14:18
eastern frontage with Second Street and
14:20
a 4ft high chain link fence along the
14:21
southern frontage with Safford Street.
14:23
Although the architectural style differs
14:25
somewhat from nearby buildings,
14:27
specifically with respect to the
14:28
formstone and awnings and large parking
14:30
lot distinguishes the properties from
14:32
others in the historic district, the
14:33
building height, massing, and location
14:35
along lot lines does generally reflect
14:37
the built environment of the surrounding
14:38
community. As such, the subject property
14:40
minimally contributes to the
14:41
architectural character of the
14:43
neighborhood. The planning bureau staff
14:45
recommends the request be approved with
14:46
the following conditions. Any exterior
14:49
alterations to the property must be
14:50
submitted for review by the city's
14:52
historic preservation specialist and may
14:54
require harb approval of a certificate
14:55
of appropriateness application. The
14:57
applicant must coordinate with the
14:59
department of public works regarding the
15:00
size, location, and screening of any
15:02
required refuge containers. The planning
15:04
bureau recommends the applicant consider
15:06
eventually consolidating all refuge
15:08
storage and access in the existing
15:09
carport along the CER street frontage of
15:11
the building. The planning bureau staff
15:14
recommends the request be approved for
15:15
the following reasons. The adaptive
15:17
reuse of a vacant and underutilized
15:19
funeral home into apartments represents
15:20
a sensible expansion of the existing
15:22
multif family dwelling use on site and
15:24
the project can adequately address the
15:25
primary concern regarding such
15:27
proposals, specifically the provision of
15:29
off- streetet parking for tenants and
15:30
their guests. Other conversions of
15:32
former commercial spaces elsewhere in
15:33
the neighborhood have demonstrated such
15:35
projects do not adversely impact the
15:37
neighborhoods in which they are located
15:38
and often help catalyze other
15:39
improvements in those communities. And
15:41
finally, the proposed redevelopment will
15:43
add new residents to the neighborhood to
15:44
activate the street on nights and
15:45
weekends and grow customer base to
15:47
support local businesses while providing
15:49
a new neighborhood focused space and
15:51
will provide additional units to the
15:53
Midtown housing inventory.
15:56
>> Thank you. Could you state your name,
15:58
address, relationship [clears throat] to
16:01
>> Yes. Uh Michael White, 1419 North Third
16:04
in Harrisburg. I am the um operations
16:07
director for Brandon Group.
16:10
>> Okay. Uh you heard the staff report with
16:13
the conditions. Are you acceptable of
16:17
>> Uh yes. Um we you know for any exterior
16:22
um changes we would of course seek
16:24
approval um through the appropriate
16:26
body. Uh in terms of the consolidation
16:29
of refu that's something that we have
16:32
planned. In terms of the location we're
16:34
going to um try to determine the best
16:36
location. We we I think that that is a
16:39
nice uh covered location, but that what
16:41
what we want to do is consolidate, but
16:43
it might not be in that exact location
16:45
just because there could be some windows
16:47
potentially two apartments there that
16:49
could be access to an apartment. So,
16:50
we're just going to from a resident
16:52
quality standpoint, but I kind of am of
16:54
the mind to consolidate. So, that makes
16:55
a lot of sense to me.
16:59
Um I the only concern I was I had
17:02
initially was the parking but I would
17:05
got remember this um you had this
17:07
project here before and you had that
17:10
extra those extra parking spaces. So
17:13
>> pretty much covers the parking. Um
17:17
commissioners if you have any questions
17:19
or concerns and I'll start with
17:23
Yeah, as it turns out, they have plenty
17:27
>> no, I was at the zoning hearing board.
17:30
They they didn't they overturned the uh
17:33
relief provided to lease those
17:35
properties, those parcels out.
17:46
>> Yeah, I'm done. I'm finished.
17:52
Commissioner Commission Reed,
17:54
>> I have no questions.
17:56
>> Commissioner Mark, I
17:58
>> think this is pretty straightforward. I
17:59
just want to confirm there are no
18:01
external uh improvements to the site
18:07
>> No, Commissioner Jordan.
18:15
>> Okay, we'll go to the public. Are there
18:18
any concerns or questions to my left?
18:25
On my right. Okay. Commissioners, as
18:29
everybody says, this is pretty
18:30
straightforward. Could I get a motion?
18:34
>> Motion to approve with conditions.
18:36
>> Is there a second?
18:38
>> It's been moved and second for approval
18:40
of the project with the conditions. All
18:42
those in favor by saying I.
19:11
Item number three. This is a land
19:13
development plan for 2601 North Third
19:16
Street. Uh it's uh building number one
19:19
which is zone commercial neighborhood.
19:22
It's uh followed by Gregory Alquist with
19:26
Penmark Hburg Holdings LLC and is to
19:29
convert the vacant hospital building
19:31
into a mixeduse building featuring 130
19:35
residential units with one and two
19:37
bedroom configurations.
19:40
Uh, the applicant proposes to convert
19:42
the vacant hospital building into a
19:44
mixeduse building featuring 130
19:45
residential units, associated amenity
19:47
space for tenants, and both space
19:50
reserved for retail uses and space set
19:52
aside for future development proposals.
19:54
The project proposes units in a variety
19:56
of configurations and sizes from studios
19:58
to three-bedroom apartments. That should
19:59
be three and not two in the uh summary
20:02
there. Um, and from 544 ft to 1143 ft.
20:07
The property at 2601 North Third Street
20:09
is a 6.36 acre lot featuring a sprawling
20:11
medical campus including a 216,440t
20:16
facility which was constructed 1926 and
20:18
an 83,870 square 76T facility which was
20:22
constructed 1957. Property is bounded by
20:25
Wikiniscoco Street and the property at
20:27
2645 North Thirdrd Street to the north,
20:29
North Fourth Street to the east,
20:31
Polyclink Avenue to the south and 2645
20:33
North Thirdrd Street to the west. This
20:35
property features a sprawling industrial
20:37
campus with three to six story buildings
20:38
that previously accommodated the poly
20:40
clinic hospital. However, the current
20:41
proposal only involves the southernmost
20:43
building. Character defining features
20:45
include the X building shape, the brick
20:48
facade, the decorative entrance, the
20:50
prominent concrete and masonry bands
20:52
around the building, the consistent
20:53
fenestration pattern, and the former
20:55
utility room with accompanying large
20:56
smoke stack. There are entrances in a
20:58
variety of designs and sizes around the
21:00
building, many of which are solid metal
21:02
utilitarian doors. Although the main
21:04
entrance on the western elevation
21:05
features full view double doors, metal
21:08
double doors topped with a large metal
21:10
transom featuring the property address
21:12
all set within a prominent masonry
21:13
surround featuring sconces, a decorative
21:17
um of a former awning and a Juliet
21:20
balcony pediment with dentals. It is
21:22
accessed by masonry steps and a concrete
21:25
ADA ramp with metal railings.
21:27
Administration also includes a multitude
21:29
of windows in sizes and configurations.
21:31
Although most are plate glass windows
21:33
with concrete sills and simple brick
21:34
surrounds. The ground floor windows on
21:36
the eastern elevation are metal divided
21:38
light windows with those at the northern
21:40
end being older. There is a large
21:41
multi-story wall of metal awning windows
21:43
at top louvers in the utility room. The
21:45
structure is primarily topped with flat
21:47
rubber roofs. Building features a
21:49
well-maintained landscaped buffer along
21:50
the southern and western frontages with
21:52
bushes, shrubs, and some larger, more
21:55
mature trees in the western yard.
21:57
Property differs marketkedly from the
21:58
surrounding residential community and
22:00
even from other institutional buildings
22:02
such as the steel school, the Scottish
22:04
Wright Temple, the Zebo and the Zebo
22:06
shrine, which feature more innate
22:08
architectural elements. However, it does
22:10
have a significant architectural and
22:11
historic character in its own right and
22:12
is individually listed on the National
22:14
Register of Historic Properties and
22:15
thereby contributes to the character of
22:19
The planning bureau staff recommends the
22:21
request be approved with the following
22:22
conditions. [clears throat] Uh, the
22:24
applicant must reconstruct portions of
22:26
the Fourth Street sidewalk to be ADA
22:28
compliant and specifically the loading
22:30
dock in the middle of the block. The
22:31
bureau recommends that other points with
22:33
vehicular crossings use driveway designs
22:36
with consistent raised crosswalks across
22:38
them for safer vehicular conflict
22:40
points. The applicant must coordinate
22:43
with the Department of Public Works
22:44
regarding the size, location, and
22:45
screening of any required refuge
22:47
containers. The planning bureau
22:49
recommends the applicant consider
22:50
eventually consolidating all refuge
22:51
storage and access in the existing
22:53
vehicular access areas along the fourth
22:55
street frontage of building one. The
22:58
applicant must ensure that
23:00
[clears throat] any proposed signage for
23:01
the businesses on site is in conformance
23:02
with the applicable regulations or they
23:04
must secure the necessary zoning relief.
23:06
And finally, the planning bureau
23:08
recommends that sheltered bike parking
23:09
be provided at the main entrances to
23:10
both the residential and commercial
23:12
components of the property with secured
23:14
bike storage potentially located in one
23:16
of the proposed amenity areas on the
23:18
first floor. Planning Bureau staff
23:20
recommends a request be approved for the
23:22
following reasons. The adaptive reuse of
23:24
a large vacant and underutilized
23:26
institutional building into a mixeduse
23:28
building with lower level retail store
23:30
spaces and apartments above represents a
23:32
unique and challenging project in the
23:33
city and will support redevelopment of
23:35
the remaining buildings that comprise
23:36
the former hospital complex.
23:38
Additionally, the applicant is retaining
23:40
flexibility in the project by reserving
23:41
portions of the building for future
23:42
development proposals which will help
23:44
the project grow more organically to
23:46
support the needs of existing res
23:47
residents of the neighborhood and future
23:49
residents of the development. Successful
23:51
redevelopment of the institutional site
23:53
may help catalyze redevelopment and
23:55
reactivation of other institutional
23:56
sites in the north to the north
23:58
including the former William Penn school
23:59
and the ZBO shrine. Other conversions of
24:02
former commercial or institutional
24:03
buildings elsewhere in the city have
24:05
generally demonstrated such projects do
24:06
not adversely impact the neighborhoods
24:08
in which they are located and often help
24:09
generate other improvements in these
24:11
communities. And finally, the proposed
24:13
redevelopment will add new residents to
24:15
the neighborhood to activate the street
24:16
on nights and weekends and grow customer
24:17
base to support local businesses
24:20
while providing a new neighborhood
24:22
focused space and will provide
24:24
additional [clears throat] units to the
24:25
uptown housing inventory.
24:28
>> Thank you, Jeff. Uh gentlemen heard the
24:31
staff report with the conditions. Are
24:33
you acceptable of those conditions?
24:37
and I skipped over. Could you state your
24:40
name and address our relationship to?
24:43
>> Sure. Uh my name is Gregory Hogquist.
24:45
I'm with Penmark Harrisburg Holdings.
24:47
We're at 1000 Germantown Pike in
24:50
Plymouth Meeting PA and I'm the owner.
24:54
>> I name is David Johnson
25:00
>> located at the same address. Uh John
25:03
Anderson with Cornstone Consulting, 213
25:05
West Main Street, Landdale, PA1 19446,
25:08
uh civil engineer for the project.
25:14
you did say you're accepting acceptable
25:19
>> Um my my only concern again usually is
25:24
parking, but I since I have been in the
25:27
building and my offices before I
25:30
retired, so I know There's lots of
25:32
parking in that place. So that's not a
25:34
concern with me, Mr. Commission to
25:42
>> In light of the fact he used to work, I
25:44
just curious why they aren't proposing
25:46
to put statue out there. [laughter]
25:49
>> Was that the package
25:53
>> to get approved that might have
25:55
need? No, no, it's no questions. I think
25:58
it's great. I mean that I think I may
26:00
have stated the last time you were here
26:01
that the most utilized underutilized
26:04
real estate in Harrisburg's between
26:06
there and the William Penn campus. So
26:08
glad to see it's see you moving in.
26:14
>> I have no questions either.
26:19
>> I agree with Commissioner Tool's
26:27
>> What's that? No, but not with not about
26:32
>> Maybe a fountain would be more
26:36
>> statue [laughter] in the fountain.
26:38
>> Yeah, right. Yeah, let's get creative.
26:42
Um, [clears throat] I think the only
26:47
um, I've been trying to visualize the
26:52
lower level, which is called the
26:55
basement, but it's the the elevation
26:58
varies. So, you have some parts of the
27:00
building where it's walk out onto grade,
27:02
not necessarily below grade,
27:06
>> So, that's reserved for retail. Um,
27:10
and where's the loading dock?
27:12
>> It's on the back side. It's on the lower
27:15
>> of Fourth Street.
27:17
>> In a little courtyard.
27:20
So, would that that would remain I'm
27:23
just thinking about future retail uses
27:25
being able to use the loading dock for
27:28
let's say if you have a restaurant,
27:30
right, that does end up in there, right?
27:32
And where those trucks are going to be
27:34
going in and out of the building and the
27:36
space. So, we're fortunate to have
27:40
uh separate courtyards around the back.
27:42
Um so, for example, that loading dock is
27:44
in a its own courtyard area. There's
27:48
actually parking spaces in there as
27:50
>> Okay, that's okay.
27:52
>> It's in the back.
27:56
got it. So, that kind of does actually
27:59
>> Yeah, it's pretty well laid out for
28:02
>> There's also a couple of entrances. If
28:05
you look at this the campus where the uh
28:08
emergency drop off was along poly clinic
28:12
that's actually at the lower level and
28:14
then you come up around to the top and
28:15
that's the front entrance to the lobby.
28:18
>> So there's a lot of separate entrance uh
28:21
>> Yeah. The campus.
28:23
>> Yeah. So you would even be able to sort
28:26
of differentiate tenant entrances from
28:30
retail entrances too. That's kind of a
28:33
plan there. Okay. Actually lends itself
28:36
>> Yeah. Okay, I'm with you. Uh I think
28:39
that's the only questions I had.
28:40
>> Well, the other question you had was
28:41
bike rocks and we will have plenty of
28:43
>> Oh, that's right. I did ask that on the
28:45
last application, right? But then Jeff,
28:47
see Jeff already put the comment in
28:49
there. So, as a condition,
28:51
>> so I asked that we bring drawings of
28:53
building three with the bike rack shown
28:55
so I can show you to you. But, uh, no,
28:57
we we expect there will be a lot of, um,
29:00
you know, use of bicycles. So, we want
29:02
to make sure we have
29:03
>> I would think so.
29:05
>> That's what we're trying to promote,
29:07
>> um you know, bringing the streetscape
29:09
alive and work. So, we're going to have
29:13
plenty of bike racks in various
29:14
locations and building.
29:17
>> Nice. You have plenty of space
29:18
>> for the retail and for like the workers
29:21
in the in the commercial.
29:23
>> And we are segregating. Uh I don't know
29:25
that the drawings that you all have show
29:30
Jeffrey mentioned that we're And we went
29:33
over this with Jeffrey and shared the
29:34
drawings with him that we have to
29:37
segregate some future development here.
29:39
This building is 200,000 square feet
29:42
>> and for 130 apartments and retail.
29:46
There's still 60 70,000 square feet left
29:49
over. We're limited by zoning of what we
29:52
can do here. Um so, you know, we'll have
29:56
to see what happens down the road, but
29:58
we've got an easy way to segregate off
30:02
some area to allow for future
30:04
development. We'll see what what the um
30:08
the neighbors need and
30:10
>> what makes sense.
30:13
>> Yeah. Thank you. I don't have any other
30:15
>> We're not relying on that. It's part of
30:18
like if it never gets developed, it's
30:20
not the end of the world. So, it's a
30:26
>> Commissioner Jordan,
30:27
>> no questions. Commissioner Vincent.
30:30
>> Um, no questions. Exciting to see, you
30:33
know, always like to see new um new
30:35
residential and student commercial
30:53
>> We kind of just keep we make up
30:56
I have more I can give you.
30:58
>> That's okay. Uh I'll go to the public.
31:02
Uh 714 against this project
31:10
My right. Again, this is pretty
31:13
straightforward. And
31:19
>> Motion to approve with conditions.
31:25
I think Commissioner Jordan.
31:29
>> Move second approval of the project with
31:32
the conditions. All those in I
31:47
>> Okay. We're under business.
31:50
Uh there's nothing on the um agenda for
31:53
other business. uh in I did want to uh
31:56
bring up one point in uh a discussion
31:59
from last month's meeting about the um
32:04
open house that kind of city council had
32:05
with the different boards and there was
32:07
a discussion about having a um end of
32:09
the year report which I don't know that
32:11
I've done you know during my tenure here
32:13
really u and I am going to try and uh
32:16
have something uh to you all by
32:19
beginning uh middle maybe middle of
32:22
December and also have something you to
32:24
city council just as a synopsis of what
32:26
you guys have all tackled here and maybe
32:28
some of the things we're looking to do
32:29
next year. I think I've talked about
32:31
doing some packages of zoning map amend
32:33
or zoning code amendments uh with regard
32:35
to like signage and uh maybe um the use
32:38
table in chapter 73057 of the zoning
32:41
code uh to begin you know working on
32:44
those maybe for introduction in January,
32:47
maybe not till February depending on how
32:48
much I can get done. But, um, I I think
32:51
that was a it was a good, um, comment
32:54
that we should be doing a little
32:56
something even if it's just a single one
32:58
side of a piece of paper and we're just
32:59
kind of, you know, accounting for what's
33:02
what's gone on here. But, um, I do think
33:04
it's, uh, helpful to not only city
33:07
council, but members of the public and
33:09
yourselves to kind of, you know, uh,
33:11
summarize what the commission has done
33:14
over this year. Um because a lot of you
33:17
know what we do at the beginning of the
33:18
year can maybe be forgotten by this
33:20
point. Um and so u and even having an
33:23
update on maybe some of those projects
33:24
what what was approved in January. What
33:26
happened with that? Did they move
33:27
forward with that? So I'm going to look
33:28
to do a little something a little write
33:30
up for report for you guys for sometime
33:32
in December. And obviously you don't
33:33
meet so that'll just be something
33:35
transmitted via email.
33:40
I'm good. Is that something like Joe
33:42
needs to review and approve or do you
33:45
just send it on our behalf?
33:48
>> Yeah, I mean I can do that certainly is
33:50
send it to you all, make sure you're
33:52
happy with what with with what's in it.
33:54
I think it's largely going to be um you
33:56
know just academic really of just an
33:59
accounting of what's been what you guys
34:01
have been doing this year and um and
34:03
like I said hopefully some some goals
34:05
for next year. Uh and if you want to add
34:08
something to it, you know, certainly
34:09
feel free to do that.
34:16
>> Is there anything for the order
34:20
Uh if not, before I ask for German, I'd
34:23
like to wish everyone a happy holidays,
34:27
Thanksgiving, and Christmas, and
34:30
presents will be accepted by me.
34:35
>> you want your statue in
34:36
>> bronze? Went to his head down.
34:40
>> And with that, can I get a motion for