Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Policy Work Session & Special Legislative Session 9/30/2025

4:03:36760 summary words · ~4 min readEnglishBy The City of Harrisburg - WHBG20Transcribed Jun 15, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The Harrisburg City Council unanimously approved a controversial $14.4 million budget reallocation to rebuild the historic Broad Street Market brick building, drawing heavily from the city's general fund balance. The vote was accompanied by severe council criticism over an 11th-hour data dump and a policy work session highlighting critical vacancies across municipal boards.

This session marks the critical funding greenlight for the multi-million dollar Broad Street Market recovery, revealing both the deep fiscal strain on Harrisburg's municipal reserves and the severe communication gaps between the city administration and its legislative body.

Section summaries

0:00-10:00

Audit Committee Presentation

optional

Austin Cheers explains the Audit Committee's role in reviewing city financials. He calls for a local CPA to fill their sole vacancy, and the council requests their overdue five-year ordinance review report.

Provides general board operations but contains no legislative decisions.

10:00-20:00

Citizens Law Enforcement Advisory Committee (CLEAC)

watch

CLEAC Chair Coach Mechi discusses the committee's newly filled nine-member board. He outlines their strategy to bridge community-police tensions through constructive neighborhood engagement and youth sports programs.

Offers key updates on local police oversight and community relationship-building efforts.

20:00-35:00

Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Status

watch

Pamela Parson reports that the EAC has not met once since appointments, despite having a quorum. Council members pledge to step in and coordinate with the city's sustainability coordinator to kickstart the committee.

Highlights a major municipal administrative gap and outlines steps to fix it.

35:00-1:10:00

Redevelopment Authority & Land Bank

watch

Brian Davis and Jackie Parker detail the HRA and Land Bank's role in blight remediation and housing partnerships. Council requested HRA's property inventory list to be posted online to make land development accessible to everyday residents.

Addresses crucial zoning, blight remediation, and housing policies directly affecting the city's landscape.

1:10:00-1:30:00

Historic Architectural Review Board (HARB)

optional

Trina Gribble explains HARB's purview over six municipal historic districts. She suggests shifting from paper packets to digital files and creating better directional signage to draw tourism to Harrisburg's historic zones.

Useful for historic property owners but largely logistical.

1:30:00-1:50:00

Parking Authority Bottlenecks

watch

Ver McKisick explains how the 2013 bankruptcy lease binds the city's parking system to PEDFA. He details how the non-compete clause prevents the city from building new parking structures and harms private downtown construction.

Exposes the severe ongoing structural financial constraints resulting from Harrisburg's historic bankruptcy.

1:50:00-2:15:00

Planning, Zoning, and Water Boards

optional

Representatives outline operations for the Planning Commission, Zoning Hearing Board, and Capitol Region Water. Highlights include how zoning board decisions are appealable and the upcoming CRW Dehart Day community tour.

Consists of technical board parameters with little conflict.

2:15:00-2:35:00

Work Session Public Comment

optional

Local citizens voice concerns regarding HRA access, infrastructure issues (such as speed bumps damaging bikes), and a dispute regarding Capitol Region Water billing practices.

Includes localized resident complaints but lacks broader legislative policy.

2:35:00-2:55:00

Special Legislative Session & Reallocation Introduction

watch

Council transitions to the special session, honoring the late Pastor D. Gilmore. Accounting Manager Brian McCutchen presents the financial layout of the $14.4M reallocation request to rebuild the Broad Street Market.

The core legislative business of the meeting, mapping out millions in taxpayer dollars.

2:55:00-4:00:00

Resolution 63 Debate and Vote

watch

Council aggressively debates the funding sources (including general fund cash, ARPA interest, and CDBG). Despite intense anger over the administration's late communication and lack of diverse hiring mandates, council passes the resolution 6-0.

The climactic, high-stakes final debate and vote on the Broad Street Market rebuild.

Key points

  • Broad Street Market Fiscal Strain — To fund the $14.4M gap of the $19.12M market rebuild, the city is pulling $9.12M directly from its $19.5M general cash reserve. This leaves a massive dent in the general fund balance, posing future fiscal risks for capital improvement projects.
  • Environmental Advisory Council Inactivity — Despite having a legal quorum of appointed members, the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) has not met once since its members' appointments due to a lack of coordination with the city's sustainability coordinator.
  • The Economic Shackle of the 2013 Parking Concession — The Parking Authority Chairman explained that the 2013 'Harrisburg Strong' bankruptcy recovery plan transferred parking operations to PEDFA under a 40-year non-compete lease, severely hindering current downtown development.
  • Legal Limitations on Supplier Diversity — Because the city's previous diversity ordinance was thrown out in court and the new disparity study remains unratified, the city cannot legally enforce minority- or women-owned business quotas on the 11 Broad Street Market construction packages.
If you thought we were just going to rubber stamp $19 million, you've got the wrong council. Aaliyah Green
As usual with this administration, we continue to receive information at the 24th hour, forcing city council to vote immediately on a resolution. Danielle L. Hill

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

1:35

Thank you for your patience. I was

1:37

having some technical difficulties.

1:40

The time is 5:38 p.m. I would like to

1:44

call our policy work session to order.

1:52

Mr. Chale, could you please call the

1:54

role?

1:57

>> Miss Daniels.

1:59

>> Miss Davis,

2:00

>> present.

2:02

>> Miss Green,

2:03

>> present.

2:03

>> Mr. Jones,

2:04

>> here.

2:05

>> Miss Rolls,

2:08

>> present. Can you hear me?

2:09

>> Yep.

2:10

>> Mr.

2:11

>> Okay, good.

2:12

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:14

>> present.

2:15

>> Miss Hill,

2:16

>> present. Thank you. Uh good evening

2:19

everyone. The topic for this evening's

2:22

policy work session is around boards and

2:27

commissions and many of you are

2:29

volunteers on boards and commissions

2:32

throughout the city. Um so the purpose

2:35

of this session is simply to establish a

2:37

shared understanding of the purpose

2:40

structure and ongoing work of city

2:42

affiliated boards and commissions while

2:45

also encouraging greater public

2:47

participation in their efforts.

2:50

I would like to note that we did not ask

2:53

all members of all boards and

2:55

commissions to attend. Rather, we we

2:58

requested that one or two designated

3:02

representatives present on behalf of

3:05

their body uh to briefly cover the

3:08

following areas. Their general function,

3:11

what is the role of your board and

3:13

commission and the scope of its work?

3:17

Current membership status. How many

3:19

seats are filled? Which terms are near

3:22

expiration? Are there any vacancies?

3:25

Public engagement. How often do you

3:27

meet? Are meetings open to the public?

3:30

How is input received? Reporting

3:33

structure. Who does your body report to?

3:36

Council, the mayor, a department, or

3:39

another oversight entity? And finally,

3:42

qualifications for appointment. What

3:45

experiences or characteristics are most

3:48

valuable for prospective members?

3:51

So we will um allow each board to share

3:56

a presentation answering those

3:59

questions.

4:02

So we will begin with the audit

4:04

committee. The members of the audit

4:06

committee if you could please join us.

4:21

Hi there.

4:22

>> Hi.

4:23

>> My name is Austin Cheers and I currently

4:25

serve as the chair for the the city

4:28

audit committee. Um, in terms of our

4:30

general function, we we kind of act as

4:32

an intermediary between the city and

4:35

council and the the inter the uh

4:37

independent auditors. We help interpret

4:39

any results that they may give us. Um,

4:42

and we provide independent review and

4:45

oversight of the city's financial

4:47

reporting process,

4:49

um, the internal controls and the

4:51

independent auditors. We help assess the

4:54

city's accounting and auditing practices

4:57

and help ensure that the independent

4:58

auditors have objectively assessed the

5:02

government's financial reporting um,

5:05

practices. Um, in terms of membership,

5:09

we we we hold a board of five currently.

5:12

There's four of us. One of us, one of

5:13

our long-term members just left a little

5:15

bit ago. Um, we have five-year terms,

5:19

and I believe we just were all sworn in

5:22

maybe maybe two years ago. I I don't

5:24

have the exact date, but um and one of

5:26

the members was filling in for a a

5:29

three-year term because he was taking

5:31

over a another member's term. Um anyway,

5:34

but but we meet we meet quarterly or as

5:37

needed,

5:39

especially whenever the the audit is

5:41

starting to wrap up and the folks over

5:43

at Boyer and Ritter want to meet more

5:45

often to to prevent or to uh to present

5:47

their report to everyone. And um when

5:50

when Brian over in the accounting staff

5:52

is is is starting to ramp up his work.

5:55

So towards the end of the audit, we'll

5:57

meet more often, but usually we try to

5:59

stick to once a quarter. Um,

6:03

in terms of

6:07

love everyone on the board to have uh a

6:10

good knowledge of of financial reporting

6:12

and um you know some some experience in

6:15

the private or or or even government

6:18

sector in in being able to interpret

6:20

results and and look at the numbers and

6:23

we require one member to have a CPA have

6:26

their CPA designation and and I hold

6:28

that. So, um, yeah, I hold that role,

6:32

but yeah, we're we're looking for one

6:34

member right now to fill the vacancy,

6:37

and we would love if that person also

6:39

had a CPA. I know there's not a lot of

6:41

CPAs that live in the city, but it is

6:43

also open to, um, individuals that have

6:47

have worked in the city for at least a

6:48

year, too. So, um, if anyone would love

6:51

to step up to that, that would be great.

6:53

So, but right now we have a good crew

6:56

and we just finished um a couple months

6:59

ago reviewing the 2022 audit and I know

7:02

that the staff is working hard to get

7:03

2023 done and we'll likely have a

7:06

meeting here at the end of October to

7:08

assess where where things currently

7:10

stand with that. So, thank you.

7:14

>> Thank you.

7:20

>> Yes.

7:23

I was just going to note uh formal

7:26

reports and advice that are provided by

7:28

the audit committee. An annual report is

7:31

submitted to city council and the mayor

7:34

summarizing the committee's oversight

7:36

activities. Five-year review and

7:39

recommendations are submitted to city

7:41

council advising uh on ordinance changes

7:44

needed due to new laws, regulations, or

7:47

standards.

7:50

Um, I did want to note that five voting

7:53

members are appointed by city council

7:56

for the audit committee. Yep.

7:58

>> So, it's our responsibility to find

8:01

someone to fill this vacancy. Um, I will

8:04

open the floor to my colleagues who may

8:06

have some questions for you. Um, I'll

8:08

begin with Councilman Jones.

8:10

>> Thank you, President Hill, and thank you

8:13

for your service and thank you for

8:14

coming tonight and share.

8:16

>> Thank you. Um I pretty much get what the

8:19

uh audit committee uh does and again um

8:22

I just like to say thank you for your

8:24

work. Um all of these committees and

8:26

everybody is serving on is very

8:27

important to the city

8:29

>> and I feel that this is very necessary

8:31

so our public can kind of get a better

8:33

understanding of how our uh local

8:35

government works. Um, the only thing

8:37

that I would um ask,

8:41

>> yeah,

8:41

>> is um the last uh bullet point, the

8:45

five-year review of recommendations

8:47

submitted to city council advising on

8:48

ordinances and um changes needed due to

8:50

new laws and regulations. Um I haven't

8:53

seen one yet and

8:55

>> certainly not in the two years that I've

8:56

been here. Yeah, I'll have to look to

8:58

see when the last one was submitted. And

8:59

then

9:00

>> and even at the the last one, I would

9:01

like to um look for that one and then

9:04

all also one u moving forward. Um if you

9:07

have one that was last here before you,

9:09

I would like to see that

9:11

>> and then um just let me know when the

9:13

next one comes out uh you know or reach

9:15

out to President Hill or uh Mr. Trudale

9:19

because I think that's important. You

9:20

know, it's very important right now

9:22

because a lot of laws and we know laws

9:25

change just about every day. is right,

9:26

Mr. Love.

9:28

>> They change every day. So, yeah, that's

9:30

all that's all I have, man. So, uh

9:32

again, thank you for your service.

9:34

>> Thank you.

9:34

>> Thank you, President H.

9:36

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

9:38

questions?

9:40

>> Thank you, Madam President. Um, no real

9:42

questions. I just wanted to thank

9:44

everyone in attendance tonight and their

9:46

ability to serve and their willingness

9:47

to serve. And I just like to thank Mr.

9:50

Trudale, Mr. Humphrey, and of course,

9:52

Mr. Mike in the clerk's office. um

9:54

because I've saw uh Mr. Jared had showed

9:57

me how intense it is with all the

9:59

boards, all of the responsibilities. So,

10:02

my hat goes off to anyone willing to

10:04

serve in this capacity. So, thank you

10:06

all.

10:07

>> Thank you.

10:07

>> Thank you,

10:08

>> Councilwoman Ross. Any questions?

10:12

>> Uh good evening everyone. Uh I don't

10:15

really have any questions either. I just

10:17

want to say thank you for everyone who's

10:18

there today. um especially the board

10:21

members to explain in more detail to the

10:24

residents um about the boards. Um I just

10:28

I'm thank you to the clerk's office and

10:31

also you President Hill for putting this

10:32

together. I think it's so important uh

10:35

so we know uh what boards need to be

10:37

filled, how can they be filled, but also

10:39

the job that they have because the

10:41

boards are just as important as city

10:43

council and our administration. So, um I

10:46

look forward to the continued

10:48

conversation and also look forward to um

10:51

the boards that get filled after

10:52

tonight. So, thank you. No questions.

10:55

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

10:57

questions?

10:58

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Um

10:59

it's good to see you again. I don't have

11:01

any questions about the audit committee.

11:03

Uh as the budget and finance chair, I am

11:05

a non- voting member of the committee,

11:07

so I've got to I've been privileged to

11:09

sit in on some of the meetings and hear

11:10

the discussions. Um I definitely thank

11:13

you all for the work you do, for the

11:14

expertise you have. Um, and that's kind

11:16

of it. So, I look forward to continuing

11:18

to work with you.

11:19

>> Thank you.

11:21

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

11:23

questions?

11:24

>> Thank you, Vice uh President Hill. Thank

11:27

you. Good evening, everyone, and thank

11:29

you for being here this evening, Mr.

11:31

Chairs.

11:33

I don't have any questions. I'll just

11:35

look forward to you coming back in with

11:38

the five-year report.

11:39

>> Sure.

11:40

>> Okay. Yep.

11:40

>> Thank you.

11:41

>> Love to get that to you guys.

11:42

>> Thank you so much. Thanks for being

11:44

here. Thank you.

11:45

>> Um and for sharing about the audit

11:47

committee.

11:48

>> Yep. Thank you all.

11:49

>> Thank you.

11:51

Next we have the Citizens Law

11:53

Enforcement Advisory Committee.

12:01

>> Good evening everyone.

12:04

>> Good evening.

12:06

>> How you doing? Well, this is my first

12:08

time um actually seeing or hearing about

12:11

these questions. So, you know, I'm going

12:12

to do my best as I go uh through this

12:15

process.

12:15

>> Okay. A few notes. Um, of course, uh

12:19

hopefully everybody knows what this uh

12:21

this board consists of or and then the

12:23

meaning of the citizen law enforcement

12:25

advisory board. Uh we um are coming

12:28

together as citizens to, you know, um

12:31

deal with different issues we may have

12:33

in our or questions we may have from the

12:36

officers and as well as our uh

12:38

community. So we can be the liaison and

12:40

and get some of these things uh taken

12:42

care of and make sure nothing's being um

12:44

looked uh bypassed and during the

12:47

process of you know due diligence and

12:49

things of that nature. And even on the

12:52

other side um making sure the law

12:53

officers that uh you know of course

12:56

interact with our community are being

12:58

professional and if they have any

12:59

questions and concerns we're able to

13:01

talk to the community and bring them

13:03

together as well. Um so you know I think

13:06

I this is a great honor to be you know

13:08

the um chair of this board. I've been in

13:10

this community my whole life and I'm

13:12

seeing different things happen that you

13:14

know some positive some negative. It's a

13:16

balance of the both. Um we have seen a

13:18

lot of negativity. Um but I think once

13:20

the biggest thing is we don't we don't

13:22

have enough relationships built you know

13:25

for our community to move forward the

13:27

right way. So that's our goal as well.

13:29

We're trying to build relationships, get

13:31

an understanding of some things, come up

13:33

with some new ideas. Um, right now we

13:35

meet uh once a month until we really get

13:38

a understanding of our structure and our

13:40

power and also, you know, what our

13:42

limitations are um during the process

13:45

because we don't want to overstep our

13:46

bounds to the point we think we are or

13:49

we seem as though we are officers of the

13:51

law. you know, this uh is a committee

13:53

that really is trying to help, you know,

13:56

like I said, the process uh you know,

13:58

with that with our community. Um we have

14:01

a total of nine members. Uh seven were

14:06

uh at this point appointed, you know,

14:09

and they went through a process. Uh two

14:11

were also added that we made us a total

14:13

of nine. We have just done that uh a few

14:16

weeks ago. So now we have a total of

14:18

nine once they but two of need to be

14:20

approved by city council still but uh

14:22

hopefully that goes well. So we'll have

14:25

a total of nine members which that's the

14:27

amount members we need to be successful

14:29

for this cle board. I really think it's

14:32

going to be a powerful thing in the

14:33

city. So one thing we are doing we are

14:36

taking our time with this process. We're

14:38

trying to get an understanding of every

14:40

nuance or angle to make sure that we are

14:43

representing ourselves and our community

14:44

in the best way. So, you know, bear with

14:47

us as we go through this process and,

14:49

you know, learn, you know, our positions

14:52

and, you know, um, how we need to serve,

14:55

you know, through with serve our

14:57

community and our officers. So, that's

15:00

pretty much it. If y'all have any

15:01

questions, I'll be glad to answer any.

15:03

>> Thank you so much. Um, as I did with the

15:06

audit committee, I would like to review

15:09

the formal reports and advice that, uh,

15:12

CLEAC provides. An annual report will be

15:15

submitted to the mayor and city council

15:18

summarizing KEak's activities, findings,

15:21

and recommendations.

15:23

Policy and practice recommendations

15:25

issued to the Harrisburg Bureau of

15:27

Police, the mayor, and city council on

15:30

policing practices, community concerns,

15:33

and legislative or administrative

15:35

reforms. Investigating findings. Cleak

15:39

may issue reports on law enforcement

15:41

practices supported by its ability to

15:44

request records and in some cases issue

15:47

administrative subpoenas during

15:49

misconduct investigations. Finally,

15:52

community engagement reports provides

15:55

updates to the public on crime

15:57

prevention activities, neighborhood

15:59

participation, and police community

16:01

partnership initiatives.

16:04

Again, I'll open the floor to my

16:07

colleagues who may have some questions.

16:08

I'll begin with our public safety chair,

16:11

Councilman Jones.

16:12

>> I got the lucky number today.

16:15

Um, how you doing, Mr. Walker? Thank you

16:17

again uh for your willingness to serve

16:19

as well. Um, this was a very much needed

16:23

um committee to actually come together

16:26

and I know that we are still trying to

16:28

make sure that this um goes as smoothly

16:31

as possible. My only question for you uh

16:34

would be um you know we see a lot of

16:39

contentious

16:41

things in our community between our

16:43

community and the police and I've heard

16:46

some of the overview on um with this

16:49

board how it functions and how it should

16:51

be functioning but um just on a personal

16:53

note you know for the community as well

16:56

with you being the chair um how do you

16:59

see uh bridging that gap between uh the

17:02

police and the community in a

17:05

constructive manner. Well, something in

17:08

that in that sense uh one of the main

17:11

things are coming up with uh creative

17:13

ideas where uh officers in the community

17:16

are interacting in positive environments

17:19

and situations because a lot of their

17:21

interactions are in negative you know

17:23

times or you know it's a lot of friction

17:26

or misunderstanding but I think once the

17:28

relationships are built in the sense of

17:30

now officers are showing up at youth

17:32

sports events things like that they're

17:35

really connecting with the community um

17:37

outside of a a policing or you know

17:40

they're just protecting and serving and

17:42

sometime at that point they're just

17:44

being one of the guys. So you want to

17:46

bring uh be able for the community

17:48

embrace the officers as they they live

17:51

in this community they're part of this

17:52

community which they are because they

17:54

spend at least eight hours a day or more

17:56

you know in our community so they become

17:58

a part of it. So one of the biggest

17:59

things for me myself um even before

18:03

being selected as the chair is you know

18:05

one of my biggest uh attributes is

18:07

building relationships. So you know just

18:09

finding those creative ways and

18:11

hopefully we can get the understanding

18:13

of both sides to work together and you

18:15

know create as much safety and peace

18:18

within our community as possible.

18:21

Yeah, I want to thank you and um that's

18:23

pretty much all for me and and again

18:25

I'll just thank uh you for having the um

18:29

levelheadedness to come into this space.

18:31

Uh again, not to be um someone that's

18:33

going to argue with the police, but

18:35

someone willing to be that conduit and

18:38

bring the community and the police

18:39

together. So, thank you for your

18:40

service. Appreciate you.

18:43

>> Thank you. Uh Councilman Rodriguez, any

18:46

questions?

18:48

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh thank you

18:50

chair Walker for joining us this uh

18:52

evening. It was amazing attending the

18:54

first official cleak session and seeing

18:57

you know the first procedures going

18:58

along as one of the champions for the

19:01

initial bill 8 of 25. It's just amazing

19:04

to see this thing up and running with

19:06

legs. Although it's still in infasy

19:08

stage I just look forward to seeing the

19:10

amazing work you guys are going to do on

19:12

that board. So thank you for everything.

19:14

>> You're welcome.

19:17

>> Thank you Councilwoman Ross. Any

19:19

questions?

19:20

>> Uh, good evening. Uh, Mr. Walker, thank

19:23

you for, uh, coming in today to explain

19:25

more about, uh, the cle board. I don't

19:28

have any questions.

19:30

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

19:33

questions?

19:34

>> Thank you, President Hill. How are you,

19:36

uh, Coach Mechi? Still weird to call you

19:39

Mr. Walker, so I'll stick with Coach

19:41

Mechi. Um, thank you for your

19:44

willingness to serve and to take on a

19:45

leadership role on this board. Um, being

19:47

on a board or a commission is hard work

19:49

to begin with. Being an inaugural member

19:52

is a completely different ball game

19:54

because you're really setting that

19:55

foundation. Uh, we spent many years

19:57

putting this together on paper, but now

19:59

you get to like actually bring it to

20:00

fruition. Um, so I appreciate that the

20:03

work that you're doing as well as the

20:04

work that you've done in our community.

20:06

I don't really have uh many questions.

20:08

This is still in its infancy and I look

20:09

forward to working with you.

20:11

>> Thank you.

20:13

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

20:16

questions?

20:16

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening,

20:18

Mr. Walker.

20:19

>> Good evening, ma'am.

20:21

>> I may have missed this answer, but when

20:24

was the last uh public meeting?

20:28

>> Um, exactly. It was It was only like two

20:32

weeks ago maybe. And then um

20:34

>> Oh, two weeks ago.

20:36

>> Yes, I think. And it's

20:38

about two weeks ago. So, we have a

20:40

schedule for the rest of the year as

20:42

well. We'll be meeting on every third uh

20:44

Wednesday of the month. So, you know,

20:48

that's our tentative schedule. So, we'll

20:50

be um meeting, you know, this month as

20:52

well, the third here uh here at 6:00 uh

20:57

in the same location. So, please feel

21:00

free to come out, you know, and support

21:02

in any way you can and bring, you know,

21:04

any kind of questions or concerns, you

21:05

know, because you're part of this

21:06

community as well, you know, so we need

21:09

all the input we can get.

21:11

Thank you very much. Um,

21:14

and is the information in here in terms

21:18

of like I'm just wondering the times

21:21

maybe not but

21:23

>> the meeting um times and schedule is not

21:26

included. This is just an overview of

21:29

each of the uh boards and commissions.

21:32

It provides their general function and

21:34

then shares their formal reports and

21:36

advice provided. Then uh generally

21:40

there's a second page with each one that

21:42

includes the seats and composition, the

21:44

meeting schedule um and then the current

21:47

members.

21:49

>> Thank you. And thank you Mr. Walker.

21:51

I'll plan to attend one of your

21:53

meetings.

21:54

>> Thank you.

21:55

>> Thank you. I just wanted to note Mr.

21:57

Walker shared that the cle board is

22:01

comprised of nine members. So, seven

22:04

were appointed by council and two

22:05

atlarge appointments uh were made by the

22:08

committee and their term length is three

22:11

years. So, I just wanted to note that.

22:14

Thank you.

22:15

>> Okay.

22:16

>> Thanks for being here this evening. You

22:18

too.

22:18

>> Appreciate it.

22:20

>> Next, we have the environmental advisory

22:23

council.

22:37

Good evening. Good evening, council.

22:40

>> Good evening.

22:40

>> Pamela Parson, and I'm representing the

22:43

environmental advisory board tonight.

22:46

Um,

22:48

Rafika Muhammad, who I believe was the

22:50

last chair, was hoping to be here

22:53

tonight and she could not be and asked

22:55

me if I would come in herstead. I'd like

22:59

to start out by saying I I pulled up

23:02

from the city's website today uh what it

23:06

says about the environmental advisory

23:10

council and particularly the members and

23:14

terms. Uh it lists uh both Rafika

23:18

Muhammad and Leland Nelson as their

23:21

terms expiring in 2021.

23:24

And I know that Rafika was uh

23:27

reappointed when we were and it lists uh

23:31

for vacancies. According to what's on

23:35

the website, there are seven volunteer

23:38

members of which three are appointed by

23:41

the mayor and four are appointed by city

23:44

council. And this says the EAC was

23:48

established for the purpose of

23:50

overseeing, discussing, and

23:52

disseminating information on

23:54

environmental issues in the city. And

23:57

the EAC shall consist of these seven

24:00

members. Um, in response to your

24:04

questions, I I started with that preface

24:07

because we have never met since um my

24:12

appointment. So, I will answer your

24:15

questions to the best of my ability

24:18

based on what I think the council should

24:21

do, but I don't really know for sure. In

24:25

terms of um

24:28

general function, it is my understanding

24:31

that the EAC covers environmental and

24:34

sustainability efforts in the city, both

24:37

initiating projects and programs on

24:40

their own and bringing them forth to the

24:42

city and supporting and promoting um

24:47

things that the city that is created

24:49

inhouse in the city as well as

24:52

supporting and promoting

24:54

uh other organizations projects that

24:58

operate within the city.

25:00

In terms of our current member

25:03

membership status,

25:05

um I think there is one person that I've

25:10

never met that we've never met whose

25:14

name I'm not even sure of. And then

25:17

there's Katherine Scott, Rafika

25:19

Muhammad, and I. And we were all

25:22

appointed by council at the same time,

25:24

and I believe our terms expire in 2027

25:29

or 2028.

25:31

In terms of public engagement, again, we

25:34

have never met since uh we have been

25:37

appointed or reappointed in Rafikica's

25:40

case. Um, and I believe that our

25:43

meetings would and should be open to the

25:46

public. Um, as we would be covered by

25:49

the Sunshine Act. Um, in terms of

25:53

reporting structure,

25:55

again, I believe that in addition to

25:58

making regular reports to council, and I

26:01

would, excuse me, I would assume those

26:04

would be quarterly because that's sort

26:06

of when council likes to see things. Um,

26:10

that our committee also relates directly

26:13

with the sustainability coordinator whom

26:16

we've never met.

26:19

And so there might be other reporting

26:21

requirements that might be um made

26:25

around a grant or something like that.

26:28

In terms of qualification for

26:30

appointments, again, I've never seen

26:32

anything that says that these particular

26:35

things are what would be used to

26:38

appointing someone, but I would say that

26:41

the most desirable experiences and

26:45

characteristics of an EAC member would

26:48

be experience and commitment to the

26:51

environment, especially understanding

26:54

and appreciating how that plays out in

26:56

an urban setting.

26:58

and in multicultural

27:00

um neighborhoods. Some understanding of

27:03

environmental racism and environmental

27:05

justice would be strongly encouraged and

27:10

backgrounds and experience should be

27:11

diverse and varied from gardeners and

27:14

farmers to photographers

27:17

and artists to environmental educators

27:21

and designers to burers and all types of

27:25

conservationists.

27:26

This committee embraces I would hope

27:30

both those who have formal training in

27:32

the things I have mentioned as well as

27:35

those who would have uh lived

27:38

experiences

27:39

that would uh relate to the committee's

27:43

work and I rafica and I thought that out

27:48

of the box urban environmental thinkers

27:50

should be encouraged to apply and that

27:55

is what I'm able to share. share on you

27:57

share with you based on my understanding

27:59

of what the committee does.

28:01

>> Thank you very much. Thanks for being

28:03

here this evening. Uh let me start by

28:06

clarifying the general function. Um

28:08

since the committee has not met, it is

28:12

intended to meet monthly or as needed to

28:15

address environmental issues and provide

28:17

input on city practices.

28:19

The council should prepare, adopt, and

28:22

revise bylaws to govern its operations,

28:26

advise on waste management and recycling

28:29

matters with emphasis on public

28:32

education.

28:34

Uh, the council may invite

28:35

representatives from city departments,

28:37

the Lancaster County Solid Waste

28:39

Management Authority, and the

28:41

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental

28:44

Protection to provide reports and

28:46

updates on city facilities. Review and

28:49

authorize grant applications for

28:51

environmental projects subject to

28:54

council approval and ensure city

28:57

residents receive by annual recycling

29:00

and environmental education materials

29:02

included with sanitation billings or the

29:06

city's events calendar.

29:08

In terms of formal reports and advice

29:11

provided, uh the environmental advisory

29:16

council should submit an activity

29:18

report. Um it should be provided to city

29:22

council upon request. Educational

29:25

publications should be sent to all city

29:27

residents via sanitation billings and

29:30

other city publications either by

29:33

annually at the request of the EAC.

29:37

Finally, environmental notices should be

29:40

received from the city clerk and

29:42

reviewed by the EAC. An example would be

29:45

a leaking underground storage tank or D

29:49

site reports. So, I just wanted to note

29:51

that

29:54

this council is comprised of seven

29:56

members. Three are appointed by the

29:58

mayor and four are appointed by council.

30:01

the individual that you mentioned that

30:03

you have never met, her name is Cheyenne

30:06

Johnson and she um her term expires

30:10

April 7th, 2028. She was uh appointed

30:15

earlier this year by council. Um your

30:18

term

30:19

uh Miss Muhammed and Miss Scott's terms

30:23

all expire on January 1st, 2027. So you

30:27

were correct there. Um it's in limbo

30:30

because while you have a quorum, the

30:34

city's uh sustainability coordinator,

30:37

they do have one. Her name is Maline

30:39

Good. She couldn't join us this evening.

30:41

So I'm hopeful that she is your liaison

30:44

um between the administration and the

30:48

environmental advisory council. So

30:50

hopefully she'll be in touch soon

30:51

because you do have a quorum and you

30:53

could conduct business or host meetings.

30:56

uh the three vacancies are the three

30:59

appointments that are needed uh from the

31:02

mayor. So that's out of our control, but

31:06

hopefully Matteline Good will be in

31:08

touch soon. Um I will open the floor to

31:11

questions from my colleagues. This time

31:13

I'll start with Councilwoman Ross who

31:16

serves as our parks, recreation, and

31:19

enrichment uh committee chair.

31:25

Thank you, President Hill. Um, thank

31:27

you, uh, Chair Parsons, for coming in

31:30

and, um, speaking to us about, um, the

31:33

the board you're currently sitting on

31:35

and, um, just giving us some updates on

31:38

things that you haven't been able to

31:40

accomplish or that you weren't sure

31:42

about. Um, cuz that's what we're here

31:44

for, too, to help you out. So, I know

31:46

that you said that um you hadn't um

31:49

spoken with the city um

31:52

Oh, I'm sorry. It just slipped my mind,

31:54

but you just said it. This

31:55

sustainability coordinator. Correct.

31:57

Yes. Sorry, it went right past me for a

32:00

minute. Um I will definitely reach out

32:02

to um see why they haven't met with you

32:05

um and also see you know uh when they

32:08

will be meeting with you because that's

32:09

very important um for the environmental

32:12

board and for uh them to converse with

32:15

you. Um uh so I will reach out and see

32:18

what's happening on that end and try to

32:20

get some answers for you. But um thank

32:22

you President Hill for the updates that

32:24

you just gave. Um, I don't have any

32:26

questions, but of course, um, Chair

32:28

Parsons, if you need anything, if there

32:30

any way I can help, please reach out to

32:32

me. Um, and I will, uh, do whatever I

32:35

can.

32:37

>> Let me, let me be clear that I am not

32:40

the chair. I am just the person who is

32:42

available to come tonight. And I believe

32:46

that the committee's last chair was

32:49

Rafika Muhammad.

32:51

>> Thank you for clearing that up. I

32:54

appreciate that.

32:56

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

32:59

questions?

33:02

>> Thank you, Madam President. Thank you,

33:03

Miss Parsons, for joining us. Um, I

33:06

actually la about a month ago uh was

33:09

trying to put this together with Mr.

33:10

Trudale, reached out to the mayor's

33:12

office um and let them know that there

33:14

is a quorum now. So, she did let me know

33:17

personally she'll reach out to the

33:18

sustainability coordinator to get it up

33:20

and running. Not sure what that timeline

33:22

looks like, but as uh Councilwoman Ross

33:25

indicated, I wouldn't mind setting up

33:27

some meetings with you to have followup

33:29

because I too would love to see the EAC

33:31

operational again. Thank you.

33:34

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

33:37

questions? Um yes, but I think it was

33:40

kind of answered um with those three

33:43

vacancies and um but knowing that you

33:45

guys have a quorum now um I would hope

33:48

that we can try to get something even

33:50

with the sustainability coordinator. So

33:53

as uh Councilwoman Ross and Councilwoman

33:55

I mean Councilman Rodriguez just stated

33:58

hopefully they they can work something

33:59

out with administration um because this

34:01

is an important board. This is I mean

34:04

all of them are but this is this one

34:06

right now in the times that we're living

34:07

in in in our environment uh uh in our

34:10

environment we see a lot of things

34:12

happening um you and I communicate a lot

34:15

uh about some of the environmental

34:16

things that we see in in in our

34:19

community. So I think you know any

34:21

system that's built is built to work

34:23

harmoniously. So this to me is our

34:26

kidney.

34:28

uh we have to keep flushing it right now

34:30

until you know we we're on dialysis. But

34:33

I believe that um that this is a a board

34:36

and I hope you guys really can get

34:37

something scheduled and um we're here to

34:40

help in any any way that we possibly

34:42

can. So um again, thank you for your

34:45

service and being someone that's uh

34:47

truly concerned not just about our

34:48

environment but as our city as a whole.

34:50

So thank you.

34:53

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

34:55

questions? Thank you very much,

34:57

President Hill. Um, I don't have any

34:59

questions for you. Uh, I thank you for

35:00

being here tonight. I thank you for your

35:01

willingness to serve. Um, and I thank

35:03

you for your honesty, uh, you know, for

35:05

not coming here and trying to act like,

35:07

oh, yeah, we've been doing all these

35:08

things, but just for being honest and

35:10

letting us know what's going on so we

35:11

can help you, uh, and the board to move

35:13

forward in any way we can. So, I

35:15

appreciate you. Thank you.

35:17

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

35:19

questions?

35:20

>> Thank you, President Hill. Thank you for

35:22

being here this evening, Miss Parsons.

35:24

Um, no questions. Just uh reading

35:27

through the general functions. I'd like

35:30

to see the board also up and running.

35:32

It's very important that our residents,

35:35

all of us in our community get educated

35:37

on some of the environmental dangers,

35:41

injustices,

35:43

um, sanitation, and whatever else that

35:47

we can learn from this department. So,

35:50

thank you for being here again.

35:52

>> Thank you. Thank you, council. I think

35:54

the board really does want to meet and

35:57

so we appreciate that you're making this

35:59

happen. Thank you.

36:01

>> Thank you.

36:02

>> Next, we have the Harrisburg

36:04

Redevelopment Authority.

36:40

Good evening, council president and

36:42

council members.

36:44

>> Good evening.

36:44

>> Nice to see you all.

36:46

My name is Brian Davis. I'm the

36:48

executive director for the Harrisburg

36:49

Redevelopment Authority. And uh with

36:52

with me tonight, uh my board members

36:54

from the authority could not make it.

36:56

But tonight, we'll also as a component

36:59

unit of the authority, you might

37:00

remember that the city of Harrisburg has

37:02

established a land bank. So they are

37:06

very similar in their operations and

37:09

their goals, objectives. uh there are a

37:12

couple of differences that uh you know

37:16

by us having a land bank it adds value

37:17

to what we can do with elimination of

37:19

blight and for urban renewal activities.

37:22

So I tried to we tried to give you on

37:26

the verse first first page of this

37:27

outline the the key questions that were

37:29

asked of us. At the top talks about the

37:33

redevelopment authority and the bottom

37:34

half is the land bank. Excuse my voice.

37:37

I'm getting over a cold so sorry about

37:40

that. And

37:43

for both of them uh I think it's

37:46

important to keep in mind that neither

37:48

one is considered a municipal authority

37:50

in the commonwealth.

37:52

So the redevelopment authority itself is

37:55

considered an an agency of the

37:56

commonwealth and then the land bank is a

37:59

public body and body corporate politic

38:02

which is just slightly different from

38:04

municipal authorities. So that's you

38:06

know a little legal detail but I like to

38:08

point that out. Now, for the

38:10

redevelopment authority, as far as our

38:12

board membership is concerned, we have

38:15

five slots and we currently have three

38:18

that are filled and two that are vacant.

38:20

We do have staggered

38:22

services. It's a five-year term and

38:25

they're all staggered. And the second

38:27

page of this, which you may have already

38:28

seen, has an outline of what the current

38:31

members who they are and their terms and

38:34

then the vacancies that we have that

38:35

need to be filled. And on that second

38:38

page at the bottom, we also show that

38:41

the the board of directors of the

38:44

redevelopment authority serve as the

38:46

core board members for the land bank.

38:49

And then we have two additional land

38:51

bank appointees from the mayor. So to

38:54

summarize, all five members of the

38:56

redevelopment authority are appointees

38:58

by city council.

39:01

All those members are also members of

39:03

the seven member land bank which adds

39:05

two appointees from the mayor's office.

39:08

Okay.

39:10

So, and I h you know you've we I've been

39:15

here before and shared a few things

39:17

about the projects that we've done. Uh a

39:20

lot of our activities are driven and

39:22

conducted under the you know

39:24

collaboration carrying and cooperation

39:27

and carrying out really the urban

39:29

renewal plans of the city of Harrisburg

39:32

and primarily for the elimination of

39:34

blight in acquiring and disposing of

39:36

properties that are blighting our

39:37

neighborhoods and uh you know

39:40

contributing to urban decay,

39:42

contributing to crime. But our goal is

39:44

for neighborhood stabilization. So both

39:47

the land bank and the redevelopment

39:49

authority uh that's their core function

39:53

as far as reporting goes on a technical

39:56

level both are to report to the

39:58

department uh Pennsylvania department of

40:00

community economic development as a

40:02

practical matter the activities that we

40:05

are engaged in

40:08

uh they will go primarily principally

40:11

it's going through the approval process

40:14

say the planning commission zoning

40:16

hearing ing board. When we're talking

40:18

real estate as a practical matter, we'll

40:21

have a lot of different methods for

40:22

acquiring blighted properties. But once

40:25

we get investors in or private sector

40:28

people to purchase the properties, they

40:31

of course have to go through the whole

40:33

process for approvals for whatever is

40:34

being built, whether it's affordable

40:36

housing or whether it's mixed use or

40:39

whether it's a a new park.

40:42

So uh those are uh you know high level

40:47

just kind of uh explanation of the two

40:49

organizations you can see how they're

40:51

very much related in their activities

40:53

their go core functions qualifications

40:56

are differ slightly I thought that I

40:58

would for the land bank just uh give the

41:01

full language that's in the city

41:02

ordinance as far as you know the

41:04

qualifications for members of the land

41:06

bank for the redevelopment authority

41:08

board it's straightforward they're all

41:10

appointed by council

41:12

All five members are appointed by

41:13

council and I must be one of two things.

41:16

I must be a resident of the city or my

41:19

business must be in the city proper.

41:21

That's for five redevelopment authority

41:23

board members. A little bit more

41:24

detailed for the qualifications

41:27

uh of the land bank. However, that tends

41:30

to be a default setting for the two

41:32

mayoral appointees. And you know, just

41:35

as another practical matter, and if

41:38

we're going to talk about

41:41

uh best candidates

41:44

for both of these boards, it's really

41:46

helpful if they have some experience in

41:49

real estate,

41:51

um affordable housing development,

41:55

um understanding,

41:57

you know, the process that developers

42:00

must go through for for local government

42:02

approvals.

42:04

Um, we've also had occasionally uh

42:08

attorneys on the board that had

42:10

experience in real estate.

42:14

So that really helps us to navigate

42:18

the specific complexities of that

42:21

industry and of dealing with blight and

42:24

the legal uh you know the legal context

42:28

that not just the acquisition but also

42:30

the disposition has to has to take place

42:32

in.

42:33

And uh I'll also wanted to point out

42:36

just like three good examples of of you

42:38

know things that we're working on so you

42:40

have a sense for that. The first one is

42:42

what we call quality of life. We along

42:45

with the land bank both the land bank

42:47

and the redevelopment authority have

42:48

assembled some vacant lots on south 15th

42:50

street and satara street where uh with

42:53

the part with the park parks partnership

42:56

team and the fundraising that they've

42:58

done are designing a new pocket park a

43:01

small park for the neighborhood. So

43:04

that's been under works for some time,

43:05

but that's an example where we actively

43:08

looked for land that was available on

43:10

the Dolphin County repository list that

43:13

would fit the needs of the community in

43:15

a direct response to a community request

43:17

for additional park space in that area.

43:22

So that's that's an example of a parks.

43:25

Another example is um Governor Square is

43:31

actually

43:32

an example of where in 2003

43:36

we were a part of assembling that land

43:38

and HUD originally would not just give

43:41

the land to a developer. It had to come

43:42

to the redevelopment authority first

43:45

along with uh grant funds that came from

43:48

HUD. Now we're in the throws of it

43:52

coming out the other end of the owner

43:54

after all those years allowing it just

43:55

to fall into disrepair and going into

43:57

bankruptcy. And now we're in that mix as

44:01

well because of that grant money that

44:03

came into the project. So, one of our uh

44:06

you know, one of the things that we're

44:09

um involved with and will stay actively

44:13

at the table on is how that gets

44:15

resolved and repurposed to be renewed

44:19

with another qualified buyer or

44:22

developer

44:24

and especially in the sense that I know

44:25

right now the receiver the front end is

44:28

heavy on assessing all the existing

44:29

conditions and what needs to be repaired

44:31

and making sure the families are safe

44:33

that are where that's not so much our

44:35

role. Our role is that uh parallel track

44:38

that looks at okay once it's stabilized

44:41

then how do we get the whole thing

44:43

redeveloped and back completely on the

44:46

market and that's when we'll be at the

44:47

table along with HUD and along with

44:49

PHFA.

44:51

The last example I'll give is

44:54

uh it can be just as small as us

44:56

acquiring some land for our our partner

44:58

nonprofits like Tri County Housing or

45:00

for Habitat for Humanity. Over the

45:02

years, we've acquired, you know,

45:04

properties for either each of them. And

45:07

the land bank has done that twice for

45:09

Tri County Housing and getting land so

45:11

they could build new houses on Sutara

45:12

Street and the redevelopment authority.

45:15

We recently had Tri County Housing start

45:18

construction on North Fourth Street,

45:20

2100 block with five new houses there.

45:23

So, those are like three really good I

45:25

thought nut, you know, in a nutshell

45:27

examples of what our activities

45:30

embrace. Um, I would like to mention

45:32

that Jackie Parker is here as a member

45:34

of the land bank and I thought maybe

45:36

she'd like to say a few words about the

45:38

land bank.

45:39

>> Sure, that's fine.

45:41

>> Good evening.

45:42

>> Good evening, council.

45:43

>> It's been a while since I've sat on this

45:45

side. Um, I worked for the city of

45:47

Harrisburg from 2014 to 2019. Um, and I

45:51

think that, um, as as Brian was saying,

45:54

you know, we did, um, a lot of different

45:56

things, but this creating the land bank

45:58

in 2014, I think was a significant step

46:00

for the redevelopment authority for

46:02

community and economic development for

46:04

the city of Harrisburg. We did have to

46:06

go um to the county for approval and

46:09

also for the the school district because

46:12

we do have the opportunity to if we do

46:14

some big developments, we can share in

46:16

the tax um, income as it goes back on

46:19

the on the tax roles. Um I think Brian

46:22

mentioned most of the things that we did

46:24

back in the back in those days, but one

46:26

of the things that I I was happy to do

46:28

was and right at the beginning when we

46:30

created the land bank was to help with

46:32

the sink holes that were down on 14th

46:34

Street. Um and we were able to help with

46:36

the whole assembly because the land bank

46:39

was in place and we were able to take

46:40

some of those parcels off the tax roles

46:42

before we had outsiders that were going

46:44

to come in and take them. And I think

46:46

that is really one one of the biggest

46:48

benefits of having a land bank is

46:50

working with the county and looking at

46:52

um you know the tax um lists as they

46:55

come in and and and you know preempting

46:59

any outsiders from taking some important

47:01

properties that we might be interested

47:04

in for assembly. And um again the

47:07

legislation was created in 20 for the

47:10

state was created in 2012 and it really

47:12

is very permissive in that it allows a

47:14

community like the city of Harrisburg to

47:17

um work with redevelopment authority

47:19

work with the city's mission with their

47:22

vision and and to be able to kind of

47:24

maneuver and take some of these

47:26

properties that are so important for

47:27

accumulation for larger projects. So I

47:30

think the 14th Street, the sinkholes was

47:32

it was really great that we had that in

47:34

place at that time. Um and I think Brian

47:36

did mention about HDC. We helped them

47:39

assemble for those um for the properties

47:41

that they wanted to to do on SWAR. Um

47:43

and also in Midtown we acquired some

47:46

properties to assemble again for

47:48

redevelopment.

47:49

So

47:52

>> thank you.

47:55

Uh I don't have any immediate questions.

47:59

Um, I'm going to defer to our building

48:02

and housing committee chair,

48:05

Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

48:07

questions?

48:08

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

48:10

Thank you for being here this evening.

48:13

You mentioned HDC, Harrisburg

48:16

>> Housing,

48:16

>> Housing Development Corporation.

48:18

>> Thank you for that because I was unaware

48:21

of what that term.

48:22

>> Um, I don't have any other questions

48:24

right now. Thank you.

48:27

Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

48:29

questions?

48:30

>> Thank you all. Thank you for being here

48:32

tonight. Uh, just a couple couple of

48:34

questions. Uh, as far as the H owned

48:36

properties, are there is there a public

48:38

list that people can look at to see what

48:40

properties are owned by HA?

48:41

>> We have a public list that we can give

48:43

on request. It's it's, you know, it's

48:47

it's not posted per se on ongoing, but

48:51

it is something that's available upon

48:52

request. Yes.

48:53

>> Okay. Um, I'd like to request it. Sure.

48:55

um it it be given to the council city

48:58

council clerk so that it can be posted

48:59

on the city council's website. I think

49:01

it's important for the public just to be

49:02

aware uh so that if someone wants to

49:04

work with HR they can you know reach

49:08

out. Um that's the second question. How

49:10

would someone work with you or reach out

49:11

if they were looking to do a partnership

49:13

with HA?

49:14

>> We receive quite a few cold calls and

49:16

also calls from people who are in the

49:18

industry routinely. So, and this

49:21

whenever they they can call, they can

49:24

email, they can come to our monthly

49:26

meetings that are public. Um, and then

49:29

we'll really work hard with them to

49:33

understand what their needs are. Um, I

49:37

frequently find that, uh, you know, we

49:41

have a vision of what we'd like to do or

49:43

a service that like we'd like to

49:45

provide, but we don't often have an idea

49:48

what that means as far as facility size,

49:51

location, um, off street parking, just

49:54

the details that have to do with the

49:56

real estate side. So I, you know, we'll

49:58

we'll spend as much time as someone

50:00

might need as far as working through

50:02

that and then letting them know not only

50:04

what our resources are because I have a

50:06

short list of everything that's

50:07

available today. So that might be like

50:10

80 80 or 90 parcels, okay? But so I'll

50:14

share that this is what we have today.

50:16

>> But we'll also point out other resources

50:17

that are available from the county's

50:20

perspective. They of course have the

50:21

repository list, but they also have

50:23

their twice a year tax sales. So we'll

50:26

also share that information and then

50:28

we'll also walk walk anybody through the

50:31

process of you know for for us to sell

50:34

property we have to get board approval

50:36

of course. So there's a process there

50:38

that you know that's two-page process a

50:41

two-step process that we share we walk

50:43

people through with that as well. So,

50:45

uh, that's how it happens. And, you

50:48

know, as they're preparing their their

50:50

package or their proposal for it for,

50:53

uh, to purchase one of our properties,

50:55

we'll even work with them on each of

50:57

those different components, you know,

50:59

and it's it's just for the sake of so

51:02

everybody knows, the first step is a

51:04

preliminary step where we look at is it

51:06

preliminarily feasible. So, we're just

51:09

looking at your preliminary financing

51:10

plan, preliminary sketches, does this

51:13

make sense financially and does it make

51:14

sense from a zoning and planning

51:17

commission standpoint. A lot of projects

51:19

do meet that threshold, then we'll take

51:21

that then I'll go to my board. will get

51:23

a a a resolution that will put make them

51:27

a potential developer, take it off the

51:29

market temporarily, but doesn't

51:30

authorize a transfer of the deed, but

51:32

that gives them time to finalize all of

51:34

their financing, get all of their plans,

51:36

specifications done, line up any

51:40

partnerships that they might need. Say

51:41

it's a affordable housing project, they

51:44

will have to have uh you know, property

51:46

management company, they'll have to have

51:47

PHFA approved, all those things. So we

51:50

give them that am additional amount of

51:51

time just to get that all all in line.

51:54

Depending on the complexity of it, it

51:55

may take several years for someone to

51:57

finalize it because JMBB Gardens is a

52:00

good example on North Sixth Street. That

52:01

took over two years for the financing

52:03

get together. There have been other

52:05

affordable projects that take three or

52:07

four years until they can get the

52:08

financing. But I'm sorry for that

52:10

long-winded explanation, but it is um

52:13

it's it's something that we do pretty

52:15

much every day.

52:16

>> Okay. Um it wasn't long-winded. Details

52:18

are important. So, I appreciate you

52:19

taking the time to uh walk us through

52:21

it. Um, you you said about how how

52:23

people reach out to you generally. Where

52:26

would someone find the contact

52:27

information? Like, is it a website?

52:29

Like, if I don't have your phone number,

52:30

how would I reach out to you? Or if I

52:31

don't have your email address, how do I

52:33

find it?

52:33

>> It it's quick. Um, it we do have a

52:36

website.

52:36

>> Okay.

52:37

>> And uh that's how many people find us uh

52:40

just by googling and they find our

52:41

information.

52:42

>> For the longest time, we were also

52:44

provided the support coalition on

52:47

homelessness. So our information is also

52:48

at HUD. So also take some calls from

52:51

people from out of state that just see

52:53

our our information on HUD's website. So

52:56

>> Okay. Thank you very much. I don't have

52:59

any further questions at this time.

53:01

>> Thank you. Uh Councilwoman Ross, any

53:04

questions?

53:12

>> Okay. Councilman Rodriguez. I'm sorry. I

53:15

did I could it was not um letting me

53:18

unmute myself. I'm so sorry.

53:20

>> It's okay.

53:21

>> Um uh um good evening. Thank you both

53:24

for being here today to explain more to

53:26

us about H. I think it's such a

53:29

important part of our city. Um

53:32

especially since um we do have an issue

53:34

with blight. Um we do have an issue with

53:38

um rebuilding and using the blight that

53:41

we have in a way where we can rebuild

53:43

our community. I think that's really

53:45

important. Um, thank you also, uh, Vice

53:48

President Green for asking for a list. I

53:50

know we asked that, I think last time to

53:52

have it posted, um, just so the

53:54

community and residents can see what

53:57

properties are on the list. Um, so, um,

54:00

they could easily say, okay, I would

54:03

like to, you know, redevelop that that

54:05

piece of, um, land or that, um, blighted

54:08

area. So, um, yeah, I would love to see

54:11

a list be online. I know that um I tried

54:15

to um also get a parcel of land to build

54:19

my own house in the city. Um so what I

54:21

would just say to that was very

54:23

difficult process and I think um there

54:27

should be different qualifications for a

54:29

resident who's just trying to build a

54:30

house and a developer who's trying to

54:32

develop land. I don't think they should

54:34

have the same requirements and the same

54:37

process to go through. Um the process

54:40

was very lengthy. It was very hard to

54:42

even find an architect to come into the

54:44

city because of all of the um ordinances

54:48

we have when it comes to building that

54:50

also need to be updated. So I would say

54:53

it was not an easy process and I think

54:55

we want to promote our residents to want

54:57

to build houses in the city. Um I think

54:59

that will also help with um the parcels

55:02

we have that are not being used and also

55:04

the blighted land that we have. So um I

55:08

would just you know thank you so much

55:09

for coming in. Like I said, it's a very

55:11

important board, but I do I would like

55:14

to see some, if it's possible, um

55:17

different qualifications for residents

55:19

who want to simply build their own house

55:21

and um developers who are developing

55:24

large large parcels of land. So, um that

55:28

I didn't have any questions. I just

55:30

wanted to see if that was possible. And

55:33

um that was it for me.

55:37

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

55:39

questions?

55:41

>> Thank you, Madam President, and of

55:42

course, thank you both for joining us

55:44

this evening. Um, just pretty much

55:46

echoing the same sentiments. It'd be

55:47

great to see a repository of what the uh

55:51

H does have on hand. Um, just to have

55:54

that information for the public and, you

55:56

know, it's definitely great to hear

55:57

about the land bank. I definitely know

55:59

how that could be vital to the

56:01

development and growth of Harrisburg.

56:02

So, uh, just thank you and hopefully we

56:05

can get that list.

56:08

Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

56:10

questions?

56:11

>> Yes. Um, thank you both for coming.

56:14

Thank you both for your service. Um, you

56:17

probably be hearing that a lot tonight.

56:18

Uh, but one of the things I'm just want

56:21

to take a little deeper dive. I have a

56:23

couple questions and hopefully that you

56:25

can um answer not only for my own

56:27

edification, but for the public as well.

56:30

Um,

56:32

does the H have a budget?

56:36

We do have an annual budget every year.

56:39

Um it's it's about $430,000

56:43

a year and that covers staff and uh

56:47

staff cost, incidental cost and legal

56:49

cost that we have for a year.

56:51

>> Okay. So, um I mean far as like this is

56:53

how I I'm just going to give you my how

56:55

I envision HA.

56:58

um when we have a land bank and we have

57:01

these uh parcels that are out here and

57:03

you know one of the things that you guys

57:06

um functions are is revitalizing uh the

57:09

city. So with that and we know we need

57:13

downtown revitalized. We need Allison

57:15

Hill. We need the city itself

57:18

revitalized and just outside of knocking

57:21

down p properties to remove blight. are

57:23

we packaging

57:25

these pro these parcels and these

57:27

properties to to to see developers come

57:30

in? Um, and that's why I'm looking at a

57:33

budget to see if we if if it's grass and

57:35

all of these different things that we

57:36

have to maintain and package something

57:39

for like a

57:41

a mall, somebody to come in and say,

57:43

"Hey, we here's what we packaged up

57:45

together to look at this." Are we are we

57:47

doing

57:49

>> Yeah, I I'm glad you raised that

57:50

question because it speaks to the nature

57:53

of funding for uh our real estate

57:56

transactions, the real estate activities

57:59

we have. In order for us to acquire

58:01

properties, we need to have the money.

58:03

So, we need to identify funds. It may be

58:06

funds that the city sets aside from its

58:08

CDBG home, from its CDBG funds, which

58:11

has happened in the past. We may be able

58:14

to use funds from the Commonwealth

58:16

applying for funds. It's a little bit

58:18

more difficult to have acquisition funds

58:19

and demolition funds, but we have to do

58:22

the oldfashioned thing and apply for

58:23

funds from the Commonwealth or from the

58:25

federal government to do this work. a

58:27

good example that we're going through

58:29

right now. It might seem

58:33

um

58:35

it it is a true urban renewal activity

58:39

with the Paxton Creek Regionalization

58:42

where we own very little of the land

58:45

around the creek as the redevelopment

58:47

authority does. However, we've assembled

58:50

a partnership and we've received grant

58:52

funds to begin the work of environmental

58:56

assessment um acquisition, some

58:59

acquisition as well as engineering work

59:02

that's needed for um for taking that

59:05

creek, that channel of the Paxton Creek

59:07

that was built in 1910 and it's

59:09

collapsing in different places that is

59:11

so obsolete and from the 1972 flood just

59:16

which devastated all of Pax, all of

59:19

Cameron Street, right? It never really

59:20

recovered. And because of that flooding,

59:24

uh, the flooding condition and all of

59:27

the flood maps that have existed ever

59:28

since, the city of Harrisburg as well as

59:31

the redevelopment authority as well as

59:33

uh, Capitol Region Water from the

59:35

standpoint of their intercept needing to

59:37

be replaced to repair that long-term

59:39

planning for flood mitigation and also

59:42

to mitigate uh, contaminants in the

59:44

Sesana River. We've also partnered with

59:47

the city engineers office in this very

59:50

complex uh plan to remove that channel

59:56

and renaturalize the creek creating a

59:59

new green belt through there which will

1:00:02

simultaneously do it in such a manner

1:00:04

that it will lower the flood stage and

1:00:08

raise about 200 parcels along the Paxton

1:00:10

Creek out of the floodway and then

1:00:13

available again for new development.

1:00:15

velment which is really a huge economic

1:00:19

development project in the city. But I

1:00:21

give that as an eth because the way we

1:00:23

pay for that is through grants through

1:00:26

uh we've gotten awarded uh funding from

1:00:29

the commonwealth redevelopment

1:00:30

assistance capital program funds. We

1:00:32

received EPA funds. We've also received

1:00:35

FEMA funds which we're waiting for that

1:00:37

contract to be signed because that's

1:00:39

going to give us it builds on work that

1:00:41

PENDOT did many years ago. They really

1:00:44

set the stage in paying for so much of

1:00:47

the engineering work preliminarily that

1:00:50

we've been able to build on that so that

1:00:52

now we're at the point where this next

1:00:54

funding trunch that we get we can

1:00:57

actually start to see what the final

1:00:59

design will look like. So it's a really

1:01:02

good question. I mean that on a smaller

1:01:05

scale, you know, that happens with other

1:01:07

projects like at Midtown and

1:01:09

Marketplace. We bundled those. We had to

1:01:10

assemble in we had enough contiguous

1:01:13

property that we could put out on an RFP

1:01:15

and find a developer that would invest

1:01:17

in the city.

1:01:17

>> And I was and I appreciate that

1:01:19

explanation because I was uh again

1:01:21

that's how I saw this functioning and

1:01:24

I'm glad you were able to and not only

1:01:26

myself just again for for for the public

1:01:28

stance. Um but uh one of the other

1:01:31

things is I hope again um I know you

1:01:33

were here in 24

1:01:36

when we uh introduced uh Naka. Um that's

1:01:39

something um I think that we're still

1:01:41

looking at um being able to offer our uh

1:01:44

residents and some of those blighted

1:01:46

homes uh those houses for $1. Um I think

1:01:49

you really appreciated that plan. Um,

1:01:52

so, uh, but the other thing I would ask

1:01:55

is, um, there's two more questions and I

1:01:58

don't want to make this lengthy, but I

1:02:00

really have to ask these questions. Um,

1:02:02

when is the when is the last time and on

1:02:04

I see one of your, um, organization's

1:02:07

um, overview uh, public uh, meetings.

1:02:10

When was the last time one of those

1:02:12

held? Uh we have monthly meetings for

1:02:16

both land bank and for the redevelopment

1:02:17

authority on the third Tuesday of each

1:02:19

month.

1:02:20

>> We we didn't have a meeting last month

1:02:22

because we didn't have any actionable

1:02:24

items.

1:02:24

>> Okay.

1:02:25

>> But we will have we had one the month

1:02:26

before.

1:02:27

>> They are

1:02:28

>> they are advertised.

1:02:29

>> Yep. They are they are

1:02:30

>> that was that was

1:02:31

>> they are advertised.

1:02:32

>> That was my next question. So again,

1:02:34

this is this is all for the public

1:02:36

because there are a lot of people and

1:02:37

I'm sure my colleagues get these

1:02:39

questions as well um that people are

1:02:41

looking to develop here and and there

1:02:43

seems like you know there's a wall that

1:02:46

they have to climb and so I'm just

1:02:48

hoping that this information can be u

1:02:50

put out not just on on the website. I

1:02:52

mean we we we all say that go to the

1:02:55

city's website and you can find but

1:02:57

sometimes you know um a lot of people

1:02:59

don't that's not the only source. So,

1:03:03

uh, that I think that we can get this

1:03:05

information out for the public to be

1:03:07

clearly aware of what's happening and

1:03:08

what's available. Um, because the goal

1:03:11

is again to get some of those

1:03:12

dilapitated properties back on the tax

1:03:15

road. Which brings me to my next

1:03:17

question. Um, I see that you mentioned

1:03:20

um that when you acquire uh some of this

1:03:22

property uh for nonprofits, and I don't

1:03:26

want to take away from nonprofits, but I

1:03:28

think that's one of the big issues that

1:03:30

we're having in our city. um with some

1:03:32

of the state buildings that are non-t

1:03:34

taxable and the nonprofit uh sector that

1:03:37

is nonprofitable. So um

1:03:41

that doesn't really help us on on on the

1:03:43

tax side of things. Go ahead. It looks

1:03:46

like you're you're ready to jump in.

1:03:48

Yeah, I I'll that's a very good question

1:03:52

because uh the the redevelopment

1:03:54

authority has a long-standing practice

1:03:57

that when we when we transfer a deed

1:03:59

from us to anybody else regardless of

1:04:02

their tax status, it remains taxable in

1:04:05

perpetuity.

1:04:07

Now, to more specific, your uh the

1:04:10

example of uh the land that we've

1:04:13

acquired, which hasn't been a lot for

1:04:14

the nonprofits to build on, those then

1:04:17

are houses that are sold to residents of

1:04:19

the city of Harrisburg, income eligible

1:04:21

residents, and they're taxable. Okay?

1:04:23

>> Right now, they'll benefit from the

1:04:24

10-year tax abatement that's in place

1:04:26

right now. Right? in that sense. I'm

1:04:30

just saying it was an incentive for

1:04:31

first-time home buyers or for low-income

1:04:33

families that that's very helpful.

1:04:36

>> So, when you're doing that, are you

1:04:37

working with the um fair housing

1:04:40

council?

1:04:40

>> It can be fair housing council. It can

1:04:42

be community action commission. It can

1:04:45

be Tri County now has their own housing

1:04:47

counseling arm as well. So, but it does

1:04:51

um I've seen all of them involved in

1:04:53

that different housing projects that

1:04:54

we've been a part of over the years.

1:04:56

Yeah.

1:04:57

>> Okay. there.

1:04:57

>> Um yeah, thank you for for um letting me

1:05:00

and again um the public know because

1:05:02

that's one of the things I think um

1:05:05

a lot of cities are having now,

1:05:07

especially with downtown and all of

1:05:09

these buildings getting reassessed.

1:05:10

There's millions of dollars just going

1:05:12

down the drain. Um and again, I think

1:05:14

the goal here as a city function that I

1:05:16

would love to see is to take a lot of

1:05:18

the strain off of of the homeowners

1:05:21

here. And um if our schools are failing

1:05:23

and we don't have a bunch of home, this

1:05:25

is why it's important to have you don't

1:05:26

understand this, right? This is why it's

1:05:28

important to have homeowners and get

1:05:29

people back into these homes to get it

1:05:31

back on the tax road that way. Um if if

1:05:34

our schools don't have money and they're

1:05:35

looking for uh the tax dollars to be

1:05:38

that source, we I think there's some

1:05:40

things readjustments that we have to do

1:05:42

as a city. Go ahead. You've touched on

1:05:44

three important points in that number

1:05:47

one is when we do neighborhood

1:05:49

stabilization,

1:05:51

we accomplish a great deal of that

1:05:52

through home ownership. Number one.

1:05:54

Number two, when we repurpose existing

1:05:57

buildings that are now defunct or not

1:05:59

being used for where their original

1:06:00

purposes, then we're also helping to

1:06:03

stabilize and improve the tax base.

1:06:05

Right. And then number three, which you

1:06:08

really didn't mention, but I I'd like to

1:06:10

add to that, is just that all of our

1:06:13

success we accomplish through

1:06:15

partnerships. We have not been able to

1:06:18

accomplish any successful story at all

1:06:21

without partnerships. Good.

1:06:22

>> So that's one of the first things that

1:06:24

people will read. It's it's a boring

1:06:27

read to visit our website, but that's

1:06:28

one of the first things you'll see is

1:06:30

that our success is because of our

1:06:32

partnerships and it and it because we're

1:06:34

a separate entity from the city, we're

1:06:36

able to point to well here if it's

1:06:38

affordable housing, here are the

1:06:40

resources that the city has. Home funds,

1:06:43

CDBG funds, um and it's not the city,

1:06:46

then we also have PHFA at the state

1:06:47

level and the federal level. We know

1:06:49

what sources there are to do just about

1:06:52

every project that there is. And so in a

1:06:55

sense that we don't host these, you

1:06:57

know, resources, but that we collaborate

1:07:00

so those partnerships actually deliver

1:07:02

for the city.

1:07:04

>> I like to point out to the homes that

1:07:06

are on SWAT with um HDC, the Housing

1:07:09

Development Corporation over the years,

1:07:10

they have been very strong partners with

1:07:12

us and they do manage to put those

1:07:15

funding pieces together, whether it is

1:07:16

PHFA or a little bit of from the city.

1:07:19

um and and they they know how to get

1:07:21

those resources and we help with those

1:07:23

kinds of things by having the land and

1:07:26

so they have come in I think they've

1:07:27

done five houses along there and they're

1:07:29

all for home ownership and then and and

1:07:31

as Brian said first-time home buyers so

1:07:33

>> thank you I really appreciate the

1:07:35

explanation um last thing I'll say is

1:07:38

that um you know I appreciate um go

1:07:41

after those grants keep going after them

1:07:43

right um and you mentioned something

1:07:45

about the CDBG funding um as of recent

1:07:48

you know Um, I see administration as

1:07:51

looking to kind of go away from the

1:07:52

nonprofit sector. I'm not going to say

1:07:54

it's in in its entirety, but um, if you

1:07:57

go back to the Reed era, he used a lot

1:07:59

of that CDBG money to develop things.

1:08:01

So, I think, um, having that, that's a

1:08:03

worthy conversation to make sure there's

1:08:05

some funds to help package some of these

1:08:07

uh, the land bank and parcels that we

1:08:10

have. So, developers and we have to give

1:08:13

them some type of incentive. It's good

1:08:14

for businesses. I mean developers, but

1:08:16

you know that's a whole another thing.

1:08:18

But uh thank you. Um that's all I have.

1:08:21

Um and I appreciate you guys doing what

1:08:22

you do. Thank you.

1:08:26

>> Thank you. Thank you both for being here

1:08:28

this evening and for sharing.

1:08:34

>> Next we have the Historic Architectural

1:08:37

Review Board, also known as HARB.

1:09:01

Good evening. I'm Trina Gribble. I

1:09:04

currently sit as the chair of the

1:09:06

Historic Architectural Review Board or

1:09:09

HARB. Um

1:09:14

so to go through some of your questions

1:09:17

um that were given to us in preparation.

1:09:21

Um the general function I just wanted to

1:09:24

mention um we are a an advisory board

1:09:30

and we have public meetings once a month

1:09:32

in these chambers

1:09:34

and uh sometimes we we

1:09:39

uh take an off month in December if we

1:09:40

don't have any business but um yes it's

1:09:43

a monthly meeting and our

1:09:45

recommendations that are decided in

1:09:48

those meetings then go to council for

1:09:50

ratification.

1:09:52

Uh currently the HARB is a group of

1:09:55

seven city residents or professionals

1:09:57

who volunteer.

1:09:59

Uh they are appointed um I believe by

1:10:02

the mayor. You can correct me on that

1:10:03

one. Um currently we have five members

1:10:08

on the board and we have two vacancies.

1:10:13

The terms are I believe three well they

1:10:16

are three years and I say I believe

1:10:18

because we've lost track. So because so

1:10:20

many of us have been on the board for

1:10:22

many many years. Um so I we haven't been

1:10:27

very deadfast in keeping track of when

1:10:30

they expire and when they renew. Uh we

1:10:34

do have one new member this year. Um the

1:10:37

the terms are in theory staggered. Um

1:10:41

the qualifications for appointment, we

1:10:43

have one position that is to be held by

1:10:45

an architect.

1:10:47

Uh we have one position that is a real

1:10:49

estate agent and the other is the city

1:10:52

code official sits on our board.

1:10:54

Um I believe those three professional

1:10:58

positions do not have to live in the

1:10:59

city but the other um four positions are

1:11:04

residents of the of the historic

1:11:06

districts.

1:11:09

So um the harb has purview over six

1:11:14

municipal historic districts.

1:11:17

They are Allison Hill, Box Ridge,

1:11:21

Harrisburg, Shyoke, Midtown, and Old

1:11:24

Uptown.

1:11:26

And these were en enacted uh in response

1:11:30

to the devastation of the hurricane

1:11:32

Agnes in 1972

1:11:35

um as a way to

1:11:38

revitalize the city and also to preserve

1:11:42

our assets.

1:11:50

The HARB is required to follow um

1:11:54

to review the following kinds of

1:11:56

projects, alterations that are visible

1:11:58

from the public right of way within

1:12:00

these districts. Uh we also have purview

1:12:04

over new construction.

1:12:06

Uh s simple things such as awnings,

1:12:08

fences, and signs. We also have purview

1:12:11

over demolition of part or all of a

1:12:14

building

1:12:16

and it's whether it's a commercial,

1:12:19

residential or public property.

1:12:23

The application review um is part of the

1:12:27

building permit process. So applicants

1:12:31

will submit uh drawings, photographs,

1:12:34

description of the work. Um, and those

1:12:37

applications are due the first of each

1:12:39

month, first Friday of each month, and

1:12:41

then the board meets, like I said,

1:12:43

monthly. That would be the first Monday

1:12:45

of every month, and the applicant

1:12:47

representative must attend.

1:12:51

Um, city staff may uh often

1:12:54

administratively approve applications

1:12:56

involving inind repair and that is

1:12:59

something that is granted through uh

1:13:02

discussion with the board.

1:13:05

Then those recommendations, like I said,

1:13:06

go to the city council.

1:13:10

Um, some similar CA or common cases that

1:13:14

we look at are

1:13:16

more than not are windows and doors,

1:13:18

awnings, weather control device,

1:13:21

vestibials, um, fences, signage,

1:13:24

additions, and renovations.

1:13:27

And how do we go about determining his

1:13:30

what's

1:13:32

warranted in a historic district? uh we

1:13:34

use the secretary of interior standards

1:13:37

as the guideline as to what is

1:13:41

appropriate or inappropriate again to

1:13:43

preserve the assets and the value of

1:13:45

these historic properties.

1:13:48

Um Harb has also in in my tenure has uh

1:13:54

renewed the guidelines. There's a design

1:13:56

guidelines book booklet which I have

1:14:00

here and which can be found on the

1:14:03

links through um the website which helps

1:14:07

to guide the residents

1:14:10

as to what's appropriate and what's uh

1:14:13

inappropriate and and also why is it

1:14:16

important to do it in a certain way.

1:14:24

Um typical

1:14:27

considerations are also regarding

1:14:30

material, the style and the streetscape.

1:14:32

And regarding materials, whether you're

1:14:35

replacing wood with some composite

1:14:37

material or with wood, um we're right

1:14:40

now um

1:14:43

Erica is new to the staff and she's been

1:14:45

working on an an addendum to the

1:14:50

guidelines which will further elaborate

1:14:52

on what those types of materials can be

1:14:56

because think we have to keep up with

1:14:58

the changing technologies of materials

1:15:01

and be able So then further in inform

1:15:04

the public with our guidelines um what

1:15:07

those materials can be.

1:15:10

So we see our purpose as safeguarding

1:15:12

the community structures, features and

1:15:14

streetscapes that make Harrisburg unique

1:15:18

um by saving the distinct character of

1:15:20

the city uh that will benefit the

1:15:22

community in many ways. uh it's cultural

1:15:26

benefits, there are social benefits,

1:15:28

there are even economic benefits that go

1:15:31

tie along with redevelopment.

1:15:33

Um and I think also I keep calling them

1:15:37

assets because once we

1:15:40

lose our historic connection um then it

1:15:43

becomes everywhere USA and we want our

1:15:46

own identity.

1:15:48

There's also environmental benefits to

1:15:50

historic preservation because those

1:15:53

those materials are already there. We

1:15:55

don't have to find new materials and put

1:16:00

more energy into construction.

1:16:06

So, um

1:16:08

again, uh that's pretty much the gist of

1:16:11

what HARB does. And um I had thought

1:16:15

wanted to give some thoughts on maybe

1:16:17

some improvements or modifications as

1:16:19

you go forward with the the harp.

1:16:23

Um, of course,

1:16:26

we want to fill the vacancies because

1:16:28

the more people we have at the table,

1:16:30

the better representation we have.

1:16:33

Again, we have six municipal districts

1:16:36

and we have seven members, three of

1:16:38

which are professionals. So, the more we

1:16:40

can represent each of those historic

1:16:42

districts, I think that's the better.

1:16:46

Um, also staffing. We've benefited from

1:16:49

a new staff member, a historic

1:16:52

preservation preservationist

1:16:54

um specialist, and she is able to

1:17:00

increase our abilities as a board and um

1:17:03

I would encourage continuing to to build

1:17:06

the staff uh because they can assist the

1:17:09

applicants as they go through the

1:17:10

process

1:17:12

and um monitor the projects within the

1:17:14

city that may not be coming to the

1:17:17

across their table. Um there

1:17:20

unfortunately there's lots of things

1:17:22

that happen

1:17:24

in the weekend hours and don't come

1:17:27

through hard. So we lose some of our

1:17:29

integrity in these districts.

1:17:33

Um, also there's been discussion in the

1:17:36

past and I think it's a it's an

1:17:38

incentive in the future to put an

1:17:40

inventory together of different

1:17:43

properties within in the these districts

1:17:46

and u document those assets.

1:17:50

Also, I think it's important to have

1:17:52

staff and HARB continue to educate the

1:17:55

community about the as the benefits of

1:17:58

historic preservation

1:18:00

using the members as resources

1:18:04

and also consideration of expanding the

1:18:07

historic districts to

1:18:10

capture more of the unique

1:18:15

uh unique qualities of Harrisburg and

1:18:17

some of those historic properties that

1:18:18

are not within in confines of the

1:18:20

districts.

1:18:25

Um just also some logistics I think um

1:18:30

and this is something we can bring up at

1:18:32

our our board board member board

1:18:34

meetings which we have um but I see

1:18:37

these nice uh screens up here. We do

1:18:40

hold our our meetings in these chambers

1:18:43

but we aren't use we're using a lot of

1:18:45

paper. We are historic architectural

1:18:47

review board, but we could use

1:18:49

technologies that are current um and not

1:18:52

require so much paper.

1:18:55

Yeah. Not not so much paper when the

1:18:57

applications are turned in. They could

1:19:00

be electronic and distributed

1:19:02

electronically to the board members. I

1:19:05

think that would be more efficient. And

1:19:07

also, I'd like to be able to show as we

1:19:10

discuss put everyone on the same page

1:19:13

literally. So, I think that would be a

1:19:16

benefit.

1:19:17

Um, and as I said, I think other other

1:19:21

things, uh, you asked about engaging the

1:19:23

public, like how do you how do you do

1:19:25

that? Um, I believe in our bylaws, it

1:19:28

talks about annual annual reporting to

1:19:32

council, and this is one of the first

1:19:35

moments we've had to actually have a

1:19:37

conversation about what HARB does. And I

1:19:40

see as an important conduit to share our

1:19:43

experiences and opportunities. And I

1:19:46

also see that it's important to connect

1:19:50

with these other boards as well. We

1:19:53

overlap with a lot of what the

1:19:54

redevelopment authorities trying to

1:19:56

achieve, what the planning commission,

1:19:58

the zoning boards are trying to achieve,

1:20:01

and even the environmental committee.

1:20:04

Um, forgot their name. um environmental

1:20:07

advisory council.

1:20:10

Um

1:20:15

and um so I think we would like to

1:20:18

continue those discussions and also

1:20:20

educate the public about the benefits,

1:20:23

the how-tos and what resources are

1:20:25

available to the public.

1:20:27

Um

1:20:29

and then lastly also beyond the walls of

1:20:32

the district and beyond the walls of

1:20:34

this the the borders of the city itself.

1:20:37

How can we entice people to come to

1:20:41

historic Harrisburg, the old city? So

1:20:45

you go to many many towns out and about

1:20:48

and you go to the core and along main

1:20:52

thorough affairs you see signs to say

1:20:54

old city Harrisburg or actually I just

1:20:58

went to Lan Lancaster and it does have

1:21:00

those directional signs and we want to

1:21:02

be proud of that history and draw

1:21:05

attention to it. So I guess that's what

1:21:08

I have if you have any questions.

1:21:12

>> Thank you so much. Thank you for your

1:21:13

recommendations. I appreciate those. Um,

1:21:16

how do you feel about QR codes? Do you

1:21:19

think that would be helpful?

1:21:22

>> I'm sure they can be. I'm not sure in

1:21:24

what way we would be using them.

1:21:26

>> Okay.

1:21:26

>> Um, but it's

1:21:28

>> it's to reference the meeting materials.

1:21:30

You mentioned a lot of paper in your

1:21:32

meeting packets. um if individuals

1:21:36

attending the meeting or if other board

1:21:38

members just scan hovers their phone

1:21:41

over the QR code, all of the

1:21:43

documentation for the meeting would pop

1:21:44

up.

1:21:45

>> That would be le catapulting us into

1:21:47

this technology.

1:21:50

>> You can take baby steps with it. You

1:21:51

could have you could still have some

1:21:54

hard copy packets, but

1:21:56

>> Right. And can you please remind me, was

1:21:58

it in 2021 that the HARB guidelines were

1:22:02

updated?

1:22:04

>> Uh, well, we had some public meetings in

1:22:07

2019.

1:22:09

>> Um, and when it was actually voted on, I

1:22:13

think was not too

1:22:14

>> far thereafter. I don't remember if it

1:22:17

was 2020.

1:22:18

>> I was trying to remember. I remember the

1:22:20

public meetings and I remember all of

1:22:22

the discussion around it. I thought um

1:22:25

that they were really helpful to

1:22:27

residents um particularly those that

1:22:30

were new to historic districts and they

1:22:33

didn't know um all of the necessities

1:22:36

there. I did want to clarify um so

1:22:42

our packet here notes that the harb

1:22:47

members are appointed by the mayor with

1:22:50

council consent. Um but on the website

1:22:54

it notes that the body is comprised of

1:22:57

seven mayors appointed members excuse me

1:22:59

appointed by city council. So, is that

1:23:07

I thought they were all mayoral

1:23:09

appointments, but I just wanted to

1:23:11

clarify since it reads differently

1:23:14

>> legal.

1:23:17

>> They're reading.

1:23:18

>> My experience, I was asked to join by

1:23:22

the mayor and then I came to council,

1:23:25

>> right, for approval. Yes,

1:23:26

>> that is what I went through.

1:23:29

>> That's what I thought. I just want to

1:23:30

make sure just so everybody

1:23:32

>> is a mayoral appointment.

1:23:33

>> Thank you. And there are currently at

1:23:37

least two vacancies.

1:23:38

>> Yes.

1:23:39

>> Okay.

1:23:40

>> And there is one coming down to council

1:23:42

for the next meeting for the

1:23:43

>> Oh, okay.

1:23:44

>> So that Jeffrey had recommended to the

1:23:45

mayor.

1:23:46

>> Great. So you'll have a new person soon.

1:23:49

Um let's see here. The terms are three

1:23:53

years and they are staggered.

1:23:55

Um,

1:23:57

and a number I guess of the current

1:23:59

board members

1:24:01

terms have expired. Does the mayor

1:24:03

intend to

1:24:06

>> So I'm not sure what the mayor's

1:24:08

intention is. Historically, not for all

1:24:10

boards, but for most boards, there's a

1:24:12

provision both in state law and local

1:24:14

that they continue to serve until until

1:24:18

>> uh they can leave, but the but but they

1:24:20

can stay. And so I don't know what the

1:24:21

mayor's term is. I think part of the

1:24:23

reason you're having this meeting is

1:24:25

sometimes it's very hard to get

1:24:26

volunteers

1:24:28

uh for new position, new people. So

1:24:30

rotating is hard on on the rules are

1:24:33

very ambitious for rotation and and the

1:24:36

volunteer list isn't long enough to do

1:24:37

it for almost any board. That's that's

1:24:39

the reality.

1:24:41

>> So

1:24:42

>> they also have to know about it. So I

1:24:44

think that was more so the reason why.

1:24:46

Right.

1:24:46

>> Yes. Yes, some of these boards.

1:24:47

>> I'm going to say this is probably my

1:24:49

seventh public meeting on boards and

1:24:51

commissions and why people should

1:24:52

volunteer.

1:24:53

>> So, it comes up again and again. The

1:24:55

council keeps trying. They keep trying

1:24:57

and

1:24:58

>> that's all we can do, right?

1:24:59

>> And so, you try to get people to

1:25:00

volunteer and be interested and uh and

1:25:03

we've been very fortunate with some very

1:25:05

good people on very many boards.

1:25:08

>> We have. So, I just wanted to review the

1:25:10

formal reports and advice provided. I

1:25:13

think you covered this, but I just

1:25:15

wanted to note recommendations on

1:25:16

certificates of appropriateness should

1:25:19

be submitted in writing to city council

1:25:21

recommending approval or denial of

1:25:23

applications.

1:25:25

An annual report submitted to the mayor

1:25:28

and city council summarizing

1:25:29

transactions, activities, and

1:25:31

preservation oversight. Guidance on

1:25:34

historic district boundaries. You may

1:25:36

advise city council and staff on the

1:25:39

limits of historic districts and

1:25:41

boundary adjustments, which you

1:25:43

mentioned expanding those. And then

1:25:45

demolition criteria and preservation

1:25:48

standards provide policy guidance and

1:25:51

recommendations on demolition requests

1:25:53

and preservation best practices.

1:25:57

I'm going to open the floor to my

1:25:58

colleagues who may have some questions

1:26:00

for you. I will start with our building

1:26:02

and housing committee chair,

1:26:04

Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

1:26:06

questions?

1:26:07

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

1:26:10

>> Evening.

1:26:11

>> Um Trina, Miss Trina.

1:26:13

>> Yes.

1:26:14

>> Um thank you for being here this

1:26:16

evening. I pretty much look at all of

1:26:19

the um cases that come through and I

1:26:24

actually go out in the to the community

1:26:27

and drive around and look at some of the

1:26:29

properties.

1:26:31

I don't if I have a dispute or I don't

1:26:35

agree with something, I will send you an

1:26:38

email or the secretary

1:26:41

um of the board. I don't know who that

1:26:44

is. I just look at the emails and then

1:26:46

respond.

1:26:48

>> Um but for the most part, I think the

1:26:51

board is very strict when it comes to

1:26:55

our um historic properties.

1:26:58

>> Um and for a good reason. Um, as you

1:27:00

said, we want to maintain the integrity

1:27:04

um, and also be an attraction, keep that

1:27:06

attraction in our city. Um,

1:27:11

one question.

1:27:13

When someone buys a a historic property,

1:27:17

does the board notify them about the uh

1:27:22

decisions uh or

1:27:25

notify them that they have to check with

1:27:27

the board before they make any revisions

1:27:30

to their property.

1:27:33

>> Right. So um the building application

1:27:36

goes uh to the city for review. So

1:27:39

that's for building permit and then that

1:27:41

would catch if it's in a historic

1:27:42

district and what the work is. So it's

1:27:44

if it's on the exterior facades, it's in

1:27:47

the purview of HARB. Um but when people

1:27:51

buy properties within the historic

1:27:53

districts, uh the real estate agents are

1:27:57

required to provide uh provide that

1:27:59

information that they are within a

1:28:01

historic district and there are certain

1:28:03

criteria.

1:28:05

>> I wondered about that and thank you for

1:28:07

clarifying um that the real estate

1:28:09

agents actually that's their job to do

1:28:11

that. Um okay, so for right now I don't

1:28:15

have any other questions. Thank you.

1:28:19

Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

1:28:21

questions?

1:28:22

>> Thank you, President Hill. I don't have

1:28:23

any questions for you, but thank you

1:28:25

very much for your service.

1:28:28

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

1:28:30

questions?

1:28:42

>> Okay, Councilman Rodriguez, any

1:28:45

questions?

1:28:47

Um, no, no questions for me and thank

1:28:49

you for joining us this evening.

1:28:51

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

1:28:53

questions?

1:28:54

>> Uh, yeah, I think it was pretty much

1:28:56

answered. Um, Councilwoman Davis uh is

1:29:00

asked about um how are we notifying um

1:29:02

the the the buyers of this of these

1:29:05

properties? Um because I've been through

1:29:07

a couple of them and some and this is

1:29:09

for the public because some of them are

1:29:10

young people that are looking to to buy

1:29:13

and and and and rehab a lot of these

1:29:15

homes. Um there was one in particular

1:29:17

incident where one has uh bought the

1:29:20

property in a historical area and

1:29:23

started he seen someone else do

1:29:25

something different than the historical

1:29:27

area pretty much allowed and then they

1:29:30

wanted to follow and start getting the

1:29:32

same material. Then they had to take all

1:29:34

of this stuff down uh before they could

1:29:37

even sell resell the home. So they took

1:29:39

a big loss. So, I'm really concerned

1:29:41

about making sure that this information

1:29:43

when it comes to I think that was a

1:29:45

great question. When someone purchases

1:29:47

the house, we should be able to send

1:29:48

something out from the city to let them

1:29:51

know you've just purchased a home in a

1:29:53

historical uh area and here's here's the

1:29:56

guidelines because um and I think they

1:29:58

probably would have done it the way

1:30:00

following the rules if they would have

1:30:01

known about it and it's maybe just

1:30:03

because they're young at it too. So

1:30:06

hopefully trying to just brick that gap

1:30:08

and making sure that we can get some of

1:30:09

that information out to any potential

1:30:12

buyers and anyone that actually

1:30:13

purchases. So um that's something that

1:30:16

um I think you answered, but if not, I

1:30:18

hopefully we can really work towards

1:30:20

something like that. And that's all I

1:30:21

have.

1:30:22

>> Sure. I would I would agree. The more

1:30:24

ways to capture and and inform um

1:30:27

potential buyers and people who are

1:30:30

buying properties, I think the better.

1:30:32

Um, but I believe the onus is on the

1:30:34

real estate agent at the moment, but to

1:30:37

capture it.

1:30:37

>> Well, some of them it could be the city

1:30:39

owns may some may have some of the the

1:30:41

parcels, right? And and and again, I

1:30:43

think so that would be on us to to send

1:30:45

that out or No,

1:30:46

>> there aren't too many properties that we

1:30:48

own that have a building on it.

1:30:50

>> Okay.

1:30:50

>> Right. That that's the reality. So, we

1:30:53

don't we those would be great because

1:30:54

it'd actually auction off for money.

1:30:59

>> All right. Thank you.

1:31:00

>> Thank you.

1:31:01

>> Thank you. I'm going to try one more

1:31:03

time. Councilwoman Ross, any questions?

1:31:07

Okay. Thank you. Thanks for being here

1:31:09

and for your recommendations.

1:31:13

>> Next, we have the parking authority.

1:31:38

Uh, good evening, council members. Uh,

1:31:40

and I'm going to echo one of the earlier

1:31:42

comments, and that is, uh, I'm here

1:31:45

having served as the chairman of the

1:31:47

parking authority since, uh, 2014, but

1:31:50

I've also served on the planning

1:31:52

commission, uh, as vice chair since, I

1:31:54

think it was 97. And this is the first

1:31:57

time that we've been asked to come in

1:31:59

front of council on an official basis as

1:32:01

planning commission. So I'm not going to

1:32:03

be covering that tonight. We have some

1:32:04

really good folks here from our group.

1:32:06

But uh just want to thank you. I mean

1:32:08

that's a it's a very welcome turn of

1:32:10

events. So with all that said uh Ver

1:32:14

McKisik

1:32:15

317 North Front Street as I mentioned

1:32:18

currently serve as the uh as the

1:32:21

chairman of the Harrisburg Parking

1:32:22

Authority. So what is it other than

1:32:24

boring u

1:32:26

uh Harrisburg parking authority was

1:32:28

created by the city uh in 1972 pursuant

1:32:32

to the parking authority laws of 1947.

1:32:35

Uh since the incorporation of the

1:32:38

authority has had a separate existence

1:32:40

with purposes and powers set forth in

1:32:42

the articles incorporation the act and

1:32:44

ordinance. Uh the current term or the

1:32:46

enabling legislation that created it uh

1:32:50

runs out in 2037.

1:32:52

So, um, presently, Harrisburg Parking

1:32:55

Authority operates, uh, a a reduced

1:32:58

quantity of parking related elements,

1:33:00

per se. Uh, the city-owned surface lots

1:33:03

on City Island. Uh, also the parking

1:33:07

garage on City Island. They were not

1:33:09

incorporated into the Harrisburg Strong

1:33:12

deal that I'll talk about in a moment.

1:33:15

Uh, we also operate a small service lot

1:33:17

between Malberry and Deubberry Streets

1:33:18

by the train station. Uh we likewise

1:33:21

managed a parking garage attached to the

1:33:24

uh Pennsylvania National Insurance

1:33:26

Company building. Uh in as I mentioned

1:33:29

in 2013, there was a thing called the

1:33:31

Harrisburg Strong Plan. Uh that was the

1:33:33

recovery uh from the the uh bankruptcy

1:33:37

situation. At that point, Harrisburg

1:33:39

Park authority transferred the remainder

1:33:41

of the parking system uh to Pennsylvania

1:33:44

Economic Development Finance Agency

1:33:46

called PTFA. Uh the garages and surface

1:33:49

lots were transferred by a lease under a

1:33:52

asset transfer agreement between the

1:33:53

city Harrisburg parking authority and

1:33:56

peta. Right now HPA is the Harrisburg

1:34:00

parking author authority is a leaseor

1:34:02

with the leasur's rights and duties

1:34:04

under the leases. Uh Harrisburg parking

1:34:07

authority is the transfer transfer. I

1:34:10

kind of love the lawyer worms. Uh

1:34:12

responsible for monitoring pedest

1:34:14

performance of its obligations under the

1:34:16

asset transfer agreement. Uh and the way

1:34:19

that works, revenue from the transferred

1:34:21

parking system flows through a revenue

1:34:23

what we call a waterfall by means

1:34:26

of which revenue is allocated to a

1:34:28

sequestered sequential tiered manner. uh

1:34:32

in recent years the level unfortunately

1:34:33

the waterfall which is supposed to

1:34:36

distur dist distribute the rents to HBA

1:34:38

and the payments to the city has

1:34:40

remained unfunded because of decreases

1:34:42

in uh income. Uh unfortunately unfunded

1:34:46

rent and city payments lapse at the end

1:34:48

of each year and do not acrew. So when

1:34:50

the year goes it's never coming back. Um

1:34:54

the current membership status uh uh the

1:34:58

uh we have five seats, four are filled.

1:35:01

All terms have expired. Uh the members

1:35:04

of the Harrisburg Parking Authority

1:35:06

Board continue to serve as was

1:35:08

referenced until appointed qualified.

1:35:12

The public engagement we meet once a

1:35:14

month uh if a quorum is available. Our

1:35:17

meetings are public subject to of course

1:35:18

the sunshine law. Uh in terms of

1:35:22

reporting structure, we are an

1:35:23

independent authority. Uh the mayor

1:35:26

appoints and can remove Harrisburg

1:35:27

parking authority board members. Uh we

1:35:30

do have an executive director employed

1:35:32

by the city who handles management of

1:35:34

tasks for us including the garages and

1:35:36

things that are on the island.

1:35:38

uh question relative to appointment and

1:35:41

and qualifications

1:35:43

uh really comes down to being familiar

1:35:45

with the city and also having an

1:35:47

understanding of parking and the parking

1:35:49

business and towards that end actually

1:35:52

most of the members uh not all anymore

1:35:54

but for a long time were members of the

1:35:56

part of the planning commission which

1:35:58

brought that information along along

1:36:00

with us. The uh one thing about the uh

1:36:03

parking the parking authority if I could

1:36:05

find the page I'm looking for here.

1:36:09

There it is. Just a quick summation

1:36:11

before I'm going to call before 19 or

1:36:13

2013 which was before the bankruptcy and

1:36:16

post plan I'll call it. Uh before 2013

1:36:20

the parking authority owned and operated

1:36:23

parking lots uh and meters. Now we're

1:36:27

just a title home lesser and u we have

1:36:30

the concessant agreement with PET. Uh

1:36:33

before we had a revenue pledge. It we

1:36:35

were quite a a financial engine for the

1:36:38

city back in the day. Uh today we're

1:36:40

just oversight and compliance. So we're

1:36:43

monitoring concessionire and hopefully

1:36:45

ensuring the agreements and executed in

1:36:47

compliance. Uh in the past we had direct

1:36:51

financing. The garages were done under

1:36:53

separate debt and um

1:36:56

Today we're conduits for financing. We

1:36:59

still have the ability to borrow money

1:37:02

uh in Pennsylvania under law, but we

1:37:04

haven't done that since the recovery

1:37:07

deal. Uh but we can issue debt in in

1:37:09

conjunction with PETO. And finally, of

1:37:12

course, it used to be that we integrated

1:37:14

with the city anything that had to do

1:37:15

with parking. Uh today, we're just

1:37:17

interfacing relative to issues regarding

1:37:20

city parking decisions, enforcements. Uh

1:37:23

to that end, we do end up intercepting a

1:37:25

number of comments that come in from uh

1:37:28

community groups who've done studies or

1:37:30

have had issues relative to parking uh

1:37:32

which feeds over to the parking

1:37:34

authority or the planning commission on

1:37:37

a regular basis, capital neighbors,

1:37:40

other folks within the recovery or the

1:37:42

no compete zone under the issue. So, so

1:37:46

that like I say is very boring, but

1:37:48

that's what we do.

1:37:50

So, I'll take any questions. It's not

1:37:52

boring. It's good information for people

1:37:54

to know. As you know, parking is a

1:37:57

premium everywhere in the city and it's

1:37:59

a discussion that we have quite often.

1:38:02

Um, I did want to note, you mentioned

1:38:05

that all of the five members are

1:38:07

appointed by the mayor and the term

1:38:09

length is five years. They are staggered

1:38:12

terms. I just wanted to review the

1:38:15

formal reports and advice provided as

1:38:17

I've been doing. An annual financial and

1:38:20

activities report should be submitted as

1:38:23

required by the urban redevelopment law

1:38:26

typically to the city of Harrisburg and

1:38:29

filed with the Commonwealth of

1:38:30

Pennsylvania. Project proposals and

1:38:33

plans should be reviewed in coordination

1:38:36

with city council and the mayor when

1:38:39

redevelopment activities involve public

1:38:42

approvals or funding. And then public

1:38:46

notices and hearings provided as

1:38:49

required under state law for

1:38:51

redevelopment project approval and

1:38:53

property. Oh, sorry. I'm reading the

1:38:56

redevelopment authorities. Sorry. I'm

1:38:58

like

1:38:59

here. This is really

1:39:00

>> Hold on. Sorry, I was on the wrong page.

1:39:03

I flipped the other way. Annual

1:39:06

financial statements and audits should

1:39:08

be filed in compliance with the pens

1:39:10

with the parking authority law and

1:39:12

provided to the commonwealth and the

1:39:14

city. Policy and operational reports

1:39:18

should be re reviewed by the board of

1:39:20

directors and shared with the city when

1:39:23

policies or partnerships impact

1:39:25

municipal operations. And finally,

1:39:27

public information, notices, rate

1:39:30

structures, and facility updates are

1:39:32

made available to the public as part of

1:39:34

the authorities's transparency

1:39:36

obligations. I just have one question.

1:39:40

Where are your meetings held?

1:39:42

>> Uh, we have our own offices that are

1:39:44

located in a public safety building.

1:39:46

>> Okay. Thank you for clarifying. I don't

1:39:48

have any other questions. I will open

1:39:50

the floor to my colleagues who may have

1:39:51

additional questions. I'm going to start

1:39:53

with Councilman Jones.

1:39:56

Thank you, President Hill. Yes.

1:39:59

>> Woo. Parking, parking, parking.

1:40:02

First, again, I'll say start out saying

1:40:04

thank you for your service and

1:40:06

everything that you're doing. Um, you

1:40:08

know, it's very I just have two areas um

1:40:12

that I want to look at in your general

1:40:14

function when it comes to uh regulation

1:40:17

and enforcement. Can you expound on that

1:40:20

role? Uh because

1:40:23

>> Sure. Sure. You know, when I first when

1:40:24

I first got here, uh, one of the first

1:40:27

things I jumped on was, uh, ordinances

1:40:29

here, parking on the curbs. So, I just

1:40:32

want to see what role you guys play. We

1:40:34

we actually have little role in that

1:40:36

because that was contained of both

1:40:37

meters enforcement which is which is

1:40:40

parking tickets and uh the finance from

1:40:43

the garages operation the garages within

1:40:45

the no compete area which is most of the

1:40:47

downtown was transferred to pedi

1:40:49

standard parking and I think their esbos

1:40:51

plea they've just gone through a name

1:40:53

change.

1:40:54

>> Um so we really have very little control

1:40:56

over that. uh if it's City Island, the

1:40:59

garage there or outside of the no

1:41:01

compete zone, uh we have the ability uh

1:41:05

to have a little bit more to to do and

1:41:07

say and work work with.

1:41:09

>> So nothing like in the in the areas of

1:41:11

uh like Allison Hill, South Harrisburg.

1:41:13

>> Well, we could do there that that is not

1:41:15

part of the uh of the no compete. What

1:41:17

and I I keep mentioning no compete. What

1:41:19

I should mention there was there's a map

1:41:21

that was created which contains most of

1:41:23

downtown Harrisburg and up just past the

1:41:25

Broad Street Market. And within that

1:41:28

area, one of the things that the the

1:41:30

agreement, which is 40-year agreement,

1:41:32

>> yeah,

1:41:33

>> I'm aware it was a part of the strong.

1:41:35

>> And one of the things I don't think a

1:41:36

lot of people understand is that that

1:41:38

40-year deal, we were 10 years or 12

1:41:40

years into it because the financing or

1:41:42

the the funds were not coming in. It was

1:41:45

refinanced two years ago to prevent it

1:41:46

from going into default and added

1:41:48

another 10 years. So, we're still

1:41:51

sitting at 40 years in this deal, 203.

1:41:55

Um so so that's really one of the

1:41:58

struggles the u uh no compete the

1:42:01

biggest thing and I'm going to

1:42:02

>> before you move on who who made that

1:42:04

decision

1:42:05

>> that was negotiated between all the bond

1:42:07

holders the city attorneys other

1:42:09

entities from the state pedce

1:42:13

um and and we would welcome and we would

1:42:16

like to make the offer to have our

1:42:19

council come and Tim Anderson and step

1:42:22

you through it because it's a

1:42:23

fascinating

1:42:24

read to see where we are because it has

1:42:28

such a big in my opinion impact on the

1:42:31

future of this recovery of downtown

1:42:32

Harrisburg.

1:42:33

>> Absolutely it does and and and I think

1:42:35

we're all there and and we're looking at

1:42:37

this. So yeah, I'll probably I'll ask

1:42:40

legal this question, but the question I

1:42:42

was going to ask is can we get out of

1:42:44

this gone play? So, uh I know it's we'll

1:42:48

take a financial hit if we if we if we

1:42:50

attempted to do this, but um it is one

1:42:53

of the biggest uh pet peeves right now,

1:42:55

especially when we're looking in and and

1:42:57

bringing downtown back in any capacity.

1:42:59

Uh go ahead, Mr. L. I'll see you.

1:43:02

>> Not sure. Is that is that a question?

1:43:04

Can we break

1:43:05

>> Can we break a contract?

1:43:07

>> I was going to ask it off, but if you

1:43:08

want to answer, sure.

1:43:09

>> I mean, any contract can be broken. I'm

1:43:12

not sure that that's a a good idea,

1:43:14

right? Obviously, we would need to

1:43:15

review the contract and speak with

1:43:18

everyone to figure out what that could

1:43:20

mean,

1:43:21

>> right? But it's generally not a good

1:43:23

idea to try and go breaking contracts.

1:43:25

That's why you take your time and make

1:43:26

them in the first place, right?

1:43:28

>> Is there is there And I haven't looked

1:43:31

deeply into this policy, but I'm just

1:43:34

knowing

1:43:35

and I don't want to call them out, but

1:43:37

you know this some of these things have

1:43:39

ruined other areas, other cities uh with

1:43:42

the parking. Um so and it is a concern

1:43:45

again if we're looking to um change

1:43:49

directions in what we're doing far as uh

1:43:51

bringing people back into the city.

1:43:53

People want to en enjoy our our

1:43:55

festivities, our historical areas, you

1:43:58

know, and and these things are in place.

1:44:00

So is there any room for renegotiation?

1:44:05

>> Again, you're really not renegotiating.

1:44:07

If there's a contract in place, you're

1:44:09

breaching the contract. So like

1:44:13

it's not really a question. Can you

1:44:14

breach a contract? Yes, there are

1:44:16

consequences when you do. Can you

1:44:17

renegotiate? Yes. If the other side

1:44:19

agrees, there's clause that says

1:44:22

>> it, you know, you can make amendments,

1:44:24

but both sides need to be done in

1:44:26

writing.

1:44:28

So it's a contract. It can be amended,

1:44:31

but there are consequences when you

1:44:32

amend contracts.

1:44:34

>> Okay. Yeah. I mean, the I pretty much

1:44:37

figured that you could, but I I know it

1:44:39

probably wouldn't even be feasible to

1:44:40

do, but it's just something that is is

1:44:43

it's a big problem and I I think we all

1:44:45

are there on that. It's a big problem in

1:44:47

our city. Um along with um some of the

1:44:50

other parking issues. Uh but one of the

1:44:53

things I see too is their purpose of um

1:44:56

to reduce traffic congestions.

1:44:59

>> We we don't have that problem right now.

1:45:03

>> Support local business. ago, we had that

1:45:05

problem. And the the deal was was really

1:45:07

put together uh under the vision of the

1:45:10

downtown as basically a giant office

1:45:12

park

1:45:13

>> with 20 to 30,000 people traveling into

1:45:15

the city every day. That's changed and

1:45:18

we've been waiting for it to perhaps

1:45:19

come back for the last four or five

1:45:21

years. There's been a little bit, but

1:45:23

it's still running deficits and it's not

1:45:25

really covering many of the tiers of

1:45:27

financing because there's a whole series

1:45:28

of levels of bonds that have been

1:45:31

placed. So ultimately something will

1:45:33

have to be restructured how that looks.

1:45:35

Um the biggest thing that from a

1:45:38

planning basis is however we have to pay

1:45:40

them back somehow. Uh but the biggest

1:45:42

thing from a planning basis is that

1:45:44

right now for the no compete area you

1:45:47

know city sponsored property parking is

1:45:50

not is effectively off the table

1:45:52

completely. That be the garages building

1:45:54

new garages. um private parking it's

1:45:57

possible but if you look around the

1:46:00

downtown you see it's a very strong

1:46:02

upward look because the final author

1:46:04

authority of that is Peda and the

1:46:06

operator not the planning commission so

1:46:09

where in the past you had Pennsylvania

1:46:11

National Insurance building a parking

1:46:12

garage and putting headquarters downtown

1:46:15

you're not seeing it now

1:46:16

>> this day yeah

1:46:17

>> you know I'm working with a developer

1:46:18

right now who's looking to put do

1:46:20

quarter million square foot building

1:46:21

bring it back to life um but he's

1:46:24

looking60 62 apartments and we're

1:46:27

looking at the need for to be paying

1:46:29

$320 to $380 a month for reserve parking

1:46:33

space and it's wiping out the

1:46:35

performance.

1:46:36

>> Yeah,

1:46:37

>> that's where it's really at in the basis

1:46:39

of our recovery deal. So, I'm getting

1:46:40

off tangent. That's not what we're here

1:46:41

for, right?

1:46:42

>> I apologize.

1:46:43

>> No problem. Um I I won't hold you any

1:46:45

longer, but those are just some of the I

1:46:47

just wanted to see what role you played

1:46:49

in um in enforcement and uh and some of

1:46:52

the policies that we have, but I see

1:46:54

it's kind of restricted to certain

1:46:55

areas. Yes, sir.

1:46:56

>> And and and that's fine. So, I'll keep

1:46:59

beating up this ladder to try to get

1:47:01

some of this stuff resolved. So, thank

1:47:02

you. I have no further questions and

1:47:04

thank you again for your service.

1:47:06

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

1:47:08

questions?

1:47:10

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh pretty

1:47:12

much just echoing the sentiments of

1:47:14

Councilman Jones and um just to add on

1:47:17

top of it, a lot of our residents issues

1:47:19

with parking is just the space there is

1:47:21

none that's provided. Um a lot of our

1:47:24

sidewalks don't exist. A lot of our

1:47:26

curving that would indicate where to

1:47:28

park still, you know, isn't available in

1:47:30

certain neighborhoods around the city.

1:47:32

But I I understand your jurisdiction

1:47:34

would only, you know, be detailed to

1:47:36

certain parameters. So, um, as

1:47:38

Councilman Jones said, you know, maybe

1:47:40

we could just kind of keep beating that

1:47:42

horse, but I do appreciate you being

1:47:43

here this evening, and I look forward

1:47:45

to, um, a lot of the work you'll be

1:47:47

doing in the future. Thank you.

1:47:49

>> Thank you.

1:47:50

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

1:47:54

>> So, she had to uh sign off. She might be

1:47:56

trying to log back on here.

1:47:58

>> Okay. Thank you, Vice President Green.

1:48:00

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Uh,

1:48:02

it's good to see you tonight, Mr.

1:48:04

McKisick. Um,

1:48:05

>> I don't have any questions for you. Um,

1:48:08

I'd love to sit down and talk about how

1:48:09

the parking deal was refinanced, uh, and

1:48:11

get to know a little more about that.

1:48:13

Uh, because that is interesting that it

1:48:15

kind of set us back 10 years. Um, but as

1:48:18

far as questions for the parking

1:48:19

authority, I don't have any tonight.

1:48:21

Thank you.

1:48:23

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

1:48:25

questions?

1:48:27

>> Off. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. McKisick,

1:48:30

for being here. I just want to say thank

1:48:32

you for my parking decal. I can park

1:48:35

anywhere around the city and not have to

1:48:37

pay.

1:48:38

>> We We know certain things. Yes.

1:48:39

>> Thank you. And I don't have any

1:48:41

questions.

1:48:43

>> Thank you. Thanks for being here and for

1:48:46

participating.

1:48:47

>> This is great.

1:48:48

>> Sure. Thank you.

1:48:50

>> Next we have the planning commission.

1:49:02

All right. Good evening. Uh my name is

1:49:04

Sean Utul. I'm on the city planning

1:49:06

commission obviously and I uh wish to

1:49:09

echo Mr. McKisik's comments. I've been

1:49:10

on the planning commission for too long

1:49:13

now. Uh and this is the first

1:49:15

opportunity I've had we've had to come

1:49:18

before you like this and I I appreciate

1:49:20

that opportunity. Uh we are the planning

1:49:23

commission is enabled by the uh

1:49:26

Pennsylvania municipal municipal

1:49:28

planning code. Uh like we are merely an

1:49:31

advisory board. Our decisions come to

1:49:34

either the city council for final

1:49:36

approval or to the zoning hearing board.

1:49:39

Uh we review requests for subdivisions

1:49:42

uh land development plans uh relief from

1:49:46

zoning uh requirements such as a

1:49:49

variance or a special exception.

1:49:52

uh within the m last oh seven or eight

1:49:54

years of most relevance we were uh

1:49:57

involved in the we were responsible for

1:49:59

the ad adoption of the u the

1:50:01

comprehensive plan and we continue to be

1:50:04

uh responsible for any amendments there

1:50:06

too uh we meet monthly first uh first

1:50:11

Wednesday of every month uh public

1:50:13

participation there at those meetings

1:50:15

and the public does come out when

1:50:17

there's something going on in their

1:50:18

neighborhood and they and they feel

1:50:20

involved and and want to express their

1:50:22

positions. Uh we're a seven member the

1:50:25

yeah the bylaws provide for seven

1:50:27

members and I'm happy to say we're at

1:50:29

full force right now. We we have all

1:50:32

seven board members are filled. Uh which

1:50:35

is nice because we don't have to you

1:50:36

know cancel meetings because of a lack

1:50:38

of a quorum. U I will say we have

1:50:42

probably only two me two of those

1:50:43

members who who are not on expired

1:50:46

terms. Uh

1:50:48

uh and up until up until about a half

1:50:51

hour ago, we actually had a quorum here.

1:50:52

Um we had Ver McKisik who you just heard

1:50:55

from uh Deon Jordan over there and

1:50:58

Basier Vincent who just left and had he

1:51:00

not left, we'd had a quorum. We had four

1:51:02

uh including myself, we had four of us.

1:51:04

The other three are Joe Asbury and uh uh

1:51:09

James Setter Reed. They're both retired

1:51:11

state employees and an Merrick who's an

1:51:13

engineer. Uh

1:51:20

yeah, as far as what you know what the

1:51:22

requirements are to get on there. I

1:51:24

don't think it's written down anywhere,

1:51:25

but uh just we tend to be the people who

1:51:28

are involved in their communities that

1:51:30

have a vested interest in the city, uh

1:51:33

want to, you know, want to make more of

1:51:36

an impact and ask how I can do that and

1:51:38

they get put put on the the board. Uh I

1:51:42

mean for example you got Debron and uh

1:51:45

and Bassier I mean they're so gung-ho

1:51:47

they come to event like this you know uh

1:51:50

in seven oh god many years ago a young

1:51:53

lady she's not so young anymore barely

1:51:56

out of barely out of college she wanted

1:51:58

to get involved in uh and vice president

1:52:02

Green became a member of the planning

1:52:03

commission uh and so that's basically

1:52:07

the you know the requirements to get on

1:52:09

uh who do we report to uh really nobody.

1:52:14

And I I don't mean that arrogantly. I

1:52:15

mean, like I said, we we we make our

1:52:16

decisions when and they come to you.

1:52:18

There's really really nobody that we

1:52:20

report to. Uh that's really all I have

1:52:25

for you.

1:52:26

>> Okay. Thank you so much for being here.

1:52:29

I'm going to review the formal reports

1:52:31

and advice provided. an annual report

1:52:34

submitted to city council by March 1st

1:52:37

each year as required by the

1:52:39

Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning

1:52:41

Code, recommendations on zoning

1:52:44

amendments and map changes submitted to

1:52:47

city council, and recommendations on

1:52:49

subdivision land development and

1:52:52

variance requests submitted to the

1:52:54

zoning hearing board and city council as

1:52:56

appropriate.

1:52:59

I wanted to note that all of the seven

1:53:02

appointments for the planning commission

1:53:05

are appointed by the mayor with city

1:53:07

council consent. The term length uh four

1:53:11

years and no more than two commissioners

1:53:14

can be replaced or reappointed during a

1:53:18

calendar year.

1:53:20

So I don't I don't have any questions

1:53:21

for you. I'm going to open the floor to

1:53:23

my colleagues. I will begin with Vice

1:53:26

President Green.

1:53:28

Thank you, President Hill. Um, I don't

1:53:30

have any questions for the planning

1:53:32

commission. I had the honor of serving

1:53:34

with you all uh for a few years there.

1:53:36

Um, I said I was going to come back to

1:53:38

some meetings and I've only come back to

1:53:40

one, so I apologize for that. I will be

1:53:43

back at some point. Um, I just want to

1:53:45

say thank you all for your service. Um,

1:53:48

thank you all for taking me in. Uh, Mr.

1:53:50

Oul and Mr. McKisik along with the other

1:53:53

members of the planning commission

1:53:54

really took me under their wing when I

1:53:56

uh first came on because I was like what

1:53:59

am I doing here and what do you do? Um I

1:54:01

had no idea um what the planning

1:54:04

commission did uh how important of a job

1:54:05

you all have uh or even if I fit in. Um

1:54:09

and you all really took the time to

1:54:11

explain things to me. I came in um just

1:54:13

in the midst of the comprehensive plan,

1:54:15

the original draft. Uh and so that was

1:54:18

really mind-blowing. But um you all

1:54:21

taught me a lot about the city, about

1:54:22

the city's history, uh about the the

1:54:24

roles of boards and commissions. I

1:54:26

didn't even know boards and commissions

1:54:27

existed honestly before that point. So I

1:54:30

just want to say thank you all for your

1:54:31

continued support uh even to this day.

1:54:33

You'll still reach out and provide

1:54:35

support to me. So I appreciate that and

1:54:37

know that I'm always here uh if you need

1:54:39

anything. Um and I will start coming to

1:54:41

some meetings every now and then.

1:54:43

>> Now and then.

1:54:44

>> It only took you a couple months. You're

1:54:45

grilling, you know, applicants about

1:54:47

you. I don't see the uh I I I don't see

1:54:50

the the hardship for that application.

1:54:53

God, where'd she learn that?

1:54:55

>> You guys,

1:54:57

so thank you. I don't have any other

1:54:58

questions. Thank you.

1:55:00

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

1:55:02

questions?

1:55:03

>> Thank you, Vice President Hill. Thank

1:55:04

you and thank you for being here this

1:55:06

evening. I just appreciate uh you being

1:55:09

here and uh all of the boards being here

1:55:12

this evening to give a brief explanation

1:55:15

of uh what you they do and uh just an

1:55:19

overall view I'm learning and uh each

1:55:23

time you come here a piece of the puzzle

1:55:26

you know gets put in the correct slot.

1:55:29

So, uh, thank you very much again for

1:55:32

being here and for, uh, your willingness

1:55:35

to continue to serve.

1:55:37

>> Thank you for having us.

1:55:39

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

1:55:41

questions?

1:55:42

>> For the first time, I have no questions.

1:55:46

>> Shocker. Thank you, Councilman

1:55:49

Rodriguez. Any questions?

1:55:52

>> Nothing to me. Thank you.

1:55:53

>> Thank you. Has Councilwoman Ross joined

1:55:55

us again?

1:56:00

Okay,

1:56:01

thank you very much for your time.

1:56:03

>> Thank you.

1:56:04

>> God bless you. Next, we have the zoning

1:56:07

hearing board.

1:56:25

I'll speak up this time so I can hear

1:56:27

me. Good evening, madam.

1:56:29

>> Can you please move the microphone

1:56:30

closer to you? Thank you.

1:56:33

>> Is that better?

1:56:34

>> Yes.

1:56:34

>> Okay. Good evening, Madam President.

1:56:36

city council members um zoning hearing

1:56:40

board and everybody else in attendance.

1:56:43

Harris Harrisburg zoning hearing board

1:56:45

is a body composed of three members and

1:56:47

one alternate. Okay. Appointed by city

1:56:51

council.

1:56:52

The board has its own solicitor. Okay.

1:56:56

Um that use it we use as legal counsel

1:56:58

for any the any of u review and decision

1:57:02

criteria we have. Okay. Um, we review

1:57:08

requests for relief from aspects of the

1:57:10

of the city zoning code as well as

1:57:13

appeals on zoning determinations from

1:57:16

the zoning officer.

1:57:19

Meetings are generally held the third

1:57:21

Wednesday of each month in city

1:57:24

council's chambers.

1:57:26

I get the chance to occupy the

1:57:27

president's seat a lot. Okay. Unless

1:57:30

there's a conflict of a holiday, then we

1:57:32

it's the next available Monday

1:57:36

pri prior to the upcoming zoning hearing

1:57:39

board meeting. The agenda will reflect

1:57:41

the cases to be discussed after the

1:57:44

meeting and documentation will be

1:57:46

updated to reflect the actions taken by

1:57:49

the board. Okay.

1:57:52

Agendas for the meetings

1:57:54

um are actually on the city's web page.

1:57:58

Okay. It's normally there a week before

1:58:01

the meeting date. Okay. And it's a

1:58:03

requirement.

1:58:05

Um it's made by the by our by the

1:58:08

planning bureau.

1:58:09

Little note, please note that because

1:58:12

the meeting is a quasi judicial meeting,

1:58:16

minutes are kept by a court stenographer

1:58:20

and not the city and not the city staff.

1:58:23

Okay. Um,

1:58:26

we also were broadcasted. Our all of our

1:58:29

meetings are on channel 20. Okay. So,

1:58:31

it's for public record and they are open

1:58:34

to the public. Anybody can attend.

1:58:38

Um, transcripts can be obtained by

1:58:41

contacting either our either our

1:58:43

solicitor or myself and we'll make that

1:58:46

information get that information to you.

1:58:48

Okay.

1:58:51

Meetings. meetings are held, we said, on

1:58:53

third Monday of of every month. Okay?

1:58:57

And we operate under the Pennsylvania

1:58:59

Municipalities Planning Code or and the

1:59:04

Harrisburg uh city codes. Okay? There

1:59:07

are legal input to our process. Okay?

1:59:10

And we follow specific rules and

1:59:12

procedures. When we go over those steps

1:59:15

one by one, what we actually do, okay?

1:59:18

Our agendas, we we talked about that.

1:59:20

Our agendas are out one week before the

1:59:22

meeting. They're available. They are

1:59:24

online. And the agendas contain every ca

1:59:28

any cases we're going to hear. Okay. Uh

1:59:32

you can go to the city website, click on

1:59:35

it, and you can see the case um and any

1:59:38

related material to the case. One little

1:59:41

note for that. All of our cases are

1:59:44

reviewed by our solicitor before the

1:59:47

meeting. Okay. And the zoning most of

1:59:49

the well our zoning members we tend to

1:59:52

review the cases too sometimes like

1:59:55

going out and actually walking through

1:59:56

the uh the properties that are qu that

1:59:59

are under question. Okay.

2:00:02

Okay. Again we talked about the minutes

2:00:04

for kept by a synographer. Okay.

2:00:07

It's public hearing. All hearings must

2:00:11

be advertised in the in local newspaper

2:00:14

for general circulation for two

2:00:17

consecutive weeks prior to the meeting

2:00:20

day. 15 days. Okay. We've actually had

2:00:23

times where we've had to reschedu cases

2:00:25

because we did not meet that 15-day

2:00:28

limit. Okay. But it's that's again it

2:00:32

has to be put into the local newspapers

2:00:35

and a copy must be given to the

2:00:36

applicants

2:00:38

impartiality. Uh since we're a quasi

2:00:41

legal board,

2:00:43

we have to be fair. We're guided by the

2:00:46

law. Okay. The law

2:00:49

um testimony of the applicants. Okay.

2:00:53

Any documentation which is evidence. We

2:00:57

don't use strict strict rules of civil

2:00:59

of evidence for civil law, but we look

2:01:01

at all that information. Okay.

2:01:06

Um, again, we said again, we're we

2:01:08

function fairly equitably upholding the

2:01:11

goals and objective of the community.

2:01:13

One note here,

2:01:16

it's not whether we like the project or

2:01:18

we don't like the project. We can't be

2:01:21

biased in any form of fashion. If it's a

2:01:23

perceived bias, we will recuse ourselves

2:01:25

from that from from making that

2:01:27

decision. And it has happened since I've

2:01:30

been on the zoning hearing board where

2:01:31

I've had to recuse myself. And what a

2:01:34

recusal normally results in the

2:01:36

familiarity with the applicant or the

2:01:40

property in question. Okay? Or again, or

2:01:44

close proximity to the property in

2:01:46

question. Okay? uh when we say if you

2:01:48

live within a few blocks of the

2:01:50

property, we shouldn't be making any

2:01:52

decisions on that. We need to basically

2:01:53

recuse ourselves. Little rule two, it's

2:01:56

always a majority decision that's going

2:01:58

to be made. And I'm saying that to city

2:02:01

council because right now we have uh

2:02:03

vacancy on the zoning hearing board and

2:02:06

our alternate is vacant. So we have two

2:02:09

people on a tie condition on a decision

2:02:13

decision. the uh decision is

2:02:15

automatically reject is already

2:02:17

defeated. Okay. So if it's a tie vote,

2:02:21

it's not passed.

2:02:24

Okay. On for rejections, for denial.

2:02:27

Okay.

2:02:32

Let's go through. Okay. What's the

2:02:34

reasons for the hearing? Okay. You know,

2:02:36

we we're not there drinking coffee and

2:02:38

just saying hello to everybody. Zon

2:02:40

hearing board reviews applications for

2:02:43

spec for spec specific reasons as

2:02:45

outlined by the municipal code. Okay.

2:02:49

And planning codes applicants normally

2:02:51

are requesting a variance or special

2:02:53

exception to that code. Okay. Which

2:02:57

again at that point in time they'll

2:02:59

produce evidence and we'll make a

2:03:01

decision. Okay. Challenges to that code

2:03:05

have to be valid. Okay. Um and you must

2:03:08

have documentation.

2:03:10

Okay. So uh and when and sometimes

2:03:14

hardship can be used but that hardship

2:03:16

needs to be proven. Okay. To the best of

2:03:19

uh for us to interpret it.

2:03:24

All decisions made by the zoning hearing

2:03:26

board are appealable. Okay. If it's a

2:03:28

denial, you have the right to appeal

2:03:30

that. And that's the reason why we have

2:03:32

a court shenographer. Okay. you appeal

2:03:35

us to the court of common please.

2:03:38

So if you do not agree with our

2:03:40

decision, okay, or we denied you, you

2:03:44

can appeal to the court of common

2:03:45

please. I used to sit down and sometimes

2:03:48

I'm not bragging but we've only in the

2:03:51

last 10 years we only have one case

2:03:56

was actually it was denied to the court

2:03:59

of common please and it went up to the

2:04:00

Commonwealth Court and that's where

2:04:02

basically was overturned.

2:04:04

So, we're we we tend to do our work

2:04:06

well. We use the

2:04:09

the law in our decision criteria, okay?

2:04:13

We're not law enforcement people. We

2:04:15

don't enforce the rules. We use that as

2:04:18

input to our decision criteria and our

2:04:20

discussion. And that's why we have a

2:04:21

solicitor. Okay? We take a lot of our

2:04:24

solicitors before the meeting. They will

2:04:27

write a recap up. Most of our input

2:04:30

comes from the planning uh from the

2:04:32

planning

2:04:33

bureau and from the planning uh

2:04:36

committee. Okay,

2:04:41

let's more again talk about before the

2:04:44

hearings. The applicant must file the

2:04:46

application, pay the fees, provide

2:04:48

required information,

2:04:50

the our solicitor and the municipal

2:04:53

solicitor. Okay, we do actually uh the

2:04:55

city is also represented in our meetings

2:04:57

the law department. Okay, so they're

2:05:00

actually participants and if they have

2:05:02

issues with of of

2:05:05

what's being presented or the

2:05:07

questioning that's being and we can we

2:05:10

can ask questions of the applicant.

2:05:12

Okay, they tend to basically let us know

2:05:15

that well that's not germanine to the

2:05:17

sub to the subject matter. One other

2:05:20

thing too in the hearing

2:05:22

the applicant

2:05:25

can testify his uh anybody who's

2:05:28

supporting him or are not in support of

2:05:31

him can testify. All testimony is sworn

2:05:34

testimony. Okay. Anybody who appears

2:05:37

from his own hearing board is going to

2:05:39

speak. You will have to take an oath

2:05:41

basically that you're presenting factual

2:05:43

information.

2:05:45

Okay. After the meeting um a decision is

2:05:49

our decisions are made. Our decisions

2:05:51

are public record. Okay. We have up to

2:05:54

45 days to get to basically make that

2:05:58

decision available to the applicant.

2:06:00

Okay. And it can be plus minus but it

2:06:03

has to be we have to do that. Um and we

2:06:06

also since it's public record has we

2:06:09

basically retain that information is

2:06:11

filed.

2:06:13

Uh

2:06:16

I I'm hope I think that's about all I

2:06:18

have. Okay. It's it's really we look at

2:06:21

it as a as a I said quasi legal organ uh

2:06:24

bureau and we follow it mostly as you

2:06:28

would go in front of from as you go in

2:06:30

front of a judge.

2:06:32

>> Okay.

2:06:33

Any questions?

2:06:34

>> Thank you very much. Um I don't have any

2:06:37

questions. As a former member of the

2:06:39

zoning hearing board, um I really

2:06:42

enjoyed my time. I served with u Mr. Dan

2:06:45

Dler and Mr. Tom Leonard and they too

2:06:51

ushered me onto the board very um nicely

2:06:55

and got to know them. It was it was a

2:06:57

good time.

2:06:59

>> I just want to I brought you some cases

2:07:01

in front of you.

2:07:02

>> Oh yes, you have. You have. You know,

2:07:04

I've really always

2:07:07

um enjoyed hearing from community

2:07:10

members that were either directly

2:07:13

impacted by a case that we were hearing

2:07:17

um or maybe adjacent something in your

2:07:20

neighborhood. That's how I I initially

2:07:23

met you. Um, so it's always important

2:07:26

for people to pay attention um,

2:07:29

particularly to the work of the zoning

2:07:31

hearing board because a lot of the

2:07:33

development um, around you uh, goes

2:07:36

through this board. So, it's helpful to

2:07:38

know.

2:07:39

>> I'll review the formal reports and

2:07:41

advice provided. I think you covered it,

2:07:43

but I just want to note since I've been

2:07:45

reading them, written decisions and

2:07:47

findings issued to applicants and

2:07:50

recorded as official city

2:07:51

determinations,

2:07:53

variance and acceptance exception

2:07:56

approvals provided to the zoning officer

2:07:58

for incorporation into zoning and

2:08:00

building permits and appealable orders

2:08:03

are decisions decisions may be appealed

2:08:07

to the Dolphin County Court of Common

2:08:08

please under the Pennsylvania

2:08:10

Municipalities Planning Code.

2:08:12

As you mentioned, the board is comprised

2:08:14

of three members. Um, and they are

2:08:17

appointed by city council and the term

2:08:19

length is three years.

2:08:23

>> Yes. Thank you.

2:08:24

>> You're welcome. I don't have any other

2:08:25

questions, so I'll open it up to open

2:08:28

the floor to my colleagues. I'll begin

2:08:30

with Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

2:08:32

questions?

2:08:33

>> Well, thank you, President Hill, and

2:08:35

thank you, Mr. Fipps, for continuing to

2:08:38

serve our community. It's good to see

2:08:40

you this evening. Thank you.

2:08:43

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

2:08:45

questions?

2:08:46

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening,

2:08:47

Mr. Fipps. It's good to see you as

2:08:48

always. I don't have any questions for

2:08:50

you. I know a little bit about the

2:08:51

zoning hearing board. Um, actually,

2:08:54

before I was on the planning commission,

2:08:56

I was actually originally asked to be

2:08:58

the alternate for the zoning hearing

2:08:59

board. That's about the the second time

2:09:02

I actually got to meet President Bowers

2:09:04

at that time. Um, Miss Bowers at that

2:09:06

time, now President Hill, uh, because

2:09:08

she was being uh coming in

2:09:11

for the work session to to be

2:09:13

interviewed was to be on the zoning

2:09:14

hearing board and that's the first time

2:09:16

we really got to sit down and have a

2:09:17

discussion. Um so I know a little bit

2:09:19

about the zoning hearing board. I thank

2:09:20

you for your continued service in

2:09:22

different capacities and thank you for

2:09:23

being here tonight.

2:09:24

>> Thank you.

2:09:25

>> Thank you. That is the first time we

2:09:29

um Councilman Rodriguez, do you have any

2:09:32

questions?

2:09:33

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh thank

2:09:35

you, Mr. Fipps, for your testimony this

2:09:37

evening. It's always refreshing to not

2:09:40

only see people filling these vacancies,

2:09:42

but their passion for the boards they're

2:09:43

serving. And thank you, Madam President

2:09:45

and Vice President for sharing your

2:09:46

stories and, you know, just how

2:09:48

successful it can be. You know, the

2:09:50

struggles of filling these roles. So to

2:09:52

hear it on the positive end, getting

2:09:54

people in there, filling the positions,

2:09:56

being passionate, it means the world.

2:09:58

So, thank you all this evening.

2:10:00

>> Thank you. Councilman Jones, any

2:10:02

questions?

2:10:04

>> Um, no. Uh, yes.

2:10:08

Yeah. Yeah. Sorry, I I forgot my mic was

2:10:11

on.

2:10:13

No. Um, what I should have asked the

2:10:16

planning commission and what I'll just

2:10:18

say to you guys, and I think I said this

2:10:20

to you personally, but I just want to

2:10:22

have this on record that, um, how often

2:10:25

are you guys sharing information? One of

2:10:29

the reason why I'm asking that is

2:10:31

because um there was an instance that I

2:10:33

saw where an individual made it all the

2:10:36

way to the zoning hearing board and then

2:10:42

everything unraveled after Go ahead.

2:10:44

>> Yeah, I was going to say because they're

2:10:45

a quasi judicial board. Oh,

2:10:47

>> they can't do that.

2:10:48

>> They It's like a judge. You can't say,

2:10:49

"Hey, let me let me tell you about this

2:10:50

case." Right. So that's

2:10:52

>> Yeah. So let me let me rephrase the

2:10:54

question. Thank you for that because I

2:10:55

don't want to get Mr. Fipps in trouble.

2:10:59

Uh so h how can we just share this

2:11:02

information? You know some of these

2:11:04

committees and boards it may be boring

2:11:06

to some people and unless they're an

2:11:08

applicant um and then they have to like

2:11:10

wait a minute you know so they get

2:11:12

stopped somewhere. So

2:11:15

this is a I guess I don't know how how

2:11:17

can I answer that question.

2:11:18

>> So so I think the distinction is what is

2:11:20

the difference between the roles of

2:11:22

those two boards right the planning

2:11:24

commission very often in the planning

2:11:25

version of the world is Is this a good

2:11:28

idea? This sounds great for Harrisburg.

2:11:30

I like your business idea. The zoning

2:11:32

board, like a judge, is stuck with, did

2:11:34

you meet your burden of proof and your

2:11:36

evidence you put on before us? And so

2:11:38

the the planning board can vote

2:11:39

enthusiastically for a project

2:11:42

>> and and the board members of the zoning

2:11:43

are left with there's there's a

2:11:45

five-part test. You you missed step

2:11:47

three.

2:11:48

>> Yeah.

2:11:48

>> And this test was set up by the

2:11:50

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the

2:11:51

Municipal Planning Code. So it's not

2:11:53

it's not an optional test.

2:11:54

>> So let me do this then. I would

2:11:56

encourage the community.

2:11:58

>> I got an answer for your I got an answer

2:11:59

for your question. Input to my input to

2:12:03

our

2:12:05

to our decision to the documents that we

2:12:08

view is always a report from the

2:12:10

planning commission

2:12:11

>> and that planning is basically

2:12:14

um each of the planning commission

2:12:16

members they question the applicant.

2:12:19

Okay. I get we get to see that but we

2:12:22

see that as part of the package the the

2:12:26

case package that's going to come in

2:12:27

front of

2:12:28

>> Got you. So so there is some information

2:12:30

that's minimal,

2:12:31

>> right? It's not a communication per se

2:12:34

of contacting them. It's a written

2:12:37

document because that's evidence that's

2:12:39

going to be brought in at for the zoning

2:12:41

hearing meeting. Okay. So the same

2:12:44

package you get for a land development

2:12:46

plan when it's a zoning question they

2:12:48

get that same report for from planning

2:12:51

commission for a zoning matter.

2:12:54

>> Gotcha.

2:12:54

>> So that's that that thing you see that

2:12:56

package that comes through that's what

2:12:58

zone that's what zoning gets from

2:12:59

planning.

2:13:00

>> Yeah. So that that'll be again I'll just

2:13:02

say to uh the public um I would

2:13:05

encourage them to pay attention to those

2:13:07

boards and commissions because it's

2:13:09

something that I do because by time

2:13:11

something gets to us you know even

2:13:14

though you guys have a recommendation I

2:13:16

just still want to be able to make a

2:13:17

sound decision on you know moving

2:13:19

forward. So, I would encourage the uh

2:13:21

the public to do as what to to do that

2:13:23

as well. Um because these things are

2:13:25

very important, especially if they're an

2:13:27

applicant looking to get something done

2:13:29

within the city. And the last other

2:13:31

thing I'll only want to recognize, Mr.

2:13:33

Hobbs is here as well from

2:13:35

>> I was going to do that, but thank you.

2:13:37

Mr. Hobbs, who also serves as a member

2:13:41

of the zoning hearing board, is present.

2:13:42

Thank you for

2:13:44

>> Yes, ma'am. Um so, that's all I have and

2:13:46

thank you guys for your service.

2:13:48

Thank you. Thank you very much for your

2:13:51

presence here tonight.

2:13:52

>> Thank you.

2:13:54

>> Our final

2:13:58

No, we have Capitol Region Water. They

2:14:02

aren't outlined on our meeting agenda,

2:14:04

but thank you for coming and we would

2:14:06

appreciate uh you providing an overview

2:14:10

of the Capital Region Water Board.

2:14:12

>> Well, thank you very much uh President

2:14:13

Hill and and fellow city council

2:14:15

members. Uh I stand before the the final

2:14:18

uh important business uh before this

2:14:21

board this evening and I think all of

2:14:22

the media will uh be look kindly upon me

2:14:26

if I'm brief. Uh Capitol Region Water is

2:14:29

a Pennsylvania municipal authority that

2:14:31

provides drinking water, wastewater, and

2:14:33

storm water services for Harrisburg and

2:14:35

parts of surrounding municipalities. The

2:14:38

board of directors governors governs the

2:14:40

authority under the Pennsylvania

2:14:42

Municipal Authorities Act, setting

2:14:44

policy, adopting budgets and rates,

2:14:46

approving capital projects, and

2:14:48

overseeing management to protect the

2:14:50

public health and the environment of the

2:14:52

city of Harrisburg. Our current

2:14:54

membership status uh is that we are

2:14:56

governed by a five member volunteer

2:14:58

board. All five seats are currently

2:15:00

filled with Chairman Karowski and myself

2:15:04

both being on expired terms. Mr. Kowski

2:15:07

as of 2019, myself as of 2020. Three

2:15:11

remaining board members are Karen

2:15:13

Balivan, Shaes Werver, and Pierre McCoy

2:15:17

serving on consecutive expiring terms of

2:15:19

2026, 2027, and 2028.

2:15:24

We meet regularly at 6 PM on the fourth

2:15:27

Wednesday of each month, typically in

2:15:29

November and December. Those are subject

2:15:31

to some change. Uh mostly because of our

2:15:33

budget in November. We're already

2:15:35

starting our budget process uh for 2026.

2:15:39

Our meetings are held at 3003 North

2:15:41

Front Street. They are open to the

2:15:42

public. They're advertised, offered in

2:15:45

person, both uh in person and virtually.

2:15:48

In addition, we record our meetings and

2:15:50

post that to our website. Um typically

2:15:52

within 24 hours after our meetings are

2:15:54

finished. We would love to have folks

2:15:56

visit our meetings. It's very lonely

2:15:59

most uh most months. Our reporting

2:16:02

structure is that capital region water

2:16:04

board members are nominated by the mayor

2:16:07

and appointed uh approved by city

2:16:09

council. Um we are subject to our own

2:16:12

articles and the Pennsylvania municipal

2:16:14

authorities act. Um and we look to be

2:16:17

accountable to not only the city of

2:16:19

Harrisburg but also Pennsylvania

2:16:21

Department of Environmental Protection

2:16:22

and the EPA. Um our public meetings um

2:16:27

we publish our financial reports and our

2:16:30

policies that are adopted by the board

2:16:31

are also published. Um qualifications

2:16:34

for appointment we would typically be

2:16:36

seeking uh certainly enthusiastic

2:16:39

volunteers that have familiarity with

2:16:41

utilities, infrastructure and the

2:16:42

environment. Um finance, law or

2:16:45

government experience. Uh and certainly

2:16:48

community stewardship and a a

2:16:50

stakeholder engagement willingness to

2:16:51

communicate and engage with the public.

2:16:54

That's my overview and thank you so much

2:16:55

for the opportunity to present.

2:16:57

>> Thank you. Thank you very much. Um, as

2:16:59

I've been doing, I will share the formal

2:17:02

reports and advice provided, annual

2:17:05

financial reports and audits submitted

2:17:08

in accordance with the municipality

2:17:10

authorities act shared with the city of

2:17:12

Harrisburg and the Commonwealth.

2:17:15

Regulatory compliance reports are filed

2:17:17

with the Pennsylvania Department of

2:17:19

Environmental Protection and the US

2:17:22

Environmental Protection Agency. And

2:17:24

then public notices and updates, rates,

2:17:28

rate changes, infrastructure projects,

2:17:31

and community impact reports are

2:17:33

provided to residents and businesses

2:17:35

through public meetings and official

2:17:37

publications.

2:17:39

As you noted, uh, the authority is

2:17:42

comprised of five members appointed by

2:17:45

the mayor. The term length is five

2:17:47

years. I don't have any questions, but I

2:17:50

did want to acknowledge the presence of

2:17:53

Miss Charlotte Katzenmeer, the CEO of

2:17:56

Capitol Region Water. Thank you for

2:17:58

being here tonight. Um, I'll open the

2:18:00

floor to my colleagues who may have some

2:18:02

questions for you. I will begin with uh,

2:18:06

Councilwoman Davis. Any questions?

2:18:09

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

2:18:11

I don't have any questions. You already

2:18:13

answered my questions, but thank you for

2:18:14

being here this evening.

2:18:15

>> Thank you.

2:18:17

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

2:18:19

questions?

2:18:19

>> Thank you, President Hill. I don't have

2:18:21

any questions for you. Thank you for

2:18:22

being with us tonight.

2:18:23

>> Thank you, Vice President.

2:18:24

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

2:18:26

questions?

2:18:28

>> No questions for me. Very descriptive. I

2:18:30

appreciate your time. Thank you for

2:18:31

joining us.

2:18:32

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

2:18:34

questions? Well, I'm going to speed up

2:18:36

as everybody else is. So, no, I have no

2:18:39

questions. And how you doing again, Miss

2:18:41

Charlotte? Oh, no. I just want to thank

2:18:43

you guys for uh what you're doing. Um,

2:18:46

actually me and um the the clerk here

2:18:48

had an opportunity to tour Deart uh and

2:18:52

then then the uh the facility down here

2:18:54

on Cameron. Um we also got an

2:18:56

opportunity to do that which um opened

2:18:59

our eyes to a lot of things that I think

2:19:01

you know um you guys are doing some good

2:19:02

things. So,

2:19:03

>> your first uh visit to Deart?

2:19:05

>> Absolutely. And I I was taken back by I

2:19:07

was like, "Wow, this is amazing." Yeah.

2:19:09

I wish more people could go see it. Uh

2:19:12

but I just want to thank you guys for

2:19:13

your work and and the service that

2:19:15

you're providing uh for the city

2:19:16

residents.

2:19:17

>> We have Deart Day coming up very very

2:19:19

shortly. So, it's open to the public and

2:19:20

we're going to be running uh

2:19:22

transportation up to Deart. So,

2:19:24

>> Okay. Get that information to us so we

2:19:26

can report that out. That that'll be

2:19:28

good. I think they uh because that was

2:19:30

one of my biggest things. cuz I always

2:19:31

wanted to know what happened with our

2:19:33

surge water and boy what an experience

2:19:38

but keep up the good work and I thank

2:19:40

you guys.

2:19:42

>> Thank you very much for joining us.

2:19:46

>> Okay, at this time we will open the

2:19:48

floor for public comment. Just a few

2:19:50

housekeeping notes before we begin.

2:19:52

Please state your name and your address

2:19:55

for the meeting record. If you don't

2:19:56

feel comfortable sharing your address,

2:19:58

please share the vicinity in which you

2:20:00

live within the city. You will have four

2:20:01

minutes to share your comments. Mr.

2:20:04

Trudale has added a green timer to the

2:20:09

TV screens for your reference. And I'll

2:20:12

begin to my right. Is there anyone that

2:20:14

would like to offer public comment?

2:20:16

Anything related to the boards and

2:20:18

commissions discussion during the policy

2:20:21

work session?

2:20:26

Good evening, council. I'm going to take

2:20:28

off my um EAC hat and put on my resident

2:20:31

hat. Um my name is Pamela Parson and I

2:20:35

live on Allison Hill. I'd like to thank

2:20:38

you for this really informative uh

2:20:41

program tonight and I hope it gets a lot

2:20:44

of views. I think it's information that

2:20:47

is not often shared especially in this

2:20:50

kind of uh format. I'd also particularly

2:20:54

uh appreciated that Capitol Region Water

2:20:57

was here as a Capital Region Water

2:20:59

Ambassador and also really glad that you

2:21:03

included the redevelopment authority

2:21:06

because authorities as quasi

2:21:08

governmental agencies are often really

2:21:11

hard to figure out how they work. And I

2:21:15

also appreciate um your questions um

2:21:19

especially uh Council Member Green and

2:21:23

Council Member RS about the

2:21:25

redevelopment authority. uh I have found

2:21:27

that it is very difficult for a citizen

2:21:31

to access that particular authority to

2:21:35

find the information that you're looking

2:21:37

for um to even attend a meeting because

2:21:41

the meetings often happen I think at

2:21:43

like 12 or 12:30. It's hard to get

2:21:46

there. It's hard to find the link if you

2:21:49

want to join virtually. And I did a

2:21:52

quick look tonight and in their meetings

2:21:56

from say 2022 to 2025, which is where

2:22:00

they have their minutes available. In

2:22:03

all of those meetings, there were only

2:22:05

five meetings where members of the

2:22:09

public were there and actually asked

2:22:11

questions or made public comment. Um, so

2:22:15

I think that's really important and I'm

2:22:18

glad that you were uh here. I'm glad

2:22:21

that the list of properties might

2:22:25

actually be public. Um I attended one of

2:22:28

their meetings back in 2023

2:22:32

I think and in asking that question

2:22:35

where are is this list of properties and

2:22:39

the question was not clearly answered

2:22:41

when I was there. So, it would be great

2:22:43

that if it would be at the website and

2:22:46

again, thank you very much for this um

2:22:49

session tonight.

2:22:51

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:22:53

right that would like to offer public

2:22:55

comment?

2:22:57

>> Hello. Good evening, council. My name is

2:22:59

Paul Gellerman. I live in the Uptown

2:23:01

area. Um, I had a question just hearing

2:23:03

some of the board structures um and some

2:23:07

of the uh board appointees that have

2:23:09

been appointed by a city council that

2:23:12

might not be participating or fully

2:23:14

engaged with the boards. What what

2:23:17

measures or what power does city council

2:23:19

have to review their performance and

2:23:21

potentially remove them from those

2:23:23

boards?

2:23:26

>> That's a good question. I have not had

2:23:29

any experience of removal of a city

2:23:32

council appointee. I don't know if

2:23:34

that's something that the law bureau can

2:23:36

speak to.

2:23:37

>> So, it's it's going to be different with

2:23:39

each board because each board has its

2:23:41

own what I'd call enabling act.

2:23:43

>> Okay.

2:23:43

>> Um and but most boards the main reason

2:23:46

for a departure is if they have three

2:23:49

unexcused vacancies in a row, the

2:23:52

position can be reported as vacant. Um,

2:23:55

and in some boards you get appointed to

2:23:57

fulfill the remainder of that person's

2:23:59

term. On other boards you're appointed

2:24:02

to a full term. So, it just depends on

2:24:04

the board that you're on. Um, but uh

2:24:07

there is rarely there are provisions in

2:24:09

some of the authorities for removal for

2:24:11

more serious conduct. Um, I'm unaware of

2:24:14

that ever being an issue where there's

2:24:18

actually a conduct kind of question.

2:24:19

It's really about some people just

2:24:21

because they're busy and as a volunteer

2:24:23

just can't get there, you know.

2:24:25

>> Okay. Thank you.

2:24:27

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:24:29

right that would like to offer public

2:24:31

comment?

2:24:35

>> Yes.

2:24:36

>> If you wouldn't mind coming to the

2:24:40

>> to the microphone. Um,

2:24:42

>> if you could please say your name and

2:24:43

your address or

2:24:44

>> say beloved Jesus. I'm 2128 Green

2:24:48

Street. This is my first time I've been

2:24:51

back for a few years. And I know Miss

2:24:53

Green, she knows me. Um my uh one thing

2:24:59

I want to make a complaint that there's

2:25:00

these bumps that are on Division Street

2:25:02

and on Third and Sixth. And I have

2:25:06

electric bike. And I'm going to tell you

2:25:08

what, I'm not a car, but I'm a bike. got

2:25:10

a flat tire because after they did the

2:25:13

bump, there's some gravel and stuff

2:25:16

after it. And then they to do two posts

2:25:18

too after that. So, a bicycle could go

2:25:21

by it. But what the problem is too,

2:25:24

there's cars that will park in front of

2:25:26

those two coasts. So, the bicycle is

2:25:30

going to go over the hump anyway. Okay.

2:25:32

Now, next stopping. Now, my next subject

2:25:34

is the my last time that was at this

2:25:37

market. This this

2:25:40

city council meeting was when I had four

2:25:42

tickets from a family from Africa and

2:25:45

you had a president and she said that

2:25:48

she would take care of those four

2:25:49

tickets.

2:25:51

And guess what? I got a phone call from

2:25:53

the car owners from Pittsburgh that

2:25:57

nothing was ever done on those tickets.

2:25:59

And I come down here and I go to that

2:26:01

office up there and she ain't round but

2:26:04

I'm hollering and I had the secretary

2:26:06

got two of those tickets resolved. I

2:26:08

paid the other two off

2:26:11

and um the last thing was that was

2:26:14

really the last time that I cave came

2:26:17

back down city council until tonight

2:26:21

because she has been nothing more than

2:26:23

totally deceitful. The broad street

2:26:26

market is unbelievable. You get you

2:26:29

donated money in the beginning but where

2:26:31

did the money go? And then I know it

2:26:33

went to the board.

2:26:35

Hello for the Broad Street Market. I've

2:26:38

been in this city for I've been in my

2:26:40

house for 34 years. I know about the

2:26:43

Broad Street Market when it was shut

2:26:45

down for years because of the roaches.

2:26:48

There's many stories, but manage

2:26:50

management is a big issue and the fact

2:26:53

is with her to try to do this big show

2:26:56

that she's been doing to try this into

2:26:59

historic. It's a modern historic in

2:27:02

between the two buildings.

2:27:04

Yoohoo. Come on down. Welcome to Heagen

2:27:08

Harrisburg. My house is from 1886 and I

2:27:12

bought it 30ome years ago and I have

2:27:14

built it from the foundation to the

2:27:16

roof.

2:27:19

Okay? And when I say what I say, if that

2:27:22

boarding would that when that building

2:27:23

burnt, if there would have been some

2:27:25

Christian more

2:27:28

Amish individuals to come around, that

2:27:30

building would have been done in a year

2:27:32

to a year and a half finished

2:27:35

professionally

2:27:36

done in the name of Jesus Christ there.

2:27:40

So there I'm I'm done. I love you all. I

2:27:43

do the Harrisburg Food Ministry right

2:27:45

out of my driveway. I'm 210 Street. They

2:27:48

give me the food there at that little

2:27:50

tent now at the Broad Street Market.

2:27:52

It's more of a blessing I could ever

2:27:54

have. Okay. So, thank you very much.

2:27:57

>> Thank you.

2:27:59

>> Is there anyone else to my right that

2:28:01

would like to offer public comment?

2:28:05

Okay. Seeing and hearing no one. Anyone

2:28:07

in the middle section?

2:28:19

Good evening, council. Um, I'm still

2:28:22

working on the development of the

2:28:24

Cameron Street project. This is the

2:28:26

before and the after.

2:28:30

Um,

2:28:31

we just got before I start, my name is

2:28:34

Libby Profit.

2:28:36

I am resigning at 2025 Chestnut Street

2:28:40

in Harrisburg.

2:28:42

This project is featured on the website

2:28:44

ww.

2:28:48

E

2:28:53

excuse me, so much going on in my head

2:28:55

right now. Capital city. The water is

2:28:57

here.

2:29:03

>> This project is on uh intellect.com.

2:29:08

That's I N T L E Cs.com.

2:29:15

You look at it, you'll see my website.

2:29:18

I'm a consultant and this if you want to

2:29:21

learn more, this project is under there.

2:29:23

We have just uh got some guys to do the

2:29:28

drafts and the design that would

2:29:31

eventually come in front of I guess the

2:29:34

first board would be the uh plan. No,

2:29:37

the historic board. So hopefully we

2:29:39

don't have any issues

2:29:42

with 1321 North Cameron Street and then

2:29:46

it goes up into planning and zoning and

2:29:50

such. So, I wanted the uh the residents

2:29:55

of Harrisburg to know that we are

2:29:57

redeveloping this and um where they can

2:30:00

go to learn about new information.

2:30:04

And as the plans come through, when the

2:30:06

prints come through, I'll upload it so

2:30:08

they can see as well as um a couple of

2:30:12

times in this month, I'll stop by and

2:30:14

I'll do getting signatures from

2:30:17

community. Make sure that you guys get

2:30:19

the black and white

2:30:22

of everything that you need.

2:30:26

So, I wanted to um mention that

2:30:30

I did learn a few things about these

2:30:34

hearing boards.

2:30:37

The redevelopment authority, Mr. Brian

2:30:40

Davis, I emailed him because I'm in the

2:30:43

redevelopment project um business

2:30:46

currently and I did email him yesterday.

2:30:48

I didn't get a response as to how I can

2:30:52

get a hold of the property that I think

2:30:54

several people in this room said that

2:30:56

there is no list but there is a list but

2:30:59

I want I emailed him request and I

2:31:01

didn't get anything but he was here

2:31:02

earlier um

2:31:05

and maybe he'll return my email because

2:31:07

I emailed so many people as far as

2:31:10

Capitol City waters um

2:31:17

their rates are based on national rates.

2:31:19

That's nauseiating knowing that right

2:31:22

around the corner, Saskana and and Sue

2:31:25

Water and all of them rates are much

2:31:28

much less. So they're they're stating

2:31:31

that their rates are based on national

2:31:33

rates. I live in Harrisburg. I do not

2:31:35

want to pay the same rates as the people

2:31:37

living in California. So where they're

2:31:39

getting their data from and they're

2:31:40

doing these rates is totally fraudulent.

2:31:44

The properties they're calling it

2:31:46

leanable. They have a company in New

2:31:49

Jersey that's putting fines and fees on

2:31:51

people's

2:31:53

bills with potential turnoff because

2:31:57

they didn't get access. Some LLC

2:32:00

plumbing company wants access to

2:32:02

people's home and if you don't give them

2:32:04

access, $515.

2:32:06

I know because it's been on my bill and

2:32:08

I currently am pursuing this issue

2:32:12

via the Supreme Court. Thank you for

2:32:14

your um time. Good night.

2:32:19

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else in the

2:32:21

middle section that would like to offer

2:32:23

public comment? Seeing and hearing no

2:32:25

one, anyone to my left? Seeing and

2:32:28

hearing no one, before we adjourn, I

2:32:30

wanted to note that the board's

2:32:32

commission authorities, you might have

2:32:34

seen council members referencing this

2:32:36

document throughout the evening. Um, a

2:32:39

PDF version is available on the city's

2:32:43

website on e-codes under public

2:32:46

documents and then miscellaneous meeting

2:32:49

materials 2025. It's the first link. So,

2:32:53

I'd like to thank uh the city clerk's

2:32:56

office uh Jared Trudale for your hard

2:33:00

work in drafting this document. I know

2:33:03

it was very tedious and you were very

2:33:05

meticulous in ensuring the information

2:33:08

here was accurate and correct. So, thank

2:33:11

you for that. Okay, everyone. The time

2:33:14

is 8:10 p.m. I will entertain a motion

2:33:18

to adjourn our policy work session.

2:33:21

>> So, moved.

2:33:22

>> Second. Thank you. I hope everyone found

2:33:25

this to be an informative uh work

2:33:27

session. That's our goal. And if you

2:33:30

want to reference the document, please

2:33:32

do. Thank you for your attendance

2:33:33

>> and thank you President Hill for this.

2:33:36

This is very good. I think everybody

2:33:38

enjoyed that.

2:33:39

>> Thank you.

2:34:49

Excuse me everyone. We aren't finished

2:34:52

with our business this evening. We do

2:34:54

have a special legislative session.

2:34:59

>> So, I'll give everyone a few minutes to

2:35:01

regroup.

2:35:42

to go right into this special

2:35:44

legislative session rather reluctantly,

2:35:47

but here we are. The time is 8:13 p.m. I

2:35:51

would like to call this special

2:35:53

legislative session to order.

2:35:57

Mr. Trudeell, could you please call the

2:35:59

role?

2:36:03

Miss Daniels,

2:36:07

Miss Davis,

2:36:08

>> present.

2:36:10

>> Miss Green,

2:36:11

>> present.

2:36:12

>> Mr. Jones,

2:36:13

>> here.

2:36:14

>> Miss Rolls.

2:36:21

She's trying to talk. It's green.

2:36:25

Mr. Rodriguez.

2:36:32

Oh, that's on me this time.

2:36:36

>> Sorry, let's do that again.

2:36:38

>> Yep, I got you. Miss Rolls,

2:36:41

>> present. Can you hear me?

2:36:43

>> Yeah. Yep. Thank you. Miss Hill

2:36:45

>> present. Thank you. The invocation will

2:36:48

be led this evening by Councilwoman

2:36:50

Davis, followed by the pledge of

2:36:52

allegiance, which will be led by

2:36:54

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:36:56

>> Thank you, President Hill.

2:37:00

I would like us to take a moment to

2:37:02

honor the life of Pastor D. Gilmore, the

2:37:07

second administrative assistant to the

2:37:10

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Ecclesiastical

2:37:13

Jurisdiction.

2:37:15

He served as the superintendent of the

2:37:18

Harrisburg District and was the pastor

2:37:20

of Mount Calvary Church of God in

2:37:23

Christ.

2:37:25

Pastor Gilmore, 90, son of the late Roy

2:37:29

Gilmore and the late Lahi Williams, was

2:37:32

born in Roxboro, North Carolina. He

2:37:35

received his doctorate of divinity

2:37:37

degree from Emmanuel Baptist University

2:37:42

of Connelly Spring, North Carolina.

2:37:45

Pastor Gilmore transferred from this

2:37:48

earthly life into eternal life on

2:37:51

Thursday, September 25th, 2025

2:37:55

in the UPMC osteopathic hospital.

2:38:00

He was a husband, a father, a pastor,

2:38:03

and spiritual father to many. His legacy

2:38:07

continues through his family, his

2:38:09

church, and the many who learned from

2:38:11

him. Pastor Gilmore exemplified what it

2:38:15

meant to live a life of integrity and

2:38:17

great character. A life that was

2:38:20

well-lived and a race wellrun.

2:38:24

Pastor Gilmore is will be greatly missed

2:38:27

by all who knew him.

2:38:30

And the services will be held this

2:38:34

Friday at 8:00 a.m. through 11 a.m. And

2:38:40

then the funeral will start at 11:00

2:38:43

a.m. and the location will be at Shiloh

2:38:46

Baptist Church on Dair Street. I would

2:38:49

just like us to take a moment to honor

2:38:54

him and um

2:38:59

reflect on his memory.

2:39:04

Thank you.

2:39:07

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. The

2:39:09

Pledge of Allegiance will be led by

2:39:10

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:39:14

>> All rise for the pledge.

2:39:17

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

2:39:20

United States of America and to the

2:39:22

republic for which it stands, one nation

2:39:25

under God, indivisible, with liberty and

2:39:28

justice for all.

2:39:32

Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. We do

2:39:34

not have any communications this

2:39:36

evening.

2:39:38

We will open the floor again for

2:39:40

courtesy of the floor.

2:39:42

Just a few housekeeping notes, the same

2:39:45

notes. Please state your name and your

2:39:47

address for the meeting record. If you

2:39:48

don't feel comfortable sharing your

2:39:50

address, please share the vicinity in

2:39:52

which you live within the city. You will

2:39:54

have four minutes to share your

2:39:56

comments. Mr. Trudale has added the

2:39:58

timer back to the screen for your

2:40:00

reference. I'll begin to my right. Is

2:40:03

there anyone that would like to offer

2:40:05

public comment?

2:40:11

Council

2:40:13

members, uh Bruce Weber, 428 Bow Street.

2:40:17

Just want to uh speak in favor of the

2:40:21

legislation in front of you this

2:40:22

evening. Um obviously the bu rebuild of

2:40:25

the Broad Street Market is key towards

2:40:27

economic development and continued

2:40:30

revitalization of uh the city. Uh and uh

2:40:34

although it's uh been a long and winding

2:40:37

process, hopefully we're finally seeing

2:40:40

a little uh light after the darkness and

2:40:43

uh this uh is important uh for uh you

2:40:48

know important legislation and for your

2:40:51

consideration. And along those lines, I

2:40:53

just want to bring up that I think it's

2:40:56

also potentially a good opportunity to

2:41:00

uh suggest that there may be a funding

2:41:02

gap here as has been discussed. It's

2:41:05

hard to know exactly uh what it is, how

2:41:08

much it is uh and uh uh how big that

2:41:13

delta may be, but uh the city uh

2:41:16

currently um does not have a credit

2:41:19

rating and has not accessed the public

2:41:21

debt market in uh about 27 years I think

2:41:24

at this point. and uh

2:41:28

the city's uh ability to uh secure

2:41:32

funding uh for any uh needs uh that uh

2:41:39

currently they don't have opportunities

2:41:42

to get from other uh sources such as

2:41:45

grants or uh you know uh the typical

2:41:49

revenue sources.

2:41:51

uh

2:41:53

that they really will have to use the

2:41:55

cash that's available in the general

2:41:57

fund of the city. I don't know what that

2:42:00

balance is at this point. Uh but uh you

2:42:04

know once you use cash, it's gone. It's

2:42:06

very hard to reclaim it. So I think

2:42:08

there's an opportunity here to uh

2:42:12

perhaps uh look at going back into the

2:42:14

public market. uh the matching principle

2:42:17

of assets to liabilities. The rebuild of

2:42:20

the market is a building that will uh be

2:42:23

around for 30 plus years. Uh when you

2:42:26

you know uh go to the debt market,

2:42:28

you're talking somewhere between 10 to

2:42:29

30 years. Yes, there is a cost with

2:42:32

interest. Uh but that those costs are

2:42:35

spread out. Uh so in theory even though

2:42:39

this is takes a lot of work and there's

2:42:41

a lot of uh cooperation between uh the

2:42:46

administration uh and council to

2:42:48

facilitate something like this

2:42:50

considering it has not been done in a

2:42:52

while. Uh it it could provide a real

2:42:54

opportunity to do two things at one time

2:42:56

which is both you know show off uh what

2:43:00

can be done uh you know uh with with the

2:43:04

city with some imagination and

2:43:05

creativity with the actually building of

2:43:07

the market and then show that the city's

2:43:10

you know has the financial wherewithal

2:43:12

to actually go back to uh the the public

2:43:15

market uh and secure a credit rating uh

2:43:18

and show that uh you know its economic

2:43:20

vibrancy uh is also there to be uh

2:43:25

highlighted at this at the same time. So

2:43:28

anyways, thank you very much for your

2:43:29

time and uh good luck tonight with the

2:43:32

vote.

2:43:33

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:43:35

right that would like to offer public

2:43:37

comment? Okay, seeing and hearing no

2:43:39

one, anyone in the middle section?

2:43:42

Okay, seeing and hearing no one, anyone

2:43:44

to my left? Seeing and hearing no one,

2:43:47

we will move forward with the meeting

2:43:49

agenda.

2:43:51

Next, approval of minutes. We do not

2:43:54

have any minutes for approval. Next, we

2:43:56

have reports of committees. The sole

2:43:59

committee report you will hear this

2:44:01

evening will be delivered by Vice

2:44:03

President Green on behalf of the budget

2:44:05

and finance committee on the work

2:44:07

session of September 23rd, 2025.

2:44:12

Thank you, President Hill. I will try to

2:44:14

be brief but um still thorough. The

2:44:17

budget and finance committee met during

2:44:19

the work session of September 23rd,

2:44:21

2025. We discussed resolution 63 of

2:44:24

2025, a resolution approving the six

2:44:27

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

2:44:30

related to the rebuild of the Broad

2:44:31

Street Market brick building. We had a

2:44:34

pre presentation from Mr. McCutchen to

2:44:36

go over the proposed budget

2:44:38

reallocation. The total reallocation

2:44:40

request for the Broad Street Market

2:44:41

project is $14,416,912.

2:44:47

This estimate will cover the the entire

2:44:49

estimated cost of completing the Brawl

2:44:51

Street Market brick building and

2:44:52

upgrades. The total estimated cost at

2:44:55

this moment for the project is $19.12

2:44:58

million according to the provided

2:45:00

schedule. The funds for this project are

2:45:03

being reallocated from various general

2:45:04

revenue funds, including $9.1 million

2:45:07

from the cash carryover, also known as

2:45:09

the fund balance. In discussion, Mr.

2:45:12

McCutchen and the city solicitor, uh,

2:45:14

Mr. Neil Grover noted that the amount

2:45:16

received from insurance will likely

2:45:18

increase as they go through the process

2:45:20

of sorting out what category repairs and

2:45:22

upgrades fall into. The solicitor also

2:45:24

noted that this resolution is

2:45:26

time-sensitive as the contracts cannot

2:45:29

be signed or executed until the funds

2:45:31

are made available to fulfill the

2:45:32

contracts. We did request a breakdown

2:45:35

and a presentation of the estimated cost

2:45:37

so that the city council as well as the

2:45:39

public can be informed on what the

2:45:41

estimated work and final project for the

2:45:42

broad street market will look like. City

2:45:45

Council was provided a brief breakdown

2:45:46

of the budget to include what items,

2:45:49

excuse me, what items the funds

2:45:51

requested for

2:45:53

as well as the estimated timelines for

2:45:55

the work to be completed. During

2:45:57

tonight's meeting, I will ask to open

2:45:58

the floor for discussion to see if the

2:46:00

administration would like to present

2:46:01

this information that they provided to

2:46:03

us via email as well as any further

2:46:05

questions from city council. The Broad

2:46:08

Street Market is a pillar of our

2:46:09

community and the residents have been

2:46:11

very vocal. So they want it restored and

2:46:12

upgraded to keep its original historic

2:46:14

charm while bringing modern amenities.

2:46:17

With that being said, we all also must

2:46:19

be cognizant of the city's funds and

2:46:22

understanding the overall cost and its

2:46:23

impact on the city's short and long-term

2:46:25

financial stability is something that we

2:46:27

have to evaluate. As noted last week,

2:46:30

this is a multi-year project that will

2:46:32

run across multiple budget years in

2:46:34

order for the contracts to be executed,

2:46:36

the work um excuse me on for the

2:46:38

contracts to be executed and the work to

2:46:40

be started. The funds have to be made

2:46:42

available. Now, with that being said, if

2:46:45

this resolution would pass tonight, I

2:46:47

would implore the administration to not

2:46:49

only look for other funding sources so

2:46:52

that we do not put a strain on the

2:46:53

city's fund balance, but also ensure

2:46:55

that our budget for the next two years

2:46:57

includes intentional efforts to plus up

2:47:00

our fund balance as we are still in a

2:47:02

position where the city cannot borrow

2:47:03

money for capital need improvement

2:47:05

projects and we don't want to put

2:47:06

ourselves in a positions of not being

2:47:08

able to complete necessary work in the

2:47:10

future. Uh, that concludes my report.

2:47:13

Thank you.

2:47:14

>> Thank you. We do not have any ordinances

2:47:17

for first reading or ordinances for

2:47:20

amendment and there are no ordinances

2:47:22

for final passage for consideration.

2:47:25

Tonight we have resolution 63 of 2025.

2:47:29

Mr. Trudale, could you please read it

2:47:31

into the record?

2:47:33

Resolution 63 2025, a resolution

2:47:37

approving the six proposed 2025 budget

2:47:39

reallocation related to the rebuild of

2:47:41

the Broad Street Market brick building.

2:47:44

>> Thank you. Um I will entertain a motion

2:47:47

to suspend the rules for further

2:47:49

discussion.

2:47:50

>> So move.

2:47:51

>> Is there a second?

2:47:52

>> Second.

2:47:53

>> Thank you. I will defer to our budget

2:47:55

and finance committee chair, Vice

2:47:57

President Green, to lead discussion.

2:48:00

>> Thank you, President Hill. Uh I would

2:48:01

like to ask if there's anyone from the

2:48:03

administration. I know we have uh Mr.

2:48:05

Baker as well as Mr. McCutchen here. Uh

2:48:07

if you would like to come and take a

2:48:09

seat at the table uh and maybe go over

2:48:11

some of the information that you sent to

2:48:13

council over the last day or so. Uh that

2:48:15

kind of goes over this the timeline uh

2:48:18

when we're looking for the market to be

2:48:20

completed. I know you sent some a couple

2:48:22

of renderings. um if you just could

2:48:24

provide any more information on the

2:48:25

project itself, some of the things that

2:48:27

are going to be covered, some of the

2:48:28

upgrades we might be looking to do to

2:48:30

the market and what we're looking for

2:48:31

the final project itself to look like.

2:48:33

Um and Mr. McCutchkins, if you could

2:48:36

provide uh some information more on the

2:48:38

financial side, I know you gave us some

2:48:40

information as to what the the cost

2:48:42

would cover um as far as like specific

2:48:45

materials and things like that. and if

2:48:47

you could also give us just a a brief

2:48:48

standpoint on where the city's fund

2:48:50

balance currently lies so that we can

2:48:52

have that information as we're looking

2:48:54

to dip into it. That was a lot that I

2:48:57

asked for. Hopefully you guys heard all

2:48:58

of it. Um it's it's kind of a long-

2:49:01

winded request for the same request that

2:49:03

I made last week.

2:49:09

>> You want to go first?

2:49:10

>> Whoever would like to start.

2:49:12

>> All right. Uh yes. Good evening, city

2:49:15

council members. Thank you, Brian

2:49:17

McCutchen, accounting manager.

2:49:20

Thank you, Vice President Green, for

2:49:22

that reference for that schedule that I

2:49:25

distributed today as a followup uh for

2:49:30

your request last Tuesday evening.

2:49:33

My efforts here were to try to make it

2:49:36

more concise and a little more

2:49:39

uh a better path to follow as compared

2:49:43

to how I presented last Tuesday with

2:49:45

with line and and and uh line after

2:49:48

line.

2:49:49

>> Just one moment, Mr. McCutchen. Sure.

2:49:51

Mr. Trusa, could you pull it up? Yes.

2:49:56

>> Just so the public can see it as well.

2:49:58

>> I I I appreciate the opportunity to see

2:50:01

my work.

2:50:18

So, I have a print out of the uh

2:50:19

construction timeline. Would that be

2:50:21

beneficial to pass out to you guys right

2:50:23

now or is digital copy sufficient?

2:50:26

>> Um, it it'd be beneficial to print uh

2:50:28

give us a printed copy. I did print a

2:50:30

copy myself, but

2:50:56

Oh, all right. Very good. Uh, so this

2:51:01

this schedule it reflects and it does

2:51:04

tie in to the the re uh the the six

2:51:07

budget reallocation proposed last week.

2:51:10

uh the the totals do reconcile, but what

2:51:13

I was trying to illustrate here is a is

2:51:15

a history of um what's been paid through

2:51:20

the end of um August of of 25. Uh you

2:51:26

can see that column B reflects what

2:51:27

we've paid in 24

2:51:30

including the project construction

2:51:32

manager and the architect. And there

2:51:34

were firms contracted to do for the most

2:51:37

part the these are these firms did

2:51:39

demolition type work. Um in 2025

2:51:44

uh payments through into 2025 through

2:51:47

the end of August mainly it really is

2:51:50

only going to be the the project manager

2:51:52

and and the architect. So as of the end

2:51:55

of August, we still have commitments or

2:51:58

incumbrance balance balances that are

2:52:01

out there and the anticipation is that

2:52:03

they will be liquidated prior to the end

2:52:06

of the year. That's that's an

2:52:07

assumption, but it's it's a reasonable

2:52:09

one.

2:52:10

So, prior to the heavy I'll call them

2:52:13

the heavier construction costs that are

2:52:16

uh that are being currently uh worked

2:52:20

upon and and and and teeing up in our

2:52:22

our incumbrance system and these are

2:52:24

estimates and based on the the the

2:52:28

involved lines for for these heavy

2:52:30

construction cost. So, and and Jared, if

2:52:33

you could just scroll up slightly. Thank

2:52:35

you. So again, where I left off with,

2:52:39

you know, the 3.338

2:52:41

million relates to those vendors up

2:52:43

above. So before we get to the the

2:52:46

construction vendors, so to speak, the

2:52:49

the all all this time that's passed, the

2:52:52

the the the magic number, if you will,

2:52:55

tends to be the 23 plus million in total

2:52:58

cost for this this particular project.

2:53:01

So if you reduce the 23 million by what

2:53:04

we've paid essentially through the end

2:53:05

of this year, that gets us down to the

2:53:08

1969.

2:53:10

And then it's carved out by those lines

2:53:13

uh that are illustrated there. You can

2:53:16

see that. And so that's again an

2:53:20

estimate and it's a high estimate

2:53:21

because there's uh these amounts reflect

2:53:24

any potential contingencies that may

2:53:27

arise. they they may they may not arise

2:53:29

to this level, but it's it's it pertains

2:53:32

to chain change orders. When contractors

2:53:35

start doing work and they go along, they

2:53:36

discover something else needs to be

2:53:38

addressed.

2:53:40

So, with that of 19.693 million, how do

2:53:43

we how does the city address that? Well,

2:53:45

$500,000 has already been appropriated

2:53:48

in the host fee fund. It has not been

2:53:50

utilized yet. So the 19 remaining 19193

2:53:55

that's what we're saying as as these

2:53:58

vendors and these contracts move forward

2:54:00

through the purchasing system of of the

2:54:02

of the city which essentially represents

2:54:04

committing to encumbering

2:54:07

uh uh the balances or encumbering the

2:54:10

budget the available budget. We look at

2:54:12

what's available as of the end of August

2:54:14

and that's the 4,776.

2:54:17

So there's where the difference between

2:54:19

those two is that number that's you've

2:54:21

seen and and referenced the 14.4

2:54:24

million. So that will reconcile back to

2:54:27

the proposed reallocation schedule.

2:54:30

That's the ask the 14.4 million to

2:54:33

increase the city's general fund budget

2:54:35

up to the 19.193.

2:54:38

That's that's that's the only expense

2:54:40

line that that was appearing on that

2:54:42

schedule for Broad Street Market. The

2:54:44

rest of the lines that flow below which

2:54:46

are not reflected here. I didn't want to

2:54:48

recmplicate things just how what what

2:54:52

are the revenue sources that are

2:54:53

available

2:54:55

uh to accommodate such an increase in

2:54:57

general fund budget expense.

2:55:00

Um

2:55:03

and that's completes that that schedule

2:55:06

summarized up uh for you. If you have

2:55:08

any comments or questions, I'd be happy

2:55:11

to try to answer for you.

2:55:15

I don't have any questions on this

2:55:16

schedule. Does I will start to my far

2:55:18

left.

2:55:20

>> No, I'll start to my far right.

2:55:22

Councilwoman Davis.

2:55:24

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Good

2:55:26

evening. I'm going to hold off on my

2:55:29

questions. Okay.

2:55:31

>> Thank you.

2:55:32

>> Thank you, President Hill.

2:55:34

>> Yes. I'm going to read uh questions from

2:55:37

an email that was received last

2:55:39

Wednesday following last Tuesday's uh

2:55:44

council meeting.

2:55:48

As a longtime Harrisburg resident and

2:55:50

taxpayer, I care deeply about the broad

2:55:53

street market and and about how the city

2:55:56

manages large public expenditures. After

2:55:59

reviewing the six proposed 2025 budget

2:56:03

reallocation adjustment that was

2:56:06

presented to council, I was struck by

2:56:08

how difficult it is for an ordinary

2:56:10

citizen to follow where the money for

2:56:12

this restoration is actually coming from

2:56:15

and whether the sources are secured. I'm

2:56:18

asking that you please forward the

2:56:21

following concerns to members of city

2:56:23

council so they can be addressed

2:56:24

publicly. From my reading of the

2:56:27

spreadsheet, the amendment increases the

2:56:29

Broad Street Market Fire Loss

2:56:31

Restoration budget by over $14 million,

2:56:35

but the listed transfers in transfers in

2:56:39

insurance reimbursements and grant lines

2:56:42

don't clearly add up to that amount. The

2:56:44

estimated cash carryover jumps by more

2:56:47

than $9 million, and one of the CDBG

2:56:51

transfer lines even shows a negative

2:56:53

year-to-ate revenue figure. There there

2:56:57

also aren't subtotals or notes

2:56:59

explaining each line, which makes it

2:57:01

hard to tell what's confirmed versus

2:57:04

what's anticipated.

2:57:06

Because of that, I'm hoping council can

2:57:08

clarify, among other things. First, how

2:57:11

many how exactly does the $14.4 million

2:57:15

amendment reconcile with the transfers,

2:57:18

grants, and reimbursements listed in the

2:57:20

spreadsheet?

2:57:23

>> Do you want to answer? I have a series

2:57:25

of questions.

2:57:26

>> Okay.

2:57:28

Um, so back back to that schedule that

2:57:32

we reviewed last week. Mhm.

2:57:35

>> So the the starting point is the

2:57:37

14,416,000

2:57:40

increase to expense. Um the rest of the

2:57:43

lines underneath that are all revenue

2:57:45

increases

2:57:48

in each one of the revenue lines within

2:57:50

the general fund. Um I can go line by

2:57:54

line if you like me to at this point.

2:57:58

>> I think that's what the request is

2:58:00

because he noted that

2:58:04

Yes, the the lines clearly didn't add up

2:58:07

to a certain amount and then that there

2:58:11

weren't subtotals or notes explaining

2:58:13

each line. So, if you could please

2:58:15

>> Okay. Um

2:58:19

Okay. Yeah. Thank you, Jared.

2:58:23

So, let me f let me show uh shift to

2:58:25

column H which is I believe the

2:58:29

what what the questions are referring to

2:58:32

which is the proposed budget amendment

2:58:35

request.

2:58:39

So the expense of 14.4 is funded by all

2:58:43

the lines that appear below. In other

2:58:45

words, if we would sum all the lines

2:58:48

below the 14.4 million, they would

2:58:52

perfectly add up to that same number.

2:58:56

Um

2:58:58

now the insurance reimbursement for loss

2:59:01

uh in in this year's appropriated budget

2:59:04

the city originally anticipated 4.5

2:59:08

million in insurance proceeds from the

2:59:11

carrier. So this request is adding an

2:59:14

additional 1.287 287 million to that

2:59:18

taking it up. Uh we're and you can see

2:59:22

what the available amount is over on uh

2:59:25

column column I.

2:59:28

But that is the the the anticipation for

2:59:31

an acceleration of cost which the city's

2:59:33

in in the process right now of

2:59:36

forwarding to the insurance carrier for

2:59:39

for reimbursement.

2:59:42

It's not the full amount of the

2:59:43

proceeds, but It's an increase to that

2:59:45

line from 4.5 million. Uh the next line

2:59:49

down is the the CDBG funds managed by

2:59:53

the building and housing department.

2:59:55

There's been a commitment of $1 million.

2:59:58

And

3:00:00

there's actually the the the reason for

3:00:02

the possible confusion about what the

3:00:04

questioner said about a negative. The

3:00:07

city has already started to transfer

3:00:10

money from the CDBG fund over to the

3:00:12

general fund. If you look at column F,

3:00:15

the that's the actual like what what has

3:00:18

actually occurred thus far this year

3:00:20

through the end of August. 418,000 means

3:00:23

we've already transferred from the CDBG

3:00:26

fund into the general fund. So, but that

3:00:30

line you'll note in column E, there's no

3:00:34

currently adopted budget. So, it wasn't

3:00:36

naturally it wasn't anticipated at the

3:00:39

beginning of the year. So, it's being

3:00:41

requested now. We've already received,

3:00:44

we've already transferred $418,000. The

3:00:46

max the currently maximum amount

3:00:49

available for the commitment is $1

3:00:50

million.

3:00:52

So when you compare the two, the 1

3:00:55

million gets the budget in the system.

3:00:58

It gets it there. And then the remaining

3:01:01

amount in column I just just reflects

3:01:05

that you know already actual is 418. The

3:01:09

budget will will appear at a million.

3:01:11

So, there'll be another $581,000

3:01:13

to go before the end of the year. And

3:01:16

and that line is based on what the

3:01:17

city's been paying to the architect.

3:01:22

>> Thank you. The next question is, for

3:01:25

each transfer in line, where is the

3:01:28

transfer out in the originating fund and

3:01:31

has it already been authorized by

3:01:33

council or another governing body?

3:01:37

Um the uh C council has not yet

3:01:42

authorized what's uh has been in in the

3:01:45

proposed column in in in column H for

3:01:47

the transfers.

3:01:49

Um

3:01:51

let me start with uh the capital

3:01:53

projects fund which is $825,000.

3:01:56

And again this was not in the city's

3:01:58

original

3:02:00

uh budget for 2025.

3:02:03

If you Jared, if you scroll down a

3:02:06

little bit

3:02:08

right there, okay, you can see uh the

3:02:12

third line down is capital projects

3:02:15

public works. That's the transfer out.

3:02:17

Now, that's only $375,000,

3:02:21

but the the difference of um it would be

3:02:27

400

3:02:29

$450,000

3:02:31

that there's two components to this. One

3:02:33

is the city's the hotel tax revenue that

3:02:35

comes in and also the street cut revenue

3:02:38

that uh is is realized.

3:02:42

Both of those revenue items are recorded

3:02:44

and deposited to the capital projects

3:02:46

fund, but the street cut money is of a

3:02:51

public works function and actually count

3:02:55

uh the city's appropriation for for this

3:02:58

year includes the public works function

3:03:00

side. Um the hotel tax money

3:03:04

uh consistent with the past is not an

3:03:07

appropriation because it simply comes

3:03:10

into the capital projects fund and then

3:03:12

we transfer it to the general fund which

3:03:15

is an appropriated revenue line item.

3:03:17

So, what making making this a shorter

3:03:21

story, we're increasing the the draw on

3:03:24

hotel tax

3:03:26

by $450,000, which is again it's uh that

3:03:31

that particular expenditure out of the

3:03:33

capital projects fund is not included in

3:03:35

the original bud budget ordinance,

3:03:37

consistent with the past. But the

3:03:39

375,000 is street cut money and again

3:03:42

that's in addition to what we would

3:03:44

normally utilize. that is part of the

3:03:47

public works function which is included

3:03:51

uh in this fund and is also included in

3:03:53

the original budget ordinance this year.

3:03:56

So the three the 37 or uh yes the 375

3:03:59

and and and the 450 make up the eight

3:04:01

and a quarter coming from the the

3:04:04

capital projects fund.

3:04:07

Um the next line down, if I may, the the

3:04:11

the blight remediation fund, uh original

3:04:14

appropriation this year was $100,000.

3:04:17

That is in the budget ordinance, and

3:04:20

that was meant to be a transfer to both

3:04:22

neighborhood services and the general

3:04:24

fund at 50,000.

3:04:27

I'm sorry, one was at 75,000, the other

3:04:29

one was at 25K.

3:04:32

So, we're adding $100,000 specifically

3:04:35

for the Broad Street Market

3:04:38

uh uh project. And you can see that the

3:04:42

in the blight fund down below under

3:04:44

other funds, there's there's two budget

3:04:46

units to accommodate that, the salvage

3:04:49

budget unit and the permit penalty.

3:04:52

So,

3:04:54

uh again, you can see the the split

3:04:56

there. The original appropriation for

3:04:58

for this year is meant for something

3:05:01

else for neighborhood services and

3:05:02

general fund, but now we're adding

3:05:04

$100,000 $50,000 each for those

3:05:07

particular expense lines in the blight

3:05:10

fund. So that's how and and the

3:05:12

transfers have yet to happen on what was

3:05:13

originally appropriated this year for

3:05:16

general fund and neighborhood services.

3:05:18

So doing the math with the $50,000

3:05:21

increases on each line, you can see what

3:05:23

ends up being available,

3:05:25

125 and 75 respectively for salvage and

3:05:29

penalty. But focusing back on Broad

3:05:32

Street, the the transfer out below the

3:05:34

250s 50K

3:05:37

uh equate to the $100,000 coming in to

3:05:40

the general fund from the blight

3:05:42

remediation fund. So that gets us

3:05:44

through that row. uh of the 100,000

3:05:48

coming from the blight fund.

3:05:54

Okay. Um the next line down is the state

3:05:57

grants fund and uh a large part of this

3:06:02

pertains to interest income that's been

3:06:05

generating

3:06:06

uh not direct in well not directly from

3:06:10

the American Rescue Plan Act funds as

3:06:13

you recall

3:06:15

that was um received into the federal

3:06:19

grants fund uh because it is it is a

3:06:22

federal sourced grant in in nature

3:06:25

resource. Um there were payments out of

3:06:28

that fund directly made and then the

3:06:32

40 plus million dollars was transferred

3:06:35

to the general fund as revenue

3:06:36

replacement

3:06:38

which is in compliance with uh the the

3:06:41

federal treasury government or or the

3:06:44

the the treasury portal when it when it

3:06:46

comes to handling managing and and

3:06:48

classifying that activity. Then council

3:06:51

came back, the mayor and council came

3:06:53

back with the various um economic

3:06:57

activities, programs, initiatives that

3:07:00

were funded

3:07:02

uh in in pieces, but then uh they were

3:07:06

funded by way of transferring the money

3:07:08

out of the general fund over to the the

3:07:10

grants fund, the state grants fund.

3:07:14

My my point on this is that money uh has

3:07:16

been transferred but a large piece of it

3:07:18

has been sitting for an extended period

3:07:20

as these projects unwind and and and

3:07:23

generate uh resulting activity. Along

3:07:26

the way, a significant amount of

3:07:28

interest income has been generated

3:07:29

within the in the grants fund. And

3:07:32

unlike

3:07:34

typically when it comes to interest

3:07:35

income on federal money, you you

3:07:37

sometimes more than you don't have to

3:07:40

return that money to the federal

3:07:41

government. the city does not that can

3:07:44

be uh that that money is good for the

3:07:46

city to keep and there's also a there's

3:07:49

no restriction on how it gets used. So

3:07:52

that 1.663

3:07:54

million uh approximately 1.3 million of

3:07:57

it represents what we estimate the

3:08:00

available accumulated interest income to

3:08:02

be that would be available to

3:08:04

accommodate uh and help the Broad Street

3:08:07

Market project.

3:08:11

Um there are other uh state uh grant

3:08:16

funding sources that represent amounts

3:08:18

that are that have previously been due

3:08:20

to the general fund. In other words,

3:08:23

there's been outlays made by the general

3:08:26

fund uh where there's a grant involved

3:08:30

but it's a reimbursement grant. So the

3:08:32

city had to fund upfront and then submit

3:08:35

to the grtor to be reimbursed wi-i which

3:08:37

has occurred and then that money comes

3:08:39

back to the grants fund waiting to be

3:08:42

transferred to the general fund which uh

3:08:44

there are a few programs that that just

3:08:46

has not happened yet. But we can do that

3:08:49

and also call that a a new revenue

3:08:53

resource for current year because it's

3:08:55

not in the original appropriation this

3:08:57

year.

3:09:00

That's the state grants fund. The next

3:09:02

line is is almost it is the identical

3:09:04

explanation. It's the federal grants

3:09:06

fund uh m much much lower. There are

3:09:11

uh similar grant uh related funds that

3:09:14

are due to the general fund again from

3:09:16

previous outlays made by the general

3:09:18

fund and and the general fund needs to

3:09:20

be and should be reimbursed. Um, one of

3:09:23

these for the federal grants fund, I'd

3:09:26

say about 75% of that 412,000

3:09:29

is comprised of a COVID 19 grant of

3:09:34

about $161,000

3:09:36

that occurred.

3:09:38

Uh, it was a there was a match portion

3:09:40

that came in relative to uh what the

3:09:43

city had spent for the HVAC project uh

3:09:47

for the public safety building.

3:09:50

And there's another piece that involves

3:09:52

police in u which is a federal program

3:09:54

al alcohol tobacco and fire which

3:09:57

relates to uh police overtime hours that

3:09:59

when they submit periodically

3:10:02

uh the city can be uh reimbursed for for

3:10:06

such activity. So again there's been a

3:10:08

buildup of such uh amounts that have

3:10:11

happened within the grant the federal

3:10:12

grants fund that are due back to the

3:10:14

general fund.

3:10:17

So when you add all those up, the 14.4

3:10:21

million less what I just went through,

3:10:23

we're still coming up with a gap of

3:10:26

9.128 million. And this relates back to

3:10:31

the city has to uh ree not re-evaluate

3:10:35

but evaluate its cash position uh to see

3:10:38

what the potential is, what the effect

3:10:40

or impact would be. And uh you President

3:10:44

Hill, you you you mentioned about the

3:10:46

the current cash balance of of the city.

3:10:49

Um through today, we we we don't have

3:10:53

revenue posted through today, but I can

3:10:57

I can uh estimate that right now we're

3:11:01

somewhere around uh between 19 million

3:11:04

and 19.5 million. That's as of the end

3:11:07

of end of September

3:11:09

in cash fund balance for the general

3:11:11

fund.

3:11:16

>> Okay. Few more questions. Are you okay?

3:11:19

>> Um I think you just mentioned this, but

3:11:21

I just want to clarify. What explains

3:11:24

the sudden $9.1 million increase in

3:11:27

estimated cash carryover? Was there an

3:11:30

audited surplus, a reclassification, or

3:11:33

some other adjustment?

3:11:37

this is the result of uh not being able

3:11:41

to produce another viable revenue

3:11:44

source.

3:11:46

Um so those lines below the 14 million

3:11:49

all represent just that trying to

3:11:53

uh develop or manage what is available

3:11:56

what can be utilized to help fund the

3:12:00

the budget increase. So you again that

3:12:04

that's where we were as far as

3:12:08

uh brainstorming if you will what what

3:12:11

what what what the potential funding

3:12:13

sources which include as I mentioned you

3:12:15

know a big chunk of this is CDBG

3:12:20

insurance earnings

3:12:22

um

3:12:24

I'm sorry in interest earnings and then

3:12:27

the the the the uh potential insurance

3:12:31

reimbursement

3:12:33

But again, it comes down to after you've

3:12:36

uh exhausted that yourself on on what

3:12:40

are are some solutions revenue-wise,

3:12:42

then this is this is what we get to as

3:12:44

far as a a bottom line gap.

3:12:49

>> Thank you. Has the additional $1.28 28

3:12:53

million in insurance reimbursement been

3:12:56

formally awarded or is it an estimate

3:12:59

pending settlement?

3:13:02

>> Um, it would it it would be an estimate

3:13:04

and it would be pending because the way

3:13:08

it would work is and the city's in

3:13:10

process right now of doing uh submitting

3:13:14

information. We we have already

3:13:16

submitted information to the insurance

3:13:18

carrier and I believe they reviewed a

3:13:22

significant amount of payments already

3:13:23

made and now they're they're asking for

3:13:25

proof of payment cancel check images if

3:13:28

if you will. Um the the total estimate

3:13:32

of insurance

3:13:34

that we have which kind of goes it kind

3:13:36

of dubtales with the total estimate of

3:13:38

the overall project cost of over 23

3:13:41

million is 11.7 million in total. And

3:13:45

again that's that's an estimate. Um, and

3:13:49

then you can take $1 million right off

3:13:51

the top of that because that that $1

3:13:53

million is specifically meant for cost

3:13:57

related to what the city has done to

3:13:59

accommodate the temporary site.

3:14:02

So, it has to be it has to be looked

3:14:03

upon or classified in that way. So, that

3:14:07

brings us down to say 10.7 million that

3:14:10

would be

3:14:11

uh available in insurance proceeds. And

3:14:15

it's also good to know or bear in mind

3:14:16

that the city has received insurance

3:14:18

proceeds previously which happened in

3:14:21

2023. Uh not quite $5 million has

3:14:25

already been received. So if you think

3:14:27

about actually I'm glad that came to

3:14:29

mind because that is already if if you

3:14:33

can look at it this way you can

3:14:35

characterize as already sitting in this

3:14:37

the city's cash fund balance. So that

3:14:41

increase of uh of 9.1 million would

3:14:44

would in effect include what has already

3:14:47

been received. You you can view it that

3:14:49

way.

3:14:50

Um

3:14:57

>> okay.

3:14:59

are

3:14:59

>> so council president, I will note that

3:15:01

at least the questions as framed

3:15:04

are using different terms than are used

3:15:07

in the city's budget and and bookkeeping

3:15:09

process. So, for example, that's not a

3:15:12

settlement that he just just referred to

3:15:14

in that question. I know you're reading

3:15:16

it. I'm just saying but the language of

3:15:18

the finance office, the language of the

3:15:21

of the business office, the language of

3:15:24

the law bureau will be different

3:15:26

>> and and this is to make apples apples

3:15:30

equal apples, you have to sort of get to

3:15:31

the same vocabulary.

3:15:34

>> Okay. Well, I just have a few more

3:15:36

questions. Are the state and federal

3:15:38

grant transfers fully awarded and under

3:15:41

contract now or are they projections? Is

3:15:45

that a clear question?

3:15:46

>> They are not awards. They are fund

3:15:49

balance numbers. They're different funds

3:15:51

in the city, right? So that's where

3:15:53

funds went into that's the name of the

3:15:55

city funds. I think one of the things

3:15:57

that gets lost in translation is that

3:16:00

when the city for example presents a

3:16:02

budget every November and you see let's

3:16:06

pick any align item. This is the revenue

3:16:08

number for the next year. This is the

3:16:11

projected expenditures. that is not all

3:16:13

the money in that fund. That fund is

3:16:16

balance that is not being proposed to be

3:16:19

spent above the number. And so that's

3:16:22

where it so that so it's not the same

3:16:24

thing as the audit of the of all the

3:16:27

books. It's a budget and that's why

3:16:28

they're two different things. So these

3:16:31

are funds and if you remember the B the

3:16:33

budget has a series of funds just like

3:16:35

the general fund, the host fund, the

3:16:36

transfer fund, the state grant fund,

3:16:38

they have numbers in them of a of an

3:16:41

outstanding balance that is there which

3:16:43

when they're accumulated a significant

3:16:46

portion of them go to what is called the

3:16:47

fund balance, you know, and Mr. McCussen

3:16:50

can speak to that. So what's really

3:16:52

happening is you are transferring money

3:16:54

that was not encumbered in 2025 that's

3:16:57

in the fund balance regardless of which

3:16:59

category it's in and being asked to add

3:17:02

that to expenditures in 2025 that were

3:17:05

not budgeted at the time the budget was

3:17:07

adopted. It's not the money wasn't

3:17:09

there, it's the money was not budgeted.

3:17:11

And so these aren't where people are

3:17:13

making assumptions of what the what the

3:17:15

what the categories are. These aren't

3:17:18

we're waiting for this federal grant.

3:17:19

We're waiting for a state grant. These

3:17:21

are balances we retain in those those

3:17:25

fund names that are in that have been

3:17:28

designated for the city. So I'm ju just

3:17:30

just for clarity of what they are. I

3:17:32

mean and I think it is hard to

3:17:33

understand but but the sometimes a label

3:17:37

does not is not what it sounds like.

3:17:39

>> Okay. Well, I'll just read the rest of

3:17:42

these questions since there's different

3:17:44

vocabulary for everyone. Um, what is the

3:17:48

timeline for actually receiving these

3:17:50

funds relative to contractor bidding and

3:17:53

construction? And what is the backup

3:17:55

plan if some of them are delayed or

3:17:58

denied?

3:17:59

Why does the CDBG transfer line show a

3:18:02

negative year-to-ate revenue of negative

3:18:06

$418,77?

3:18:09

Is that a posting error, a refer

3:18:13

reversal, or something else? Will

3:18:16

council or staff provide subtotals

3:18:19

showing total inflows and outflows for

3:18:21

this amendment so the public can see

3:18:23

that it balances? Can each line be

3:18:26

accompanied by a brief note or

3:18:29

supporting document, grant award

3:18:31

letters, insurance payout confirmations,

3:18:35

interfer authorizations, council

3:18:38

resolutions so citizens can verify that

3:18:41

the revenue is real.

3:18:43

If any of the listed sources are

3:18:46

contingent or speculative, which ones

3:18:49

are guaranteed and which ones are not?

3:18:52

Finally, what oversight mechanisms will

3:18:54

ensure that once these funds are

3:18:56

transferred, they are spent solely on

3:18:59

the Broad Street Market restoration as

3:19:02

described. These questions all stem

3:19:04

directly from the figures in the

3:19:06

spreadsheet, which you all can see. I'm

3:19:08

not opposing the restoration project. I

3:19:11

want it to succeed. But I believe

3:19:13

transparency on the funding sources will

3:19:16

build public trust and help council make

3:19:19

the most responsible decision. Thank you

3:19:22

for helping to provide clarity on this

3:19:24

important budget matter. I don't have

3:19:27

any other questions for Mr. McCutchen.

3:19:33

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

3:19:36

questions?

3:19:39

>> Um, good evening. Um, no, I don't have

3:19:41

any questions. Mine were all the same as

3:19:44

uh President um Hill's questions were.

3:19:47

Thank you.

3:19:49

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

3:19:51

questions for Mr. McCutchen?

3:19:56

>> Uh, yes. Thank you. Um, thank you for

3:19:58

joining us. Uh, Director Baker, Mr.

3:20:01

McCuten, um, Mr. Brian, you had said the

3:20:06

$500,000 initially, that appropriation,

3:20:08

where did that come from again?

3:20:12

>> That would be uh Councilman Rodri

3:20:16

Rodriguez, I think you're referring to

3:20:17

what's already been appropriated out of

3:20:19

the host fee, host municipalities fee

3:20:22

fund.

3:20:24

>> And then the 375 that came from street

3:20:27

cut money, correct?

3:20:28

>> Oh,

3:20:29

um,

3:20:31

yes. 37 375 would be additional street

3:20:34

cuts funds and then the other piece to

3:20:38

that out of the capital projects fund is

3:20:40

the hotel tax additional draw which

3:20:43

would be 420 I'm sorry $450,000

3:20:48

additional hotel tax money to to draw

3:20:50

from that fund.

3:20:55

>> Okay. All right. Um

3:20:58

I definitely may have further questions.

3:21:00

I'm just trying to kind of puzzle some

3:21:02

things together. Um but but that's all

3:21:04

for right now. Thank

3:21:06

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones.

3:21:08

>> Uh thank you, Vice President Green, and

3:21:10

um thank you guys for showing up

3:21:12

tonight. Um I really don't have any

3:21:14

questions. I just want to, you know, put

3:21:16

my stance on on record. Um you know, uh

3:21:21

when we first did this and we looked at

3:21:22

this, I had a lot of questions about the

3:21:24

money, the transfer ins, the transfer

3:21:26

outs, how everything's e equaled up. And

3:21:29

Mr. Mr. McCussen, you did a wonderful

3:21:30

job of explaining to me what what those

3:21:33

things look like. Um but though for for

3:21:35

for the public's clarification, um even

3:21:38

as we heard public comment from Mr.

3:21:39

Weber tonight, um my concerns are the

3:21:42

same and I I'm very concerned about this

3:21:44

project. Um this is a lot of money

3:21:46

that's being moved with such a large gap

3:21:49

and without any concrete um way that

3:21:54

we're going to see this money come back

3:21:56

into the city. Um and and and again,

3:21:59

we're using cash. Um once this money is

3:22:02

gone, it's gone. I'm just a little

3:22:04

concerned. I will be voting in favor for

3:22:07

this, but I just want to put on record

3:22:09

what what my stance is on it. I am very

3:22:12

worried about seeing how um and I know a

3:22:15

lot of things were mentioned tonight. At

3:22:17

the end of the day, this is a lot of

3:22:18

money going out of the city. Um and and

3:22:20

and that's just my concern. So, um

3:22:23

that's all I have. No question. But if

3:22:25

you have something to give back, that's

3:22:26

fine.

3:22:27

>> Okay.

3:22:30

Oh, yeah. And now this may help. This

3:22:34

might help. Um,

3:22:38

let's just uh say as an example that the

3:22:42

project would would get completed by the

3:22:44

end of this year. We know that's not

3:22:45

going to happen. Project would be

3:22:47

completed

3:22:49

all

3:22:52

No, no pressure, Dave. Um

3:22:56

the um

3:22:59

all the invoices would come in, they

3:23:00

would all be paid. Cash cash out the

3:23:02

door. Okay. The all the transfers would

3:23:05

would would happen to come into play.

3:23:08

What would be the end result? The city

3:23:10

would pay 9.128 million from its cash

3:23:14

fund balance. Also assuming that the

3:23:16

insurance money would materialize.

3:23:19

the only the only line on this schedule

3:23:24

uh really that's of a uh I guess more of

3:23:28

a uh

3:23:30

an outlying uh estimate would be the

3:23:32

insurance funds because that's based on

3:23:35

timing and you know the the city would

3:23:38

be at the will of the insurance carrier

3:23:40

providing the proceeds but again you

3:23:43

know the project costs the uh the the

3:23:47

the

3:23:49

U heavy construction costs that are

3:23:50

already out being uh vetted right now

3:23:54

are are estimates and they're estimated

3:23:57

on the somewhat high end because they do

3:23:59

include contingencies which is always a

3:24:01

reasonable thing to to think about when

3:24:03

when you're planning cost expenditure on

3:24:06

a project. So

3:24:09

is that a huge hit? Obviously it is to

3:24:11

to the city's cash fund balance. It's

3:24:13

not the norm. But one thing that we've

3:24:16

we've mentioned and and maybe I need to

3:24:18

repeat it again. This is to and Dave I

3:24:22

know can comment more uh intelligently

3:24:24

on this. This is uh roughly an 18-month

3:24:28

project. You have the last quarter of

3:24:31

this year. You have all of next year and

3:24:33

and the early part of 2027.

3:24:35

So if you think about that, our payments

3:24:38

aren't going to be all bunched up

3:24:40

happening at the end of this year. It's

3:24:42

going to be over that same time frame.

3:24:44

And we've we've we've tried to gauge

3:24:47

that percentage-wise. And that's that's

3:24:50

another estimate, you know, figuring

3:24:52

maybe save 40% this year to handle

3:24:55

upfront heavier cost, 45% next year, and

3:24:58

then maybe 15% in 2027. But that all

3:25:02

reflects the the cash flow. It's not all

3:25:05

going to happen in in in 2025.

3:25:08

And I think what this means then, and

3:25:11

this comes back to budgeting uh for next

3:25:14

year's budget,

3:25:16

it's important,

3:25:18

more important than ever now, to really

3:25:21

to focus on what the city's normal

3:25:24

recurring revenue is. uh when you think

3:25:27

about all the all all the regular stuff

3:25:30

so to speak and you back out all the

3:25:32

extraordinary items whether it's uh you

3:25:35

know interest income that's so

3:25:36

significant from the grants fund,

3:25:38

insurance money, um anything that's not

3:25:42

the norm and you use that as a as a

3:25:45

guide or a base to build your budget.

3:25:47

Well, now our budget has to be built

3:25:49

upon built upon what is going to be

3:25:51

anticipated next year for this

3:25:53

particular project. It's not an add-on.

3:25:56

It's it becomes a it becomes a a heart

3:25:58

piece of of the city's proposed budget

3:26:01

for next year. So, I think those are

3:26:04

guide rails to manage our way through

3:26:07

this and in in dealing with uh our

3:26:10

revenues uh you know the timeline of

3:26:13

this project which again is is 18 months

3:26:16

roughly. Um, and then also to uh uh

3:26:19

build a budget that's that reflects what

3:26:23

what this extraordinary uh event

3:26:25

represents. And I'll I'll stop right

3:26:28

there if Dave wants to comment.

3:26:30

>> Just just again um I understand all of

3:26:32

that. It's not a bulk of money going out

3:26:34

the window in one swoop. I I I get that.

3:26:38

It's just the concern of it when it's

3:26:40

coming back. Um my question to Mr.

3:26:43

Grover would be um there was a there was

3:26:47

a time where the the insurance lapsed at

3:26:50

the Broad Street Market,

3:26:52

>> not the city's insurance, the

3:26:53

association's assurance was lapsed at

3:26:55

the time of the fire.

3:26:56

>> Okay. How does that

3:26:57

>> insurance was always there?

3:26:59

>> How would that affect insurance revenue?

3:27:01

I mean money coming back.

3:27:02

>> There is no revenue anticipated from the

3:27:04

policy that lapsed. There is no

3:27:06

insurance from that policy that the

3:27:08

association had. All the cities, the

3:27:10

city has a bundled at the time, building

3:27:12

insurance, which is if you're hear like

3:27:14

a fleet policy for vehicles, we had that

3:27:16

for buildings. So they took the

3:27:18

valuation of every structure we had,

3:27:20

came to a number way back when, and said

3:27:23

that is your coverage. Now, you still

3:27:25

have to qualify, but there's so there's

3:27:27

plenty of coverage, right? Plenty of

3:27:30

coverage. It's it's got to qualify as

3:27:32

bringing the building back to its

3:27:34

condition at the time of the fire.

3:27:36

>> Yeah. So

3:27:36

>> before you before you go far on because

3:27:39

uh you I don't want you to get away from

3:27:41

what I'm what I'm asking.

3:27:42

>> I got you. No, just

3:27:44

>> um so even though that's being said, we

3:27:47

still have we don't know what we're

3:27:49

going to receive back.

3:27:50

>> So a good faith estimate of what the

3:27:53

additional monies will get back and

3:27:55

again this is

3:27:57

I would I would suggest this is in favor

3:27:59

of the insurance company as the city is

3:28:01

6.5 to7 million. the business side is

3:28:04

that we think a whole lot more of this

3:28:06

work qualifies under the terms of that

3:28:09

policy. So, and that's where the

3:28:12

argument is going to be. After you get

3:28:13

to about $6.5 million, the rest of the

3:28:16

coverage we get back is going to be and

3:28:19

that's why we had brought in people at

3:28:20

the beginning to go through this with us

3:28:23

to show that it qualifies under the subp

3:28:25

parts of the policy. So, that we

3:28:28

anticipate I think at a minimum six and

3:28:30

a half coming back. We're pushing for a

3:28:32

whole lot more coming back, but there's

3:28:34

no guarantee.

3:28:35

>> And that's that's where I'm I'm I'm I'm

3:28:38

uncomfortable because we don't we don't

3:28:40

know where that's if if that's going to

3:28:43

happen being that even when some of

3:28:45

these no longer American Rescue Plan

3:28:47

funds are spent. Um the budget's going

3:28:51

to drop. Our budget's going to drop down

3:28:54

from where it's at right now. And and

3:28:56

what what monies do we have coming in

3:28:58

that can help fill some of these things?

3:29:00

Again I just want to again I don't want

3:29:02

to

3:29:02

>> may I just interpret put the context to

3:29:05

that I think the questions then become

3:29:07

what historically for the last say five

3:29:09

years is our average fund balance after

3:29:12

the budget after the budget is there

3:29:14

when we project revenues what's left how

3:29:17

much of that is being taken here and

3:29:19

then what is the projection for the fund

3:29:20

balance at the end of 2025 the end of

3:29:24

2026 the end of 2027 because that's

3:29:26

really what's going to tell you it's

3:29:27

nothing's going to take away the budget

3:29:29

what it's going to take away is the

3:29:31

security blanket or part of it. Right?

3:29:33

That is the number. But I think finance

3:29:35

can answer what their estimate is. How

3:29:38

much is that hit? And and that's the

3:29:41

question, right? And it doesn't mean

3:29:43

that's my concern.

3:29:43

>> It doesn't mean you're not pursuing

3:29:45

other revenue sources during that

3:29:47

period. But I mean that is the context I

3:29:49

think you see it in. How much is the

3:29:51

fund balance going from where it is

3:29:53

projected historically to where will it

3:29:55

be three years from now based on this

3:29:57

expenditure? And I I can't answer that

3:29:59

question. I think that's a business

3:30:00

office, a finance office question,

3:30:02

budget question.

3:30:03

>> And and again, I'm just stating where

3:30:04

where I am with this. And I don't want,

3:30:06

you know, anyone to take this the wrong

3:30:08

way, but this is just where I am. Um I'm

3:30:11

I'm really concerned about this amount

3:30:13

of money uh being moved around. Um but

3:30:16

the reason why I'm going to vote yes,

3:30:18

because we can no longer delay this

3:30:20

because these costs keep rising. I see

3:30:22

we already jumped from 14, 20 to 23. and

3:30:26

the longer we wait. Um, but I just

3:30:28

wanted to have that on record from for

3:30:30

from my stance and um, again, thank you

3:30:32

guys for what you do. Um, but that's

3:30:34

where I stand. Thank you.

3:30:38

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Um, I don't

3:30:41

have any further questions. I will say

3:30:43

that I think this this can't be the end

3:30:45

of a conversation, right? Um, as we're

3:30:48

planning our budget for 2026 and 2027,

3:30:51

as we're looking at end of the year

3:30:52

expenses, these are all conversations

3:30:54

that we need to have. um and look at our

3:30:56

funds and make for sure that

3:30:59

as we're looking at positions being

3:31:02

filled and as we're looking at projects

3:31:04

to to come into the next couple of

3:31:06

years. Um I know we had a a capital

3:31:08

project and a planning process uh

3:31:11

through the finance office. Those are

3:31:13

all things that we need to look at so

3:31:14

that we can properly and efficiently

3:31:17

plan for the city's needs in the future

3:31:20

um and how this grocery market project

3:31:22

affects it and impacts it. Um, so I

3:31:24

don't think this can be the end of a

3:31:25

conversation if it would pass tonight.

3:31:27

Obviously, um, it's something that we

3:31:29

have to continue to talk about and

3:31:30

continue to plan for. Uh, I think it's a

3:31:32

reason why we need to have someone on

3:31:34

the hill advocating for the city and

3:31:35

trying to bring more funds in. Uh, we

3:31:37

can't forget about that conversation.

3:31:39

Uh, we can't forget about the the

3:31:41

support that was pledged by everyone

3:31:44

when the fire happened. Everybody had a

3:31:46

press conference in front of the

3:31:47

building. Um, and so maybe it's time to

3:31:49

start putting that pressure on and say,

3:31:50

"Okay, well, the bill's due." um you

3:31:53

know who's going to step up and actually

3:31:54

cut the check. Um it's also reaching out

3:31:56

to the different resources that we have

3:31:59

um the different grant opportunities

3:32:00

just every aspect that we can. Um

3:32:03

although we might have the money quote

3:32:05

unquote in the bank to cover it. Uh we

3:32:07

can't just rely on that either. We we

3:32:09

can't just say okay well the checks been

3:32:11

cut we have enough to cover it. It's

3:32:13

easier for us to do that than to look

3:32:14

for other revenue sources. So we have to

3:32:16

keep having this conversation and keep

3:32:17

moving forward. Um so that's just my

3:32:19

opinion on the finance side. Um, I know

3:32:21

we'll be continuing the conversation

3:32:23

around this time. Uh, every year we kind

3:32:26

of start looking at how much have we

3:32:27

underspent our budget. Um, and what we

3:32:31

what can we do with th those extra

3:32:33

funds? Uh, we paid off the debt in the

3:32:35

past years. We were able to to put a

3:32:36

large sum on that so that we didn't

3:32:38

carry that into another calendar year.

3:32:40

So, um, as we're coming to the end of

3:32:42

year, I think that's what uh what

3:32:43

solicitor Grover was kind of getting to.

3:32:45

As we're coming to that point, we have

3:32:46

to look at how much we have underspent

3:32:48

our budget this year so that we'll be

3:32:50

able to to kind of put that on this as

3:32:52

well and balance that out so that it's

3:32:53

not just such a negative hit to the 19

3:32:57

million that we have right now in our

3:32:59

our fund balance. So, I think those are

3:33:00

all things that we have to to think

3:33:02

about uh as we're at that point. So,

3:33:05

>> right. Um,

3:33:07

can I comment or do you want do you want

3:33:09

uh Councilwoman Davis, do you want to uh

3:33:12

go with your questions?

3:33:15

Okay. Ju I mean ju just a couple of

3:33:17

things. Um and and I'm not I'm not the

3:33:21

budget manager. All right. Okay. But you

3:33:25

know we're talking about revenue

3:33:27

potential and and revenue sources. And

3:33:30

when you look at our actual activity

3:33:32

thus far this year, there are some lines

3:33:35

that are doing very well compared to

3:33:38

budget. um

3:33:41

when you when you think about our the

3:33:43

the the EIT revenue our our transfer tax

3:33:46

revenue you know is outperforming so in

3:33:50

some respects somebody would might say

3:33:52

well why don't you you're doing so much

3:33:54

better in in those revenue lines why not

3:33:56

increase the budget in those lines

3:33:59

>> excuse me m you said the EIT are you

3:34:02

talking about that along with the LST

3:34:05

and 47

3:34:07

that's that we're using in act 47 that

3:34:09

those are double numbers. I'm just

3:34:11

asking for that EIT number.

3:34:12

>> Yeah. Yeah. Um I I I can't give you a

3:34:15

number, but I'm talking Yeah. EIT our

3:34:17

our tax revenue uh transfer tax revenue

3:34:20

which is real estate uh related. I'm

3:34:24

just looking at like budget to actual on

3:34:25

some of our revenue lines. So the the

3:34:28

temptation might be well let's increase

3:34:30

those lines to match what the actuals

3:34:32

are and then you can use that increase

3:34:35

to go up on the on on the board here to

3:34:38

help fund Broad Street Market. And to me

3:34:40

I I would hesitate to go there because

3:34:42

there are other revenue lines in the

3:34:44

general fund which are not as strong. So

3:34:48

it it's one of those things where you

3:34:50

know you do have the the revenue it's a

3:34:53

mixture. you have some lines that are

3:34:54

doing quite well, some others that are

3:34:56

not doing as well. So that's why I I

3:34:59

would hesitate to to to focus on any two

3:35:02

or three or four lines to help solve

3:35:04

this as far as coming up with other

3:35:06

revenue sources. That's, you know, we we

3:35:08

were looking at that, but we did not

3:35:10

want to go there. Um,

3:35:11

>> and when I meant other revenue sources,

3:35:13

I meant outside revenue sources.

3:35:15

>> Sure. Sure.

3:35:16

>> Not our money.

3:35:17

>> Right. Um and then the the the last

3:35:19

thing I want to mention too and uh it it

3:35:23

comes back to timing again and and and

3:35:26

you know not having to realize this full

3:35:28

outlay of cash by by the end of the year

3:35:30

which will not happen. But what's really

3:35:33

happening here with the the heavier

3:35:36

construction cost having to uh

3:35:38

materialize with the contractors

3:35:41

the contracts have to be solidified and

3:35:43

and approved. And to do that, to go

3:35:46

through uh the purchasing system and

3:35:49

have uh full approval by by everyone,

3:35:53

namely the the mayor, legal, and the

3:35:56

controller, there needs to be budget in

3:35:59

the system on the books. Uh so the when

3:36:02

the incumbrances go when when the

3:36:04

commitments go out to the books looking

3:36:06

for budget, there's going to be budget

3:36:07

available. uh even though it's not a

3:36:09

it's not a spend. If if for example, if

3:36:12

you have a million-doll project and you

3:36:15

know come the end of the year you've

3:36:16

spent $400,000 in cash, you still had to

3:36:19

budget 1 million uh to to get it on the

3:36:22

books and then the 600,000 then becomes

3:36:26

uh a uh an item for next year's budget

3:36:31

because it's going to roll forward into

3:36:33

the following year.

3:36:35

just to to to explain that. Um, but that

3:36:39

that's those are the only two additional

3:36:41

items I wanted to to comment on.

3:36:46

>> Councilwoman Davis, any questions?

3:36:48

>> Thank you, Vice President Green.

3:36:51

I don't have any questions, but I want

3:36:55

to agree with you, Mr.

3:37:00

McCutchenson

3:37:02

and also solicitor Grover that

3:37:05

everybody's speaking a different

3:37:07

language and it would be nice if we

3:37:11

could see that language you know with

3:37:14

every you have an accountant's mind you

3:37:17

know exactly what's going on where money

3:37:19

went where it came from you can see that

3:37:23

Mr. from a country in your brain, but we

3:37:27

can't see that. I can't see that. The

3:37:29

public can't see that and it's very hard

3:37:32

to follow. Um, I have confidence in you

3:37:38

that it's real, but

3:37:41

it would make it easier if we could

3:37:43

actually see all the details that you

3:37:46

just went through. If we could see it,

3:37:50

it would make it easier to understand.

3:37:53

And I just don't understand why we can't

3:37:56

have something that we could see

3:38:00

and understand, if that makes sense.

3:38:02

It's getting late, but thank you. That's

3:38:06

it for me.

3:38:08

Thank you very much. Um, I'm going to

3:38:11

turn it over to Mr. Baker. uh if you

3:38:14

would have anything you'd like to to add

3:38:16

as especially as far as the timeline um

3:38:20

and the schedule that you sent us.

3:38:26

>> Good evening, council. Um really the

3:38:29

only thing that I have to add is uh you

3:38:32

know what we've kind of touched base on

3:38:34

previously. Uh, as was stated earlier,

3:38:37

uh, this timeline is aggressive. Uh, it

3:38:40

is achievable, but it is dependent on

3:38:43

funding. As Brian explained, if we don't

3:38:46

have the funds in the coffers, we do not

3:38:48

have the ability to sign the contracts

3:38:50

to move forward. Um, unfortunately,

3:38:52

these contracts are kind of tied to each

3:38:54

other. We did separate into 11 different

3:38:57

packages, uh, trying to give opportunity

3:38:59

to as many businesses as possible. But

3:39:02

since we did that, there are 11

3:39:04

different entities that have to work

3:39:06

together uh to achieve the same goal.

3:39:08

So, uh that being said, um it's kind of

3:39:12

crucial if if we're going to meet this

3:39:15

timeline that we do move forward in in

3:39:17

an expedited manner. um if we can't uh

3:39:21

move forward with our site contract, our

3:39:23

main contractor, our masonry contractor,

3:39:25

you name it, uh we're not going to be

3:39:27

able to kind of get past a certain point

3:39:29

and and it's a pretty early stage. Uh so

3:39:32

that's that's kind of the the crucial

3:39:34

part on my side for council to to know

3:39:36

and understand uh that a fully funded

3:39:39

project is important for us to um stay

3:39:42

anywhere close to staying on the

3:39:44

schedule. and weather does play a factor

3:39:46

in our construction as well since we do

3:39:48

have a building without an envelope

3:39:50

sealed without a roof in certain areas.

3:39:53

We have started demolition work. Um

3:39:55

there's there's been a lot of uh a lot

3:39:58

of positive input uh from everyone that

3:40:00

that we've seen around the area. Um but

3:40:03

you know, it's important that we keep

3:40:04

that going if if uh possible. So that's

3:40:08

that's about all I have to say as far as

3:40:09

comments go unless you have any

3:40:11

additional questions for me.

3:40:13

All right. Thank you. I don't have any

3:40:15

questions at the moment. Councilwoman

3:40:17

Davis, any questions for Mr. Baker?

3:40:20

>> No questions.

3:40:22

>> President Hill. Yes, I have a few

3:40:24

questions. First, I want to make sure

3:40:26

that this is the updated

3:40:30

schedule because we were sent one at

3:40:34

12:44 p.m. today and then we received

3:40:38

one at 3:28 p.m. So, I just wanted to

3:40:41

make sure that this was the updated

3:40:43

schedule. The consultant made a minor

3:40:46

error on the first one that was sent.

3:40:49

>> Yes. So, this should be the most

3:40:51

up-to-date schedule. Um I do believe

3:40:53

that they had to you know this is a a

3:40:55

moving target so they are updating the

3:40:57

schedule sometimes weekly just to keep

3:41:00

it accurate.

3:41:01

>> Okay.

3:41:02

Um now you you mentioned you have to

3:41:05

sign contracts or you have to have the

3:41:07

money in the coffers but you've already

3:41:09

started signing contracts. Is that

3:41:11

correct?

3:41:12

>> We do have some of the minor contracts

3:41:14

that we have the existing funds for

3:41:16

signed and they are started but uh that

3:41:19

being said we have the demo contract

3:41:20

signed. So, we have a demolition

3:41:22

contractor out there, but the um like

3:41:25

the site contractor, they have the uh

3:41:28

wall shoring in their package. So, the

3:41:31

demolition contractor can only go so far

3:41:33

before the walls become unstable and

3:41:34

they need to be shored up by the site

3:41:36

contractor. So, again, that's just one

3:41:39

of many, many different um kind of

3:41:42

examples on how these individual

3:41:44

packages are all working in tandem with

3:41:46

each other to keep the project moving

3:41:48

forward.

3:41:49

>> Okay. Okay. And then I have one other

3:41:51

question. I'm not sure if you can answer

3:41:53

it or somebody else can. This was a text

3:41:56

message that I received from a resident

3:41:58

on Friday at 6:12 p.m. Just saw on the

3:42:02

news 14.4 million plus then 19 million

3:42:06

is in parenthesis for the Broad Street

3:42:09

market. The disparity study hasn't been

3:42:11

ratified and there is no percentage in

3:42:13

the RFPs for diverse businesses. This

3:42:17

may never come again. I asked about the

3:42:21

percentage at the pre-bid and there they

3:42:24

said there is none. So I just wanted to

3:42:27

clarify is that accurate that there are

3:42:30

there's no percentage

3:42:32

um in the RFPs for diverse businesses.

3:42:36

>> There is not allowed to be a legally

3:42:39

mandated one there. We and frankly I

3:42:42

went to one of the meetings at the

3:42:43

request to the mayor to emphasize the

3:42:45

need for having participation in local

3:42:49

workers pretty vigorously. Uh that

3:42:53

that's an issue for the council and the

3:42:55

mayor and got we understand that

3:42:57

completely from the entities that we

3:43:00

were talking to at the time. But no, we

3:43:02

can't mandate it and we can't mandate it

3:43:04

without an approved ordinance that does

3:43:06

it because the last ordinance plainly um

3:43:10

fell apart under the court rulings that

3:43:13

existed regarding the language that we

3:43:14

had. It wasn't our case, but it was our

3:43:16

languagevious. We hadvious obviously

3:43:18

borrowed it from someone else and a

3:43:20

court threw it all out. Um, frankly, in

3:43:23

the atmosphere we're in right now

3:43:24

nationally, it's getting harder and

3:43:26

harder to adopt. I mean, that is the

3:43:29

simple reality and Harrisburg does it.

3:43:30

They're going to be ahead of it and in

3:43:32

the fight. So, but mandating it

3:43:35

incredibly difficult as a legal.

3:43:39

>> Well, I'd rather be ahead of it and in a

3:43:41

fight than just uh businesses missing

3:43:46

out on this once in a-lifetime

3:43:48

opportunity. I think that it's it's

3:43:50

unfortunate because it's something that

3:43:52

this council, as you noted, um

3:43:57

well, we were blamed for holding

3:43:59

everything up because of it. But I think

3:44:01

that it's unfortunate that our um

3:44:04

Harrisburg based uh minority and

3:44:08

womenowned businesses won't have a seat

3:44:11

at this table and I think that's that's

3:44:13

it's just unfortunate. So, thank you for

3:44:16

your response to the constituent. I they

3:44:19

were supposed to come. I hope that

3:44:20

they're listening so they could hear

3:44:22

you. Um I don't have any other

3:44:24

questions.

3:44:27

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

3:44:29

Councilwoman

3:44:42

Ross, any questions or comments?

3:44:50

>> We'll move on to Councilman Rodriguez.

3:44:52

Any questions or comments?

3:44:54

>> Thank you, Madam Vice President. Um, my

3:44:56

question was answered in somewhat

3:44:58

format. I just wanted to know how the

3:45:01

appropriations went for the people that

3:45:02

are actually on the job now. I saw

3:45:04

reports that work has already begun, but

3:45:07

uh, Director Baker just alluded to that.

3:45:09

So, that's all I have. Thank you.

3:45:12

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones.

3:45:14

>> No questions.

3:45:15

>> Thank you. And once again, Councilwoman

3:45:17

Ross.

3:45:20

Seeing none, uh, are there any other

3:45:23

questions?

3:45:26

All right. Um, I don't have any

3:45:27

questions at the moment. Thank you very

3:45:29

much, Mr. Baker and Mr. McCutchen for

3:45:32

being here tonight. Thank you for

3:45:34

hanging in there with us. It's um,

3:45:36

getting later, but uh, this was an

3:45:38

important discussion for us to have.

3:45:39

>> I have one more question. Yes,

3:45:41

>> Mr. Trudeelle, are you able to pull up

3:45:43

the renderings that were shared?

3:45:49

>> Okay. Is he allowed to share them?

3:45:52

>> Okay.

3:45:57

Okay. I just wanted to make sure if he's

3:46:00

able to. I don't know.

3:46:06

>> They look a lot like the uh existing

3:46:08

building, so they don't come up.

3:46:10

>> They do.

3:46:24

There we go.

3:46:28

Would anybody like to walk through or

3:46:29

we're just going to share each slide?

3:46:32

Any discussion or commentary?

3:46:36

Okay. Well, Central Plaza, Central Plaza

3:46:40

renderings. This is what

3:46:52

And so with the central plaza, um you

3:46:55

can note that it it looks similar to how

3:46:56

it does now. Uh but that entire area

3:46:59

will have to be uh I'd say taxfully

3:47:03

worked on underneath because it will be

3:47:04

infrastructure that's going to be run.

3:47:07

Uh new gas lines, new electric lines,

3:47:09

higher voltages, uh new sewer lines,

3:47:11

centralized grease trap. Uh this would

3:47:14

be the um the east end plaza area. This

3:47:19

we we'd propose to have uh somewhat of a

3:47:21

rain garden uh raised area there uh with

3:47:26

maybe like a small amphitheater uh type

3:47:28

seating area back there and an eating

3:47:30

area. Um we did uh pay a lot of

3:47:33

attention to the the needs and you know

3:47:36

the fact that there's a school right

3:47:37

next to uh to that area. So we didn't

3:47:40

want to put the seating too close to the

3:47:42

roads. We wanted to keep line of sight

3:47:43

up. Uh we wanted to also give uh people,

3:47:46

you know, the ability to use that for

3:47:48

multi-use, whether it be for events or,

3:47:51

you know, evening movies, you name it.

3:47:54

Um we're going to keep all the clear

3:47:55

story windows. Uh everything you see

3:47:57

from the outside now will be uh very

3:48:00

similar, if not exactly the same, but it

3:48:02

will be up to date to to more modern

3:48:04

standards uh with much more rigidity and

3:48:07

strength throughout the structure

3:48:08

itself. And for the seating options on

3:48:11

slide 10, the last slide, there's option

3:48:13

A uh with a monolithic

3:48:17

stone seating or option B, a metal bench

3:48:20

seating. How will that be determined?

3:48:24

>> Uh I do believe that um the mayor has

3:48:28

determined the uh bench seating. We also

3:48:30

had some um different architects that

3:48:33

weighed in on that on the benefits of

3:48:35

the bench compared to the monolithic

3:48:37

stone. uh just as far as cleanliness,

3:48:40

upkeep, and um you know, the comfort. Uh

3:48:44

those stones are also kind of like a

3:48:46

placeholder for an option for seating.

3:48:48

They weren't a a specific, you know,

3:48:50

this is exactly what we're going to put

3:48:51

here. It's more of a they were showing

3:48:53

an option of a possibility.

3:48:56

>> Okay.

3:48:58

I like the bench, but thanks. Thank you,

3:49:01

Mr. Trudeale.

3:49:04

>> Thank you very much. Any other questions

3:49:06

or comments for um the administration?

3:49:12

Seeing none, uh

3:49:14

>> um I'm sorry. I don't know if you all

3:49:16

can hear me.

3:49:18

>> We can hear you now. Yes.

3:49:20

>> Okay. I I do apologize. Um even though

3:49:23

after all these years, Zoom is just not

3:49:26

what it needs to be. But um I just I

3:49:29

just wanted to make a comment. I I can I

3:49:31

was able to hear everything that was um

3:49:34

being said. Um I think my biggest

3:49:37

concern the market is very important to

3:49:40

us to our community and I know how

3:49:42

important it is for us to rebuild it and

3:49:45

um it's a staple. I want it done right

3:49:48

and I think we all do. I think my

3:49:50

biggest concern is the part of taking

3:49:53

the $412,000

3:49:55

out of the um federal general or the

3:49:59

federal fund and correct me if I'm wrong

3:50:01

in any of this which was placed in there

3:50:04

because we didn't use all of the ARPA

3:50:07

funds but the ARPA funds came into play

3:50:10

from COVID which was to help rebuild

3:50:12

communities. Um, yes, I do understand

3:50:15

that we're trying to rebuild the market,

3:50:17

but I feel like that money was essential

3:50:20

to just

3:50:22

>> doing things in the community that we

3:50:24

weren't able to do. Maybe it was better

3:50:26

lighting. Maybe it was creating even

3:50:28

more housing for market value housing as

3:50:32

well and bringing back a baseball league

3:50:34

to the city. Just just things that were

3:50:36

vital that we probably couldn't do. And

3:50:38

I'm afraid of taking my biggest concern

3:50:41

is taking that money out. Yes, we can

3:50:43

say this is the only time, but will it

3:50:45

really be to the point where there's

3:50:48

nothing left to actually do what it was

3:50:51

meant to do? And that is my biggest

3:50:53

concern. It's very hard to vote on this

3:50:55

tonight, even with all the information

3:50:57

that's being given because of that just

3:51:00

um nervousness for me, for the

3:51:03

residents. That's their biggest concern.

3:51:04

That's a lot of things I heard from

3:51:06

residents. So, I just wanted um to say

3:51:09

that I wanted to voice that concern. I

3:51:11

wanted to say I it's very hard to vote

3:51:13

on this tonight. I'm I'm worried. Um but

3:51:17

I just um I don't know that that's my

3:51:20

biggest concern with the money coming

3:51:21

out of that fund knowing what that money

3:51:24

was essentially supposed to be used for.

3:51:26

>> May I miss Madam President?

3:51:29

>> Sure.

3:51:29

>> So, so that money was not ARPA money.

3:51:31

That is CDBG programming money. As you

3:51:34

know, sometimes it takes five to six

3:51:36

years that we have open programming

3:51:38

money from CDBG block grants. So that

3:51:40

was a million dollars that was still

3:51:42

there in programming money that was made

3:51:44

available for this where we have

3:51:46

deadlines every and sometime it's three

3:51:49

years, sometimes it's five years to get

3:51:50

it spent. So that is the pot that is

3:51:53

attributable to. It's not it's not the

3:51:55

ARP of funds.

3:51:58

is where we're allowed to infrastructure

3:52:00

that I mean and maybe they they it was

3:52:03

said today and I didn't hear it but last

3:52:05

week that's what I'm almost certain was

3:52:08

mentioned

3:52:10

>> so I'm confused on when it changed if I

3:52:12

missed a conversation I felt like I

3:52:14

heard everything tonight but I'm almost

3:52:16

certain that was what was said last week

3:52:18

>> and it's directly referenced as CDBG

3:52:20

funds in the actual reallocation

3:52:23

schedule

3:52:24

>> I think councilwoman RS is talking about

3:52:26

the federal grants fund

3:52:28

That was the interest that we have

3:52:32

materialized from the um so it's it's

3:52:35

not actual money that was um allocated

3:52:39

for programming in the ARPA not ARPA

3:52:41

funds um it is interest that has acrewed

3:52:45

over time from the funds sitting unused

3:52:48

in our bank accounts.

3:52:51

>> Okay. Thank you.

3:52:53

Any

3:52:55

other comments or questions?

3:52:59

Seeing none, I make a Do I make the

3:53:01

motion? You make the motion to go back

3:53:02

into session. I make a motion to go back

3:53:06

into session.

3:53:07

>> So move.

3:53:08

>> Thank you. Uh we will now resume our

3:53:11

special legislative session. We have

3:53:14

before us resolution 63 of 20125. Mr.

3:53:18

Trudeell, could you please read it into

3:53:20

the record one last time? Resolution 63,

3:53:23

2025, a resolution approving the six

3:53:26

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

3:53:28

related to the rebuild of the Broad

3:53:30

Street Market brick building.

3:53:32

>> Thank you, council members. Are there

3:53:34

any final questions, comments, or

3:53:36

concerns

3:53:38

related to resolution 65 of 2025?

3:53:43

>> Um, I will just make the the comment of

3:53:46

this has been a long process. Um, it's

3:53:50

been a couple of years since the fire at

3:53:52

the Broad Street Market. Uh, it seems

3:53:54

like it's been several conversations.

3:53:56

Um, I will say I don't like the fact

3:53:59

that every time it comes down, it's

3:54:01

rushed. You know, it's kind of like we

3:54:03

need the money now. We need the money

3:54:05

now or everything's going to stop. And

3:54:06

if city council doesn't pass it today,

3:54:08

the work doesn't get done tomorrow. And

3:54:11

then the conversation always comes back

3:54:13

from the residents or to the residents

3:54:16

um being told that well the market would

3:54:18

have been done if city council had voted

3:54:20

on it sooner. If the information had

3:54:22

been gotten to us sooner then we could

3:54:23

have voted on it sooner or we could have

3:54:24

had more information. The fact that

3:54:26

there are

3:54:29

six people here from the public, I'm not

3:54:32

including the media, six people here or

3:54:34

so from the public. Um, as much outcries

3:54:37

as we've seen uh regarding the broad

3:54:40

street market at the the different

3:54:42

meetings, at the different uh

3:54:44

conversations we've had, I think that

3:54:46

alone shows um how rushed this feels. Um

3:54:50

and how discouraged uh a lot of

3:54:52

residents are feeling about the Broad

3:54:53

Street Market project to to begin with.

3:54:56

Um it was all over the news a lot today.

3:54:58

I I've got lots of calls and and texts

3:55:00

saying what's going on with the Broad

3:55:02

Street Market. I was out with my nephew

3:55:04

this weekend and someone came and said,

3:55:06

"I heard you guys aren't even building

3:55:07

the Broad Street market." Um, because

3:55:09

it's just been so much delay in what's

3:55:12

going on. Obviously, I had the

3:55:14

conversation and corrected them on that,

3:55:15

but I think it just kind of goes to see

3:55:17

how the residents are starting to feel

3:55:18

discouraged in this project itself. Um,

3:55:21

I think lack of clear communication

3:55:23

plays a role in it as well. I think

3:55:25

there should be more public update

3:55:26

meetings just saying this is what's

3:55:28

going on, this is the timeline we're

3:55:30

looking at. It doesn't have to be that

3:55:32

everything's perfect, but it kind of

3:55:33

seems like it's hidden. Um, and then

3:55:36

people start questioning, well then

3:55:38

where's the money going? Why is it all

3:55:39

of a sudden are we looking at $19

3:55:40

million when I've heard nothing for the

3:55:42

past six months and now it's like we

3:55:44

need all this money. Um, and

3:55:47

I will say that council kind of feels I

3:55:49

I I won't say council, I'll say I feel

3:55:51

that way as well. Um, that, you know, we

3:55:53

shouldn't have to keep constantly coming

3:55:54

back saying, "Can we get an update? Can

3:55:57

we get information?

3:55:59

Can we get a presentation? You're asking

3:56:01

for the money. Can you give us more of a

3:56:03

breakdown of what the money is going to

3:56:04

be used for? Um, I kind of felt like

3:56:07

last week I shouldn't have had to ask,

3:56:08

can we get more of a breakdown? Can we

3:56:10

get some images? Can we get a

3:56:11

presentation? Felt like that should have

3:56:13

just automatically come because if you

3:56:14

thought we were just going to rubber

3:56:15

stamp $19 million, you've got the wrong

3:56:18

council. Um, so I would like to say just

3:56:22

as this process moves forward one way or

3:56:24

the other, we need more communication

3:56:26

with council and with the public on

3:56:28

what's going on in every aspect of the

3:56:29

city. Um, especially this Broad Street

3:56:31

Market project. Uh, because there's

3:56:33

there's always lots of conversation when

3:56:35

it's time for the money to come forth.

3:56:37

But then after after the budget's

3:56:39

passed, everyone gets quiet and it's

3:56:41

kind of like it's the administration's

3:56:43

decision and we don't have to talk to

3:56:44

you about it. But when it's time for the

3:56:47

money, it's like, okay, well, this is up

3:56:49

to council and if you don't pass it,

3:56:50

then it all fails and it's all your

3:56:51

fault and the residents can blame you

3:56:53

and that just doesn't feel fair. Um, and

3:56:55

it doesn't seem genuine when it comes

3:56:57

down that way. Understand um that there

3:57:00

are lots of moving parts. Uh but I also

3:57:02

understand that we're paying a a hefty

3:57:04

price to a construction manager. They

3:57:08

have time to show up and give us a

3:57:09

presentation just the same. Um and so

3:57:12

you might have other things going on. I

3:57:14

understand. Uh, Director Baker, you have

3:57:16

other parts of your job. Uh, but we

3:57:18

hired a construction manager because we

3:57:20

knew you wouldn't have the time along

3:57:22

with everything else on your plate to

3:57:24

handle this project alone. Uh, it's a

3:57:26

huge lift and it's the reason why we

3:57:30

thought we got all the resources we

3:57:31

needed to make the decisions we needed.

3:57:33

But yet and still, it comes down to the

3:57:35

day before a special legislative

3:57:37

session. If you don't pass this, the

3:57:39

bills don't get paid. Um, and it makes

3:57:42

me want to vote against it because it

3:57:44

feels rushed, but I wouldn't punish the

3:57:46

residents of Harrisburg for the lack of

3:57:49

transparency and conversation uh, from

3:57:51

the administration side as far as this

3:57:53

project. So, I will be voting in support

3:57:55

of it because it's what needs to be

3:57:57

done, but I don't feel

3:58:01

happy about it in the process of how

3:58:03

it's been done. So, that's my

3:58:05

long-winded comment.

3:58:07

>> No, that's fine. Are there any

3:58:08

additional comments?

3:58:10

I have one.

3:58:13

As usual with this administration, we

3:58:16

continue to receive information at the

3:58:18

24th hour, forcing city council to vote

3:58:22

immediately on a resolution.

3:58:25

Just today, today, Tuesday, September

3:58:28

30th, 2025, council members received

3:58:32

four emails regarding the Broad Street

3:58:34

Market. The first at 11:08 a.m. It was a

3:58:38

summary of the project costs including

3:58:41

upcoming estimated construction.

3:58:44

The second 12:44 p.m. Broad Street

3:58:48

Market brick building restoration

3:58:50

schedule.

3:58:52

3:28 p.m. updated Broad Street Market

3:58:55

brick building restoration schedule.

3:58:58

That's the one where the consultant made

3:58:59

a minor error to the schedule. and then

3:59:03

one at five o'clock from Mr. Trudale

3:59:06

which included again the restoration

3:59:08

schedule which I'm not sure if it was

3:59:10

the first one or the second one and then

3:59:13

the renderings that you just saw that

3:59:15

were dated July 7th of 2025.

3:59:20

It's not fair to us to constantly

3:59:24

receive everything at the last minute.

3:59:27

We have full-time jobs and other

3:59:30

responsibilities. I can't even check my

3:59:32

email on my phone if I wanted to. I have

3:59:34

to physically be seated in front of this

3:59:37

computer to check the email. So, do you

3:59:39

know when I saw them, I was having

3:59:41

difficulty getting on the internet here,

3:59:44

and I didn't I couldn't open it until

3:59:46

5:38 p.m. So, it's just a lot of

3:59:49

information to digest at the last

3:59:51

minute. And it seems to be a recurring

3:59:53

theme with this administration, and it's

3:59:55

not fair to us. It's not fair to us to

4:00:01

really be forced to make a decision. You

4:00:03

heard tonight there's a whole bunch of

4:00:05

angst in this room right now amongst

4:00:07

council members and we're the ones that

4:00:09

have to vote. We have to support this

4:00:12

because if not,

4:00:16

it's going to cost us more. The

4:00:18

residents are going to be upset. The

4:00:19

market will not be restored to its full

4:00:22

glory. And it's just not fair. Um, if

4:00:26

I'm being completely honest, I really

4:00:28

wanted to delay this vote a whole

4:00:30

another week to ensure that we had

4:00:32

enough time to go through all of this.

4:00:34

This, do you see this? It looks like a

4:00:36

maze. Highlights in blue, then there's

4:00:38

dots and dates. This is a lot to just

4:00:42

receive right now and you have to vote

4:00:45

yes. It's not fair and it's consistently

4:00:48

a problem.

4:00:53

The other issue that I wanted to address

4:00:56

was the not ARPA money that transformed

4:01:01

into general fund money. But do you know

4:01:04

what else that money was intended to be

4:01:07

used for? Workforce development

4:01:09

programs, internship programs so that we

4:01:12

can generate our own internal workforce

4:01:15

of city residents. It's a cycle, right?

4:01:20

There were other things that money was

4:01:22

intended to be used for. Instead, it's

4:01:25

all basically now being utilized for the

4:01:28

Broad Street Market. And we have to say

4:01:31

yes. Community Matters Grant Program.

4:01:34

That was the grant program for minority

4:01:38

community minorityowned and womenowned

4:01:41

businesses. A one-time

4:01:43

grant program. community connection hubs

4:01:47

to assist again with workforce

4:01:49

development, job training, skills

4:01:51

building.

4:01:54

So, it's unfortunate. I I mentioned at

4:01:58

the beginning of this special

4:01:59

legislative session that I was

4:02:02

reluctantly starting this meeting and

4:02:05

I'm very much reluctantly voting yes

4:02:09

because I have to because contracts have

4:02:12

already begun to be signed. I feel like

4:02:15

that's a little premature, but it's

4:02:17

business as usual because things have to

4:02:19

keep moving. And I do not want

4:02:20

Harrisburg City Council to be regarded

4:02:24

as the stop sign for any movement with

4:02:29

Broad Street Market.

4:02:32

So, I will be voting yes. Again, it's

4:02:34

extremely reluctantly.

4:02:36

Um, and I just don't think that it's

4:02:38

fair that this administration continues

4:02:42

to force city council's hand.

4:02:46

Mr. Trudeelle, could you please call the

4:02:48

vote?

4:02:51

>> Miss Davis,

4:02:53

>> yes.

4:02:55

>> Miss Green,

4:02:56

>> yes.

4:02:58

>> Mr. Jones,

4:02:59

>> yay.

4:03:00

>> Miss Rolls,

4:03:02

>> yes.

4:03:04

Mr. Rodriguez.

4:03:07

>> Yes.

4:03:08

>> Miss Hill.

4:03:10

>> Yes.

4:03:11

>> Resolution 63 2025 passes by vote of 6

4:03:15

to zero.

4:03:16

>> Thank you.

4:03:19

The time is 9:40 p.m. We do not have any

4:03:23

old business. We do not have any new

4:03:25

business. I will entertain a motion to

4:03:27

adjurnn.

4:03:30

>> Second. Thank you. We stand a journal.

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.