TOR ZUR HÖLLE:🚨PROF. POLLEIT WARNT VOR FINALEN RAUBZUG!! *Verlasst Sofort Land?*

-

You can see that with the issuance of the cash. The cash is a thorn in the eye for the state. And I think if you think about it further, then the issuance of digital central bank money seems to be even worse than what George Orwell wrote down in his dystopia in 1984. That would actually be the total control.

it is advisable to speak out against it, to prevent it from being issued by digital central bank money. Of course, the alarm bells have to ring. You have to leave the region in the early stages where the freedoms are restricted to the most and go there where they are still relatively maintained.

I found it interesting, you talked about it, you said it so literally, I think, if I'm not mistaken, that the digital euro opens the door to hell. What does that mean? Digital central bank money is money that is spent by the central bank alone. Today the monetary constitution is like this.

that there is central bank money in the form of cash, so especially the banknotes that we have in the portmonee, plus goods that the business banks hold at the central bank. And on the basis of this central bank money,

Are the business banks licensed by credit transfer to generate their own fiat money through credit transfer to private and state institutions?

Digital central bank money would now be money that the central bank spends in the form of goods that are either kept in a personal wallet or on accounts with the central bank. And now you have to know in which competition this digital central bank money is in terms of the existing types of money.

will of course contribute to further suppressing cash from payment traffic. Of course, you will help by further discriminating the use of cash, making people mad, the costs of cash withdrawal increase at the cash machine, etc. And that people then have an incentive to evade digital central bank money.

And digital central bank money also has a competitive relationship to business bank money. It may well be that in certain situations, especially when the markets are tense, it is more attractive for money holders to keep digital central bank money and not private business bank money. And there, too, a competition for repression takes place. The central bank therefore draws the demand for money on itself and in the extreme case,

There is only a monolithic central bank money monopoly left, in which the business banks are virtually suppressed, maybe still offer payments, but are completely suppressed from the credit transfer process.

Yes, and then the state basically has the total authority over the money production. So then the state can determine who gets what new money. So then there are political decrees to promote certain industries. They then get new loans in digital central bank money and others don't. And with that, of course, you can change the whole economy, the whole social life, and

And you can give certain groups of people new money and others not. You can use the digital central bank money, and now I come to this picture that you have rightly quoted, that this is the door to hell. You can of course also program this.

So, for example, if you read literature or attend events that do not suit the current rulers, then payments are stopped, then you cannot buy train tickets or fly on vacation with the plane, that is then all no longer possible. This is the total control that can ultimately be put into the hands of the Central Bank Council. And I think if you think about it further, then the issuance of digital central bank money appears

to be even worse than what George Orwell wrote down in his dystopia in 1984. That would actually be the total control and in this respect you are well advised, every responsible citizen is well advised to speak out against it, to prevent it from being issued by digital central bank money.

Why is it not told to the citizens in a transparent way? Because what you are now telling is something completely contrary to what the central banks are telling, for example. They say, "That's cool, that's better, then we have something more efficient, then we are up to date and so on." That means, is it deliberately manipulated or even lied to, because you let people run into something here without even telling people what the potential dangers would be?

I'll start by answering the question with the note that in the United States of America the US administration changed the constitution of the US central bank in early January 2026.

There it was written that the Central Bank Council, the US Central Bank, is not authorized to issue digital central bank money. In America, there was a discussion about the for and against of this digital central bank money and it was decided that this

Entscheidung, nicht den Zentralbankräten zu überlassen, sondern dem Kongress vorzubehalten. Und auf absehbare Zeit, so ist meine Einschätzung, wird es zum Beispiel in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika kein digitales Zentralbankgeld geben, weil man die Gefahren für die Freiheit oder auch einige Aspekte, die ich eben genannt habe, als so gewichtig ansieht, dass sie letztlich alle möglichen positiven Effekte von digitalem Zentralbankgeld überkompensieren.

Thank you very much.

Mark, maybe I'm too one-sided, but in the consideration of costs and benefits, the issuance of digital central bank money seems to me to be in no way responsible.

I am also basically a big critic of the central bank fiat system, in which state-monopolized banks have the superiority over the money production. I think that's an extremely bad institution that causes extremely many and great damage, which ultimately also destroys the freedom of the citizens.

Insofar kann ich auch gar nicht zustimmen, wenn die Zentralbank jetzt vorschlägt, digitales Zentralbankgeld auszugeben. Also nochmal, in der Abwägung von für und wieder komme ich zu einem, wie ich meine, überzeugenden Urteil, dass das unheilvoll ist, dass das die Tür zur Hölle aufstößt, wenn man digitales Zentralbankgeld ausgibt.

Yes, I would confirm that. I would even go one step further. I also thought for a long time, is there any advantage for the citizen if we have such a digital central bank money? But we actually only have advantages for the central bank. But I actually come to the conclusion that we actually don't have any real advantages for the citizen, because we can already pay digitally. And I say, is there any advantage that I would have as a citizen if there was digital central bank money?

You make a very important point that I will now also take up again. You put this adjective "digital" before "euro", so you wanted to introduce the digital euro. And you probably did that because "digital" sounds so modern, so progressive, progressive. And then you said, "That probably sounds good when we say this digital central bank money, we baptize it with digital euros."

But this digital euro is primitive fiat money. It is by no means better than the fiat money that we already have on the accounts of the business banks today, which the European Central Bank spends. A very short information before we continue here immediately. More and more crises are popping up here on the horizon. Whether it's about any virus pandemics, whether it's about any energy shortages, war rhetoric that is driven up.

war, which is now being pushed forward more and more, but of course also high inflation, geopolitical uncertainty and co. And if you want to know how to get optimally up here, what you can do here to get out of these crises even as a winner, how you can get up here with a local independent income, with a correct emigration, if you want to, or just plan B, if it really cracks here,

what you can do, what you should do, then you are welcome to the next System Exit Workshop. The whole thing is completely free of charge. There is no hook or anything. You can now enter completely free of charge below and we'll see each other. It's just the exporter or the storage station that is now the central bank. And I also mean there are no advantages.

Again, in the careful consideration of the costs and benefits of such digital central bank money, many of the transactions via smart contracts, for example, can of course also be wrapped up via tokenized business bank money. So if you would even drive in the fiat money system, then you could just digitally...

...

And I don't see any public discussion about it. I was in France the other day. The British first put this idea on the ice, to give out a digital punch. But the discussion, for example, in Italy is not being held. It is not being held in France either.

I hope we change that now with our interview, Marc. But large parts of the population do not even know what is to be implemented and what consequences that will have for them and their descendants.

What I find interesting, for example, is that with the digital euro, many people who watch this will probably be able to understand that there are no real advantages. But you also went into it. In the USA there is this law that says, okay, there will be no digital dollar or no CBDC.

But now they have these stablecoins and of course there are also many people who argue that a stablecoin is basically the same as central bank money, only it is not issued by the state, but rather privately issued. And we also see that there are censorship lists, there are simply stablecoin accounts and so on locked and it is of course also programmable money. Only the USA is one step further. They realize that the population does not eat up this narrative, that's why we are issuing central bank money. So we make a kind of public-private partnership.

and then control these companies that spend these stablecoins and have created central bank money through the back door. Yes, the Fiat money system, Marc, is a very, very unhealthy institution. I once called it the devil's money with a book title. And all the actions that are built on this Fiat money regime do not come to good results. And the stablecoins, there are different variants. So

What Wall Street likes is stablecoins that are covered with short-term US debt deductions. That's the idea. The issuers then do the following. They offer a dollar token.

stablecoin and then get a transfer. Someone buys this stablecoin and with the dollar that the issuer then receives, he then buys short-term state loans. And for the American government, this is a kind of shift station. They can now sell their short-term debt deductions to these stablecoin issuers and thus create an additional demand for debt papers and keep the interest low.

And the stablecoin is then, in quotation marks, covered by debt papers, denominated in fiat money. And of course you can expect that such a stablecoin does not represent reliable money. So it would be different in the case, for example, if you look at constructions like Paxgold, there the

The stablecoin emitter, yes, the dollar and hopefully buys with physical gold. So there you would have at least a medium underliegen, which you can not multiply as much as US state bonds. And that would then tend to be a little more solid in the future. But of course, all are

stablecoins, all digitalized things that are thought up by Wall Street, ultimately exposed to the state's access and Mark

How to turn it around. The big problem of the new era is the state as we know it today. Because the state is building on force and violence, a peace of mind in the truest sense of the word. It prevents people from connecting in a peaceful and productive way.

A state is not what many people hope for. And those who have the government's violence inside, they don't have the well-being of the broad population in their eyes. They follow other people.

or have other interests than to increase the wealth of the wider population. And I think a learning process has to be used there. In some countries it is now also starting. But to believe that stablecoins are now being built from the fiat money system would bring a better money system, that is illusory.

That means they took a dollar, tied a loop around it and sold it to people as great health drink money. One part that we still have to talk about is this digital ID, which is supposed to come more and more. Now there will be a citizen app and a citizen wallet in 2027. And what they want to introduce there is EU ID.

What does that mean? Is that the keystone that you can still connect with this digital money and where you can create even more control? So always when the state takes action that gives it more control and more access possibilities, of course, the alarm bells have to ring. Digitalization is of course in many areas

It's a lot of benefits. There are of course also the dark sides or the shadow sides. If the digitalization is abused, be it either by a monopolist or by a force and force apparatus, as the state presents it,

Also, I personally believe that this will not end well, because the state is of course interested in fully controlling the citizens. You can also see this with the issuance of the cash. The cash is a thorn in the state's eye, because the citizen still has a possibility to preserve a certain financial private sphere. So if you have too much

If the state is being harassed, then there is still the possibility that people will then emigrate, withdraw their transactions into cash, which the state cannot easily or even see. In this respect, the state also tries to make the cash to people taxable.

And you can already take a look at every account transaction today. And of course, that would be the case again when digital central bank money is spent and when people accept it. And of course, everything that is available to other personal data about health, about places of residence,

über das, was man liest, wie man sich ernährt, etc. Ein Datensatz, an den der Staat bzw. diejenigen, die den Staat für ihre Zwecke einspannen wollen,

They want to get all this data. In this respect, I think it is very, very problematic to give the state the opportunity to offer a digital wallet only voluntarily and then to make it mandatory sooner or later. So here too I see very big dangers for the freedom of the individual that the state is trying to remove and destroy.

And what would these solutions be? That means, if I want to protect my assets, for example, if I would get it out of state control, what would be the solutions where you would say, okay, I would put it on it? Yes, that's a question like that. What should the portfolio look like? How many shares should I invest in A, B and C? That always depends on which goals you have, which possibilities are open to you.

But everything that is traded in the financial markets, whether that's loans, bonds or stocks or

ETFs, ultimately the state can see that, it already sees that, it can control that, it can also tend to confiscate that. So in principle, I think, to keep its assets in stocks, especially in America, I think is useful. Of course, selected titles, not per se every stock. But I think freedom has a chance in the future.

in the United States of America than here in the Eurozone. You can then also set up and entertain accounts in other jurisdictions accordingly. So, for example, in Switzerland there are other jurisdictions where this makes sense. But as I said, if the state wants to intervene, it will do so. Otherwise, it is the vote with the feet that probably makes the most

Yes.

Yes, that's why I'm in Mexico now and not in Germany. Maybe the very last question. This is the last time we've gone deeper into the conversation. What is your current assessment of Bitcoin? How do you see it? And I also know that the last time we spoke, it was not yet integrated in the BOOM and BUST report. Then you said, okay, you're now integrating it into the BOOM and BUST report. How do you see this currently?

At this point I would like to point out that I have been in the business for many, many years, basically for 25 years, working on what we are discussing now. And the last 15 years, basically since the beginning of the pandemic,

Bitcoin.

...

something else and a very short announcement if you want to protect your assets from inflation, deflation and theft, then take a look at the link below to 21 bitcoin that is the best and easiest way to buy bitcoin in europe here with the code bitcoin hotel there are still up to 21 percent on the fees when buying bitcoin is really such

The link is below. And if you are still looking for an optimal way to store your Bitcoins, then I definitely recommend a hardware wallet. Everyone should have dealt with such a hardware wallet before. Because your coins can be hacked on stock exchanges very easily. They can sometimes be stolen. We have already seen that in the past. If you have such a hardware wallet, then you are really here

self-sufficient. I always recommend the Tracer Hardware Wallet. I'll also put a link below. I use the Tracer Hardware Wallet itself. It is open source. It has an open source secure element. It is quantum ready and much more. With Kurt Bitcoin Hotel there is also a discount. And there was the Bitcoin just a possible future option. And I think the Bitcoin has come to stay. So I think that's a unit that

for certain dispositions brings advantages. And it is, however, an open question whether he will actually become world money or whether there will be other candidates.

The competition is known to be a discovery process. In this respect, I can't tell you how it will go. There are of course different opinions. The Bitcoin enthusiasts think it will be the Bitcoin. The gold friends think it will be the gold. You will see which medium makes the race.

But it is of course quite clear that the state will try to keep its fiat money with teeth and claws, possibly with further regulatory deterrent measures. So you think, for example, in Germany, the planned taxation of the course winners. That is also such an intervention by which the...

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

If you've internalized that, then think about the second step: How do I do it? What are the feasible alternatives? And there, for example, I try to get the readers in my boom and bust report

to give the insights, to present the thoughts that he needs to make the right decisions for his individual portfolio. Could you maybe just briefly go into that if someone is interested in the "Boom and Bust Report"? That means, what exactly do you get there? What are the analyses that are included there? And for whom is that? And for whom is that maybe nothing?

The best information can be found on the website www.boom-bust-report.com. This publication is published 14 days a week. What I try to do is to provide clarification with a view to relevant and interesting things that actually help the investor.

the right decisions to make. And there is always a section, for example, we are looking for inflation-resistant business models, i.e. companies that can continue to operate successfully if the value of the currency disappears. And so we try to selectively identify the titles that come into question and also address the question of evaluation. Does it make sense to buy now? Is it too expensive? Is it too cheap?

We take the reader, the investor, into our hands and I think he reads something highly interesting and highly relevant, which helps him to make really good decisions. Yes, very, very interesting. Then we will definitely link everything below. If you are interested, then feel free to check it out. Is there any other information that we need to know about you? Link books, we will of course also link everything. Is there anything else that I forgot?

We have worked so much in our interview. I would like to say again, thank you for the clarification work that you do. I think that is very important in the times in which we live.

...

Thank you.

so that people can understand it. And especially in the money area, enlightenment is still important. Because ultimately it is only through this enlightenment that it is possible to change the ideas in people's heads and to contribute to the fact that the world can get better again at some point.

Yes, thank you very much for the great closing words. Of course, I can only give them back. So they are an absolute legend in the, let's say, liberal movement. And I follow them, of course, for a very, very long time. They just keep on being the way they are. And it's very, very valuable that there are such people. And I thank you for being here. And people, thank you for watching. And we'll see you next time. Until then. Peace out.