Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

One Has To Die: The Earth or Capitalism

21:401,221 summary words · ~6 min readEnglishBy WisecrackTranscribed Jun 18, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

Systemic ecological collapse cannot be resolved within a capitalist framework of infinite growth; solving the climate crisis requires liberating society from market logic, either by nationalizing renewable energy or pursuing a post-capitalist 'degrowth communism' that prioritizes collective well-being and reduced labor.

It reframes the climate crisis from an individual moral failing or a technological hurdle into an ontological struggle over how society values time, resources, and human existence outside the paradigm of capital accumulation.

Section summaries

0:00-2:00

Exxon's Blame Game and the Myth of Consumer Sovereignty

watch

The video opens with ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods asserting that consumers, rather than fossil fuel companies, are responsible for slow climate action because they refuse to pay extra for lower-carbon fuels. This narrative aligns with neoliberal free-market logic, which shifts moral accountability away from corporate entities onto individual consumer choice. The host counters this claim by citing estimates that just 57 companies are linked to 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 2016, illustrating how market logic gaslights the public.

  • Corporate leadership leverages market rationality to conceptualize ecological destruction as a failure of consumer demand rather than an inherent feature of capital accumulation.
  • The vast majority of global carbon emissions are concentrated among a highly consolidated group of entities, rendering individualized ethical consumption mathematically irrelevant.

Essential setup explaining the ideological mechanism of corporate responsibility-shifting.

2:00-6:00

The Cultural Hegemony of Capitalist Realism

watch

Building on Fredric Jameson's adage that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism, the video dissects how media and political apparatuses marginalize climate activism. Activists are framed as irrational disruptors while profit-maximizing CEOs are treated as pragmatic realists. This section also highlights political apathy in Western democracies, where escalating rent and stagnating wages force voters to prioritize immediate economic survival over long-term planetary health.

  • Capitalist realism constrains the cultural imagination, framing infinite economic growth as an unalterable natural law and climate survival as a radical outlier.
  • Economic precarity under late capitalism operates as a systemic barrier to collective climate action by forcing immediate, short-term material concerns to the forefront.

Connects the psychological and systemic gridlocks of neoliberal politics to daily life.

6:00-10:00

Neoliberalism as Religion and the Corporate Propaganda Machine

optional

The video conceptualizes neoliberalism as a secular religion where free markets and individual choice form an untouchable theology. To protect this dogma, the fossil fuel industry runs massive propaganda campaigns, which include lobbying governments, funding academic research at institutions like Princeton, and using media brand studios to greenwash their image. These campaigns go so far as to frame petroleum as a biological necessity for healthcare and human connection. This section introduces Yellow Dot Studios as a media counterweight to this pervasive greenwashing.

  • Neoliberal policies operate like religious dogmas, allowing companies to offload moral externalities onto consumers while receiving massive state subsidies.
  • Corporate propaganda has deeply captured both academic research and mainstream journalism, transforming objective news outlets into brand channels for carbon emitters.

Provides excellent context on corporate greenwashing, but spends time on an administrative sponsor transition.

10:00-12:00

Alternative 1: De-privatizing the Renewable Energy Sector

watch

This section explores geographer Brett Christophers' proposal to take renewable energy entirely out of the private sector and convert it into a state-funded enterprise. Christophers argues that private firms do not drill because they love oil, but because fossil fuels yield far higher profit margins than highly subsidized renewable energy projects. By decommodifying energy infrastructure and treating it as a public good, state-led investment can prioritize ecological stabilization over quarterly shareholder returns.

  • The market logic of capital will never naturally pivot to renewables because green energy does not offer the hyper-profitability required by financial markets.
  • Taking energy out of the capital-accumulation cycle and placing it under public ownership is a necessary step to accelerate decarbonization.

Introduces the first major structural policy alternative to market-driven green capitalism.

12:00-16:00

Alternative 2: Saito's Marxist Degrowth and the Communism of Abundance

watch

Moving beyond state-capitalist reforms, the video introduces Kohei Saito's concept of 'degrowth communism,' which utilizes late-stage Marxist texts to advocate for a planned reduction in energy and resource use. Saito critiques standard green solutions—like electric vehicles or carbon offsets—as modern 'indulgences' that allow the Global North to maintain its exploitative 'imperial mode of living' at the expense of the Global South. Saito's vision of communism is not state-enforced scarcity, but an abundance of common wealth, guaranteeing universal access to basic needs.

  • Green growth strategies function as modern ideological distractions, preserving consumerist lifestyles by outsourcing ecological destruction to the Global South.
  • A genuine post-capitalist ecology requires shifting production goals from exchange value (profitability) to use value (human and planetary survival).

Explains the core intellectual and philosophical crux of degrowth and its challenge to the ideology of green growth.

16:00-19:00

Implementing Degrowth via Shorter Work Weeks and Communal Autonomy

watch

To bridge the gap between abstract theory and reality, Saito suggests pursuing 'revolutionary realpolitik' through gradual reforms that alter daily consciousness and behavior. Examples include municipal initiatives like planting fruit trees in Copenhagen, establishing urban farms in Detroit, and forming worker cooperatives. Crucially, Saito emphasizes labor reform—specifically the reduction of the workweek to 25 hours—as a way to directly curb industrial overproduction while restoring time for non-commodified human activities and leisure.

  • Gradual reforms that challenge the temporal constraints of capital, such as the 4-day or 3-day workweek, serve as practical entry points for broader systemic transformation.
  • Reclaiming common spaces and creating non-market cooperative structures helps erode the psychological monopoly of capitalist realism.

Outlines concrete, non-utopian steps to realize degrowth on both local and regional scales.

19:00-21:00

Conclusion: Reclaiming Human Time from Capitalist Extraction

optional

The video wraps up by synthesizing these systemic critiques, urging viewers to reject the guilt-tripping narratives of corporate CEOs. While individual lifestyle changes cannot reverse structural climate change on their own, reclaiming human time from the extraction of surplus value is presented as a radical act. The host directs viewers to a collaborative interview on Yellow Dot Studios' channel to discuss active strategies to combat fossil fuel corporations before ending with a simple plea to slow down, work less, and rest.

  • The climate struggle is intimately tied to the labor struggle; reducing work hours is a dual blow against environmental over-exploitation and human alienation.
  • While personal lifestyle changes are structurally insufficient, slowing down and resting represents an existential rejection of the relentless self-optimization demanded by late capitalism.

Combines final takeaways with a call to action to visit the partner channel for Part 2.

Key points

  • The Indulgence of Green Consumerism — Individual eco-actions, such as buying paper straws or driving electric vehicles, function as modern secular 'indulgences.' They soothe moral anxiety regarding consumption while leaving the systemic engine of capitalist exploitation untouched.
  • De-privatizing the Energy Transition — Geographer Brett Christophers argues that private firms naturally chase high-profit margins rather than ecological survival, making public ownership of renewable energy essential.
  • Saito's Communism of Abundance — Philosopher Kohei Saito proposes a degrowth communism where 'abundance' is redefined not as infinite commodity production, but as the decommodification of basic human needs like housing, healthcare, and time.
  • Revolutionary Realpolitik through Reclaiming Time — Radical systemic transformation can begin gradually through reforms like a 25-hour workweek, which systematically alters daily consciousness and decouples life from continuous extraction.
Exxon has lower carbon fuels ready to go but consumers are simply too cheap to pay for them Darren Woods
these Good deeds are meaningless in the end they can even cause more harm than good Kohei Saito

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:03

okay guys I got to know who's

0:05

responsible for climate change well

0:07

according to Daren Woods the CEO of

0:09

Exxon it's you because you're not voting

0:13

with your dollars we have opportunities

0:15

to make fuels with lower carbon in it

0:17

but people aren't willing to spend the

0:18

money to do that Exxon has lower carbon

0:20

fuels ready to go but consumers are

0:22

simply too cheap to pay for them but you

0:24

know the real bad guys here are uh you

0:27

guessed it activists society as a whole

0:30

hasn't been doing enough of it and

0:31

frankly uh society and I'd say the the

0:34

activists the dominant voice in this

0:36

discussion have tried to exclude the

0:39

industry that has the most capacity and

0:42

the highest potential for helping with

0:45

that some of this Technologies the oil

0:46

companies want to save us we just won't

0:48

let them as you can imagine reactions to

0:51

this were not great as climate Economist

0:54

gnet Wagner put it it's like a drug lord

0:56

blaming everyone but himself for drug

0:59

problems but in fairness the logic used

1:01

by Woods makes sense at least according

1:03

to the rationality of the free market

1:05

which liberates corporations from

1:07

government oversight facilitates

1:09

Innovations and enables consumer Freedom

1:11

by this reasoning it's up to us to

1:14

consume our way to a better world flush

1:17

with electric cars solar panels and

1:19

eco-friendly sandals under this Paradigm

1:21

a corporation's sole imperative is to

1:23

generate profits for shareholders which

1:25

is why Woods is especially critical of

1:27

exxon's activist investors who have

1:29

proposed that the company aggressively

1:31

cut back on fossil fuel production

1:33

activists that hijack that process a

1:35

legitimate process and frankly abuse it

1:38

to advance an ideology that's

1:41

inconsistent with the well-being of the

1:43

company now it's frustrating of course

1:45

to hear the CEO of a behemoth fossil

1:47

fuel company imply that the slow

1:49

response to climate change is our fault

1:51

you know especially when we know that

1:53

according to some estimates 57 companies

1:55

are linked to 80% of global greenhouse

1:57

gas emissions since 2016 but getting gas

2:00

lit by an oil Mogul isn't just annoying

2:03

when Woods shifts blame onto consumers

2:05

he distracts from the real forces behind

2:08

climate change meanwhile his framing

2:09

suggests that mitigating its effects

2:11

could be a hopeless Pursuit especially

2:13

when Solutions are framed around

2:15

consumption and profit rather than you

2:17

know a reorganizing Society to

2:18

prioritize Humanity over fossil fuel

2:21

consumption it could feel a bit like to

2:23

paraphrase the famous quote by Frederick

2:24

Jameson it's easier to imagine the end

2:26

of the world than the end of climate

2:28

change under capitalism real quick quick

2:30

note to say that there's not going to be

2:32

time for us to convince you that climate

2:33

change is real today you can check out

2:35

the recent ipcc report for that uh if

2:37

you think it's not real just watch this

2:39

video as a fun exercise guess to

2:42

yourself throughout it just go oh really

2:44

to everything I say instead today we're

2:46

going to examine why things feel so

2:48

hopeless and consider some solutions

2:50

offered by recent theorists including a

2:53

philosopher who thinks that the best

2:55

thing that you can do to save the planet

2:56

is work less uh and spend more time

2:58

hiking cooking maybe playing guitar with

3:01

your friends so let's see if it might

3:03

just be possible to imagine the end of

3:05

capitalism without the end of the world

3:08

as Florence in the machine note It's

3:10

always darkest before the dawn so before

3:12

we tell you how things are going to get

3:14

better let's start by figuring out how

3:15

things have gotten so bad now when we

3:17

listen to CEOs and politicians explain

3:20

climate change to us it can feel like

3:22

everyone is the hot dog guy from that I

3:24

think you should leave sketch we're all

3:25

trying to find the guy who did this and

3:28

give him a spanking and even wor it

3:30

feels like the guys who drove the hot

3:32

dog car through our window are now the

3:33

ones trying to offer us exciting new

3:35

solutions to fix that very window now we

3:38

discussed this in a recent video but

3:40

both the fossil fuel industry and

3:41

climate change deniers have used all the

3:43

tools of propaganda to control cultural

3:45

and media narratives and that's how we

3:47

end up in a situation where the media

3:49

treats these guys like normal business

3:51

dudes have an energy system today that

3:54

has the the mix that it has and you

3:56

can't change this overnight and this

3:58

person like a radical outlier entire

4:01

ecosystems are collapsing we are in the

4:05

beginning of a mass extinction and all

4:08

you can talk about is money and fairy

4:11

tales of Eternal economic growth CEOs

4:14

are rational agents motivated by the

4:16

principles of market economics tunberg

4:18

is irrational for claiming that Humanity

4:21

should be prioritized over profit but

4:23

even if media narratives fall in One

4:25

Direction don't we still have some

4:27

agency in what and who we vote for for

4:30

Americans are more concerned than ever

4:31

about the climate catastrophe but we

4:33

still tend to vote on more urgent issues

4:36

like the economy or healthare when your

4:38

rent is soaring and your wages are

4:39

tumbling it's hard to worry too much

4:41

about melting glaciers in Greenland and

4:43

as this current US presidential campaign

4:45

cycle heats up faster than the North

4:47

Atlantic we've barely heard any

4:49

discussion of climate policy we've

4:51

barely heard discussion of anything cuz

4:53

one guy yells and the other guy mumbles

4:55

and it's hard to really make anything

4:57

out of it even supposedly Progressive

4:59

politicians know all of this and act

5:00

accordingly like when liberal hero Diane

5:03

Feinstein scolded a bunch of child

5:05

activists for asking her to help with

5:07

climate change which is why it can feel

5:09

like the only recourse we have is our

5:12

own consumption habits but guys let me

5:14

tell you a secret um here in Los Angeles

5:16

I see so many hybrid cars and electric

5:19

cars and reusable water bottles with

5:21

cool stickers on them and eco-friendly

5:23

tote bags and yet every summer is is the

5:25

hottest summer ever so if the media is a

5:27

propaganda tool and consumer choice

5:29

aren't moving the needle and politicians

5:31

are more or less just dropping a double

5:33

decker on the planet before they die

5:35

well then maybe it's time for some

5:37

Bolder actions but when climate

5:39

activists spray paint Stonehenge or

5:41

interrupt the golf tournaments they're

5:42

largely just seen as troublemakers and

5:44

in the case of the recent golf

5:45

tournament Spectators started chanting

5:48

USA USA as police arrested the activist

5:52

which I guess implies that the opposite

5:55

of climate action is the USA now all of

5:58

this seems like it leads to one of two

6:00

things either we're so dejected by all

6:02

this that we end up feeling both

6:04

hopeless and helpless and just lie in

6:06

bed consuming content until we die or it

6:09

can push us towards more drastic action

6:11

like those outlined by scholar Andreas

6:13

mman his book how to blow up a pipeline

6:15

if you don't really like reading books

6:17

it actually got turned into a Hollywood

6:19

picture that you could watch now in one

6:20

of our recent videos we argued that

6:22

neoliberalism is so ideologically

6:25

ingrained into our culture that's

6:27

basically a sort of religion and in the

6:29

churches of neoliberalism free markets

6:31

limited government intervention and

6:33

individual Choice are like the father

6:35

Son and Holy Spirit wealthy fossil fuel

6:38

companies face little regulation and are

6:40

often aided by government subsidies

6:42

operating under cold hard Market logic

6:44

they effectively offload moral

6:46

responsibility onto consumers like how

6:48

Exxon got government subsidies to

6:49

develop energy efficient alternatives

6:51

for the future while they just continue

6:53

to pump out fossil fuels and you know

6:55

just like all the fossil fuels in our

6:57

soil this sh runs pretty deep there's t

6:59

tons of overlap between the fossil fuel

7:01

industry and our political system take

7:03

notable American Sniper and former Vice

7:05

President Dick Cheney he was the CEO of

7:08

halberton which is an oil service

7:09

company before he served our nation by

7:12

becoming George W Bush's co-pilot and

7:14

fossil fuel lobbyists work to influence

7:16

policy at basically every level of the

7:18

government at the time of filming this

7:19

video

7:21

35,41

7:23

294 has been spent on oil lobbying this

7:26

year with yearly averages normally

7:28

Landing closer to $125 million they also

7:32

fund studies and scientific research

7:34

which encourage scientists to greenwash

7:36

their destruction of the planet

7:38

aggressively fight against some of the

7:42

science uh yes this includes companies

7:45

like BP forming intimate relations with

7:48

universities like Princeton donating at

7:50

least $700 million over 10 years but

7:53

unlike most intimate relations were the

7:55

people getting screwed and they pay

7:57

prominent media sources to create paid

7:59

content extolling the virtues of the

8:01

fossil fuel industry and that's why I

8:03

wanted to stop and tell you really quick

8:04

about the new Chevron cares uh program

8:07

that were sponsored by Chevron wants to

8:09

let all of you that's that's not a real

8:11

thing according to a report by drilled

8:13

even the most trusted news outlets run

8:16

internal brand Studios that create

8:18

content for major companies including

8:20

the fossil fuel industry often virtually

8:22

indistinguishable from hard news this

8:25

content packages corporate narratives to

8:27

look like objective media now one

8:28

particularly Wild example is Reuters

8:30

hosting Summits for the fossil fuel

8:32

industry which aims to remove the pain

8:34

points holding back faster production of

8:36

oil and gas that's to say nothing of the

8:39

massive advertising and marketing

8:40

budgets they spend convincing you that

8:42

we really need that oil okay so check

8:44

out this commercial which straight up

8:46

says that if we didn't have oil you

8:48

wouldn't be able to go to the hospital

8:50

you and your unborn baby would probably

8:52

die without oil and gas hospitals

8:53

wouldn't have what they need to keep us

8:57

healthy heal wounds

9:00

save lives and deliver little bundles of

9:03

joy we check out this one which I swear

9:05

to God tries to convince you that if the

9:07

oil industry didn't exist you would

9:09

never get to [ __ ] again that connection

9:11

was brought to by petroleum products so

9:13

is there anything left for us to do

9:15

other than hope that we can get jobs

9:16

writing funny commercials for oil

9:18

companies I'm going to tell you after

9:19

the break but I wanted to take a second

9:21

to shout out our friends over at yellow

9:24

dot Studios who are helping us make this

9:26

video today now if you haven't heard of

9:27

yellow dot they are immed company

9:30

founded by Adam McKay uh the guy who

9:32

probably made some of your favorite

9:33

movies of all time we're men okay that

9:37

means a few things we go on riverb

9:39

gambling trips we make our own beef

9:41

jerky that's what we do now what they do

9:44

is use comedy and media to spread

9:46

Awareness on the reality of climate

9:47

change hey everybody you know your house

9:51

your house is about to be part of the

9:53

ocean and they made some very funny and

9:56

good stuff featuring people you like a

9:58

lot you can definitely check out now at

10:00

the end of this video I'm going to tell

10:02

you to head over to Yellow Dot's channel

10:04

for part two where I'm going to sit down

10:05

with their director Stacy Robert Steel

10:07

and we're going to have a chat about how

10:09

we can fight back against the fossil

10:11

fuel Ghouls and we're going to learn

10:13

more about the work that yellow dot is

10:14

doing so be sure to stick around for

10:17

that once you get over there be sure to

10:19

subscribe to Yellow dos page and keep up

10:21

with what they're doing okay so let's

10:22

get back to feeling pretty bad about the

10:25

future of the planet now it might seem

10:27

like the fossil fuel industry and

10:28

capitalist is M are like the Ben and JLo

10:31

of corporate political power but the

10:32

good news is that Ben and JLo are

10:34

getting divorced and some contemporary

10:36

philosophers in academics are arguing

10:38

that there are viable alternatives to

10:40

this increasingly hot [ __ ] show I guess

10:43

increasingly hot [ __ ] show can refer

10:45

either to the boiling of the planet or

10:47

Ben and JLo having incredibly hot

10:50

breakup sex these Alternatives go Way

10:52

Beyond simply taxing corporations more

10:54

or subsidizing electric vehicles now one

10:57

option which is proposed by economic GE

10:59

rher Brett Christophers in his new book

11:01

is removing the Renewables Market from

11:03

the private sector and then making it a

11:05

state-funded Enterprise as he writes in

11:07

a recent SAA for time Western

11:09

government's renewable subsidies rarely

11:11

occasion strong profits more commonly

11:13

they allow just about sufficient profit

11:14

to keep the sector afloat he cites

11:16

Warren Buffett who admitted that his

11:18

firm Berkshire hathway only Built wind

11:20

farms for the tax credit Christopher

11:22

points out that there isn't a huge moral

11:24

component to the structure of the fossil

11:26

fuel industry simply follows the logic

11:28

of Campus as he writes the likes of

11:30

Exxon and Chevron continue predominantly

11:33

to drill for hydrocarbons instead of

11:34

investing in Renewables not because they

11:37

and their Executives especially love oil

11:39

but because they love money you know cuz

11:42

these guys like if the brains of babies

11:44

made cars go they would start an

11:45

orphanage and you'd never see the kids

11:47

again but rather than radically

11:49

overthrowing capitalism Christophers

11:51

proposes taking renewable energies out

11:53

of the market and then making them

11:54

public goods in doing so the value of

11:57

these energies wouldn't hinge on stock

11:59

value but I'm protecting the future of

12:01

humanity and as Christophers sees it

12:03

only the state has the necessary

12:05

financial and administrative capacity to

12:07

increase Global investment in solar and

12:09

wind energy at the pace needed so while

12:11

we don't need to undo capitalism as such

12:14

we got to take renewable energies out of

12:16

the capitalist market now at this point

12:18

I bet some of you are thinking oh yeah

12:20

so the same government which seems like

12:21

they can't even tie their own shoes

12:23

they're going to somehow fund and

12:25

develop renewable energy at a rapid clip

12:28

sure boss sure others of you might be

12:30

thinking that this solution doesn't push

12:33

against the dominance of the market

12:35

enough and some of you might still be

12:37

thinking about that extra hot Ben and

12:39

JLo divorce sex and to you I salute you

12:43

okay so let's consider another large

12:45

scale and controversial approach to

12:47

fighting against climate change and the

12:49

economic structures that enable it it's

12:51

called degrowth which economic

12:53

Anthropologist Jason hickle defines as a

12:55

planned reduction of energy and resource

12:57

use designed to bring the economy back

12:59

into balance with the Living World in a

13:01

way that reduces inequality and improves

13:03

human well-being while not A New Concept

13:05

de's most contemporary Advocate is

13:08

Japanese philosopher Koo author of slow

13:11

down the degrowth manifesto utilizing

13:13

some lesser-known works of Carl marks

13:15

Theo argues for a new type of degrowth

13:18

Communism in which everything from

13:20

production to labor hours slow down to

13:22

reverse the effects of climate change

13:24

Jordan Peterson you better not be

13:25

watching right now because this is all

13:27

going to make you real mad for seito the

13:29

political solutions to climate change

13:30

offered by the green New Deal along with

13:33

individual practices like driving

13:35

electric cars and using paper straws are

13:37

little more than the new opiates of the

13:40

masses he writes what kinds of measures

13:43

are you taking personally to prevent

13:44

global warming have you bought a

13:46

reusable shopping bag to reduce your

13:47

Reliance on disposable plastic ones do

13:49

you carry a thermos so you don't end up

13:51

buying drinks in plastic bottles did you

13:53

buy an electric car let me make one

13:55

thing clear from the start these Good

13:56

Deeds are meaningless in the end they

13:58

can even cause more harm than good he

14:01

argues that these policies and practices

14:03

function like Catholic indulgences

14:04

allowing us to escape the pangs of our

14:06

conscience about consumerism and look

14:08

away from the real imminent danger

14:09

around us which in turn allows the

14:12

forces of capital to swaddle our

14:14

concerns in environmental impact

14:16

statements and tuck them away beneath

14:18

the form of deception known as

14:19

greenwashing this is because these forms

14:21

of resistance are all completely

14:23

compatible with the same economic system

14:25

that benefits from the fossil fuel

14:27

industry A system that Cito argues

14:29

enables us to enjoy the Imperial mode of

14:32

living which is how he describes the way

14:33

in which the consumption focused

14:35

lifestyles of those in the global North

14:37

is dependent on the economic and

14:39

ecological exploitation of those in the

14:41

global South his lifestyle is predicated

14:43

on infinite growth that comes at a very

14:46

real cost this leads Saito to infuse his

14:48

plan for degrowth with a Marxist

14:50

analysis of class antagonisms and social

14:53

relations but unlike those who might be

14:55

scared of marks or associate his work

14:57

with Soviet Style communism and

14:59

state-led deprivation SEO argues for a

15:02

communism of abundance as he reads marks

15:06

when he talks about abundance he doesn't

15:08

mean having lots of stuff but what he

15:09

does mean is creating the conditions for

15:12

everyone to have a good life you know

15:14

stuff like Medical Care Transportation

15:16

housing food water all these things

15:18

guaranteed and free Sao opposes this to

15:20

Market environmentalism which promises

15:22

an end to climate change that will still

15:24

boost the economy now like Christopher

15:26

syo thinks that it's pretty absurd to

15:28

expect the profit centered logic of the

15:30

market to really prioritize a shift to

15:31

renewable energy and they both think

15:33

that there's no way to just capitalism

15:35

our way out of climate change and for

15:37

seito this means that we don't just need

15:39

to slow down our industrial production

15:41

but also the production and consumption

15:43

of media especially those which

15:45

perpetuate our culture of consumption so

15:47

sorry Kardashians you're not getting

15:49

renewed once Dr SEO takes over as the

15:52

Zar of all media now as he writes

15:54

production focusing on status symbols

15:56

and luxury goods on advertising and

15:58

brand in while ignoring use value spells

16:01

death in an age of climate crisis there

16:02

are so many vital issues to be addressed

16:04

guaranteeing universal access to Food

16:06

Water electricity shelter and

16:08

transportation combating Rising tithe

16:10

and flooding protecting ecology and so

16:12

on we must prioritize the production of

16:15

things necessary to respond to the

16:16

crisis not things whose worth resides

16:19

only in their capacity to produce value

16:21

I mean one upside to all this is less

16:23

ads for stuff that you don't need on

16:25

YouTube also none of those like tech

16:27

review channels things like that that a

16:29

lot less influencers I don't know it

16:30

sounds pretty good now Christophers and

16:32

syto might Inspire some hope but they

16:34

both do involve a pretty radical shift

16:36

away from our current system we might be

16:38

able to imagine a world in which

16:39

Christopher's policy suggestions were

16:41

taken on by some Western governments and

16:43

renewable energy is able to take off as

16:45

a publicly owned industry however we

16:47

might worry that even if a few major

16:49

Nations made those shifts it might not

16:51

really be enough and it could be even

16:53

harder to imagine seo's degrowth

16:55

communism in action as the seword often

16:57

makes folks imagine a violent revolution

16:59

led by angry men with beards but for

17:02

those of us not quite ready to do a

17:03

revolution SEO makes clear that what he

17:06

envisions is not a reboot of the Russian

17:08

Revolution which he doesn't think would

17:10

magically just change the economic

17:12

system instead what he advocates for is

17:14

something more gradual writing what's

17:16

more realistic is Rosa luxenberg's idea

17:19

of revolutionary real politic through

17:21

reform taxing the rich to introduce a

17:23

maximum income for example reforms and

17:25

policies can bring a lot of changes in

17:27

our daily perception and Behavior even

17:29

though it doesn't overcome capitalism

17:31

immediately but changing our

17:33

Consciousness and behavior in daily life

17:35

creates more room for demanding more

17:36

radical changes he also suggests

17:38

thinking about degrowth on a more local

17:40

scale and a lot of his favorite examples

17:42

are things that involve actions that are

17:44

communal rather than individual he cites

17:46

communities in Detroit that took

17:48

advantage of falling land values to turn

17:50

large swats of the city into urban farms

17:52

and a policy put into action in

17:53

Copenhagen to plant fruit trees all over

17:56

the city to start making food freely

17:58

available and he knows notes that

17:59

policies like this can then have

18:00

Downstream effects because you probably

18:02

don't want your Apple to taste like

18:04

engine exhaust so then you might want to

18:06

expand the already robust bicycle Lanes

18:08

in Copenhagen Theo's ideas for how we

18:10

can meaningfully make change run the

18:12

gamut from starting workers co-ops to

18:15

organizing School strikes from

18:17

volunteering for environmental NOS to

18:19

running for local office all pretty

18:21

doable things if you've done one of

18:22

these things let us know in the comments

18:24

if you want to do any of these things

18:26

tell us and let us support you and he

18:27

thinks these actions can create

18:29

Lifestyles less centered on production

18:31

and consumption and more focused on

18:33

letting us just be humans you know the

18:35

upside of less shopping is more time to

18:37

hang out and figure out what you're into

18:38

and maybe the best part of this idea uh

18:40

is that he imagines a world where we

18:42

have to work less Saito argues that one

18:44

of the biggest contributions to degrowth

18:46

can take place in reforming our

18:48

workplaces through labor unions

18:50

demanding our employers Institute

18:52

environmentally friendly policies and

18:53

advocating for here it is folks shorter

18:56

work weeks he writes that right now we

18:58

work 5 days a week and often more than

19:01

40 hours we could immediately reduce

19:03

that to 4 days with Technologies I think

19:05

we could go down to three in the future

19:07

so that's a 25h hour work week what will

19:09

we do with all this new time we will

19:11

spend more time with family we will

19:13

Garden we might do Sports we will do

19:15

some volunteering and have some

19:16

political engagement in the planning of

19:18

what we produce and what our local

19:19

government do we will commute not by car

19:21

but by bus and Tra and our workplace

19:23

will be more horizontal we should have

19:25

more job rotation should not always be

19:27

the same person doing the best part of

19:29

the job and then some people cleaning

19:30

their clothes with new technologies we

19:32

can share more and rotate jobs let me

19:35

know what you would do with more time

19:36

imagine that 25h hour work week what

19:38

else are you doing I'm probably watching

19:40

a lot more movies hopefully reading more

19:43

playing music a lot and probably making

19:45

more elaborate recipes like I'm probably

19:46

cooking lunch every day well maybe not

19:49

as easy as drinking a smoothie with a

19:51

paper straw these examples show that

19:52

it's not some absolute either or between

19:55

large scale political Solutions and just

19:57

some ineffective small actions or OPI

20:01

now this doesn't mean that you know if

20:02

we all get to work this weekend we're

20:04

going to reverse climate change but it

20:05

does mean the next time an oil CEO looks

20:08

you in the eye and says climate change

20:09

is your fault you can throw a book at

20:11

him and tell him to read up maybe also

20:13

to suck your di okay so you might be

20:14

thinking this is the part of the video

20:16

where I'm going to tell you to do

20:17

something but it's not really what we do

20:20

uh but this is in the Wheelhouse of our

20:21

friends over at yellow dot so go over to

20:24

their Channel right now and watch part

20:26

two of this video which is my interview

20:28

with yellow dots director Stacy Robert

20:31

Steel there's a link here and a link in

20:33

the description click either one and

20:35

once you're there be sure to subscribe

20:36

to their Channel and leave a comment

20:38

letting them know that we sent you uh

20:40

and if you're still here for some reason

20:42

thank you so much a huge shout out to

20:43

our patrons for all your support if you

20:45

want to support our Channel we have a

20:46

patreon there's a link in the

20:47

description you get videos early without

20:49

ads you get extra audio and video

20:52

content things of that nature you get on

20:53

our Discord server lots of good stuff uh

20:56

thanks in general for just hanging out

20:57

and being here if you are still here why

20:59

don't you ring the bell you know like

21:01

this video subscribe to the channel uh

21:03

but in general I just really hope that

21:05

one day we all work a whole lot less and

21:08

in the meantime I don't know take it

21:10

easy slow down a little bit stop

21:12

consuming so much take a walk drink some

21:15

water take a nap you deserve it I'll see

21:17

you next time

21:19

[Music]

21:29

he

21:31

[Music]

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.