Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

How Simon Black made 100% with his Time Flies options strategy

52:021,377 summary words · ~7 min readEnglishBy Theta ProfitsTranscribed Jul 12, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The 'Time Flies' strategy is a highly resilient, delta-neutral options spread combining a put diagonal and a call broken wing butterfly that systematically captures rapid theta decay over a 6-day average holding period.

It offers systematic options sellers a structured framework to capitalize on the natural asymmetry of market volatility—spiking on downmoves and contracting on upmoves—without needing directional predictions.

Section summaries

0:00-2:38

Introduction & Time Flies Strategy Overview

watch

Host John welcomes back New Zealand-based options trader Simon Black to detail his delta-neutral 'Time Flies' strategy, which cleared a 100% return over the past year. Simon, an electrical and software engineer, describes the trade as a short-term volatility setup requiring minimal management. Because it operates with a 6-day average duration, it fits perfectly for traders who cannot actively monitor the market intraday.

  • The Time Flies strategy is a delta-neutral, short-term premium selling setup.
  • It is designed to be managed once a day, making it highly suitable for busy or timezone-constrained traders.

Provides essential context on Simon's background and the core operational philosophy of the strategy.

2:38-7:54

The Anatomy of a Time Flies Spread

watch

Simon uses OptionStrat to build the basic structural elements of the Time Flies spread from scratch. The trade is an advanced combination of two separate structures: a put diagonal set below current spot price and a call broken wing butterfly (BWB) placed above it. Simon demonstrates how the short expirations on both sides match, while the diagonal's long leg is positioned one week further out to generate a favorable volatility hedge.

  • The trade combines a downside put diagonal with an upside call broken wing butterfly.
  • Short legs on both sides share the same expiration date, while the diagonal long is rolled one week further out.

This is the core architectural breakdown of the strategy, illustrating how the Greek exposures interlock.

7:54-13:10

Underlying Asset Selection & DTE Parameters

watch

Simon highlights his preference for trading the Russell 2000 (RUT) index over SPX due to better margin mechanics on Tastytrade and superior curve profiles. He stresses that index ETFs and cash-settled index options are ideal because they carry zero early assignment risk. Simon specifies that the entry must maintain a minimum of 7 to 14 days to expiration to properly manage the relationship between theta decay and early gamma risk.

  • Cash-settled indexes like RUT or SPX are vastly superior to individual equities for this strategy.
  • The minimum optimal timeframe for entry is 7 to 14 days to expiration; avoid short-dated expirations under 7 days.

Provides critical tactical instructions regarding instrument choice and timing rules.

13:10-17:07

The Art of Visual Curve Optimization

watch

Simon outlines his entry execution process, emphasizing that there is no rigid delta formula because VIX changes weekly. Instead of mechanical entries, he manually adjusts the strikes on OptionStrat to form a smooth, rounded curve directly centered over the current price. When the VIX is low, strikes are kept tighter (around 2.2% away), whereas a higher VIX allows wings to be stretched to 3% or wider for maximum safety margins.

  • Strike selection must adjust dynamically to VIX; higher volatility calls for wider safety margins.
  • Avoid automated rules; instead, manually adjust strike widths until the modeled T+0 line shows a smooth, rounded peak over the spot price.

Explains how to visually balance the spread to achieve optimal delta neutrality.

17:07-22:23

Visualizing Dynamic Peaks & Interlocking Widths

optional

Using his current open position on Russell 2000, Simon shows how simulated time and strike widths modify the overall risk profile of the spread. He explains how widening the call butterfly's strikes pulls its peak higher on OptionStrat, which subsequently lifts the upside of the T+0 curve. Conversely, narrowing the put diagonal pulls up the downside curve, demonstrating how these components act as balanced, opposing tension forces.

  • Widening the broken wing butterfly raises the upside peak of the profit tent.
  • Narrowing the put diagonal strikes pulls up the downside peak, allowing the trader to manually adjust structural skew.

Highly granular simulator walk-through that is valuable for execution but secondary to the core rules.

22:23-28:58

Strict Trade Management & The Thursday Exit Rule

watch

Simon explains his strict exit parameters, targeting a 10% to 20% return on the trade's buying power. He heavily advocates for taking profits early to avoid sudden market reversals. Crucially, he details his non-negotiable rule to exit the trade on Thursday, precisely 24 hours prior to expiration. John shares his own empirical trading log validating this, proving that holding the trade through the final 24 hours introduces extreme gamma risk that can instantly turn winners into major losers.

  • Target a conservative profit of 10% to 20% of buying power and aggressively close the trade when reached.
  • Exit all positions by Thursday afternoon to bypass hyper-volatile final-day gamma and volatility spikes.

Contains the key risk-management and exit protocols that protect trading capital.

28:58-35:33

Downside Defenses & Volatility Hedging

watch

Simon addresses defensive adjustments, which he only needs to execute on 15% to 20% of his trades. When the market drops severely, his primary defense is adding a put calendar or put diagonal using the same expirations as the core trade. This calendar addition captures the spike in implied volatility on the downside. However, Simon cautions that because this adjustment adds cost, a sudden market rebound will drag down the overall profitability of the trade.

  • Manage downside breaches by adding put calendars or diagonals to capture surging implied volatility.
  • Downside adjustments are defensive risk-mitigation tactics meant to minimize damage, not to generate large profits.

Breaks down the mechanical steps and financial trade-offs of defending downside market moves.

35:33-42:08

Upside Adjustments & Peak Risk Metrics

watch

Simon explains upside defenses, noting that upside moves are inherently harder to manage because volatility tends to fall when markets rise. He occasionally deploys call calendars as pinning targets but prefers structuring the trade with a built-in upside skew to reduce cost and risk. He warns that any adjustments must be made early in the week; late adjustments are ineffective and expose the trader to double-losses. Simon assigns the strategy a risk rating of 4 or 5 out of 10.

  • Upside adjustments are more challenging due to volatility crush, making structural upside skews a safer choice.
  • Limit adjustments to the first half of the trade cycle (Monday/Tuesday) to avoid compounding late-stage gamma losses.

Highlights the difficulty of defending upside moves and defines the overall risk scale.

42:08-51:21

Three-Year Trading Performance & Recommended Resources

watch

Simon details his verified, audited trading metrics, showcasing an average annual return of 100% using a conservative capital allocation model. He allocates $3,000 per contract to cushion against worst-case scenario losses, even though the margin required is only ~$1,300. John shares his own trading stats, proving a consistent 80.7% win rate with an average hold time of 5.7 days. Simon concludes by recommending essential books on options math, trading psychology, and fat-tailed market risks.

  • Applying a conservative 3:1 capital-to-margin allocation ratio prevents account ruin during catastrophic tail-risk events.
  • John's independent tracking verified an 80.7% win rate with a 5.33% net profit per trade over a 5.7-day average holding period.
  • Simon's recommended reading: 'The Unlucky Investor's Guide' for options math, 'Trading in the Zone' for discipline, and 'Fooled by Randomness' for understanding fat-tailed market risks.

Provides empirical validation of the strategy's viability along with essential trading psychology resources.

Key points

  • Asymmetric Volatility Hedging Structure — The strategy pairs a put diagonal below the spot price with a call broken wing butterfly above it, matching the short expirations at 7 to 14 days out.
  • The Art of Visual Curve Modeling — Instead of executing via rigid delta rules, the trader must manually adjust strike widths on a visual simulator like OptionStrat to form a perfectly rounded, balanced curve over the current spot price.
  • The Thursday Exit Rule — The strategy mandates closing all positions on Thursday afternoon, precisely 24 hours prior to Friday's expiration, regardless of theoretical profit margins.
  • Conservative Capital Cushioning — To survive black swan events, Simon allocates a flat $3,000 in capital per contract traded, despite the position only requiring roughly $1,300 in actual margin or buying power.
Myself, like many people, aren't very good at predicting market direction, and so I gave up on that a long time ago, and so I'm hoping to for the market to not move much. Simon Black
I learned a long time ago not to try to hold it until the last day. Simon Black

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:00

And again, I'm up about 40% after 4

0:02

months, so it's pretty consistent. So,

0:03

for me, getting more than 5% on a trade

0:06

that is on average lasting less than 6

0:09

days, that's something I'm very happy

0:11

with. Just knocked over 100% return last

0:14

year. 1 year ago, Simon Black presented

0:17

his time flies strategy here on Theta

0:20

Profits.

0:21

Since then, it has become one of my

0:24

favorite strategies to trade, and so

0:27

far, I'm very happy with the results.

0:31

But, strategies evolve. What has Simon

0:35

learned during this last year? Welcome

0:38

back, Simon Black. Hey John, how's it

0:40

going? Great to be back. Uh give us this

0:43

short summary of what a time fly

0:45

strategy is and how it has worked for

0:47

you.

0:48

Yes, so a time fly spread strategy is um

0:51

it's my go-to strategy. It's a delta

0:53

neutral strategy, and it's a short-term

0:55

strategy. So, the strategy lasts about a

0:57

week. So, being a delta neutral

0:59

strategy, it's a kind of strategy I like

1:00

to trade where I don't want the market

1:02

to move much.

1:03

Uh and the nature of the strategy and

1:05

how it's um put together is such that

1:08

um it handles volatility expansions

1:12

and contractions. So, this looks at the

1:14

contractions pretty well. And

1:17

importantly for me, being in a country

1:19

where I'm asleep for half the market,

1:21

it's the kind of trade where I only have

1:23

to look at it once a day. So, that's the

1:26

trade I like to trade. Tell us, who are

1:28

you? Well, as you said, my name's Simon.

1:30

I am in New Zealand, uh capital city

1:33

Wellington. I have an engineering

1:35

background. I'm an electrical engineer

1:36

by trade, and I'm focusing mainly in

1:38

software engineering these days. I have

1:41

always been interested in numbers and

1:42

finance, and I was naturally drawn to

1:46

options trading. Um

1:47

and I just find it fascinating. So, now

1:50

it's kind of it's my hobby, and it's

1:52

sort of my my goal, long-term goal, is

1:54

to stop doing

1:57

this engineering work and and ramp up my

1:59

trading to be a full-time trader.

2:01

But yeah, and then one of my favorite

2:02

hobbies is playing with new strategies,

2:04

inventing new strategies, seeing what's

2:06

what's possible. Um I just love that

2:08

part of it so much. And this is actually

2:10

the first time I had to do a second

2:12

interview interview on the same

2:14

strategy, but this was a very popular

2:17

video on on the channel and I'm sure you

2:20

have developed it further during this

2:22

year and also, as I mentioned, this has

2:25

become one of my own favorite trading

2:27

strategy strategy I really like doing.

2:31

So, I think it's time for an update. But

2:34

let's start with the basic. What are you

2:38

trying to achieve with your time flies

2:40

strategy? So, I'm trying to build a

2:43

trade, um like I mentioned, that it's

2:45

delta neutral. So, if you've traded

2:47

something traded something like an iron

2:49

condor in the past, um you'll know you

2:51

sort of put

2:53

uh a boundary around sort of a central

2:55

point and you want the market to try and

2:57

sort of stay in the middle. Myself, like

3:00

many people, uh

3:01

aren't very good at predicting market

3:03

direction, and so I gave up on that a

3:05

long time ago, and so I'm hoping to for

3:08

the market to not move much. But if the

3:10

market does move, I'm hoping to build a

3:12

trade where the volatility contractions

3:15

and expansions that happen with market

3:16

moves hopefully

3:18

um are taken into account and

3:20

let the trade withstand that a little

3:22

bit. And let's describe the basic trade.

3:25

Maybe it's easier if we bring up an

3:28

example or build a stra- build a trade

3:30

from the beginning. A time flies spread

3:32

is a combination trade of two trades and

3:37

if you've seen me talk about this before

3:38

on your channel, it's two components,

3:40

one of which is a put diagonal and one

3:42

of which is a call broken wing

3:44

butterfly. So, just for reference, it's

3:46

outside market hours, so the pricing

3:48

might be slightly off. It's um

3:51

just before market open uh here, but

3:54

what I'm going to do is I'll go into

3:56

this QQQ. I'll pick

3:58

uh Russell cuz it's my favorite thing to

4:00

trade, the um tight price spread on.

4:03

I'm going to build a put diagonal. So,

4:05

what I'm going to do is I'm going to

4:06

make it

4:08

uh

4:08

this is a Friday expiration. I'm just

4:09

going to change alter this long date to

4:13

be a bit tighter in. And what I'm going

4:15

to do is go um some percentage below the

4:18

market.

4:19

Um so, you can see here this this short

4:22

strike is about a week out, right? So,

4:24

I'll go a little bit below.

4:26

Um I'll I'll just going to go percentage

4:28

in a 2% or so below. Uh let's going to

4:31

go

4:32

somewhere around here, give or take. Um

4:35

and I'm going to drag this. So, a

4:36

diagonal is a is a trade where you sell

4:39

um

4:41

you sell an option and you buy an

4:42

option, but they are different in strike

4:45

and

4:46

and expiration. So, this one is closer

4:48

in.

4:48

That's a shorter time and longer time.

4:50

So, I've always start with this. I don't

4:51

know.

4:53

Let's say 10 wide as an example. So,

4:56

um here is a diagonal. If I just pull

4:58

the range out a bit here,

5:02

and so, this is what a diagonal looks

5:03

like. And so,

5:04

the idea is that

5:06

over time, if the market drop down a

5:09

little bit and volatility what will move

5:12

time forward a bit here,

5:14

the idea is that that um slider could

5:17

move up.

5:19

Um sorry, the time as the slider moves

5:21

forward, it pulls up. Um and so, that's

5:24

sort of what's below the market price.

5:26

And we've mentioned in the past that

5:28

usually when the market starts

5:30

you know, dropping 2 3%, you might get a

5:32

little bit of a volatility increase. So,

5:34

if I drag the vol slider up, you'll see

5:36

that

5:37

it also pulls up. So,

5:40

that's kind of what I put below the

5:42

market. So, let me just reset

5:44

uh of

5:46

Um what I like to do normally when I put

5:47

these trades on is drag the time side

5:49

all the way to sort of 24 hours to go

5:53

cuz that's sort of we'll talk about that

5:54

later about exit criteria, but that's

5:56

sort of where I want to be out of the

5:57

trade um

5:59

by the time I get out. So, that's the

6:00

that's the bottom half. And so, what I

6:02

like to do then is put a trade above the

6:05

market and I want to

6:08

again have a trade that can handle what

6:10

would happen potentially when the market

6:11

starts

6:12

drifting up, which is normally

6:14

volatility might contract a little bit

6:16

when things are good, volatility goes

6:18

down. So, I'll go I mean I'll just pick

6:20

a point yeah, some percentage above the

6:23

market again, maybe a similar amount.

6:25

And this is where you can play and

6:27

decide whether you're bullish or

6:28

bearish, whether you want to

6:30

um, skew it in a certain direction which

6:32

is perfectly possible. So, what I'm

6:33

going to do is do a a broken wing

6:34

butterfly. Um,

6:36

this is sort of a normal kind of

6:37

butterfly. What I'm going to do is make

6:38

it a broken wing butterfly by moving

6:40

this further away. And so, what I'm

6:43

going

6:43

>> broken wing butterfly you have unequal

6:45

distance to That is right. So, as an

6:47

example here, let's just make this so

6:49

it's something we can see. This is 15

6:51

and 30 yeah, 29 15 29 35. So, that's 20

6:54

wide. This one here, let's make it a

6:56

little bit I don't know.

6:58

Like say there somewhere. Um, and now

7:02

what we have is this sort of this is

7:04

sort of the basis of the trade. Now,

7:05

this isn't quite exactly how I would

7:07

get it looking. We'll talk about a

7:08

little bit later about getting the curve

7:10

right, but this is the basic structure

7:12

of this trade and that we have a trade

7:14

below and a trade above. So, we will get

7:16

back to a little bit more how you adjust

7:19

this to get the

7:20

the perfect curve so to speak, but

7:22

essentially to sum up so far, you have a

7:25

put diagonal below the market and you

7:27

have a call broken wing butterfly above

7:30

the market. Yes, and just to clarify

7:33

that the expiration of the short of the

7:35

diagonal matches the expiration of all

7:37

the legs on the broken wing butterfly.

7:40

Let me interrupt with a quick tip if you

7:43

like trading earnings. Earnings trades

7:45

are some of the most exciting

7:47

opportunities in the market, but they

7:50

can also be tricky to do right. Big

7:53

moves, changing volatility, it is not

7:56

always obvious what makes sense.

8:00

There is a great tool to help you with

8:01

that.

8:02

Earnings Watcher.

8:04

It gives you data on upcoming earnings

8:07

like expected moves, historical

8:09

reactions, and volatility patterns.

8:13

And you get tips about the best earnings

8:15

trades to consider right now. So, if you

8:17

like earnings trades, this tool will

8:19

give you the data you need to find and

8:22

evaluate great trades.

8:24

I have a negotiated a special discount

8:27

for the Setup Profits community. 33% off

8:31

the annual plan or 50% off your first

8:34

month.

8:35

You find the discount link below or in

8:38

the description.

8:39

All right. Back to the interview.

8:43

All right. So, let's get a bit more into

8:45

your entry mechanics. Let's start with

8:47

underlying. You mentioned that you your

8:50

favorite underlying is root. Why is that

8:53

and what other underlying could this

8:55

work on? Yes, I initially started

8:58

trading this on SPX and SPX was

9:01

fine and I was doing great and then

9:04

tastytrade changed the margin

9:06

requirements

9:07

such that I couldn't cuz I was trading a

9:09

single contract in a separate account

9:11

for the purposes of record keeping and I

9:13

didn't want to

9:14

change what I was doing. So, I thought

9:15

what if I just what would happen if I

9:17

just moved to the Russell instead, you

9:18

know, Russell and SPX. Obviously, SPX is

9:20

the top 500 companies. Russell 2000 is

9:23

the

9:24

best quote unquote best 2000 small cap

9:26

companies. I thought how different could

9:27

it be? But the moment I started trading

9:29

Russell, I found I could get

9:32

a better looking curve and a wider

9:34

range. Now, the wider range you think

9:37

okay, that's great, but Russell does

9:39

move more than SPX. Like, when the

9:40

market drops

9:42

when SPX drops 2%, Russell might drop

9:45

3%, whatever. But, I just found that I

9:47

was getting good results with Russell.

9:49

And so, in the end, I was like, well,

9:51

this is fine. Why bother going back? To

9:54

be clear, it's still perfectly valid to

9:55

trade it in SPX, and you can definitely

9:57

get trades winning trades, as you you

9:59

know. But, I just like Russell. But, in

10:02

terms of any other underlying as we just

10:05

I just mentioned that this trade is all

10:07

about

10:08

a diagonal below which benefits from a

10:10

volatility increase and a broken

10:12

butterfly above that benefits from a

10:14

volatility decrease. So,

10:16

any instrument's fine where that

10:20

relationship is true. And so, things,

10:22

for example, like trading gold like,

10:25

sometimes when the market's crashing and

10:26

dumping

10:28

and volatility's going up in general

10:29

across the market, the price of gold

10:32

might go up. It's almost

10:33

counterintuitive. And things like the

10:35

bonds, if you trade anything about the

10:37

bonds, volatility can increase in both

10:39

directions. So, it has to be a an

10:41

instrument where

10:43

what we think of as a normal thing where

10:44

ah, it's crashing and burning, vol's

10:46

spiking, or everything's happy, it's

10:47

going up. So, any of the indexes are

10:49

great. I personally like indexes because

10:52

they're cash settled, no no assignment

10:54

risk. But,

10:55

I've traded these in um

10:58

QQQ, which is the

11:01

Nasdaq 100

11:02

ETF. I've traded them in options on

11:05

futures / NQ

11:08

uh / ES and the Russell one as well. So,

11:11

there's a wide variety of instruments

11:13

you can use. What are the days to

11:15

expiration you are using? I've had a lot

11:18

of people who trade this try short-term

11:21

trades, and I also tried

11:22

you know, when I was experimenting

11:23

building this short-term trades. My

11:25

biggest

11:27

tip is it has to be a minimum of 7 days

11:30

to expiration from when you put it on to

11:32

that um

11:33

expiry. You can go longer. When I first

11:36

started this, I was sometimes I was

11:37

trying ones where

11:39

the those shorts were 14 days to

11:40

expiration. I thought maybe further out

11:43

you can get a wider range. Is this

11:45

better? And in the end it I sort of

11:47

discovered that

11:49

that whole window

11:51

of sort of 7 to 14 days gave very

11:54

similar results. So,

11:56

now I personally like to trade

11:57

[clears throat] on um

11:59

it's

12:00

Thursday market time.

12:02

Um for me that's Friday morning. It just

12:03

suits my lifestyle better. There's

12:04

nothing magical about a Thursday. It's

12:06

just what I like to do. So, when I'm

12:08

putting the trade on for the new

12:10

expiring the following Friday. So, for

12:11

me it happens to be 8 days to

12:13

expiration.

12:14

Could be 9 days, 10 days, whatever. And

12:17

then the long is the week after that. Uh

12:20

and you can you can play with that and

12:22

get different curves. But that's sort of

12:24

a I'd say don't try to trade this trade

12:26

less than 7 days. Let's get back to

12:29

options trade. And so, uh what happens

12:32

with this trade when the volatility go

12:34

up and down as you have mentioned a bit.

12:38

Right. So, here is um

12:40

a trade just sitting here. And so, at

12:43

the moment the volatility slider is um

12:46

sort of where the market is at. Um of

12:48

course, if the market started falling

12:52

dramatically for whatever reason,

12:54

there's some big news or whatever, quite

12:56

often volatility spikes. So, if I start

12:59

dragging the vol slider up, what you see

13:01

is the overall quick curve both to the

13:04

upside and to the downside, but

13:05

especially the downside, um starts to

13:08

rise. And the break even at the bottom,

13:10

it wasn't screen before, now it's gone

13:12

completely out of screen. So, what would

13:14

have been a

13:15

whatever 3.5% or whatever break even to

13:18

the downside, a vol spike has made that

13:20

much bigger. So, there's a little bit of

13:22

natural buffering built into the

13:24

downside.

13:25

And just resetting that,

13:27

volatility never really crashes down

13:29

like it spikes up and then just drifts

13:31

down slowly.

13:32

But when news is when things are good, I

13:36

mean, I guess if say the Iran war ended

13:38

tomorrow, maybe vol would really drop,

13:39

but in general vol just gradually goes

13:41

down. So, if the market was just

13:43

gradually moving up and vol was just

13:46

gradually moving down, so imagine this

13:48

price line is moving up and you know,

13:50

sort of slowly moving up. If we start

13:53

dragging the vol slider down, the line

13:55

where the market is now is going to pull

13:57

[clears throat] down. But the

13:59

the tent

14:00

the curve under the tent starts pulling

14:02

up. So,

14:04

if things work nicely, the market drifts

14:07

up,

14:08

and then you end up in a curve end up

14:10

under the tent where

14:13

where the vol decreases sort of giving

14:15

it some help, if that makes sense. I'm

14:18

curious now how you choose your strikes

14:21

and how you kind of define what is the

14:23

best trade to make this week. If you've

14:26

traded

14:27

an iron condor before or something like

14:29

that, you'll know that when volatility

14:31

is high, um

14:33

options are more expensive. And so, the

14:36

options you're selling, you you you get

14:38

more for them, of course. So,

14:40

when volatility is high, you can make

14:42

your strikes

14:44

further out because

14:47

it's just a a wider range. Volatility

14:49

literally means the market is volatile,

14:51

the market could move more. So, my

14:53

strike selection is pretty much and

14:56

there's no magic formula for this, but

14:58

when VIX is quite low, my strikes are

15:00

closer in. You know, maybe I think when

15:04

I put a trade on, I've got a trade I can

15:06

show later, one I'm actually in. I put

15:07

the trade on today.

15:09

Um VIX is about 17 at the moment, which

15:11

is it's not high, definitely, but it's

15:14

not super low. It's sort of

15:16

on the lower side of low. I think I

15:18

decided to go about 2.2, 2.3%. That's

15:21

just an arbitrary number in my head uh

15:24

either side if the VIX was higher in the

15:26

20, 25, I could go much further out of

15:29

maybe 3% above and below. And so,

15:32

what you do find is that

15:34

with getting trying to get the curve

15:36

right is that it it's sort of

15:38

it's sort of self-correcting. If you try

15:40

to go too far away,

15:42

like you try to give it too big a range,

15:44

you get a big sag in the curve in the

15:46

middle. It will make more sense when we

15:48

we really focus on the on the curve

15:49

later. But, um yeah, so I think

15:53

the volatility kind of helps you

15:54

naturally pick it, and the curve helps

15:56

you pick it. If you get it wrong, it you

15:59

you can't get a good curve. So, I think

16:00

the first thing you can try is let's

16:02

move the

16:03

short strikes. It's all about the short

16:04

strike. You get the short strikes kind

16:06

of in the right place,

16:07

the rest are kind of easy. So,

16:09

if you think about it about the short

16:10

strikes a little bit like I'm putting on

16:12

an iron condor,

16:13

where is the market going to going to

16:15

be? It's a good way to think about it.

16:17

You have mentioned the curve if you

16:19

times, and I know that you are very

16:22

concerned that you want to create the

16:24

perfect curve when you open a new trade.

16:27

So, please explain for us how you choose

16:30

your strikes, and what is a perfect

16:33

curve for this trade?

16:36

Well,

16:37

the the perfect curve for me is one that

16:41

gives a nice

16:43

round

16:45

curve, and it sounds so simple. The

16:47

trade on the screen at the moment is an

16:48

actual trade I'm in. I entered it uh

16:51

today. Um if you come back to my website

16:54

later and look at the trading results,

16:55

some point you'll better see how this

16:56

trade worked out. But, what you can see

16:58

with this trade, it's exactly the same

17:00

structure you saw before. There's a put

17:02

broken wing butterfly below, and a call

17:04

broken wing butterfly above. But, what I

17:05

want to do is I'll pull the time slider

17:09

forward. And unlike the last demo where

17:11

the curve kind of

17:13

looked a bit janky, to be fair, it was

17:14

kind of sagging in the middle. As this

17:16

one pulls up, and just to be to be

17:19

perfectly um

17:20

transparent, the market has dropped

17:21

about a percent overnight since I put

17:23

this on outside of hours. But notice

17:25

this curve as I move forward, it's nice

17:27

and round. Like it's it's kind of

17:30

even either side. It's going up and up

17:33

and up. This is the kind of thing I'm

17:35

looking for. I don't want

17:37

And as I get closer to like a day to

17:39

expiration, say 24 hours, it's starting

17:41

to bend a little bit here, just sort of

17:43

here. It's bending here. But almost all

17:46

the way up. It was almost I think I'll

17:48

go back just a little bit where I was.

17:49

Is it so that the further out shorts are

17:53

the the sooner you will get this sagging

17:56

or bending?

17:57

Yeah, I think if you if you move the

18:00

broken wing butterfly too far away, it

18:02

it will sag. And one way to see that

18:05

actually, if I bring the time slider to

18:07

the extreme expiry, right? The reason

18:09

why is this is this this big low point

18:11

here, right? This is clearly the

18:14

This is going to pull it down.

18:15

Right? But leading up to that, if I move

18:18

back a little bit again,

18:20

see how this is kind of nice and round?

18:23

So this is what we're aiming for because

18:25

it gives it a nice range, right? So you

18:28

can sort of see here this trade expires

18:30

on you can see there May 22nd

18:33

and

18:34

with a day and a half to go according to

18:36

the Option Strat. Again, this is all

18:37

theoretical pricing, you know, you can't

18:40

trust exactly Option Strat, but it's a

18:41

guess. But this is sort of showing this

18:43

trade could handle a 3.6%

18:46

jump to the upside and a

18:49

What is it to the downside?

18:51

About 3.8. So it's a a pretty balanced

18:53

trade. So you'll see here this dotted

18:54

line is sort of right in the middle.

18:57

This is a classic delta neutral trade.

18:59

The fact that the curve is the highest

19:01

where the price currently is

19:03

is it shows you how delta neutral this

19:06

is. If if the if the peak of the curve

19:08

was

19:09

either side of where the price is,

19:11

you've either skewed it to the downside

19:13

or the upside, and that's a perfectly

19:15

valid um

19:16

thing. The thing about this trade is

19:17

nothing stops you making this trade

19:20

completely centered

19:21

higher or lower if you have a feeling

19:23

that the market's going up or down.

19:25

I never get those feelings cuz I don't

19:27

know what's going on, so I just try to

19:29

center it and hope that the market can

19:31

last. And so, you want a nice smooth

19:34

round curve.

19:36

You also have those tops of the profit

19:38

attends on the input diagonal on the

19:41

call butterfly. Um

19:43

does that matter how high they are in

19:46

relationship to each other? It it kind

19:48

of does. It it it

19:51

I mean, I think so. I like to think of

19:53

use the analogy before. I like to think

19:55

of

19:56

imagine that green line is a rope

19:59

and those points are pulling that rope

20:02

up. And so, it's

20:04

what you find is this diagonal here,

20:06

this is higher up. It's almost got more

20:08

force. It's going to pull that bit up

20:09

higher. And so, if you find, for

20:11

example, your curve is sagging quite a

20:13

bit,

20:14

say to the upside, you want to make sure

20:17

this this point is up higher. And how do

20:20

you make the point higher

20:22

in a broken wing butterfly? It's quite

20:24

simple. You just make it wider. So, if I

20:26

wanted, just as an example, I'm just

20:28

going to make this wider.

20:31

All right. Now, this is outside market

20:33

hours. It's sort of weird. I'm going to

20:35

try to get it like that. Now, now these

20:37

points this point's higher, right? So,

20:40

it's just, you know,

20:41

it

20:42

you can play with all these sliders to

20:43

to see what you you want to do, but

20:47

definitely

20:48

if you can think about both of these

20:50

trades are trying to pull the curve in a

20:52

different direction, then if it's

20:54

pulling one way or the other, you can

20:56

adjust one way or the other to try to do

20:58

it. Basically,

21:00

it's kind of

21:01

it's almost counterintuitive if you're

21:03

not used to trading these trades. Making

21:04

the the

21:05

widths wider

21:08

we'll pull the butterfly peak higher,

21:10

but making a diagonals widths

21:13

uh closer actually pulls up the diagonal

21:15

point. So, something to play with an

21:17

option strat. It's It's quite easy just

21:19

to slide the sliders and and see what

21:21

happens, move prices around. So, So,

21:23

this is basically an artistic approach

21:25

to opening a trade where you kind of

21:27

play back and forth and until you find

21:30

what I've been asked by so many people,

21:31

can I automate this trade? Could Could I

21:33

make a, you know, a formula like enter

21:36

sell the 20 delta, whatever, buy the 30

21:38

delta, whatever it is. And it's like,

21:40

well, I've never considered it because

21:42

every week volatility is different, the

21:44

market conditions are different every

21:46

week.

21:47

And people who who follow my trades will

21:49

will see that the the the the the

21:52

diagonals are actually pretty

21:53

consistent,

21:54

but the broken wing butterfly widths are

21:56

different almost every week

21:58

depending on what's happening in the

21:59

market just just to get the curve right.

22:02

Um

22:02

So, I quite like this approach. I want

22:03

the trade to look look good. It's It

22:06

seems so simple, but um

22:09

yeah, that's how I do it. So, Simon, you

22:11

have the beautiful curve you can admire

22:14

and you are free to open the trade, but

22:17

what then?

22:19

When do you take it off? What are your

22:21

rules? So, I like to use buying power as

22:25

my metric. So, if a trade has a buying

22:29

power, and for these trades the buying

22:30

power and the max loss are very similar.

22:34

Um so, in option strat you can actually

22:36

can show you in this trade I'm in. If I

22:37

slide the range slider to the extreme,

22:40

you know, how much could I lose in this

22:42

trade? You know, you're getting down

22:44

here. I mean, you can go all the way to

22:45

the bottom, but let's say the market

22:47

dropped, I don't know, 10%, which is

22:49

probably unlikely, but let's say it

22:51

does,

22:51

about $1,300 or whatever. So, let's say

22:54

the max loss or Well, it's not the max

22:56

loss, but let's say the buying power is

22:57

about that. So, I would say buying power

23:00

is about

23:01

$1,300. I would be [snorts] keen for 10%

23:04

profit. So, if this trade shows

23:07

10% of a $1,300, which is $130,

23:11

I would get out. I'm happy

23:13

um with that 10%. If

23:16

you know, the trade is going through the

23:17

week and you're

23:18

still price is still right in the center

23:20

of the curve, you can try and, you know,

23:23

hit more of a home run and get a higher

23:25

return. I've had over 20% returns

23:28

in the past number of times. I've had as

23:30

high as 40%, but that was usually due to

23:32

a big volatility spike. But, um

23:35

it somewhere between 10 and 20% is

23:37

definitely where I'd like to get out.

23:38

I've been in situations before where

23:40

it's been hovering just below 10%

23:42

getting near the market close for the

23:43

day.

23:44

And I'm like

23:45

it's it's the almost the most

23:47

interesting time. It's like, should I

23:48

just take 8% and run? Or should I wait

23:51

and see? And sometimes you wake up the

23:54

next day and it's back down to 3% or you

23:57

wake up and it's 15%. So, it's a bit of

23:58

a lottery. So, I

24:01

you asked me how this trade has changed

24:03

over time and I think one thing I've

24:05

done more of and this year especially is

24:08

if it's close enough for a profit, I

24:11

will take the money and run. And to be

24:12

in some part to be fair, it's

24:14

the market at the moment is crazy with

24:15

this Iran conflict, oil dramas. And so,

24:19

you know, the market who knows what's

24:20

going to happen. So, at the moment I'm

24:21

being being quite conservative. I think

24:23

in a more

24:25

sort of quote-unquote normal market, you

24:27

might be able to hold these trades a bit

24:28

longer if the market's not moving much.

24:30

So, that's what I like to do

24:32

in terms of getting out. And I think

24:33

that's also my experience from trading

24:36

this that you it's very smart to take

24:38

the profit when you have it because it

24:40

can

24:41

it can change quite quickly, especially

24:43

as you

24:44

>> [clears throat]

24:45

>> get nearer to the nearer to the

24:48

expiration. And what looks like a very

24:50

positive trade one day can have changed

24:52

completely. Uh

24:53

in fact, my biggest loss in it in April

24:57

where I had two contracts on and they

24:59

reached 10% and I was

25:02

took only one off and the other I left

25:04

for the next day hoping for more and

25:06

that ended up as one of my biggest

25:09

losers. So, take your profit I think is

25:11

a good advice here. It's it's always

25:13

good advice and one thing I always say

25:16

to to people who are in my discord and

25:18

and follow my trades is there's actually

25:20

nothing wrong with taking a loss.

25:22

Sometimes you'll wake up and markets

25:23

dropped a couple of percent and it might

25:25

be showing a small loss.

25:27

And people are like, "Oh, what should I

25:28

do? Should I adjust?

25:30

Should I just hope? Should I get out?"

25:32

And to me, taking a 1 or 2% loss is

25:35

like, "No,

25:36

you know, who cares?" Like that's

25:38

that's the least of your worries taking

25:40

a small loss. So,

25:41

I I want to get out for 10%. I will

25:44

definitely get out if if the if the

25:45

whole trade is down 30 40% like a big

25:49

big move, something has gone crazy.

25:51

I'll just get out. There's There's no

25:53

point trying to risk your trade which is

25:55

beyond hope price. Sometimes, you know,

25:58

people always

26:00

try to they try to save every trade. I'm

26:03

in a delta neutral trade. I don't want

26:04

the market to move. If the market moves

26:06

a lot,

26:07

okay,

26:08

this is not the trade for me. I was

26:09

wrong. You know, I I can't you can't

26:12

sort of you can't have it both ways.

26:13

Either you're trying to be delta neutral

26:15

or you're trying to pick a direction. If

26:16

I'm in a delta neutral trade and the

26:18

market absolutely just

26:20

bombs or for some reason flies up, I'm

26:22

happy to take a loss. I think taking a

26:24

loss is just part of trading. I'm not

26:26

afraid of that at all.

26:27

I know you also have a deadline for when

26:30

you

26:30

have want to be out of the trade no

26:32

matter what.

26:34

Yep, it's and to me it's very important

26:36

rule and if you if you bring up options

26:39

spread again, I can can show you why

26:40

that is. This trade here this is options

26:43

spread again like I mentioned, it's just

26:44

theoretical and it it's just a guess of

26:47

what's going to happen, but this trade

26:49

here is showing what things could look

26:50

like with

26:51

uh

26:52

1.7 days to go. You know, so you're on

26:56

you're on Wednesday morning. It's like,

26:58

"Yeah, we're going to

26:59

go to war whatever it is

27:01

Thursday morning, sorry." You got to the

27:03

end of Friday. But, if you

27:05

if your price was somewhere up around

27:06

here, say,

27:08

this is great. I'm going to you're going

27:09

to make you're going to make lots of

27:10

money. As you slide this forward, so I

27:13

like to be out

27:15

24 hours to go. I like to quote be out

27:17

by the Thursday. I don't want to hold it

27:18

on the Friday. So, on the third on the

27:21

end of trading on Thursday, you're sort

27:22

of sitting somewhere around here, 24

27:24

hours to go. Still looks pretty good,

27:26

but the moment you start getting to that

27:28

last day, that curve really starts to

27:31

whip around. Now, if you're over here,

27:34

if you're up on the diagonal, fantastic.

27:36

But, if you're But, because the market

27:38

can move a percentage a day easily, next

27:41

minute you're here and you've gone

27:43

you've your loss has been given away.

27:45

And what's worse is if not only if you

27:47

were here and the market flies up and

27:48

the volatility drops,

27:50

not only that, your

27:52

your curve can pull along by the line.

27:54

So, what was going to be a nice

27:57

profit or at least a profit the day

27:59

before, you hold into the last day with

28:01

a volatility drop, and next minute it's

28:03

a

28:04

it's a small loss, right? So,

28:07

that's why taking the money when it's

28:08

there is quite important because

28:10

holding to that especially holding into

28:11

the last day is a bit fraught.

28:13

Personally, I often let the trade be

28:16

open in options start after I have

28:18

closed it. So, I see where it would have

28:20

developed. And of course, there are some

28:23

weeks where it would have been fantastic

28:25

profitable in the middle of those 10

28:27

$2,000 or whatever, but there are just

28:29

as often weeks when it would have ended

28:32

up with minus 1,500 minus 2,000. So,

28:35

that last day is really volatile. Stay

28:39

out of it. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, what

28:41

they say is hindsight's 20/20. So, yeah,

28:44

exactly that. So,

28:46

I learned a long time ago not to try to

28:47

hold it until the last day.

28:49

And you know, like you can look at it

28:52

and go, "Oh, if I just held for

28:53

tomorrow, what what is actually showing

28:55

as a loss might be a profit." So, I will

28:57

get out

28:58

at the last bit of middle on Thursday

29:00

for a loss. I don't want to even try to

29:02

do it on you know, Thursday so on

29:04

Friday. So, yeah.

29:05

But Simon, this trade doesn't always

29:07

work out, right? So, what are the most

29:09

typical situation when things go wrong

29:12

and you need to decide what to do? Um

29:15

well, like I mentioned, it's a delta

29:16

neutral trade, right? So, the the

29:18

the main thing well, pretty much the

29:19

only thing that can go wrong well, not

29:21

the only thing, but the main thing that

29:22

can go wrong, of course, is a big market

29:24

move, either up or down, right? Because

29:26

we're trying to be in the middle of that

29:27

curve. If we move down a lot,

29:30

you know, or up a lot, we start to get

29:32

beyond what the break evens could be.

29:34

The other thing, which is not doesn't

29:36

happen as common well, it's not as

29:37

often, I should say, is that there's

29:39

some big vol crash. For some reason,

29:41

volatility is artificially high. Maybe

29:43

there's been some big news, and then

29:45

that volatility

29:46

uh dumps. And we we have seen it this

29:49

year with um

29:51

volatility's up because of the oil

29:52

crisis in Iran, and then next minute,

29:54

there's a ceasefire and the vol drops,

29:56

and then there's not a ceasefire and it

29:58

goes up. So,

29:59

the biggest things are big market moves

30:02

or a vol crash. Um in those situation,

30:05

obviously, one choice is to close the

30:08

trade. But if you want to save it or

30:11

manage it, could we look at a couple

30:13

situations that could happen and what uh

30:15

what you could consider doing in those

30:18

situations? Again, this is a real trade

30:20

I'm in. I like to keep the slider around

30:23

this whole about a day to go cuz it sort

30:25

of shows me where the trade is going.

30:26

So, if you imagine we're in this trade

30:29

right now, obviously, it looks great at

30:31

the moment where we're going to end up.

30:32

But let's say we woke up tomorrow and

30:34

the market had dumped down

30:36

some percentage, and we you know, we we

30:39

get down here somewhere. If we were down

30:40

here, there's only a half a percent gap,

30:43

right, to break even. We're at the point

30:45

now where it's like

30:46

if the market dropped, you know, say it

30:49

dropped down 2 and 1/2% overnight, and

30:51

then it dropped down another 2% the next

30:52

day, we would be in this territory here.

30:55

Now, like I said, I keep banging on, I

30:57

say it often and often all over again,

30:59

taking the losses fine, but if you like

31:01

you said, if you decide I really want to

31:03

try and rescue this trade or make it

31:05

last or whatever, maybe it's early in

31:07

the trade and you think it's going to

31:08

bounce back, whatever reason.

31:10

The downside adjustment, my go-to and is

31:12

this is where you use your sort of um

31:14

your sort of trader's toolkit. You've

31:16

You've got a few skills and you know

31:17

some trades. I like uh calendars for my

31:21

downside adjustment. Calendars are

31:22

really simple. I I use I keep it really

31:25

simple. It's the same dates as um

31:28

as the diagonal. So, let's say the

31:29

market's coming down, I might decide to

31:31

try and

31:33

you know, put a diagonal on. So, I'm

31:35

just going to throw one on and then I'll

31:36

throw a calendar on and then I'm just

31:37

going to have a play. So, I'm just going

31:39

to sell put and buy a put.

31:43

And I'm going to change the expiration

31:45

to match the other one.

31:48

And instantly you get this big

31:51

curve, right? And so, this is giving you

31:53

this

31:54

big you know, move to the downside.

31:57

Yeah, and so, you know, you've got even

31:59

a bigger break even. And of course, if

32:01

the market did keep dropping down,

32:02

volatility might keep spiking up and

32:04

that gives you even more room. So,

32:06

to be honest, I'm not afraid of of

32:10

downside moves. Obviously, I'm afraid of

32:11

a 10% crash, of course, no one can

32:13

survive that, but for that sort of

32:16

3% shock, I might better recover. But,

32:19

this looks great on paper, but the the

32:21

issue with this is this trade, I don't

32:23

know if you noticed earlier, this trade

32:24

cost

32:25

I think it was two nearly $270,

32:28

something. The point is now the whole

32:29

trade costs more, and I don't actually

32:31

care about the cost in general, but

32:33

because the trade costs more,

32:35

if the market then recovered, right?

32:38

You and let's say it bounced back up.

32:41

You could be like, well, this I don't

32:42

need this calendar anymore. I can sell

32:43

it. So, you'd sell that calendar at a

32:45

loss, which is fine.

32:47

But basically now, what that would mean

32:49

is this this lower point here

32:52

will be quite low now. You've spent more

32:54

money, right? So, where this curve was

32:56

higher up, now it's lower down. So, that

33:00

that's the disadvantage of these

33:01

downside adjustments is if if you

33:04

turns out you didn't need it and the

33:05

market rebounded,

33:07

the chance of getting the profit now is

33:08

low. And if we talk about my trading

33:10

results later, if I I can show you some

33:12

examples, you'll actually see that

33:14

almost all my adjustments don't lead to

33:17

some big win. They just lead to a

33:20

minimized loss or maybe a small profit.

33:23

So, for me, when I'm adjusting, I'm

33:25

like,

33:26

it's defense mode. I'm not I'm like,

33:28

okay, I'm in a delta neutral trade.

33:30

It's not going my way. What can I do to

33:32

try and get out of this with the least

33:34

damage? So, that's where I think of

33:35

adjustments there. You're better to try

33:37

and rescue um

33:39

that trade if if possible.

33:42

You said that you are not so afraid for

33:45

the downwards moves,

33:47

I guess because you get some extra help

33:49

by the increased volatility that

33:52

typically follows that move. But when

33:55

[laughter] the market jumps up, like we

33:57

had in April, we had like

34:00

market recovery that was pretty

34:02

marvelous and it moved very very quickly

34:06

to the to the upside. How do What do you

34:09

do then?

34:10

Yeah, well, so

34:12

what I've been doing recently, this is

34:14

not even an adjustment, but when you

34:17

set up this trade and play with the

34:19

widths and stuff, I'm just going to move

34:20

this range about higher.

34:22

Again, I don't know if you can s- I

34:25

mean, you should be able to see this,

34:26

but you'll see here the loss to the

34:27

downside, we talked about that before,

34:29

1,300 or 1,400. Notice that the upside

34:32

is actually deliberately not as much.

34:35

So, I've skewed this trade to have less

34:37

risk

34:38

to the upside. And you can actually skew

34:40

it to have less risk to the downside.

34:42

So, you can you can actually play with

34:43

it at the market at the moment. I'm a

34:45

bit afraid of a big upside move. So,

34:48

I've made it that even if there was some

34:50

crazy move up,

34:51

the damage will be less. But back to

34:53

your question about actual adjustments.

34:55

Now,

34:56

it's almost counterintuitive, but quite

34:57

often what happens is

34:59

when the market starts falling up,

35:02

um volatility has probably naturally

35:05

dropped down a bit. Things have kind of

35:07

back to normal. And one simple thing I

35:10

do, and it is counterintuitive, I like

35:13

to use just

35:14

a a

35:15

you know, a call calendar or a sort of a

35:18

diagonal above the market. It gives it a

35:20

bit of a target to hit, and I know that

35:22

a volatility contraction doesn't play

35:25

well with call calendars.

35:27

But my reasoning is that volatility is

35:29

already dropped quite a lot. That's why

35:30

we're already on the way up. And so, is

35:32

it going to keep dropping more? I don't

35:34

know. So, just give an example. To be

35:36

fair, I I I'm more prone to like just

35:38

take a small loss for a big upside move,

35:40

but if I wanted to try and rescue it,

35:42

I'm just going to throw a random um

35:43

calendar on here. I'm not even going to

35:45

sort of look

35:46

uh exactly where I'm putting it, but

35:48

just to sort of show you what this can

35:49

do.

35:50

It's going to change the expiration.

35:54

So, it gives a bit of a bump here,

35:56

right? And so, again, it's got a bit

35:58

more room. But what you can do is you

36:00

can start playing with this and move it

36:03

along a bit. And if you actually

36:05

um people Some people aren't really

36:07

familiar with the diagonal. We are the

36:08

long that's closer, but if you move the

36:10

long a little bit closer to the market,

36:12

it even goes even further.

36:14

All right? So, you sort of get to this

36:16

point where it's going further. Now,

36:19

like I said about volatility, the

36:20

downside of this is if there really is

36:22

if there was a lot of juice in the

36:23

market and if there's still a a of

36:25

volatility to come out, if I start

36:27

pulling this down, you'll watch that

36:28

break even come closer and closer and

36:29

closer and closer and closer.

36:31

Right? So, you're trying to protect, you

36:34

know, and it's it's still only, you

36:36

know, maybe it's fine, maybe it's not,

36:38

but I if you want to try and adjust to

36:41

the upside, I just try to give it a

36:43

little target because calendars make the

36:45

most money if you

36:47

you pin it right. If you if the you end

36:48

up close near expiration on that, you

36:51

know,

36:52

that that that price. Um of course, like

36:54

I said, I don't hold to expiration, but

36:56

the curve sort of pulls up. But then

36:58

again, there's that downside is that uh

37:00

going back now I've spent more money,

37:03

so

37:04

if vol did drop and then it it it would

37:07

sort of maybe there's a big vol crush

37:09

and that's sort of now this is the

37:10

normal vol amount, right? And then the

37:12

market starts coming down again.

37:14

Maybe we pull and we get further and

37:16

closer I don't know. We we we get Yeah,

37:18

you can sort of see the moment you see

37:19

this line below

37:21

zero, there's always a chance of taking

37:23

a loss, right? So,

37:24

if I if I keep dumping vol down,

37:27

uh

37:28

you know, this is more negative now. And

37:29

the reason why this is more negative is

37:31

I've spent more on the trade

37:33

because I paid for a calendar. So, with

37:35

every adjustment, there's the trade-off.

37:37

It's 100% possible to do adjustments,

37:39

but it's sort of a

37:41

I wouldn't say it's a a beginner sort of

37:43

trade. Luckily, I'm using mainly

37:46

calendars and diagonals to adjust and I

37:48

think

37:49

because that's the basis of the trade

37:51

and I understand that really well, I'm

37:52

pretty comfortable, but Does it matter

37:54

when you make the adjustments? Yeah,

37:57

yes, that's a good point, actually. So,

37:59

if I like I mentioned, I like to get

38:01

into all my trades sort of I get in 1

38:03

week for the next week's expiry.

38:06

If there's something happens on the day

38:08

after I get into the trade, I get on on

38:10

a Thursday, there's something on a

38:11

Friday or on the Monday,

38:13

I might consider adjusting.

38:15

Getting closer to the end of you know,

38:18

the expiration week, you get to the

38:20

point where your adjustments aren't

38:21

going to do anything for you, you know,

38:23

because it's just

38:24

you've

38:26

you're trying to counter that that early

38:28

move in the trade. If If you get some

38:30

big late move,

38:32

it's almost like the ship has sailed at

38:33

that point, so it's easier probably just

38:34

to take a small loss.

38:36

Adjustments are possible later, but

38:39

that's that's getting into sort of

38:40

almost expert territory. And to be

38:43

honest, I'd rather just be like, "Look,

38:45

I'll take a 5% loss

38:47

than to try and adjust it and turn it

38:49

into a 20 20% loss or whatever." So,

38:51

that's just me.

38:53

Approximately how many of your trades

38:55

have you ended up adjusting?

38:58

I actually was looking at that earlier.

38:59

This

39:01

I can show you my results page if you

39:03

want to I can count them exactly, but

39:04

I'm pretty sure um

39:07

I think last year it was about 20%, but

39:10

this year it's closer to 15%, so it's

39:13

not a lot. Uh Simon, what has been the

39:16

worst loss you had? Really early when I

39:19

started, I this is like 2024, I had a a

39:22

40% loss and it was actually when Trump

39:25

got reelected, the markets went crazy.

39:27

Uh ever since then, I um

39:31

the probably the biggest trade I loss

39:33

I've had on average, I've had a couple

39:34

of 20% losses. So, that's 20% on buying

39:36

power. As you know, I'm aiming for that

39:38

10%, so at the moment a loss might wipe

39:42

out two weeks of gains. Uh what what is

39:45

the worst that can happen with this

39:47

strategy? The worst that can happen is

39:48

there's some big,

39:50

you know, market

39:53

crash, obviously, like any anything. And

39:55

of course, I'm trying to be delta

39:56

neutral, so some big crash could result

39:58

in a near

39:59

um full loss. But the best thing about

40:02

these trades is they are defined risk.

40:04

The moment you enter this trade, you

40:06

know the most you can lose, so

40:09

you can take that into account. That's

40:10

just standard trading risk management,

40:12

you know, don't overtrade, don't trade

40:14

more contracts than you should if you

40:15

can't afford,

40:17

you know, like that that trade I was

40:18

showing you was a single contract trade.

40:20

I can lose it that I lost it $1,300.

40:23

Fine. If that's a If that's a black swan

40:26

event, 10% crash, and all I lose is

40:28

$1,300,

40:29

that's okay. So, that's why I'm sort of

40:32

I think it's quite a good trade because

40:35

yes, you will take losses, but a lot of

40:37

people get worried about that big crash.

40:40

Um and you will just lose

40:42

you know, these are weekly trades. So,

40:44

if a crash is you'll lose that trade.

40:46

And then maybe vol's gone crazy and

40:48

you'll put a trade on and it

40:50

wins, I don't know. So, yeah. I always

40:52

ask my guests to put their strategy on

40:55

the risk profile scale from one being

40:57

very low risk and 10 being very high

40:59

risk. And where would you put it this

41:01

year and has it changed from what what

41:04

you said last year?

41:05

Yeah, to be honest, I can't remember

41:07

what I said last year. I probably said

41:08

about a four or five. I think it's

41:10

probably still there. I mean,

41:14

it's the fine risk, right? So, in terms

41:16

of risk levels, I'm not selling naked

41:19

strangles or anything like that. So, I'm

41:21

not going to wake up $40,000 underwater

41:24

if there's a big vol spike. Um so, that

41:26

makes it low risk. It but I think the

41:28

risk might come from just general

41:30

management of it or even getting into it

41:33

because, you know, diagonals and broken

41:35

wing butterflies, they're not beginner

41:36

strategies. So, I would say it's

41:38

probably a four

41:40

around a four or five for risk just

41:42

because if you don't really know what

41:44

you're doing, it could be more risky. If

41:46

you're an expert trader or

41:47

intermediate trader who's really

41:48

familiar with the diagonals and

41:50

butterflies, then it's pretty low risk.

41:52

One of the reasons I wanted to invite

41:54

you back is that you have traded this

41:56

strategy now for three years. You

41:59

publish your results every single week.

42:03

So, you have a pretty, you know, solid

42:06

results to show. So, let's get into your

42:09

actual results of trading this strategy

42:12

through three years. Yeah, my results

42:15

been pretty good. I'll show you my 2026

42:17

results. They're on my website. Like you

42:20

mentioned, I trade every week, rain or

42:22

shine. I don't skip a week unless I'm

42:24

I'm out of out of the country or on

42:25

holiday. So, I've had 19 trades this

42:28

year so far, 16 winners. So, that's the

42:30

percentage. These are

42:32

These results I'm showing are per

42:34

contract. I personally trade more than

42:36

one contract, but for the sake of

42:37

transparency, I I show my results as one

42:40

contract. That way you can

42:42

factor in how you trade. So, clearly you

42:44

can see

42:45

and ironically, John, I think when you

42:47

interviewed me a year ago, you said I

42:48

was up 40% after 4 months. And again,

42:51

I'm up about 40% after 4 months. So,

42:53

it's pretty consistent. And this this

42:54

return annualized is just me sort of

42:56

calculating it. But you also last year I

42:58

ended up I just snuck over 100% return

43:01

last year. I actually

43:03

I actually took a trade, I think, on um

43:05

actually on Christmas It was Christmas

43:07

Day my time. Just I took a holiday trade

43:10

to try and get it over 100%. If it lost,

43:12

it would have got further, but I I

43:13

actually I actually added a note to my

43:15

trade at the bottom here. I actually

43:17

exited on deliberately for $11.60

43:20

profit. I literally took a holiday trade

43:23

just to get it. The moment I got I

43:24

actually I got my calculator out, worked

43:26

out commissions and fees, and worked it

43:28

out if I hit this, get out, it would be

43:30

100%. So,

43:32

that's why it's exactly 100% Well, not

43:34

exactly 100 103.

43:37

So, that's the full full year result.

43:39

But yeah, so it's it's you know, it's

43:41

100% 200% a year is obviously So, it's

43:43

been consistently profitable for all

43:45

those three years. And if you move back

43:47

to 2026,

43:49

I know that you are analyzing what the

43:52

results would be. Yeah, I mean, this is

43:54

just a You can sort of see up here the

43:56

calculation because it's it's 45.4% in

44:00

134 days, and that works out to be like

44:02

if you times it out, you know, this is

44:04

my math geek engineering thing going on

44:06

here. So, this is where if things stay

44:08

the how they are, this is where you

44:10

could end up, of course.

44:11

But that's Simon, and that because

44:13

I have had many interview guests here,

44:15

and one one thing I've found is that

44:17

people measure their results in very

44:19

different ways. But the most common is

44:21

probably to measure by the as a

44:23

percentage of the buying power or the

44:25

max loss use

44:27

used. But you actually do it a bit

44:29

different and I would say conservative

44:32

or generous way because what you do is

44:35

you have allocated a

44:37

set of money for your trades, but you

44:39

use less than half of that buying power.

44:41

So, so so your results is

44:45

your results

44:46

as a percentage of the allocated

44:47

capital. So, if you had measured your

44:49

result in the same way as most of my

44:51

guests,

44:52

it would have looked much much better.

44:55

>> Probably twice or 300%. Yeah. Well, what

44:57

my my

44:59

as you probably

45:00

gleaned by talking to me now, I'm pretty

45:02

conservative, and my idea is this. Like

45:05

you've seen me put on these trades, max

45:07

loss per contract of $1,000, say. So,

45:10

let's say I take a max loss, right?

45:12

Well, if if that's my whole trading

45:14

account wiped out,

45:16

that's no good. So, my idea is I

45:18

allocate $3,000 per contract, right? So,

45:21

if I had

45:23

you know, I don't know, $12,000 to throw

45:25

at this strategy, I might trade four

45:27

contracts. I could take a full loss.

45:29

Yes, it would wipe

45:31

out some money.

45:32

I guess in that situation it would be

45:33

down to whatever,

45:35

uh you know,

45:36

take take away 12, you know, 8,000. But

45:38

then I could still probably trade nearly

45:40

two or three. The point is I didn't want

45:42

a lot of full loss on this trade to wipe

45:44

it out. So,

45:45

this percentage is based on 3,000. I

45:48

don't risk $3,000 per trade. I cannot

45:50

lose $3,000 per trade per contract. It's

45:52

it's impossible by how I place them. So,

45:56

as as ironic as it sounds, this 100%

45:58

return is the conservative result. It's

46:01

I feel really bad cuz people see these

46:02

results and they're like, "This is This

46:03

can't be real." It's like

46:05

I can show you my trading statements.

46:07

They're available Some trading

46:08

statements are actually available on my

46:09

website because people keep asking for

46:10

them. It's like, "These are These are

46:12

real trades." And anyone who's in my

46:13

discourse sees me place these trades

46:15

every week and again can confirm that

46:18

the numbers these

46:19

uh

46:20

these numbers and these debits and entry

46:22

dates and exit dates are all are all

46:24

accurate. And as you know, John, of

46:25

course you are in that discourse, so you

46:27

you discourse you do see these uh these

46:29

trades yourself.

46:30

Yep. So, yeah, so those are those are my

46:32

results. But John, I know that you also

46:34

trade this. So, how have you been going?

46:37

Well, this has been a very solid

46:39

strategy for me.

46:41

I measure my results as the results of

46:44

compared to the buying power or the max

46:47

loss, which is most common way. Although

46:50

I fully agree with your

46:52

your way of thinking that you want to

46:55

never

46:56

risk more than half of your buying power

46:58

anyway on on on your trading. But I have

47:01

done 57 trades so far

47:05

over the last year and a year. And

47:09

46 of them have been winners. On

47:13

average, my average net profit per trade

47:15

has been 5.33%.

47:19

It was a bit higher, but I did take a

47:20

couple of big losses in April. And I'm

47:24

have on average been 5.7

47:26

days in the trade. So, for me getting

47:29

more than 5% on a trade that is on

47:31

average lasting less than six days,

47:33

that's

47:34

something I'm very happy with for sure.

47:38

It's great to hear.

47:40

So, let's sum up Sam. How would you sum

47:43

up this strategy in a few words?

47:47

Uh I would say it's a strategy

47:49

not for beginners, but intermediate to

47:52

advanced traders who want to have a

47:54

weekly trade that's Delta neutral. So,

47:56

you you don't know which way the

47:57

market's going, you want to try and

47:59

capture that theta decay and hopefully

48:01

handle some

48:02

uh

48:03

you know, volatility moves, and a trade

48:06

that you don't have to look at

48:09

you know,

48:09

all day and be glued to your screen. Um

48:11

I've mentioned in the past um

48:14

I'm asleep for half the market, so

48:16

>> [laughter]

48:16

>> I can't watch it. So, yeah. I think many

48:18

have also watched on this channel an

48:21

interview with Steve Gunn's about his

48:24

fly diagonal strategy. That is

48:26

quite similar

48:28

trading strategy. What would you say are

48:30

the difference between how you trade and

48:32

how Steve is trading this? To be 100%

48:35

honest, I've never like I've I've not

48:37

done Steve's course. I I don't actually

48:39

know his exact mechanics other than what

48:41

I've seen on your video. From what I can

48:43

glean looking at some of his you know,

48:46

option strat or not he doesn't use

48:47

option strat, he uses that other tool,

48:49

but

48:49

>> [laughter]

48:50

>> his graphs, it seems to me and this is

48:53

just my um

48:55

guess. I think he's a little bit tighter

48:57

in on the range, and so which can give a

49:00

nice a bigger sort of bump up in the

49:02

curve in the middle, but I think that

49:04

might lead to more adjustment. So,

49:06

without knowing the full details of of

49:08

his trade, I would say he probably has

49:10

to adjust it more than I do.

49:12

Um but the mechanics are the same

49:14

concept, and we we came up with these

49:16

trades independently. What would be the

49:17

two or three most important takeaways

49:20

you really want the audience to remember

49:22

from this interview? I would say that

49:24

getting the good curve is the secret.

49:27

Uh I would say getting out

49:30

with uh

49:31

no more than 24 hours to go is very

49:33

important, and I would say like we just

49:37

just talked about um allocate your

49:39

capital wisely. Don't throw all your

49:41

money at a single strategy. Good advice,

49:44

that.

49:45

What would be good resources to learn

49:47

more?

49:48

Uh well, I've as Well, as showing you, I

49:50

have my website. If you want to see all

49:52

the trading logs and graphs and um

49:55

or you want to

49:56

find my email address and contact me,

49:58

uh you can do so

49:59

through that. It's probably the easiest

50:01

way to get a hold of me. And what would

50:02

be a couple of good books to recommend

50:05

to Well, I was prepared I was prepared

50:07

for this, John. So, last time I was on,

50:09

I mentioned Julia's book, um

50:12

which is the Tastytrade one, The Unlucky

50:14

Investor's Guide to Options Trading. Uh

50:16

it's still a great book. It's very

50:18

mathematical, but I think it's a cool

50:19

book. I I bought two more here because

50:21

one of the things that a lot of traders

50:24

struggle with is mindset and discipline.

50:28

And you know, just putting random trades

50:29

on. And so, there's a book by um Mark

50:32

Douglas called uh Trading in the Zone.

50:35

Uh it's a really good book about mindset

50:37

and just

50:38

uh sorry, it's a bit blurry, but Trading

50:40

in the Zone and it's if you're having

50:42

trouble with discipline, I recommend

50:43

that. And a book which is kind of almost

50:46

counterintuitive to to Tastytrade

50:48

mechanics and things like the standard

50:49

deviation and the expected move, there's

50:52

a great book called Fooled by

50:54

Randomness.

50:55

And uh the little tagline is The Hidden

50:58

Role of Chance in Life and in the

51:00

markets. And it's um

51:02

it's fascinating. It sort of explains

51:04

why how

51:06

we get all these six

51:08

six or seven standard deviation moves

51:10

more regularly than we think because the

51:12

market actually is

51:14

well, random. And so, Fooled by

51:16

Randomness is basically uh talking about

51:18

how you don't you can never know what's

51:20

happening. So, it's a very interesting

51:21

read. I it's uh it's not purely a

51:23

trading book, but it's if you're a

51:24

trader, I think you'll find it really

51:26

interesting. Thank you very much, Simon,

51:28

for uh coming back here on Theta Profits

51:30

to uh share your time flies strategy and

51:33

how you uh trade it and how you uh

51:36

adjust it and your pretty amazing

51:39

results, I would say, over our three

51:42

years. We do have a number of other

51:44

interviews that might be relevant. I

51:46

will

51:47

uh show a couple of them on the on the

51:49

screen here. Thank you very much again,

51:52

Simon.

51:53

Thank [snorts] you very much, John. It's

51:54

been an honor to be your first return

51:56

strategist.

51:58

All the and all the best trading with

51:59

Tom fights for yourself.

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.