Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

SpaceX IPO: Get Rich or Get Wrecked

57:27829 summary words · ~4 min readEnglishBy Dumb Money LiveTranscribed Jun 12, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The SpaceX IPO (SPCX) is structured with a historically small 4% float and a massive 30% retail allocation to engineer an artificial floor via forced passive index buying, while masking a physical transition of XAI into a raw data center infrastructure player.

This video provides valuable insights for macro investors looking to dissect modern IPO liquidity mechanics, trace the capital expenditure flows of the frontier AI hardware layer, and evaluate geopolitical maritime bottlenecks.

Section summaries

0:00-3:34

Structural Mechanics of the SPCX IPO

watch

The hosts break down the unprecedented scale of the SpaceX IPO, specifically focusing on the 30% retail allocation ($25 billion), the incredibly tight initial float of 4%, and the resulting mechanical tailwinds created by forced passive index buying.

Essential for understanding how market structure and passive flows will artificially prop up the stock's listing.

3:34-7:17

Reflecting on Early SpaceX Investments

optional

Chris and Jordan discuss their personal investment history in SpaceX from 2020 at a $30 billion valuation, comparing the past landscape of private secondary markets to the current retail-targeted IPO pricing of 100x trailing sales.

Interesting background context on private valuations, but less actionable for immediate public trading.

7:17-12:58

Narrative Valuations & XAI's Physical Pivot

watch

The team analyzes how narrative-driven valuations function in space economics where claims are too long-horizon to disprove. They detail how XAI failed to compete with OpenAI/Anthropic in software and has pivoted into a pure data center infrastructure play.

Highlights the reality of the AI scaling bottleneck shifting from software modeling to physical hardware.

12:58-16:56

Modern Retail Market Psychology

skip

A discussion on retail investor behavior, ticker symbol fat-fingering (buying incorrect, similar-sounding tickers), and how modern trading has evolved into a lifestyle choice or community identity rather than fundamental analysis.

Lighthearted banter about retail trading errors and market culture with low technical density.

16:56-20:44

The Wave of Frontier AI IPOs

watch

Analyzing the broader macroeconomic shift as OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX all move toward concurrent public offerings to secure massive capital buffers, signaling a transition from venture backing to public market liquidity.

Provides a comprehensive overview of the late-stage venture liquidity cycle for frontier AI labs.

20:44-24:43

Downstream Hardware & Proxy Trades

watch

The hosts identify Intel, SMCI, and NVIDIA as the primary beneficiaries of the $75 billion capital influx from the SPCX IPO. They explore Intel's fabrication partnerships, SMCI's liquid cooling dominance, and the structural tailwinds for the hardware layer.

Contains highly specific, actionable trade ideas targeting upstream infrastructure suppliers.

24:43-31:41

Financial Governance & Regulatory Decay

optional

Jordan and Chris discuss corporate self-governance, the lack of systemic accountability in modern markets, and historical regulatory failures ranging from the 2008 crash to Trevor Milton's Nikola Motors scandal.

An insightful macro-philosophical debate on political economy, but lacks direct trading plays.

31:41-35:31

Amazon Capex and Debt Issuance Strategy

watch

The hosts analyze Amazon's urgent need to raise $60B to $120B in debt to fund AI capex to keep pace with Google and Meta. They explain why a short-term drop in Amazon shares upon issuance is a high-probability buying opportunity.

Provides a highly specific, timeline-driven playbook for trading mega-cap tech capex cycles.

35:31-41:50

Robin Hood and Sweet Green Momentum Plays

optional

Analyzing Robin Hood's correlation to current crypto market weakness and reviewing Chris's short-term options trades on Sweet Green (SG). Jordan argues against applying software multiples to fast-casual restaurant chains.

Primarily focused on short-term restaurant option dynamics and crypto retail volume.

41:50-46:09

SPCX Action Playbook & GTA Catalyst Timelines

watch

Details how to manage an actual SPCX IPO allocation and introduces an upcoming systematic trade for Take-Two Interactive ahead of the Grand Theft Auto release, emphasizing that the trade must be placed by July before the fall run-up.

Provides specific entry windows for both the SpaceX listing and the GTA consumer cycle.

Key points

  • Forced Index Buying & Tight Float Dynamics — With only a 4% initial float, the SpaceX IPO is engineered to force passive indices to aggressively purchase shares on the open market, establishing an artificial tailwind and price floor despite an initial valuation of 100x trailing sales.
  • XAI's Pivot to Physical Data Center Infrastructure — Having failed to capture consumer or enterprise API market share against OpenAI and Anthropic, XAI is pivoting into a brute-force data center hosting business ('TerraFab'), utilizing SpaceX's unique capital-raising velocity and physical footprint.
  • Hardware Proxies Over Overpriced IPO Shares — Instead of chasing overvalued retail SPCX allocations, sophisticated capital is flowing upstream into partners like Intel (acting as a call option on SpaceX's fabrication needs) and SMCI (supplying liquid-cooled server racks for TerraFab).
  • Strait of Hormuz Asymmetric Geopolitical Leverage — The maritime bottleneck in the Strait of Hormuz will not resolve quickly because Iran possesses asymmetric leverage to keep it closed to extract financial concessions, while the U.S. faces strict, election-cycle timelines to end the disruption.
SpaceX is doing something that no other company has ever done with an IPO of this size. They're going after retail investors. Dumb money. Dave
XAI was supposed to be a massive leading frontier lab, right? ... The truth is, I've been saying this for two and a half years ... They never had a chance. Chris

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:00

[music]

0:03

SpaceX is doing something that no other

0:05

company has ever done with an IPO of

0:07

this size. They're going after retail

0:09

investors. Dumb money. Not with the uh

0:12

usual 5 or 10% allocation, but with 30%

0:14

on the largest IPO in history. That is

0:17

roughly $25 billion sold directly to

0:19

everyday investors like you. The price

0:21

locked at 135. Trading starts in two

0:23

days. It's Rockets. It's Starlink. It's

0:25

XAI. all wrapped up into one ticker,

0:28

SPCX.

0:30

But remember, this company has lost

0:32

nearly $5 billion last year. The IPO is

0:35

priced at a hundred times sales. Elon is

0:37

keeping more than 80% of the voting

0:39

power. Some analysts are saying that

0:41

it's overvalued by about double. And

0:43

then there's Jim Kramer saying it's

0:45

undervalued and worth $5 trillion. The

0:48

right answer probably in there

0:49

somewhere. So, is this the most

0:52

accessible moonshot ever offered to

0:54

regular investors? Or are you the exit

0:57

liquidity for the smart money insiders

0:59

that are and you're about to blow up

1:00

your portfolio? Today on Dumb Money,

1:03

will the SpaceX IPO make you rich or are

1:06

you about to get wrecked? [music]

1:08

>> This is Dumb Money Live.

1:13

Hey there, Dave here along with Chris

1:14

and Jordan. We are Dumb Money. Welcome

1:16

to Dumb Money Live. If you're already

1:18

smashing the uh refresh button on your

1:20

brokerage app every 20 seconds trying to

1:22

get some allocation, take a second and

1:25

smash the like button. It will bring you

1:27

good luck. Uh Chris Jordan, the uh 30%

1:31

retail getting in on this biggest IPO in

1:33

history sounds generous, but is it

1:36

really? Because there's the valuation,

1:38

the losses, the control. I want to hear

1:41

from both of you um on your takes on the

1:44

real riskreward and how this is

1:46

different than when we invested in

1:47

SpaceX back around 2020. We have a lot

1:49

to talk about there, but first, are

1:52

either of you uh buying in on on

1:54

Thursday night?

1:56

>> I am not. Um I've got a lot of thoughts

1:59

here. Um,

2:01

uh, and you I don't know if this is the

2:03

right time to air all of them, but I

2:05

think, you know, look, we can argue over

2:09

valuation all day long. I'm pretty sure

2:12

that anybody here would think that I'm

2:15

not a big fan of the valuation here, and

2:16

I'm not. Um,

2:19

but I don't even think that that's the

2:20

whole story here, right? That's like

2:22

that's the small the the crazy valuation

2:25

is the smallest part of this story. And

2:28

I think that the real story is like what

2:32

is going on with banking regulations

2:35

with um with like the NASDAQ um with um

2:41

let's who else is MS0000

2:44

>> all relaxing their you know um you know

2:47

their standards for letting companies

2:49

into

2:51

um you know into their products. I

2:53

>> this is gonna be a spicy episode. I can

2:55

tell you right now.

2:56

>> Yeah. I just I just don't I just don't

2:57

think you know look I mean the valuation

2:59

will get worked out in the market over

3:01

time. Um now could it jump and then fall

3:04

and then do all sorts of stuff? I mean

3:05

we're talking four like so the float

3:08

will be initially like 4% of the total

3:12

value of the company. So you get a

3:14

really tight float. um you've got um a

3:17

ton of interest and you've got

3:19

competition with um all these ETFs and

3:23

uh um and

3:26

um and institutional money with retail

3:29

investors. So, I think you're just

3:30

looking for a really volatile stock in

3:33

the in the near term.

3:34

>> So, Jordan is out. Chris, are you in or

3:37

out?

3:39

Well, as you guys both know, anyone with

3:42

$100,000

3:44

could have easily invested in SpaceX at

3:47

any moment during the last 6 years at

3:50

valuations between roughly 30 billion

3:53

where we invested and 300 billion. So

3:58

anyone anyone with any amount of wealth

4:03

could have easily thrown money into this

4:05

company at a very tiny fraction of what

4:09

it's about to IPO at in the not

4:11

tooistant past. So

4:13

>> they kept raising money and kept giving

4:16

more opportunities for people like us to

4:19

get involved early on. I I've had about

4:23

8,000 opportunities to invest in SpaceX

4:25

over the past six years. And you know,

4:27

we we did we did invest in SpaceX,

4:29

right? We invested at about a $30

4:30

billion valuation.

4:32

>> Uh we were forced out of that fund uh a

4:36

few years later at 200 and something

4:39

billion, I think. I don't recall the

4:40

exact number. I

4:41

>> think it was 300.

4:42

>> Yeah. What's interesting about

4:43

>> I think we're in closer to 50 and out at

4:45

300.

4:46

>> Yeah. What's interesting about that

4:47

investment is that um kind of the

4:50

dynamics of what their proposed

4:53

situation to let shareholders be liquid

4:56

was totally different than what's

4:57

actually happening right now. Um and I

5:00

actually thought that was a really good

5:01

plan. what they had initially was to let

5:03

you invest in SpaceX and that they were

5:06

going to, you know, they were going to

5:08

take the internet portion um and say,

5:10

"Okay, we're going to um you know, we're

5:12

going to section that off and we'll IPO

5:14

that, but we're going to keep SpaceX um

5:17

private, right?" And so that was the way

5:19

to get, you know, early investor

5:21

liquidity. Um that's still probably the

5:25

only uh portion of the company that's

5:27

profitable right now. I think they've

5:29

got 60% margins. It's a it's a huge

5:32

portion of their uh 2025 revenue. Um so

5:37

it

5:37

>> Jordan, we all knew it was BS. Every

5:40

institutional investor back in 2020

5:43

saying, "Well, if you invest in SpaceX,

5:45

you have to hold that. We are never

5:47

going public. This is this is for the

5:49

good of humanity." BS. BS. I said BS

5:52

back then. Shut the hell up, dude. this

5:55

thing is

5:56

>> I did that the spinning off of Starlink

5:58

made sense as as a as its own IPO,

6:00

right? Because it's actually a

6:01

profitable business.

6:02

>> That back then that that was kind of the

6:04

the one portion of the business that

6:07

seemed like, oh, this could be the

6:08

liquidity event. A small portion of the

6:11

bigger company.

6:12

>> Yeah.

6:13

>> Yeah. So, here here we are again years

6:17

and years being able to invest in SpaceX

6:21

at at the time what seemed like an

6:23

insanely high valuation, right? But and

6:25

now it's now it's about to IPO at a very

6:29

high multiple of that. An insane

6:31

valuation. Yeah, we all know the company

6:33

bought 24x trailing sales.

6:37

You know, Bill

6:38

>> 100x trailing sales. Um if you take into

6:41

account these two contracts from Google

6:44

and Anthropic, um maybe you have a

6:48

forward number that's getting closer to

6:50

60 times sales. Um, depending on the

6:53

ramp up of these contracts, we don't

6:55

really know all the details there yet.

6:57

>> Yeah, I mean, Jordan, investors are

6:59

paying future perfect prices on this IPO

7:02

for a business that still needs an

7:04

enormous amount of

7:06

>> technical innovation. You know, has to

7:09

get through a lot of regulatory stuff to

7:10

get to where it needs to be, right? Um,

7:13

and a lot of capital market execution as

7:15

well. On the flip side, you have to

7:17

admit this is a retail market right now,

7:19

guys, and this is Elon and it's SpaceX

7:22

and the bullcase is pretty wild, right?

7:25

If there's one thing that Elon is great

7:27

at, it's selling the future. And the

7:31

amazing thing about SpaceX and what I

7:33

always loved about this company when we

7:35

invested in it back in 2020 is that you

7:39

couldn't disprove anything that Elon was

7:41

going to say because it'd be so far out

7:43

in the future. Elon could say, "Hey,

7:45

we're going to mine tens of trillions of

7:47

dollars worth of rare earths, and we're

7:49

the only company that could actually do

7:51

that." There are just an infinite number

7:54

of things that you can just claim that

7:56

the company will do in the future, such

7:58

as space data centers, which are of

8:00

course highly controversial. And you

8:03

know, I think most people that are

8:06

really deep in that uh that technology

8:09

feel it's probably seven to 10 years

8:11

away. uh will we even need space data

8:14

centers by the time they're actually

8:16

ready to fully scale meaning scale

8:20

deployment not just in theory but

8:22

actually able to fully scale out

8:24

deployment will we even need them and

8:26

what will the value of them be at that

8:28

point in time right so there are just so

8:31

many questions here but there will

8:33

always be an amazing narrative around

8:35

SpaceX that investors who are in the

8:37

company can claim well here's how we are

8:40

going to get to this valuation ation.

8:42

Here's how we're going to get to a $10

8:44

trillion valuation. Here's how we're

8:46

going to get to a $50 trillion

8:48

valuation. You could just make up

8:50

anything because it's space.

8:52

>> Yeah.

8:52

>> We don't even know what the hell's going

8:53

on right up there in perpetuity, right?

8:56

So, we could be like, we're going to

8:58

reivilize

9:00

something that we've never even seen

9:02

before off of Mars.

9:04

>> Well, correct. You could be like, "Hey,

9:06

when when we need to get people from

9:08

here to that planet, SpaceX is the only

9:10

company and they could charge whatever

9:11

they want." I mean, you could just keep

9:13

making up story after story. And I have

9:15

a feeling that's exactly what's going to

9:19

happen. The same way we started hearing

9:21

information about uh, you know, data

9:24

centers in space. Listen, Elon has spent

9:27

the last two years talking about how

9:30

robots and humanoids would be infinitely

9:33

larger than anything else that Tesla did

9:36

put together. And we were going to have

9:38

the robot at this date doing this. And

9:40

here we are right in June of 2026. their

9:44

robot program appears to be meaningfully

9:46

behind uh some of the others even with

9:49

the infinite resources that Elon has

9:52

access to and quite honestly a fairly

9:55

large head start as well. So we haven't

9:57

really seen the level of execution

10:00

across the spectrum of things that Elon

10:03

can do. Let's talk about the sub company

10:06

of XAI. XAI was supposed to be a massive

10:10

leading frontier lab, right? it was

10:12

going to be right up there with OI and

10:14

with Anthropic. And the truth is, I've

10:15

been saying this for two and a half

10:16

years and everyone got pissed at me.

10:19

They never had a chance. They never had

10:21

a chance to actually capture revenue

10:23

from end consumers or end business. And

10:26

I always said they would ultimately just

10:28

end up being a data center because they

10:30

did not have the skill set to properly

10:33

position that company uh to

10:38

play in the the game that OI and

10:40

Anthropic was playing with enterprise or

10:42

with consumers and they did

10:44

>> which is exactly what's happening if you

10:45

look at the contracts that uh that

10:47

Google and Anthropic are um committing

10:50

to SpaceX.

10:52

>> Jordan, that's exactly what I said. it

10:53

would end up being a data center company

10:55

because that's the one just building

10:58

what Elon is amazing at amazing at

11:01

>> is simply uh financial engineering

11:05

raising infinite amounts of capital

11:07

placing companies underneath each other

11:09

IPOing what needs to be IPOed in order

11:11

to get the capital to actually do the

11:13

thing that essentially he's [snorts]

11:16

great at doing which is just moving a

11:18

million miles an hour right with

11:20

something with with his data center

11:21

projects to build now the biggest data

11:23

center in the world by a factor of like

11:25

I don't know what is it like 10 or 30.

11:27

It's the terrafab. Uh so by the way I

11:31

think that's probably a really smart

11:33

strategy for Elon and SpaceX. But we

11:36

have to admit that XAI wasn't what it

11:39

was supposed to be. X is not what it's

11:42

supposed to be. I don't know of a single

11:43

major content creator on X that's happy

11:46

with X today. All right. Like not a

11:48

single one. It's like I I every single

11:51

major content creator on X is like

11:53

completely distraught uh with what's h

11:56

what been happening on X the last two

11:57

years, two and a half years. Um so

12:00

SpaceX is a special company. We all know

12:02

that, right? Uh SpaceX, you know, didn't

12:06

ask for permission. It asked for

12:08

forgiveness. They just moved at a

12:10

million miles an hour in terms of their

12:11

buildout, their innovation. I heard, you

12:14

know, they just did whatever they had to

12:16

do uh to get those rockets off. I mean,

12:18

that's kind of the story uh that a lot

12:21

of people know about behind the scenes.

12:23

Uh they didn't necessarily go through

12:25

proper channels uh in in terms of

12:28

building out that program and it worked

12:29

for them. SpaceX is miraculous. Like

12:32

SpaceX is one of the most spectacular

12:34

companies we have ever seen in our life

12:37

and the innovation there has just been

12:39

ridiculous. It's an amazing company.

12:41

Like I don't think anybody would argue

12:43

that SpaceX is an insanely amazing

12:45

company. It's just the valuation, right?

12:47

I love the company. I love the vision. I

12:50

love what they've done historically. I

12:52

love what they have the chance to do. I

12:54

just don't love it as an investment at

12:56

these prices.

12:58

>> Dude, I mean, why would we pay 6x what

13:02

we could have bought this for like just

13:04

a very short time ago, right? Here's

13:07

>> I'm kicking myself for not buying back

13:10

in, you know, a couple years ago.

13:13

>> Who knows what's going to happen between

13:14

now and 180 days from what, Thursday? So

13:17

you know maybe you get the chance again.

13:19

>> So that that's the thing that this

13:21

company has a really small float. They

13:23

are going to accelerate the entry into

13:26

at least some of the indexes meaning

13:28

that the indexes will be forced to

13:31

purchase off of a very small float. So

13:34

there's essentially a massive tailwind

13:37

and almost like a floor on this stock at

13:40

least from my perspective. So, it feels

13:44

like the stock probably should do okay

13:47

or pretty good unless people are

13:49

figuring out ways early on to hedge

13:52

their positions that they're looking to

13:53

liquidate uh once they're able to

13:56

liquidate those positions, right? And

13:58

Elon has this tiered structure where the

14:01

better the stock does, the the more you

14:03

could liquidate early. Like if a stock

14:05

is up 30% from its IPO, I think uh

14:09

investors are allowed to start

14:10

liquidating that stock. Listen, here's

14:13

the thing, guys. It It's really hard to

14:16

assess how this does over the next 6 to

14:19

12 months. Just really difficult. I

14:22

think investors are falling into a trap,

14:25

not because they choose to invest in

14:28

SpaceX, but because they choose to spend

14:31

so much of their time uh researching and

14:36

thinking about SpaceX. If you want to

14:38

invest in SpaceX, fine, do it. But if

14:40

you're spending an or or an an un an

14:43

ordinary amount of your time reading,

14:46

you know, expost and articles and

14:49

thinking about SpaceX, that I think is

14:52

the biggest investment mistake that

14:54

you've made all year because there are

14:56

so many great investment opportunities

14:59

right now and you're just spinning your

15:01

wheels following the herd, doing what

15:02

all the other idiotic investors do,

15:04

which is wasting their time on something

15:07

that they should be spending maybe 15

15:10

analyzing and making a decision on.

15:12

There are some trades here around

15:13

SpaceX. We can talk about those. I think

15:15

I think this IPO

15:18

um is going to lead to some interesting

15:23

I would say I think it will increase it

15:27

increases my conviction on some other

15:30

stocks. Right. We we should maybe talk

15:32

about that.

15:34

Do you want to talk for a second about

15:36

uh the confusion over the ticker symbol

15:37

and that other space sounding ticker

15:40

that that like blew up a few weeks ago

15:43

and then people realized and then it

15:44

just dumped?

15:45

>> It it happens.

15:47

>> Investors are so dumb.

15:49

>> Investors, guys,

15:51

>> dumb money is really dumb.

15:52

>> I'm I'm not going to rip I'm not going

15:54

to rip on any retail investor for being

15:56

dumb. The name of our channel is Dumb

15:58

Money. And the whole point is it's okay.

16:01

You're going to learn. The way that you

16:03

learn is losing money, right? So, and

16:05

there are a lot of

16:06

>> We all learned the We all learned that

16:08

way. So, there's nothing wrong with

16:10

losing money to

16:11

>> Hey, I have fat fingered a ticker symbol

16:13

and ended up with a whole bunch of

16:15

shares of something that I don't even

16:16

know.

16:17

>> I know you've done it, Chris. I know

16:19

you've done it.

16:20

>> He's done it live on the show before. He

16:22

It's This is I'm talking about like when

16:24

we were young and just starting out as

16:26

investors, like having crazy conviction

16:29

over things that were just stupid.

16:31

Yeah, but then there's also Chris fat

16:33

fingering a uh ticker symbol wrong.

16:36

>> Three times this year, guys. Three times

16:38

this year on like huge trades, huge like

16:41

options trades.

16:43

>> You have you have to go through the

16:45

process. Investing is a process, right?

16:48

Like and people like to this is you know

16:51

what this is the equivalent of investing

16:54

has become

16:56

uh people's personality, right? in 2026.

17:00

It's become a lifestyle and SpaceX is

17:02

the blockbuster movie. It's coming out

17:04

this week and investors want to feel

17:07

connected. They want to feel a sense of

17:09

community. They want to feel connected

17:10

to each other. It's an exciting

17:12

storyline. It's almost like a binary

17:14

bet. Everyone's trying to figure out

17:16

what's going to happen. Everybody wants

17:17

to put their bets in. I get it. I don't

17:19

think there's anything necessarily wrong

17:20

with that. But just understand

17:22

something. If that's who you are as an

17:26

investor, then don't look back in five

17:28

years and wonder why you're generating

17:30

something that's roughly close to market

17:32

returns and why you're not generating 2x

17:35

market returns or 3x market returns

17:37

because the guys that are doing that are

17:40

not spending 20 hours thinking about

17:43

SpaceX this week. They are looking at

17:45

names that they are actually going to

17:47

three, four, five, 6x on that aren't

17:50

called Space X in the near future. not

17:53

like in the distant future.

17:56

>> Near future though we have SpaceX isn't

17:59

the only mega IPO that we're talking

18:01

about. So OpenAI just yesterday

18:04

announced that they are uh going public.

18:08

Uh they posted a blog. They're not yet

18:10

saying when uh their last uh valuation

18:13

was 850 billion. And then last week we

18:16

had Anthropic at 965 billion. uh after

18:20

raising an additional 65 billion that

18:22

Anthropic uh last week announced that

18:25

they're going public. So what is an

18:27

investor to do to split their funny

18:29

money amongst all of these IPOs?

18:33

>> Guys, I if you're if you want to be a

18:35

great investor, the time to be making

18:37

those moves were months ago, years ago

18:40

on SpaceX, right? So like we when we

18:42

invested in SpaceX, we had a thesis that

18:46

Elon would continue to kind of paint

18:49

this picture of what SpaceX is capable

18:51

of because it was a space company. It

18:54

would be hard to disprove that retail

18:56

investors would pour into the IPO and we

19:00

would make an insane amount of money

19:01

throwing our money in at 30 something

19:03

billion and exiting at something much

19:05

larger than that. Now that's exactly the

19:07

way this played out other than

19:08

[clears throat] throwing out the fun. We

19:10

weren't thinking the the logic at the

19:13

time was that SpaceX was never going to

19:16

IPO and that hopefully there would be

19:18

something that was a spin-off.

19:19

>> That was that was never my logic. That

19:21

that

19:23

said

19:24

>> that's what they have to go back and

19:25

watch old episodes to see if you might

19:26

have uh said that too.

19:28

>> No, that that that we all knew SpaceX

19:31

was going to IPO. The exit was always

19:34

going to be the IPO, right? Um, and

19:37

whether they IPOed or basically IPOed

19:40

every single facet of SpaceX separately,

19:42

it didn't really matter, right?

19:44

>> No, that that's where that's where I

19:46

thought our heads were at the time is

19:48

that we have Starlink that can IPO. We

19:50

have all these technologies that are

19:52

offshoots of the master rocket company

19:56

that they might IPO independently.

19:59

>> Yeah. I mean, it it really doesn't

20:00

matter either way, right? The bottom

20:03

line is we were investing

20:07

early knowing that that was an

20:10

inevitability. Now we're here at the

20:12

inevitability and I have not a whole lot

20:15

of interest investing today because I'm

20:17

not sure that there's anything that I'm

20:19

aware of related to SpaceX that other

20:22

investors aren't. There's a lot of

20:24

debate, but man, this valuation is is

20:28

absolutely wild, guys. I just I'm

20:31

staying away from it here. I just don't

20:33

care about it. I care about other things

20:34

in this market. I think there are

20:37

companies that will benefit from this

20:38

IPO. They're what are they getting? 80

20:40

billion, Jordan. Is that roughly around

20:43

what they're getting?

20:44

>> Somewhere like 75 billion uh I think is

20:46

what the

20:47

>> So they're getting 75 billion. You have

20:49

to ask yourself where's that money

20:50

going? Um I think the most interesting

20:53

partnership that SpaceX has right now is

20:56

Intel. We all know that the future of

20:59

AI, at least over the next five years,

21:03

is really oriented around fabrication

21:06

and chips. And that Intel partnership is

21:09

super interesting to me. I've heard

21:12

some, you know, some people in my

21:13

network have even talked to me about the

21:16

possibility of SpaceX trying to acquire

21:18

Intel. I think there might be some

21:20

regulatory issues there. I think they'd

21:22

probably like to acquire Intel. whether

21:25

they actually acquire the company or do

21:27

what Jensen did at Nvidia recently with

21:31

one of his acquisitions where they just

21:33

basically acquire the parts, right? Or

21:35

they they they structure deals to where

21:37

they have exclusive access and licenses

21:40

to the technology uh to the chipsets

21:44

that essentially is the same as them

21:46

acquiring Intel. either way or even if

21:48

they just end up spending a ton of money

21:50

with Intel because Intel is an early

21:52

partner of Terraab. Uh they're obviously

21:56

uh closely associated with the United

22:00

States, which we know Elon uh loves

22:03

deals like that because it gives him

22:05

advantages in DC trying to get those

22:07

deals done.

22:08

>> Yeah,

22:09

>> I think Intel's really interesting here.

22:11

I think Intel is almost like a call

22:13

option on SpaceX and the success of

22:17

SpaceX uh in uh AI. Now that said, Elon

22:23

has also talked about obviously

22:25

developing his own chips in which case I

22:30

think you know Jordan if he goes down

22:33

that road would you agree um you kind of

22:37

have to move to you know some of the uh

22:40

fabrication companies themselves right

22:43

uh ASMI

22:45

uh those would be the beneficiaries of

22:48

him actually getting in the chip

22:50

business Right. But then really across

22:52

the entire spectrum of AI, especially

22:54

Nvidia, I I think no matter what, Nvidia

22:57

is going to be the cornerstone of his

23:01

kind of AI infrastructure buildout. So

23:04

that's a positive for Nvidia as well. So

23:06

these aren't necessarily sexy trades,

23:09

but it's yet another massive tailwind

23:14

supporting AI infrastructure. And if you

23:17

do your homework on SpaceX, you can kind

23:19

of see which of those players is most

23:22

likely to benefit most. Even SMCI,

23:25

right? Uh they are a company that I

23:28

think was a key infrastructure supplier

23:31

to Elon's last major uh AI factory.

23:35

>> SMCI just got a big contract. I don't

23:37

remember who through. The problem with

23:39

SMCI is that they are just not a trusted

23:43

name anymore with some of the scandals

23:45

that they've been through. Well, they

23:46

weren't a trusted name before. They're

23:48

not a trusted name now, and that's kind

23:50

of a known. Yeah.

23:52

>> But if Elon's coming into this money and

23:54

he's about to do the biggest fab the

23:57

biggest data factory ever, right, by

24:00

like an insane like factor of 10 or 30,

24:04

whatever it is, over any other data

24:06

factory and SMCI is providing liquid

24:10

cooled um infrastructure there. That's a

24:14

real needle mover for them, wouldn't you

24:16

say? So, like in my head, I'm thinking

24:18

SMCI, I'm thinking Nvidia, I'm thinking

24:20

Intel. Uh, these are companies that are

24:24

likely to benefit more than others from

24:28

this general success of SpaceX.

24:33

So, that that's where my head is going,

24:35

at least if I wanted to play this in any

24:38

way.

24:43

What do you guys think?

24:44

>> All right. So, what else? I It sounds

24:47

like No, nobody on on this Zoom call is

24:50

interested in uh SpaceX, and I'm I've

24:53

been watching the uh the chat.

24:55

>> Oh, really?

24:56

>> Yeah.

24:57

>> Good.

24:58

>> I mean, there are definitely some

25:00

believers, but um

25:01

>> yeah,

25:02

>> I I'm not seeing an overwhelming I wish

25:04

we could do a little poll, but I'm I'm

25:06

not seeing an overwhelming excitement

25:07

over it.

25:09

I I

25:10

>> I'm just saying it's a circus, right? Um

25:12

I'm surprised that Goldman's pushing uh

25:14

this hard on it.

25:17

>> Well, again, Jordan, I think that was

25:20

probably part of the deal, right? It's

25:22

like this this did not get priced. Elon

25:26

came out and said, "Here's what it is."

25:28

And essentially dared Wall Street to not

25:31

support him.

25:32

>> Are you not are you really not going to

25:34

support this deal? Do you want to be

25:36

left out of SpaceX?

25:38

And they're kind of their hand is forced

25:42

on this. And I think they're smart

25:44

enough to know that over the long run,

25:47

you can't disprove SpaceX either. It

25:49

doesn't really matter what what the

25:51

profits are, Jordan. Doesn't really

25:53

matter what the revenue is because

25:54

there's always going to be a new bucket

25:56

of revenue on the horizon for SpaceX.

26:00

That's three years away. That's four

26:01

years away.

26:02

>> End of the rainbow. That's infinitely

26:04

larger than anything that any company on

26:07

earth is doing today. And nobody else

26:09

>> trillion dollar XAI TAM by the way. Um,

26:12

you feel good about that?

26:14

>> The what?

26:15

>> The 28 trillion XAI TAN that's proposed

26:19

by the S1.

26:22

>> Dude, we're getting to a point in the

26:26

market, Jordan. And I know you're kind

26:28

of old school like me, even though I'm

26:29

technically older school than you, but

26:31

you think older school than me.

26:33

>> I'm older school than you. You're older.

26:35

Uh [laughter] that's it chronologically.

26:39

>> Fine. Um but I know this stuff bothers

26:42

you. It actually bothers me a lot.

26:44

>> Yeah. I it it bothers me a lot because

26:48

we no longer have kind of like a

26:52

backbone

26:54

of responsible

26:56

kind of like financial

27:00

uh

27:02

what's like governance, right? Like

27:03

>> Yeah. Well, I mean, look, so part of it

27:05

is that um kind of the trend lately is

27:08

for courts to um kind of push back on,

27:12

you know, some of the regulations that

27:14

were built around DOD um and uh kind of

27:18

turn those into self-governance for

27:21

corporations. And we all know how

27:22

self-governance works, right? So, um,

27:25

you get, you know, you get investment

27:27

banks, uh, uh, pushing deals and, um,

27:33

and there's really no oversight. Um, I

27:36

hate to say no oversight. There's

27:38

oversight, but it's,

27:40

um, you know, I feel like in the kind of

27:42

the current political environment, we're

27:44

kind of pro just pushing it out there.

27:47

>> Let's be more clear about it. I think

27:51

these companies, these regulatory

27:53

organizations, everyone involved

27:56

essentially is just an assembly of

27:57

humans and every human in 2026 is out

28:00

for themselves and everybody just wants

28:02

to make their money now because no one

28:04

knows what the future is going to bring.

28:06

Everyone's a little intimidated and

28:07

scared by the AI age that's rapidly

28:10

approaching and everybody wants to make

28:14

money for themselves. Now, this is part

28:16

of the political spectrum that has kind

28:19

of evolved over the past few years. It's

28:21

the business world. Uh, everyone's out

28:23

for themselves. Nobody cares. Nobody

28:26

cares about anything else than make

28:28

other than just making some quick money.

28:31

So, I I think the same thing goes for

28:33

Goldman, the sellside banks. Uh, they

28:36

want these deals. No one knows where

28:38

they're going to be working in two

28:39

years. So, they really don't care if

28:41

they screw the reputation of their

28:43

department. Uh, by the way, people don't

28:47

seem to be punished for any of that

28:49

stuff anymore. So, why would anybody

28:51

care? Like, why would they care? Like,

28:54

like it's no, we talked about this a

28:56

couple years ago.

28:58

>> Nobody cares because we haven't had a

28:59

catastrophe since, you know, 2000.

29:03

>> Why would they care even if we had a

29:04

catastrophe? As long as they get theirs,

29:07

right? Yeah, that's but that's when

29:08

that's when Yeah, that's when uh

29:10

lawsuits and congressional oversight

29:12

starts to kick in and you start to, you

29:14

know, potentially put people in in jail,

29:17

right?

29:17

>> Oh, potentially like 2008

29:21

potentially ended up in jail.

29:23

>> Have you not heard crime is legal in

29:24

2026? It just takes a million dollar

29:26

donation these days.

29:28

the the the integrity of financial

29:32

markets, [laughter]

29:34

guys. Guys, the integrity of financial

29:36

markets is not just broken. It's gone.

29:38

It's over. It's over. We we said this in

29:40

2008. In 2008, when when we just allowed

29:45

that to just happen and just nothing

29:48

ended up happening with any of the

29:49

people involved, right? We said at some

29:52

point in the future this would unravel

29:54

the entire uh financial system and and

29:56

and there would be that's where we are

29:59

today. It took 20 years almost 20 years.

30:02

Nobody cares. They just want to make

30:04

money right now for themselves, their

30:07

family. They they just want money. Like

30:09

that's just what it is. I don't know why

30:10

anyone's just not saying that. Everybody

30:12

just wants some cash. So, no matter

30:15

where you are on Wall Street, you you're

30:17

going to do whatever it takes to to get

30:19

your to get your piece and and that's

30:22

where we are and and it's disgusting.

30:25

I I would prefer that I'm the only

30:27

person out to get some cash and that

30:29

everyone else is was being prudent. Uh

30:32

[laughter] but but everyone's out to get

30:34

cash.

30:34

>> But but Chris, you don't do shady stuff.

30:36

>> I know. But I'm not involved in company,

30:38

right?

30:39

>> I'm not managing a company, right? So

30:41

that's the thing. I'm just trading. So,

30:42

like but thinking back to our good

30:45

friend Trevor Milton and the Nicola uh

30:48

you know

30:49

>> Tesla adjacent the Nicola Motors uh

30:52

fiasco and that dude is not in jail.

30:55

>> Notard,

30:57

>> you're exactly right. Trevor Milton is

30:59

out.

31:00

>> Why would anybody Trump's pardon him?

31:03

>> Oh yeah.

31:04

>> Yes, dude. It not only did he get

31:07

pardoned, but no one even talked about

31:09

it for more than 15 minutes. That's when

31:11

I knew for sure nothing matters anymore.

31:15

>> And by the way, like if if I was in a in

31:18

a fiduciary role, I would not be doing

31:21

any of that stuff. But I'm just here

31:23

trading, right? I'm just here investing,

31:25

working for myself. I only answer to

31:27

myself.

31:28

It makes me sick. I know Jordan makes

31:31

you sick. I don't know if Dave cares.

31:33

Dave, if you care. [laughter]

31:34

>> I don't care. Doesn't matter anymore.

31:36

Nothing matters anymore. [laughter]

31:39

>> You don't care. Uh let's [clears throat]

31:41

talk about some stocks. So there are a

31:42

couple of stocks that have been uh

31:44

blowing up in the comments. People

31:46

wanting thoughts on Amazon and whether

31:48

we're still quadrupling down. Uh I did I

31:52

did quadruple down. Uh

31:55

I mean I'm in Amazon right now. It's not

31:57

been a great week. I am somewhat

32:00

concerned. I I put out a post on X last

32:02

week. I'm somewhat concerned about

32:04

Amazon

32:06

u going down the road of what Meta and

32:09

Google did and issuing a huge

32:13

uh debt round. Now, I'm not actually

32:16

concerned about it. I'm just concerned

32:18

about the shortterm market reaction when

32:21

that happens. My assumption is that it's

32:23

already happening and that it's getting

32:25

leaked and that's some of the pressure

32:27

that we've seen on Amazon this past

32:29

year.

32:29

>> Yeah. I don't think it's just a concern.

32:30

I almost think it's a inevitability,

32:33

right? Um

32:34

>> yeah,

32:35

>> because Google um is gonna throw another

32:38

80 billion dollars, you know, down the

32:40

um hardware path and Amazon has to they

32:43

have to go toe for toe, right? Um

32:46

>> Jordan Jordan, I think I think I think

32:48

you're right. And I'm just kind of like

32:51

waiting on that to happen before I go

32:55

one level deeper on Amazon. I don't

32:58

>> I bought a little bit more Amazon in

32:59

this whole um in the last couple of days

33:02

with this whole uh flush out. Um

33:05

>> I I think the

33:07

>> crazy just you know an extra few

33:09

percentage points to my position

33:12

>> for for for me the the the best

33:14

perspective on Amazon here is to wait

33:16

for that shoe to drop. I think it's

33:18

going to happen within days to weeks.

33:20

when it happens, I think the stock is

33:22

going to drop and I think it will

33:24

quickly recover from it. So, I am

33:29

holding some cash on the side or some

33:31

leverage on the side, prepared to go

33:33

meaningfully deeper in Amazon if and

33:36

when that happens. I'm not expecting a

33:39

whole lot of Amazon until we get clarity

33:42

one way or the other on how much debt. I

33:46

mean, I think it's going to at this

33:47

point I think it's going to come down to

33:48

how much. It's not even whether they do

33:50

it or not.

33:51

>> 60 to 100 billion range probably, right?

33:54

>> I I think if it's 60, the market's going

33:56

to be chill with it. I think if it's 100

33:58

or 120 or

34:00

>> gosh, if it's more than that, Amazon

34:03

could get hit again, which would be fine

34:06

by me. I think they should raise another

34:08

200, honestly. Just raise 200. Um, I'd

34:11

be happy with that, but no one else

34:13

would be happy with that.

34:14

>> No, it it'd kill the stock temporarily.

34:18

So,

34:18

>> all right. Another one people have been

34:19

asking about Robin Hood.

34:22

>> Yeah, I mean cry crypto is a dumpster

34:25

fire still that will continue to

34:26

pressure Robin Hood. Other than that, I

34:29

see Robin Hood

34:32

>> being exactly the same company that I've

34:34

been investing in the last two years. I

34:36

think it's still the largest financial

34:37

tune on Earth in the next two decades.

34:39

And

34:40

>> we got Bitcoin in the low60s now.

34:43

>> Yeah.

34:44

>> I I don't need to trade Robin Hood. I

34:46

don't necessarily care about Robin Hood

34:48

in the short run. I have a healthy Robin

34:50

Hood position. I'm considering putting

34:53

more money into Robin Hood. I haven't

34:55

yet. I I'd like to see it drop a bit

34:58

more here. It's getting hurt with

35:00

crypto. You know, the worse crypto gets

35:03

hit, the harder that Robin Hood's going

35:06

to get hit. That's just the way it is in

35:07

the short run because they still are

35:09

meaningfully tied

35:10

>> to crypto trading. So, it's not a pretty

35:13

picture for Robin Hood in the short run

35:16

if crypto continues to show weakness,

35:19

which I wouldn't be surprised if that

35:22

was the case. So, it's not something I

35:24

think about hardly ever.

35:27

Um, people asking about our our our

35:30

Caesar wrap.

35:31

>> Y,

35:32

>> that was a controversial one.

35:33

>> Y

35:34

>> All right. So, sweet. And I will say I I

35:37

checked to see how I did because I was

35:39

in options and short-term options so

35:42

kept having to uh you know extend and

35:44

and I tripled my money on SG and I'm no

35:49

longer in it.

35:50

>> And you're no longer in it. Okay. So, I

35:53

would have at least tripled my money,

35:55

but as I mentioned on our last show, I

35:59

think part of the reason, well, I

36:01

wouldn't say like initially part of the

36:03

bump on Robin Hood was our our not Robin

36:06

Hood, excuse me, of Sweet Green,

36:07

>> Sweet Green

36:08

>> was us bringing eyeballs to it. Then JP

36:12

Morgan came out and

36:15

uh they they upgraded the stock uh for

36:19

some of the same reasons that that that

36:20

we were interested. I did not sell any

36:23

of my Sweet Green. Okay, guys. So, I'm

36:25

still in my Sweet Green position. I just

36:27

didn't want to. I would have made about

36:29

$700,000 if I would have sold. Uh, so I

36:32

just want everyone watching this show

36:34

right now to know that when Sweet Green

36:37

was up, I kind of wanted to sell because

36:39

I was like, "Wow, this is

36:41

this is great, right? Like I don't

36:43

necessarily need to take any additional

36:44

risk here, but I told people I wasn't

36:46

going to do it." So I could sell at any

36:48

moment now, right? Like I can sell

36:50

today, I can sell tomorrow, and I I will

36:52

at some point, but for now, I'm still in

36:56

sweet green. When we put on that Sweet

36:58

Green trade, we were pretty clear about

37:00

what we were doing. It was a probability

37:03

outcome trade. The data was incomplete.

37:05

It was early. We thought that there was

37:08

a reasonable chance that this could

37:11

become a game-changing moment for the

37:13

company if the trend continued. We don't

37:15

yet know if the trend is going to

37:17

continue or not. I said it would take at

37:19

least weeks of more data to determine

37:22

that. So, what I did know is that if the

37:26

trend continued, this is going to be a

37:28

six or seven or 8x return for me based

37:31

on the options that I purchased. And if

37:34

it didn't work out, I would probably

37:36

lose maybe half of my money, maybe the

37:40

entirety of my investment. So, I loved

37:42

the riskreward. I loved the probability

37:46

outcome of having a 30 to 35% chance of

37:50

making six to eight times my money. That

37:53

was my trade. Uh I still think that

37:57

trade exists today. We don't have enough

38:00

visibility into the ultimate success of

38:03

these sweet green wraps. My concern for

38:07

Sweet Grain is that they are getting hit

38:11

so hard just generally by competitors

38:14

who are doing better like Cabba that the

38:19

success of the rap product at Sweet

38:23

Green might not be enough to actually

38:27

combat the continued

38:31

uh competition getting just taking more

38:35

more and more of their business. Sweet

38:37

Green is a really clean product, guys.

38:39

They don't use seed oils for the most

38:42

part, whereas their competitors, I

38:44

believe Cava and them do. And I think

38:47

maybe people just like the taste profile

38:50

of some of the competing products as

38:53

opposed to Sweet Green, which is a

38:55

cleaner profile taste. I love the Sweet

38:59

Green Wrap. I thought it was awesome. I

39:02

thought that tortilla was super fresh. I

39:05

think the entire wrap was super fresh.

39:07

>> Have you ordered it again since your on

39:10

air tasting though?

39:12

>> What?

39:12

>> Have you ordered it again since you

39:14

tried it on the show?

39:16

>> Well, I won't have any wraps because I'm

39:18

not I'm not taking carbs. So, like it

39:21

has nothing to do with sweet green. But

39:22

yes, I I have had it again. I had I went

39:24

back and I had it I had sweet green one

39:26

time, not the wrap because I I can't I

39:29

can't do the carbs uh in the middle of

39:31

the day.

39:32

>> Sweet green actually uh green today um

39:35

surprisingly enough. So that's good.

39:37

>> I just I just have a real hard time

39:40

wrapping my head around software

39:42

multiples for uh you know chain

39:45

restaurants. Uh it's just not it's not

39:48

something that I'm going to do.

39:50

>> Okay. But again, it has nothing to do

39:53

with it has nothing to do with being a

39:56

long-term investor, Jordan. So, if the

39:59

multiples were

40:00

>> What I'm saying though is that

40:02

what I'm saying is that you've got an

40:04

unstable base of just valuation sitting

40:06

underneath this really good idea.

40:09

>> Okay, fine. But I think the valuations

40:12

the the concept the idea sound but

40:13

you're sitting on this base of a company

40:16

that's just sitting on these

40:19

>> you know insane valuations like kind of

40:21

like Cava or Sweet all these guys are

40:23

just they're getting these crazy

40:24

multiples.

40:25

>> Okay, I'm I'm not even saying I disagree

40:28

with that at all. I don't trade these

40:31

companies generally. I I might

40:32

completely agree with you. What I'm

40:34

saying is the valuations for that sector

40:37

or that company are what they are before

40:41

a new

40:42

>> Yeah. No, I get it. So, you're not Yeah,

40:43

but I'm just saying that maybe I don't

40:46

stable base if there is any uh if there

40:48

is any volatility.

40:50

>> Yeah. If if I'm trading something for a

40:52

few weeks to a couple months, my

40:53

assumption is that I won't get uh that I

40:56

will not get a valuation

40:58

uh compression in multiples

41:01

>> during that time. Yeah.

41:02

>> And if they're simply able to show an

41:04

increase in revenue and profit that the

41:05

value, the multiple stay relatively the

41:08

same over my short trade window,

41:10

>> right, and it'll all work out. But I

41:12

agree, Jordan. I do not necessarily

41:15

disagree with what you're saying.

41:16

>> Yeah.

41:18

>> Sweet Green is not a company that I

41:19

would be investing in long term. Much

41:20

like I've I'm on the record saying

41:22

airlines are, you know, an entire

41:25

industry that I will never invest in

41:26

long term. But there are times that you

41:28

can play them. And for Sweet Green, I

41:30

was buying options that were expiring

41:31

like one and two days out. And then I

41:33

just kept kept doing it. And I lost all

41:36

my money on the last ones, but on the

41:38

way up, I was up. And it wasn't I wasn't

41:41

3x. It was 150% gain.

41:44

>> Oh, that's great.

41:45

>> Even after my complete loss on the last

41:47

round of options.

41:49

>> Yeah.

41:50

>> No, that that that that's awesome.

41:52

Here's here this is actually okay

41:55

wrapping it back to the SpaceX IPO. I

41:58

thought this was a good question. If you

42:00

get allocation, how do you treat it? Do

42:02

you sell it immediately on open? Do you

42:05

hang on to it? What do you What do you

42:06

do if you actually buy it on IPO day?

42:10

>> I don't really know, man. I I it's just

42:12

it's too hard to predict. Again, I think

42:15

it's

42:16

>> for me, it's something that could go up

42:17

50% or down 50% in a week and I would

42:20

not be shocked either way.

42:22

>> I think it's really important as an

42:24

investor not to act like Jim Kramer and

42:28

say when you don't know. Okay. So, like

42:30

I actually don't know what's going to

42:33

happen with SpaceX. I do not know if

42:35

over the 6 months whether the amount of

42:38

SpaceX supply that's going to be coming

42:40

in from people that have held it for

42:41

seven years and are on huge gains is

42:44

going to outweigh the retail demand the

42:47

the index in

42:50

most that now have SpaceX in it

42:52

overnight. But most importantly, the

42:54

hype cycle of everything this company is

42:57

going to be in two years, 5 years, 10

42:59

years, 20 years, right? So, like it's

43:00

really hard to tell how people will

43:02

react to that stuff because you can't

43:05

apply normal logic to it because if Elon

43:09

comes out and says or some analyst comes

43:11

out and says, "Hey, they're going to

43:14

mine$10 trillion dollars of space rock

43:16

for rare earths starting in 2034."

43:20

>> Yeah.

43:21

>> What are you gonna say to that? like

43:22

like then there's going to be a fight

43:24

that no one's going to listen to because

43:26

everyone has short attention spans. No

43:27

one's reading a 20page report or

43:29

rebuttal on that. They're just seeing

43:31

the headline and like wow it's another10

43:33

trillion dollars for SpaceX and maybe

43:35

that actually works and gets SpaceX to

43:38

pump. Now was the analyst or the hedge

43:40

fund or whoever that wrote the initial

43:43

report did they actually think that or

43:46

were they trying to pump that? Does it

43:47

even matter? This is the market in 2020.

43:50

Intentions. Uh, intentions are one

43:52

thing, but in message sent is not always

43:54

message received. So, yeah, who knows?

43:57

Th

43:58

>> this is what I freaking hate about

44:02

investing in 2026. There's not like a

44:05

really solid baseline for for rational

44:10

thinking, right? So, you just have to

44:12

know that going in. SpaceX is is is

44:15

really difficult to assess, I think. So,

44:17

I I just don't know. I'd probably sell

44:20

half because I just don't know. Okay. I

44:23

would focus on something I do know more

44:25

about.

44:28

Uh yeah, we need to do the peptide. I I

44:31

guys, I apologize. We said we were going

44:33

to do the peptide episode. We're still

44:35

working on research. We will do the

44:37

peptide episode. We're going to do

44:39

another fun episode

44:41

uh talking about the upcoming uh GTA

44:46

launch this holiday season. Why are we

44:49

talking about that in June? Because if

44:52

you wait until October, the trade might

44:56

be over. So, we need to analyze GT.

45:00

>> We did we did have some people talking

45:01

about Take Two in the comments. So, that

45:03

is a that's a good update.

45:06

We're not saying it's a good investment

45:07

or a bad investment. What we're saying

45:09

is

45:10

>> we need to address it.

45:11

>> The time to make your decision on Take

45:15

Two and the GTA release is coming up

45:18

shortly this summer. You cannot wait

45:20

until fall. The second that kids get

45:23

back in school, that's too late to be

45:26

tra you. You need you need to know what

45:28

you're doing right before then. So, it's

45:31

at a really nice place where like

45:34

I I think this will be an interesting

45:36

episode because we're either going to

45:37

put on a big long trade or we're not.

45:40

We're mid research. So, we have more

45:42

work to do.

45:44

>> We're either going to do something or

45:45

we're not going to do something, but we

45:46

will do a show. That's that's

45:49

>> the trade. I'm putting my trade on. I'm

45:51

not waiting. I I'm going to put my GTA

45:54

trade on by the end of July. That will

45:57

happen. I'm not waiting until August to

45:59

put on my GTA trade. If there is a

46:02

trade, I'll make my decision in July.

46:07

All right, what else we got, guys?

46:09

>> We had a question for Jordan. They want

46:12

your take on the war. Uh, everything

46:14

else is noise until that gets resolved

46:16

according to Lethar.

46:20

>> Yeah, I mean, I'm not a war analyst, so

46:22

I don't really know what's going to

46:23

happen. Um,

46:24

>> you're kind of an everything analyst.

46:25

You're a big picture analyst. happened

46:27

is a severe disruption in oil um flow

46:30

from the straight of Hormuz. Um and so

46:34

my only real opinion is that I don't

46:36

think that's going to resolve anytime

46:38

soon. And even if it were to resolve

46:40

today, I think damage is done. Um and so

46:44

my only trade in the whole thing is uh

46:47

got a little long USO, but um you I

46:50

could be I could be wrong. Who knows,

46:52

>> dude? What's going on with the market?

46:54

Yeah, I was do do we have any uh comment

46:56

on the current state of the market

46:58

because it is not looking good.

47:03

>> Wow. Okay, here we go. I I did not

47:06

>> I'm surprised that anyone's even

47:07

watching us. Normally when the market

47:08

crashes, uh everyone just looks at their

47:11

own portfolio.

47:12

>> I am so pissed off right now because I

47:16

bought so many puts over the weekend,

47:19

but they expired yesterday

47:21

>> and I and I exited them. I basically

47:23

lost all that money uh yesterday

47:25

morning. I I just was I wanted to be

47:27

prepared for this. I did protect my uh

47:30

the bulk of my Amazon position

47:32

fortunately. Um so at least that is

47:37

somewhat protected here

47:42

uh through the end of the week. I I was

47:44

nervous about Amazon through the end of

47:46

the week with this

47:47

>> with the world though. Somebody did

47:48

mention in the comments a little earlier

47:50

that um

47:52

uh a helicop like a US helicopter was

47:55

shot down in the straight

47:56

>> that was that was uh overnight or

47:58

yesterday. I saw that in the news this

47:59

morning.

47:59

>> Yeah, I didn't even know about that. I

48:01

have had my head in the sand. Uh no one

48:03

wants to respond over it. Um look, I

48:06

mean this this is the kind of stuff that

48:07

just keeps this thing going on for uh

48:10

indefinitely, right? So this is

48:13

generally good news for investors if

48:16

you're not overleveraged. You you want

48:18

the market to drop on stuff like this,

48:21

right? We we've said this time and time

48:23

again. We all have stocks that we love.

48:25

We all have sectors we love. We have

48:27

things that we have absolute confidence

48:29

in. Whether it's Amazon, whether it's

48:31

Nvidia,

48:32

uh Micron, the AI infrastructure trade

48:36

generally, we have tremendous visibility

48:39

into how AI is going to play out. I

48:41

think at least over the next 12 to 18

48:43

months with spend levels. The one

48:46

concern is that people are borrowing too

48:47

much money to spend with infrastructure.

48:50

But those infrastructure trades in my

48:53

eyes are pretty solid and I would love

48:57

to see them drop and open up some

48:59

opportunities so we can all get deeper

49:01

into our favorite AI infrastructure

49:04

trades. So, I love stuff like this. It's

49:07

painful to see your account get crushed

49:10

in the short run.

49:10

>> Uh, no. Tell me about it. I

49:13

>> But, but the war won't go on, I hope,

49:15

forever, right? Like, at some point, I

49:19

think

49:19

>> Well, I mean, I don't think the war will

49:20

go on, but it's not like um let's say

49:23

that the war stops today. Everybody

49:25

stops firing. What What then? So, Iran's

49:29

not just going to open the straight and

49:31

be like, "Oh, everything's fine." Um,

49:34

right. So, does it even matter if the if

49:37

the war keeps going on or not?

49:39

>> Why would they not open up the straight?

49:41

>> Why would they open up the straight?

49:42

They know that it's hurting.

49:43

>> They know that it's hurting us and it's

49:46

it's liberal for them to get what they

49:47

want.

49:48

>> The war won't end unless the straight

49:51

there's an agreement to open up the

49:53

straight.

49:53

>> But why would they open it up unless

49:55

they unless the United States starts

49:57

conceding

49:58

uh certain things uh monetary repar all

50:01

sorts of things, right? because they

50:02

know that the United States isn't going

50:03

to do a military uh campaign. Um all we

50:07

can do is strategic strikes.

50:10

>> So the longer they can hurt us

50:11

financially, the longer straight close.

50:15

>> I just know the fin the incentives on

50:18

our end are to end this before the

50:20

midterms. That's all I know. Period. So

50:22

I don't know if that's happening in two

50:24

weeks or in in two months, but there are

50:28

some pretty heavy incentives. And you

50:30

know I when it comes to macro stuff I

50:33

always invest where the incentives lie.

50:34

The incentives almost always maybe

50:37

always play out. Always.

50:40

>> Yeah. The incentive for us is for it to

50:42

open up but the incentive for Iran is to

50:44

let the pain continue.

50:47

>> I think Iran will

50:50

listen they they want something right.

50:51

So

50:52

>> yeah they want something they've listed

50:54

their demands. Um

50:57

>> totally unseasonable. So Jordan, are you

51:00

saying that you see a scenario where

51:04

this goes through the midterms because

51:06

they're not going to agree to anything

51:08

we will offer them and therefore

51:10

>> No, I'm I have no So, first of all, no,

51:12

I have no idea how long it'll go on. I'm

51:15

just saying damage already done, right?

51:17

Um, even if you open up the straight

51:19

today,

51:21

um, which

51:21

>> I don't care

51:22

>> that what

51:23

>> I don't care about damage already done

51:25

because we're in the middle of the

51:26

biggest super cycle in of human history.

51:30

So, we'll overcome.

51:32

>> I just don't think you realize I just

51:33

don't think then you're educated to the

51:35

impact that it's had on oil supplies

51:37

across the world.

51:39

>> I'm not sure you're educated to the

51:41

impact that the AI super cycle is going

51:43

to have over the next two decades. And

51:44

the market is forward thinking. So even

51:46

if we have tremendous pain over the next

51:48

two years, 3 years, the market will

51:51

think 5 years out, 8 years out, nine

51:53

years out. I I just think this is more

51:56

important

51:57

than that. So I mean, yeah, I mean,

52:01

>> well, if it if it's that important, I I

52:03

don't see us uh taking steps that

52:06

reflect that.

52:08

>> You're right. You're right. And I don't

52:10

know what the hell's going on behind the

52:12

scenes. this administration. It's I

52:14

can't even imagine. Is anything

52:16

[clears throat] even happening? I don't

52:18

know. I just know at some point at some

52:20

point someone has to be having a real

52:24

conversation with someone who can make a

52:26

decision over there. And I would have to

52:29

imagine that we might get close to a

52:32

deal at some. I don't know how the hell

52:34

it's going to happen. I I'm with you,

52:35

Jordan. I do not have a clue

52:38

actually happens. We don't even know if

52:40

we're talking to the right people.

52:42

>> But it [laughter] has to happen. This is

52:43

the craziest I've seen in my life,

52:45

guys. I The last four months of these

52:48

[laughter]

52:49

the war ending 10 times. Every weekend

52:52

we have a deal on Sunday night or like

52:55

Monday morning.

52:57

>> That's the thing is there's no deal,

52:58

right? It's all it's all made up. Like

53:00

[laughter] there's no truth behind those

53:02

claims from what I've seen.

53:04

>> I could be wrong again. I'm not going to

53:06

be wrong about that, but it just seems

53:07

like there's actually no deal.

53:09

>> The main strategy is just promise that

53:11

the war is going to end and keep

53:12

>> just have an AIOS report that makes a

53:14

claim and then the market goes up,

53:15

right? Um,

53:18

it's crazy, dude. It's like it's it's

53:21

every week, dude. And it just never

53:25

ends. It just literally never ends. I've

53:28

never seen anything like this before.

53:29

We're going to have a 5day pause and

53:31

then we're going to have a two week

53:32

pause and then we're going to have a one

53:33

month pause. Yeah. And we're having a

53:35

pause and then Iran starts shooting

53:37

missiles at Israel and

53:38

>> Well, and the pause doesn't even mean

53:39

anything. Yeah. Both sides are still

53:41

both sides are still like combative

53:44

during the pause. Like nothing makes

53:47

sense. That's what we just Nothing

53:49

matters. Nothing makes sense. That's my

53:52

new slogan.

53:53

>> You know what?

53:55

By the way, it's summertime. I just

53:57

wrote because my kids are out of school

53:59

and I just don't want to think about

54:02

this stuff every day. That's I think

54:04

that's the main thing. I just really

54:06

don't. We have been trading so

54:09

aggressively throughout the entire

54:11

course of the last year since last fall.

54:13

The AI trade that just never ends. All

54:17

of the the roller coaster ride that

54:19

we've been on with Amazon.

54:21

Oh dude. I just need a goddamn

54:24

break. Need a break from the Iran war. I

54:28

need a break from

54:29

>> Tik Tok or a real or something where it

54:31

was it was a dude who basically was

54:33

saying why do I even I don't even want

54:36

to know what the straight of Hormuz is

54:37

and the fact that I've heard of that is

54:40

a problem. The fact that I know that

54:42

those words is a problem.

54:44

>> I know man. I'm not I'm not on my game.

54:47

Uh Jordan

54:50

uh you know how we're opening up that

54:52

podcast studio in Austin? Yeah. mainly

54:55

for women's uh podcast shows that we're

54:57

going to develop and launch. We're doing

55:00

a spin-off show of Dumb Money that we'll

55:02

tell you about after we we end this

55:04

episode and we're recording in studio.

55:08

None of this none of this

55:10

>> is sitting together in a room.

55:12

>> Not a live show either. Not a live show

55:15

either. And so you might need to go to

55:16

Austin once a week starting in November.

55:20

>> Uh or or as often as you can.

55:22

>> Are we gonna say what it is? Are we

55:24

going to

55:24

>> No, I don't think we can do it. No, we

55:26

have to

55:26

>> because I've got a good I've got a good

55:28

example that we could on right now and

55:30

do a practice episode.

55:32

>> No. No. I want to make sure the IP

55:35

behind the brand and all the stuff is

55:38

set before we start talking about it.

55:39

And I don't want to like tease it

55:41

because we have so much work to do. I'm

55:43

so excited.

55:45

This is the most excited I have been

55:50

in 20 years about doing something

55:53

because I'm more excited about this new

55:55

show than the existing dumb money we

55:57

have today that we talk about. Don't get

55:58

me wrong, I love talking about what we

56:00

talk about. But

56:03

this is going to be so much better. I

56:06

[snorts] think I really do. You're going

56:08

to be pumped, Jordan.

56:09

>> Yeah, you'll like it.

56:10

>> You'll like it for sure. Jordan's gonna

56:12

like it a lot. We'll

56:13

>> find out.

56:13

>> I don't know.

56:15

No, he'll like it.

56:16

>> There's not a lot of fundamentals.

56:19

[laughter]

56:20

>> There's no fundamental. There could be

56:22

fundamentals.

56:23

>> Maybe find some.

56:26

>> Um,

56:27

>> it's going to be good. We're going to

56:28

get back together in person. We're going

56:30

to get to see each other again. We could

56:32

even like combine like barbecue lunches

56:34

after the show like we used to back in

56:36

the late 201

56:39

back to that um to that soup dumpling

56:42

place in Austin. That place was awesome,

56:43

>> dude. But think about how much barbecue

56:45

there is in Austin. You could eat, too,

56:47

dude.

56:48

>> We're back.

56:49

>> We're back, baby.

56:51

>> All right. All right. Let's Let's end

56:52

this. Sorry, guys. We're all over the

56:54

place. But SpaceX, I don't I don't know,

56:56

man. I just don't know. Get Get

57:01

>> the conclusion of today's episode is

57:03

SpaceX. I just don't know, man.

57:05

>> But at least we're honest. At least

57:07

we're honest. We just don't know. Okay.

57:12

Just don't know. All right, that's

57:13

that's a perfect way to end it. All

57:15

right, we're done, money. Thanks for

57:17

[music]

57:24

[music]

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.