What Is The Image Of God? - Dr. Michael Heiser
The image of God is not an internal quality or attribute like consciousness or a soul; rather, it is a functional role of acting as God's proxy, representative, and imager on earth, designed to coexist with His supernatural family.
Understanding the image of God as a functional role (imaging) establishes the ontological value of every human being, regardless of development or ability, and grounds our missional identity in God's original cosmic plan.
Section summaries
Introduction & Critique of the Trinitarian Reading of Gen 1:26
watchEstablishes the linguistic and theological problem of the plurals in Genesis.
The Divine Council Context
watchCrucial for understanding Heiser's worldview of the spiritual realm and the heavenly family.
Critique of Attribute-Based Views of the Image
watchProvides a devastating critique of standard theological definitions using linguistic evidence and ethical case studies.
The Hebrew Grammar of 'In the Image'
watchExplains the 'bet' of predication and how it changes the noun 'image' into a functional role.
Bearing the Name (Nasa Shem)
watchConnects Genesis imaging with the Decalogue's command on taking the Lord's name in vain.
Christ as the Perfect Image & Discipleship
optionalApplies the imaging concept to Christology and New Testament sanctification.
Two Families of God & Cosmic Eden
watchIntegrates biblical theology, patristics, and Second Temple themes of heaven and earth joining in Eden.
The Problem of Evil, Free Will, and the Family
optionalExplores theodicy, communicable attributes, and practical ecclesiology.
Key points
- The Plurality of Genesis 1:26 Refers to the Heavenly Host — The 'us' and 'our' in 'let us make man in our image' does not refer to the Trinity—since co-equal, omniscient persons do not need to consult one another—but to God addressing His pre-existing heavenly council, planning a new earthly family.
- The Image of God is an Office or Function, Not an Attribute — Defining the 'imago Dei' using attributes like intelligence, consciousness, or possessing a soul (nephesh, which animals also have) fails because these are not possessed equally by all humans (e.g., those in comas or zygotes) and are not completely unique to humanity. In Hebrew grammar, 'in the image' uses the 'b' preposition of predication, meaning to operate 'as' God's representative or proxy.
- Bearing the Name and Imaging are Identical Roles — The commandment 'Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain' uses the Hebrew verb 'nasa' (to bear or carry). It is not about verbal swearing, but about carrying the status and reputation of God as His active representative in the world.
- Divine Foreknowledge Does Not Equal Predestination — Using the narrative of David at Keilah (1 Samuel 23), where God accurately foreknew that the men of Keilah would surrender David if Saul besieged them (which never actually happened because David left), Heiser demonstrates that God foreknows possibilities that never materialize.
“To be human is to be the image of God. It doesn't matter if you're a few cells in a woman's womb. It doesn't matter if you're old and you've lost your memory. It doesn't matter if you're in a coma. If you are human, you are God's imager. End of story.” — Dr. Michael Heiser
“God foreknew things that never happened. Saul does not get to the city and the men do not hand David over because David ain't there. Foreknowledge does not necessitate predestination.” — Dr. Michael Heiser
AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.
email. Have you ever noticed there's
some strange things in this passage?
If you haven't, maybe you will now cuz I
changed the colors of some of the words.
Isn't that clever? Um,
let us
make humankind in our image. You have
plurals. And then in the next verse, it
switches back to singulars.
Is the writer confused?
Did he just flunk grammar?
Now, I would suggest to you there's a
point to doing that. We want to talk
about that.
There's lots of debate on the nature of
the image. There's lots of debate on the
plurals. The switch you you almost never
hear commented on, but we're going to go
through all of them. Most Christians are
taught that the us in the verse is the
trinity.
There are a number of reasons and I go
through all of them in unseen realm why
that is a flawed idea. I'll just give
you one.
The trinity in any standard formulation
or articulation of the doctrine. You
have three co-equal
co-eternal
co-omnicient persons. They don't need
information.
So when God says, "Hey, let's make human
the other person in the trinity stop.
I'm already there."
And and he can't say, "I thought of that
before you did because they're
co-eternal."
Okay. So why do we even need the
conversation?
Because we're not dealing with the
Trinity.
Okay. God
is speaking to his heavenly host, the
family that already exists. And he says,
"I got a great idea.
Let's create
beings who are like us
on the earth.
Let's like take, you know, we got this
neat family here and I love it. Love you
guys."
And I'd like to do it again on this
time. They're going to be a little weird
because they're gonna have bodies.
That's a little strange, you know,
little restricted. Some limitations
there. But but let's do that.
Now,
we know and I'll I'll probably click out
to a little bit later that because it
switches back to the singular, when God
does create humanity, he is the lone
creator.
>> There are no other creators. But the
plural is still there for a reason and
we'll talk about that.
I want to take a bit of a rabbit trail
though and talk about what the image is
because this is something that you know
Stovall and I have had a number of
conversations about. This is really
important
and it's something that if we get a
grasp of this, it will inform our
identity and not just our individual
identity, but our collective identity in
ways that might seem to the ear obvious,
but in our culture are anything but
obvious.
The image of God
has these characteristics in scripture.
Male and female possess it equally.
It makes us distinct from all other
earthly creatures. There's no hint in
the text that we get it in stages
incrementally or partially. You either
have it or you don't.
There's no like growth and development
into the image in a human sense here in
the creation. And it's passed on
generationally. When Adam and Eve have
children in Genesis 5,
their children are said to be in the
image, you know,
of their father, the image of of of
Adam, his own image. In Genesis 9, that
language is applied to every human
being. Whosoever sheds man's blood, by
man shall his blood be shed. For in the
image of God, he made man. He made
humanity. And that's long after Adam and
Eve. You've got lots and lots of people
on the earth by the time that that
statement is made. They are all images
of God. I said imagers.
What do you mean, Mike? That's kind of
an awkward term. It's actually
important.
Now,
I'm going to put that up. Little rabbit
trail here, a little story. I used to
teach Christian ethics at a uh I did it
at a Bible college and at a Christian
college which happened to be a Catholic
school in Wisconsin.
And I loved abortion day.
This gives you a little insight into my
personality.
Say, well, how in the world could you
love abortion day? because I knew I
would get to torment students on that
day like I don't get to torment them on
any other day.
So what I would do is I'd go in and I'd
say, "Hey, it's abortion day today.
We're going to talk about abortion,
Christian ethics.
How many of you," and again, these are
Christian schools. So I'd say, "How many
of you are pro-life?" Like, you know,
like every hand goes up, you know, which
of course is predictable. And I would
say, "Why?"
And they would, you know, they'd look at
you again like you got two heads.
You know, we're Christians. And, you
know, they'd go back and forth and
eventually somebody would say, "Well,
life is sacred." And I'd say, "Why?"
And then somebody would wind up in
Genesis 1:26 and they'd say, "Well,
because humanity is made in the image of
God." And I would say, "Well, what does
that mean?"
And then I would get the grocery list.
See, that's what I'm waiting for is the
grocery list. If you read a lot of your
theologians, what I'm what what I'm
going to tell you is my view is not a
new view. It's, you know, again, Mike
never had an original idea, but there
are good exeetical reasons for it. But
this is the grocery list. They would say
things like, well, consciousness,
self-awareness, sensience, the ability
to pray, the ability to commune with
God, emotions, having a soul or a
spirit. You know, theologians land
somewhere in here.
And I would say,
well, thank you for making a biblical
pro-choice argument for me. And then
they'd really look at you
and they're like, what? What? What do
you mean? They'd be like my pug. Like
what? Okay. Why do these things fail?
Because they cannot be said to be
present equally among all human beings.
You go back to the list. Is everybody
does everybody have the same level of
intelligence,
emotional aptitude?
Is is everybody's conscious conscious
conscience the same? What about people
in a coma? Do they lose the image?
They're no longer conscience.
I mean, you can just go down. You you
can pick off every one of these. If we
even expand it to the animal kingdom,
there's a whole field in psychology
called animal cognition,
which is actually fun to read. It's it's
something I'm interested in. Not because
I have pugs
there. I don't know where pugs rank on
this, but I I remember reading a study
one time where chickens scored better
than toddlers on an intelligence test
because and we have a we have a chicken
at home. Why do we have a chicken? I
don't know. Okay. But if you let the
chicken out,
it it it it knows at night to go roost
somewhere, you know, where it's safe.
Like it'll it'll go back home. You want
to do that with your toddler?
Okay, that was the test. So animal
intelligent, I mean, you you none of
these work. They're not possessed
equally among all humans. They're not
they can't be said to be actually
present among all humans at different
stages of human development. And some
aren't even unique to to mankind. All
these are connected to brain function
except for soul and spirit. We'll get to
that in a moment. But you see what I
mean? The little, you know, four
sixselled zygote, the thing that
attaches itself to the wall of the
uterus, that ain't praying to God.
That's not having a single thought. It
doesn't have a brain.
It's not communing with the the with the
supernatural, with the almighty. And
then they somebody in the audience in my
ethics class would say, "Well, it will."
I said, "Thank you. Now we have
potential persons."
That's a pro-choice argument.
And then you'd get, "I'm going to tell
my pastor.
I'm gonna I'm gonna after this class,
I'm going to call my mom. I'm going to
go to the dean." And I'm just like,
look, they they know what day it is.
They're expecting you, you know, just
okay, just go ahead.
This is every semester,
okay? They get it. And I would tell
them, look, I'm doing this to you
because I don't want someone who is
hostile to your faith to do it to you
>> because they will destroy you.
Okay? It it would take it would take
five minutes
to destroy you
and some would enjoy it.
I mean, these ideas make you vulnerable.
What about soul and spirit? Well, the
Hebrew word for soul is nephesh. Guess
what? Animals have that in Genesis 2:7.
So, that's not unique to humans.
Genesis 1:21, another verse. Animals
have that. Every living creature,
nephesha,
living creature. See, it's obscured in
your English translations. You don't
know that's the word for soul, but it
is.
They also have a ruach, the word for
spirit. Ecclesiastes 3:21, it just
refers to animate life. There's animate
life and then there's like plant life.
Okay,
man. What about the nishmatim, the
breath of life? Well, that's nice.
Genesis 7:22 and 23 attributes that all
land animals as well.
Again, it would take five minutes.
So, what is Okay, you know, inevitably
I'd get, okay, smart guy, what is it?
You know, they get they'd get angry
and I'd say, I'm glad you asked the
question
because it's important.
So God created man in his own image is
how most translations
have this. I'm going to suggest that we
need to think of the image as a function
or role rather than a quality or
attribute
inside a person because those qualities
and attributes are not unique. Humans
don't possess them equally and in some
cases they can be perceived as being
even lost again like the coma situation.
The image is something
that's a function. Let me let me
illustrate in English.
If I say
in, believe it or not, this this is
really about a single that little
preposition in in Hebrew, it's b the
letter betm
in the image. Okay? If I say put the
dishes in the sink, the word in denotes
what?
Location. It's in the sink.
If I say I wrote the letter in pencil.
Now, I'm not talking about location. I'm
not using that little preposition to
denote location. I'm talking about the
instrument I used to do some writing.
the tool has a totally different
semantic, totally different meaning. If
I say I broke the vase in pieces,
I'm not talking about instrument now or
location. I'm talking about some result
of some action that I did.
Okay, try this one. If I say I work in
medicine,
I work in ministry. I work in
accounting. I work in education. What do
I mean?
Means I work as
a doctor, a PA, a nurse. I work as a
pastor,
you know, somebody, you know, a staff
person, some ministerial function of any
kind, any type. I work as an accountant.
I work as a principal, a teacher, an
administrator, whatever. It describes
function
or role.
That is what Genesis 1:26 is getting at.
Now I can take you into the Hebrew
grammar and talk about the bet of you
predication, the bet essentia and all
that fancy Latin grammar stuff.
This is a known category for the meaning
of in function. How does it work out
practically? Try to think of it as a
verb rather than a noun.
Every human being is an imager of God.
God's original intent was to create
creatures like him to essentially be him
as if he were there. They are his proxy.
They are his representative, his agent
to do things.
Every human being is an imager of God.
Another way to illustrate this is to go
to one of the ten commandments.
This is a familiar one. You shall not
take the name of the Lord your God in
vain. For the Lord will not hold him
guiltless who takes his name in vain.
Now we are sort of taught to think that
this commandment is about swearing. You
know the the the verbal
utterance of God's name in some
defamatory or you know useless way.
I want you to see something again that's
obscured in English.
take
is the Hebrew verb nasa. And I'm going
to do
just bear with me here. I'm going to run
a quick search just to show you a point.
This is often the term you'll look at
the options over here that is translated
to bear, to carry, to support, to lift.
Okay? It's a verb that means all those
things. Lift, carry, take, take up, pick
up, that sort of thing. to bear.
Thou shalt not bear the name of the Lord
thy God in vain. What does it mean to
bear a name?
It means to be associated with it.
I bear the name Christian. I bear the
name, you know, like Logos employee.
I am an extension
of that name.
I'm responsible for its reputation.
>> Okay? To bear the name means to be a
representative of that name. Then the
New Testament expresses this really
nicely when Paul tells Peter, "Let
everyone who names the name of Christ
depart from iniquity."
Imaging
God
and bearing the name are two related
concepts. It's really two ways of saying
the same thing. Humanity was the
representative of God, was the agent of
God on on earth. To be human is to be
the image of God. It doesn't matter if
you're a few cells in a woman's womb. It
doesn't matter if you're old and you've
lost your memory. It doesn't matter if
you're in a coma. You if you are human,
you are God's imager.
End of story. It doesn't matter what
race,
what income level. I mean, look at all
the ways our our culture divides people
up into groups. I mean, we live we live
in a day when the best word for it is
tribalism.
It's like we all want to be in in these
little tribes and then they fight with
each other constantly.
You know that is that is so chaotically
contrary to God's vision for humanity
and the fact that God actually tells you
how he looks at people.
Every person God looks at as his
representation.
They are they are him as it were on
earth. Now that gets ruined by the fall.
We enter into rebellion.
We have the problem of sin.
We are all in rebellion and we need to
be brought back into the family of God
where we can actually function like God
wants us to do. When we can actually
represent him well, the way he wants
things done. But every person you bump
into
is a potential candidate. Not not
candid. It's not a really a good word,
but every person you bump into is an
aranged family member
who was created for a specific reason
and that is to image God, to participate
with God, to complete the tasks God
wants, to give the earth the kind of
life God wants people to have.
It all goes back to Genesis 1 to this
concept of imaging
bearing the name representation. Again,
in a fallen world, the redeemed are the
ones who can do this as intended and
we're all estranged from God.
Thankfully, we have a template. It's no
coincidence that imaging language is
used of Jesus.
Again, it's not like a lucky a lucky
correlation.
Oh, Paul got lucky. He used the word
image a few times. You know, I bet he
wasn't thinking about Genesis 1. I bet
he was.
I bet he was thinking about
representation of God. The God of this
world has blinded the minds of the
unbelievers to keep them from seeing the
light of the gospel, the glory of
Christ, who is the image of God. He's
the perfect image. He is the perfect
representative.
If you've seen me, Jesus said, you have
seen the father.
God has predestinated that all who
believe will ultimately be conformed to
the image of his son. Does that mean we
all look like Jesus? Be kind of sad if
you're a woman. You know, it's just
like, you know, I like the way I look.
You know, we again, look at how we think
of this stuff. I'll be at my ideal
weight. I'll have more hair. You know,
can can we like not literalize
everything so often? I mean, there's
just bigger stuff going on. You know, in
1 John 3, 1 John 3, it says, "Behold
what manner of love the father has
bestowed upon us that we should be
called and we should be the children of
God." And then John has this little, you
look it up. He has this little
parenthetical thought where he says,
"And that's what we are." And then he
goes on and says, you know, someday we
will be like him.
We will be conformed to his image.
believers have put on the new self which
is being renewed in knowledge after the
image of its creator.
What a coincidence.
We all with unveiled face beholding the
glory of the Lord are being transformed
into the same image from one degree of
glory to another. To image God is to
become more like him. To use Jesus as
your example.
You follow Jesus. You imitate Jesus.
Folks, this is disciplehip, which is
something that's basically lost in the
modern church. Okay? This is
disciplehip. You be you you follow
Jesus. You mimic him. You know, his
behavior, his attitudes, what you know
what he would do. And he he gives us
plenty of examples. And when you do
that, you are being conformed to his
image. And he is the perfect image of
God. You are fulfilling your role. This
is what you were intended to be. It's
what every person was intended to be.
All in the same family again, all
participating with God in making the
world the way God wanted it to be in the
first place.
That's the task. And we've quoted 2
Timothy 2:19 already. So, what about the
plurals? Again, I don't think this is a
conundrum. Let's start with what's
clear. God is the lone creator of all
things in heaven and earth, visible and
invisible, earthly world, spiritual
world. Colossians 1 tells us that we
image God our creator. That is we serve,
we partner with him as his agents, his
representatives, his proxies in our
sphere which is this world. They do the
same thing in their world. They have the
same father, the same creator.
The reason it's plural is because it
loops them into the conversation. His
supernatural children, the members of
his host, the council, whatever again
metaphor you you want. They image God,
their creator in the spiritual realm. We
are to be mirror images. Pardon the pun.
It's deliberate in this case. We are
mirror images of each other. As in
heaven,
so on earth.
Okay,
it's, you know, our father who art in
heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy
kingdom come, thy will be done on earth
as it is in heaven.
God has two families in Eden because
heaven came to earth. You realize again
that's what Eden is. This is where
heaven comes to earth. God dwells among
men. He creates a human family to
coexist
and co-partner with the supernatural
family that already exists where God is
his family. His entourage is with them.
He has a conversation with them. It's
not the only time when he says, "Hey,
let us do this or that." God has
conversations with the members of the
host in other places in Genesis
in Eden.
They're there. We're there. God's
original plan was to have these two
families together. You realize what that
means? It means humanity was created to
be fit
for God's presence.
That's the original plan.
They're not barred from entry.
They belong there. The most normal thing
in God's mind is for humans to be with
him
>> because his other children are with him.
He didn't create them to be separate. He
created them to be one. This is why at
the end of the road in sanctification,
get a long, you know, fancy theological
term for when we're glorified after
death or after the Lord comes,
we become like him, like Jesus. We don't
we don't merely become like angels. And
we learn why in Hebrews 2. Because the
second person of the Godhead became a
man to redeem man. So we are actually
made like him. A little little bit above
them. A little bit above the angels, you
know.
>> But we are we are there together
in the new earth. You realize the Bible
ends in Revelation the way it began in
Genesis. It's just a new Eden and now
it's global. But everybody who's there
belongs there.
It's the most normal thing to think in
God's mind.
The most abnormal thing for God to think
is that his family is estranged from
him. Both his supernatural family
members rebel and his human family
members rebel.
They turn their backs on the things God
wants them to have because they want
autonomy.
They want control.
They want self-ruule.
They want it so badly that they're
willing to throw away all that they have
to think they're in control of their own
lives, their own situations.
They make their own autonomous
decisions.
That's abnormal for, you know, in God's
mind. That's what he doesn't want.
Again, the plurals co-representation is
the key idea. Let's talk a little bit
about rebellion and evil.
Now, when whenever I jump into this, the
question naturally comes up. Well,
didn't God know what that was going to
happen?
Of course, God knew that was going to
happen.
He's an omnisient being.
Of course, he knows what's going to
happen.
Well,
you know, then why did he do it? Why did
why did he make us? It's it's it's a
related question is why is there evil?
Can't God just get rid of evil? If he
doesn't get rid of evil, he can't be
good. You know why God doesn't get rid
of evil?
How many of you are XFiles fans? This is
going to date me a little bit. Okay.
There's this wonderful episode in the
XFiles
where Moulder and Scully find a genie,
you know, rolled up in the carpet. Okay.
And Moulder figures out this is a genie
like like an Aladdin.
And so the genie says, "Well,
congratulations, Num Skull. You get
three wishes." Okay. And so his first
wish, it's it's the it's the, you know,
caricature wish. I want world peace.
And then Moulder goes outside of the
room that they're in and everybody's
gone.
And he and he's he's running down the
street. Scully, Scully, surely Scully's
here. You know, it's like, nope.
Got any more wishes?
You know, so it's a good illustration.
Yes, God could wipe out evil like that,
but to do it, he has to wipe out all the
beings he has made who are like him.
Because when we're created as God's
images and when they were created as
God's images, you know, they're co-ers
just in different realms,
they are his representatives. Well, to
do the job of sort of being God, being a
partner with God, to do that job, God
shared his attributes with us. In
theology, they're called communicable
attributes. That's your impressive
theological term for the day. Okay?
There are attributes God shares.
Creativity, intelligence, rationality,
emotions, and freedom.
Free will. You can't eliminate that one
and keep the rest of them because then
you wouldn't really be like God, would
you?
>> Free will is actually essential to
imaging to the whole concept.
Now, God knew that. You know what?
I still think this is a really good idea
because it's what I want. I see the end
goal. I want a a human family, an
earthly family with my supernatural
family.
I want them together. I want to enjoy
them part partnering with me in their
realm like I enjoy you partnering with
me in the supernatural realm. I want a
family. It's it's the natural impulse of
God to want a family
and to want partners.
But I know
that when I make them as my images
and I share my attributes,
I also am aware of one other thing.
They're not me.
They're like me, but they're not me.
That means they lack my perfect nature.
That means at some point
they're going to abuse the good gifts
that I've given them.
And God's right. Rebellion happens in
the supernatural realm and it happens in
the earthly realm. Now, what does it
tell you about God, though? You say,
"Well, that's not very satisfying
because because look at all the misery.
Look at all the the violence. Look at
all the bad stuff in the earth, you
know, and we look at all the suffering.
Since we know that wasn't what God
intended, God hates it, too.
But here's the here's the key point.
In God's mind, and you can blame God for
this decision if you like.
In God's mind,
the terrible things that would result
from his initial decision to make us
was better than not having us at all.
>> You know, at the end of the day, God
makes that call. Now, you can sit there
and be the proud atheist and say, "Well,
I would rather not exist."
Yeah.
Well, then why don't you just go out
and, you know, jump off a bridge then?
You know, show us the the commitment to
your own statement. You know, here's a
truck coming by. Let's have it. Okay.
They're lying to you.
>> They're just trying to win a debate.
>> Okay. We And we have to have, you know,
we want life. Life is a is is a
wonderful thing. And even with
suffering, I mean, some of the people
who suffer the most will tell you that
life is a wonderful thing because they
they kind of know, you know, from one
end to the other.
And you know, we have to come to grips
with suffering. That's why we were
created to be family, to be community,
to alleviate the suffering of family
members, to alleviate the suffering of
other images of God. If you looked at
people this way,
you might actually, you know, get off
your butt and do something. Okay? You
know, let's be honest. I I often compare
or and you all know the difference here.
And again, I'm I'm going to I'm going to
be critical of just church in general.
Uh again, not every not every place I've
been in church, you know, it hasn't been
this experience, but I've seen it. A lot
of churches tend to treat people and
even a lot of small groups, a lot of
Christians tend to treat the collective
like it's a business
instead of a family.
>> You know, you would think differently if
you had some person in church come up to
you and say, you know, I can't pay my
rent this month. I don't know what I'm
going to do.
If that was your brother, you'd know
what to do.
>> Okay? If that was your sister, you
wouldn't even have to think twice about
it.
It's it's it's a whole different mental
dynamic.
Okay, that that is how God looks at us.
That's the kind of thing God has as an
expectation if we will get it into our
heads again. If we would if we would
think of ourselves the way God thinks of
us, okay, as as humans and especially
within the church because we're no
longer estranged, we are redeemed. We
were brought back into the family. We
have the Holy Spirit to assist us. We
have other people who are like-minded.
This should be the most normal thing in
the world. And you know, if it actually
happened and when it happens, because it
does happen, if it actually happened
with frequency, do you think people
would notice?
>> Of course they notice because it's
abnormal.
Okay. It's not the norm.
It gives you a little taste of what life
should be like
again in in God's world. It all goes
back to this imaging concept. And yes,
there's evil and there's suffering. But
again, God was willing to be grieved
himself.
You think you're you're you're grieved
about suffering because of the stuff you
see in the world. God sees everything.
Okay? You don't have anything up on God.
You don't have a greater awareness of
the of the misery and the suffering of
the world than than God does. He is
fully aware.
This is why scripture God hates evil. It
grieves him.
Now, did he know it was going to happen?
Yeah, he did. But that was preferable
than never having us at all.
Yeah. It's that that is is just God's
nature. Now God is actively
trying working with people through
people to be his agents again and and
it's the redeem that can function in
this way the way that that it was all
intended to work. God is actively
engaged with people
to bring estranged imagers back into the
family. We call that evangelism. Okay?
giving them the gospel and then building
a community where suffering is
alleviated. It's never going to be
totally removed because that's the age
to come. But in this age, we have to try
to address it.
Again, this is what God wants.
Now, the the question that goes with
this is, you know, you inevitably wind
up in this predestination, you know,
conversation. Let me just click out to a
verse because I think this one's really
important, too. Yeah, God knew what was
going to happen. Well, well, then if he
forneew it, he then he this is what God
wants. He predestinated it. He wants
suffering. He's corrupt. He's evil. You
know, he's this, that, and the other
thing. Well, really, I think you're
making some assumptions there.
And I love to go to this passage. It's
not the only one of its kind, but I
think it's the clearest.
This is David at Kyla. And you say,
"Good grief, I know who David is, but
you know, Kylo, I'm probably gonna
forget that name." It's okay. Just
remember the story.
David is fleeing from Saul like he does
most of the time, okay? Until he becomes
king. Just read through the passage. Now
they told David, you know, somebody
tells David, "Behold,
the Philistines, who I like to
characterize as the Klingons of the Old
Testament,
the Philistines are fighting against
Kyla
and are robbing the the threshing
floors. That's where they store food.
That's that's bad because people like to
eat. At least I do." Therefore, David
inquired of the Lord, "Should I go up
and attack these Philistines?"
And the Lord said to David, "Go and
attack the Philistines and save Kila."
But David's men said to him, "Behold,
we're afraid here in Judah." I mean, how
much more than if we go to Kila against
the armies of the Philistines. So,
they're safe in Judah. They're holed up.
You know, that's they're they're away
from Saul's gang. You know, they're a
small group. Saul has a whole army. If
they leave this the relative safety of
where they're at and they go up to the
Philistines and they're kind of exposed.
Plus, it's the Philistines. They're just
nasty.
So David says, 'Well, let me go ask God
again.' David inquired of the Lord
again. And the Lord answered him,"Get
up.
Arise, go down to Kila, for I will give
the Philistines into your hand."
Translation, "Just tell your men not to
worry." Okay. David and his men went to
Kyla and fought with the Philistines and
brought away their livestock and struck
them with a great blow. So David saved
the inhabitants of Kyla. David's the
hero. He saves the city. When Abiar the
son of Aimilec had fled to David to
Kila. So this is another character in
the bigger story of David. He hears that
David's, you know, going to Kyla. So he
wants to go down and talk, you know,
talk there. He had come down with an
ephod in his hand. This is probably part
of the breastplate of the high priest.
Again, this is after the Mosaic era,
but it's it's the thing one of the
things that God had told them to use to
ask questions of God, to inquire of God.
So, the the priest comes down. It was
told Saul that David had come to Kila.
So, not only does Aimilec hear, but Saul
hears that David is in Kila. We don't
know how he heard, but he gets wind of
this. And Saul's like, "Oh, this is
awesome."
Saul said, 'God has given him into my
hand, for he has shut himself in by
entering a town that has gates and bars.
That David is a
Okay, why is that a big deal? Because
David's inside the city. It has gates
and bars. You know what Saul's going to
do? This is siege warfare.
You just take your men down there and
you surround the city. And then you
wait.
You cut off food going in. You cut off
water going in. and you just wait and
you say, "The people in your city will
get to eat and drink
when we get David.
Hand him over and we're out of here.
Life goes back to normal."
So Saul's like, "This idiot has entered
into a walled city."
Saul summoned all the people to war to
go down to Kyla to besiege David.
Let's go back up here a little bit.
Okay. Saul summoned all the people to go
to war to go down to David or to go down
to Kyla to besiege David and his men.
David knew. So now David somehow hears
that Saul has found out and he's
plotting harm against him.
And he said to Abiatha the priest, "Hey,
better bring the ephod over here.
I have some questions for God." So then
David said, "Oh Lord, the God of Israel,
your servant has surely heard that Saul
seeks to come to Kila to destroy the
city on my account.
Will the men of Kyla surrender me into
his hand?"
Will Saul come down as your servant has
heard? So he asked two questions. Is
Saul going to come down here? And when
he does, will the men of the city turn
me over to Saul?
Oh Lord, the God of Israel, please tell
your servant.
There.
Okay, I'm getting lost here. There we
go.
Come on.
Right here.
Okay. Please tell your servant. And the
Lord said he will come down.
Then David said, 'Will the men of Kyla,
I mean, he asked it again. Will the men
of Kila surrender me and my men into the
hand of Saul? And the Lord said, 'Yep,
they will surrender you. They're going
to hand you over. Now, what if you were
David, what would you do?
You would do what David does. Uh, let's
get out of here.
David leaves. And if we read the rest of
the chapter, we've realized Saul hears
that, too, and he turns around and goes
home. Now, do you get the point? God
forneew things that never happened.
Saul does not get to the city and the
men do not hand David over because David
ain't there.
Fore
does not necessitate predestination.
>> Okay? God fornows two things that never
happen. If they were predestinated,
they'd have to happen.
>> So don't go blaming God
>> for wanting evil.
>> You can blame God for giving you life
>> and making you like him, which included
the attribute of freedom,
but you can only blame yourself for
abusing the good gift of God.
Okay, that's the point.
So, if you if you take this back to
Genesis, what does God want?
He wants a family.
God knows, again, pardon the pun, the
fallout of the decision. He knows that
evil's going to arise up because we're
not him. We like him, but we're not him.
But God would rather have us
and have that circumstance develop and
be grieved by it even more than we are
than never have us at all.
The the problem, you know, the
disconnect for us is we don't not only
don't we look at we don't look at other
people this way, we don't even look at
ourselves that way.
You know it it
Stovall I know talks a lot about and and
you know I talk a lot about
identity and mission.
It all goes back to this. God wants
humans in his family. He wants humans
sharing space with his presence. That is
the most normal condition
for God when he thinks of humans because
that is what he originally planned.
God's work. And we're going to talk
about in the next session that we're
going to talk about the rebellions and
the meta narrative and how rebellions
just especially supernatural rebellion
just sort of change the landscape and
how that leads up to the mission of
Jesus and our mission as as images of
Jesus. But that whole, you know, set of
circumstances,
what God wants never changes.
There was never a plan B.
There is only plan A. Because the meta
narrative of scripture is going to be
now that we've had rebellion, now that
we've had the fall and we've had there's
going to be more than one fall, more
than one supernatural rebellion, more
than one human rebellion. Now that we
have essentially the world, you know,
going to hell in the hand basket as the
idiom, you know, we we use to express
it, just this total chaos.
God doesn't say,
"I must have had a bad day.
Maybe I can fix this with some other
plan."
There is no other plan.
So the story of the Bible is God trying
to return humanity back to recover its
identity
>> to bring people back into the family and
then partner with him to repeat the
process.
That's what it's all about. And we are
constantly thwarted by supernatural
enemies and the humans that are deceived
by those supernatural enemies and the
effects that supernatural rebellion has
on us to impede
God getting his way.
More transcripts
Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

VOLTAIRE : Portrait souvenir [RTF, 1961] (avec André Maurois)
Rien ne veut rien dire · French

VICTOR HUGO : Portrait souvenir [RTF, 1961]
Rien ne veut rien dire · French

مبررات طرح سؤال ما الحاجة الى تدريس الفلسفة اليوم؟
الموسوعة الفلسفية · Arabic

١- وقفات مع جاك لاكان
طارق القرني · Arabic

الإنسان والتحولات المعاصرة الكبرى مع د. فوزية محمد مراد و د. محمد زكّاري.
حلقة الرياض الفلسفية - حرف · Arabic

Outer Space: The Next Economic Frontier | WSJ
WSJ Events · English

وثائقي | أكل اللحوم من منظور فلسفي أخلاقي | وثائقية دي دبليو
DW Documentary وثائقية دي دبليو · Arabic

بودكاست 1949 | الترجمة جسر الحضارات
وزارة الثقافة Ministry of Culture · Arabic

La fascinante historia del Juego de Tronos de la IA
Gustavo Entrala · Spanish

La historia de ANTHROPIC, los creadores de la IA que puede DESTRUIR el mundo (o salvarlo)
Gustavo Entrala · Spanish

OpenAI revela su verdadero plan tras alcanzar la AGI
AI Revolution en Español · Spanish

How To Predict Reversals Using our HFT Algo Scanner? || #nifty #banknifty #reliance #tcs #infy
Derivatives Indicators · English
Get the TLDR of any YouTube video
Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.