Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

The Origins of the Rapture

26:364,872 words · ~24 min readUrduTranscribed May 11, 2026
AI Summary

The idea of a 'pre-tribulation Rapture' is a relatively modern theological framework popularized in the 1800s, rather than an original biblical teaching. It relies on a specific 'dispensationalist' reading of Scripture that is currently declining in academic theology while remaining a staple of American folk religion.

Understanding the Rapture's history reveals how specific 19th-century interpretations transformed from fringe theories into a dominant cultural and political force in American Evangelicalism.

Section summaries

0:00-1:00

Pop Culture Intro

optional

References the Nicolas Cage movie 'Left Behind' to set the stage for common tropes.

1:00-3:00

Theological Framework

watch

Defines core terms like dispensationalism and pre-millennialism necessary for the video.

3:00-10:00

Biblical Analysis

watch

Deep dive into the Greek and cultural context of Paul's letters and the Gospels.

10:00-16:00

Early Church Fringe Texts

optional

Discusses obscure medieval and late antique texts that may or may not hint at Rapture ideas.

16:00-22:00

Darby and Scofield

watch

Essential history of how the Rapture was systematized and popularized in the US.

26:00-26:00

Webinar Promotion

skip

Promotion for a past event on the Gospel of Thomas.

Key points

  • Dispensational Pre-millennialism — A theological system popularized by John Nelson Darby which divides history into distinct 'dispensations' or ages of God's relationship with humanity, culminating in a two-stage return of Christ.
  • Imperial Imagery in 1 Thessalonians — Scholars like Helmut Koester argue that Paul's use of the word 'apantesis' (meeting a dignitary) suggests believers would meet Jesus in the air to escort him immediately back to Earth, not to flee to Heaven.
  • Misinterpretation of Matthew 24 — In the passage where one is 'taken' and one 'left,' the context of the Great Flood suggests those 'taken' are actually being swept away to judgment/destruction, not rescued.
  • The Scofield Reference Bible — Cyrus Scofield's 1909 Study Bible embedded dispensationalist notes directly into the page layout, making the Rapture appear as an authoritative, scholarly interpretation of the text.
The notion of being Zapped away like in the Left Behind movies would have been Unthinkable to Paul. Narrator
The idea was spread not by theologians but by popular media. Narrator

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:00

in the blink of an eye Millions

0:02

disappear and the world is thrown into

0:04

chaos cars crash planes fall out of the

0:08

sky and there are piles of clothes

0:10

everywhere that's the upshot of the 2014

0:12

movie Left Behind starring The One and

0:15

Only Nick cage cage is an airline pilot

0:18

whose co-pilot and many passengers

0:20

simply vanish in fact Millions have

0:23

vanished across the world those who

0:25

disappeared were Christians taken to

0:27

heaven and the unbelievers were well

0:29

Left Behind the Left Behind movie was

0:32

based on a best-selling series of books

0:34

that outline a scenario in which true

0:36

Christians are snatched up to heaven

0:38

right before the appearance of the

0:39

Antichrist this climactic moment is

0:42

called The Rapture the sudden physical

0:45

removal of all living Christians from

0:46

the world into God's presence while the

0:49

Left Behind franchise is probably the

0:50

most famous example within the prophecy

0:52

fiction genre for many American

0:54

Evangelical Christians the core idea of

0:57

the Rapture is not fiction at all they

0:59

believe that the Rapture will actually

1:00

happen Rapture theology as interpreted

1:03

by many American Evangelical Christians

1:05

has several principles first of course

1:07

the Rapture the sudden disappearance of

1:09

Christians at any moment but

1:11

specifically a pre-tribulation Rapture

1:13

meaning that this sudden removal of

1:15

Christians occurs before a time of

1:17

global hardship and suffering called the

1:19

tribulation during this period a human

1:21

foe called the Antichrist will rise to

1:23

power finally at the end of the

1:25

tribulation the second coming occurs

1:27

Jesus Christ will return resurrect all

1:29

believers and dispense Justice to the

1:31

Sinners he will defeat the Antichrist

1:33

imprison the devil and establish an

1:35

Earthly Kingdom that will last a

1:37

thousand years the so-called Millennial

1:40

Kingdom after the 1000 Years there will

1:42

be a final confrontation with Satan

1:44

before he's defeated and thrown into the

1:46

Lake of Fire for good Scholars call this

1:49

theology dispensational

1:50

pre-millennialism it's probably the most

1:52

common form of rapture theology among

1:54

American evangelicals but there are

1:56

other versions that we won't get into

1:57

pre-millennial refers to the belief that

1:59

Jesus Will effectively return twice once

2:01

before his Millennial Kingdom in the

2:03

Rapture and then again after the

2:05

tribulation to establish his kingdom and

2:07

dispensational refers to the idea that

2:09

God's relationship with Humanity has

2:11

undergone distinct phases or

2:12

dispensations throughout history each

2:15

dispensation is a unique stage in which

2:17

God relates to humanity in a certain way

2:19

for many dispensationalists history is

2:21

partitioned into seven dispensations and

2:23

we are living in the second to last one

2:25

on the cusp of the end of the world

2:27

while virtually all Christians believe

2:29

in the second coming of Christ most do

2:31

not adhere to this view of the end times

2:33

belief in the Rapture is not promoted

2:36

among Catholics the different branches

2:37

of Orthodox Christianity or the majority

2:39

of protestant Christians however it is

2:42

popular among American evangelicals as

2:44

one of the largest religious groups in

2:46

the United States American

2:47

evangelicalism has a high visibility in

2:49

the country both culturally and

2:51

politically so the support of rapture

2:53

Theology and the huge popularity of

2:56

Prophecy fiction like the Left Behind

2:57

series gives the impression that this

2:59

view of the end times is more widely

3:01

accepted than it really is but it has

3:04

been hugely influential one historian

3:06

describes dispensationalism as perhaps

3:08

the most resilient popular theological

3:11

movement in American history

3:13

dispensationalist beliefs such as the

3:15

Rapture have even influenced U.S foreign

3:17

policy as former Secretary of State Mike

3:19

Pompeo is a dispensationalist

3:21

Evangelical and has spoken openly about

3:23

his belief in the Rapture so where did

3:26

this idea of a pre-tribulation Rapture

3:28

come from proponents of rapture theology

3:30

look especially to one particular Bible

3:32

passage composed by the Apostle Paul

3:34

which they argue refers to a

3:36

rapture-like event first Thessalonians

3:38

chapter 4 verses 16 and 17. it's worth

3:41

quoting the whole thing for the Lord

3:43

himself with a cry of command with the

3:45

archangel's call and with the sound of

3:47

God's trumpet will descend from heaven

3:49

and the dead in Christ will rise first

3:51

then we who are alive who are left will

3:54

be caught up in the clouds together with

3:56

them to meet the Lord in the air and so

3:58

we will be with the Lord forever so what

4:00

does this mean first of all I need to

4:02

stress Scholars are not 100 sure it's

4:05

famously one of the most confusing

4:07

passages in the entire New Testament as

4:10

the scholars candida moss and Joel Baden

4:12

say desp despite the many many studies

4:15

on this passage the cultural and

4:17

intellectual context of being quote

4:19

caught up in the clouds together with

4:21

the Lord and the air has remained

4:23

obscure has remained obscure is an

4:25

academic way of saying we just don't

4:27

know what Paul means here but let's try

4:29

our best this verse comes from a letter

4:31

that Paul wrote to a church that was

4:33

worried that the return of Christ had

4:35

not happened yet especially because some

4:37

members of the congregation had already

4:39

died without experiencing the second

4:40

coming that's not supposed to happen

4:42

they're supposed to witness the

4:44

inauguration of a new kingdom not simply

4:46

die so Paul is offering an

4:48

interpretation of what will happen to

4:50

those that had already died and ends the

4:52

passage with therefore encourage one

4:54

another with these words he was trying

4:56

to comfort a bunch of Christians who

4:58

thought the return of Christ should have

4:59

happened by now the dead in Christ will

5:01

resurrect don't worry the New Testament

5:03

scholar helmet Kester argued that

5:05

ancient Imperial military imagery is

5:07

bubbling under the surface of this

5:09

passage the text says the Lord himself

5:11

with a cry of command and with the

5:14

Angel's call and what the sound of God's

5:16

trumpet will descend from heaven this

5:18

description can be seen as echoing the

5:19

imagery of an emperor visiting a colony

5:21

or Province who would be escorted by

5:23

trumpets and other symbols of authority

5:25

when Paul says they will meet the Lord

5:27

in the air that word is translating the

5:29

Greek word apontesis which is a

5:31

technical term for the act of going out

5:33

to meet a dignitary or Monarch from

5:35

another city so according to kester's

5:37

interpretation which is shared by other

5:39

Scholars such as Bart Ehrman the people

5:41

meeting Christ and the clouds are

5:43

basically an imperial delegation of

5:44

emissaries going out to meet the emperor

5:46

Kester argues that there's no sense at

5:49

all that they will stay up there in the

5:50

clouds but rather will promptly return

5:52

to Earth escorting Jesus to establish

5:54

his new kingdom just as a delegation of

5:56

emissaries would escort the emperor into

5:58

the city Kester concludes that it is not

6:01

possible to understand this passage as a

6:03

statement about the Rapture of the

6:05

Believers into heaven in their study on

6:07

this passage Dr Moss and Dr Baden offer

6:09

another complementary interpretation

6:11

arguing that Paul may have been

6:13

influenced by ancient Jewish ideas that

6:15

God's chosen people will literally gain

6:18

the ability to fly at the end of days

6:20

the key text here is Isaiah chapter 60

6:22

verse 8. who are those who fly like a

6:25

cloud like doves to their coats although

6:28

this is a reference to the white sails

6:29

of a ship bringing the Israelites back

6:31

from diaspora later Jewish theologians

6:34

interpreted this text apocalyptically

6:36

those that fly like a cloud are

6:38

literally people who will fly at the end

6:40

of the world for example a passage in

6:43

the rabbinic text called the talmud says

6:45

in the future the Holy One will lift

6:46

Jerusalem three parasangs High unless

6:49

you think it is painful to go up to it

6:51

scripture teaches who are those who fly

6:53

like a cloud like doves to their coats

6:56

so according to this the end of days

6:58

Jerusalem will be a floating city but

7:00

fortunately you can reach it because you

7:02

will fly this idea is repeated in

7:04

multiple rabbinic texts not just the

7:06

talmud it's worth mentioning that these

7:08

texts are much later than the letters of

7:10

Paul but moss and Baden theorize that

7:12

the ideas found in these texts might

7:14

stretch back to the lifetime of Paul and

7:17

that these people being taken up in

7:18

first Thessalonians 4 may be viewed as

7:21

traveling via Cloud to reach the end of

7:23

days Jerusalem floating in the sky

7:25

do they stay up there well Scholars

7:28

don't know the phrase so will be with

7:30

the Lord forever might imply that they

7:32

remain up there in the clouds though as

7:34

we saw with Scholars like Dr Kester

7:35

others argued that Paul would have

7:37

likely assumed that these people then

7:39

returned to Earth regardless this

7:40

passage is not describing a Rapture Paul

7:43

is describing the resurrection event at

7:44

the end of days the same event he

7:46

describes elsewhere like in First

7:48

Corinthians 15 when he says that our

7:49

bodies will be transformed into Immortal

7:52

bodies in an instant but now he's

7:54

describing it with a colorful metaphor

7:56

of escorting Jesus like an emperor into

7:58

the city the notion of being Zapped away

8:00

like in the Left Behind movies would

8:01

have been Unthinkable to Paul proponents

8:04

of rapture theology have interpreted

8:06

this passage alongside other apocalyptic

8:08

passages in the gospels Matthew 24 says

8:10

then two will be in the field one will

8:13

be taken and one will be left two women

8:15

will be grinding meal together one will

8:17

be taken and one will be left keep awake

8:20

therefore for you do not know what day

8:22

your lord is coming these verses are the

8:24

partial inspiration for how the Rapture

8:26

has been depicted in film sudden

8:28

disappearance but in this verse it's a

8:31

bit vague as to who's being taken and

8:33

who is being left are the Believers

8:35

taken or the unbelievers the verse is

8:37

not entirely clear a parallel passage in

8:40

Luke 17 is more explicit on that day no

8:43

one who is on the roof of his house with

8:45

his Goods inside should go down to get

8:47

them likewise no one in the field should

8:49

go back for anything remember Lot's wife

8:52

which is a reference to the woman in

8:53

Genesis who looked back at the burning

8:55

city of Sodom while escaping turning her

8:57

into a pillar of salt because proponents

8:59

of rapture theology read these passages

9:01

alongside first Thessalonians they

9:03

assume that the one being snatched away

9:05

in Matthew and Luke is the lucky one the

9:07

one escaping Calamity but in these texts

9:10

the metaphor is surviving a Calamity in

9:13

Matthew 24 the disaster is specifically

9:15

a flood so the one being snatched away

9:17

is The Unlucky One Swept Away by the

9:19

flood the person who pauses to try to

9:21

save their belongings are the ones Swept

9:23

Away to judgment while those who are

9:25

Left Behind are the ones to be saved

9:28

without the context of first

9:29

Thessalonians no one would assume a

9:32

Rapture is being described in these

9:33

passages although the New Testament does

9:35

speak of a second coming of Christ these

9:37

and other verses taken by themselves do

9:39

not point to the end time scenario of

9:41

the sudden disappearance of Christians

9:43

these ideas developed over time and like

9:45

the belief in the Antichrist are a

9:47

Pastiche of ideas drawn from multiple

9:49

different biblical passages passages

9:51

that were not originally intended to be

9:53

interpreted side by side so if it's not

9:55

in the Bible where did the idea of a

9:57

pre-tribulation Rapture come from if

9:59

you've looked into the subject before

10:00

you may have heard that the Rapture was

10:01

invented in the 1800s by a man named

10:04

John Nelson Darby and as we'll see in

10:06

the next section that's definitely when

10:08

the precise Contours of

10:09

dispensationalist theology were first

10:11

developed systematized and popularized

10:14

but there are some possible hints that

10:16

Christians starting in the late antique

10:18

period believed in a pre-tribulation

10:20

rapture-like event even if that event

10:23

does not resemble the dispensationalist

10:25

version of the Rapture scene today now

10:27

I'm using the qualifier possible hints

10:30

because the evidence we're dealing with

10:32

are not well-developed theological

10:34

treatises the evidence I'm about to show

10:36

you are passing references in a small

10:38

handful of Fringe ancient and medieval

10:40

texts moreover these passages have been

10:43

analyzed almost exclusively by Pro

10:45

Rapture Evangelical theologians people

10:48

who may be motivated to prove that this

10:49

idea was taught by the early church more

10:52

research is needed in this field

10:53

conducted by more critical Scholars but

10:56

I'm sharing these passages as potential

10:58

evidence that problematizes the idea

10:59

that a pre-tribulation Rapture was

11:01

invented in the 1800s first let's

11:03

consider a document called The

11:05

Apocalypse of Elijah a text that was

11:07

circulated among Egyptian Christians

11:08

around the 3rd Century CE the document

11:10

outlines a scenario in which an

11:12

antichrist-like figure called the

11:14

Lawless one is persecuting Christians

11:15

when God sends an army of angels to

11:17

rescue them

11:19

on that day the Christ will pity those

11:21

who are his own and he will send from

11:23

Heaven his 64 000 Angels now those upon

11:27

whose forehead the name of Christ is

11:28

written and upon whose hand is the seal

11:31

both the small and the great will be

11:33

taken up upon their wings and lifted up

11:35

before his wrath archangels then lead

11:37

the rescued Believers into a liminal

11:39

Place simply called The Holy Land it's

11:42

unclear if the author specifically means

11:44

the land of Israel but it's a logical

11:46

conclusion the text draws imagery from

11:48

the book of Exodus in which the

11:49

Israelites follow a pillar of fire but

11:52

in this case the archangels Gabriel and

11:54

Uriel make a pillar of light once they

11:56

arrive in the Holy Land the text says

11:58

they will neither hunger nor thirst nor

12:00

will the Lawless one have power over

12:02

them the next chapter describes the

12:04

decline of the Earth the trees are

12:06

uprooted wild beasts and farm animals

12:09

will die in catastrophe birds will fall

12:11

on the ground so here we see a possible

12:14

early example of Jesus rescuing

12:16

Christians from experiencing the

12:18

destruction of the Earth but it's

12:20

nothing like the Left Behind Rapture

12:21

mainly there's no indication that

12:23

they're transported to heaven but rather

12:25

remain on Earth in a safe place the Holy

12:27

Land another example comes from a sermon

12:29

probably composed in the 7th or 8th

12:31

centuries called The Apocalypse of

12:33

pseudoefram pseudoephram because it

12:35

seems to have been forged in the name of

12:37

the Syrian Church Father Ephraim the

12:39

text describes a tribulation at the end

12:41

of the world you know the drill Wars

12:43

disasters diseases then the Antichrist

12:45

arises and rules of the world from

12:47

Jerusalem in this text is a passage that

12:50

appears to some Modern Evangelical

12:52

theologians as a rapture-like event for

12:54

all the saints and elect of God are

12:56

gathered prior to the tribulation that

12:58

is to come and are taken to the Lord

13:00

lest they see the confusion that is to

13:02

overwhelm the world because of our sins

13:04

this seems pretty straightforward but

13:06

it's more complicated than that Scholars

13:08

have described the end times theology

13:09

found in this text as confused

13:11

contradictory and muddled for example in

13:14

the very next section it says that

13:16

during this terrible time neither

13:18

Christian nor heretic neither June or

13:20

Pagan will have time to bury their dead

13:22

a few sections later the text says that

13:24

the tribulation will overwhelm all

13:26

people just an unjust which suggests

13:29

that the author assumes that Christians

13:31

are still there on Earth to experience

13:33

the tribulation they're not all gone The

13:36

Scholar David Malcolm Bennett one of the

13:37

few researchers to study this text says

13:40

that these pre-tribulation theologians

13:42

are imposing their own theology on the

13:44

text since pseudoefram seems to assume

13:46

that Christians are still on Earth

13:47

during the tribulation Bennett concludes

13:49

what is probably intended by those

13:51

comments is that the Saints will be

13:53

protected by God within the tribulation

13:55

rather than removed from it left

13:57

behind's rigid literal interpretation is

14:00

clearly alien to the thought of Ephraim

14:02

whose method was much Freer and more

14:04

imaginative

14:05

fast forward to the turn of the 14th

14:07

century a document dating to around 1307

14:10

called the history of brother dulcino

14:12

mentions a rapture-like teaching among a

14:14

renegade monastic order called the

14:16

apostolic Brethren led by a friar simply

14:19

known as dulcino this group was

14:21

violently persecuted by the Catholic

14:23

church and his leaders were burned at

14:24

the stake the text says that the members

14:26

of the apostolic Brethren will be caught

14:28

up into heaven three and a half years

14:29

into the reign of the Antichrist and in

14:32

this way they will be preserved unharmed

14:34

from the persecution of antichrist after

14:36

the death of the Antichrist brother

14:38

dulcino himself would return to Earth as

14:40

pope now it's worth mentioning that this

14:42

text was composed by an opponent of the

14:44

apostolic Brethren so we should be

14:46

skeptical that the text accurately

14:47

reports their theology but whether or

14:49

not dulcino held to this belief some

14:52

pro-rapture theologians in recent years

14:54

have held this up as an example that the

14:56

idea of a pre-tribulation Rapture was

14:58

held by at least some Christians before

15:00

the 1800s though with some important

15:03

changes notice that the text says

15:05

dulcino and his followers would be

15:06

transferred into Paradise not the whole

15:08

of Christianity only dulcino's followers

15:11

and there's little to indicate that

15:13

Jesus Christ is doing the Rapture and

15:14

returning here it's brother dulcino who

15:17

returns to earth judging from texts like

15:19

The Apocalypse of pseudoefram the idea

15:21

that God will rescue some or all

15:23

Christians and spare them from the

15:25

tribulation may have been held by some

15:27

Christians but these texts do not mirror

15:30

what we see in modern Rapture theology

15:32

two of our three examples seem to

15:34

suggest that Christians remain on Earth

15:36

during the tribulation and the third

15:38

example only describes a small group of

15:41

one man's disciples so how do we get to

15:43

the left behind style of the Rapture the

15:46

complete sudden removal of Christians

15:48

from Earth for that we need to turn to

15:50

this guy the Englishman John Nelson

15:53

Darby known as the father of

15:55

dispensationalism Darby was an

15:58

influential preacher Theologian and

16:00

Bible translator Who Rose to prominence

16:02

in the 1830s originally in Anglican

16:04

priest in Ireland he eventually grew

16:06

disillusioned with the church and

16:08

resigned his position in the 1820s and

16:10

30s he became associated with a

16:12

Christian Movement called the Plymouth

16:13

Brethren named for the fact that one of

16:15

their largest congregations was based in

16:17

the port city of Plymouth and Southwest

16:19

England

16:20

the Plymouth Brethren were a group of

16:22

anti-establishment Christians who

16:24

rejected professional clergy were very

16:26

critical of established churches like

16:28

the Church of England and claimed to

16:30

read the Bible literally now to say that

16:32

Darby invented dispensationalism in

16:35

general and the Rapture specifically is

16:37

probably an overstatement the concept of

16:39

dispensations predates Darby and at the

16:42

time pre-millennialism was already an

16:43

idea held by some Anglican Christians in

16:46

English and Irish intellectual circles

16:48

though more on the margins of those

16:50

intellectual circles moreover a Baptist

16:52

Theologian named Morgan Edwards who was

16:54

active decades before Darby throughout

16:56

the 1700s seems to have taught a version

16:59

of The Rapture that also placed it

17:00

before the tribulation so while Darby

17:02

was not inventing ideas out of whole

17:04

cloth we can definitely say that he

17:06

systematized and popularized the idea of

17:08

the Rapture within his complex

17:10

theological system that went on to get

17:12

very popular and we can trace a direct

17:14

line of influence from Darby To the Left

17:16

Behind series here in the 21st century

17:18

Darby argued that history tree is

17:21

divided into dispensations which we

17:23

defined at the start of this video as

17:24

discrete ages during which God relates

17:26

to humanity in different ways later

17:28

popular formulations divide history into

17:31

seven dispensations the first begins

17:33

with creation and ends when Adam and Eve

17:35

sin against God the next one is the

17:37

anti-diluvian dispensation or the time

17:39

before the flood which goes from Adam to

17:41

Noah and ends with the great flood

17:43

described in the Book of Genesis the

17:45

second to last is the age of the church

17:47

and the final is the millennial Kingdom

17:48

now Darby's exact divisions are not

17:50

quite so clear-cut he seems to have

17:53

divided history like this on screen

17:54

starting with Noah and ending with the

17:56

final dispensation that begins with the

17:58

Rapture Darby argued that these

18:00

dispensations were a boom and bust cycle

18:02

always ending in tragedy always with

18:05

humans failing the fall of humanity into

18:07

sin Noah's flood the Babylonian exile

18:10

disaster after disaster after disaster

18:13

like later formulations Darby believed

18:16

that we are living in the second to last

18:18

dispensation the age of the church but

18:21

even this dispensation is headed for

18:22

ruin like other Plymouth Brethren he

18:24

thought that most established churches

18:26

in this era have fallen into apostasy he

18:29

believed that only a small remnant of

18:31

Christians were truly destined to be

18:33

saved Darby taught that the church

18:34

dispensation would end with the Rapture

18:36

a two-stage return of Jesus first Jesus

18:39

would appear in the clouds and

18:41

Christians would rise to him as

18:42

described in first Thessalonians chapter

18:44

4 then seven years of tribulation then

18:47

Jesus would return physically to Earth

18:49

after the tribulation establishing his

18:51

1000 year Rule and commencing the final

18:53

dispensation as we said these ideas were

18:56

not 100 novel The historian Daniel

18:58

Hummel who wrote the most recent and

19:01

comprehensive history of

19:02

dispensationalism says that Darby was

19:04

not making entirely novel contributions

19:07

on any of these points but he was

19:09

shaping a new type of Christian identity

19:12

that bundled a condemnation of

19:14

established churches a pre-millennial

19:16

eschatology and a dualism Between Heaven

19:19

and Earth so how did Darby's theology

19:22

get so popular well the Plymouth

19:24

Brethren went abroad throughout the

19:26

mid-1800s Plymouth Brethren preachers

19:27

started to bring their ideas to North

19:29

America where they found a bunch of

19:31

people already obsessed with predicting

19:32

when the second coming of Jesus would

19:34

occur William Miller whose followers

19:36

would later form the Seventh-day

19:38

Adventist denomination taught that the

19:40

second coming of Christ would occur in

19:41

1843 or 1844 when this prediction failed

19:45

others stepped in with their own

19:46

predictions so the Plymouth Brethren

19:48

found a very receptive audience in the

19:50

U.S Darby himself also traveled to North

19:52

America visiting seven times between

19:54

1862 and 1877. he spent most of his time

19:58

in the American Midwest and New England

19:59

between several major cities and urban

20:01

evangelicals started to adopt his ideas

20:04

most importantly a man named Dwight L

20:07

moody moody was a Revival Preacher based

20:10

in Chicago at the time though he had

20:11

some disagreements with Darby he started

20:13

teaching pre-millennial ideas in his

20:15

sermons spreading far and wide the idea

20:17

that a pre-tribulation Rapture was about

20:19

to happen any day Moody thought he was

20:22

living in the final days he wrote I look

20:24

on this world as a wrecked vessel God

20:27

has given me a Lifeboat and said to me

20:29

Moody save all you can but Rapture

20:32

theology really exploded in the U.S

20:34

thanks to this guy Cyrus Schofield he

20:38

was a confederate soldier turned Union

20:39

sympathizer turned politician and lawyer

20:42

who converted to Evangelical

20:43

Christianity in the late 1880s launching

20:46

a second career as a theologian and

20:48

preacher he was part of the whole to

20:50

White L Moody movement and he started

20:52

preaching within the local Moody network

20:53

of congregations where he adopted

20:55

dispensationalist ideas he went on to

20:58

publish the Scofield reference Bible in

21:00

1909 a King James version of the Bible

21:02

with commentary explaining the text from

21:05

a dispensational pre-millennial

21:06

perspective so for example right here at

21:08

the beginning in the Book of Genesis the

21:10

Scofield bible has a subheading above

21:12

Genesis chapter 1 verse 28 calling it

21:14

the first dispensation below the text in

21:17

the footnotes it provides a helpful

21:19

definition of what that is and in a note

21:21

under the all-important passage first

21:23

Thessalonians chapter 4 verse 16 the

21:26

Scofield bible takes the two-stage

21:28

Resurrection narrative for granted

21:29

explicitly saying that the passage

21:31

describes the first resurrection so by

21:33

using footnotes and subheadings the

21:35

Scofield reference Bible basically

21:37

builds a pre-millennial

21:38

dispensationalist framework around the

21:41

entire Bible and as a study Bible it

21:43

presents itself as a scholarly Authority

21:45

using scholarly academic language to

21:47

disregard competing interpretations

21:49

especially rejecting critical biblical

21:51

scholarship and darwinian evolution

21:53

which made it a very popular bible

21:55

within fundamentalist circles and it was

21:58

very popular it sold one million copies

22:01

within a decade and exceeded 2 million

22:03

copies by the end of World War II the

22:05

Scofield bible thus spread

22:06

dispensationalist ideas like the Rapture

22:08

to millions and millions of conservative

22:10

Evangelical Christians effectively

22:13

solidifying dispensationalism as a part

22:15

of American Evangelical culture for the

22:17

rest of the 20th century so by the mid

22:19

20th century capture and other

22:21

dispensationalist beliefs had become a

22:23

staple of end times thinking among

22:25

conservative American Evangelical

22:27

Christians and it reached new heights of

22:29

popularity during the Cold War when many

22:31

began to look for a religious

22:33

explanation for current events like the

22:35

rise of the Soviet Union and the

22:36

establishment of the modern state of

22:38

Israel a new generation of Evangelical

22:40

authors started to interpret geopolitics

22:42

through the lens of dispensationalist

22:44

thinking most importantly Hal Lindsey

22:46

I'm speaking to you today from the last

22:49

Battlefield on planet Earth

22:51

Hal Lindsay was an author who sparked a

22:53

cottage industry interpreting current

22:55

events as fulfilling biblical prophecy

22:57

many people think that because this

22:59

man's called the Antichrist that he'll

23:01

appear to be evil but Satan's no fool a

23:04

graduate from Dallas Theological

23:05

Seminary he published a book in 1970

23:08

called the late great planet Earth it

23:10

was basically an explainer of

23:12

pre-millennial dispensationalism

23:13

packaged for a popular audience blending

23:16

prophecy spirituality and geopolitics

23:19

and it was a mega bestseller it became

23:22

the best-selling non-fiction book of the

23:24

1970s with 10 million copies sold in the

23:26

1970s and 28 million sold by the year

23:29

2000. the historian Daniel Hummel says

23:31

that the book entered the bloodstream of

23:34

American culture making the word rapture

23:36

a household term the book also

23:38

kick-started Decades of people

23:40

monetizing dispensationalist Theology

23:42

and Rapture predictions in books radio

23:45

shows movies and later on social media

23:47

notably one of these authors was Tim

23:49

lahaye the Baptist Minister who would go

23:52

on to co-write the Left Behind series in

23:53

the 1990s but he got his start in the

23:56

1970s soon after Lindsay published his

23:58

book though lahaye's first book was

24:00

nowhere near as popular as the Left

24:01

Behind series which sold 80 million

24:04

copies perhaps no other work is more

24:06

responsible for belief in the Rapture in

24:08

other words the idea was spread not by

24:10

theologians but by popular media and

24:13

here we see an interesting phenomenon

24:14

here in the 21st century tension between

24:16

the Evangelical Intelligentsia and

24:19

popular Evangelical belief Dr Hummel

24:21

argues that we're witnessing a collapse

24:24

in dispensationalist theology here in

24:26

the 2020s in the early 2000s

24:28

conservative American evangelicalism

24:30

swung toward what some have called new

24:32

Calvinism led by figures like the

24:34

Baptist Theologian John Piper Piper

24:37

explicitly rejected the concept of a

24:39

pre-tribulation Rapture as did NT write

24:41

an Anglican Theologian and Scholar who

24:43

became very popular among certain

24:45

segments of American evangelicalism

24:47

Wright explicitly attacked Rapture

24:49

theology in his 2008 book surprised by

24:51

hope Evangelical universities founded by

24:53

dispensationalists such as Biola college

24:55

and Gordon College ditched the theology

24:57

as well as did some Evangelical

24:59

denominations in 2019 the Evangelical

25:02

Free Church of America removed

25:04

pre-millennial theology from its

25:05

statement of faith so while Rapture

25:07

theology remains very popular today it

25:09

draws most of its inspiration from pop

25:11

dispensational writings like the Left

25:13

Behind series some historians go so far

25:15

as to call it a form of folk

25:17

evangelicalism as the theological muscle

25:19

backing the belief has diminished as

25:21

Evangelical theologians and institutions

25:23

have turned away from it all this to say

25:25

belief in the Rapture started on The

25:27

Fringe of Evangelical theology but it

25:29

may be headed to The Fringe once again

25:31

as we talked about in this video Rapture

25:33

theology draws a lot of inspiration from

25:35

first Thessalonians a text composed for

25:37

a congregation that was very concerned

25:39

that Jesus had not returned yet as the

25:41

decades and centuries went on Christians

25:43

started to Grapple with this delayed

25:45

return in writing developing new

25:47

theological Frameworks to make sense of

25:49

it one of these texts is the Gospel of

25:51

Thomas which has passages that describe

25:53

the coming of the kingdom of God as an

25:55

internal event rather than an external

25:57

political event I'll be teaching an

25:59

online webinar about the Gospel of

26:00

Thomas on Monday July 31st starting at 6

26:03

30 PM U.S east Coast time tickets cost

26:06

whatever you want I don't want cost to

26:07

get in the way think of this webinar

26:09

like a guided close reading of a very

26:11

complicated text I'll walk us through

26:13

the major themes in the Gospel of Thomas

26:15

some key passages and the scholarship on

26:17

what the text actually means if you

26:19

can't make it during that exact time

26:20

slot don't worry afterward I'll send out

26:22

a recording of the webinar to everyone

26:23

who signed up just head on over to

26:25

religion for breakfast.eventbrite.com to

26:28

join so again that's religion for

26:30

breakfast.eventbrite.com thanks everyone

26:32

hope to see you there

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free