Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

He Sold Everything... Here’s What He’s Buying

1:11:1912,542 words · ~63 min readEnglishTranscribed Apr 27, 2026
AI Summary

YouTube finance personality Graham Stephan has liquidated his entire California real estate portfolio to pivot toward a liquid, stock-heavy strategy centered on US equities, international markets, and Bitcoin. This shift reflects a broader market trend where the 'hidden' labor and risks of real estate are losing out to the superior liquidity and compounding potential of public equities.

When a prominent voice in property investment exits the asset class that built their wealth, it signals a major shift in risk-adjusted return expectations and the premium placed on personal time and liquidity.

Section summaries

0:03-2:07

Introduction & Graham Stephan Context

optional

Provides background on Graham's move, but the meat of the financial analysis starts afterward.

2:07-13:49

Real Estate vs. Equities Debate

watch

Crucial breakdown of why property is losing its luster compared to liquid stocks.

13:49-24:52

The Hosts' Personal Risk Profiles

optional

Interesting for personality fans, but mostly discusses their individual cash levels and recent business exits.

24:52-32:23

Emerging Markets & Bitcoin Strategy

watch

Explains the logic behind the pivot to international growth and crypto as a macro hedge.

32:23-39:54

Collectibles & Manga

skip

Niche discussion on Japanese magazines and dinosaur bones; low relevance for general investors.

39:54-48:21

Private Equity & Robin Hood Fund

watch

Important discussion on the dangers of illiquid private investments in a rapid tech cycle.

51:47-1:11:15

Stock Lightning Round & Peptides

watch

Covers high-interest tech stocks like Amazon, AMD, and the upcoming 'peptide super cycle' trend.

Key points

  • The End of the Real Estate Myth — Real estate is often viewed as passive and safe, but the hosts argue it is actually an illiquid, high-labor job where true net cash flow (after maintenance, taxes, and capex) often struggles to beat Treasury bonds, with most gains coming from leverage-driven appreciation rather than operational profit.
  • Liquidity and Optionality as a Superpower — Public equities provide the ability to rebalance a portfolio in milliseconds. This optionality is vital in a fast-changing AI-driven economy where business models can be disrupted overnight, unlike private equity or real estate where you are 'trapped' in a losing trade.
  • Democratization of Global Intelligence — The shift toward international and emerging markets (like Brazil) is driven by the theory that AI and robotics will democratize intelligence, allowing developing nations to leapfrog industrial hurdles that previously required a highly educated local population.
  • Asymmetric Betting and Portfolio Bucketing — The hosts advocate for keeping a core conservative portfolio while maintaining a separate 'big money bucket' for high-conviction, leveraged trades (e.g., Amazon options or Bitcoin) to achieve top 1% lifetime returns.
Equities gets you your life back. You have a 100% of your time. Like, you're not doing any work. There's no stress. Fully liquid. Chris
Real estate looks safe, but often you're just hiding that risk in the leverage and the illiquidity that you have in that asset. Chris

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:03

Graham Stefen built his entire brand on

0:05

real estate, becoming the voice of

0:07

rental property investing on YouTube,

0:09

starting with a small $59,000 house

0:12

renovation and turning that into a

0:13

multi-million dollar empire. And now

0:16

he's selling it. Not one property. He's

0:18

not trimming his portfolio. He's selling

0:20

everything. And at the same time, he's

0:22

shutting down businesses, selling his

0:24

forever home, and essentially

0:25

simplifying his investments across the

0:27

board. When someone like Graham Stefen

0:29

walks away from the thing that made him,

0:32

you pay attention. What does he see that

0:34

everyone else is missing? Today on Dumb

0:36

Money, he sold everything and we're

0:37

going to show you what he's buying.

0:40

>> This is Dumb Money Live.

0:45

>> Hey there, Dave here along with Chris

0:46

and Jordan. We are Dumb Money. Welcome

0:47

to Dumb Money Live. Quick reminder, if

0:49

you don't mind, uh, smash the like

0:51

button for the almighty algorithm.

0:52

Graham would be very proud if you smash

0:54

that for us. Uh, thank you guys for

0:57

joining us this morning, especially

0:58

those of you trolling us in the live

1:00

chat for delaying this episode not once

1:01

but twice. Technical difficulties

1:04

scheduling on our end. You might you

1:06

might tell Chris is remote right now.

1:08

He's he's many time zones away in Hawaii

1:12

right now. I don't know if you can uh

1:14

fill us in on anything that you're

1:16

working on there.

1:18

>> Yeah, I'm uh I'm here for a reality type

1:22

I guess YouTube show. Uh, you had the

1:25

pick, Dave, that floating platform in

1:28

the middle of the ocean they built.

1:29

>> I haven't. I'll I'll try to pull that up

1:30

and we can we can show a little bit more

1:32

about what you're doing later in the

1:34

show. Yeah. But we do want to talk to

1:36

Graham Stefen selling everything. He

1:39

posted this video that got 240,000 views

1:41

on YouTube and a post on X that just

1:44

went crazy viral. Uh, 3.6 million views

1:47

so far. It's all about why he's selling

1:50

all of his remaining uh rental

1:51

properties in LA. uh and he he goes into

1:55

the financial reasons, the non-financial

1:57

reasons, the kind of broader context of

2:00

uh uh real estate in California,

2:03

but the thing we're most interested in

2:05

is what he's doing with the proceeds. Um

2:07

because he gives a lot of financial

2:09

reasons. We've been saying this for

2:11

years, real estate, it's it's it's

2:13

messy. It's timeconuming. It's not

2:16

liquid. Uh, and Graham finally realized

2:18

that his net cash flow after all of his

2:20

expenses and taxes, insurance,

2:22

maintenance, all of that, he's only

2:25

making like four to 5%. Which he says is

2:28

like, why am I why am I taking all of

2:30

this extra time and energy to do what I

2:33

could do with a Treasury bond, right?

2:37

>> Yeah.

2:38

>> Yeah. So, um, when you guys sent all

2:40

this stuff to me, I don't actually watch

2:43

Graham. So, like I thought that he was

2:45

like a I thought he was like a dividend

2:47

investor guy. I didn't realize he did

2:48

real estate. Is that bad?

2:50

>> It's It's been a while since uh you've

2:52

you've uh hung out with Graham. No,

2:54

Graham is the buy and hold S&P and he he

2:58

got his start in real estate and

3:00

continues to manage or or continued to

3:02

manage a bunch of properties in LA. Uh

3:06

but he's just buy the S&P and hold the

3:08

S&P and he's changing that. He's he's

3:11

he's come out with a whole new strategy.

3:13

So I we have things to talk about,

3:16

>> but basically LA real estate is not

3:18

passive. It is, you know, people talk

3:21

about passive investments. It is

3:22

anything but.

3:23

>> Oh, Dave, no real estate is passive.

3:26

Jordan, by the way, Graham makes you

3:28

look like a degenerate gambler uh in

3:31

terms of how conservative he is with his

3:32

money, which I always have thought was

3:35

just ridiculously too conservative. This

3:37

is this is such an awesome thing when I

3:39

saw that note go out because, you know,

3:41

every time we're around him or I I'm

3:43

always obviously,

3:45

you know, promoting get more aggressive,

3:48

dude. Get get into the stocks. Get

3:50

leverage, dude. get it. And I I felt I

3:52

felt like the transition was happening

3:54

even before he sent that note out. And

3:57

when he when he did the post, I was

3:59

like, "Yeah, it finally happened." But

4:01

>> full disclosure, Chris and I have been

4:03

on his podcast a couple of times. Chris

4:06

is on it all the time. And you are

4:08

continuously telling him, "Get more

4:10

aggressive. You are, you know, these are

4:12

your investments are basically you're

4:15

you're 95% in cash." Why? Well, the last

4:18

time I was there, he f he he he bought

4:20

Amazon at 197 right at the low. And he's

4:26

>> I know. And I think that's part of it.

4:28

Like he's just like, "What if I would

4:30

have been doing this a long time ago?"

4:32

But here's the thing. This is this is a

4:34

conversation. It's an argument that

4:36

we've been having with so many people

4:39

and so many friends for the last 20

4:41

years. And quite honestly, it was a

4:43

harder argument back in the day because

4:46

most of the appreciation, and I don't

4:48

think people truly understand this, I

4:51

don't even want to say most, but a good

4:53

chunk of the appreciation in buying

4:56

houses and renting them out for cash

4:58

flow. It's all about the the increase in

5:02

value of that home over time. It's not

5:04

about the actual cash flow because more

5:07

times than than not, the cash flow that

5:10

you're generating from a rental property

5:12

that you purchased is so much lower than

5:16

you think it is, okay? Because of

5:18

maintenance, vacancies, capex, uh,

5:21

surprises, property management fees.

5:24

There are a million things that will

5:26

eventually dent your cash flow and your

5:29

returns in residential real estate. And

5:32

when you really dig in deep with guys

5:34

that have been doing this for like 20

5:35

years and they're close to you, they

5:39

will whisper to you and they will admit

5:41

that after all the repairs, after all

5:44

the maintenance, all they're all like on

5:46

the edge of getting out of it like

5:47

because like it's not what you think it

5:49

is. They're like we we're actually

5:50

making our money

5:52

>> based on the appreciation of the real

5:55

estate. So even if the cash flow is zero

5:58

with when you account for the

5:59

maintenance and all the headaches and

6:00

all the BS you got to deal with. Even if

6:02

that's zero, they're still making like

6:05

singledigit mids singledigit returns on

6:08

the appreciation. But guys, and and

6:10

yeah, the dream on paper is that that

6:12

your renter pays for all of your costs

6:15

and then some and then you're going to

6:17

make this big bank when you actually

6:19

sell the property at some point in the

6:21

future. But in a market like LA, the

6:23

appreciation has not really been on the

6:26

trajectory that historically it has

6:28

been. So it's it's like

6:29

>> well really from what I understand the

6:31

benefit is the leverage, right? So you

6:33

can buy a property, you leverage 80% of

6:36

it and your renter is basically paying

6:40

off that 80%. And so that that's where

6:42

you make your money even if the value of

6:44

the property doesn't go up.

6:47

>> Well, you get all that debt paid for.

6:50

But Jordan, that's that that's that's

6:52

hidden risk, right? And this is what

6:55

we're talking about. Like I think real

6:58

estate gives you the illusion of safety

7:01

because it's tangible.

7:03

>> But the reality is is once you get into

7:06

that game, you're taking on a lot of

7:08

leverage usually. And when

7:11

>> a ton of leverage, nobody goes out

7:12

that's in this game and just pays500

7:15

or $700,000 for a rental house. they put

7:18

down, you know, $100,000 and the rest of

7:20

it's debt.

7:22

>> Correct. Um, but there there is a

7:26

tremendous amount of risk in that

7:28

leverage, especially when things go

7:30

wrong, the market reverses, you're still

7:32

having to pay for repairs and at some

7:35

point you even get trapped in these

7:37

homes that you have leverage in. It is

7:39

that that kind of like that black swan

7:41

risk that real estate investors don't

7:44

fully appreciate because it doesn't come

7:46

around that often. But the risk is real.

7:49

It's there. You are in a levered asset

7:52

that's completely eliquid. Okay? An

7:56

eliquid asset that you cannot get out of

7:59

quickly at all. Real estate looks really

8:02

safe, but often you're just hiding that

8:05

risk in the leverage and the illiquidity

8:08

that you have in that asset. And for two

8:10

decades, I've been telling people, yeah,

8:12

real estate's okay compared to doing

8:14

nothing with your money, but compared to

8:17

equities, you're not even playing the

8:20

same game. If if you would have taken

8:22

all that money that you were putting

8:23

into real estate and all that time and

8:25

you would have just thrown that into

8:27

aggressive equities over the past, dude,

8:29

I don't care. You're always winning with

8:31

equities. And guess what? Equities gets

8:33

you your life back. You have a 100% of

8:35

your time. Like, you're not doing any

8:38

work. There's no stress. Fully liquid.

8:41

Like, it it is insane to me that people

8:43

just their whole life is on the real

8:44

estate track as opposed to the equity

8:46

track. I love I love that even the

8:49

biggest real estate guy ever who's been

8:51

preaching this is like, I'm done. And I

8:53

know LA is the worst of the worst in

8:55

that market, but still, it's the same

8:56

way across the country. Dave, we have

8:58

real estate friends here in Texas.

9:00

They're they're doing the same thing.

9:01

They're getting out of real estate into

9:03

equities. Same exact thing. Well, if you

9:05

just do the math and look at your what

9:07

your returns would have been if if

9:09

Graham went back and looked at what he

9:11

would have done if he had sold all of

9:13

his properties in 2020 or in

9:16

2018, you know, it just it and all of

9:19

the the mental energy and stress that

9:22

went into what he actually tried to do

9:25

in LA was uh it was just

9:29

the numbers would be uh way different

9:32

had he had he taken our advice. long

9:34

ago. That's all that's all I can say.

9:37

>> So, my my four things that I want all

9:39

the real estate guys uh to know that are

9:42

kind of evaluating real estate versus,

9:45

you know, investing in equity, right?

9:48

With equity, with public market

9:50

equities, you get liquidity plus

9:53

optionality, and that always wins. Okay?

9:56

You can buy and sell anything instantly.

9:58

You have all of your liquidity. um you

10:01

have true compounding versus trapped

10:03

equity in real estate meaning the

10:05

equities are going to compound cleanly

10:08

with dividends price appreciation real

10:10

estate returns get eaten up by all the

10:12

vacancies the maintenance affairs the

10:14

property

10:14

>> manage financial instruments you can

10:16

hedge your investments also and

10:18

>> you're right you could you could always

10:19

hedge and it's really easy to hedge you

10:21

Jordan you have time leverage uh with

10:24

equity with stocks you have no

10:27

operational load with real estate it's a

10:29

full-time job or part-time job unless

10:31

you outsource it, which is again is

10:33

going to kill your returns and your

10:36

>> I rented a house out once and it was the

10:38

worst. It was the worst. I mean, it was

10:40

like it was it was phone calls on the

10:42

weekends, you know, it was constant

10:44

problems. It was something went wrong

10:46

with the house, so now we've got to

10:47

write a big check to a plumber or

10:49

whoever to come fix problems. You have

10:52

none of those issues with an equity.

10:54

Like people are going to call you and

10:56

say, "Hey, Jordan, you own a thousand

10:58

shares of Amazon. Uh, we need you to,

11:00

you know, we need to,

11:01

>> we need you to come repair the warehouse

11:03

door. The warehouse door is stuck. We

11:05

need you to come deal with that for us,

11:06

Jordan.

11:06

>> That's right.

11:07

>> But, but Jordan, the real estate guys

11:10

will never talk about that because they

11:12

don't they want it to seem like they're

11:14

in this great investment and they don't

11:15

want people to know how hard they're

11:17

working or all their until they do until

11:19

they come out and then when they crack

11:20

and they start telling you all this

11:22

stuff, they admit that man, I wish I

11:25

just never got involved in this because

11:26

it's not what I thought it was. But the

11:28

by the way the fourth thing is very

11:30

important simply better risk adjusted

11:33

returns. Okay you know broad-based

11:35

equities generally returning 10% uh

11:39

annualize over the long term. Real

11:41

estate looks safer but the truth is that

11:44

those returns are like mid to high

11:48

singledigit but roughly half of those

11:50

returns are from price appreciation. And

11:54

now that we're in a world where you can

11:56

no longer count on the price

11:58

appreciation coming from just everything

12:00

goes up up up in real estate, we've seen

12:02

that that's not true. There is a real

12:05

risk factor there that your total

12:07

returns for all the work and all the

12:09

risk and all the ili liquidity is low

12:13

single digits. Like you're doing all of

12:15

that for low single digits when you can

12:17

be getting double to maybe triple in the

12:20

market where your only work is on your

12:23

phone. You could be doing it from the

12:24

beach. You could be doing it from

12:25

anywhere in the world, right? You're not

12:28

a landlord.

12:28

>> Yeah. The other problem is you got

12:29

really big liquidity lumps, right? So,

12:32

um you know, when you sell a house, it's

12:34

a really big event, right? It could be

12:37

$500,000. It could be a million dollars

12:39

um that you're having to take out. Maybe

12:41

you didn't need that. Hey, with stocks,

12:43

you can just sell some. You just sell a

12:45

little bit, whatever you need.

12:47

>> You You're right. And listen, there's

12:48

all these unexpected things that are

12:50

happening now. And part of the reason

12:51

why real estate is getting crushed is,

12:54

you know, the cost to replace an HVAC

12:56

unit today versus eight years ago.

12:59

Massively more expensive. The cost to

13:02

basically do anything in terms of

13:04

maintenance and repairs on your home is

13:06

so much higher right now than it was 5

13:09

to 10 years ago. And these things are

13:12

absolutely crushing the guys that have

13:15

20, 30 houses out there that the bills

13:17

are coming in and the margins on what

13:20

you're making in that ROI are not large

13:24

enough to to handle the bump in in cost

13:28

of ownership for these landlords. It's

13:31

it's terrible.

13:33

So, I I love it. I love it that like

13:35

Graham came to that conclusion

13:37

completely on his own. And I it's not

13:40

just him. It's so many real estate guys

13:43

that I know that are doing the same

13:45

exact thing right now. They're they're

13:47

moving into the markets.

13:49

>> So, let's talk about what he's doing

13:50

with the proceeds because we are very

13:54

still very different than Graham. Graham

13:55

is still super conservative compared to

13:58

us. And if you guys haven't yet

14:00

subscribe to Graham's newsletter, I

14:02

would highly recommend it. It's

14:03

completely free. You can find it from

14:05

his expost. I subscribe and I have

14:09

broken down his exact portfolio and

14:12

we're going to reveal all of that and

14:14

we're going to compare it to ours, the

14:16

the exact percentages of of where he's

14:18

allocating his money and how we allocate

14:20

our money. So, I a little tease, but

14:23

he's basically he's passive. He's uh

14:26

diversified. He's, you know, he's always

14:29

been that S&P 500 buy and hold investor

14:32

and he still does a lot of that, but

14:33

he's he's starting to diversify a little

14:35

bit more. So I think that's that's

14:37

interesting and we need to talk about

14:38

that.

14:40

>> Uh let's see. Go ahead. Hit what is it?

14:42

What does he got?

14:43

>> So and and it's a long article so I've

14:47

summarized it so I don't don't have to

14:49

uh like parse through it but basically

14:51

Graham is going to be 40 to 45% in

14:56

stocks and generally that is S&P 500.

14:59

Those are US equities.

15:01

>> Now let's compare that to to us. I am

15:06

usually 110% in stocks because I use

15:09

margin to buy stocks and then

15:12

occasionally options on top of that.

15:14

Chris,

15:15

>> uh, I have to check my balance. I've

15:17

kind of come off margin a little bit.

15:20

Dude, I am not I'm being really really

15:24

conservative right now. This is actually

15:25

nuts. Oh, I guess I'm I'm not accounting

15:28

for the options though that I have.

15:30

Okay, just in terms of equity, I'm

15:31

obviously always at least 130% equity to

15:35

200% equity. So, at this moment, I'm

15:38

kind of at 140% equity, which is really

15:42

conservative for me. But that doesn't

15:45

include uh stock options that I have,

15:48

which you know, I have, as you guys

15:51

know, I've been playing Amazon options

15:54

for the last few weeks like a complete

15:57

degenerate.

15:59

and it's worked in my favor, but I have

16:02

anywhere between I would say five and

16:07

15%

16:09

maybe maybe at one point it was as high

16:11

as 20% of my entire liquid portfolio was

16:15

in Amazon options. So, and these are

16:18

options that are like at the money

16:20

expiring in a week or two or three. So,

16:24

you know, if Amazon goes down $1, I lose

16:26

10 to 20% of my entire portfolio. That's

16:29

how confident I've been in Amazon.

16:31

>> You're so leveraged that on the most

16:34

conservative day you're 130% and

16:36

sometimes you're 500%.

16:38

>> 200%. But if you add the options in

16:41

Yeah. I mean, you start adding the

16:42

options, I think you can make an

16:43

argument that I'm 300%

16:46

uh 300% equity

16:50

>> between between the equity, the the

16:52

margin, excuse me, between the equity uh

16:55

the margin balance and then the options

16:58

300%. Is at at my most degenerate

17:01

moments.

17:04

>> That's uh pretty pretty insane. And I

17:07

think this would be the time that you

17:08

say you're not a financial advisor and

17:11

this is not something that anybody at

17:13

home should try to play along with.

17:14

>> I mean, look at me. Who who would want

17:16

to copy trade this guy? You got to be

17:18

out of your mind. Uh, no. No. This this

17:22

is this is about our risk risk

17:23

tolerance. And if you've been watching

17:24

the show the last seven years, you know

17:26

that Jordan's risk tolerance is the

17:27

polar opposite of mine. Dave sits

17:29

somewhere in the middle. I don't know.

17:31

Graham probably I didn't think it was

17:33

possible, but Graham like is is beyond

17:35

where Jordan is in terms of

17:36

>> It sounds like he's um way less

17:39

aggressive than I am.

17:41

>> So, how aggressive are you right now,

17:43

Jordan?

17:43

>> Me? Uh yeah. So, what I tend to do

17:48

>> um is I keep about Chris is going to

17:52

freak out when I say this. I keep about

17:54

a decade of cash.

17:56

>> Oh jeez. So, a decade worth of living

17:58

expenses in cash and then I invest the

18:00

rest. Um,

18:03

you know, what percentage does that

18:05

shake out at? Uh, well, the market's

18:07

been going up, so less now. I don't

18:09

know. Probably I'm probably like

18:15

80% invested. Um,

18:18

but I also have I also, you know, I I do

18:21

stock options and stuff like that too in

18:22

an aggressive account. So that that

18:25

would push that up, you know, in uh in

18:28

notional, but

18:29

>> yeah, but somewhere around 80%.

18:31

>> Yeah, but I like I like to keep a

18:32

healthy cash position and it's not cash

18:34

cash. It's in a you know, it's in a

18:35

money market that returns

18:37

>> whatever four something percent.

18:39

>> And we we'll talk about cash because

18:41

that is a big holding for for Graham and

18:43

not such a big holding for me and Chris

18:45

and a decade worth for you, Jordan.

18:48

>> All right. You don't want to know what

18:49

mine is, Dave? I I I do have some cash

18:52

in my bank account. I

18:53

>> Yeah. How much cash do you have in your

18:54

bank account?

18:55

>> I keep between three to six Well, about

18:59

I'd say two to six months of cash is

19:01

what I have. And I've been really

19:04

fortunate the past four years to have

19:07

one of the greatest cash flowing

19:08

businesses on Earth. Uh a Pokemon trade

19:11

show called Collecticon. For those that

19:13

you have been following me, you know, we

19:15

started this about four and a half years

19:16

ago. It is it started in the back of a

19:19

banquet room of a hotel. Uh, I'm an

19:23

owner of Collecticon and a founder with

19:25

my three business partners. And if you

19:28

kind of Google Collecticon right now,

19:30

you can read the press release or the

19:31

Hollywood Reporter uh, news article that

19:34

came out a few days ago. We sold the

19:36

company to Ari Emanuel uh, and you know,

19:39

the same kind of entity that owns like

19:41

what WWE and and uh, MMA and all that

19:45

stuff. So, I no longer have any cash

19:49

flow coming from Collecticon. And by the

19:52

way, it has been

19:54

>> that was going to be I was going to talk

19:55

about that after the show because that

19:57

deserves a huge congratulations. Your

20:00

your sale of Collecticon. Uh we people

20:03

have been talking about it in the uh in

20:04

the live chat already.

20:06

>> That congratulations. You you've now uh

20:10

>> surpassed a new milestone. Well, well,

20:14

Dave, it is the biggest exit I've ever

20:15

had from a private company. And quite

20:17

honestly, it's how I've been able to be

20:19

so aggressive on Amazon the last few

20:21

weeks because I knew there was like a 70

20:24

then 80 then 90% chance of the deal

20:26

closing. And I was like, worst case

20:28

scenario, half of the money I make on

20:31

this deal is wiped out because I lost

20:33

out on those Amazon calls. But I

20:35

wouldn't have been as aggressive on

20:37

Amazon without knowing that that big

20:39

chunk of money was coming in. It did

20:41

close. It's awesome. And like it feels

20:44

great, but now I need to make that money

20:46

grow because my cash flow, guys, has

20:49

gone down by like 90%. My restaurants do

20:52

pretty well, but listen, restaurant bars

20:55

don't cash flow that much. Uh, so now

20:59

I'm back to the pulling money from my

21:01

brokerage account every couple months,

21:03

two to three months to support my

21:05

lifestyle, which Jordan, that would

21:07

drive you nut. You do the same thing, I

21:09

guess, Jordan, don't you? You have to

21:10

pull money because you don't have cash

21:12

flow. You You haven't had cash flow in a

21:14

long time, right?

21:15

>> Like cash.

21:18

>> Yeah, I know. So that's why you're so

21:19

conservative. I'm in the same boat as

21:21

you now.

21:22

>> I don't have my cash flow engine

21:24

anymore. Collecticon is gone.

21:26

>> So now I I I need to think about that

21:31

more intently. At least

21:32

>> I've been in that boat for a while.

21:34

>> You could buy the You could buy some

21:35

dividend stocks.

21:37

>> Uh well, no. I'm not doing that.

21:41

>> I'm not I'm not doing that. You know,

21:43

the way I think about my my my equities

21:45

is I always assume that it will go down

21:48

by 70%. So, the number in my head when I

21:51

look at my portfolio, I subtract 70%.

21:54

And that's the number and as long as I'm

21:56

comfortable with that number, I'm I'm

21:58

good.

22:00

>> Yeah. For me, I think about it like um

22:03

everything liquid, I feel comfortable

22:04

with it going down 50%. But that's

22:06

including a large

22:09

uh money market fund. But I so what I

22:12

think about really is that the 10 years

22:14

of cash is a let's say that we had like

22:16

a 2008 style happen right now.

22:19

>> I should have enough cash to get me

22:21

through without having to sell any

22:23

equities for that decade trough.

22:25

>> But you if you can afford that that as

22:28

such a like a mind you your mind can

22:31

just be at ease with that for me.

22:33

>> That's right. Yeah. I'm totally at ease

22:35

with the with them. If the market went

22:37

down 50%.

22:39

I would not think about it.

22:41

>> But then actually reduce your 10ear

22:44

runway to five years and put more uh of

22:46

your

22:46

>> Well, I would do that too. Yeah. So that

22:48

it's cash to put to work too, right?

22:50

>> But our stocks did go down 50% basically

22:53

a month ago. Like my portfolio was down

22:55

40%. The whole thing.

22:57

>> Oh, my portfolio was down like I mean

22:59

inclusive of everything like 5%. Oh,

23:02

Jordan, when my portfolio was down 40%,

23:04

that is when I double triple down on

23:07

>> I bought I didn't go insane, but I

23:09

bought when when the market dropped like

23:11

10%. I dro I bought a bunch of stuff.

23:14

>> The best buy that I had was ARM. Uh the

23:16

thing was up 30% since I bought.

23:18

>> But you didn't change your allocation

23:19

towards equities like like you're not

23:21

deeper in equities now because of that

23:23

drop.

23:24

>> Yes.

23:24

>> Oh, you are. Okay. Good. Good.

23:26

>> But you still have a 10ear runway in

23:28

cash. Huh?

23:30

>> But you still have a 10-year runway in

23:32

cash.

23:32

>> Yeah.

23:33

>> Even after Dave, there's a caveat though

23:36

that we're not thinking about with

23:38

Jordan. When he says 10 years of cash,

23:41

people don't actually understand how

23:43

little cash Jordan uses. He is the most

23:46

frugal. He's literally on gram level in

23:48

terms of frugality of lifestyle. He is

23:52

one of the most frugal lifestyle guys I

23:56

have ever known. He tweaks his sprinkler

23:58

system to save like $4 a month. Okay.

24:01

Like like Jordan, I don't even want to

24:03

know what you spend a month. It has got

24:04

to be so low. It is completely

24:07

ridiculous how cheap you are.

24:09

>> I I have a bit high. I probably don't

24:12

have as much expense as you do, Chris,

24:14

but I um think I'm in in between in

24:16

between you two, but I try to keep a

24:19

one-year buffer in my checking account

24:22

at all times just because. And I use my

24:27

uh I use the stock market as my cash

24:30

flow engine. So I don't I don't need an

24:32

actual cash flow engine. I'm just making

24:34

enough money in the stock market that I

24:36

keep replenishing and have a nice buffer

24:38

in my checking account.

24:40

>> I I think I'm in the same boat as you

24:42

now for the rest of my life, Dave. I

24:43

don't think I'll ever have cash flow

24:45

like I had the last four or five years.

24:48

Um

24:48

>> it's the way to do it. It's so much It's

24:50

so much better. I highly recommend it

24:52

now. Okay. So Graham is 45%ish

24:56

in US stocks. He's 25% in cash and

25:00

treasuries. But his biggest increase

25:03

here is international and emerging

25:05

markets. He is increasing for

25:06

diversification. He's seen strong recent

25:09

performance uh of 26% versus the S&P 16%

25:13

hedged against US stagnation with higher

25:15

growth potential from AI adoption and

25:17

lower baseline economies. He is putting

25:19

28% of his portfolio in international

25:23

emerging markets. How does that compare?

25:25

>> That is first of all, that is quite the

25:29

move for someone like him. That's really

25:32

aggressive.

25:32

>> Aggressive to me.

25:35

>> I Okay, so Jordan, I haven't gone in

25:39

deep on due diligence, but this is

25:41

actually a trade that I'm interested in.

25:44

If you really think deeply about AI,

25:47

automation, robotics,

25:50

how the world economy is going to change

25:52

over the next 20 years, there is a case

25:55

to be made that third world countries to

25:59

some extent will see some of the biggest

26:01

lift. Uh develop at least not maybe not

26:03

fully third world but like developmental

26:06

stage countries. I I saw a report that I

26:09

haven't had the time to read yet that

26:11

said Brazil was in the pole position to

26:15

benefit from the AI super cycle the next

26:19

couple of decades. I want to spend a lot

26:22

of time doing research before I make

26:24

that move. I'm assuming he has already.

26:28

It's interesting, guys. It It's really

26:30

interesting because all of a sudden,

26:32

you're democratizing intelligence.

26:34

You're democratizing the ability to, you

26:38

know, manufacture, right? You're

26:40

democratizing essentially everything.

26:42

And once you do that, you're getting rid

26:45

of the edge that you have or or third

26:47

world developmental stage countries are

26:49

able to do things that they could never

26:51

ever do because they just didn't have

26:54

the the intelligent population to

26:57

actually put things in motion. where in

26:59

an AI age

27:02

>> that intelligence just exists and it's

27:04

just freely available for any

27:06

government, any company, right? Like to

27:09

come in and and meaningfully improve uh

27:13

an economy. So I it's it's interesting.

27:16

I haven't done it yet.

27:18

>> It's something that I actually have done

27:20

and I've done it through ETFs instead of

27:23

trying to pick individual random stocks

27:24

in a market that I know nothing about.

27:27

>> Yeah, you can't. And a lot I mean like

27:30

trying to trade individual stocks

27:32

internationally on a large scale is

27:34

really hard.

27:36

>> Yeah. And so that it to me that's just

27:38

the easy button way of doing it where I

27:40

can I can be in that section of my

27:44

portfolio I would imagine will I I'm I'm

27:48

hoping grows faster than the S&P section

27:51

of my portfolio, but who knows? Um, but

27:54

I'm I would say I'm generally between

27:58

zero and 10% in international. Uh, I own

28:02

a property in Mexico, so that is not

28:04

really an investment, but that is a

28:07

chunk of money sitting in a developing

28:09

country. Um, but now I uh I'm

28:14

comfortably

28:16

10 to 15% in these emerging developing

28:21

international markets.

28:23

Jordan, are you in any at all?

28:25

>> What? International equities?

28:26

>> Yeah,

28:27

>> of course. Yeah. Um

28:29

>> like like developmental countries like

28:31

not just

28:32

>> Yeah, I mean China. So we got like C Web

28:34

um

28:37

>> ETF. Oh, at some point we need to come

28:40

back around to this subject uh when

28:42

we've done the research because it's an

28:44

interesting play here.

28:46

>> I think it's a Yeah, I think that could

28:47

be a whole show in itself. And speaking

28:50

of whole shows, Chris, I've noticed you

28:53

uh didn't retweet this episode.

28:56

>> Thank you, Dave. I'm I'm on I'm on

28:59

Hawaii

29:00

>> time here and my just not thinking.

29:03

>> We'll let you do that while we talk

29:04

about uh the next big chunk of Graham's

29:08

portfolio because that that pretty much

29:10

accounts for most of it. But he is

29:13

shifting from a tiny position to a

29:15

meaningful asymmetric bet on in

29:18

institutional inflows, ETF adoption,

29:21

debt uh deficit hedging on Bitcoin. He

29:26

is increasing likely to 10 uh 5 to 10%

29:29

of his portfolio allocated in Bitcoin.

29:34

>> We've kind of been in that low to high

29:37

single digits Bitcoin for a long time.

29:40

I'm at the lowest I've ever been in

29:42

Bitcoin. I want to say it's like 1% of

29:46

my portfolio right now. I'm not against

29:49

bring it up to two, maybe 3%.

29:53

But I don't necessarily I think there's

29:55

just too much opportunity in equities

29:57

right now with this AI super cycle.

29:59

There's I don't want to have money

30:01

sitting in an asset that's not directly

30:04

touching that super cycle.

30:06

>> Yeah. I mean Yeah. Yeah. Um, and with

30:09

Bitcoin, I'd rather just own assets that

30:11

are like Bitcoin related

30:14

coin like I've got Coinbase. I've got,

30:16

you know, um,

30:19

>> see, I actually do own Bitcoin. I've

30:21

I've held it for a long time. I I'm

30:23

holding it through this crypto winner,

30:25

although I did, uh, sell it and reby it

30:27

for the, uh, for the tax loss

30:30

harvesting. Uh, I am currently sitting

30:33

at 12% of my assets in crypto, primarily

30:36

Bitcoin. That's a lot, Dave.

30:39

>> Of my liquid investable assets.

30:41

>> Still, that sounds like a lot. I feel

30:44

like that's a lot even for you. It

30:46

>> is a lot. It is. I'm I'm more aggressive

30:49

than Graham on this. And you are the

30:51

least aggressive I've ever heard you

30:52

being in it

30:54

>> at 1%.

30:55

>> It when I become less excited about the

31:00

equities in my portfolio, I think I

31:02

would be open to having a larger Bitcoin

31:05

position. It's just I'm way too

31:09

hyped on this kind of we're still early

31:12

stage AI. I think the opportunities are

31:15

meaningful. I'm I'm leveraged and I just

31:18

want my money in other places right now

31:20

at least. I I think there's more upside

31:22

right now. But I don't know. The Bitcoin

31:26

people are gonna want a lot of Bitcoin.

31:31

>> How much uh how much are you in uh

31:33

CryptoKitties these days,

31:35

>> dude? I I've exited, you killed this,

31:37

all all of my NFTts are are are have

31:41

were sold uh shortly after the NFT

31:44

market started to come down. I I I'm net

31:46

positive on my NFT journey. The only

31:49

ones I kept are the ones that are super

31:51

special to me that I won't sell at any

31:54

price. Not that it matters anymore

31:56

because they're pennies on the dollar,

31:58

but but I love them and it was part of

31:59

that part of my life. And uh

32:02

>> but you haven't sold your Crypto Punk.

32:04

>> Well, no. I I h I do have a few crypto

32:07

punks and I think I am more likely to

32:11

buy more than to sell over the long

32:12

term. I think crypto punks will come

32:14

back. I know you think I'm nuts. I think

32:16

they will come back at some point in

32:17

time. It could be 15 or 20 years.

32:19

>> I can't tell you how glad I am to not

32:21

hear about NFTTS every day.

32:23

>> You hated those episodes so much,

32:26

Jordan.

32:26

>> I hate everything about NFTTS.

32:29

>> He He thought we And we were a little

32:32

insane. I was a little insane. a little

32:34

insane. I was I think I was very

32:37

levelheaded on that knowing that

32:40

anything I put into an NFT is flushing

32:42

money down the toilet, but there's some

32:44

fun in owning. I have one Crypto Punk. I

32:48

have uh that Logan Paul uh project. I

32:52

have I I still have uh the Polaroids

32:55

that have NFTTS attached to them. Well,

32:58

well, now the new man, all the guys that

33:00

were into that are now into uh the

33:03

pre-199

33:05

Japanese manga magazines. There's like

33:08

four that that's where all the appro

33:09

Dude, they're up like 700% in six

33:12

months. Okay, that's where you want to

33:14

put your money buying those manga. Now,

33:17

I think Graham's going to get into

33:18

you're going to get into this because

33:19

some of his stuff is in collectibles.

33:21

I'm actually kind of cautious on the

33:25

collectible market, but that pre99

33:29

Japanese manga that all the influencers

33:32

and content creators have been

33:35

accumulating, that is interesting. If I

33:38

was going to be in a collectible right

33:40

now, that's where I'd be putting my

33:42

money. Um, because they they just became

33:45

great. For those of y'all that don't

33:47

know, like the history of comics, right?

33:50

comics were kind of like the baseline IP

33:53

for all the Marvel movies and all the

33:56

cinema that we saw on on on all that

33:59

stuff, right? Superman, this that, all

34:01

that for 30 or 40 years. Well, now the

34:04

new hot thing is Pokemon and One Piece.

34:09

Well, the the base IP for how all those

34:12

things came to life were basically a few

34:16

years, like four or five years of these

34:18

Japanese manga uh like magazines or like

34:21

really thick magazines and and they were

34:23

basically worthless up until, you know,

34:26

this last year and people started

34:28

collecting them because they were graded

34:31

gradable for the first time. So now for

34:33

the first time this last year, the big

34:35

grading services will actually grade

34:37

these mangas the same way they do with

34:40

like comic books or Pokemon cards. So

34:43

you're seeing a massive lift in the

34:45

valuation and attention to Japanese

34:47

manga. So yeah, that that's kind of the

34:49

insiders alpha on collectibles right now

34:53

>> coming from the guy who just sold

34:55

Collecticon. That's that's some good

34:57

scoop. I might not have any alpha a year

34:59

from now, but I I I just sold this thing

35:01

a week ago, so I still have some alpha.

35:03

I'm still on the inside. Uh that and and

35:06

I think dinosaur bone dinosaur bones. A

35:09

lot of these guys are I I These guys are

35:11

crazy with their dinosaur bones. That's

35:13

another thing they're all buying, right?

35:15

>> I almost bought a dinosaur bone when I

35:17

was on vacation one time.

35:18

>> Like a real dinosaur bone.

35:20

>> Yeah, like a like a fossil.

35:21

>> Shouldn't that be a museum or something?

35:24

>> No, you're supposed to. Yeah. I I I

35:26

don't I do not own, if anyone's

35:28

wondering, I do not own a fossilized

35:30

dinosaur. There's not one in my house.

35:32

>> I don't think they have to be in the

35:34

museum. No, you could you can collect

35:35

them.

35:36

>> No, you can. And actually, you can if

35:37

you if you discover it and you dig it up

35:39

yourself, you can absolutely uh keep it.

35:42

>> Yeah.

35:42

>> This is the age of abundance that we're

35:44

talking about.

35:45

>> So many pieces, right? Um

35:48

>> I want a fully assembled T-Rex in my uh

35:51

in my atrium. That's that's what I

35:53

really want. It might it might fit

35:56

there.

35:56

>> You can you you can absolutely

35:58

>> like wrap around, but

36:00

>> yeah. No, not not at the in my Mexico

36:03

house because it has a doublestory large

36:06

20 by 20 room that uh I I would really

36:09

like to have a T-Rex there.

36:11

>> Oh, in the Mexico house.

36:12

>> Mhm.

36:13

>> Oh, okay.

36:15

>> Uh so I don't have any collectibles.

36:17

Chris, do you still have any uh Pokemon

36:19

cards or any anything that you would

36:21

consider collectible?

36:23

Yes, I have some stuff. So, because I

36:26

was having to do all these all these uh

36:28

collect collect shows the last five

36:30

years. So, I was traveling the country

36:33

basically just a thousand tables trading

36:36

Pokemon and all this other stuff. I

36:38

decided at one point in time that I was

36:41

going to corner

36:44

uh the market for uh there's these

36:47

Disney cards that came out and I

36:50

basically corned the market for Elsas.

36:52

So I have like more of these Elsa cards.

36:55

We're talking like six figures of Elsa

36:58

cards and I'm thinking about kind of

37:01

diversifying out of that. I also have

37:04

some sports card stuff that I want to

37:06

get out of. I'm actually not a big

37:08

believer in sports cards. I think that,

37:12

you know, they peak and trough based on

37:15

the age of the collector who was most

37:18

interested in those years of sports. So,

37:22

I don't love it as a long-term

37:23

investment. I'm just not a even though I

37:26

own Collecticon, I'm not a collectibles

37:28

guy. Like, I'm just not uh you know what

37:32

I like. I like

37:33

>> you surprised me all the time with

37:34

collecting uh cornering the market on

37:37

Elsa cards.

37:38

>> I It was

37:39

>> I would have never I would have never

37:40

guessed that about you.

37:41

>> I was bored and I had to spend so much

37:44

time at these shows. I just figured I

37:47

might as well get into something. And

37:50

there is a new Frozen movie coming out

37:53

in like 18 uh two years, a year or two.

37:57

And I think that will be the perfect

37:59

exit window uh for this Elsa collection

38:02

that I have built up over the past few

38:04

years. So, so we we we'll see. I mean, I

38:08

was just doing it for fun on the side,

38:11

but I'm getting out of all collectibles

38:13

now. Now that I'm out of collect, I'm

38:15

I'm getting out of all collectibles. I'm

38:17

done.

38:17

>> So, Graham Graham says that his uh

38:20

percentage of portfolio, it's just a

38:22

small hobby for him. collectibles uh are

38:25

basically passion assets that that do

38:28

have potential ROI like his 2005 Ford GT

38:31

is up 65%. Uh but he's very selective uh

38:36

analog uh he he's into Disney sells

38:39

supercars that sort of thing. Uh but it

38:41

is not something that he considers a uh

38:43

core to his investment portfolio. Um but

38:48

he does enjoy the drive for free

38:49

appreciation of his collectible

38:51

vehicles. I think he loves them though.

38:54

I think the thing is when you

38:55

>> He does and his his garage and his his

38:58

new space is basically all garage.

39:02

>> I listen if if you get enjoyment out of

39:05

collectibles and the appreciation if it

39:08

happens is just a bonus for you, right?

39:10

So I I I get why people love doing that

39:13

stuff. It's just it's just not for me.

39:16

My collectibles are are are stock

39:18

tickers or option tickers.

39:21

That's was what I like to call

39:23

>> you collect stocks. I collect stocks and

39:25

then I trade them out for different

39:27

stocks when I when I get bored with one.

39:29

>> Boom. And you you could see

39:30

>> so much it's so much more intuitive to

39:32

me.

39:32

>> Yeah. I can't even think about owning

39:33

cars. Like I'd rather just own

39:35

companies.

39:37

>> Yeah.

39:38

>> I get no enjoyment out of cars though.

39:40

To me, I look at a car and I'm like gh I

39:42

got to drive somewhere car.

39:44

>> I only enjoy ownership if it fits inside

39:46

of my phone. If I can't I don't want

39:48

physical

39:49

>> I don't want physical anything.

39:51

Okay. So, this last category for Graham

39:54

and this is uh this is one that I think

39:55

is interesting for us to talk about

39:59

because of our history with it. Private

40:01

equity. Graham says that he is

40:03

minimizing and exiting private equity.

40:06

It he calls it a big regret. Uh he says

40:09

it's illquid. It's a tax hassle. There's

40:11

discounts on the on exits. Now, he's

40:14

going to avoid anything that is not

40:16

tradable within weeks. I've heard some

40:19

things that private equity that there's

40:20

like a there was a big private equity

40:22

boom and that there's going to be a real

40:26

problem when these private equity firms

40:27

start trying to turn out of all the

40:30

different rollups that they've done. Um

40:32

I you know I I don't know what they do.

40:34

Do they have to try to take them public

40:36

now? Do they um you know I think they're

40:38

running out of other firms to sell them

40:40

to.

40:42

To me, that's kind of the biggest risk

40:44

of private investing in general. When

40:47

there was a market for it and people

40:48

were and there like there was new rounds

40:50

and there's always an opportunity to

40:51

sell. That's one thing. We're not in

40:53

that world now, right?

40:54

>> And other than somehow going public, all

40:57

of these things that are sitting in my

40:59

balance sheet of private investments are

41:02

basically written down to near nothing.

41:04

>> But some of these things seem really

41:06

weird to go public. Like there are

41:07

private equity firms who specialize in

41:08

like dentist offices, right? And so

41:10

you're going to send public like a

41:13

random collection of family dentist

41:14

offices.

41:15

>> I feel like those are just cash flow

41:17

businesses for the

41:18

>> Yeah. You just hold on to them and flow

41:19

the cash.

41:19

>> Yeah. And hopefully they pay dividends

41:21

at some point.

41:22

>> Yeah.

41:22

>> But at some point you have to return uh

41:24

money to to the equity holders in the

41:26

private equity fund.

41:27

>> Well Well, first of all, when we use the

41:29

word private equity, it means so many

41:30

different things. I I think the the

41:32

private equity that you're referring to,

41:34

Jordan, where they're essentially

41:36

aggregating dentist offices or vets,

41:39

>> I I think that's still probably a great

41:41

business. I think it's going to generate

41:42

great returns uh for people that are

41:45

invested in that type of private equity.

41:47

But the private equity has expanded so

41:50

much the last 10 or 15 years because

41:53

there's been so much money pumped into

41:55

the sector that they're getting outside

41:58

of their wheelhouse and they're just

42:00

starting to throw money into sectors

42:02

because they have so much money. And the

42:05

problem with any private investment is

42:08

that when you're going through a period

42:09

of time like we are now with this AI

42:11

super cycle, the world is changing

42:14

faster than we've ever seen it change.

42:17

And if you're invested in a business

42:18

that you can't get out of, that business

42:21

might lose its relevancy or the e the

42:24

the economic conditions that that

42:26

business operates under might radically

42:29

change due to something like AI. So

42:32

there is a big chunk of the private

42:34

equity sector that's invested in

42:36

businesses not understanding that the

42:40

world was going to change so quickly and

42:42

a lot of these businesses might get

42:43

their valuations destroyed the same way

42:46

that we've seen SAS valuations get

42:48

destroyed in public equities. The

42:50

difference is they can't exit. So if you

42:53

don't like being in Salesforce and

42:56

you're like this is a risk that we're in

42:58

this AI age, you could have just sold

43:00

your Salesforce three months ago or six

43:02

months ago. But if you have the

43:04

equivalent type of holding inside of a

43:06

basket of private companies in a private

43:08

equity fund, you can't necessarily get

43:11

out of that. And that's that's the

43:13

issue. It's similar to what we were

43:14

saying about real estate. People don't

43:17

fully appreciate how amazing liquidity

43:20

is in public equities. I've been

43:23

preaching this my entire life. The fact

43:25

that you can radically change in and out

43:28

of all of your portfolio in a

43:31

millisecond at any moment in time is so

43:36

valuable and people just underappreciate

43:38

how valuable that is except during times

43:41

like this. because we have a close

43:43

friend that was invested in one of what

43:45

the largest most prominent uh private uh

43:50

real estate uh funds in the state of

43:54

Texas, right? So all the big money

43:56

historically has been thrown into these

43:58

huge real estate funds where they would

44:00

own real estate all around the world and

44:02

they would develop properties. Well, we

44:04

saw what happened to commercial real

44:06

estate the last five or six years.

44:08

Massive freeze on commercial real estate

44:10

for a number of reasons. Part of it due

44:12

from work from home, part of it due to

44:14

escalating interest rates, uh part of it

44:17

due to uh construction cost uh

44:20

accelerating beyond what anybody thought

44:22

was possible. So, a lot of these funds

44:25

that were considered somewhat safe went

44:28

belly up. And we have a close friend

44:30

that literally lost a 100% of his m of

44:33

his money across all of the funds that

44:35

he had invested through this massive

44:37

institutional real estate, commercial

44:40

real estate. uh fund company, right? And

44:43

that's just not something that any of

44:44

these investors thought was possible and

44:47

they couldn't exit. There was no way to

44:48

get out.

44:49

>> Yeah.

44:49

>> Right.

44:50

>> Now, okay, there there's a new form of

44:52

investing. A question from the chat.

44:55

This is uh Nate wants to know what you

44:56

think about the Robin Hood Ventures

44:59

Index, which is which is a fund

45:01

basically. Uh and I bought it and I'm up

45:04

20% in it since it launched. Um it is

45:07

basically it buys startup companies. uh

45:10

preipo like datab bricks, revolt, maror,

45:15

airwalls, boom, supersonic, ramp, aura.

45:19

>> Wait, do they own actual shares?

45:21

>> They own Yeah, they own actual shares or

45:24

various uh instruments that represent

45:26

shares and you can buy it and sell it.

45:30

>> You say various instruments that

45:32

represent shares

45:33

>> or like SPVS and things. Um

45:35

>> yeah. Yeah,

45:36

>> they they may not because shares may not

45:39

actually exist or they may have a

45:40

contractual uh right to buy the shares,

45:43

that sort of thing.

45:44

>> I think I think it came from a good

45:46

place in that Robin Hood and Bahad are

45:49

frustrated that

45:52

regular investors, right, retail

45:54

investors get locked out of latestage

45:58

private investments, right, and then

45:59

they have to wait until the company IPOs

46:01

and they have to buy.

46:02

>> I think everybody should be frustrated

46:04

by this that Yeah. the public companies

46:06

you have access to is a fraction of all

46:09

of the cool companies that are out there

46:11

right now. Look, if and think about if

46:13

Andre were a public company right now,

46:15

what it would be doing, right?

46:16

>> Of course. But but Jordan,

46:19

>> I mean Dave, I would like it better if I

46:21

could just invest in individ individual

46:23

companies as opposed to the fund. What I

46:25

do love about it, I don't know the exact

46:28

terms, but I believe there's a 0% carry.

46:31

So, he's doing no carry on it, which is

46:34

very different from if you want to try

46:36

to get into those companies through a

46:38

private fund and you're paying a 10 or

46:40

20% carry. So,

46:42

>> so they have they have a an expense

46:44

ratio of 2.13%

46:46

until August and then a management fee

46:50

uh

46:51

>> uh of from 2 to 1%.

46:54

>> Annualized,

46:56

>> I believe. So, I' I'd have to more into

46:58

the details. It It seemed

47:00

>> reasonable. It was not like a 2 and 20

47:03

>> or 10 and 20.

47:04

>> It wasn't just a fee. It's just an

47:06

annual fee.

47:07

>> Yeah. normally you'll pay that fee plus

47:10

a 20% carry. So, at least he's not doing

47:13

a carry and and and that and that's

47:14

great. The difference I think is that

47:17

like I like to know the companies I'm

47:20

investing in and and I want to I don't

47:22

love investing in just like a blanket

47:25

>> a basket. Yeah. Yeah. A basket. Like I

47:29

>> you like to be able to pick and choose

47:30

your stocks, but these are stocks that

47:32

are not stocks that you can't buy

47:34

otherwise. And it's an interesting

47:36

concept to me to uh to allow individuals

47:39

to invest. And like I said, just full

47:41

disclosure, I did buy it. Uh and my

47:44

buying it has no impact on the price

47:47

because it's these priced elements

47:49

within it. And yeah.

47:52

>> Um yeah, I'm I'm neutral on it. Like I

47:55

said, I I want to pick individual stocks

47:57

and I want to be able to lever in and

47:58

out of them and quickly and all that

48:00

stuff. Uh,

48:01

>> I wonder if I wonder what the

48:02

maintenance rate if I can actually

48:04

margin on top of this.

48:06

>> That would be interesting.

48:09

>> Um,

48:12

what else guys? Is that his whole is

48:14

that his whole portfolio then?

48:16

>> That is his whole portfolio. Um, he

48:18

wants to be liquid. He wants to not have

48:21

any California real estate overall. He's

48:23

wants to be more aggressive on equities

48:25

and Bitcoin uh with less cash drag,

48:28

simpler liquid portfolio.

48:30

uh and he basically just wants fewer

48:32

moving parts. He doesn't want to have to

48:34

deal with uh returns that that are being

48:37

killed by expenses and taxes.

48:40

>> Did he mention a triple leverage ETF in

48:42

there?

48:43

>> He didn't mention that that I that I saw

48:45

the one the one that my entire

48:48

>> allocation to triple Q.

48:50

>> I I keep my entire uh retirement

48:52

portfolio in a triple leveraged uh ETF

48:55

at all times. whole thing. The whole

48:57

thing. I only keep 20% of my retirement

49:00

portfolio in that triple leverage ETF.

49:03

I listen Dave, we did the research on

49:06

it. Like on paper, theoretically,

49:11

we shouldn't lose all of our money and

49:13

it should theoretically generate 2x

49:15

returns even though it's a triple

49:17

leverage ETF after fees. Uh it should

49:20

generate about 2x returns theoretically

49:23

over the long term. uh if we don't have

49:26

the biggest crash in history and even

49:29

then

49:30

there's a chance it can come out and it

49:32

would likely recover it and

49:34

theoretically give us

49:35

>> theoretically because it's already gone

49:36

up so much that it would recover. Now I

49:39

I misspoke. I'm not 100%. I do have uh

49:43

some Robin Hood shares in that as well.

49:45

I I'm in I'm primarily in the leveraged

49:47

fund, but I do have some Robin Hood

49:49

shares that I think were given to me for

49:51

moving money to Robin Hood, but

49:54

otherwise it's fully in a leveraged ETF

49:57

currently in the leveraged uh uh UPRO,

50:01

which is uh the S&P 500. Uh I the one

50:05

thing I I I wish you know Graham would

50:07

do at some point and I wish a lot of

50:09

people would do publicly is talk about

50:12

having that higher risk higher reward

50:16

big money bucket separate account. Yeah.

50:20

Where they are investing in options

50:23

right and they are investing with

50:25

leverage. Maybe you know they're they're

50:27

in that triple leverage ETF. they're

50:29

maybe they're taking, you know, they're

50:30

buying options on high conviction trades

50:33

like what I did with Amazon the last few

50:36

weeks. Um, if you bucket that money

50:39

totally separately and just designate a

50:42

different type of money to go into that

50:44

bucket knowing that it could

50:46

theoretically get wiped out. I think

50:49

everyone needs to have that and it's

50:51

just frustrating that we we still don't

50:53

think that way as retail investors. We

50:55

still lump all of our money together and

50:58

we're afraid to take these big risks

50:59

because guys, what happened with me and

51:02

Amazon the last few weeks, as I've been

51:04

saying, you get one call right like

51:06

that. I I did it last year with Nvidia,

51:08

remember? And Robin Hood, you do that

51:11

one time in your life. You make one big

51:14

call that you're willing to put the

51:16

money in super leveraged and you get it

51:20

right and you become a top 1% investor

51:22

over your entire life just from getting

51:24

that one call right. That's how big of a

51:26

difference maker it has. and and it

51:28

could be years before you get that

51:31

confident around a particular company

51:34

and a time frame, but you want to have

51:37

money bucketed for that moment in time

51:40

so that you can go all in because like

51:42

you guys know what I did on Amazon. It

51:44

was insane.

51:45

>> It was insane.

51:46

And

51:47

>> your timing on that was uh just

51:50

miraculous and not because you knew

51:53

anything or had any you just you were

51:55

just had a very strong conviction that

51:57

Amazon should go up because of where we

51:59

are in the AI cycle and you just went

52:02

all in

52:03

>> guys when when the market hit its bottom

52:06

and it was the most like the worst of

52:08

the worst weeks. I don't remember was it

52:10

a few weeks ago, a couple weeks ago, uh

52:12

my account was down like 40% and I went

52:15

all in on Amazon options. My Amazon

52:18

options I think were up to as much as

52:22

40% of my entire full portfolio where

52:25

Amazon. So I was prepared to lose

52:26

another 40% of my liquid net worth.

52:29

>> But you had this check coming in from

52:31

Collecticon. You you you took risk. You

52:33

took risk when you had a very high

52:36

likelihood of having a a replenishment

52:39

event for any losses.

52:41

>> But even then, it would have been like

52:43

half of that check if I huge massive

52:47

amount of money.

52:48

>> Okay. So, tell us where where you think

52:49

Amazon goes from here.

52:52

>> We're going to talk individual stocks.

52:54

The the chat has been blowing up saying

52:56

you guys are stop talking about

52:57

collectibles. Tell me about stocks. So,

52:59

let's let's go Amazon. Where does Amazon

53:01

go from here?

53:02

>> I I still love it. I love it just as

53:04

much as I loved it at $198.

53:07

Uh where I kind of went all in. I went

53:09

all in more at like two some 205 and

53:12

then more at 215. It's at what 260 now.

53:15

258. I don't know.

53:16

>> I don't care to 300.

53:18

>> I don't even care.

53:20

>> Susa wants to know.

53:21

>> I'm all in. I'm all in. I'm not

53:23

>> 26343.

53:25

>> What I do, guys, is I continue to roll

53:28

up my options. So I basically take we've

53:30

talked about this in the past,

53:30

>> but you're not you're not still that

53:32

deep like 40% of your portfolio in

53:34

Amazon options. You've

53:35

>> No, because back

53:37

>> what I'm doing is I'm rolling my options

53:39

up. So I'm I'm selling my options. I'm

53:41

taking the profits and then I'm taking

53:44

some portion of those profits to

53:46

purchase new options at a higher strike

53:48

price obviously because Amazon keeps

53:51

going up. So I've essentially

53:54

>> taken the gains. Those are my gains. I'm

53:56

not losing them. I'm taking a part of

53:58

the profits to reup in new Amazon

54:00

options.

54:01

>> What would you just ballpark your

54:03

current Amazon option percentage out of

54:06

your total portfolio?

54:09

>> Uh I would say 5% right now today.

54:14

>> All right. That that may I I'll be able

54:16

to sleep better at night knowing it's

54:17

only 5% and not 40%.

54:20

>> Uh but I could get excited tomorrow and

54:23

it could go up to 10 or 15%.

54:24

>> I know that's that's what worries me.

54:26

All right. What are your What are your

54:28

thoughts on uh Robin Hood near-term?

54:30

>> Love it. Love it. Love it. Oh. Oh. Oh.

54:32

Near-term. I don't have any like super

54:34

strong thoughts on it like this week or

54:36

next week. Love it long term. I love

54:40

being able to buy it down here. I went

54:42

deeper into Robin Hood at 70.

54:44

>> Uh I think I just picked up some more

54:46

calls this morning. So like I just want

54:49

to be heavier Robin Hood, but not for

54:51

the week or for the month. This is like

54:53

I don't I don't know when Robin Hood's

54:55

going to pop again. It could be six

54:56

months from now. I don't care. I want to

54:58

have a bigger position in Robin Hood

54:59

long term.

55:00

>> You're in long. You're in for the long

55:01

term on Robin Hood. I'm in Robin Hood

55:03

for the long term.

55:06

>> Let's talk about AMD.

55:08

Michael Levescu. I'm I can't read these

55:11

names. It's too small.

55:13

>> Um, yeah, I have AMD. It's part of my AI

55:18

sector trade. I have a handful of

55:20

companies like Micron, AMD. I don't I

55:23

think I accidentally sold my Intel. It

55:25

makes me sick because I like I was

55:26

running out of money and I needed money

55:28

because my margin was capping out on

55:30

that Amazon trade. So, I was forced

55:32

>> like what is what is the what is the

55:34

dirtiest name in my portfolio? Intel.

55:36

>> Yeah. Well, it's just like

55:38

>> and then it just rocketed.

55:40

>> I had to I had to pick something and I

55:42

picked Intel to sell and of course

55:44

Intel's flying. Uh I have AMD, listen,

55:48

great. Like it's part of my sector, my

55:50

AI super trade, but it's not the one I'm

55:52

going heaviest in on. Uh, Micron. I I

55:55

love I love all of the uh memory

55:57

companies. Did you guys have you did you

55:59

see uh uh

56:00

>> SanDisk keeps just going crazy?

56:04

>> Uh Raku, the Japanese company we did a

56:06

show on. Dude, it's almost doubled. It's

56:10

crazy, dude. This is the imaging company

56:12

in Japan that basically uh is a healthc

56:15

care company, but they have imaging

56:17

equipment that they're repurposing to to

56:20

check the circuitry in AI chips before

56:22

they head to the data center. They're

56:24

one of like two companies in the world

56:26

that does this. Uh this the we did a

56:28

whole episode on this I don't know a

56:29

month or two ago and since we did that

56:32

episode the stock is up like 70%. Um

56:36

astonishing. Unfortunately, I couldn't

56:38

get leverage on that. uh because it's in

56:42

a global account, you have to transfer

56:44

into yen. There's no options. You can't

56:46

do margin.

56:48

But I I'm astonished. Uh Gian Shu Dong,

56:51

who is our close friend who tipped us

56:54

off on that trade, he did this like I

56:56

don't know 60page report on Reaku. He

56:59

really nailed it. Gianu nailed it again.

57:03

He's been on fire. He's the He's our

57:04

Bloom Energy guy, too. So, speaking of

57:08

Bloom Energy, too,

57:09

>> uh, see Bloom,

57:11

>> it exploded off of that um,

57:15

>> listen,

57:15

>> off of that uh, expanded contract with

57:18

Oracle.

57:19

>> This is what we've been saying.

57:20

>> It's it's up 55% in the past month.

57:24

>> But this is what we've been saying.

57:25

Bloom Energy is in negotiations with

57:28

every hyperscaler. So, like, when are

57:30

they going to when's the Meta

57:32

announcement? When's the Amazon

57:34

announcement? when is the Google

57:35

announcement? Like the they're what

57:38

they're bringing to market simply has to

57:41

be fully proven. Um, but they are still

57:46

>> and with each announcement it gets a

57:48

little bit more proven and easier for

57:49

the next company to actually take them

57:51

seriously because I think that that

57:52

their biggest problem was kind of people

57:55

not believing their tech and now Oracle

57:58

and then the stock booms up and if we

58:00

get another announcement I I just expect

58:02

that that chart should go up with a jolt

58:06

every time there's a new announcement

58:08

and if not I don't know what I don't

58:10

know what we're doing. The the issue

58:12

with Bloom is it's a super volatile

58:14

stock, right? So any bad news, any even

58:18

P, By the way, Bloom went down to what

58:21

$75 a share on quote bad news that we

58:25

knew was BS. That's why we doubled down

58:26

on Bloom. But

58:28

>> but it doesn't matter if it's BS. If

58:30

there's some rumor or some

58:32

misinterpretation of the market or

58:34

Bloom, people will take that stock down

58:37

so violently, it could drop by 40% in a

58:41

millisecond. So, if you're invested in

58:43

Bloom, you need to be ready for that

58:45

type of volatility. But wow, has Bloom

58:48

performed for us, man. That has just

58:50

been one hell of a call this year.

58:53

Uh, what else people want to know about?

58:55

Troy Baker wants to know if there's

58:57

anything new with Sphere, which is

58:59

another one that uh in the past month is

59:02

up 13%.

59:04

Uh up 430%

59:07

in one year. You were in this heavy for

59:11

uh the Wizard of Oz trade. Are you still

59:14

in it?

59:15

>> I

59:16

>> Anything new? And now I think I'm

59:18

pulling my account up because sometimes

59:20

I don't even know. But I believe I am

59:23

fully out of sphere.

59:25

>> I'm fully out too and kind of regretting

59:27

it.

59:28

>> Well, you know, like I said, here's the

59:30

deal, guys. It was a social arbit trade

59:34

and we entered sphere when there was a

59:37

massive information imbalance in the

59:39

company and we exited it when the rest

59:42

of the world

59:44

learned about what we already knew.

59:47

Okay. So since then the company has gone

59:49

up like 400%. And that's what being a

59:52

social investor is all about. Does it

59:54

mean that Sphere can't continue to grow

59:56

from here? Absolutely not. Um the

59:58

company could but but that's a different

1:00:00

trade. So I need to now understand what

1:00:03

new information do I understand about

1:00:06

sphere that the market hasn't

1:00:07

appreciated or is unaware of for me to

1:00:10

get back into sphere because I'm not

1:00:12

buying sphere as a fundamental you know

1:00:14

investor or as a technical investor. I

1:00:17

only buy and sell things as a social orb

1:00:19

investor. So that's why I'm out of

1:00:21

sphere. My thesis is now well known and

1:00:25

the stock price same listen bloom I

1:00:28

still think bloom is really

1:00:30

misunderstood by a big chunk of the

1:00:32

market. I think bloom if they continue

1:00:34

to execute if uh I think there's a lot

1:00:38

more upside to bloom if the company

1:00:41

executes because I do think they will be

1:00:43

a primary beneficiary of the power trade

1:00:47

for the AI super cycle. So, I don't want

1:00:50

to sell sell my bloom yet.

1:00:52

>> Let's talk about a stock. We talked

1:00:53

about our winners. We always also

1:00:56

address our losers. Let's talk about

1:00:58

TAC, Trans Alta.

1:01:00

>> Uh it currently uh three-month chart on

1:01:03

that it's down two and a almost 3%. One

1:01:07

month it's down 5%.

1:01:10

One year still up 44%. But we were not

1:01:12

in it for that for that rise.

1:01:14

>> But it's up 3% today.

1:01:17

>> Yeah.

1:01:18

>> Yeah. Well,

1:01:19

>> Transalta, uh, they got killed by a

1:01:22

couple things. One, the we were

1:01:24

investing in Transalta because of the

1:01:27

inevitable move of data centers to

1:01:30

Alberta and Trans Alta would be a

1:01:33

primary beneficiary as one of the few

1:01:36

companies that has excess power in

1:01:38

Alberta to partner with data centers.

1:01:40

Right? Then they hit a major delay with

1:01:45

uh their data center deal. The

1:01:47

administration here in the US from my

1:01:50

intel is pressuring all the hyperscalers

1:01:53

not to move into Canada. They want them

1:01:55

here. So that could present additional

1:01:59

delays going into Alberta. Three, they

1:02:01

had an exceptionally warm uh winter in

1:02:04

Alberta which kind of hurt their energy

1:02:07

situation there in terms of pricing. So,

1:02:09

it was kind of like the perfect storm of

1:02:12

bad news. I'm not selling because I

1:02:15

still believe I I think I have exited

1:02:18

part of my position because I needed to

1:02:19

exit partially out of a lot of positions

1:02:22

when my account got destroyed last

1:02:24

month. But I feel that it is an

1:02:28

inevitability uh that data centers will

1:02:31

get into Canada and Alberta

1:02:33

specifically. So, I'm holding the

1:02:36

majority of my position in Trans Alta.

1:02:39

It kind of sucks that we're not

1:02:40

participating in this market move right

1:02:42

now, but I'm not selling for now. I I I

1:02:47

think I I don't know how long it will be

1:02:49

with this administration before they

1:02:51

loosen up some of that rhetoric on

1:02:54

having to build just here in the US, but

1:02:58

I think it's an inevitability. So, it

1:03:00

could be two months from now or or 18

1:03:03

months from now before that story

1:03:05

finally gets to play out.

1:03:08

>> I'm hanging on to it. And uh as a as

1:03:10

just a tracker for knowing uh where this

1:03:13

is since we first talked about it, it is

1:03:16

down 14%.

1:03:18

Because that's what I'm down in. And I

1:03:20

>> People were asking about healthcare

1:03:21

stocks. Um I don't buy healthc care

1:03:23

stocks when tech stocks are exploding.

1:03:27

For me, healthcare is like a recession

1:03:29

stock because people overspend on health

1:03:31

care during recession.

1:03:33

>> So, I bought a healthcare stock. Jordan,

1:03:35

>> you did?

1:03:36

>> Yes, I did.

1:03:37

>> Which one?

1:03:37

>> So, it's a it's a s You know how

1:03:39

everyone's talking about this SAS

1:03:41

apocalypse, right? All these SAS

1:03:43

companies are getting destroyed.

1:03:44

>> Eliminated. I was trying to figure out

1:03:47

which of these SAS companies that got

1:03:49

destroyed, if any, do I actually like

1:03:52

long term that I that I think is

1:03:53

relatively protected from AI. And the

1:03:58

company I settled on was Viva Systems,

1:04:02

Vev.

1:04:04

um they are I mean you could research

1:04:07

them but they are basically in the

1:04:09

healthc care world and I think because

1:04:13

they sit in that world I think there's

1:04:15

simply more hurdles more regulation the

1:04:19

moat is larger I think the degree of

1:04:23

safety and trust that's involved in

1:04:26

anything that touches that sector is

1:04:29

going to make it more difficult for pure

1:04:33

artificial intelligence frontier model

1:04:36

companies to come in and disrupt the

1:04:38

space. So they got beaten down along

1:04:40

with all the other SAS companies and I

1:04:44

like them. So I I opened up I mean pull

1:04:46

the chart you could see look at that.

1:04:48

Wow. They literally got basically cut in

1:04:51

half by 50%. I took a position in the

1:04:54

last couple weeks. So we'll see it's a

1:04:56

long they're basically a cloud uh cloud

1:04:58

provider for the health sc life life

1:05:02

sciences industry.

1:05:03

>> Yeah. You see I don't really view that

1:05:05

as like a healthcare stock. When I think

1:05:06

healthcare stocks I'm thinking you know

1:05:09

like uh you know any of the any of like

1:05:12

UNH or uh you know

1:05:15

>> okay I I'm talking more

1:05:16

>> hospital stocks um HCA those types of

1:05:20

stocks. But we believe that the entire

1:05:24

sector is going to massively grow over

1:05:28

the next couple decades because of the

1:05:30

aging uh population. Right, Jordan? So,

1:05:33

>> I'm not saying that I don't like

1:05:34

healthcare stocks. I'm just not buying

1:05:36

any right now when tech stocks are going

1:05:38

insane. Whenever they roll over,

1:05:39

whenever tech stocks, you know, have

1:05:41

their next freak out and we're all

1:05:43

recession doom and gloom, then I might

1:05:45

buy some healthcare. But that's why I

1:05:47

like Viva Systems because they they they

1:05:49

got cut by 50%. Right? They got cut by

1:05:52

50%. They are a technology company that

1:05:55

I think long-term actually has some huge

1:05:58

tailwinds as more money gets pumped into

1:06:02

the entirety of the health care sector

1:06:04

with the aging population. So I I think

1:06:08

with with reg the regulatory environment

1:06:10

it gets really tricky Jordan when you're

1:06:12

talking about United Healthcare and all

1:06:14

these other you know insurance

1:06:16

companies. What is the government going

1:06:18

to mandate? I I have no clue. But I'd

1:06:21

rather be in a technology company there

1:06:23

that that's going to benefit from the

1:06:25

expansion of that sector that's somewhat

1:06:27

I think protected

1:06:29

>> from the regulatory environment. And

1:06:31

that same regulatory environment

1:06:33

actually might protect them a bit from

1:06:35

pure AI type companies that aren't fully

1:06:38

proven out touching patient data, you

1:06:41

know.

1:06:41

>> Yeah, I think that's good.

1:06:43

>> So related to healthcare and probably

1:06:46

the topic for an entire episode on its

1:06:48

own, but how do we invest in the peptide

1:06:51

trend? Josh wants to know.

1:06:53

>> Check back with us next week when we do

1:06:55

our peptide episode of Dumb Money. That

1:06:58

is going to be a good one, guys. This

1:07:00

peptide trend is no longer a trend. It's

1:07:04

officially a super cycle just like AI.

1:07:07

This is going to be one of the biggest

1:07:11

movements I think of the decade. Uh it's

1:07:15

unstoppable. It started just with kind

1:07:18

of rich guys talking about peptides from

1:07:22

their doctor kind of getting doing stuff

1:07:25

that no one else even knew about. And

1:07:27

now it's starting to scale out and

1:07:30

become democratized to where

1:07:32

>> it's gone ex mainstream and it will be

1:07:34

the thing that is on the Today show in

1:07:36

two months. And so we we definitely want

1:07:39

to get in early.

1:07:40

>> Guys, let me tell you this is no joke.

1:07:42

The the peptide trade is real. Uh we're

1:07:45

going to dive really deep into the

1:07:46

peptide peptide trade next week. We are

1:07:49

in the earliest stages of uh the

1:07:53

commercialization of peptides. I I look

1:07:56

at this moment in a similar way to when

1:07:59

I was talking about GLP1s back before

1:08:01

anybody was talking about GLP ones.

1:08:03

Remember Dave? When we were at the OMIC

1:08:06

trade, people thought we were insane.

1:08:09

I think like 35% of my portfolio back

1:08:12

then was in Eli Liy. Um and

1:08:16

>> yeah, you you were early on Eli Liy. Um

1:08:19

I was later that was that was good.

1:08:22

>> Jordan, I see

1:08:23

>> Novo Nordisk.

1:08:25

No, Novo. Actually, I'll take it back. I

1:08:27

was in Novo before really.

1:08:28

>> Novo was first. I own some Novo right

1:08:30

now.

1:08:32

>> I'm kind of mostly out of that stuff.

1:08:35

Yeah. Again, because the market, not

1:08:37

that it's bad, but the market now fully

1:08:40

understands everything that I understood

1:08:42

about the GLP1 movement back in the day

1:08:45

and how large it was going to get.

1:08:47

>> Um, I think peptides, guys, are

1:08:50

potentially that big. This is such a

1:08:53

massive storyline. We just got to figure

1:08:57

out the trades and

1:08:59

>> let's be mindful of time. We're we're at

1:09:01

an hour and nine and I know that uh we

1:09:04

>> got because I am stumping for

1:09:08

schoolboard elections.

1:09:09

>> Wait, what does that mean?

1:09:11

>> I don't know what that means.

1:09:12

>> Are you gonna be on a

1:09:13

>> So, I'm like out at the at the polling

1:09:15

sites talking to voters.

1:09:17

>> Oh, boy. Yeah.

1:09:18

>> Local politics. Very political.

1:09:22

Love it, man. Love it. Everyone should

1:09:24

get involved in local politics. That's

1:09:26

where people's time should be spent

1:09:28

trying to make a difference, I think.

1:09:30

>> Um, all right. Well, let's hope Amazon

1:09:32

keeps moving here, guys. Amazon earnings

1:09:34

next week. We might need

1:09:35

>> That's right. Oh, we we should probably

1:09:36

do an Amazon episode in addition to a

1:09:39

peptide episode if we, you know, we're

1:09:42

not going to be able to pull that off.

1:09:43

We We can do like one episode a month. I

1:09:47

I love the peptide episode research

1:09:49

because I'm I'm researching it for the

1:09:52

trade, but I'm researching it for

1:09:54

myself. I I I need to get some of my

1:09:56

hair back, man. I I need I I

1:10:00

>> I might be taking peptides, man. They

1:10:03

are the uh it's it's the supplement that

1:10:05

actually works. I

1:10:07

>> I was with a guy yesterday. He was on

1:10:09

this reality show thing with me and this

1:10:12

guy was 57 years old and I swear he

1:10:16

looked 37 tops. I said, "Tell me right

1:10:19

now everything that you're on right

1:10:20

now." And I I have a list I have a list

1:10:22

of the pep diets he's on.

1:10:24

>> Send me the list.

1:10:25

>> I will, man. Cuz like it's

1:10:27

>> You just send you to Brian Johnson's

1:10:28

website.

1:10:31

>> No, this guy was legit. Legit. I could

1:10:34

not believe like I I would do anything

1:10:37

to look like this guy looked. Um so

1:10:40

yeah, this is this will be a fun one. We

1:10:42

do our peptide episode.

1:10:43

>> All right, look for that next week here

1:10:46

on Dumb Money. Everybody have yourself a

1:10:48

great weekend. Oh, little uh view of

1:10:50

which island are you on there in Hawaii?

1:10:52

>> Uh I am on the northshore of Hawaii

1:10:56

leaving imminently. So like this is my

1:10:59

last couple of hours here. I've been

1:11:01

here all week. Uh, I'm I will be home

1:11:05

within hours. So

1:11:07

>> So we we'll see it was we'll see you

1:11:09

soon and we'll see everybody else next

1:11:11

week here on Dumb Money.

1:11:13

>> Thanks.

1:11:15

>> And I have to hit the button twice.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free
He Sold Everything... Here’s What He’s Buying — Full Transcript | YouTLDR