Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

The Physics and Philosophy of Time - with Carlo Rovelli

54:478,048 words · ~40 min readEnglishTranscribed May 27, 2026
AI Summary

Time is not a fundamental, unified dimension but a multi-layered phenomenon whose properties—like a single shared 'now,' continuity, and directionality—dissolve as we probe deeper into fundamental physics. Our vivid subjective experience of time's 'flow' is not an intrinsic property of the cosmos, but a neurobiological construct driven by entropy and memory.

This video dismantles our most fundamental intuition about existence, showing how the bridge between physical reality and human consciousness is constructed through thermodynamics and cognitive science.

Section summaries

0:00-1:23

Introduction & Metaphor of the Ribbon

optional

Introductory remarks and setting up the basic ribbon metaphor of time which is quickly debunked.

1:23-9:41

Dismantling the Package of Time

watch

Lays down the conceptual framework of time as a multi-layered machine that can be taken apart piece by piece.

9:41-20:45

Relativity and the Illusion of 'Now'

watch

Essential discussion on how gravity alters clocks and why a shared universal present does not exist.

20:45-33:12

Thermodynamics, Entropy, and Order

watch

Crucial segment mapping the arrow of time to entropy and exploring how our coarse-grained view of the universe defines 'order'.

33:12-38:44

Quantum Gravity and the Deletion of Time

watch

Deep dive into Rovelli's actual field of research, explaining why loop quantum gravity equations omit a time variable entirely.

38:44-44:16

The Journey Back: Reconstructing Our Reality

watch

Explains how our macroscopic, slow-moving experience reconstructs the classical illusion of flat space and linear time.

44:16-53:57

Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Emotion

watch

Connects physics to Husserl, Augustine, Proust, Buddhism, and neurobiology to explain the existential, emotional experience of time.

Key points

  • The Dissolution of a Global 'Now' — Special and general relativity prove that there is no objective, universal 'now.' Clocks tick at different rates depending on altitude (gravity) and velocity, meaning simultaneity is only a localized approximation within our immediate physical bubble.
  • The Thermodynamic Origin of Time's Arrow — The fundamental equations of physics (mechanics, general relativity, quantum field theory) are completely time-symmetric. The distinction between past and future only emerges via the Second Law of Thermodynamics, where entropy (disorder) increases.
  • The Perspective-Dependent Nature of Order — Low entropy (order) in the past is not necessarily an intrinsic feature of the early universe, but rather a reflection of our specific interaction with it. As a physical subsystem, our coarse-grained perspective makes the past appear uniquely ordered to us.
  • The Brain as a Time Machine — The sense of time passing and flowing is not found in quantum gravity, but in our neurobiology. The brain exploits the thermodynamic entropy gradient to build memories, trace the past, and actively project expectations into the future.
The notion of now makes sense on a radius on our on a bubble around us... there is no meaning of now outside this bubble. Carlo Rovelli
All the fundamental equation of physics luckily distinction between past and future... to distinguish in the past in the future you need entropy. Carlo Rovelli

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:00

it's shocking in my opinion is one of

0:02

the most shocking thing in its fact the

0:04

most astonishing conclusion of modern

0:08

physics which is we now are here what

0:17

now

0:18

means what is the meaning of now well I

0:21

know what is meaning of now for me huh

0:24

you know what is the meaning of now for

0:26

you is it the same now

0:43

thank you thank you for this very kind

0:45

of introduction the first thing I have

0:48

to do is to pull up this which I've

0:53

prepared before you came in let's see if

0:55

it yes sorry which I'm gonna use and

1:01

that would be my high high technological

1:04

equipment to talk about time that would

1:10

be my metaphor of time right time is a

1:12

time is a long line there is a present

1:16

there's a the past of our past more for

1:20

our past this is 10 minutes ago this is

1:22

yesterday it is last year down there is

1:24

Big Bang this is tomorrow and the future

1:27

we don't know so this is this is a

1:29

metaphor of time we're sort of here we

1:34

have one hour whatever with questions

1:37

and and so on so we're gonna cover that

1:39

and I'm gonna tell you that time is not

1:42

like that the message and so what I'm

1:49

gonna what I want to do is to give you a

1:56

sense of where I think we are about

2:01

understanding of this strange mysterious

2:04

things which is time it will be sort of

2:08

a journey for me time has been a an open

2:11

question from my early years and that'll

2:15

say adolescent from all the way through

2:17

my studying of physics and then into my

2:19

work as a physicist you know sort of as

2:21

obsession because quantum gravity

2:25

requires us to rethink what is time I've

2:29

been going around around around this

2:31

this question what is time

2:34

so in the book and in what I want to

2:38

tell you tonight is it's a bit of a

2:40

synthesis so that where we are what we

2:42

know what we think is true including the

2:46

parts that we don't yet know we are

2:48

confused we are confused about and I

2:50

will do it is a taking you to a sort of

2:53

journey

2:54

journey which is back and forth so I'll

2:57

start from this idea of time this long

3:00

line that passes we're here actually we

3:04

moved a little bit already with more

3:06

years and time passes and I'll show what

3:11

quite rapidly tell you what's wrong with

3:14

this idea why this is a wrong idea about

3:17

time and in which sense it is wrong and

3:21

this would be a step sort of down into

3:26

more and more general views of nature

3:29

where time has less and less property

3:31

and loses its pieces so to say all the

3:35

way to what I think is the current

3:39

understanding of the structure of time

3:41

which is that there is very little time

3:43

in nature and that would be the journey

3:47

the one-way journey and then there is a

3:49

journey back which is how from this

3:54

nature at the level of quantum gravity

3:57

which is sort of the bottom level of our

3:59

understanding of the physical world in

4:03

sense of general Eiling generality flows

4:05

how from there we get back to this time

4:07

to the time of our our experience so it

4:10

will be a long one one way and return

4:14

trip where I want you to lose all the

4:19

ideas of time to then sort of understand

4:22

back where where our Comment I come from

4:24

right so this is this is the time of our

4:29

experience first of all it's a long line

4:33

namely what would I mean about a long

4:35

line it's a it's a see what we mean it's

4:38

a sequence of moments instant now before

4:44

later which is ordered like the English

4:50

when they wait for the bus so maybe I'm

4:53

trying to Italian eyes you

4:55

but I don't want you to crowd it for

4:58

getting the next bus but all this

5:03

instant are for milonga along the line

5:06

they're there the one next to another

5:08

one in a one-dimensional thing this line

5:12

is it has a direction right the past is

5:15

completely different for the future this

5:17

is one of the most obvious thing and it

5:19

was trivial thing to say but let me say

5:22

it precisely because then I'm gonna say

5:24

it's not true the past is fix it it's

5:29

given we remember it we know it we have

5:32

traces of it we have books talks about

5:35

the past we have a department of in our

5:39

university that study the past is

5:40

history

5:41

we don't have many departments that make

5:43

a historical history about the future

5:46

there are traces in in in nature if you

5:50

look at the moon there are craters that

5:53

are formed by stones fell into me in the

5:57

past so the pasture is all the spaces

5:59

where memories in our mind the future

6:03

there's nothing like that there's no

6:05

memory no traces still has to come right

6:09

so that's part of this idea that we have

6:11

about time um time has a symmetric

6:15

property maybe we can talk about

6:17

duration of time

6:18

this chart I'm giving this presentation

6:23

for the last 45 minutes certain fix the

6:28

amount of time that we measure with

6:29

clocks and we know what it means this

6:32

interval being equal to this integral

6:34

being equal to this integral in clocks

6:38

measure that in clocks are devices that

6:41

are meant to tell us where we are along

6:43

this line what time is it where is where

6:45

am I is it already tomorrow it's not yet

6:48

in clocks are designed to work all

6:51

together that's the purpose of a clock

6:54

so if you take two o'clock some of them

6:55

apart wait a little bit you bring them

6:58

back together they still have the same

6:59

time if they had the same time if not

7:02

means one crock is broke one clock is

7:03

broken it's not going well

7:05

thank you thoughts um this is a

7:10

retirement a little bit past this is a

7:13

time of our experience now what's wrong

7:16

with this image first of all there's

7:19

nothing wrong obviously

7:21

as long as we carry on our daily life

7:25

it's a very good construction conceptual

7:29

idea about time that works very well in

7:31

our in our daily life but it does not

7:36

work it stopped working when we look a

7:41

little bit more far ahead and the more

7:47

we look far ahead the more this number

7:51

of properties that I described about

7:55

time go away so the main message somehow

8:01

the fool talk I'm giving is a time it's

8:03

not a single thing it's this

8:05

multi-layered concept that has all this

8:09

property that I told you is one

8:11

dimensional as a metric is oriented

8:14

there is the same for every body's

8:16

measured by clock and so on and so forth

8:18

this which in our intuition comes as a

8:20

package is time it's properly thought as

8:24

a combination of properties that we can

8:27

dismount one by one time and sometimes

8:31

this is is layered or is like a mekinese

8:33

likely engine of your scooter you can

8:35

take away one piece the carburetor you

8:37

can take away the piston you can take

8:39

away this you can take away that and

8:41

what remains is not the scooter what

8:44

remains is nothing at all and that's

8:46

going to happen we think when you take

8:49

away this take away that taker with that

8:51

what remains is nothing at all because

8:52

time is a combination of these

8:54

properties so let's see what properties

8:55

one by one the first one maybe I

9:00

mentioned three or four of these let's

9:02

say for to dismantle this idea of time

9:07

some of this you may know depending of

9:11

how much physics you know or

9:13

Shifa you've heard these stories already

9:15

some you probably haven't known some are

9:20

very solid knowledge some are things we

9:23

suspect them I would say the first three

9:25

a very solid knowledge but the

9:28

implications of taking all them together

9:30

are strong so first one clocks measure

9:35

time fine and clocks go all together at

9:38

the same spin speed oh that's wrong why

9:41

is wrong because it's a fact that if I

9:45

take two clocks and if I take two good

9:48

clocks and I move them apart remove one

9:52

or bring one higher and keep one lower

9:56

and I wait a little bit and I move them

9:58

together if these are good enough clocks

10:01

they will indicate a different time it's

10:04

a fact okay it was clearly understood by

10:07

a nice nine hundred years ago so in a

10:10

sense we've been knowing this for

10:12

hundred years but it's recent that we

10:15

actually have good rocks not these that

10:20

we can measure this and today with

10:22

atomic clocks with clocks that measure

10:25

easily one part time with an error one

10:30

in 10 to the 18 17 18 even 19 this is

10:37

very rapid advancing the technology of

10:39

clocks

10:40

so with these clocks you can take two

10:41

clocks at a different of altitude of 40

10:46

centimeters 50 centimeters and measure

10:49

that so the clock up here goes faster

10:53

than the clock down here there's more

10:54

time here there's more time for thinking

10:57

for for growing older for everything so

11:01

there is more time in your your head is

11:04

older than your feet your head as unless

11:08

you've spent all your time upside down

11:12

in which case is the other way around

11:13

okay why well why is it it's

11:20

it's a funny question yes one could say

11:23

why well because we know from general

11:25

relativity that the switch is a big rock

11:28

big mass slows down time so math slows

11:30

down next to it but why I think the

11:37

right question is why not

11:38

why is still this hard for us to digest

11:43

because we're used to time being the

11:45

same for everybody we used is to person

11:48

have the same age and they separate one

11:52

who goes to America the other goes to

11:53

China and they come back after a while

11:55

they still have the same age

11:56

that's our experience but that's not

11:59

right because they've aged it

12:01

differently depending on how they moved

12:03

the paintings have lived ups more up or

12:05

more down and and so on in our

12:10

experience

12:12

these differences are small and smaller

12:15

than our perception of time or the the

12:18

precision of our watches that we we

12:21

carry so we don't we don't we don't

12:23

notice that but if we lived a little bit

12:29

in in the future when I hope there will

12:32

be starships going around a fast speed

12:34

and coming down we will have to get

12:36

confront that so the reason for which we

12:40

think the time is the same for everybody

12:41

is because we used it we got used to

12:45

each by our approximation it's like you

12:47

know if we if you grew up in in the

12:52

Netherlands which is completely flat you

12:54

think that the earth is just all of the

12:57

same level and somebody says you know

12:58

there are some places of the earth with

13:00

us goes down who say no yeah it's called

13:03

mountains Wow right you have never seen

13:07

mountains then so you're surprised we

13:10

live in a region in which this

13:13

difference of time is small so we're not

13:15

used to this if we had a big massive

13:19

black hole not far from here will be

13:21

used to the fact that when you go to a

13:22

black hole you come back everybody else

13:24

as much has grown older than you good

13:28

which means already that this line is

13:31

just

13:32

wrong because the the time between here

13:34

and here two events is not fixed it

13:38

depends whether you were higher or

13:40

whether were lower for instance so it's

13:43

not there isn't a single time in the

13:45

universe already there are many times in

13:49

fact in ice ice and generativity they

13:51

don't have a single time we have one

13:52

time probably for every line good that's

13:57

point one now point to that follow quite

14:01

rapidly from that which in fact

14:02

something that Einstein realized even

14:04

before generative is special activity

14:06

but it has long take long for for

14:10

becoming absorbed because it is shocking

14:15

in my opinion is one of the most

14:17

shocking thing in fact the most

14:19

astonishing conclusion of modern physics

14:25

which is we now are here what now means

14:33

what is the meaning of now well I know

14:36

what is meaning of now for me you know

14:39

what is the meaning of now for you is it

14:42

the same now obviously yes because I

14:45

look at you you look at me and I say now

14:50

you say yes now I hear yes now so we're

14:52

in the same now right then wait a little

14:54

bit look at we are new now so a little

14:56

bit more moved here but we are together

14:58

always together the same now the think

15:02

of a moment when we look her out if I

15:05

look at you do I see you now well not

15:08

really because time lights take time to

15:12

come from you to me right so I see you

15:16

sort of a little bit in the past now

15:19

time takes a few nanoseconds to come

15:22

from you to me so I see you as you were

15:25

a few nanoseconds ago nanoseconds are

15:28

irrelevant but if you were on Jupiter I

15:31

would see you two hours ago and if you

15:35

were on a star I will see you four years

15:37

ago

15:38

close the star and if you were on

15:40

different galaxies and drum and I would

15:42

see millions of years ago so I couldn't

15:45

say now is

15:45

you see I see you and if you look at me

15:49

in the moment I see you you you are

15:51

gonna see me in the past in the future

15:55

for me so between the UIC and the you

15:59

that see me in the moment I see you

16:01

there's an interval between the two

16:02

which is a few nanosecond here

16:06

but few hours in Jupiter and millions of

16:10

year if you were in a different galaxy

16:11

so if the people in a different galaxy

16:14

want to know what we are doing now they

16:17

don't know because they're looking

16:19

somehow there is all this time for so

16:22

one say well alright okay this is

16:24

because it's hard to check but we can

16:26

devise things to say what it means to be

16:30

at the same time for instance I could

16:35

say well I look at you but I know you at

16:36

a certain distance you're in Jupiter but

16:39

I know it takes half an hour I'll take

16:41

four hours light to come here so four

16:45

hours in the future for when I look at

16:47

you that's now okay except that you be

16:53

maybe moving fast and four hours in the

16:55

future could be in my own future

16:58

maybe 10 years in my future so how come

17:02

the now be 10 years the future does make

17:04

any sense so the more you play this game

17:07

the more you realize that it's a

17:09

question which is ill posed there is no

17:11

meaning of now outside the approximation

17:16

in which we can disregard the time light

17:20

goes back and forth so what we mean by

17:23

now is we both look at one another and

17:26

we are in the same temporalities within

17:30

the resolution of time that we have

17:33

which means that the notion of now makes

17:37

sense on a radius on our honor on a

17:40

bubble around us which has a length size

17:45

L which is given by the speed of light

17:48

time the minimum resolution of time that

17:51

we can resolve the delta T we can

17:53

resolve that's the meaning of now there

17:56

is no meaning of now outside

17:58

this bubble with our brain without using

18:05

sophisticated clock to resolve probably

18:07

what a tenth of a second if you're a

18:10

musician you will be better than that a

18:12

tenth of a second light is much bigger

18:16

than the earth it's a big bubble around

18:19

the earth so on the earth we are all the

18:20

same now but it's just this Proxima B

18:26

which is a closest star has its own now

18:29

there's no sense of putting them

18:31

together you can set signal so one to

18:33

the other signal back but in between

18:36

there is no way of saying there's no

18:37

meaning of now and in fact people work

18:40

in general activities they're additions

18:41

work in general activity study solution

18:45

of Einstein equations they know very

18:46

well that this is four-dimensional

18:48

solution there is no preferred now no

18:52

objective now that you can pick up us

18:55

from from physics of from anything why I

19:01

said why this astonishing because what

19:03

is it real what does it mean to be real

19:05

well we are told that what is real is

19:07

real now right it's a Roman Empire real

19:10

no it was real in the past not now ok

19:14

but this now is only local it's

19:18

something happening on a distant

19:20

galaxies real well it may be in the

19:23

future maybe in the past but if

19:25

everything is real in between it's

19:27

confusing because there are things which

19:28

are the past on the future one another

19:30

what did this mean to be real after we

19:34

have understood that the world works

19:36

like that namely that there is not now

19:38

in the universe there are philosophers

19:42

who are discussing there that's why I

19:44

talked the philosopher who are

19:46

discussing that and and and you know

19:49

pulling each other here is and fighting

19:53

the the very meaning of being real of

19:56

reality in the sense of what is real now

19:59

has to be rethought after what we've

20:04

understood about about physics so the

20:05

idea of one insert of time it's

20:07

completely destroyed in our

20:11

little bubble we can talk about instance

20:13

of time that we share provided that we

20:17

don't go too fast we don't we don't not

20:21

precise but globally there is this

20:24

series of events in the universe with

20:29

some temporal relation between a couple

20:33

of them but no common now at all and no

20:37

order no order in the mathematical sense

20:41

two three and this is a little bit more

20:46

complicated and less well understood the

20:52

first well understood the first part

20:55

less understood the second part the past

21:01

is different from the future right where

21:04

there is a local past local future it's

21:07

the past Atif of the future so let's

21:10

forget that other galaxies select loop

21:12

let's look around us and yesterday is

21:15

completely different story than tomorrow

21:17

yes it is fix that we know it tomorrow

21:19

it's open we don't know it good so I'm a

21:24

physicist I want to know where does this

21:27

distinction come from in the laws of

21:30

physics and as you probably know the

21:34

laws of mechanics don't have this

21:36

distinction the laws of electrolyte

21:38

Yeti's don't have this distinction

21:40

Standard Model of particle physics does

21:42

not have this distinction general

21:44

relativity does not have this

21:45

distinction right so all the basic

21:48

equations of physics quantum field

21:51

theory does not have this distinction

21:52

all the fundamental equation of physics

21:54

luckly distinction between past and

21:56

future but for us the past is completely

22:01

different for the future we have books

22:02

written in the past we don't have book

22:03

through it in the future so where does

22:06

this thing shall come from well there is

22:08

a story about that which is there's one

22:14

finds that sees clearly the distinction

22:18

between the past and future with

22:19

thermodynamics and in thermodynamics is

22:22

one law which is a second

22:24

thermodynamics the the second principle

22:28

of thermodynamics that says that entropy

22:30

always grossed over the future so that

22:34

clearly makes a distinction between the

22:36

past and the future fantastic so we've

22:38

found the basic the key fundamental

22:43

grammar of the world the elemental

22:47

machine that distinguish the past or the

22:49

future that law was written by trousers

22:54

19th century but shortly later sometime

22:59

later Boltzmann and his friends marks

23:02

will also but Boston was I think the

23:03

person was greatest clarity understand

23:06

that this law is statistical namely

23:10

Boltzmann understand that is entropy

23:13

this quantity that you can compute

23:14

category and chemistry always compute

23:17

the entropy in in a reaction energy heat

23:21

you do this calculation you get the

23:23

entropy before and to be look after and

23:25

it always goes up Boltzmann understand

23:29

that the entropy is just not a

23:32

fundamental quantity but a measure of

23:34

how how mechanical things are disordered

23:37

right you know that

23:38

entropies disorder that's a great sort

23:42

of understanding that we we got

23:45

footballs but what mean disorder you

23:47

take you take a box you have some green

23:52

balls some red balls you put all the

23:54

green on one side the red on the other

23:56

side this is ordered you mix everything

23:59

this is disordered and if an entropy

24:01

counts exactly that how much order how

24:04

much disorder if they're separated this

24:06

low entropy do your little calculation

24:08

or entropy for mixes high entropy which

24:11

makes a lot of sense because when you

24:13

shake things I get disordered so entropy

24:15

goes up good now you look at these balls

24:19

green and red and your friend is

24:23

colorblind so he doesn't see any order

24:28

because his collar bright it doesn't see

24:31

any order so for him there's no order

24:33

for you to his order but actually is

24:35

worth of that your friend

24:37

a very keen eye that distinguished some

24:39

wolf you were a little small and some

24:41

little bit bit larger much better eyes

24:44

at yours you don't see this difference

24:45

so for him order means all the little

24:50

balls on one side all the big balls on

24:52

the other side so for him the entropy is

24:56

a completely different story so what we

24:59

mean by the order of the world see I

25:01

think you see clearly that order is in

25:04

the eye of the person who looks it's not

25:08

in the things themselves order counts

25:10

once instead of recognizing the balls

25:13

one by one if you if you number all the

25:17

balls and all of you give names to all

25:18

the balls whatever the way you put them

25:20

they are ordered in that particular way

25:24

[Music]

25:25

is only by distinguishing two big

25:28

bunches of balls that you can talk about

25:31

order or disorder and in thermodynamics

25:36

when Boltzmann understands a statistical

25:38

and depending on thermodynamics he

25:41

thinks he understand is that the notion

25:43

of entropy depend on the macroscopic

25:45

variables that you use to describe the

25:47

system on the coarse graining of the

25:49

system which is a simplification of

25:52

description the system which disappears

25:54

if you look at the micro physics of the

25:57

system all right so what does it mean it

26:00

means that this growing of entropy it's

26:05

tied to the approximation we make in

26:09

describing a system it's not fake is not

26:11

illusionary

26:12

but it depends on the way we've we've

26:17

described the system or the macroscopic

26:19

wave we have described the system which

26:20

in turns depend of how interact with a

26:22

system so it's not a mental thing is not

26:25

idealistic thing so the subjective

26:28

things the really concrete things depend

26:30

on the way you interact with a system

26:32

then we interact with the system is your

26:35

interaction with some variables of the

26:37

system which are few out of the many and

26:40

these few determine a coarse graining of

26:45

the microscopic variables and define a

26:47

name to be and then to be gross

26:50

oh this is fine so in the future the MPT

26:54

grows in the past the entropy with

26:56

respect to our coarse graining was slow

26:58

why was it universe all do it in the

27:02

past who order it I mean few if you go

27:06

to your little children little child

27:09

bedroom and they even is a complete mess

27:12

and the morning is an order

27:14

you know why is in order because

27:15

somebody put it in order but why the

27:17

Union who prepared the universe in order

27:19

and the universe in order in the right

27:25

way that looks in order for us mystery

27:28

yeah what does it have to do with time

27:31

everything because the distinction

27:34

between the past and the future is only

27:37

that is this strange order in the past

27:41

and I want you to reflect about that

27:44

because I'm saying something very very

27:46

strong this has been recognized by some

27:49

people I came back in the philosophy of

27:52

science Russell have clear ideas about

27:55

that but few it hasn't permeated I think

27:58

the the the global thinking about the

28:03

order of time everything in our

28:06

experience which is ordered in time is

28:09

because of entropy there is nothing else

28:12

in the world that distinguish the past

28:15

in the future except this entropy

28:18

concretely

28:20

any phenomenon that you can imagine

28:22

where you distinguish future for past

28:26

this an entropy if you if I throw this

28:30

it stops right if you film it and if you

28:34

look at back back backwards

28:36

this is starts by itself so you said no

28:38

no no no that's wrong so this is a

28:42

irreversible phenomenon okay there is

28:47

entropy

28:48

namely this heat what is going on is

28:51

that is friction and the mechanical

28:54

energy of the clock goes into thermal

28:57

energy off the table that go is a little

29:01

bit heated up

29:03

so all the molecules start of the table

29:05

start agitating because of the friction

29:08

and the order the motion of the clock is

29:11

transforming a disordered motion of the

29:14

of the molecules right every time there

29:17

is this thing shoved in the past the

29:19

future is because it's heat this entropy

29:22

this temperature

29:23

involved if there's no heat no

29:25

temperature if this rolls

29:28

this is move without heat it will go

29:29

forever and if you feel and and and

29:32

project it backward it goes forever in

29:34

the opposite direction

29:36

you wouldn't distinctly the future or

29:37

the past any mechanical thing you can

29:40

think about pendulum without friction

29:42

you take a movie you project the

29:45

backward with a pendulum the solar

29:47

system the earth of the moon goes around

29:49

suppose you film it you project it

29:51

backward who can say which isn't the

29:53

right one it's exactly the same motion

29:55

to distinguish in the past in the future

29:56

you need entropy disorder which means

30:04

that the reason we have traces of the

30:09

past has not in the future is nothing

30:10

else that entropy okay if we have a

30:14

texture say something it had to be this

30:21

has had to be some enter production some

30:24

heat some disorder at some point if a

30:28

monk in the Middle Ages in a monastery

30:31

wrote down something and now we know

30:34

something about the middle age because

30:36

we have this text in a world without

30:39

friction the ink would have not stayed

30:43

on the paper would have chopped away so

30:47

you need friction is a the ink glues to

30:50

the paper because it produces a little

30:53

bit of heat that this dissipate and so

30:57

it's some disorder which can happen

30:59

because it was a higher order in the

31:01

past so it is high order in the past

31:03

that determines the existence of traces

31:06

and we think in terms of cause and

31:10

effect

31:11

cause coming first and effect becoming

31:13

after only because of the second

31:16

dynamics because of entropy otherwise

31:18

there could be no dis symmetry

31:20

no physics says that the physical if

31:22

this is connected to that this is

31:23

connected to that both way we cannot say

31:26

this causes this more than this causes

31:29

that because the symmetric Russell used

31:31

to say that the notion of course would

31:34

disappear is wrong it doesn't belong to

31:37

physics it would be recognizes as

31:41

something what is it

31:44

totally useless and mistakenly

31:46

mistakenly considered non damaging like

31:51

the British monarchy and and and sooner

31:57

or later we'll get rid of it he was

31:59

wrong but we'll come back why why he was

32:04

wrong the point is that the entire

32:07

distinction between past and future is a

32:10

microscopical effect due to the fact

32:14

that under our perspective the past look

32:19

more ordered so not only the instant of

32:24

time is not aligned because every line

32:27

in the universe has its own it's on its

32:30

own temper allottee not only makes no

32:33

sense to take one to talk about the now

32:35

of the universe but the distinction with

32:39

one direction of time they are the

32:40

direction of time is some strange

32:42

microscopical effect which you don't see

32:44

in the micro physics 3 oh boy time is

32:48

passing fast us

32:50

I should speed up I am gonna speed up

32:55

because the fourth reason for which the

32:57

our community of time is completely

32:59

wrong is less solid than the first three

33:01

first two is science of unison very well

33:04

the fourth reason is the science that I

33:07

do so it's less solid why because I'm

33:10

still doing it right it's not yet in the

33:13

textbook i and all my friends we're

33:15

working on and the point is that there

33:19

is a connection which I just mentioned

33:21

before between time and gravity gravity

33:25

the mass effect

33:27

the speed of time but we know that

33:30

gravity that the understanding way of

33:32

gravity may disregard quantum mechanics

33:34

so this is the proper quantum gravity

33:36

this job of my life so I'm paid for to

33:39

try to write the equation for quantum

33:42

gravity there are a set of equation that

33:46

we have written down for describing the

33:49

quantum properties of gravity and these

33:52

equations tell us something about this

33:58

what the clock measure and tell us I

34:01

would say three things one is that a

34:05

anything that works like a clock cannot

34:09

measure time local time continuously

34:11

because there's a minimal amount of time

34:14

so there is something granular in the

34:16

passage of time I understand that in the

34:18

UK there is a current debate on children

34:23

not being able to read analogous clocks

34:27

so they only read the digital clocks so

34:30

they come out with the wrong idea that

34:32

time is discrete that is digital right

34:34

which is the right thing so very good I

34:38

don't see why kids should be able to

34:40

read digital clock I wasn't very good in

34:43

reading digital clock when I was a kid

34:45

because I didn't use clock so Chinese

34:49

digital as a very short scale of course

34:51

not seconds of fraction of a second of

34:53

the Planck scale 10 to the minus 44

34:55

seconds very very small time intervals

35:01

but that's a minimal timing there's no

35:03

smaller time interval than that not only

35:06

that but the clocks itself because a

35:08

quantum object everything's a quantum

35:10

object can be in super positions of

35:12

different position of the handle a

35:15

different reading so you cannot say that

35:18

between this event and this event is a

35:20

certain amount of time there because as

35:22

always in quantum mechanics there could

35:24

be a probability distribution of time

35:27

passing from one and the other so you

35:29

see that everything you use to think

35:33

about time disappears when you go to the

35:36

widest possible

35:38

situation which is quantum gravity which

35:40

you keep into account everything we know

35:42

about the world world today in fact in

35:45

the equations of look onto gravity the

35:47

theory which I'm working brings together

35:50

quantum mechanics general activity in

35:52

the equations of that theory there is no

35:54

time variable at all why because you

35:57

don't need a time variable you have a

35:59

lot of variables you have a lot of

36:01

clocks you have a lot of things that

36:02

change at the basic level time is just

36:07

any way of counting the change of

36:11

something which by the way is the

36:13

definition of time that Aristotle gave

36:17

25 whatever centuries ago time is a

36:20

number of changing you look at something

36:22

changing day night day night day night

36:25

you count and this is time time is a

36:28

counting of change then Newton came out

36:31

with this idea

36:32

you completely knew that time is not

36:35

just a changing of something but it's

36:38

some uniformly flowing something that

36:44

flows irrespectively of whether is

36:47

matter changing or not is completely

36:50

Newtonian idea is a new idea it is in

36:53

your mind because you studied it at

36:54

school because it's a permeated our

36:56

society but it's not the old way of

36:57

thinking about that the old way of

36:59

thinking about time is that you see sink

37:00

changing you number them she's fine

37:03

but Newton comes up we said well there

37:05

is that way of seeing of times it's not

37:07

other way of thinking of time my

37:08

newtonian way which is the time just

37:12

passes even if nothing changes then I

37:15

still recognizes that this Newtonian

37:18

time in this Newtonian space which also

37:21

you to introduce city of empty space

37:23

there's nothing else about space um are

37:26

actually the gravitation field it's

37:30

nothing else the gravitational field so

37:31

I think in a sense says oh yeah you're

37:34

right Newton that there is something

37:35

else beside the counting of things

37:38

there's this absolute time maps of space

37:40

but you're wrong in not seeing that

37:44

these are dynamical object is just

37:45

electromagnetic wave it's just a little

37:48

magnetic field this is a gravitational

37:50

field so it's a sort of

37:52

something that fills up everything which

37:54

is the Einstein four-dimensional a

37:57

curved space-time and once you realize

37:59

that this ice and four dimensional

38:01

curved space-time which is a

38:02

gravitational field as quantum

38:03

properties it can be in superposition is

38:05

granular it has all the funny thing

38:08

there does all the funny things up when

38:09

two things do the Newtonian time is a

38:12

completely exploded it depends on the

38:15

interaction is granulars

38:16

different point of point there is two T

38:19

Leontine the basic idea that you can

38:21

count event still there so in quantum

38:25

gravity of events not order it in line

38:29

that the British but all confused like

38:31

the Italians connected to one another

38:34

you can follow this one this one this

38:37

one and you can see okay doing this blah

38:39

blah blah number of things happened so

38:41

this moved a certain number of clicks

38:43

and so you can have a local notion of

38:46

sequence of event which is a minimal

38:49

notion of time and that's the only thing

38:51

that remains locally probabilistic

38:54

discrete without a prefer a time

38:57

variable anything at work as a variable

38:59

and that's the no time the minimum time

39:02

of quantum gravity I promised you a

39:06

journey back so I have less time

39:09

remaining because I was supposed to

39:11

finish here and already here to take you

39:14

back so I hope I convinced you well I

39:18

don't hope I convince you I hope I gave

39:20

you a sense of the very very weak

39:25

temporal notion needed to do fundamental

39:27

physics I've written a paper whose title

39:31

is forget time so write the fundamental

39:35

equation of quantum gravity and if you

39:36

don't see there which one's the time

39:38

variable don't worry you don't need a

39:40

time variable because the time variable

39:41

is something microscopic not something

39:45

down there down there if many variables

39:48

change one or respect to another how do

39:52

we go back from there from that

39:57

basic reality we have to find the

39:59

conditions under which we live which

40:03

allow us to talk about this long line

40:06

oriented and common which is time and

40:08

this is a number of steps there are many

40:10

steps different levels different layers

40:13

each one is interesting by itself but

40:16

they're separated time doesn't come up

40:18

off in one step comes up at various

40:21

levels first of all the granularity of

40:24

time is so small we don't have such

40:28

precision so we don't see it

40:30

this flow we can see it continues the

40:34

quantum mechanical superposition aspect

40:36

of time we are big and heavy and much

40:41

work at scale much larger than the

40:43

Planck constant which is what determines

40:46

the quantum mechanical effect so we

40:48

don't see it so we actually see a

40:51

gravitational field as a continuous

40:53

things like I stand described but we

40:56

live in a region in which gravity is

40:58

very very weak compared to black hole

41:01

though is really strong and is very very

41:04

weak essentially this nice thing curved

41:07

space time is flat and this is flat

41:10

Einstein space time are assembled very

41:13

much Newtonian space in Newtonian time

41:15

not exactly because link Oskie

41:17

space-time but very much but we don't

41:23

move fast to respect one respect to one

41:25

another so we can disregard the time

41:28

back and forth of the light and we are

41:30

so so we can assume that light instead

41:32

of going a finite speed goes at infinite

41:34

speed because now experience life is

41:37

sent essentially infinite velocity don't

41:41

resolve the light travel at a time

41:44

travel of light so if time is a at

41:47

infinite speed then we have these

41:49

surfaces of simultaneity we can think

41:53

that we're in this in our bubble and so

41:56

we can talk about one single time right

42:00

so now we have a one-dimensional line

42:03

which is still not oriented past and

42:06

future so what is it oriented it past if

42:09

you

42:09

well let's go slowly first of all

42:12

remember it's entropy entropy depend on

42:19

the way we look at the world or the way

42:21

we interact with respect to the world so

42:24

I think and take this as an hypothesis

42:28

not as something demonstrated some of my

42:30

colleagues disagree that what makes

42:35

entropy low down there in the past

42:39

saying the early universe entropy was

42:41

very very low he's not the fact that the

42:44

universe was arranged in a very ordered

42:46

way the universe was arranged whatever

42:48

it was a you arranged is the fact that

42:51

we look at the universe we interact with

42:53

the rest in a way which is very

42:56

particular because we are particular we

42:58

meaning we as a physical system

43:00

interacting with the race though such

43:02

that under this perspective the past was

43:07

special imagine you take a cart you mix

43:10

them you look at them and you remember

43:14

the order okay that order disappears

43:18

when you mix again so you see a

43:21

increasing of disorder but that order

43:23

was special because you decided to a

43:25

special you looked at them and learned

43:27

it so in some sense we are special

43:31

subset of the universe that interact

43:34

with the rest of the universe in such a

43:35

way then the past looks ordered to us

43:38

what is special is not the universe is a

43:41

subset of the universe to which we

43:43

belong this is called area the Pacific

43:45

title origin of entropy and I think it

43:51

could be an ingredient for understanding

43:53

why the past even for the future there's

43:55

nothing special in the early universe is

43:57

special the microscopy the coarse

43:59

graining that we do are we done not yet

44:04

not yet and there is a last step and to

44:09

me this has been the greatest surprise

44:12

and here I'm stepping a little bit out

44:15

of my own comfortable zone but it's what

44:17

I've been learning and learning and

44:18

um there is something about time which

44:22

is still missing

44:23

and there are some philosopher even some

44:25

physicists who says we have got the

44:27

entire story wrong because time flows

44:30

train passes time sort of passes at a

44:33

certain speed and we don't see that in

44:36

all this physical picture so maybe there

44:39

is some fundamental fundamental

44:40

fundamental law of time that says after

44:43

all there is this passing of time I

44:44

think they're right they're wrong and

44:47

and and many other colleagues of mine

44:51

including many Philosopher's

44:52

increasingly getting convinced that what

44:57

we refer to when we refer to this

44:59

flowing of time this passing of time

45:01

this clear feeling that we have about

45:06

the flowing of time is not in the

45:09

quantum gravity is not in generative it

45:11

is not in quantum mechanics is not in

45:13

thermodynamics is in the specific way

45:16

our brain works and there is an enormous

45:20

amount of working today in the

45:23

neurosciences in the function our brain

45:26

with a title of a book by a

45:28

neuroscientist called dilben Amano

45:30

a recent book in America if the title is

45:33

your brain is a time machine what does

45:35

it mean the way the brain works is to

45:38

exploit this entropy gradient and the

45:41

fact there traces of the past to build

45:44

memories and in terms of this compute

45:47

the future and anticipate the future

45:50

that's basic working of the plane

45:52

according to one of the importance of

45:54

how the brain works so the brain is the

45:56

time machine brings us continuously sort

45:58

of grasping to some events in this

46:01

confused set of events around ask we are

46:05

connected by traces to some event tour

46:07

the past we are connected by

46:09

anticipation on the other direction so

46:13

in our mind there is this opening space

46:17

okay you think that this is a metaphor

46:22

of what this is metaphor our memories of

46:26

some of the past and in fact that's why

46:28

is much more confused over the future

46:29

because we don't have

46:31

of the future when we think about time

46:33

very often we're not thinking about the

46:36

physical part of the physical future but

46:38

we are considering the memories we have

46:41

about physical person and and the anta

46:44

patient we have about the future um

46:46

philosopher has been saying that for a

46:48

very long time who sir has been saying

46:51

that it goes back to st. Augustine

46:53

famous pages about the nature of time in

46:57

his book the confessions he says when I

47:05

listen to music I get a meaning from a

47:10

musical phrase but I never listen to the

47:15

phrase I listen to one note at a time

47:17

right if I listen to one note how do I

47:20

know about the previous notes okay get

47:23

the meaning well of course I know

47:24

because I remember them but if I

47:27

remember them and who sir is very clear

47:29

in that the meaning comes from the notes

47:32

beings playing now and the memories of

47:36

the previous one so it's all in the

47:39

present so to say and it can be only the

47:41

present together because as memory but

47:45

it's more than that

47:45

because since the brain is designed by

47:48

evolution to use memory to anticipate

47:50

for a purpose because it it designed to

47:55

try to get somewhere that that's how

47:57

living evolution design our our our

48:00

behavior then all this is strongly

48:05

emotionally charged the passage of time

48:08

is not for us a rational thing to

48:11

contemplate it's something we live in -

48:14

we are the past this passage of time

48:16

where this constant computing of time

48:18

you can think about reality without

48:21

space we can think about reality without

48:24

things you can say it's very hard to

48:26

think yourself in a reality without time

48:28

you wouldn't know how to start thinking

48:31

but the confusion is is this because

48:33

rarity by itself cannot be thought

48:35

without time no is because our thinking

48:38

cannot be talked about time we cannot

48:41

think

48:41

we are a time machine not the universe

48:43

use a time machine you use just a bunch

48:46

of thing of events vertically connected

48:48

to one another which in some

48:49

approximation are nicely ordered but

48:52

what we think when we think about time

48:54

is the personal of the memory and in the

48:59

anticipation give us the sense that we

49:02

are in this space right all of us what

49:06

is the real time real time is now ten

49:08

minutes ago my life but then I've been

49:10

to school so I know about all the kings

49:13

of England

49:14

so this long line right the line of the

49:16

kings of England in Queens and and so I

49:20

have some extended memory which is a

49:21

cultural memory I've studied physics and

49:23

cosmology so I have this memory longer

49:26

it's all today it's all my knowledge

49:29

days all here in the book I talk about

49:32

post post as the reason has written this

49:35

fantastic novel in search of lost time

49:39

it's all about time he says that

49:42

explicitly section of the meaning of

49:45

time and the novel is full of stories

49:48

character things but then novel is

49:50

presented not as what is happening in

49:53

the world or what has happened in the

49:55

world but as the memory of the main

49:58

character whose name is probably Marcel

50:04

so all the 3,000 pages of Proust novel

50:08

are about what's in this you know five

50:12

inches between the years of Marcel it's

50:15

all here and that's the greatest

50:17

intuition of truth to understand what is

50:22

time for us we have to look at the

50:23

specific of our brain functioning more

50:28

than the temporal structural universe

50:31

itself of course these religions were

50:33

not saying that temple structures unit

50:35

still is irrelevant but I'm saying that

50:38

by looking only at the temporal

50:40

structure of the units you always get

50:41

the feeling that there's something

50:42

missing with respect to the time of our

50:45

experience and so you do metaphysical

50:49

speculation about the primary key of

50:51

time to completely wrong because of

50:53

course there's something

50:54

because doesn't pertain to the

50:56

fundamental strike for us it pertain to

50:58

the way our brain machine works and last

51:05

point it's truly emotionally colored

51:10

time is not emotionally neutral to us

51:14

precisely because we are our brain is a

51:19

machine designed to tell the story about

51:22

the past and do something in the future

51:25

we are full of motivation hunger if

51:28

thirst

51:28

we have ambition with curiosity with

51:30

love with hate that's what we are

51:33

before being rational beings and this

51:36

drive is the drive of the brain that you

51:41

know control our hostesses and and and

51:44

and and struggle to make us survive and

51:47

do better because evolution wants us to

51:49

be like that it's already entering time

51:53

it's all in time so time is emotionally

51:57

charged for us time is what brings us

51:59

things we want is the opening of the

52:01

future okay in time is what is motional

52:04

charge for us because it makes us lose

52:06

thing constantly all the time in in in

52:09

in Buddhism there is the speed

52:14

psychological side I think the main

52:16

truth of Buddhism IRS's life is

52:18

sufferance but the second is that the

52:19

life is sufferance because we have

52:22

difficulty of dealing with impermanence

52:24

with time so time is a source of our

52:27

suffering we suffer because we lose

52:29

thing or because we have lost things or

52:32

because we shall we think we will lose

52:33

things so it's we're gonna die so this

52:36

is a quintessential

52:37

source of anxiety for for human so x is

52:41

strongly colored emotionally and why I'm

52:43

saying this because I think if we think

52:46

that this emotional side of time is a

52:51

sort of fog that does not allow us to

52:55

see the real nature of time we are

52:58

confusing yourself because this

53:01

emotional aspect of time is precisely

53:04

what is deeply time for us

53:06

time for us is this emotional connection

53:11

to the event of the world that go away

53:14

that pass that flow that we lose and

53:20

this is a looot of our strong sense of

53:24

passing time and feeling feeling time is

53:26

ingrained working of our of our brain

53:31

this is vaguely connected to this event

53:33

it works because it's entropy of course

53:35

because it our scale we can orient Orion

53:39

things like like like this but you see

53:42

understanding time means bringing out

53:47

the pieces of the of the of this layer

53:50

the complex object time is not a single

53:53

thing is all my grass is not a single

53:56

thing is all these layers that come from

53:59

approximation from this regarding aspect

54:02

of nature from thermodynamics from our

54:06

particular relation to the world n from

54:09

our function if our brain including this

54:13

emotional level out there the more we go

54:17

general in the picture of the universe

54:19

the more time loses species there is a

54:21

very weak form of temporality and in

54:24

closest to us I think the strong

54:28

emotional connection with time the

54:30

motion of time is what time is for us

54:44

you

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free